Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Returned Maps
Link on message: #5658059
Link on message: #5658059
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion for the following returned maps:
• Serene coast
• Komarin
• Swamp
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion for the following returned maps:
• Serene coast
• Komarin
• Swamp
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: Wszystko o Gamescom! :-)
Link on message: #5658040
Link on message: #5658040
Cmd_Latina: Drugi dzień targów otwarto tanecznie! 
Udało nam się na chwilę oderwać 1ntera od jego obowiązków!

Udało nam się na chwilę oderwać 1ntera od jego obowiązków!

Subject: New Map Tundra
Link on message: #5658020
Link on message: #5658020
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new map Tundra:
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new map Tundra:
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: Changes to Soviet 100mm Guns
Link on message: #5657993
Link on message: #5657993
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the changes to following Soviet 100mm guns:
• LB-1
• D-10Т
• D-10С
• LB-1С.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the changes to following Soviet 100mm guns:
• LB-1
• D-10Т
• D-10С
• LB-1С.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: Changed Characteristics
Link on message: #5657878
Link on message: #5657878
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the Engine and Characteristics of the following vehicles:
• Е-50
• E-75,
• Jagdpanther
• Jagdpanther II
• Jagdtiger
• Panther II
• Panther
• Tiger
• Tiger II
• VK 28.01.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the Engine and Characteristics of the following vehicles:
• Е-50
• E-75,
• Jagdpanther
• Jagdpanther II
• Jagdtiger
• Panther II
• Panther
• Tiger
• Tiger II
• VK 28.01.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: Chinese Tanks ACPR Penetration Po-471 122mm
Link on message: #5657825
Link on message: #5657825
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the ACPR Changes in Penetration with the Chinese Po-417 122mm gun.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the ACPR Changes in Penetration with the Chinese Po-417 122mm gun.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: Rebalanced T26E4 SuperPershing
Link on message: #5657745
Link on message: #5657745
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the rebalanced T26E4 SuperPershing.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the rebalanced T26E4 SuperPershing.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: New German Tier 6 medium tank VK 30.02 (M)
Link on message: #5657173
Link on message: #5657173
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the New German Tier 6 medium tank VK 30.02 (M).
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the New German Tier 6 medium tank VK 30.02 (M).
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: New German heavy tier IV Durchbruchswagen 2
Link on message: #5657145
Link on message: #5657145
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new German heavy tier IV Durchbruchswagen 2 .
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new German heavy tier IV Durchbruchswagen 2 .
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: Changes for the VK 36.01 (H)
Link on message: #5657121
Link on message: #5657121
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the changes from for the VK 36.01(H) which has been moved from medium category to heavy category.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the changes from for the VK 36.01(H) which has been moved from medium category to heavy category.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: Changes for the VK 30.01 (H)
Link on message: #5657097
Link on message: #5657097
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the changes from for the VK 30.01(H) which has been moved from tier VI to tier V and from medium category to heavy category.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the changes from for the VK 30.01(H) which has been moved from tier VI to tier V and from medium category to heavy category.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: New Soviet Medium Tank Object 140
Link on message: #5656888
Link on message: #5656888
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new Soviet medium tank Object 140.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new Soviet medium tank Object 140.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: New Soviet Medium Tank Object 416
Link on message: #5656880
Link on message: #5656880
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new Soviet medium tank Object 416.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new Soviet medium tank Object 416.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: New Soviet medium tank A-44
Link on message: #5656865
Link on message: #5656865
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new Soviet medium tank A-44.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new Soviet medium tank A-44.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: New Soviet Medium Tank A-43
Link on message: #5656643
Link on message: #5656643
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new Soviet medium tank A-43.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
This is the specific feedback thread for the discussion of the new Soviet medium tank A-43.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Subject: General Discussion V 8.8
Link on message: #5656600
Link on message: #5656600
IPaul72: Greetings Commanders!
This is the specific feedback thread for your views on the patch as a whole.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Thanks in advance
Version Test Server 8.8 Patch notes
The list of changes of the of the 0.8.8 public test version 1 compared to the 0.8.7 version.
Added a new thread of Soviet medium tanks:
• А-43 (Tier 6, will be a continuation of T-34)
• А-44 (Tier 7)
• Object 416 (Tier 8)
• Object 140 (Tier 10, temporarily will be a continuation of T-54)
Added changes to the German tanks:
• Tank VK 30.01(H) transferred from tier 6 to tier 5 and from medium to heavy category.
• Tank VK 36.01(H) transferred from medium to heavy category
Added new German tanks:
• Tier 4 heavy tank Durchbruchswagen 2
• Tier 6 medium tank VK 30.02 (M)
In the gift shop added new Chinese premium tanks:
• Tier 8 medium tank Т-34-3
• Tier 8 heavy tank 112
Changed the engines and characteristics of the following German vehicles:
• Е-50
• E-75,
• Jagdpanther
• Jagdpanther II
• Jagdtiger
• Panther II
• Panther
• Tiger
• Tiger II
• VK 28.01.
Increased the damage and, consequently decreased rate of fire, for Soviet 100mm guns:
• LB-1
• D-10Т
• D-10С
• LB-1С.
Corrected some errors of E-100, SU-76b visual models.
• Added a new map ‘Tundra” (a Soviet rocky-sylvan territory, beginning of the autumn, game zone 800x800 meters
Returned some old maps after reworking:
• "Serene coast" (heavy readjustment).
• "Komarin" (heavy readjustment).
• "Swamp" (light readjustment).
Minor Fixes and Changes
Rebalanced the T26E4 SuperPershing tank (front armour and some other parameters); added the possibility to sell it back for gold; the tank is added to the in-game store.
For Chinese tanks, the penetration of the APCR shell on the Po-471 122mm guns has been changed from 300mm to 250mm
Changed the engines and characteristics of German vehicles: Е-50, E-75, Jagdpanther, Jagdpanther II, Jagdtiger, Panther II, Panther, Tiger, Tiger II, VK 28.01.
Increased the damage and decreased rate of fire for the following Soviet 100mm guns: LB-1, D-10Т, D-10С, LB-1С.
Corrected some errors on the E-100, SU-76b visual models.
Significantly expanded the functionality of missions. An interface with description and current mission status has been added to the client.
Added protection against the accidental selling of tanks.
Significantly improved the quality of FXAA antialiasing (for improved graphics)
Completely reworked the statistics and achievement page. Changed players’ global rating calculation.
Added the voiceovers for each nation’s crews. A crew of a particular nation speaks in their own language. This can be switched on in the settings.
Localised crew voiceover added – crew members of the relevant nation speak in their own languages. This option can be switched on in the Game settings.
Fixed some problems with balancer which appeared in Version 8.6 and that were not fixed in Version 8.7.
Designations returned for all regions: “Иосиф Сталин”, “За Сталина!”, “Сталинец”.
When enhanced torsions are mounted (all types) the damage of the tank chassis is reduced, as well as the damage of the tank itself through its chassis when ramming and falling.
When your team is defeated but you get one of the Battle Hero, Epic or Platoon achievements, you will now receive х1.5 credits and experience (as for the victorious team).
Multiple fixes and improvements applied to the battle tutorial.
Changed the rules for determining who caused a ramming. It will now default to the player whose tank has the highest speed at the moment of the ramming encounter.
If you have been invited to a platoon or tank company, you will now automatically re-login to the server that the invitation was sent from should you disconnect.
Implemented an option to move crew members in and out of the damaged tank.
Implemented new option to switch on the inversion of reverse moving: now when reversing and pressing the button to turn in a certain direction your tank will move in this direction, and not the opposite as for disabled inversion.
The "spall liner" equipment will now also reduce the chance of crew damage: light - 20%, medium - 25%, heavy - 30%, superheavy - 50%.
In the Hangar, the "main/reserve" tank attribute on the carousel" is now stored on the server rather than the client as it was before.
When switching off the auto-aiming option, it is no longer necessary to move the aiming indicator off the locked tank.
Changed the model of flags and base flagpoles for all maps.
Added the ability to scroll through the list of the enemy team members in the "personal score" bookmark in the battle results statistics window.
Added automatic shooting when pressing-and-holding the fire button.
Added a warning about wrong layout or wrong characters when entering a password for the login window.
The option to dismiss a crew member by right-clicking on them in the hangar has been removed from the context menu to prevent accidental dismissals.
A detailed description of use and working principles has been added for consumables.
A link to “recover password” has been added to the login window when entering invalid password.
Reworked some special effects.
"We’ve hit them hard" phrase has been removed from the voiceover.
Fixed some bugs in the after battle statistics window.
Improved the logic of closing the interface windows by pressing "Esc" button.
Added new type of visual effects for cumulative projectile ricochets.
Changed the logic of the "sliders" in the Service window.
122 mm D-25T gun with piston shutter removed from KV1-S
The following problems are known: Periodic 'freezes' of hangar if there are a large amount of vehicles in the carousel.
Periodic 'freezes' of the Store and Depot if there are lots of items in them.
Possible client crashes during battle loading or switch via Alt + Tab
Possible aim sticking/freezing during switching to the sniper mode. These are the known problems and will be fixed ASAP.
To obtain the premium vehicles:
112
T34-3
Please see the mission tab in the test server user interface.
This is the specific feedback thread for your views on the patch as a whole.
Please keep your posts as clear and constructive as possible - irrelevant/off-topic entries may be deleted or moved to another section.
Thanks in advance
Version Test Server 8.8 Patch notes
The list of changes of the of the 0.8.8 public test version 1 compared to the 0.8.7 version.
Added a new thread of Soviet medium tanks:
• А-43 (Tier 6, will be a continuation of T-34)
• А-44 (Tier 7)
• Object 416 (Tier 8)
• Object 140 (Tier 10, temporarily will be a continuation of T-54)
Added changes to the German tanks:
• Tank VK 30.01(H) transferred from tier 6 to tier 5 and from medium to heavy category.
• Tank VK 36.01(H) transferred from medium to heavy category
Added new German tanks:
• Tier 4 heavy tank Durchbruchswagen 2
• Tier 6 medium tank VK 30.02 (M)
In the gift shop added new Chinese premium tanks:
• Tier 8 medium tank Т-34-3
• Tier 8 heavy tank 112
Changed the engines and characteristics of the following German vehicles:
• Е-50
• E-75,
• Jagdpanther
• Jagdpanther II
• Jagdtiger
• Panther II
• Panther
• Tiger
• Tiger II
• VK 28.01.
Increased the damage and, consequently decreased rate of fire, for Soviet 100mm guns:
• LB-1
• D-10Т
• D-10С
• LB-1С.
Corrected some errors of E-100, SU-76b visual models.
• Added a new map ‘Tundra” (a Soviet rocky-sylvan territory, beginning of the autumn, game zone 800x800 meters
Returned some old maps after reworking:
• "Serene coast" (heavy readjustment).
• "Komarin" (heavy readjustment).
• "Swamp" (light readjustment).
Minor Fixes and Changes
Rebalanced the T26E4 SuperPershing tank (front armour and some other parameters); added the possibility to sell it back for gold; the tank is added to the in-game store.
For Chinese tanks, the penetration of the APCR shell on the Po-471 122mm guns has been changed from 300mm to 250mm
Changed the engines and characteristics of German vehicles: Е-50, E-75, Jagdpanther, Jagdpanther II, Jagdtiger, Panther II, Panther, Tiger, Tiger II, VK 28.01.
Increased the damage and decreased rate of fire for the following Soviet 100mm guns: LB-1, D-10Т, D-10С, LB-1С.
Corrected some errors on the E-100, SU-76b visual models.
Significantly expanded the functionality of missions. An interface with description and current mission status has been added to the client.
Added protection against the accidental selling of tanks.
Significantly improved the quality of FXAA antialiasing (for improved graphics)
Completely reworked the statistics and achievement page. Changed players’ global rating calculation.
Added the voiceovers for each nation’s crews. A crew of a particular nation speaks in their own language. This can be switched on in the settings.
Localised crew voiceover added – crew members of the relevant nation speak in their own languages. This option can be switched on in the Game settings.
Fixed some problems with balancer which appeared in Version 8.6 and that were not fixed in Version 8.7.
Designations returned for all regions: “Иосиф Сталин”, “За Сталина!”, “Сталинец”.
When enhanced torsions are mounted (all types) the damage of the tank chassis is reduced, as well as the damage of the tank itself through its chassis when ramming and falling.
When your team is defeated but you get one of the Battle Hero, Epic or Platoon achievements, you will now receive х1.5 credits and experience (as for the victorious team).
Multiple fixes and improvements applied to the battle tutorial.
Changed the rules for determining who caused a ramming. It will now default to the player whose tank has the highest speed at the moment of the ramming encounter.
If you have been invited to a platoon or tank company, you will now automatically re-login to the server that the invitation was sent from should you disconnect.
Implemented an option to move crew members in and out of the damaged tank.
Implemented new option to switch on the inversion of reverse moving: now when reversing and pressing the button to turn in a certain direction your tank will move in this direction, and not the opposite as for disabled inversion.
The "spall liner" equipment will now also reduce the chance of crew damage: light - 20%, medium - 25%, heavy - 30%, superheavy - 50%.
In the Hangar, the "main/reserve" tank attribute on the carousel" is now stored on the server rather than the client as it was before.
When switching off the auto-aiming option, it is no longer necessary to move the aiming indicator off the locked tank.
Changed the model of flags and base flagpoles for all maps.
Added the ability to scroll through the list of the enemy team members in the "personal score" bookmark in the battle results statistics window.
Added automatic shooting when pressing-and-holding the fire button.
Added a warning about wrong layout or wrong characters when entering a password for the login window.
The option to dismiss a crew member by right-clicking on them in the hangar has been removed from the context menu to prevent accidental dismissals.
A detailed description of use and working principles has been added for consumables.
A link to “recover password” has been added to the login window when entering invalid password.
Reworked some special effects.
"We’ve hit them hard" phrase has been removed from the voiceover.
Fixed some bugs in the after battle statistics window.
Improved the logic of closing the interface windows by pressing "Esc" button.
Added new type of visual effects for cumulative projectile ricochets.
Changed the logic of the "sliders" in the Service window.
122 mm D-25T gun with piston shutter removed from KV1-S
The following problems are known: Periodic 'freezes' of hangar if there are a large amount of vehicles in the carousel.
Periodic 'freezes' of the Store and Depot if there are lots of items in them.
Possible client crashes during battle loading or switch via Alt + Tab
Possible aim sticking/freezing during switching to the sniper mode. These are the known problems and will be fixed ASAP.
To obtain the premium vehicles:
112
T34-3
Please see the mission tab in the test server user interface.
Subject: Global clan rankings
Link on message: #5654662
Link on message: #5654662
OldFox: Тема скатилась во флуд и дрязги. Закрыто.
Subject: [GLX] Galaxy Project
Link on message: #5650965
Link on message: #5650965
OldFox: Дальше будут не предупреждения, а РО.
Subject: gamescom Special
Link on message: #5650731
Link on message: #5650731
IPaul72: Hello all
We hope you all have a fantastic from tomorrow and throughout the weekend with this special
Kind Regards
IPaul72
We hope you all have a fantastic from tomorrow and throughout the weekend with this special

Kind Regards
IPaul72
Subject: gamescom Special
Link on message: #5650451
Link on message: #5650451
Obirian: Enjoy this special guys! See you at gamescom if you can and
want!
Cheers,
Obirian
Cheers,
Obirian
Subject: gamescom-Special
Link on message: #5650407
Link on message: #5650407
Obirian: So Leute, das nenn ich ein Special! Viel Spass und ich würde mich
natürlich freuen, soviele von euch wie möglich auf der gamescom zu
sehen!
Gruß,
Obirian
Gruß,
Obirian
Subject: All things done in moderation
Link on message: #5649536
Costarring, on 21 August 2013 - 12:42 PM, said: Thank you iPaul72,
Straight up reply.
I understand the "red for moderators" idea, but technically that should have been implemented in the forum, from the very beginning
What about getting punished for using other collours besides red? Yes it happened, but I can't find the post ("There is no information to show.")
Different sized fonts? Dunno, I see those kind of posts regularly, but I got a warning for "Too many capitols".
No rep left to give away b.t.w. gave the last to SgtGuffers...
conductiv, on 21 August 2013 - 01:01 PM, said: I'm gonna +1 the post for saying that you won't discriminate
between players, breaking rules is breaking the rules after
all.
but you might want to adjust the warning points system a bit to reduce the impact of it on frequent constructive posters. lots of posts is lots of chances of minor rule transgressions that involve swearwords, and they eventually add up to a full ban..but for some posters that can take 5000 posts or more, dumbing out once or twice over 1000 posts. while the truly poor forumites achieve their warnings in a rather small amount of posts and most transgressions would most likely be more severe.
or am I talking nonsense here.
Gremlin182, on 21 August 2013 - 01:11 PM, said: Speaking in general terms here if there is a discussion that could
be leading somewhere but its peppered by insults leading to posters
diverging from the thread to answer these posters there are 3
things the moderator could do.
1 ignore
2 close the thread
3 delete the posters making unhelpful comments.
Really its a no win situation for the moderator as the latter option though appealing would probably lead to many posts about censorship and would also be time consuming.
Unless we learn to police our own forum things will continue as they are. not replying to troll posts ever would be a good start, as would taking the attitude if I have nothing useful to say shut up.
zuze91, on 21 August 2013 - 01:16 PM, said: Topics are closed because WG dont want to people think and see the
problem.
Cpt_Kawa, on 21 August 2013 - 01:25 PM, said: Actually that is the original topic. I couldn't read any insults or
something similar in the thread by Miros and his thread got closed
probably for some really weird reasons. What do you mean with
"argumentative posts"? There is a topic, people talk about it and
the discussion gets a bit emotional, so what? Reading through your
answers makes me think there is a bot typing this. And please stop
bringing up this:
We all know by now that most probably nothing will ever happen to a mod who was reported for misconduct. Lets be honest here WG policy is: "We do as we are pleased and if an incident, which we don't like isn't covered by some rule we are just going to make one up." Just be honest 1 time. Actually I think before you are posting this kind of answers you just did in here, you shouldn't answer at all.
No, you are not talking nonsense at all, but just as those automated ingame systems the forum moderation is really sub par - well fits right in the WG attitude.
Link on message: #5649536

Straight up reply.
I understand the "red for moderators" idea, but technically that should have been implemented in the forum, from the very beginning
What about getting punished for using other collours besides red? Yes it happened, but I can't find the post ("There is no information to show.")
Different sized fonts? Dunno, I see those kind of posts regularly, but I got a warning for "Too many capitols".
No rep left to give away b.t.w. gave the last to SgtGuffers...
IPaul72: Hello there Costarring
All I can say is that the red text part was there in the old forum rules when I was a moderator from april last year, but before then I can't really answer.
Using other colours is ok I think its just best to avoid the Red text. However reading yellow text on a white background is bad (it strains the old eye balls) you wouldn't get a warning for it but no one would know what you were saying
Different sized fonts is another thing altogether it is ok to use capitals as long as it isn't excessive if you know what I mean. For example writing your whole reply in them as it is considered shouting which can be very rude if it was in person.
All I can say is that the red text part was there in the old forum rules when I was a moderator from april last year, but before then I can't really answer.

Using other colours is ok I think its just best to avoid the Red text. However reading yellow text on a white background is bad (it strains the old eye balls) you wouldn't get a warning for it but no one would know what you were saying

Different sized fonts is another thing altogether it is ok to use capitals as long as it isn't excessive if you know what I mean. For example writing your whole reply in them as it is considered shouting which can be very rude if it was in person.


but you might want to adjust the warning points system a bit to reduce the impact of it on frequent constructive posters. lots of posts is lots of chances of minor rule transgressions that involve swearwords, and they eventually add up to a full ban..but for some posters that can take 5000 posts or more, dumbing out once or twice over 1000 posts. while the truly poor forumites achieve their warnings in a rather small amount of posts and most transgressions would most likely be more severe.
or am I talking nonsense here.
IPaul72: Hello there conductiv
No your not talking nonsense at all, in part I agree. However we have discussed at length this and many idea's brought forward and come up with different solutions.
But at this moment in time this current system seems to be working. If you have any other solutions I would happily put them forward to the moderations manager for you
No your not talking nonsense at all, in part I agree. However we have discussed at length this and many idea's brought forward and come up with different solutions.
But at this moment in time this current system seems to be working. If you have any other solutions I would happily put them forward to the moderations manager for you


1 ignore
2 close the thread
3 delete the posters making unhelpful comments.
Really its a no win situation for the moderator as the latter option though appealing would probably lead to many posts about censorship and would also be time consuming.
Unless we learn to police our own forum things will continue as they are. not replying to troll posts ever would be a good start, as would taking the attitude if I have nothing useful to say shut up.
IPaul72: Hello there Gremlin182
This I do agree with has I have been in this situation and basically like you say the is catch 22 with it.
1. Ignore never works.
2. If you delete posts you ruin the thread (unless they are deemed very bad and severely break the rules) making the topic nonsence and not conceivable.
3. I would say sometimes an option to close the thread works, This then may stop the arguments getting to a fisty cuffs situation where everyone gets their grandma involved! But to leave the thread in its original position if its not in breach of the forum rules by this I mean off topic,obscenity,profanity ect ect.
4. Most likely option to the one above, Have positive input to the thread and topic this means planting a post and intervening (after all most times all the communities want is a little input and information) even an: Hello would you like a cuppa tea works! This is why both Ectar, iscending and myself love what we do, we get to talk and meet people and most times have great discussions.
This I do agree with has I have been in this situation and basically like you say the is catch 22 with it.
1. Ignore never works.
2. If you delete posts you ruin the thread (unless they are deemed very bad and severely break the rules) making the topic nonsence and not conceivable.
3. I would say sometimes an option to close the thread works, This then may stop the arguments getting to a fisty cuffs situation where everyone gets their grandma involved! But to leave the thread in its original position if its not in breach of the forum rules by this I mean off topic,obscenity,profanity ect ect.
4. Most likely option to the one above, Have positive input to the thread and topic this means planting a post and intervening (after all most times all the communities want is a little input and information) even an: Hello would you like a cuppa tea works! This is why both Ectar, iscending and myself love what we do, we get to talk and meet people and most times have great discussions.


IPaul72: Hello there Cpt_Kawa
I'm sorry my original reply didn't please you I can tell you're not very keen of me and this is ok (I can't lie it hurts a little but hey!)
However, lets say If a topic is getting to the point of argument and posts getting nasty where there is profanity and abusive remarks, people threatening each other with their grandma's! You know a proper hand bags at 12 o'clock situation.
I would rather see the topic removed so sometimes it is better to close the (hypothetical) topic before that happens. Now I'm not saying this is the case with the previous topic I'm just saying people don't need to see this behavior on the forums of a family game and this I'm sure you can appreciate.
I will be honest about this remark:
(We all know by now that most probably nothing will ever happen to a mod who was reported for misconduct. Lets be honest here WG policy is: "We do as we are pleased and if an incident, which we don't like isn't covered by some rule we are just going to make one up." Just be honest 1 time. Actually I think before you are posting this kind of answers you just did in here, you shouldn't answer at all.)
You would be surprised what happens when this is the case, when a moderator is reported there is a full investigation into the accused and they are called up to explain themselves. Wargaming takes this very seriously has we as a community team and moderators represent the company and Wargaming take their image very seriously as does any professional company.
I'm not going to explain what happens if they are found to be wrong as that is not my business, that's between them the reported and the accused.
To say moderators makes rules up if they can't find them simply out of order (I'm sorry but its preposterous)
If you have hard evidence that this has happened you need to be in contact with support which then gets in contact with the moderator management.
If support doesn't work and you feel cheated then contact one of your community team for example if your post was in German then you need the German language team.
Kind Regards all
IPaul72
I'm sorry my original reply didn't please you I can tell you're not very keen of me and this is ok (I can't lie it hurts a little but hey!)

However, lets say If a topic is getting to the point of argument and posts getting nasty where there is profanity and abusive remarks, people threatening each other with their grandma's! You know a proper hand bags at 12 o'clock situation.
I would rather see the topic removed so sometimes it is better to close the (hypothetical) topic before that happens. Now I'm not saying this is the case with the previous topic I'm just saying people don't need to see this behavior on the forums of a family game and this I'm sure you can appreciate.
I will be honest about this remark:
(We all know by now that most probably nothing will ever happen to a mod who was reported for misconduct. Lets be honest here WG policy is: "We do as we are pleased and if an incident, which we don't like isn't covered by some rule we are just going to make one up." Just be honest 1 time. Actually I think before you are posting this kind of answers you just did in here, you shouldn't answer at all.)
You would be surprised what happens when this is the case, when a moderator is reported there is a full investigation into the accused and they are called up to explain themselves. Wargaming takes this very seriously has we as a community team and moderators represent the company and Wargaming take their image very seriously as does any professional company.
I'm not going to explain what happens if they are found to be wrong as that is not my business, that's between them the reported and the accused.
To say moderators makes rules up if they can't find them simply out of order (I'm sorry but its preposterous)
If you have hard evidence that this has happened you need to be in contact with support which then gets in contact with the moderator management.
If support doesn't work and you feel cheated then contact one of your community team for example if your post was in German then you need the German language team.
Kind Regards all
IPaul72

We all know by now that most probably nothing will ever happen to a mod who was reported for misconduct. Lets be honest here WG policy is: "We do as we are pleased and if an incident, which we don't like isn't covered by some rule we are just going to make one up." Just be honest 1 time. Actually I think before you are posting this kind of answers you just did in here, you shouldn't answer at all.
No, you are not talking nonsense at all, but just as those automated ingame systems the forum moderation is really sub par - well fits right in the WG attitude.
IPaul72:
Subject: Some additional details on Update 8.8
Link on message: #5648475
Link on message: #5648475
_Quasar_: Dear all,
Update 8.8 will soon be released to the Public Test. WG EU and Michael Jivetc decided to shed some more light on it.
It will contain lots of changes, which have not been announced in ASAP, which include:
- Changed the rules of ram causer determination. Now the guilt is recognized for the one whose tank has the highest speed at the moment of the ramming encounter.
- Automatic re-login to other periphery (server) implemented – to the one invite to platoon or company was sent from.
- Implemented an option to move the crew members in and out of the damaged tank.
- Implemented new option to switch on the inversion of the reverse moving: now when reversing and pressing the button of turn in certain direction your tank will move in this certain direction, and not the opposite as for disabled inversion.
- For equipment "spall liner" was added the reduced chance of crew contusion: light - 20%, medium - 25%, heavy - 30%, superheavy - 50%.
- Added automatic shooting when one press-and-holding the fire button.
- Added a warning about wrong layout or wrong characters when entering a password for the login window.
We are excited to bring you this new update. Stay tuned, follow the news and check portal regularly. We will be releasing more information gradually.
_Quasar_
Update 8.8 will soon be released to the Public Test. WG EU and Michael Jivetc decided to shed some more light on it.
It will contain lots of changes, which have not been announced in ASAP, which include:
- Changed the rules of ram causer determination. Now the guilt is recognized for the one whose tank has the highest speed at the moment of the ramming encounter.
- Automatic re-login to other periphery (server) implemented – to the one invite to platoon or company was sent from.
- Implemented an option to move the crew members in and out of the damaged tank.
- Implemented new option to switch on the inversion of the reverse moving: now when reversing and pressing the button of turn in certain direction your tank will move in this certain direction, and not the opposite as for disabled inversion.
- For equipment "spall liner" was added the reduced chance of crew contusion: light - 20%, medium - 25%, heavy - 30%, superheavy - 50%.
- Added automatic shooting when one press-and-holding the fire button.
- Added a warning about wrong layout or wrong characters when entering a password for the login window.
We are excited to bring you this new update. Stay tuned, follow the news and check portal regularly. We will be releasing more information gradually.
_Quasar_
Subject: Alpha komjuniti
Link on message: #5648137
Link on message: #5648137
OldFox: Visiem latviesu speletajiem ir prieks par citu latviesu speletaju
sasniegumiem. Es, latvietis, kad redzu citu letinu, uzreiz gribu ar
vinu apsveicinaties, palidzet, bet ja ir lielas problemas, man
vajag vinu nosutit pie OldFoxa. Vai tas ir sapnis?
Subject: All things done in moderation
Link on message: #5647316
Costarring, on 21 August 2013 - 11:50 AM, said: Taking it up with support has been useless so far.
2x RO ban for "made up on the spot" reasons.
Capitols (punished for using bigger fonts, only the first words of the sentences I posted had capitols)
Text collour (no where in the forum rules does it say you are not allowed to use RED text, and even using a different collour will get you a warning/temp ban)
Please visit Mr Kubrik's "Forum Rules" thread and check... you'll see I'm right.
Both these issues have been pointed out several times (I even asked to get those options removed, but not a damn was given)
And when WG wants to show me the forumrules (in the mail telling me I got a temp ban) the link in the mail doesn't work.... at all (also pointed this out atleast 4 times now... I use Thunderbird with default settings)
Contacting support to solve issues feels rather useless
P.S. http://forum.worldof...24-forum-rules/
Sgt_Guffy, on 21 August 2013 - 11:52 AM, said: *
Thank you for your response and I note what you have stated.
*
I'm aware there were arguementative posts, but any arguement can get heated when the contributor feels their points are important. Some can express themselves better than others. So some licence by moderators is appropriate in certain circumstances, particularly as Miros's thread had provoked a lot of interest and debate.
*
I have see a lot worse conduct over the forum and I would point out the forum was not moderated at all over the weekend and there were some clearly infammatory threads that should have been closed.
*
Miros is one of the better contributors and while this issue is creating so much interest I'd ask moderators to cut him some slack.
*
Regards.
Link on message: #5647316

2x RO ban for "made up on the spot" reasons.
Capitols (punished for using bigger fonts, only the first words of the sentences I posted had capitols)
Text collour (no where in the forum rules does it say you are not allowed to use RED text, and even using a different collour will get you a warning/temp ban)
Please visit Mr Kubrik's "Forum Rules" thread and check... you'll see I'm right.
Both these issues have been pointed out several times (I even asked to get those options removed, but not a damn was given)
And when WG wants to show me the forumrules (in the mail telling me I got a temp ban) the link in the mail doesn't work.... at all (also pointed this out atleast 4 times now... I use Thunderbird with default settings)
Contacting support to solve issues feels rather useless
P.S. http://forum.worldof...24-forum-rules/
IPaul72: Hello there Costarring
If you look at this :
4. FORUM ADMINISTRATION and MODERATION
4.4 Warnings
The warnings and official notifications are set off in red, this font color is reserved by Moderators and Administrators. Any other moderators and administrators’ message is considered to be an ordinary one and is equal to a message of any forum member. Once one of a posts has been moderated, users are not permitted to edit the moderators notes placed within the post. Similarly, the impersonation of the administration or moderating team in any way, is not permitted.
I missed it the first time too
I will have a word with the moderators manager and make sure he informs the moderators about the links not working.
Because if it isn't working for you then it may not be working for others also.
Thanks for informing I will make sure it gets sorted. However you may contact Mr_Kubrick directly if there is something that bugs you lots.
Just bare in mind he is sometimes very busy so it may take him some time to reply
However as a community team we will try help as much as we can.
Kind Regards
If you look at this :
4. FORUM ADMINISTRATION and MODERATION
4.4 Warnings
The warnings and official notifications are set off in red, this font color is reserved by Moderators and Administrators. Any other moderators and administrators’ message is considered to be an ordinary one and is equal to a message of any forum member. Once one of a posts has been moderated, users are not permitted to edit the moderators notes placed within the post. Similarly, the impersonation of the administration or moderating team in any way, is not permitted.
I missed it the first time too

I will have a word with the moderators manager and make sure he informs the moderators about the links not working.
Because if it isn't working for you then it may not be working for others also.
Thanks for informing I will make sure it gets sorted. However you may contact Mr_Kubrick directly if there is something that bugs you lots.
Just bare in mind he is sometimes very busy so it may take him some time to reply

However as a community team we will try help as much as we can.
Kind Regards

Thank you for your response and I note what you have stated.
*
I'm aware there were arguementative posts, but any arguement can get heated when the contributor feels their points are important. Some can express themselves better than others. So some licence by moderators is appropriate in certain circumstances, particularly as Miros's thread had provoked a lot of interest and debate.
*
I have see a lot worse conduct over the forum and I would point out the forum was not moderated at all over the weekend and there were some clearly infammatory threads that should have been closed.
*
Miros is one of the better contributors and while this issue is creating so much interest I'd ask moderators to cut him some slack.
*
Regards.
IPaul72: Hello there Sgt_Guffy
I apologise for the forums over the weekend however the moderators are catching up at the moment this weekend has been quite busy for us all.
If you feel you see anything thats bad though please feel free to report it to it can be brought to their attention much more quickly.
I agree Miros is a good contributor to the forums I like many value Miros views on things as we do with a lot of the community.
However the moderators just enforce the forum rules and can't be seen to discriminate between forum users I'm sure you appreciate the value of this, they have rules to follow like we all do.
However I have waffled on enough lets let the topic get back to it original theme
Kind Regards all
IPaul72
I apologise for the forums over the weekend however the moderators are catching up at the moment this weekend has been quite busy for us all.
If you feel you see anything thats bad though please feel free to report it to it can be brought to their attention much more quickly.
I agree Miros is a good contributor to the forums I like many value Miros views on things as we do with a lot of the community.
However the moderators just enforce the forum rules and can't be seen to discriminate between forum users I'm sure you appreciate the value of this, they have rules to follow like we all do.
However I have waffled on enough lets let the topic get back to it original theme

Kind Regards all
IPaul72
Subject: Haydi Bulalım - Alman
Link on message: #5647057
Link on message: #5647057
Ishtara: Yeni topluluk katılımcımız lantirn161'in hazırladığı ilk
yarışma!
Son Katılım zamanı 25 Ağustos 2013 saat 12.00!
Bu yarışma herkese açıktır.
Merhaba arkadaşlar,
Yeni yarışmamız Haydi Bulalım başlıyor. Amacımız harf tablosu içinde verilen ve Almanların 2.Dünya Savaşında kullanmış olduğu herhangi bir zırhlı aracın ismini bulmak. Başlamadan önce lütfen kuralları dikkatlice okuyunuz.
KURALLAR
1. Toplam 20 tane kelime ve 1 özel kelime tabloya gizlenmiştir. Şans eseri oluşan kelimeler (KV, IS, ST gibi) dikkate alınmayacaktır.
2. Bulmacadaki kelimeler sadece WoT içinde yeralan tank isimlerinden oluşmayıp, Alman Ordusu tarafından 2.Dünya Savaşında kullanmış olan zırhlı araç (Tanklar, yarı paletli araçlar, tekerlekli araç, tank tipi vb) isimlerinden de seçilmiştir.
3. Bulmacada yeralan kelimeler; özel isimlerden, kısaltmalardan, takma isimlerden, resmi isimlerden oluşabilir.
4. Her bir katılımcı bulacağı sadece 1 adet kelimeden 100 altın ödül kazanacaktır. Bununla birlikte her katılımcı sadece bir defa özel kelimeyi tahmin edebilir ve özel kelimeyi doğru bulan ilk katılımcı ekstra 200 altın ödül kazanacaktır. Özel kelimenin bulmaca üzerinde gösterilmesi zorunludur. Küçük bir ipucu; özel kelime 3 harfli bir kısaltmadan oluşmaktadır.
5. Birden fazla kelimeyi yazan yarışmacının sadece ilk yazdığı cevap dikkate alınacak, diğer yanıtları geçersiz sayılacaktır.
6. Aynı kelimeyi yazan katılımcılardan hangisi önce yazmışsa onun cevabı doğru kabul edilecektir. Bu hususta gönderilen mesajların tarih ve saatleri kontrol edilecek, büyük bir şans eseri aynı saatte (örneğin 25 Ağustos 11.00) gönderilen mesajlarda savaş sayısı fazla olan katılımcının cevabı dikkate alınacaktır.
7. Bulunan kelimenin tablo üzerinde işaretli olarak gösterilmesi zorunludur.
Herkese iyi şanslar...
![]()
Son Katılım zamanı 25 Ağustos 2013 saat 12.00!
Bu yarışma herkese açıktır.
Merhaba arkadaşlar,
Yeni yarışmamız Haydi Bulalım başlıyor. Amacımız harf tablosu içinde verilen ve Almanların 2.Dünya Savaşında kullanmış olduğu herhangi bir zırhlı aracın ismini bulmak. Başlamadan önce lütfen kuralları dikkatlice okuyunuz.
KURALLAR
1. Toplam 20 tane kelime ve 1 özel kelime tabloya gizlenmiştir. Şans eseri oluşan kelimeler (KV, IS, ST gibi) dikkate alınmayacaktır.
2. Bulmacadaki kelimeler sadece WoT içinde yeralan tank isimlerinden oluşmayıp, Alman Ordusu tarafından 2.Dünya Savaşında kullanmış olan zırhlı araç (Tanklar, yarı paletli araçlar, tekerlekli araç, tank tipi vb) isimlerinden de seçilmiştir.
3. Bulmacada yeralan kelimeler; özel isimlerden, kısaltmalardan, takma isimlerden, resmi isimlerden oluşabilir.
4. Her bir katılımcı bulacağı sadece 1 adet kelimeden 100 altın ödül kazanacaktır. Bununla birlikte her katılımcı sadece bir defa özel kelimeyi tahmin edebilir ve özel kelimeyi doğru bulan ilk katılımcı ekstra 200 altın ödül kazanacaktır. Özel kelimenin bulmaca üzerinde gösterilmesi zorunludur. Küçük bir ipucu; özel kelime 3 harfli bir kısaltmadan oluşmaktadır.
5. Birden fazla kelimeyi yazan yarışmacının sadece ilk yazdığı cevap dikkate alınacak, diğer yanıtları geçersiz sayılacaktır.
6. Aynı kelimeyi yazan katılımcılardan hangisi önce yazmışsa onun cevabı doğru kabul edilecektir. Bu hususta gönderilen mesajların tarih ve saatleri kontrol edilecek, büyük bir şans eseri aynı saatte (örneğin 25 Ağustos 11.00) gönderilen mesajlarda savaş sayısı fazla olan katılımcının cevabı dikkate alınacaktır.
7. Bulunan kelimenin tablo üzerinde işaretli olarak gösterilmesi zorunludur.
Herkese iyi şanslar...
Subject: All things done in moderation
Link on message: #5646677
Costarring, on 21 August 2013 - 10:35 AM, said: Not going into specifics, but moderation on these forums is rather
arbitrary.
(moderators make up new forum rules on the go... when it suits them)
gialege, on 21 August 2013 - 10:41 AM, said: agree, accord, tally, fall in with, consort with, jibe +1
In this case moderator was, rude, discourteous, impolite, indelicate, unmannerly, ignoble.
Link on message: #5646677

(moderators make up new forum rules on the go... when it suits them)
IPaul72: Hello there Costarring
The moderators try to do a difficult job on here I know I used to be one.
However, if a moderator is acting outside the rules this is something we definitely need to know about. The moderator is there to enforce forum rules and not break them.
If you ever feel that a moderator is breaking the rules please see here:
4. FORUM ADMINISTRATION and MODERATION
4.1 Administrators and Community Team
Administrators are Wargaming.net employees.
The administrator status is confirmed by “Group: Administrators” inscription under the user nickname.
Community Team is presented by "Community Managers" and "Community Coordinators"
4.2 Moderators
Moderators are volunteers of forum administration. Recruited from forum members, the moderators are responsible for maintenance of forum rules.
The moderator status is confirmed by “Group: Moderator” and Senior Moderator inscription under the user nickname.
4.3 Administrators and Moderators’ powers
Administrators and moderators have right to warn and suspend forum members in the case of forum rules violation. Any measures taken by moderators can be appealed to support via the website (http://support.worldoftanks.eu), in accordance with the established procedure. Measures taken by administration are not subject to appeal. In some cases, which go beyond the forum rules, administrators can warn or suspend particular forum member, even if their actions formally don’t fall under the current prohibitions and restrictions.
4.4 Warnings
The warnings and official notifications are set off in red, this font color is reserved by Moderators and Administrators. Any other moderators and administrators’ message is considered to be an ordinary one and is equal to a message of any forum member. Once one of a posts has been moderated, users are not permitted to edit the moderators notes placed within the post. Similarly, the impersonation of the administration or moderating team in any way, is not permitted.
Depending on the severity of the violated rule, players may be issued with a different amount of warning points:
Educational Warning - 0 warning point
Minor Rule Violation - 1 warning point
Average Rule Violation - 2 warning points
Severe Rule Violation - 3 warning points
The maximum amount of warning points is 10. After reaching this limit, players should expect to receive a full forum suspension.
4.5 Restrictions on Administrators and Moderators
Administrators and support staff being official employee's are representatives of Wargaming.net, are allowed to play but not partake in clans and clan wars.
Moderators however are not official employee's of Wargaming.net and recruited from the player base. They have no special abilities in game to give them any advantage, other than the ability to issue chat bans within the game. So there is no need to limit moderators participation within clans or clan-wars. If users believe a moderator to be biased in any way or acted inappropriately, they are to send the details to support via the website (http://support.worldoftanks.eu) and it shall be looked at and dealt with by administrators if needed.
This is from the forum rules which can be found here.
The moderators try to do a difficult job on here I know I used to be one.
However, if a moderator is acting outside the rules this is something we definitely need to know about. The moderator is there to enforce forum rules and not break them.
If you ever feel that a moderator is breaking the rules please see here:
4. FORUM ADMINISTRATION and MODERATION
4.1 Administrators and Community Team
Administrators are Wargaming.net employees.
The administrator status is confirmed by “Group: Administrators” inscription under the user nickname.
Community Team is presented by "Community Managers" and "Community Coordinators"
4.2 Moderators
Moderators are volunteers of forum administration. Recruited from forum members, the moderators are responsible for maintenance of forum rules.
The moderator status is confirmed by “Group: Moderator” and Senior Moderator inscription under the user nickname.
4.3 Administrators and Moderators’ powers
Administrators and moderators have right to warn and suspend forum members in the case of forum rules violation. Any measures taken by moderators can be appealed to support via the website (http://support.worldoftanks.eu), in accordance with the established procedure. Measures taken by administration are not subject to appeal. In some cases, which go beyond the forum rules, administrators can warn or suspend particular forum member, even if their actions formally don’t fall under the current prohibitions and restrictions.
4.4 Warnings
The warnings and official notifications are set off in red, this font color is reserved by Moderators and Administrators. Any other moderators and administrators’ message is considered to be an ordinary one and is equal to a message of any forum member. Once one of a posts has been moderated, users are not permitted to edit the moderators notes placed within the post. Similarly, the impersonation of the administration or moderating team in any way, is not permitted.
Depending on the severity of the violated rule, players may be issued with a different amount of warning points:
Educational Warning - 0 warning point
Minor Rule Violation - 1 warning point
Average Rule Violation - 2 warning points
Severe Rule Violation - 3 warning points
The maximum amount of warning points is 10. After reaching this limit, players should expect to receive a full forum suspension.
4.5 Restrictions on Administrators and Moderators
Administrators and support staff being official employee's are representatives of Wargaming.net, are allowed to play but not partake in clans and clan wars.
Moderators however are not official employee's of Wargaming.net and recruited from the player base. They have no special abilities in game to give them any advantage, other than the ability to issue chat bans within the game. So there is no need to limit moderators participation within clans or clan-wars. If users believe a moderator to be biased in any way or acted inappropriately, they are to send the details to support via the website (http://support.worldoftanks.eu) and it shall be looked at and dealt with by administrators if needed.
This is from the forum rules which can be found here.

In this case moderator was, rude, discourteous, impolite, indelicate, unmannerly, ignoble.
IPaul72: Hello there gialege
All I can do at the moment is have a word with the moderator responsible and apologise on their behalf.
Kind Regards all
IPaul72
All I can do at the moment is have a word with the moderator responsible and apologise on their behalf.
Kind Regards all
IPaul72
Subject: Jaunais statistikas topiks :)
Link on message: #5634054
Link on message: #5634054
OldFox: Ludzu, beidziet diskutet par moderatora sankcijam, jo par to var
dabut vel vienu bridinajumu. Ja jums ir pretenzijas, jus varat visu
noskaidrot privata vai aizsutit sudzibu supporta.
Subject: Jaunais statistikas topiks :)
Link on message: #5631736
Latviets, on 19 August 2013 - 09:44 AM, said: [EDITED] Ej Tu nost, cipari iespaidīgi. Bet viģikā neko pārdabisku
nesakatiju. vienīgi, man tā nesanāk :) Redzēju to, ka karti
perfekti pārzini, to, ka ne**** (nevar kārtīgi izteikties, atkal
dabūšu brīdinājumu ) Visu laiku tikai močī.... Būs vel jāskatas, kā
to dari. Pats, ja ta mēginu, tad dabonu ātri bietē...

Kāda draņķa pēc man atkal brīdinajums?? tie bija izsauksmes sajūsmas vārdi, pie tam cenzēti. Laikam tas kurš rediģē, spēj izlasīt caur zvaigznītēm dzēstus burtus,
Tad varbūt šeit arī ir rupjš vārds ? ''P....S. ?? PIRKSTS taču nav rupjš ne ? bet dod tik treso brīdinājumu, jo Tu, atbildīgais droši vien tur saskati rupju lamu vārdu !!! Katrs skatās pēc savas samitātības pakapes
Tulit vel dabušu ceturto punktu, jo apšaubu moderatora lēmumus, kas ir pret saistošajiem foruma noteikumiem. Iedod vel bonusā vel kādus pāris punktus
Link on message: #5631736


Kāda draņķa pēc man atkal brīdinajums?? tie bija izsauksmes sajūsmas vārdi, pie tam cenzēti. Laikam tas kurš rediģē, spēj izlasīt caur zvaigznītēm dzēstus burtus,
Tad varbūt šeit arī ir rupjš vārds ? ''P....S. ?? PIRKSTS taču nav rupjš ne ? bet dod tik treso brīdinājumu, jo Tu, atbildīgais droši vien tur saskati rupju lamu vārdu !!! Katrs skatās pēc savas samitātības pakapes

Tulit vel dabušu ceturto punktu, jo apšaubu moderatora lēmumus, kas ir pret saistošajiem foruma noteikumiem. Iedod vel bonusā vel kādus pāris punktus
OldFox: Pirmkart, nevajag telot nevainibu - visi ir labi sapratusi, ko Jus
gribejat teikt "aiz zvaigznitem".
Otrkart, moderesanas reglamenta ir tads termins ka "завуалированный мат", kurs ir aizlegts ta pat, ka atklatais "mats". Protams, Jus to nezinajat, bet likuma nezinasana neatbrivo no atbildibas. Nedriks lamaties foruma, it ipasi ar svesvalodas vardiem.
Treskart, sakara ar to, ka Jus nebijat lietas kursa par sim niansem, par diskusiju ar moderatoru soreiz nesodisu. Turpmak ludzu visus stridigus jautajumus apspriest ar mani caur privatiem zinojumiem.
Otrkart, moderesanas reglamenta ir tads termins ka "завуалированный мат", kurs ir aizlegts ta pat, ka atklatais "mats". Protams, Jus to nezinajat, bet likuma nezinasana neatbrivo no atbildibas. Nedriks lamaties foruma, it ipasi ar svesvalodas vardiem.
Treskart, sakara ar to, ka Jus nebijat lietas kursa par sim niansem, par diskusiju ar moderatoru soreiz nesodisu. Turpmak ludzu visus stridigus jautajumus apspriest ar mani caur privatiem zinojumiem.
Subject: Klan Seferleri Hakkında Önerileriniz
Link on message: #5628533
Link on message: #5628533
Ishtara: Herkese tekrardan merhabalar,
Konu hakkında tüm geri bildirimleriniz klan bölümüne iletildi. Şu an resmi bilgi paylaşımı yapamıyorum fakat çok yakın zamanda yeni klan seferleri sistemi açıklanacak. Bazılarınızı sevindirecek değişiklikler olacağını söyleyebilirim ama herkesi memnun etmek tabi ki imkansız olacak.
Konu hakkında hepinizi güncel tutmak adına yazıyorum bu yorumu, seferlerin yeni sistemi açıklandığı zaman tekrar konuşmak üzere.
İyi forumlar
Ishtara
Konu hakkında tüm geri bildirimleriniz klan bölümüne iletildi. Şu an resmi bilgi paylaşımı yapamıyorum fakat çok yakın zamanda yeni klan seferleri sistemi açıklanacak. Bazılarınızı sevindirecek değişiklikler olacağını söyleyebilirim ama herkesi memnun etmek tabi ki imkansız olacak.
Konu hakkında hepinizi güncel tutmak adına yazıyorum bu yorumu, seferlerin yeni sistemi açıklandığı zaman tekrar konuşmak üzere.
İyi forumlar
Ishtara
Subject: [RG] Rush'n'Glory
Link on message: #5627486
Link on message: #5627486
OldFox: Информация имеет очень высокую степень достоверности.
Subject: [GLX] Galaxy Project
Link on message: #5620179
Link on message: #5620179
OldFox: Тему почистил, скоро начну зверствовать.
Subject: Clan Wars Tank Lock
Link on message: #5616323
Link on message: #5616323
Decept1on: The freezing time is like this now :
- For an Attacking clan in case of a province capture
http://imageshack.us...4/5554/h1gh.png
- For all other battles and results

This looks weird but it is like that, it will updated on the portal asap, the freezing time might change in an upcoming patch.
Note: Do not see any sign of getting T9 and/or T10 light tanks, it is just filled, it does not mean the tank exists and/or planned ;)
- For an Attacking clan in case of a province capture
http://imageshack.us...4/5554/h1gh.png
- For all other battles and results

This looks weird but it is like that, it will updated on the portal asap, the freezing time might change in an upcoming patch.
Note: Do not see any sign of getting T9 and/or T10 light tanks, it is just filled, it does not mean the tank exists and/or planned ;)
Subject: Донбасская операция 1943
Link on message: #5615868
Link on message: #5615868
OldFox: Тему почистил. Прошу флудить в Спам-уголке.
Subject: [GLX] Galaxy Project
Link on message: #5615867
Link on message: #5615867
OldFox: Тему почистил, наказания раздал. Читаем "Правила ведения
рекрут-тем" и не нарушаем их.
Subject: мистер Фокс
Link on message: #5615852
Link on message: #5615852
OldFox: Уточню, если ответят - возможно, не решили еще, возможно,
информация "ДСП". Но все равно рано или поздно эти станет ясно. Вы
хотите получить какие-то законные выгоды от обладания данной
информацией раньше других или просто любопытство?
Реклама | Adv