Developers posts on forum

Subject: So, how are you doing on the gold car questline?
Link on message: #16684834

distrofijus, on 25 February 2019 - 07:02 PM, said:   There's a fine difference between making it too easy - e.g.,  anyone can do it given enough time like stug IV marathon, etc. The obj260 is pipe dream for a lot of players.   However ramping up requirements so much that average player must commit very seriously just to finish (especially last missions) and then throwing in some discounts for a premium - let's call the things what they are. And this is just another marketing stint (people after spending some time and unable to finish grind, don't want to waste their time or whatever and decide to buy a tank with discount).   You can call it challenge, say something about "non-zero effort" tank. But any serious person will laugh in your face for statement like this.


IncandescentGerbil, on 26 February 2019 - 10:51 AM, said: The introduction of armoured rally cars was the thing that prevented me from giving the game another try. Does anyone at WG appreciate how ridiculous it makes their game look, from the outside? I am embarrassed to tell anyone I used to play this game nowadays.


Bora_BOOM, on 26 February 2019 - 12:52 PM, said: 1.) Not into wheels at all. 2.) Stronk lvl. 7 requirements. Much grind. 3.) Wallet closed.   Exactly as Klaus Kellerman would say: No tank for you!

Subject: Daily Tournaments - Q&A - Post your questions here!
Link on message: #16684661

Subject: Daily Tournaments - Information & Updates
Link on message: #16684657

Subject: Nezapomeňte si vyzvednout své balíčky Twitch
Link on message: #16684653

Subject: Pojďte se s námi podívat na speciály na březen
Link on message: #16684607

guthas, on 26 February 2019 - 09:39 AM, said: Ty sstyx. Bylo by možno zjistit, jestli se dotyční zaměstnanci odpovědní za překlad a publikování novinek pohybují i zde na fórum?

Já jestli náhodou čtou i to co jim hráči píšou, případně jestli se k nim dostává zpětná vazba.. Tedy do toho mikrokosmu ve kterém žijí.   To ti bohužel nemůžu prozradit, to je potřeba na Káju Ne všechny věci můžu prozrazovat a to i když je jsem schopná zjistit nebo i když můžu znát odpověď ( o zaměstnancích ) , tady u tohoto si nejsem jistá co můžu


Sstyx, on 26 February 2019 - 10:08 AM, said:

Subject: How would you solve current gameplay issues (MM, tank imbalance, etc) in WoT?
Link on message: #16684556

Ace42X, on 25 February 2019 - 06:40 PM, said:   Eh, Riot were always unhappy about the Runes system, and eventually (way overdue, admittedly) ditched it because of how unhealthy it was for the game.  Not sure that's a good example of "they all do it".  Persistent runes are materially different to one-use consumables too; grinding out runes represents progress, grinding out credits to blow on chocolate / gold ammo does not.
Runes would be more comparable to spending credits on coated lenses, etc - something no-one's complaining about here to the best of my knowledge.   Unlocking champions with a grind is a non-issue, and not comparable to OP premiums that can't be ground out at all.  Coincidentally, champions go down in grind-cost as time goes on.  OP champions can be banned via a pick-and-ban system to limit their potential to impact the game; and are nerfed pretty frequently (Anyone remember when the reworked Gangplank was dominant at Worlds like 4 years ago or something?  Don't think he even lasted into the start of the subsequent season?)

I don't think your comparison is fair, I'd say WG's monetisation is pretty cynical in a number of ways, I'd argue way worse than LoL's; but of course you're right to point out that WoW isn't F2P and thus isn't comparable.     If the game is intrinsically fun, then "doing it all" isn't an issue.  People still play football in the park without "introducing new content."

Do you not think there's a moral question at work here if people are being manipulated into playing a game which is no longer fun by using cynical marketing ploys?  Shouldn't the focus instead be on making the core experience enjoyable - IE not so boring that people don't want to do it some more?
 


Gremlin182, on 25 February 2019 - 07:32 PM, said: With the MM I thought the solution was just to revert to the prior MM, however WG have commented that there has been a shift in numbers of tanks at some tiers and this is the problem. So how about a normal matchmaker like we were used to but the option of a single tier game to drain off excess numbers. Its difficult to come up with solutions if you don't know specifics.   The MM seems a little better since the last update maybe because more players are grinding the Armoured Cars so filling out tiers 6 and 7 or maybe front Line drained off a lot of tier 8 tanks. Fact remains if too many of us are playing a particular type or tier there is little the MM can do.   Premium ammo There is some logic to reducing the damage for some premium ammo a 75mm APCR shell has an approximately 56mm core so it could be argued it does similar damage to a 56mm shell maybe 110 damage instead of 150. Problems 1 there are none premium APCR shells should their damage be reduced too. 2 Some tanks need to use Premium shells more than others either because they are undergunned or in their stock form. This would make stock grinds much more expensive and some tanks even with their top gun less effective those tanks will become much less popular.   A better idea might be to leave the damage as it is but emphasise the differences of the types. They already have good and bad points just increase those so players need to choose the ammo type based on target angle range etc.    


Laatikkomafia, on 25 February 2019 - 07:50 PM, said:   I have played League since season 4 (2014) IP grinding didn't take that long. I ended up with 12 rune pages and the champions I like to play. The only time I have spent money on League has been when I bought skins, that give no advantage.   If LoL had WoT's economy model, you would be able to buy champions that start the match at level 11 instead of level 1.


LordMuffin, on 25 February 2019 - 09:10 PM, said: WoT release : 2011 LoL release: 2009 Dota 2: release 2013 Warframe 2013   The new champions get nerfed if they are to good. Defender doesn't get nerfed.   And you don't need to add new content which are superior to the old content if the game is good.   Dota 2 and LoL have way less (none) p2w aspects. WoT have plenty where Defender is one of them.


Squirting_Elephant, on 25 February 2019 - 09:11 PM, said: You make some good points. In fact I don't know why I didn't think about that when I posted that... Yeah scrap the garage and the thing about the premiums and a few others indeed. After all, WG is not a charity. Same with customizing tanks I guess. I think it would be fun and add a lot of extra playstyles. But the development & balance costs would be insanely high. Too high... But maybe some simple things like giving us the option to carry more ammo at the cost of engine ratio & max-speed. Changes like going open/closed roof is probably asked too much but many tanks could have been so awesome if I could just change them a tiny tiny bit. The changes we have now in the research tree are mostly no-brainers, just take the highest tier gun, engine, etc. There is no real customization. Crew skills and modules don't change enough + it's usually the same for every tank: 6th sense, BIA, gun rammer, vents. And a camo net doesn't exactly hide my JagdTiger the size of a house behind a bush, maybe if I could strip some of it's armor...   About garage: I was originally thinking something like a customizable garage with unlockables (decorations, different hangars, music, name it) that you can earn/buy/grind where you can also display tanks along with some plate with stats that your friends/guildies/public can visit. Basically show-off and maybe something you could even drive in while the MM is searching or when creating a team for stronghold (takes long) so you all spawn in somebody's garage. I'm always alt-tabbed out currently after joining because, boring takes long and I alt-tab back when WoT flashes red. Current garages are terrible imo as is most of the garage-GUI. But yeah it would cost a lot of dev-time, drains more performance for toaster PC's and not sure if other players even want something like that anyway. It does return something but probably not enough. The idea is probably bad anyway.   But at least the tanks should be available for purchase then: Say I encounter a Defender and I think it's op or fun (whether it really is or not is not the point) and I also want to get one to level the playing field. Oh wait I can't because it's not in the shop currently and god knows when, if ever, it will return. This mechanic I find really ugh... If I encounter an enemy tank, I should be able to either grind or buy it at any point during the year. Not to mention tanks that got retired and are never available again, yet I still have to fight them even though I never can get to learn them myself. Can't get/buy it... Feels left out and sometimes plain unfair. But yeah marketing reasons, making something limited and changing the shop all the time to attract attention and etc. etc. I get it... But I'm not happy with it!     But maybe spall liner buff, medkit nerf, good gold ammo nerf and something to stop that stupid bumrushing & yolo-rewarding.   Also I kinda miss an FAQ with common ideas and why they are not implemented so we understand it better. I'm sure most have been answered over time. Example: Q: Why are premium tanks not equal or lesser compared to grindeable tanks? A: Because we need to sell a different game experience and do our best to balance them and sometimes it goes wrong or meta shifts over time and we can't change the premium tanks because players would go mad over it. (or something)   And other common questions like: Why can't we blacklist maps, why gold ammo, why 2 tier difference in mm, why 3 arties, etc. WG must have valid reasons but I/we don't understand them.    


Derethim, on 25 February 2019 - 09:46 PM, said:   Warframe still has more players and isn't pay to win, also doesen't fall into any of your categories. LoL and DOTA are MOBAs as well, yet the rune pages don't affect the gameplay - they are NOT pay  two win, so it's pay to progress, which WoT is, but it's also pay to win. See the point?   There are 0 pay to win elements in LoL and DOTA. They are the same genre of a game, just slightly different - but in WoT you also have predetermined Heavy lanes, light lanes, TD spots, arty spots because of small maps.


LordMuffin, on 25 February 2019 - 09:55 PM, said:   No you don't, if you have a good game you will still have players in it.  Though if the game becomes crap, then new content is probably the only rescue.   The reason to play WoT is to have fun. And that reason is not prevented by having less content implemented each year. 


IncandescentGerbil, on 25 February 2019 - 11:28 PM, said: Game is far too broken to ever be fixed. The only question is how quickly WG will kill it.   Of course, if it's player retention they are after, getting rid of artillery would have had a far greater effect than introducing armoured rally cars... 

Subject: Bullies and idiots in game gets you punished?
Link on message: #16684231

Subject: Tekerlekler Üstünde Sınama Çıkıyor
Link on message: #16684220

zed_x, on 25 February 2019 - 11:27 PM, said:   Bu bir sınama, eyvallah. Peki bu tankı beğenmeyen, etkinliklerle ilgilenmeyen insanlar neden bu sınamanın ceremesini çekmek zorunda? Bu seferki "sınamanız" mevcut tankı isteyen istemeyen herkes için kanser sebebi olmuş kusura bakmayın. İsteyen oyunculara bu sınamayı bir görev kabulu şeklinde açsaydınız da MM ve RNG bu tankla ilgilenmeyen oyuncuların da oyununu zehir edecek şekilde çalışmasaydı.

Subject: I might lost the battle, but ...
Link on message: #16684156

Subject: Searching for a competitive international clan (2500 wn8)
Link on message: #16684142

Subject: EBR Hotch...Is it really so bad in passive scouting? Try 2.
Link on message: #16684136

Subject: Totally demoralized
Link on message: #16684086

Ace42X, on 25 February 2019 - 06:30 PM, said:   Unless you want a free premium tank, in which case you've got to grind grind grind, even at the cost of your sanity, eyesight, health.


Kicky92, on 25 February 2019 - 06:33 PM, said: It happens, take a week long break, come back and blow things up when you're refreshed   WG will never add the PvE mode that the community is begging for - which would help player frustration at times like these. 


Alfa_Tau, on 25 February 2019 - 10:34 PM, said:   Why? WG in the developers diaries promised to fix it SOOOON.  22:41 Added after 6 minutes   Well in my opinion gold ammo is an unfortunate necessity. I try not to use it BUT WG has buffed so much the armor of many tanks that sometime there is no choice. 

Subject: What makes WOT great
Link on message: #16682869

Subject: Game ruined with wheeled op tanks
Link on message: #16682832

Subject: remove wheeled vehicles
Link on message: #16682819

Subject: So, how are you doing on the gold car questline?
Link on message: #16682806

ThorgrimBrenadim, on 25 February 2019 - 05:59 PM, said:   And this is the problem we face when trying to get wargamming to fix the serious issues in this game. I have run enough marathons in my day yes they are tough but such is the nature of that challenge, a game marathon should STILL be fun should be within reach of the vast majority of players now imagine a major marathon closing the finishing gate at say 4hrs. Now a runner will complete that and for some quite easily but for others it will be a tough challenge that pushes them and yet for others impossible. A game should not have an impossible element to it but hey hold on the race organisers say pay us some more money and we will give you the medal anyway ! Now imagine the complaints the race would be shown up and so embarrassed they change the policy. Wargamming have no such shame and it is part because of players like you thinking me, me, me, rather than the whole player base. Even the worst player in this game should be able to get the tank it will just take them longer they should not feel pressurised to complete a marathon in under 4hrs when the best they can do is 6hrs. So a long lasting OR difficult task or activity NOT an impossible one and for some players it is impossible.

Subject: insults and chatbans: question to WG
Link on message: #16682800

AliceUnchained, on 25 February 2019 - 06:07 PM, said:   But what exactly is the difference? Both can be considered offensive, both can be considering merely expressing an opinion. And while arguable subjective, both can be considered speaking the truth (or at least a truth). Don't get me wrong, I have no issues with expressing the way you did. But the notion that calling a spade a spade is fine as long as you don't point at it, doesn't fly with me around here. Stating that tip toeing the line can be completely safe is true to some extend, as it all boils down to whether or not someone clicks the 'report' button (which could simply be out of spite), and the rather inconsistent, subjective moderation around here. As you can find yourself sanctioned weeks later, or even years later as the necro'd thread from yesterday demonstrated: rather then lock and junk the thread, the moderator opted to edit a post from 2016 in it...      Try reasoning with moderation on this, you won't get anywhere. And that's the point I'm trying to make with eekeeboo. You can sugarcoat it any way you want, claim that it wasn't directed at any one, and still end up sanctioned just because someone hit that 'report' button. Moreover, you can even get another sanction on top of it simply trying to discuss it. 

Subject: How would you solve current gameplay issues (MM, tank imbalance, etc) in WoT?
Link on message: #16682782

Squirting_Elephant, on 25 February 2019 - 03:53 PM, said: 1. Premium tanks should never be stronger than their non-premium version. Instead I would give them more customizable options and less repair/ammo costs only. Even same hit-models. 2. Nerf gold ammo. Like yeah the upcomming damage nerf but imo more than 30%. Also get rid of those high pen-values for medium tanks. Why do medium tanks need to have 320pen... They are supposed to flank, scout and aim at weakspots. They shouldn't have the same pen as a TD and reliably pen a well armored heavy tank frontally across the battlefield! I'd give them slightly less pen than a heavy tank. 3. No more than 1 tier difference for MM for the busier regions and only extend the tier difference if there aren't enough players online. 4. Make teamwork even more rewarding. Right now there is still a lot of 'damage-stealing' and yoloing and various other suicidal tactics going on just to steal/get some extra damage before match ends. 5. Make capping more important in Random Battles. Now sometimes a 3 minutes match is extended to 8 minutes just because my whole team is chasing down that last scout that is racing for it's live across the map instead of capping not to mention certain other nonsense. Especially when you play arty you just get bored sometimes of how your team chases down some minor enemy to the point you start capping yourself and afk in cap. 6. First aid kits should only half the stun duration instead of totally remove it. 7. Buff spall liners. 8. No more 'limited tanks'. Everybody should be able to grind/buy all tanks that can appear through the MM in battles. 9. Tier 9 premiums. 10. Allow to pause premium subscription at the cost of 2 premium days. 11. Only count boosters for time spent in battle. 12. Customizable garage (not through mods). And so much more... 15:56 Added after 3 minutes Oh and more customizable options for each tank. Like being able to adjust your armor a tiny bit (maybe less side armor and more roof armor?) and various other balances that allow me to customize my tanks more to my playstyle. Maybe trade in some alpha on the T95 for some more mobility. Of course nothing of this will ever happen...


250swb, on 25 February 2019 - 06:13 PM, said: Solving the problem is really easy, two things, quit the hype with marathons and 'events', quit with the 'new content' until the basic problems like MM have been solved. Too much is going on, the game is a stress fest of hype, calm it down, make it stable.

Subject: How would you solve current gameplay issues (MM, tank imbalance, etc) in WoT?
Link on message: #16682768

Derethim, on 25 February 2019 - 03:02 PM, said: What Wargaming doesen't realize - having a fun game, that is balanced and not Pay2Win i.e. World of Warcraft, Warframe, DOTA2, LoL and many other titles, makes more money, than trying to milk every last € from their thrash product, like EA does it.

Subject: Totally demoralized
Link on message: #16682763

Subject: Dongers=XXX1 kings of xxx it seems..
Link on message: #16682757

BravelyRanAway, on 25 February 2019 - 05:09 PM, said: Do WG accept the dong as a unit of currency on the SEA server....or have WG instructed the Vietnamese community that they will not handle the dong?


Long_Range_Sniper, on 25 February 2019 - 05:11 PM, said:   In which case have you requested that "D0NG" has been globally searched on your system and changes initiated accordingly? I can see a few players who will wonder why their names get changed but if you have determined DONG is now an offensive and suggestive term then you can't really leave it out there offending people? There are in fact loads of derivatives of other slang words on your servers and are you saying you only act on reports?     Two parts of an organisation who interact with players and they don't have a connection?   Eeh, ya daft ha'peths, cos owt's better'n nowt.


Jumping_Turtle, on 25 February 2019 - 05:50 PM, said:   That is sad. You know it is not offensive but still the complainers get what they want.

Subject: The Big SPG Discussion Thread
Link on message: #16682746

GANDALF_WOT, on 25 February 2019 - 01:08 AM, said: So much discussions about SPG but we never have here official answer, even not from moderator, why players can not have choice in game setting or mod: YES MM with SPG or NO MM without SPG?

Subject: Frontlines Feedback
Link on message: #16682647

Subject: VOTE against wheeled tonks. Lets make wot great again.
Link on message: #16682595

Subject: insults and chatbans: question to WG
Link on message: #16682590

AliceUnchained, on 22 February 2019 - 06:04 PM, said:   The common sense in that when I would state ' I think this forum is full of cretins', it is considered fine and dandy, whereas stating 'I think you're a cretin' is suddenly considered offensive and in violation of forum rules? Sorry eek, but I disagree with you here.      And yet the similarity being that Support stated in both cases a thorough investigation had taken place, which could easily be proven to be complete and utter BS. In both cases. If Support actually had checked the Chat Log, they would not have brought up a date in which I supposedly violated the game rules but I did not play a single game (and no one else has access to this account). More importantly, previously Support refused to look at the replays I was willing to provide (I had all of them) and while the Replay Analyzer Data would have sufficed. So I personally do not believe for one second that any proper, let alone thorough, investigation is done.   Oh and apples can have both yellow and red color, they're not all too far off from orange ;-) However, let's leave it at this. I have no intention of 'attacking' you about this, I have no quarrel with you, I do appreciate your efforts and responses (and overall activity, kudos), and I am also quite aware this suspension will not be reverted nor that Wargaming will ever admit they fudged up massively back then.


BlackBloodBandit, on 22 February 2019 - 07:47 PM, said: This doesn't make sense, when half the player base will ignore it and not say anything or doesn't even understand English at all.


LordMuffin, on 24 February 2019 - 07:00 AM, said:   Can I use the word cretin (or other similar words) directed at a group of people? Example: The WG customer support are cretins.   It is not targeted at anyone specific, so according to eekeeboo it seems OK.   

Subject: Nezapomeňte si vyzvednout své balíčky Twitch
Link on message: #16682528

Leeroy_YOLO, on 25 February 2019 - 05:44 PM, said:   Takže ta holčina, viz:     propadne 28.2. a ne 28.3. ? 

Subject: Reporting for Duty
Link on message: #16682525

the_nebuchadnezzar, on 23 February 2019 - 12:20 PM, said: @eekeeboo Any news about the bond shop? Now that the bond auction was a fail for me all I have left as an option is to get a tank or two from the shop.

Subject: Reclamad un paquete Cuidado Alfa con Twitch Prime
Link on message: #16682505

spectrun, on 25 February 2019 - 02:00 PM, said:   Es cierto el enlace; https://worldoftanks...twitch-package/ en los que aparecen dos paquetes para prime no lleva ningún lugar   ¿ Pueden solucionarlo ?   gracias

Subject: Empieza el Reto sobre ruedas
Link on message: #16682504

b0ng0_cat, on 25 February 2019 - 12:49 PM, said:   Acabo de darme cuenta de que he escrito mal tu nombre tio, lo siento mucho, estaba desde el movil y en esa pagina en concreto creo que no aparecias . Gracias por tomarlo en cuenta, seria una especie de incentivo para los equipos en los que vas perdiendo, al menos de no darlo por perdido todo ya que tambien podrias tener recompensa.

Subject: Preparaos para la batalla
Link on message: #16682501

Subject: No olvidéis canjear vuestros paquetes de Twitch
Link on message: #16682498

Thorsvald, on 25 February 2019 - 02:04 PM, said: Se puede conseguir todavia el alpha?

Subject: Dongers=XXX1 kings of xxx it seems..
Link on message: #16682492

Jumping_Turtle, on 25 February 2019 - 02:11 PM, said:   Why not, when someone who works at Wargaming says this :     I make of this that there is no problem with D0NG and the logo, only the clan description needs to be changed. I dont see why they should not get D0NG back.


Long_Range_Sniper, on 25 February 2019 - 02:40 PM, said:   Every day's a school day eh?     Of course it's an extreme strawman, it built on your original version of turning it into a life and death issue.     No.   Fochgate was about the actions and decisions of one employee (Ph3lan) and then the failure of the WG higher management structure to recognise that they had poor and inconsistent decisions and communications over a weekend which culminated in Jim Sterling doing a YouTube video calling the company all sorts of things. All of which could have been avoided if someone had apologised early and sorted it out.     Well it's nearly 4pm in Paris on a Monday, and the name hasn't been changed back to D0NG even after eek repeatedly pointing out that he's advised it's fine.   That doesn't seem intelligent, or good player support to me. Especially given this is a trending thread and 600+ people are on this part of the forum where it's been all day.   Eight hours during normal office hours and not one person in WG can change the name back......   D0NGATE has arrived.

Subject: Don't Forget to Redeem Your Twitch Packages
Link on message: #16682462

Punisher_GR_, on 25 February 2019 - 02:00 PM, said: Disapointment from WG again , seriusly you ask use to go there log ,link put card info make 2 accounts again link them with WG acc then free trial with credit card link and in the end no loot to choise 1 hour bs for nothing its funny that you put the BS in news to screw ppl over its like Aprils Fools Day with WG.


beroestz, on 25 February 2019 - 02:06 PM, said: My acc is linked at 27.10.2018 but I take twitch prime today because of the news bulletin. CAN I GET THE WOT LOOT OR NOT BECAUSE THERE IS NO WOT LOOT ON THE PAGE WITH THE LOOTS?


Ocelot_Shalashaska, on 25 February 2019 - 03:35 PM, said: is this some kind of an out or season april fool's joke? You remind us to take loot that is not there..... gj wargaming, you never fail to deliver


beroestz, on 25 February 2019 - 03:42 PM, said: Thank you Wargaming I activated twitch prime today, my acc is linked October, but there is no WOT loot and I paid for nothing  


Skorchev, on 25 February 2019 - 04:27 PM, said: me too...any help? Prime is activated...no loot...twitch is linked...everything is looking fine

Subject: Wheeled Vehicles: Take Them for a Spin!
Link on message: #16682450

Saar_Lion, on 22 February 2019 - 06:46 PM, said:   No, it isn't.   Companies strive to find new markets, not stagnate in old ones; to develop new customers, not milk their existing ones then drive them away.   These are things you'd know if you'd actually run a business, or been involved in marketing one.   But you carry on pretending you're doing a great job by forcing everyone into your Quake with Tanks arcade world, and giving them no options. Maybe WoT will end up being a few hundred bods seal clubbing in a Pz 1 C like you probably do.   Won't that be great? 

Subject: What’s Coming in 2019?
Link on message: #16682445

Griesgram_der_Grobe, on 24 February 2019 - 12:28 AM, said: almost two months in 2019...all they got is FL out of their spiderinfested basement and (as I´ve heard) at the same time have been successfully flippin´ it up with that wheeled nonsense...   maybe if I check back next christmas? I don´t wanna miss out on the latest announcements that remain in that state for eternity...   it would be funny if it wheren´t so sad...

Subject: Celebrate the Lunar New Year in World of Tanks
Link on message: #16682438

_Zenon, on 25 February 2019 - 11:36 AM, said:   There is so many missions, i usually look at them what tank they need and try to make them. There is a problem , some missions has - no vehicle available because you need to make that daily mision first.This daily mision restriction is a bad decision of developers.
Another thing i have seen in the missions- usually i end second requirements before the main requirement on campaign missions. Many times i get that mission tab in battle results because i have finish that secondary requirement again - why is in battle tab since i have finish them and there is no progress in that mission - this is a bad encoding and is annoying.
And another fail are that missions where you have to cap, so you need to mess up team game to make that mision - Wg you have no logic.

Subject: Fair Play Policy Update: February 2019
Link on message: #16682435

_HakunaMatata_, on 24 February 2019 - 10:51 AM, said:   Well, you can delete my comment. I know WG is communism and nothing else. Fact is that there is no other place where you can say something that community can agree on. You want me to go to RUSSIA TODAY channel? Give me a break. Why did you not answer my question. Why leave XVM active knowing it is destroying the game? Ahh wait, WG pays you to make them shine. Shame on you.

Subject: Get Ready for Battle
Link on message: #16682432

vaiderf1, on 25 February 2019 - 10:01 AM, said: I hate personal reserves. Why? Because when you use it, RNG and MM begins f**k up your game. Nonpenetration paper tanks, missing from 30 meters and bots and useless players in team.

Subject: Australian Centurion: the Mk. 5/1 RAAC
Link on message: #16682405

nightmare_sd, on 22 February 2019 - 10:45 PM, said: Have you even seen your page WG?!!!   What should we expect from the game when web page is disaster.  


T3CH89, on 24 February 2019 - 11:36 PM, said: Sooo..this means that the tank will be upside down in game to?..awesome..

Subject: Cure Your XP Fever
Link on message: #16682387

ToodlePips, on 23 February 2019 - 06:11 PM, said: What's the point of 10 extra XP for me if you can only use premium vehicles? I'd rather have 1k extra XP on a regular vehicle.   No thank you. Never have traded XP for gold, never will.


X_Warlock_X, on 23 February 2019 - 06:15 PM, said:  


Tureta, on 24 February 2019 - 01:22 PM, said:   Yep, more locked free xp, gold needed for unlocking, more $$ for WOT. This is a promotion for them, not for the players. At least remove that idiotic "blast through the Tech Tree" from the "promotion" message.