Developers posts on forum

Subject: WG don't abide by UK Law apparently
Link on message: #16747129

Miepie, on 21 March 2019 - 03:51 PM, said: I don't like Bono. Can we opt for either Pro Bonobo or Pro Bond instead?

Subject: WG + frag lab new f2p mmo shooting comming?
Link on message: #16747126

Subject: Habt ihr schon vom Lansen-Projekt gehört?
Link on message: #16747116

Schrotttank, on 21 March 2019 - 03:18 PM, said: Nein, nur WG. Ansonsten ist über einen Panzer Lansen nichts zu finden. Nur über einen Saab32 Lansen Flugzeug. Ist aber egal, bei dem was WG schon so alles an Unterlagen in den Kellern gefunden hat.      

Subject: Seriously WG? renaming a user because he has weed in his name...
Link on message: #16747115

Laatikkomafia, on 19 March 2019 - 05:48 PM, said: Should I be afraid? 


arthurwellsley, on 19 March 2019 - 06:16 PM, said:   In 2012, Wargaming's revenue was declared to be 217.9 million Euro, with a net profit of 6.1 million Euro.[22] Wargaming's shares were delisted from the Cyprus Stock Excahnge in 2015, and it remains a privately held company.   Frankly for a company that makes a six million profit on a two hundred and seventeen million turnover, WG can afford to spend more on customer support. I note when I go to the WG jobs page that WG are advertising Customer Support jobs in Minsk = https://wargaming.co...vacancy_995066/ I cannot speak the language so do not know how much the pay is for the Minsk job. Nor do I know where the English Speaking Customer Support is situated. Lets just assume it is Cyprus where the average yearly income is 21,936 euros (see https://tradingecono...om/cyprus/wages) and unemployment is averaging between 7-16%. If WG spent another 500,000 euros they could add another 16 or 17 CS agents to the payroll. With one million euros the number of new agents would double.   It is time WG spent more on CS so that each agent could spend more time assessing tickets and then issues such as EmeraldWeeds name would not end in a ban. 


Verblonde, on 19 March 2019 - 09:03 PM, said:   So we're letting Google define what words mean nowadays? I have a pretty low threshold for getting (mildly) annoyed by offensive nicknames in game - comes with being an old git - and I have to say Emerald's was pretty mild - surely you guys have better things to do than to mess about with accounts whose names call to mind (well to me, anyway) plants, possibly Irish ones, or perhaps a character from Molesworth ("weeds and wets" )? If you look at a reputable source for definitions of words' meanings (like the Oxford dictionary, rather than Google), the Cannabis usage is one of several associated meanings, and certainly not the primary one.   Presumably, to change said name from RenamedUser_xxxx will require gold? A cynic might think that WG might have an ulterior motive for hair-trigger name changing...?  


Laatikkomafia, on 19 March 2019 - 09:20 PM, said: Googling eekeeboo, this comes up:   A plane being flown in World of Warplanes.   I find that highly offensive.   Memeing and joking aside. I honestly think that if a name isn't directly offensive, like GetAID.. GetAssistances, AdolfWasCorrect and so on, they shouldn't be censored. ESRB has rated WoT for Teens. But as with every online game, "Online Interactions Not Rated by the ESRB (PC)"  

Subject: Czy słyszeliście kiedyś o Projekcie Lansen?
Link on message: #16747101

MeatGun, on 21 March 2019 - 03:39 PM, said: Nie, nigdy nie słyszałem.  

Subject: ¿Habéis oído hablar del Proyecto Lansen?
Link on message: #16747089

siremorti, on 21 March 2019 - 04:03 PM, said: Unas foticas y de 10!

Subject: La historia del Pz.Kpfw. IV en World of Tanks
Link on message: #16747087

Subject: Czy słyszeliście kiedyś o Projekcie Lansen?
Link on message: #16746954

MeatGun, on 21 March 2019 - 03:39 PM, said: Nie, nigdy nie słyszałem.  

Subject: ¿Habéis oído hablar del Proyecto Lansen?
Link on message: #16746952

Subject: WG don't abide by UK Law apparently
Link on message: #16746907

MistyBus, on 14 March 2019 - 04:45 PM, said:   are you sure you're reading the same post?   I stated a fact....something that actually happened....today....i haven't spoken about a claim, unless you're trying to be literal about it, then any comment anyone makes in here is a claim.


Grand_Moff_Tano, on 14 March 2019 - 04:51 PM, said:   Isn't that what you are doing? Repeating the same old crap, over and over and over again? No I do not work for WG, if I do then they've failed to send me my paycheck for the past 9 years. 


MistyBus, on 14 March 2019 - 05:38 PM, said:   ok, sorry, i just wanted all the abuse for while - i like it :-)   i bought a tank - 2 days later i decided WOT is broken beyond repair (EBRs, MM etc) and wanted my money back - the answer was that as i've used the tank (stats say 5 battles) so i can't have a refund. I asked several times why their rules outweigh Consumer Rights Act 2015 for digital goods - i wasn't really expecting the result to be in my favour, but my point was that they just avoided the question (multiple times) and then just closed the ticket before we could get to the bottom of it (even if it wasn't in my favour).   hope that makes sense?

Subject: Real names and locations. Are they offensive or not?
Link on message: #16746871

Subject: Tooday is my birthday
Link on message: #16746861

Subject: Retirement From The Forum
Link on message: #16746837

Subject: Retours concernant le rééquilibrage des cartes
Link on message: #16746820

Dart1759, on 20 March 2019 - 09:25 AM, said: Y aurait il quelqu'un qui a mis la main sur un petit résumé concernant ces fameux "ré-équilibrage" ? Pas moyen de trouver ça et il y a quand même 10 cartes modifiés....pour trouver les modifs IG, faut déjà un paquet de partie, et du bol !


Black_Nabla, on 20 March 2019 - 06:39 PM, said:   +1 Une vidéo serait bien mais bon...

Subject: ROFL
Link on message: #16746811

Subject: La Division Infernale LASALLE [LVGF2] recrute
Link on message: #16746799

Subject: Update 1.4.1 General feedback
Link on message: #16746753

Flint_74, on 20 March 2019 - 08:10 PM, said:   I'm well aware of how long 2019 is thank you very much, but I have to ask, who was demanding anything?   I simply asked three very reasonable questions that you didn't even have the common courtesy to acknowledge, much less respond to, not even to say that you'd pass them onto someone higher up who might have an answer to them, and instead you chose to get on your high horse and post a thoroughly unnecessary smartass sarcastic reply.   As for the FACT that I pointed out about the playerbase getting fed up, your attitude in your reply above sadly appears to be par for the course around here from the WG Staff on this forum, and that attitude is a big part of the reason why the playerbase IS getting fed up, because instead of engaging the playerbase in proper two-way conversation, and trying to answer our questions and concerns in a professional AND timely manner, we either seem to get straight up ignored, or we get arrogant unprofessional responses like yours.   I understand the members of WG Staff here on the forum have to filter everything you send from us upstairs to the big bosses so as not to offend their delicate sensibilities, but most of the playerbase around here (try to) enjoy this game to some degree or other and want it to succeed and be a great and fun game to play for EVERYONE at every level, and when we see an apparently visible and ongoing lack of progress in fixing the games larger more serious long term problems we rightly get concerned about it.   Because let's be totally fair here, the better part of almost TWO YEARS IS a very very long time to let the ongoing matchmaking issue drag on for, given everything else that has happened within the game in that time.  


Steve8066, on 20 March 2019 - 11:25 PM, said:   they wont admit it but it gets nerfred nearly every patch.


rowehillmaster, on 21 March 2019 - 05:44 AM, said: I want to be constructive, I have noticed an increased lag on exiting battles and returning to garage, I have noticed a delay entering battles and I would agree with the opinion of it becoming like a child's toy game - tanks with blue turrets and camouflages with orange and purple ! - really ?   The most important thing for me would be the matchmaking and how big the gap between tier 7 and 9 has become + 2 tiers used to be playable but now with all the new fictitious tier 9 tanks it is pointless - please work on the balance of historic v arcade glory


Geno1isme, on 21 March 2019 - 08:58 AM, said:   You know, a rough timeline when certain announced things are planned to be implemented would help there ... but of course that would ruin the distraction effect.

Subject: "Honorable", Sugerencias
Link on message: #16746748

Subject: Rekrutierungsprogramm 2.0: Letzter Schliff
Link on message: #16746712

Wotan262, on 20 March 2019 - 11:17 PM, said: Mein Rekrut hat heute nur ca. jedes dritte Spiel, bei dem er einen Sieg und/oder mehr Schadenspunkte als eigene HP gemacht hat,  Rekrutierungspunkte erhalten, Punkte für eine Pascucci-Medaille und der Sieg inkl. Schadenspunkte wurden auch komplett unterschlagen.   Vielleicht liegts am Update, möglicherweise kommen die Punkte noch. Die Punkte kommen sehr unregelmäßig. Mal wird gutgeschrieben, mal nicht. Hat evtl. noch jemand dieses Problem?

Subject: Update 1.4.1 - Fehler und Probleme
Link on message: #16746684

CTPower, on 21 March 2019 - 01:23 PM, said: Bist du dir sicher? Wenn und ich hier über deinen Namen in deinen Wehrpass gucke, kann ich keine Frontlinie-Auszeichnung sehen. Im WoT Assistent sind sie bei mir grau, als hätte ich nie eine gehabt.

Subject: Update 1.4.1 General feedback
Link on message: #16746678

Ryztyn, on 20 March 2019 - 06:27 PM, said:   You would have a point if we hadn't been asking for these things for a few years now.

Subject: Supertest News: The M4A1 FL 10, A French Tier VI Premium Medium Tank
Link on message: #16746664

Commander_Kuwabara, on 21 March 2019 - 01:00 AM, said: RELEASE DATE PLZ?

Subject: Retours généraux concernant la mise à jour 1.4.1
Link on message: #16746648

Reichskrone, on 20 March 2019 - 08:54 AM, said:   D'autant plus inutile que je ne peux même pas utiliser les apparences d'équipage offertes avec la nouvelle version. Aucun des tankistes que je possède ne remplit les conditions. Soit je ne joue pas les chars de la bonne nation, soit je n'ai pas encore débloqué un membre féminin de la bonne nation. Bref, quel beau cadeau inutile !


arkamindy, on 20 March 2019 - 10:59 AM, said: aucun interet cette nouvelle mise a jour pour l'apparence de l'equipage surtout une licorne qui vient au milieu pourquoi ??? fary worls of tanks ??? l'ensemble de mon clan est d'accord sa devient n'importe quoi .


Yannick22000, on 20 March 2019 - 09:31 PM, said: Problème pas lié apparemment à cette dernière mise à jour, je n'ai plus droit qu'a bouncer, bouncer et encore bouncer.Encore un peu et mes tirs remettront des points de vie aux cibles.   Mais maintenant il y a ça:     Du mérite alors que comme d'habitude je n'ai rien pu fou-tre. Trouvé ce Comet, tiré dessus à bout portant et bounce puisque je n'ai plus droit qu'à ça, et je n'ai de dégâts que parce que j'ai pu l'approcher et le percuter (seul moyen désormais dont je dispose pour faire le moindre point de dégât si j'ai pas un troll gun). J'ai servi à rien au point d'être déficitaire à l'arrivée en tier 6 et j'ai quand même une "récompense". Pas au point leur truc.    


Raphifty, on 21 March 2019 - 12:16 PM, said: Je n'aime pas trop faire des comparaisons entre les jeux mais... Quand on voit le contenu des MAJ de Warthunder : nouveaux avions, chars, bateaux, hélicoptères, nouvelles maps... on se demande ce qu'ils font chez WG... Et je dis ça je ne joue pas à Warthunder (uniquement à World of Golds) .   Vous en pensez quoi ?

Subject: Update 1.4.1 - Fehler und Probleme
Link on message: #16746602

CTPower, on 21 March 2019 - 10:34 AM, said: Moin,
bei mir sind jeweils die Frontline-Auszeichnungen Meisterstürmer, Eisenschild und Oberstes Geschütz aus dem Wehrpass verschwunden.


Marodeurpanzer, on 21 March 2019 - 12:55 PM, said:   Falls noch andere mit diesem Problem zu tun haben, hier mal die Antwort vom Support auf meine Anfrage:   Da bin ich ja mal gespannt! Auf jeden Fall ist der Support fix!

Subject: Program Rekrutacyjny - Dyskusja ogólna
Link on message: #16746565

bary2305, on 21 March 2019 - 10:28 AM, said: To działa różnie i raczej niezależnie od nacji czołgu, bo dzisiaj na m2 dodaje punkty ale tylko wybiórczo i tylko za niektóre bitwy. Tak jak Falathi pisał wcześniej i taką mam nadzieje, że punkty cały czas liczy tylko po prostu jest problem z wyświetlaniem. Czekamy na "dobrą zmiane"


kowbojxd, on 21 March 2019 - 10:32 AM, said: mi nie doliczyło wczorajszych 50 punktów ponad


braindead22, on 21 March 2019 - 10:38 AM, said:   Dobrze wiedzieć, dzisiaj też spróbuję na różnych tierach pojeździć. Tylko właśnie to mnie zastanawia, że w moim przypadku żaden pojazd do III tieru nie otrzymuje w ogóle punktów z bitew.  A w przypadku IV wzwyż punkty dodaje momentalnie, bez opóźnienia i w prawidłowej ilości.  


kowbojxd, on 21 March 2019 - 10:46 AM, said: Ludzie jesteście w błędzie TIER NIE MA ZNACZENIA w przydzielaniu punktów. Właśnie jeżdże sobie 2 i 1 tierem i przydziela punkty

Subject: Supertest News: The Tier VIII–X Swedish Medium Tanks
Link on message: #16746556

Gatix, on 20 March 2019 - 12:31 PM, said:   Yep... Once again, you buffing armor? WG/WoT, if you are out of ideas how to make more tanks with different stats/game play... Stop buffing armors. Seriously it's disgusting in all ways. I guess you buffed it for heat and auto penetration due overmatching mechanic. Commander's Cupola buffed, well done, maybe make like Obj 430U got? I see a lot of new tanks don't have small guns, machine Gun, cupola or very small. You keep removing/reworking on real weak spots instead making them or adjust them.

Subject: Referral Program 2.0: The Finishing Touches
Link on message: #16746374

Subject: Wargaming.net Game Center - Feedback
Link on message: #16746289

Subject: Stammtisch #9
Link on message: #16746287

Subject: Small little competition to give WG a helping hand(Tier 8 prem tank up for gr...
Link on message: #16746264

RaxipIx, on 20 March 2019 - 07:06 PM, said: Thank you. Look, i will apologize for the bad language i used in the you know what thread,and  i know i was wrong, and i do have some remorse "targeting" you, i hope you know i have nothing personal with you, the person sitting behind the eek name, or any other admin  whatsoever. I have a problem with the system, and how me, Raxi was treated by it.   Try to look at it from my perspective, and tell me, honestly that everything was fine how they handled this. So a name gets changed(clan name) for breaking rule 3.08 and the name XXX1 is given randomly or intentionally, can't tell. Then that obviously upsets me, not the name change per se, but the argument while  THE name assigned can just as easily break  it, probably it's even more well know what XXX stands for and what connections people might make, the the initial name in itself. Then i have to come to the forums and  and write a few tickets to CS,so it gets changed,  and finally  to put salt on the wound,somebody up there though it will be a good joke to give it LQL, Laughing Quite Loudly.   I can't take that any other way then some CS person insulting me, and mocking the situation and me  in a bad taste, i might be the only person reading these forum who is delusional enough, thinking that something like that warrants, a bare minimum "We are sorry" But it is what it is. Maybe it is how i was raised, and what principles i abide when i conduct my business , but rolling over like a beat dog when i know for a fact i was treated badly without a reason, is not in my style. And then i gave WG admins reasons, plenty.   Hope you as a person, forget the WG title you hold can understand.         Not my intention. I never reported a single name and i had no idea how the system works, until 3 weeks ago. Then i checked, and it's something i can't ignore. I hope everyone entering my contest understands that's not what i wish for. And if somebody tries to circumvent the forum rules, naming and shaming etc,  i will be the first person asking a moderator to take the proper actions needed. That being said i myself want to highlight and encourage some things myself, the system can be so easily abused, it's not worthy of a company of WG's magnitude, neither a reply by a WG admin saying i, and us need to be satisfied with a flawed system. WG have plenty of staff working on improving the game, this can be debated but they work on it apparently. I see no reason why they can't work on this system as well, and improve it.     Competition will go on, because  no sanction WG can make, or arguments they come up with, will make me change my mind, a word given here where i live, means  a lot, and that is a principle i will never break(unless i see improvements to the system)  then i will stop the competition, and  still pay out the tier 8/boxes to the person with most points.   And to clear some other things out, if the winner does not want, a tier 8 from the premium shop, or what will be on offer at that moment, i can wait until the tank he/she wants will be on for sale, and i give everybody my word i will buy it.    Another question, that i want to clear, if you want 25 Christmas boxes, yes, i can wait and give out that too, if you want a chance for some Defender, or Type 59, i have no objection, but it's up to you and how lucky will you get, also i can't guarantee boxes will be up, or what tanks you can win from them.     Forgot: this is to eek, make a search with the clan name. You know  what i am talking about, change the o to 0,  roughly a full month has passed, and the first person i see has 16 ,ish k games. Start with that one, and we can see from there. My bad the first one has over 20 k battles, and still goes strong.  

Subject: Best way to deal with wheeled vehicles?
Link on message: #16746232

Subject: Looks like...
Link on message: #16746140

Subject: This game is so unbalanced....(im high tier always but its really boring agai...
Link on message: #16746066

Subject: Update 1.4.1 General feedback
Link on message: #16744579

Flint_74, on 19 March 2019 - 06:59 PM, said: Dear Wargaming, I see your upcoming update, and I find myself wondering...   * When is team damage finally going to be removed from the game? * When are you finally going to fix the Matchmaker? Still being bottom tier in 80-90% of games (playing Tier's 5-7) after all this time waiting for things to be fixed is seriously NOT FUN. * Can we please get an option in the game settings to disable the incessant so-called Combat Intelligence (a.k.a. WG Marketing Dept. ) pop-ups on the Garage screen?   - - -     I thought they only talked about the fact they were randomly going to test the revised Matchmaking on the live server at 'some point' without telling us exactly when that would be so it'd be a fair test?       Maybe because the playerbase is getting more than a little fed up waiting for WG to finally stop sitting on the fence and actually FIX the games major problems, instead of adding to them with more and more cosmetic stuff, premium tanks, and vague promises of action.

Subject: Update 1.4.1 Map Fixes
Link on message: #16744566

Subject: Update 1.4.1 Bug Reports
Link on message: #16744557

FunkyTowel, on 20 March 2019 - 05:32 PM, said: Can's go to the "Tech tree" from the "Research" menu.

Subject: Update 1.4.1 Crew Skins
Link on message: #16744494

pmakins, on 19 March 2019 - 04:14 PM, said: As much as this update doesn't bring anything game breaking, it still doesn't fixes any of the major issues WG promised to fix this year. It's nearly April and not a single balancing issue hasn't been implemented..

I don't understand why WG refuses to update certain vehicles on a weekly basis like in other games. If there is anything game-breaking it must not wait for 45 days until next patch but instead it should be fixed asap...

Maps still have some retarded hitboxes that are invisible yet you stumble upon them and still no fixes...


_Epimetheus_, on 20 March 2019 - 01:27 AM, said: The crew skins is a bad joke, I saw those faces and did not believe my eyes. We don't play supermario here, we need nice camo's and inspired figures for crews, in summary more atmospheric and normal things !  Not those ridiculous monkey level humor.
Why so much lack of fantasy ? 
The same guys who create those faces create the christmas camo's ?
Hmm ... 
Anyway I have different sense of humor than the developers.  
And now something significant relative to crew members.
Too many times I have difficulty to choose from ... About 20 crew members faces because I have to convert the face. I don't like to see the same face in every tank or 2 times at the same tank.
So I have to pay gold to convert the faces in order to have unique crew members. If I try to recruit a new different member is like play gambling because repeatable recruits ends up to dismiss the new crew member because already exists. 
So its difficult to remember all those faces and you have to open all crew members personal files to see them on screen in an attempt to compare the new one. Cause you pay gold and you don't want to make mistake ...  I am sorry if I become boring but this is not only boring but also so primitive for a game like WOT.  10 YEARS OF EXISTENCE of game and noone have noticing this so simple problem ? 
While the solution is so simple . 
When you open the personal file at the section who change the faces, the faces that already exists it should be checked somehow. So you know what you have and what not ....  That means you don't spent 15 mins or more to pretend the Sherlock Holmes trying to identifying faces . . .For the name of the Lord !!!! Jesus !!!! 
Instead of that the ''professionals'' at WG fooling us with childish humor  (10 years nobody notice that to fix it .)


Mettkrieger, on 20 March 2019 - 09:05 AM, said: The fact that WG spent ressources on this feature is completely incomprehensible to me. Could someone enlighten me why this has been implemented? 

Subject: Game still going to crap?
Link on message: #16744484

DorsVenabiIi, on 19 March 2019 - 11:16 PM, said: Have not played for a long time, does it still suck and is it heading towards a bad direction? Any positive changes whatsoever?

Subject: Update 1.4.1 Blueprints
Link on message: #16744478

Subject: WGC nie aktualizuje gry
Link on message: #16744457