Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Overlord
EU Questions & Answers
14.05.2011 14:07:58
Subject: 
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #547148
marko4231, on 13 May 2011 - 05:45 PM, said: Hi, i have 2 questions : wil it ever be posible to mount more than
3 items of eqipment on one tank :
: why can gun barrels pass thru houses and other tanks.
Its kinda not realistic.
nebsif, on 13 May 2011 - 07:09 PM, said: ^ And will E-50 be added along with E-75 and E-100? (or sooner?
)
Taturo, on 13 May 2011 - 06:30 PM, said: Will you introduce the Porsche Tiger (or Tiger I (P)) and VK4502(P)
Ausf. A with the E-Series or will they get implemented later
on?
If that's the case, how long after the E-Series, approximately?
kymrel, on 13 May 2011 - 05:53 PM, said: I would like to add one question about the Soviet tanks while I'm
at it:
3) Do you have any timeline for the changes coming to the Soviet heavy line (i.e. the KV-1/KV-2 split, moving the KV-3 to tier 7 etc)? Can you give any idea, for example what quarter or when compared to other changes, say the E-series, French tanks and US TDs (for example before the French, but after the E-series).
Orkel2, on 13 May 2011 - 09:41 PM, said: Overlord: According to your statistics, how is the KV doing? Most
players feel it's overpowered and for a good reason. So finish it
once and for all with a stats-showing.
mascotzel, on 13 May 2011 - 09:42 PM, said: no need to use search, I watch the topic daily and the question was
not answered.
the problem is you forbid to repeat the question, and Overlord won't return to it because it's like 10 pages ago.
and I will reformulate more exactly the question above, How can I get an answer for a question asked but not answered...
and a different question : any change in matchmaking system in 0.6.4 to prevent same tanks stacking?
Kaap, on 13 May 2011 - 10:51 PM, said: Overlord,
Would/could and/or is it under consideration to provide a reset option for gold? Say x amount of gold to be able to reset 1 specific tank tree once.
Regards,
Grivan, on 14 May 2011 - 12:53 AM, said: In this article of the IS3
the author says, that instant of cast steel, welded steel is used
for better protection.
How is this implemented in the gamestats for armor strenght and penetration?
1) Is x mm of welded steel == x mm of cast steel?
or
2) Is x mm welded steel better than x mm of cast steel? And in case of this:
2.1) Which kind of steel is given in the game stats for armor strenght and penetration?
2.2) How is the factor which is used for a conversion from welded to cast steel?
Thanks in advance
Zieten, on 14 May 2011 - 01:18 AM, said: how is the viewrange of vehicles calculated? i always thought that
height was quite important for that, but that does not fit with
vehicles like the T-54 or Object 704 (no russian bias intended,
just a few which came to my mind)
eviljezza, on 14 May 2011 - 08:25 AM, said: How many exp. points will be required to go straight to the E-100
from the E-75?
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & AnswersLink on message: #547148
marko4231, on 13 May 2011 - 05:45 PM, said: Hi, i have 2 questions : wil it ever be posible to mount more than
3 items of eqipment on one tank :: why can gun barrels pass thru houses and other tanks.
Its kinda not realistic.
Overlord: 1. Perhaps some time in future. Currenty not planning to change
this.
2. A lot of things are not realistic in the game. This is only one of them.
2. A lot of things are not realistic in the game. This is only one of them.
nebsif, on 13 May 2011 - 07:09 PM, said: ^ And will E-50 be added along with E-75 and E-100? (or sooner?
)Overlord: Definitely not sooner.
Taturo, on 13 May 2011 - 06:30 PM, said: Will you introduce the Porsche Tiger (or Tiger I (P)) and VK4502(P)
Ausf. A with the E-Series or will they get implemented later
on?If that's the case, how long after the E-Series, approximately?
Overlord: Most likely they all will come together.
kymrel, on 13 May 2011 - 05:53 PM, said: I would like to add one question about the Soviet tanks while I'm
at it:3) Do you have any timeline for the changes coming to the Soviet heavy line (i.e. the KV-1/KV-2 split, moving the KV-3 to tier 7 etc)? Can you give any idea, for example what quarter or when compared to other changes, say the E-series, French tanks and US TDs (for example before the French, but after the E-series).
Overlord: See in development section of the web site. It should give you
basic understanding.
Orkel2, on 13 May 2011 - 09:41 PM, said: Overlord: According to your statistics, how is the KV doing? Most
players feel it's overpowered and for a good reason. So finish it
once and for all with a stats-showing.Overlord: According to 0.6.3.x data KV was/is earning 2-3% more expereince
than Pz IV, and slightly more than T1. Pz. IV, however has far
better win ratio, 49.5% vs 47.5%. T1 is somewhere in between
here.
Waiting for new figures of 6.4.
Waiting for new figures of 6.4.
mascotzel, on 13 May 2011 - 09:42 PM, said: no need to use search, I watch the topic daily and the question was
not answered.the problem is you forbid to repeat the question, and Overlord won't return to it because it's like 10 pages ago.
and I will reformulate more exactly the question above, How can I get an answer for a question asked but not answered...
and a different question : any change in matchmaking system in 0.6.4 to prevent same tanks stacking?
Overlord: Only indirect measures - increase of match-making value for tier 9
mediums, it will have some impact.
Kaap, on 13 May 2011 - 10:51 PM, said: Overlord,Would/could and/or is it under consideration to provide a reset option for gold? Say x amount of gold to be able to reset 1 specific tank tree once.
Regards,
Overlord: No, we gave up this idea back in the days.
Grivan, on 14 May 2011 - 12:53 AM, said: In this article of the IS3
the author says, that instant of cast steel, welded steel is used
for better protection.How is this implemented in the gamestats for armor strenght and penetration?
1) Is x mm of welded steel == x mm of cast steel?
or
2) Is x mm welded steel better than x mm of cast steel? And in case of this:
2.1) Which kind of steel is given in the game stats for armor strenght and penetration?
2.2) How is the factor which is used for a conversion from welded to cast steel?
Thanks in advance
Overlord: Cannot answer from "Game Development" perspective (though I believe
all armors are not equal), but generally cast steel offers ca. 90%
protection compared to same thickness rolled homogenous plate.
Depends, of course, on quality - early M4A1 production got so
Godawful cast quality it provided much, much less, that got changed
later as the production ramped up.
Still, apart from cast vs. RHA, there was also the problem of hardness - generally hard steel protected from projectiles of similar caliber to thickness, but when hit by a large projectile it tended to shatter (recorded for example in Yugo firing tests post-war, with US 90mm shattering T-34 hull armor at places), US preferred pretty soft armor that didn't protect that well, but OTOH didn't tend to crack and produced less spalling.
Still, apart from cast vs. RHA, there was also the problem of hardness - generally hard steel protected from projectiles of similar caliber to thickness, but when hit by a large projectile it tended to shatter (recorded for example in Yugo firing tests post-war, with US 90mm shattering T-34 hull armor at places), US preferred pretty soft armor that didn't protect that well, but OTOH didn't tend to crack and produced less spalling.
Zieten, on 14 May 2011 - 01:18 AM, said: how is the viewrange of vehicles calculated? i always thought that
height was quite important for that, but that does not fit with
vehicles like the T-54 or Object 704 (no russian bias intended,
just a few which came to my mind)Overlord: On the basis of height, but in some cases it is set according to
the balance needs.
eviljezza, on 14 May 2011 - 08:25 AM, said: How many exp. points will be required to go straight to the E-100
from the E-75?Overlord: Hasn't been determined yet.
Vallter
“Vintage” View on History
14.05.2011 12:20:28
Subject: News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\“Vintage” View on History
Link on message: #546981
News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\“Vintage” View on HistoryLink on message: #546981
Vallter: Gold enrolled to winners accounts.
Vallter
KtM3: Results
14.05.2011 12:18:43
Subject: Contests & Competitions\Special Events\Kill the Mod\KtM3: Results
Link on message: #546978
Contests & Competitions\Special Events\Kill the Mod\KtM3: ResultsLink on message: #546978
Vallter: Gold enrolled to players accounts.
OldFox
Par klaniem
14.05.2011 05:43:50
Subject: International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Klanu sadaļa\Par klaniem
Link on message: #546651
woodstar, on 13 May 2011 - 04:41 PM, said: gribetos panzerber klana
bet ka tur tikt
skatos jau ka itkaa viss pilns bet tur daudzi tadi kas vispaar nau speeleejushi
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Klanu sadaļa\Par klaniemLink on message: #546651
woodstar, on 13 May 2011 - 04:41 PM, said: gribetos panzerber klanabet ka tur tikt
skatos jau ka itkaa viss pilns bet tur daudzi tadi kas vispaar nau speeleejushi
OldFox: Pamegini iestaties otraja klana: http://game.worldoft...panzer_LV_άλφα
Overlord
EU Questions & Answers
13.05.2011 22:33:28
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #546088
Raketensegler, on 13 May 2011 - 10:28 AM, said: What is the highest experience score achieved in a single match on
each server (there is no statistic for this)?
Darwyn, on 13 May 2011 - 10:29 AM, said: The "In Developement" Section on the WoT Webpage speaks about the
launch of "international Clan Wars" in May 2011. Does this mean
that there will no beta for Europe and US Servers and all servers
will fight on the same World Map?
krolbongo, on 13 May 2011 - 10:48 AM, said: okay, another question about CW: do the players are assigned to the
tokens?
i mean i wonder if its possible to attack one day, for example, Spain. conquer first territory there and next day take part in conquering, lets say- Norway?
Shireknight, on 12 May 2011 - 10:12 PM, said: Sorry Overlord I think my last question got missed in the flurry of
recent posts 
Hi Overlord,
You may remember I asked for ventilation to be added onto the Hetzer, however now that it's been announced in the patch notes for 6.4 some people are saying that this will effectively nerf the Hetzer for everyone who doesn't install it because vehicles without the ventilation option have a buffed crew already to compensate for this.
I don't see how this is possible as it would mean that without ventilation my Commander is already at 105% and my crew at 116% even though their stats say otherwise so can you please clarify this matter once and for all, will my Hetzer crew be 5% better skilled with ventilation after patch 6.4 than it is now without ventilation please?
tazmanyak, on 13 May 2011 - 01:00 PM, said: From what i understood, yes it will be possible.
A clan can have 100 members - thus 100 tokens.
And only 15 active members that can do all the fights.
KIAEddZ, on 13 May 2011 - 12:53 PM, said: Overlord.
Sorry to keep on about this subject but as you can see for a lot of people this is a big worry.
When will the Dev team announce if the changes to the gun depression on the T29 T32 and T34 be rolled back? is it likely it will be not included in the patch that rolls out to EU servers on Tuesday? Or will the nerfs deffinately be in Tuesdays patch and a fix change if its decided to will be done after the patch?
KIAEddZ, on 13 May 2011 - 02:05 PM, said: Hey Overlord, i think what he meant was, if a clan has 50 members,
can they distribute those 50 members/tokens in say 5 different
areas each one at a different scheduled match time, and use the
same 10 actual accounts to fight each battle? or will each token be
assigned to a specific member of the clan, so wherever that players
token is distributed that particular player/account muust take part
in that match?
Szalona, on 13 May 2011 - 02:17 PM, said: Let's hope it will not be like the famous "buff of 88" 
When are you planning to create version called 1.0.0?
Xalard, on 13 May 2011 - 05:30 PM, said: Are the "special" random battles, like having no artillery or
having one side with significantly more heavies/TDs, intentional?
Are there any plans to remove such matches?
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & AnswersLink on message: #546088
Raketensegler, on 13 May 2011 - 10:28 AM, said: What is the highest experience score achieved in a single match on
each server (there is no statistic for this)?Overlord: Not sure if there is such data, personally I've seen ~4.200-4.300.
Darwyn, on 13 May 2011 - 10:29 AM, said: The "In Developement" Section on the WoT Webpage speaks about the
launch of "international Clan Wars" in May 2011. Does this mean
that there will no beta for Europe and US Servers and all servers
will fight on the same World Map?Overlord: Each server will start their own independent clan wars with the
mentioned territories available. Global maps from all 3 servers are
planned to be merged in future.
krolbongo, on 13 May 2011 - 10:48 AM, said: okay, another question about CW: do the players are assigned to the
tokens?i mean i wonder if its possible to attack one day, for example, Spain. conquer first territory there and next day take part in conquering, lets say- Norway?
Overlord: Clans are assigned tokens according to the number of members they
have.
Shireknight, on 12 May 2011 - 10:12 PM, said: Sorry Overlord I think my last question got missed in the flurry of
recent posts Hi Overlord,
You may remember I asked for ventilation to be added onto the Hetzer, however now that it's been announced in the patch notes for 6.4 some people are saying that this will effectively nerf the Hetzer for everyone who doesn't install it because vehicles without the ventilation option have a buffed crew already to compensate for this.
I don't see how this is possible as it would mean that without ventilation my Commander is already at 105% and my crew at 116% even though their stats say otherwise so can you please clarify this matter once and for all, will my Hetzer crew be 5% better skilled with ventilation after patch 6.4 than it is now without ventilation please?
Overlord: Your Hetzer's crew will be 5% better skilled with ventilation after
patch 6.4 than it is now without ventilation. That's correct.
tazmanyak, on 13 May 2011 - 01:00 PM, said: From what i understood, yes it will be possible.A clan can have 100 members - thus 100 tokens.
And only 15 active members that can do all the fights.
Overlord: All 100 tokens/players can fight at the same time. 15 per province
of course.
KIAEddZ, on 13 May 2011 - 12:53 PM, said: Overlord.Sorry to keep on about this subject but as you can see for a lot of people this is a big worry.
When will the Dev team announce if the changes to the gun depression on the T29 T32 and T34 be rolled back? is it likely it will be not included in the patch that rolls out to EU servers on Tuesday? Or will the nerfs deffinately be in Tuesdays patch and a fix change if its decided to will be done after the patch?
Overlord: 6.4 version has been stabilized, thus no more changes to it.
If the rollback decision is taken, the respective hotfix will be released shortly after the update.
If the rollback decision is taken, the respective hotfix will be released shortly after the update.
KIAEddZ, on 13 May 2011 - 02:05 PM, said: Hey Overlord, i think what he meant was, if a clan has 50 members,
can they distribute those 50 members/tokens in say 5 different
areas each one at a different scheduled match time, and use the
same 10 actual accounts to fight each battle? or will each token be
assigned to a specific member of the clan, so wherever that players
token is distributed that particular player/account muust take part
in that match?Overlord: Battles are held according to prime time of a certain timezone. If
you are attacking/defending provinces that belong to the same
timezone, such situation is impossible. If not, the same X players
can play multiple times.
Szalona, on 13 May 2011 - 02:17 PM, said: Let's hope it will not be like the famous "buff of 88" When are you planning to create version called 1.0.0?
Overlord: Nobody knows, definitely not this year. Personally I'm going to put
indices without nil. E.g. 6.4 sounds and looks better.
Xalard, on 13 May 2011 - 05:30 PM, said: Are the "special" random battles, like having no artillery or
having one side with significantly more heavies/TDs, intentional?
Are there any plans to remove such matches?Overlord: All random matches are completely randon. However oddly it might
sound.
Currently not planning to reconsider this.
Currently not planning to reconsider this.
admin
Stalin the Third
13.05.2011 19:25:17
Subject: News from the Front\Developers Blog\Stalin the Third
Link on message: #545666
News from the Front\Developers Blog\Stalin the ThirdLink on message: #545666
admin: 
IS-3 (Object 703) is the Soviet heavy tank of WWII. This steel monster was put into mass production in the final period of war but combat actions were over before it was supplied to the troops. That’s why this vehicle is often being classified as one of the first tanks of post war period. This tank was the continuator of the IS-tanks genus and got the numeral designation “3”. Due to the interesting frontal armor plating arrangement “pike-nose” it got the nickname “Pike”.
The creation of the new heavy tank project codenamed “Kirovets-1” began in the late summer of 1944 and had its own prehistory. The group of research officers headed by Engineer-Colonel A. Zavialov studied the character of damages caused by shell hits on the tank fields of Kursk Battle operation. Attention was drawn to the mass destruction of tanks caused by hits in the frontal part of the hull and turret. The project of new heavy tank IS-3 was developed according to the obtained data.
The main requirement to this new tank was the increase of protection characteristics. It was also planned to change the cast construction of the frontal part to the welded one. This solution was supposed to reduce penetrability of the tank armor by the cannons of Tiger and Panther tanks using armor-piercing and sub-caliber projectiles from all distances. It was also planned to rework the construction of the turret as it was the most vulnerable part of IS-2.
The experience of IS tanks military service had shown that the design of chassis, tank power package and transmission didn’t require any modifications to be mounted on IS-3. The hull of the tank was welded from rolled armor and had no parts of cast armor. The design of the dual inclined nose resolved the issue of the driver-mechanic hatch placement (previous type of IS-tanks had no driver hatch at all). The visibility for the driver mechanic was also significally improved as well as the frontal hull armor plating. Fuel tanks were moved from the combat to the engine compartment to reduce the danger of fire. Tank armament remained the same: 122-mm cannon D-25 and coaxial 7.62-mm DT machine gun, on the roof of the turret was mounted 12.7-mm anti-aircraft DShK machine gun. Bow machine gun and rear machine gun were not mounted.
The IS-3 turret traversing mechanism was arranged in a very interesting way: the electric drive was equipped with a commander's control system. While keeping the target in sight of his vision devices, the commander could push a special button and turn the tower in a direction needed along the shortest path. When the sight line coincided with gun bore line, the tower stopped.
December 18-24, 1944, IS-3 was officially tested in the training range. The tests included run-on operations and attacking by Wespe SPG's and ISU-122's armor-piercing guns from the distance of 600-800 m. The tank did well on the way, and the shelling showed that the front upper armor plate of the hull was not penetrated by a 88-mm armor-piercing shell at 350 m (it left a dent 28-mm deep), and was not penetrated by a 122-mm armor-piercing shell at the distance of 690 m (a dent 35-mm deep). But the front of the turret was penetrated by a 88-mm armor-piercing shell at 300 m, and the side and rare of the tank - at 1000 m.
After the military tests the Object 703 was demonstrated to G. Zhukov and A. Vasilevsky. The Marshals reported on the new machine to Joseph Stalin, who passed the tank into service of Red Army, and its production was started at the Kirov Factory in Chelyabinsk.
Despite numerous rumors and speculation, IS-3 showed up late to the war. When the armed forces of Nazi Germany were signing the act of capitulation, the tanks were still at the factory. Thus, they did not take part in battle action. Moreover, they did not commit in the Far East battles, which took place in August-September, 1945. Nevertheless, September 7, 1945, the tank regiment, armed with those fighting vehicles, took part in the Red Army Parade, which was held in Berlin in commemoration of the victory over Japan, and those vehicles made a strong impression on the USSR Allies of the Anti-Hitler coalition.
IS-3 (Object 703) is the Soviet heavy tank of WWII. This steel monster was put into mass production in the final period of war but combat actions were over before it was supplied to the troops. That’s why this vehicle is often being classified as one of the first tanks of post war period. This tank was the continuator of the IS-tanks genus and got the numeral designation “3”. Due to the interesting frontal armor plating arrangement “pike-nose” it got the nickname “Pike”.
The creation of the new heavy tank project codenamed “Kirovets-1” began in the late summer of 1944 and had its own prehistory. The group of research officers headed by Engineer-Colonel A. Zavialov studied the character of damages caused by shell hits on the tank fields of Kursk Battle operation. Attention was drawn to the mass destruction of tanks caused by hits in the frontal part of the hull and turret. The project of new heavy tank IS-3 was developed according to the obtained data.
The main requirement to this new tank was the increase of protection characteristics. It was also planned to change the cast construction of the frontal part to the welded one. This solution was supposed to reduce penetrability of the tank armor by the cannons of Tiger and Panther tanks using armor-piercing and sub-caliber projectiles from all distances. It was also planned to rework the construction of the turret as it was the most vulnerable part of IS-2.
The experience of IS tanks military service had shown that the design of chassis, tank power package and transmission didn’t require any modifications to be mounted on IS-3. The hull of the tank was welded from rolled armor and had no parts of cast armor. The design of the dual inclined nose resolved the issue of the driver-mechanic hatch placement (previous type of IS-tanks had no driver hatch at all). The visibility for the driver mechanic was also significally improved as well as the frontal hull armor plating. Fuel tanks were moved from the combat to the engine compartment to reduce the danger of fire. Tank armament remained the same: 122-mm cannon D-25 and coaxial 7.62-mm DT machine gun, on the roof of the turret was mounted 12.7-mm anti-aircraft DShK machine gun. Bow machine gun and rear machine gun were not mounted.
The IS-3 turret traversing mechanism was arranged in a very interesting way: the electric drive was equipped with a commander's control system. While keeping the target in sight of his vision devices, the commander could push a special button and turn the tower in a direction needed along the shortest path. When the sight line coincided with gun bore line, the tower stopped.
December 18-24, 1944, IS-3 was officially tested in the training range. The tests included run-on operations and attacking by Wespe SPG's and ISU-122's armor-piercing guns from the distance of 600-800 m. The tank did well on the way, and the shelling showed that the front upper armor plate of the hull was not penetrated by a 88-mm armor-piercing shell at 350 m (it left a dent 28-mm deep), and was not penetrated by a 122-mm armor-piercing shell at the distance of 690 m (a dent 35-mm deep). But the front of the turret was penetrated by a 88-mm armor-piercing shell at 300 m, and the side and rare of the tank - at 1000 m.
After the military tests the Object 703 was demonstrated to G. Zhukov and A. Vasilevsky. The Marshals reported on the new machine to Joseph Stalin, who passed the tank into service of Red Army, and its production was started at the Kirov Factory in Chelyabinsk.
Despite numerous rumors and speculation, IS-3 showed up late to the war. When the armed forces of Nazi Germany were signing the act of capitulation, the tanks were still at the factory. Thus, they did not take part in battle action. Moreover, they did not commit in the Far East battles, which took place in August-September, 1945. Nevertheless, September 7, 1945, the tank regiment, armed with those fighting vehicles, took part in the Red Army Parade, which was held in Berlin in commemoration of the victory over Japan, and those vehicles made a strong impression on the USSR Allies of the Anti-Hitler coalition.
Vallter
“Don’t worry, be happy”
13.05.2011 17:06:24
Subject: Contests & Competitions\Contests\“Don’t worry, be happy”
Link on message: #545350
Contests & Competitions\Contests\“Don’t worry, be happy”Link on message: #545350
Vallter: A tip: Though we have a lot of international forums, we have few
(inter)national smileys 
So you have big chances to win in
this field of work.
But please, keep in mind forum rules and guidelines.
So you have big chances to win in
this field of work.But please, keep in mind forum rules and guidelines.
LiannaSilverwind
Why do people quit the moment they are about to die?
13.05.2011 16:32:34
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Why do people quit the moment they are about to die?
Link on message: #545227
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Why do people quit the moment they are about to die?Link on message: #545227
LiannaSilverwind: It's the shame and dishonour that forces them to explode.
Very long time ago there was bug that did NOT account the battle you've quitted into your statistics. It was fixed long ago.
Very long time ago there was bug that did NOT account the battle you've quitted into your statistics. It was fixed long ago.
Vallter
“Don’t worry, be happy”
13.05.2011 16:28:28
Subject: Contests & Competitions\Contests\“Don’t worry, be happy”
Link on message: #545215
Dr_Nooooo, on 13 May 2011 - 03:16 PM, said: So, i played around a bit, my first time i made .gif animations and
created this little thing here
Btw, what does this rule mean?
Contests & Competitions\Contests\“Don’t worry, be happy”Link on message: #545215
Dr_Nooooo, on 13 May 2011 - 03:16 PM, said: So, i played around a bit, my first time i made .gif animations and
created this little thing hereBtw, what does this rule mean?
Vallter: When you post a smiley you can add it to the message on forums in
two ways - either selecting it from the list or typing a text
command (see the message above as an example)
Vallter
Clan Parade
13.05.2011 16:19:07
Subject: Contests & Competitions\Contests\Clan Parade
Link on message: #545191
Contests & Competitions\Contests\Clan ParadeLink on message: #545191
Vallter: Please, discuss everything in this topic
Vallter
“Don’t worry, be happy”
13.05.2011 15:59:49
Subject: Contests & Competitions\Contests\“Don’t worry, be happy”
Link on message: #545131
moopower1, on 13 May 2011 - 02:55 PM, said: where i have to submit the smileys?
Contests & Competitions\Contests\“Don’t worry, be happy”Link on message: #545131
moopower1, on 13 May 2011 - 02:55 PM, said: where i have to submit the smileys?Vallter: Just post them here
The patch will be released at the beginning.... of the next week. Russian server has received it already, but we found a bug and want to fix it before updating the European server.
If you continue the 'patch flood' in the contest topic, Moderator's team will have to take appropriate sanctions against you.
The patch will be released at the beginning.... of the next week. Russian server has received it already, but we found a bug and want to fix it before updating the European server.
If you continue the 'patch flood' in the contest topic, Moderator's team will have to take appropriate sanctions against you.
Vallter
“Don’t worry, be happy”
13.05.2011 13:45:04
Subject: Contests & Competitions\Contests\“Don’t worry, be happy”
Link on message: #544720
Contests & Competitions\Contests\“Don’t worry, be happy”Link on message: #544720
Vallter: We are starting a contest of a brand new type. Everyone knows about
some special smileys in Skype, which are not listed in the official
list (bug). Now we offer you to make your own smileys for our
game.
The contest starts immediately and ends on the 5th of June 23:59 UTC.
Important requirements and notes about creating smileys for the contest:
• Every user can take part in the contest;
• Players should make smileys that suit our forums and be related to the tank theme. (you can use current smileys as an example);
• Each user can submit up to five different smiles;
• The smiley has to be animated (GIF format) and must not exceed the size of 20Kb;
• Each smiley should have a tag (Example: :contestsmile: )
• All smileys will be taken into consideration;
Each smiley that will appear suitable for our forums will be added to the official smiles list. A user will receive 500 Gold for each smiley chosen to be added to the list.
Attention! The Administration reserves the right to cancel or prolong the event without announcing their reasons. According to Chapter 3 Section D. of WN Terms of Service: if you upload any photograph, video, or audio file to or through any WN Communication Feature, you grant to WN the non-exclusive, worldwide right to use, post, publish and display such material, without royalty or compensation of any kind, expressly waive any and all rights of privacy, moral rights or rights of attribution and integrity.
Back to article
The contest starts immediately and ends on the 5th of June 23:59 UTC.
Important requirements and notes about creating smileys for the contest:
• Every user can take part in the contest;
• Players should make smileys that suit our forums and be related to the tank theme. (you can use current smileys as an example);
• Each user can submit up to five different smiles;
• The smiley has to be animated (GIF format) and must not exceed the size of 20Kb;
• Each smiley should have a tag (Example: :contestsmile: )
• All smileys will be taken into consideration;
Each smiley that will appear suitable for our forums will be added to the official smiles list. A user will receive 500 Gold for each smiley chosen to be added to the list.
Attention! The Administration reserves the right to cancel or prolong the event without announcing their reasons. According to Chapter 3 Section D. of WN Terms of Service: if you upload any photograph, video, or audio file to or through any WN Communication Feature, you grant to WN the non-exclusive, worldwide right to use, post, publish and display such material, without royalty or compensation of any kind, expressly waive any and all rights of privacy, moral rights or rights of attribution and integrity.
Back to article
Overlord
0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forums
13.05.2011 12:47:54
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forums
Link on message: #544548
DenySpark, on 13 May 2011 - 11:01 AM, said: Overlord please answer to this question: Clan Wars will be
introduced with patch 0.6.4?
That's what i understand from that:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forumsLink on message: #544548
DenySpark, on 13 May 2011 - 11:01 AM, said: Overlord please answer to this question: Clan Wars will be
introduced with patch 0.6.4?That's what i understand from that:
Overlord: After the release of 6.4 update, there can be 1-2 weeks gap.
Overlord
0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forums
13.05.2011 11:45:32
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forums
Link on message: #544392
Gatt, on 13 May 2011 - 10:19 AM, said: Releasing patches (especially big ones) close to week-ends can be
much more problematic. Is it?
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forumsLink on message: #544392
Gatt, on 13 May 2011 - 10:19 AM, said: Releasing patches (especially big ones) close to week-ends can be
much more problematic. Is it?Overlord: Yes it is, however we have released it to Russian server already.
The deployment should go quicker and smoother here.
Overlord
EU Questions & Answers
13.05.2011 11:23:29
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #544332
Orkel2, on 12 May 2011 - 04:34 PM, said: Aw, so it can't mount the 76mm M7 L/53 with its delicious
penetration?
http://www.tarrif.ne...s&vehiclesX=174
Was the gun removed because it went from tier 6 to tier 5?
Will the AT version of the M1A2 have more penetration than the M1A2 used on the Sherman E8 at the moment?
shugendo, on 12 May 2011 - 10:25 AM, said: hi. tank on this picture says to be easy 8, but its hull more looks
like M4 in our game, except that tracks are more wider and cool, so
question: if either M4 or easy 8 looks in reality so cool why don't
we have it as it is on the picture? maybe it is planned to be
reskined? please give us this tank.
theta0123, on 12 May 2011 - 06:02 PM, said: How is the M103 gonna be made competetive compared to the IS4 and
VK4502?
It has much less armor then both of these. And we dont want another underpowerd US Tank.
Perhaps much better speed and mobility?
surfing86, on 12 May 2011 - 06:16 PM, said: There is a way to disable the HUD in the game?
Keulz, on 12 May 2011 - 08:14 PM, said: Stop complainning about the T32 being nerfed, it is OP. I have more
than 1000 XP/battle with it. So, i agree that it has to be nerfed,
but not by changing the gun depression angle that change it's
gameplay very much.
1 - Anyway, I was wondering if you ever considered, in Clan Wars, making some territories tier restricted, ie a territory where you can't use tier VI+ tanks ?
2 - I said that you were considering letting us some choice to choose the maps we don't want, but i think that the danger would be somme people playing only on 2~3 maps, so don't you think that a system that would allow one to select only 2 maps he doesn't want to let him avoid them or having less chances of playing on it ?
3 - Are you planning on improving the IA ? Because some times, the IA of my teammates really is messed up...
Chaos123, on 12 May 2011 - 09:43 PM, said: No it must be a mistake
front turret must be the t9 one
Devs wouldnt spit us on the face again
Chaos123, on 12 May 2011 - 11:05 PM, said: Remember:
M3 lee was the worst of all
#1 Will this game be available on steam for free or not?
Because it would really help spread the word
#2 Are you considering giving the 175mm PaK to the StuG E-100?
mtemtko, on 12 May 2011 - 10:11 PM, said: I heard that shots to tracks will do no damage ( to overall hp, not
track hp), will that mean that T29,T32(T34,T30) will be almost
immune to side shots? ( Was this asked yet?)
shugendo, on 12 May 2011 - 11:18 PM, said: free or not? this game can stop to be free?
RoyalBengalTiger, on 13 May 2011 - 12:45 AM, said: Is the difference between upper and lower hull side armor
thickness/slope modeled yet, or does the whole side have the same
armor?
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & AnswersLink on message: #544332
Orkel2, on 12 May 2011 - 04:34 PM, said: Aw, so it can't mount the 76mm M7 L/53 with its delicious
penetration?http://www.tarrif.ne...s&vehiclesX=174
Was the gun removed because it went from tier 6 to tier 5?
Will the AT version of the M1A2 have more penetration than the M1A2 used on the Sherman E8 at the moment?
Overlord: Module setups haven't been finalized yet. More detailed information
will be given when US TDs are released to supertest server.
shugendo, on 12 May 2011 - 10:25 AM, said: hi. tank on this picture says to be easy 8, but its hull more looks
like M4 in our game, except that tracks are more wider and cool, so
question: if either M4 or easy 8 looks in reality so cool why don't
we have it as it is on the picture? maybe it is planned to be
reskined? please give us this tank.Overlord: This is M4A1E8, the cast hull variant. You have M4A1 already in
game, even M4A1 and M4A1(76) hybrid at Tier V.
Easy 8 in game is M4A3E8, with welded hull and new pattern glacis (64mm @ 47° contrary to old pattern's 51mm @ 56°), IOW this:
Hope this satisfies your curiosity
Easy 8 in game is M4A3E8, with welded hull and new pattern glacis (64mm @ 47° contrary to old pattern's 51mm @ 56°), IOW this:
Hope this satisfies your curiosity
theta0123, on 12 May 2011 - 06:02 PM, said: How is the M103 gonna be made competetive compared to the IS4 and
VK4502?It has much less armor then both of these. And we dont want another underpowerd US Tank.
Perhaps much better speed and mobility?
Overlord: Will see, difficult to say at present. Under any circumstances it
won't be worse than T34.
surfing86, on 12 May 2011 - 06:16 PM, said: There is a way to disable the HUD in the game?Overlord: No. Not through options.
Keulz, on 12 May 2011 - 08:14 PM, said: Stop complainning about the T32 being nerfed, it is OP. I have more
than 1000 XP/battle with it. So, i agree that it has to be nerfed,
but not by changing the gun depression angle that change it's
gameplay very much.1 - Anyway, I was wondering if you ever considered, in Clan Wars, making some territories tier restricted, ie a territory where you can't use tier VI+ tanks ?
2 - I said that you were considering letting us some choice to choose the maps we don't want, but i think that the danger would be somme people playing only on 2~3 maps, so don't you think that a system that would allow one to select only 2 maps he doesn't want to let him avoid them or having less chances of playing on it ?
3 - Are you planning on improving the IA ? Because some times, the IA of my teammates really is messed up...
Overlord: 1. Yes, we were thinking of it, however decided not to change the
current model for now.
2. The issue is rather delicate, we are not ready with a satisfactory solution yet.
3. Reading and meditating helps to increase IQ .. sorry. Yup, we are going to imrove it.
2. The issue is rather delicate, we are not ready with a satisfactory solution yet.
3. Reading and meditating helps to increase IQ .. sorry. Yup, we are going to imrove it.
Chaos123, on 12 May 2011 - 09:43 PM, said: No it must be a mistakefront turret must be the t9 one
Devs wouldnt spit us on the face again
Overlord: Front turret layout is tier 8.
Chaos123, on 12 May 2011 - 11:05 PM, said: Remember:M3 lee was the worst of all
#1 Will this game be available on steam for free or not?
Because it would really help spread the word
#2 Are you considering giving the 175mm PaK to the StuG E-100?
Overlord: 1. I tend to say Yes, but it is not confirmed yet.
2. Yes, we are considering this possiblility.
2. Yes, we are considering this possiblility.
mtemtko, on 12 May 2011 - 10:11 PM, said: I heard that shots to tracks will do no damage ( to overall hp, not
track hp), will that mean that T29,T32(T34,T30) will be almost
immune to side shots? ( Was this asked yet?)Overlord: It depends on the trajectory. You still can damage the hull having
penetrated the tracks.
shugendo, on 12 May 2011 - 11:18 PM, said: free or not? this game can stop to be free?Overlord: Free2Play - now and forever.
RoyalBengalTiger, on 13 May 2011 - 12:45 AM, said: Is the difference between upper and lower hull side armor
thickness/slope modeled yet, or does the whole side have the same
armor?Overlord: Technically it can be modelled but in practice the majority of
vehicles have the same upper and lower hull side armor. E.g. Patton
has different values for front-side and rear-side armor.
Overlord
0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forums
13.05.2011 11:11:53
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forums
Link on message: #544295
Kazomir, on 13 May 2011 - 08:56 AM, said: Sunday maybe saturday, sadly...
Or you could bring a sunshine in this booring week by releasing it midweek.
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forumsLink on message: #544295
Kazomir, on 13 May 2011 - 08:56 AM, said: Sunday maybe saturday, sadly...Or you could bring a sunshine in this booring week by releasing it midweek.
Overlord: Midweek, Tuesday looks the most probable.
Overlord
0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forums
12.05.2011 23:08:32
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forums
Link on message: #543601
Arch1980, on 12 May 2011 - 06:55 PM, said: a know you keep getting asked this.but when will we get the patch
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forumsLink on message: #543601
Arch1980, on 12 May 2011 - 06:55 PM, said: a know you keep getting asked this.but when will we get the patch
Overlord: Next week.
Overlord
RIP T29 & T32?
12.05.2011 23:06:11
Subject: In-Game Vehicles\American Vehicles\Heavy Tanks\RIP T29 & T32?
Link on message: #543597
_LEO_, on 12 May 2011 - 12:26 PM, said: You are either joking, or have very little experience with US
tanks. That nerf is HUGE.
In-Game Vehicles\American Vehicles\Heavy Tanks\RIP T29 & T32?Link on message: #543597
_LEO_, on 12 May 2011 - 12:26 PM, said: You are either joking, or have very little experience with US
tanks. That nerf is HUGE.Overlord: Very likely it will be rolled back again.
LiannaSilverwind
Is the game playing with loaded dice?
12.05.2011 22:36:02
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Is the game playing with loaded dice?
Link on message: #543530
Kantenball, on 10 May 2011 - 10:07 PM, said: I throw just one Point in here.
Why are there a lot Players with 63%+ Winrate? But never seen somebody with under 40% winrate. Even botuser were never found with under 40 % from me.
So when its not controlled over mechanics. Why are there no counterparts? Really bad Players with for example just 35 % winrate?
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Is the game playing with loaded dice?Link on message: #543530
Kantenball, on 10 May 2011 - 10:07 PM, said: I throw just one Point in here.
Why are there a lot Players with 63%+ Winrate? But never seen somebody with under 40% winrate. Even botuser were never found with under 40 % from me.
So when its not controlled over mechanics. Why are there no counterparts? Really bad Players with for example just 35 % winrate?
LiannaSilverwind: Bots usually have 30-35% winrate. Average player has 48-2-48 rate,
said Overlord.
LiannaSilverwind
Buffs for German Tanks which are not mentioned in Patchnotes 0.6.4.0
12.05.2011 20:58:30
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Buffs for German Tanks which are not mentioned in Patchnotes 0.6.4.0
Link on message: #543331
Kalinin, on 12 May 2011 - 07:50 PM, said: Yeah, it also implies that anyone who disagrees with them on the
balance is stupid.
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Buffs for German Tanks which are not mentioned in Patchnotes 0.6.4.0Link on message: #543331
Kalinin, on 12 May 2011 - 07:50 PM, said: Yeah, it also implies that anyone who disagrees with them on the
balance is stupid.LiannaSilverwind: I see great difference between
1) Person who disagrees with developers.
2) Whiner.
1) Person who disagrees with developers.
2) Whiner.
LiannaSilverwind
Buffs for German Tanks which are not mentioned in Patchnotes 0.6.4.0
12.05.2011 20:48:16
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Buffs for German Tanks which are not mentioned in Patchnotes 0.6.4.0
Link on message: #543306
Quote Q: [Follow-up to the earlier question about the Germans not getting better Alpha strike.] So in your interpretation, all the German players are whiners, and if they'd just used their brains there would be no problem?
A: Exactly. Need to use their brains. The whiners, that is.
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Buffs for German Tanks which are not mentioned in Patchnotes 0.6.4.0Link on message: #543306
Quote Q: [Follow-up to the earlier question about the Germans not getting better Alpha strike.] So in your interpretation, all the German players are whiners, and if they'd just used their brains there would be no problem?
A: Exactly. Need to use their brains. The whiners, that is.
LiannaSilverwind: Correct translation would be:
"A: Exactly. They need to use their brains. Those who whine."
ie. Whiners should use brains, not German players should use brains.
Do not get caught by intentional mistranslation.
"A: Exactly. They need to use their brains. Those who whine."
ie. Whiners should use brains, not German players should use brains.
Do not get caught by intentional mistranslation.
Vallter
Player to player trade?
12.05.2011 18:38:14
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Player to player trade?
Link on message: #542970
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Player to player trade?Link on message: #542970
Vallter: We are planning to implement the trade system. But it won't be
coming soon.
Vallter
0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forums
12.05.2011 18:33:18
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forums
Link on message: #542957
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\0.6.4: Feedback from the Russian forumsLink on message: #542957
Vallter: Well, you will receive this patch soon too and will be able to test
it yourself. Also we will add some new languages for the European
server client.
LiannaSilverwind
Now its OFFICIAL: Paradoxxon's view on patch 0.6.4.
12.05.2011 18:14:40
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Now its OFFICIAL: Paradoxxon's view on patch 0.6.4.
Link on message: #542900
direwo, on 12 May 2011 - 04:39 PM, said: We might not be able to see win% and whatnot ( largely irrelevant
IMHO ) but we can see the base vehicle stats just fine, they are
what determines what a vehicle is capable of. I also have valid
reasons to distrust certain dev comments like M26, T23 T34 and T30
are fine. If they were so fine why are they going to be
removed/demoted ? Answer me that please.
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Now its OFFICIAL: Paradoxxon's view on patch 0.6.4.Link on message: #542900
direwo, on 12 May 2011 - 04:39 PM, said: We might not be able to see win% and whatnot ( largely irrelevant
IMHO ) but we can see the base vehicle stats just fine, they are
what determines what a vehicle is capable of. I also have valid
reasons to distrust certain dev comments like M26, T23 T34 and T30
are fine. If they were so fine why are they going to be
removed/demoted ? Answer me that please.LiannaSilverwind: Can you see the following stats of any vehicle, please? 5 examples
straight from the head:
1) Horizontal aiming angle of cannon?
2) Gun depression angle both up (how is that called? ) and down for cannon? Eide:
elevation and depression
3) Vehicle acceleration based on current weight, engine and terrain?
4) What is vehicle average speed on normal, bad, good terrain?
5) HP of tracks or any other module?
I cannot speak for developers, but from what I've noticed, they always buff underperforming vehicles and always nerf overperforming ones. Can you provide exact quotes of them speaking these vehicles are fine, with dates and devs positions in WG?
1) Horizontal aiming angle of cannon?
2) Gun depression angle both up (how is that called?
) and down for cannon? Eide:
elevation and depression 3) Vehicle acceleration based on current weight, engine and terrain?
4) What is vehicle average speed on normal, bad, good terrain?
5) HP of tracks or any other module?
I cannot speak for developers, but from what I've noticed, they always buff underperforming vehicles and always nerf overperforming ones. Can you provide exact quotes of them speaking these vehicles are fine, with dates and devs positions in WG?
Overlord
EU Questions & Answers
12.05.2011 17:36:19
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #542781
mascotzel, on 12 May 2011 - 11:18 AM, said: Why are stats shown in numbers that represent max level + max
bonusses added afterwards?
It does not seem logical...it's false advertising.
You should show the numbers dor 100% crew and show the increases other things bring aftwerwards.
It's like saying ...buy our new Mercedes X which is capable of 300 mph , u buy it and then find out a small footnote like " with optional 2000HP twin rocket engine, for 2mil $ each"
Nikola_Bathory, on 12 May 2011 - 01:18 PM, said: No server-side skins in the new patch?
Souroy, on 12 May 2011 - 12:59 PM, said: The AMX-50 120mm of the French tree correspond to which variant
?
As there were several different models ("normal", uparmored, lowered ...) I'm curious to see which model was used (if possible with plan, photo ...).
Thanks.
Nisu, on 12 May 2011 - 01:36 PM, said: http://shop.worldoft...rder/index.html
when it will avaiable for EU ?
Panthera, on 12 May 2011 - 12:33 PM, said: What sort of role will the American Christie tanks have on the
battlefield?
AFAIK the Bt-2 and Bt-7 also have Christie suspension and they are known as cavalry or fast tanks, but in the game this doesn't really show that much in my opinion. Are you planning to give them a distinct role on the battlefield as the line stops after tier 4?
KIAEddZ, on 12 May 2011 - 12:38 PM, said: Overlord can you explain the thinking behind the 40% nerf to the
Objekt 704 Horizontal Gun Traverse? It seems like a wild swing of
the nerf bat, why such a deep cut into one of its unique
characteristics?
Also whilst we are on the subject of the Objekt 704, the speed nerf will mean avg cruising speed drops into the high 20s, this puts it in line with heavies of the same tier, but again removes a very distinct charcteristic of the tank, with the reality that its frontal armour is actually pretty weak vs tier 7+ fire, why such a nerf in its combat field maneouvrability?
Szalona, on 12 May 2011 - 02:25 PM, said: When EU will be able to transfer accounts to test servers instead
usinf RU accounts?
BTW. what will happand, if Lowe will perform much better then M6A2E1 due to better penetration? Will you adjust this 2 tanks to be more in pair?
Lobo, on 12 May 2011 - 02:14 PM, said: Will the M10 USA TD get the UK 17 Pounder gun as an option ?
Orkel2, on 12 May 2011 - 03:37 PM, said: What is the best gun the M10 can mount?
Keulz, on 12 May 2011 - 03:48 PM, said: 1 - Why adding A dynamic view range port ?
2 - Why aren't there checkpoint (for being spoted) at the four corners of the tank, instead of on the axes (and now on middle right/left) ?
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & AnswersLink on message: #542781
mascotzel, on 12 May 2011 - 11:18 AM, said: Why are stats shown in numbers that represent max level + max
bonusses added afterwards?It does not seem logical...it's false advertising.
You should show the numbers dor 100% crew and show the increases other things bring aftwerwards.
It's like saying ...buy our new Mercedes X which is capable of 300 mph , u buy it and then find out a small footnote like " with optional 2000HP twin rocket engine, for 2mil $ each"
Overlord: This is a known issue. Planning to rework the display of stats.
Nikola_Bathory, on 12 May 2011 - 01:18 PM, said: No server-side skins in the new patch? Overlord: No, skins will come later, likely after most of the revision of the
tech trees.
Souroy, on 12 May 2011 - 12:59 PM, said: The AMX-50 120mm of the French tree correspond to which variant
?As there were several different models ("normal", uparmored, lowered ...) I'm curious to see which model was used (if possible with plan, photo ...).
Thanks.
Overlord: This one - http://www.chars-fra...photo%20amx.jpg
Nisu, on 12 May 2011 - 01:36 PM, said: http://shop.worldoft...rder/index.htmlwhen it will avaiable for EU ?
Overlord: These are just pre-orders, this stuff will be available for
purchase on regular basis when they are finished. As far as I know
this company can deliver the goods to any EU country.
Panthera, on 12 May 2011 - 12:33 PM, said: What sort of role will the American Christie tanks have on the
battlefield?AFAIK the Bt-2 and Bt-7 also have Christie suspension and they are known as cavalry or fast tanks, but in the game this doesn't really show that much in my opinion. Are you planning to give them a distinct role on the battlefield as the line stops after tier 4?
Overlord: Will see, it's too early to discuss them.
KIAEddZ, on 12 May 2011 - 12:38 PM, said: Overlord can you explain the thinking behind the 40% nerf to the
Objekt 704 Horizontal Gun Traverse? It seems like a wild swing of
the nerf bat, why such a deep cut into one of its unique
characteristics?Also whilst we are on the subject of the Objekt 704, the speed nerf will mean avg cruising speed drops into the high 20s, this puts it in line with heavies of the same tier, but again removes a very distinct charcteristic of the tank, with the reality that its frontal armour is actually pretty weak vs tier 7+ fire, why such a nerf in its combat field maneouvrability?
Overlord: This was the necessary rebalancing, the aim was neither buff nor
nerf Object 704, but adjust its playstyle. Horizontal traverse is
rather important for sure, however it received HP increase and
dispersion decrease as well.
As for speed values, they are not that important.
As for speed values, they are not that important.
Szalona, on 12 May 2011 - 02:25 PM, said: When EU will be able to transfer accounts to test servers instead
usinf RU accounts?BTW. what will happand, if Lowe will perform much better then M6A2E1 due to better penetration? Will you adjust this 2 tanks to be more in pair?
Overlord: 1. We MIGHT do this prior to 0.6.5 public testing.
2. Will see, don't have any stat data on 0.6.4 at this time.
2. Will see, don't have any stat data on 0.6.4 at this time.
Lobo, on 12 May 2011 - 02:14 PM, said: Will the M10 USA TD get the UK 17 Pounder gun as an option ?Overlord: No. If we mount this one on M10, we will get a British TD.
Orkel2, on 12 May 2011 - 03:37 PM, said: What is the best gun the M10 can mount?Overlord: 76mm AT Gun M1A2 or 105mm AT SPH M4 L23. Don't know which is
better.
Keulz, on 12 May 2011 - 03:48 PM, said: 1 - Why adding A dynamic view range port ?2 - Why aren't there checkpoint (for being spoted) at the four corners of the tank, instead of on the axes (and now on middle right/left) ?
Overlord: 1. To enable more credible visiblility checks. For some reason rays
going from one of ports can be blocked by a minor object. Having
two ports decreases this probability.
2. This layout ensures the most precise checks.
2. This layout ensures the most precise checks.
LiannaSilverwind
Now its OFFICIAL: Paradoxxon's view on patch 0.6.4.
12.05.2011 17:25:25
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Now its OFFICIAL: Paradoxxon's view on patch 0.6.4.
Link on message: #542749
loonsbro, on 12 May 2011 - 04:20 PM, said: I would have to ask do the devs play the game? And if they do can
they not see that quite frankly the Russian tanks own the battle
field from top to bottom no Russian tank needs a buff. That really
is the bottom line of the situation.
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Now its OFFICIAL: Paradoxxon's view on patch 0.6.4.Link on message: #542749
loonsbro, on 12 May 2011 - 04:20 PM, said: I would have to ask do the devs play the game? And if they do can
they not see that quite frankly the Russian tanks own the battle
field from top to bottom no Russian tank needs a buff. That really
is the bottom line of the situation.LiannaSilverwind: Official non-test server profile of Zlobny, Main Balance Guru:
http://challenge.wor...nts/408-Zlobny/
LiannaSilverwind
Now its OFFICIAL: Paradoxxon's view on patch 0.6.4.
12.05.2011 17:23:07
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Now its OFFICIAL: Paradoxxon's view on patch 0.6.4.
Link on message: #542744
Vaderan, on 12 May 2011 - 04:06 PM, said: The european playerbase keeps complaining about OP russian tanks,
weak german guns and the ridiculous game-dominating artillerie.
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Now its OFFICIAL: Paradoxxon's view on patch 0.6.4.Link on message: #542744
Vaderan, on 12 May 2011 - 04:06 PM, said: The european playerbase keeps complaining about OP russian tanks,
weak german guns and the ridiculous game-dominating artillerie.LiannaSilverwind: Although I may play devil's advocate here, but I have noticed in
many MMOs I have played that many people think they know what
community does want and are quite vocal about it. The fact is most
players do not read forums. Therefore anyone who claims that he/she
knows what community (that part of community he/she likes or
supports the ideas of), is not strictly objective. And no, not even
100 players, are real representation of the community that counts
for more than hundred of thousand players on EU server only.
At the same time, we, players, do not have any statistics about prowess of certain tanks, most of us do not even play on Supertest servers. Developers on the other side of the fence do have complete statistics and we already see tanks being too good are being nerfed, while tanks being too bad are being boosted.
And yes, we may think that developers are wrong, but we lack information that they have, often continuing in tradition "Rock is fine. Nerf scissors. Signed: Paper."
In any case I recommend this thread as well:
http://forum.worldof...atchnotes-0640/
At the same time, we, players, do not have any statistics about prowess of certain tanks, most of us do not even play on Supertest servers. Developers on the other side of the fence do have complete statistics and we already see tanks being too good are being nerfed, while tanks being too bad are being boosted.
And yes, we may think that developers are wrong, but we lack information that they have, often continuing in tradition "Rock is fine. Nerf scissors. Signed: Paper."
In any case I recommend this thread as well:
http://forum.worldof...atchnotes-0640/
OldFox
Kuras nacionalitātes artilēriju izvēlēties?
12.05.2011 16:28:56
Subject: International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Tehnika\Tehnikas salīdzinājums\Kuras nacionalitātes artilēriju izvēlēties?
Link on message: #542576
maxd2, on 10 May 2011 - 03:36 PM, said: Noderīga informācija
Iespējams tā arī ir. Mans viedoklis par M40/M43 veidojās open beta beigās, kad ar to paspēlēju vairāk. Radās iespaids, ka tankiem tiek nodarīts mazāks dmg, ja lādiņš nokrīt blakām. Varbūt tajās reizēs tie bija tanki ar nesabojātu un spēcīgāku bruņu. Ne vienmēr piefiksēju tankus, pa kuriem šauju.
Vēl ir novērota tāda lieta, ka, veicot lielu pagriezienu ar Su-14 vai Object 212, tēmeklis jau uzreiz ir ļoti savilcies. Ja pēc tam pagriežas vēl nedaudz, tad tas izkliedējas daudz vairāk. Tādējādi reizēm šīm artilērijām tēmēšanas laiks sanāk mazāks, ja nevajag veikt sīkākas korekcijas pēc pietēmēšanas ar ctrl + labais peles taustiņš. Šitā lieta arī rada iespaidu, ka ar krievu 6. 7. tier artijām ir vieglāk tēmēt.
Johaidī, tas tiešām ir daudz
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Tehnika\Tehnikas salīdzinājums\Kuras nacionalitātes artilēriju izvēlēties?Link on message: #542576
maxd2, on 10 May 2011 - 03:36 PM, said: Noderīga informācija Iespējams tā arī ir. Mans viedoklis par M40/M43 veidojās open beta beigās, kad ar to paspēlēju vairāk. Radās iespaids, ka tankiem tiek nodarīts mazāks dmg, ja lādiņš nokrīt blakām. Varbūt tajās reizēs tie bija tanki ar nesabojātu un spēcīgāku bruņu. Ne vienmēr piefiksēju tankus, pa kuriem šauju.
Vēl ir novērota tāda lieta, ka, veicot lielu pagriezienu ar Su-14 vai Object 212, tēmeklis jau uzreiz ir ļoti savilcies. Ja pēc tam pagriežas vēl nedaudz, tad tas izkliedējas daudz vairāk. Tādējādi reizēm šīm artilērijām tēmēšanas laiks sanāk mazāks, ja nevajag veikt sīkākas korekcijas pēc pietēmēšanas ar ctrl + labais peles taustiņš. Šitā lieta arī rada iespaidu, ka ar krievu 6. 7. tier artijām ir vieglāk tēmēt.
Johaidī, tas tiešām ir daudz
OldFox: Krievu servri jau stav versija 0.6.4. Tehniskie raditaji atkal ir
mainiti visiem, ieklaujot 7 lvl. Tam ir samazinats parlaidesanas
atrums (tas ir slikti), bet uzlabota precizitate (tas ir labi). Un
ASV un vacu 7 lvl ir iedoti BB ladini - vot tas ir baigi labi!
OldFox
Kuras nacionalitātes artilēriju izvēlēties?
12.05.2011 16:25:37
Subject: International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Tehnika\Tehnikas salīdzinājums\Kuras nacionalitātes artilēriju izvēlēties?
Link on message: #542564
LVpollo3, on 10 May 2011 - 01:45 PM, said: ka ir ar vaciesu pai 8lvl ?
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Tehnika\Tehnikas salīdzinājums\Kuras nacionalitātes artilēriju izvēlēties?Link on message: #542564
LVpollo3, on 10 May 2011 - 01:45 PM, said: ka ir ar vaciesu pai 8lvl ?OldFox: Visbiezakas prieksejas brunas no PAI, bet lielgabals tads pats ka 7
lvl. Druscin atraka parlaidesana, mazaki gabariti par Gw-Tigeri,
bus mazak pamanams. Bet nav ipasi interesants, bez "rozinem".
Cheeka
Clans’ Last Chance to Be Presented
12.05.2011 14:02:51
Subject: News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\Clans’ Last Chance to Be Presented
Link on message: #542160
News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\Clans’ Last Chance to Be PresentedLink on message: #542160
Cheeka: Clans’ Last Chance to Be Presented
Back to article
Back to article
Overlord
EU Questions & Answers
12.05.2011 12:56:58
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #541957
B051LjKo, on 11 May 2011 - 03:36 PM, said: Please, be very, very careful when considering this issue. It
messes the basic concept of hi and low profile vehicles...
Lower profile offers a lot of benefits. Smaller target, better slopes, better armor for less weight...
It's only drawbacks are cramped conditions for the (witch players can not experience for obvious reasons) and limited negative gun elevation due to limited space available for gun recoil inside the turret. This "feature" followed every Soviet/Russian tanks manufactured in the last 70 years.. .From IS3 do T-90. (I believe max. gun depression for T72/T64 is not bigger then -6 degrees)
You will find this in every history book that describes armored fighting vehicles. I know this game is more of an arcade then simulation, and understand the need to balance all vehicles in the same tier (and agree with it 100 %) put please, please, "play" with hit points, ROF, gun damage and other "virtual" characteristics... Just try to leave historical data untouched, especially if they are in conflict with common sense and reason like the gun depression nerf we've just experienced. A tank that is 3,2 meter tall MUST have a bigger gun depression then a tank that is 2,5 or 2,7 meter tall...
Just my 2 cents
eviljezza, on 11 May 2011 - 04:10 PM, said: will the finalists of URAL steel that go to Moscow be taken on a
trip to Kubinka museum?
CerVus, on 11 May 2011 - 04:20 PM, said: How could you nerf ROF of almost all german guns (which are weakest
at the moment) and give us nothing (better aiming, dmg,
PENETRATION!!!) in return?
ZorinWarfield, on 11 May 2011 - 04:32 PM, said: Do you really want to introduce this feature? I thought we all
agreed upon it being a bad move.
Orkel2, on 12 May 2011 - 12:04 AM, said: How easy is it for a foreigner to get a tour in Kubinka? Can any
average Joe (or from any other countries) ask for an appointment
and fly to Russia and check out the Maus and stuff? I think this
classifies as an acceptable question seeing as you devs are
planning that for the finalists.
Paaranoja, on 12 May 2011 - 09:04 AM, said: 1. hit box of crew members, does it resemble a person (head, torso,
legs) or is it just a rectangular shape in position of the
crew??
2. will there ever be an option to disable auto adjust for distance when aiming?? aiming at a stationary target is just fine, but when trying to lead the target that is in level with us, the aim adjusts for something far away resulting in overshooting the intended target... this is most obvious when targeting tanks on the hill, the aim adjusts for shooting the sky ergo the shell travels too high missing the target. ?
3. there are modules for engine durability, fuel tanks durability, ammo rack durability, will we ever see such modules for tracks, gun, turret?
4. are the following tanks real, fiction or combination of those two (cant find real info on them): Jagdpanther 2, T110, ST-1?
5. Care to share any general info on the upcoming tier 5 lights? my prediction (comparing all nations): Rus: nimble, really fast, weaker gun. GER: Nice armor, good gun, best view range, less top speed and acceleration USA: great acc and cornering, great(best) gun, lesser top speed, the worst armor? Am i close?
6. In my experience damaged guns preformance vary from nation to nation, is that true? damaged german guns lose less acc than russian or american damaged guns?
7. Why are you sticking to huge patch in less frequent intervals politic and not to lesser patches but more frequent intervals? in my opinion it would be easier on the balancing crew and community likes to see progress.
8. When will the humels second gun aim time bug be fixed?
9. The Ural Steel is long over, when, if ever, will we some stats (tanks used, match duration), and scoreboards for ad least 1/8 and up
10. Few questions bout the finalized 6.4 patch
a) reducing the gun depression of american tanks? why? dont you think that that change is making american tanks less exceptional at their strength, and making them more average thus decreasing the variety of the gameplay? the most bizarre is the T34 nerf as it uses the same turret as the T29 and T30 (or was the T34's depression better all the time)
b ) S-51 another rof nerf is fine (dont like it, but i can see what you are aiming for) as it's suposed to be the much more mobile platform for the 155/203 than SU-14 but why isn't there a bonus in acc to compensate for the painful ROF (no one wants to miss after that long reload)
c)If the patch is FINALIZED, why is there no date for the release, it could be tomorrow amrite? Or are you waiting for the Drill camp to end so you can release the patch?
you don't have to answer all of my questions
Kaap, on 12 May 2011 - 07:54 AM, said: I dont mean clan wars tools. Just general clan management tools.
Right now you have a clanleader and that is all. We need a backend
tool to promote/demote people. Build ranks inside the clan. Assign
additional officers. Message of the day, create a seperate officers
channel etc etc.
They are badly needed because at the moment just beside 1 guy being leader having to deal with invites and a common chat channel, clans are...well nothing.
Any info pretty please
_LEO_, on 12 May 2011 - 09:00 AM, said: T1 heavy: gun depression decreased by 3 degrees.
M6: gun depression decreased by 4 degrees.
Т32: Gun depression decreased by 4 degrees.
Т34: Gun depression decreased by 4 degrees.
Are this decision based on testing, or were they some last minute changes? (I cant find any info on them in 0.6.4 preliminary patch notes or in 0.6.4 test patches notes)
I find this changes extremly harsh, especially in T34 case (considering his weak hull armor, compared to other tier IX heavies).
This change removes more than half of the hull down positions, because 4 degrees difference in gun depression is huge, as you can see in the following image:
Szalona, on 12 May 2011 - 09:16 AM, said: Is M6A2E1 damage also nerfed? Because then it is big nerf compering
to Lowe statistics, which is also T8 premium tank:
M6A2E1: 105mm Gun T5E1E, DAM 360/360/450, PEN 198/245/53, ROF 4,8 - current
M6A2E1: 105mm Gun T5E1E, DAM 320/320/450, PEN 198/245/53, ROF 4,8 - nerfed
Lowe: 10,5cm KwK46/L70, DAM 320/320/420, PEN 232/294/60, ROF: 6,0
Also Lowe has better view range and accurancy as far as I know!
Lowe has better ROF (2 sec. difference!) and MUCH MUCH MUCH better PEN (and PEN is most important!) but same DMG.
It is not fair to nerf this tank, it is now in good place with the statistics it has right now. Dmg nerf is not right, specially if other premium tank has much better other statistics including penetration!
posthumecaver, on 12 May 2011 - 11:38 AM, said: Does that mean that all the tanks that are using T5E1 will get 320
damage (T29, T32, T34) or it is just for M6A2E1?
Lowe: 10,5cm KwK46/L70, DAM 320/320/420, PEN 232/294/60, ROF: 6,0
And this puzzles me, u always gave the German guns higher penetration but for compensation US tanks got the higher damage (which is relevant while this means HE damage goes also down, US tanks against some Tier 9, 10 vehicles has no other choice then using HE)...
Wouldn't be better at least make the damage at least 340 so it would be more then German damage?
May be for T29, T32, T34 this is not so relevant but turret of M6A2E1 is not so un-penetrable as T29, T32 or T34 and with such huge profile and paper sides, it would be sitting duck...
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & AnswersLink on message: #541957
B051LjKo, on 11 May 2011 - 03:36 PM, said: Please, be very, very careful when considering this issue. It
messes the basic concept of hi and low profile vehicles...Lower profile offers a lot of benefits. Smaller target, better slopes, better armor for less weight...
It's only drawbacks are cramped conditions for the (witch players can not experience for obvious reasons) and limited negative gun elevation due to limited space available for gun recoil inside the turret. This "feature" followed every Soviet/Russian tanks manufactured in the last 70 years.. .From IS3 do T-90. (I believe max. gun depression for T72/T64 is not bigger then -6 degrees)
You will find this in every history book that describes armored fighting vehicles. I know this game is more of an arcade then simulation, and understand the need to balance all vehicles in the same tier (and agree with it 100 %) put please, please, "play" with hit points, ROF, gun damage and other "virtual" characteristics... Just try to leave historical data untouched, especially if they are in conflict with common sense and reason like the gun depression nerf we've just experienced. A tank that is 3,2 meter tall MUST have a bigger gun depression then a tank that is 2,5 or 2,7 meter tall...
Just my 2 cents
Overlord: Actually there were some issues with models as well, larger
depression angles lead to guns going through the front hull armor.
However gameplay impact is considerable, so will think it over once
again.
eviljezza, on 11 May 2011 - 04:10 PM, said: will the finalists of URAL steel that go to Moscow be taken on a
trip to Kubinka museum?Overlord: Yes, we would like to make it. Though it is going to be only a part
of the schedule.
CerVus, on 11 May 2011 - 04:20 PM, said: How could you nerf ROF of almost all german guns (which are weakest
at the moment) and give us nothing (better aiming, dmg,
PENETRATION!!!) in return?Overlord: Speaking of vehicles I've played myself post-patch:
Tiger -> much better
KT -> a bit better
JP -> significantly better
JT -> much better
Maus -> much better
Tiger -> much better
KT -> a bit better
JP -> significantly better
JT -> much better
Maus -> much better
ZorinWarfield, on 11 May 2011 - 04:32 PM, said: Do you really want to introduce this feature? I thought we all
agreed upon it being a bad move.Overlord: It is controversial, but not bad. Anyway it could be turned off by
some players, now everybody can.
Orkel2, on 12 May 2011 - 12:04 AM, said: How easy is it for a foreigner to get a tour in Kubinka? Can any
average Joe (or from any other countries) ask for an appointment
and fly to Russia and check out the Maus and stuff? I think this
classifies as an acceptable question seeing as you devs are
planning that for the finalists.Overlord: It is quite possible (the museum is not classified, but is an
active regiment), but you need someone (Russian citizen) to
accompany you there.
http://www.tankmuseum.ru/inf_r.html
http://www.tankmuseum.ru/inf1_r.html
http://www.tankmuseum.ru/inf_r.html
http://www.tankmuseum.ru/inf1_r.html
Paaranoja, on 12 May 2011 - 09:04 AM, said: 1. hit box of crew members, does it resemble a person (head, torso,
legs) or is it just a rectangular shape in position of the
crew??2. will there ever be an option to disable auto adjust for distance when aiming?? aiming at a stationary target is just fine, but when trying to lead the target that is in level with us, the aim adjusts for something far away resulting in overshooting the intended target... this is most obvious when targeting tanks on the hill, the aim adjusts for shooting the sky ergo the shell travels too high missing the target. ?
3. there are modules for engine durability, fuel tanks durability, ammo rack durability, will we ever see such modules for tracks, gun, turret?
4. are the following tanks real, fiction or combination of those two (cant find real info on them): Jagdpanther 2, T110, ST-1?
5. Care to share any general info on the upcoming tier 5 lights? my prediction (comparing all nations): Rus: nimble, really fast, weaker gun. GER: Nice armor, good gun, best view range, less top speed and acceleration USA: great acc and cornering, great(best) gun, lesser top speed, the worst armor? Am i close?
6. In my experience damaged guns preformance vary from nation to nation, is that true? damaged german guns lose less acc than russian or american damaged guns?
7. Why are you sticking to huge patch in less frequent intervals politic and not to lesser patches but more frequent intervals? in my opinion it would be easier on the balancing crew and community likes to see progress.
8. When will the humels second gun aim time bug be fixed?
9. The Ural Steel is long over, when, if ever, will we some stats (tanks used, match duration), and scoreboards for ad least 1/8 and up
10. Few questions bout the finalized 6.4 patch
a) reducing the gun depression of american tanks? why? dont you think that that change is making american tanks less exceptional at their strength, and making them more average thus decreasing the variety of the gameplay? the most bizarre is the T34 nerf as it uses the same turret as the T29 and T30 (or was the T34's depression better all the time)
b ) S-51 another rof nerf is fine (dont like it, but i can see what you are aiming for) as it's suposed to be the much more mobile platform for the 155/203 than SU-14 but why isn't there a bonus in acc to compensate for the painful ROF (no one wants to miss after that long reload)
c)If the patch is FINALIZED, why is there no date for the release, it could be tomorrow amrite? Or are you waiting for the Drill camp to end so you can release the patch?
you don't have to answer all of my questions
Overlord: 1. Something between. 3 parallelepipeds that resemble a sitting
tankman:
..|
./
|
2. Not planned now.
3. Under discussion.
6. Damaged gun accuracy depends on a gun original accuracy. Penalty in % are the same.
7. All I can say is we want to release lesser patches with more frequent intervals. We'd love to release a patch every month. Sometimes (all the time) things are not as one would like them to be.
10.
a) According to statistics and observations american tanks were overpowered.
..|
./
|
2. Not planned now.
3. Under discussion.
6. Damaged gun accuracy depends on a gun original accuracy. Penalty in % are the same.
7. All I can say is we want to release lesser patches with more frequent intervals. We'd love to release a patch every month. Sometimes (all the time) things are not as one would like them to be.
10.
a) According to statistics and observations american tanks were overpowered.
Kaap, on 12 May 2011 - 07:54 AM, said: I dont mean clan wars tools. Just general clan management tools.
Right now you have a clanleader and that is all. We need a backend
tool to promote/demote people. Build ranks inside the clan. Assign
additional officers. Message of the day, create a seperate officers
channel etc etc.They are badly needed because at the moment just beside 1 guy being leader having to deal with invites and a common chat channel, clans are...well nothing.
Any info pretty please
Overlord: Update of CWs functionality will come shortly after the v.0.6.4
patch and bring expanded clan management tools.
_LEO_, on 12 May 2011 - 09:00 AM, said: T1 heavy: gun depression decreased by 3 degrees.M6: gun depression decreased by 4 degrees.
Т32: Gun depression decreased by 4 degrees.
Т34: Gun depression decreased by 4 degrees.
Are this decision based on testing, or were they some last minute changes? (I cant find any info on them in 0.6.4 preliminary patch notes or in 0.6.4 test patches notes)
I find this changes extremly harsh, especially in T34 case (considering his weak hull armor, compared to other tier IX heavies).
This change removes more than half of the hull down positions, because 4 degrees difference in gun depression is huge, as you can see in the following image:
Overlord: Was covered earlier, there were several reasons. Thinking this over
once again now.
Szalona, on 12 May 2011 - 09:16 AM, said: Is M6A2E1 damage also nerfed? Because then it is big nerf compering
to Lowe statistics, which is also T8 premium tank:M6A2E1: 105mm Gun T5E1E, DAM 360/360/450, PEN 198/245/53, ROF 4,8 - current
M6A2E1: 105mm Gun T5E1E, DAM 320/320/450, PEN 198/245/53, ROF 4,8 - nerfed
Lowe: 10,5cm KwK46/L70, DAM 320/320/420, PEN 232/294/60, ROF: 6,0
Also Lowe has better view range and accurancy as far as I know!
Lowe has better ROF (2 sec. difference!) and MUCH MUCH MUCH better PEN (and PEN is most important!) but same DMG.
It is not fair to nerf this tank, it is now in good place with the statistics it has right now. Dmg nerf is not right, specially if other premium tank has much better other statistics including penetration!
Overlord: M6A2E1 post patch:
DAM 320/320/420, PEN 198/245/53, ROF - 5,77
DAM 320/320/420, PEN 198/245/53, ROF - 5,77
posthumecaver, on 12 May 2011 - 11:38 AM, said: Does that mean that all the tanks that are using T5E1 will get 320
damage (T29, T32, T34) or it is just for M6A2E1?Lowe: 10,5cm KwK46/L70, DAM 320/320/420, PEN 232/294/60, ROF: 6,0
And this puzzles me, u always gave the German guns higher penetration but for compensation US tanks got the higher damage (which is relevant while this means HE damage goes also down, US tanks against some Tier 9, 10 vehicles has no other choice then using HE)...
Wouldn't be better at least make the damage at least 340 so it would be more then German damage?
May be for T29, T32, T34 this is not so relevant but turret of M6A2E1 is not so un-penetrable as T29, T32 or T34 and with such huge profile and paper sides, it would be sitting duck...
Overlord: See http://forum.worldof...__1#entry538684
LiannaSilverwind
Buffs for German Tanks which are not mentioned in Patchnotes 0.6.4.0
12.05.2011 09:24:53
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Buffs for German Tanks which are not mentioned in Patchnotes 0.6.4.0
Link on message: #541477
Nikola_Bathory, on 12 May 2011 - 08:10 AM, said: btw Why is this a sticky?
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Buffs for German Tanks which are not mentioned in Patchnotes 0.6.4.0Link on message: #541477
Nikola_Bathory, on 12 May 2011 - 08:10 AM, said: btw Why is this a sticky?LiannaSilverwind: In order to collect all information considering 0.6.4. changes that
were not described in detail.
Forum rules are still to be followed in the thread.
Best regards
Lia
Forum rules are still to be followed in the thread.
Best regards
Lia
OldFox
Tulkotaju konkurss
12.05.2011 09:16:10
Subject: International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Turnīri un konkursi\Viktorīnas un konkursi\Tulkotaju konkurss
Link on message: #541466
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Turnīri un konkursi\Viktorīnas un konkursi\Tulkotaju konkurssLink on message: #541466
OldFox: Visas iztulkotas materialus jus varat atras sadala Taktika,
apakssadala "Pamacibas".
OldFox
Ko nedariit kaujaa.
12.05.2011 09:14:53
Subject: International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Spēles apspriešana\Pamācības\Ko nedariit kaujaa.
Link on message: #541465
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Spēles apspriešana\Pamācības\Ko nedariit kaujaa.Link on message: #541465
OldFox: Patikams ir tas, ka musu tulkotajs born2ndjune ne tikai sanems
zeltu par darbu, bet ari, izlasot visas pamacibas, klust par "kruto
speletaju", par "tēti"
OldFox
Lokalizacijas kludas un bagi
12.05.2011 09:10:16
Subject: International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Tehniskā palīdzība\Lokalizacijas kludas un bagi
Link on message: #541461
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Tehniskā palīdzība\Lokalizacijas kludas un bagiLink on message: #541461
OldFox: Viss, draugi, ar so konkursu beigsim.
Uzvaretaji: epror, Alis, madz2d, Vanitars. Visiem tiks pieskirts 2500 zelta.
Darbu turpinam! Nakamais datums, kad mes notieksim labakus testetajus, ir 12 junijs.
Pielikuma kartejais valodas paks.
[attachment=12567:LC_MESSAGES_6.4_LV_11052011.rar]
PS. Tas ir versijas 0.6.4 valodas paks. Tas nozime, ka jagaida patcu 0.6.4 un pec tan jasak testesanu. Patcs bus nakamaja nedela.
Uzvaretaji: epror, Alis, madz2d, Vanitars. Visiem tiks pieskirts 2500 zelta.
Darbu turpinam! Nakamais datums, kad mes notieksim labakus testetajus, ir 12 junijs.
Pielikuma kartejais valodas paks.
[attachment=12567:LC_MESSAGES_6.4_LV_11052011.rar]
PS. Tas ir versijas 0.6.4 valodas paks. Tas nozime, ka jagaida patcu 0.6.4 un pec tan jasak testesanu. Patcs bus nakamaja nedela.
OldFox
Testa serveris un jaunasi pač 6.0.4
12.05.2011 09:02:52
Subject: International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Spēles apspriešana\Vispārējas diskusijas\Testa serveris un jaunasi pač 6.0.4
Link on message: #541447
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Spēles apspriešana\Vispārējas diskusijas\Testa serveris un jaunasi pač 6.0.4Link on message: #541447
OldFox: Gaidam patcu 0.6.4 EU-serveri ap nakamas nedelas vidu.
Overlord
Game stats
12.05.2011 01:35:25
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Game stats
Link on message: #541157
LGPool, on 11 May 2011 - 07:21 PM, said: Hey Overlord! Since you've got nothing more important to do than
gather stats for random forum-posters, could you pick me up a
Chicago-style pizza (sausage, onion, green pepper), a six pack of
good micro-brew (anything Czech will do if they don't have micro)
and a pack of smokes too.
I'll pm you my address.
Thx!
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Game statsLink on message: #541157
LGPool, on 11 May 2011 - 07:21 PM, said: Hey Overlord! Since you've got nothing more important to do than
gather stats for random forum-posters, could you pick me up a
Chicago-style pizza (sausage, onion, green pepper), a six pack of
good micro-brew (anything Czech will do if they don't have micro)
and a pack of smokes too.I'll pm you my address.
Thx!
Overlord: A nice one. But it's not Christmas time, right?!
But it's not Christmas time, right?!LiannaSilverwind
What marks /10 would you give World of Tanks? And what single constructive suggestion do you have for the development team?
11.05.2011 21:33:24
Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\What marks /10 would you give World of Tanks? And what single constructive suggestion do you have for the development team?
Link on message: #540603
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\What marks /10 would you give World of Tanks? And what single constructive suggestion do you have for the development team?Link on message: #540603
LiannaSilverwind: 8/10
Bring in more Game Modes and Historical Battles!
Bring in more Game Modes and Historical Battles!
Vallter
KtM3: Results
11.05.2011 18:25:31
Subject: Contests & Competitions\Special Events\Kill the Mod\KtM3: Results
Link on message: #540153
hja, on 11 May 2011 - 05:10 PM, said: That was fun but mods had little bit fun destroying all these 500
gold winners with their x tanks : ) Damn - 2 weeks of waiting for
the gold : ( maybe you could give me faster in advance? : D
Contests & Competitions\Special Events\Kill the Mod\KtM3: ResultsLink on message: #540153
hja, on 11 May 2011 - 05:10 PM, said: That was fun but mods had little bit fun destroying all these 500
gold winners with their x tanks : ) Damn - 2 weeks of waiting for
the gold : ( maybe you could give me faster in advance? : DVallter: All calculations for the events are done manually and cost some
time. More winners => more time we need to enrol the gold.
Vallter
KtM3: Results
11.05.2011 17:40:42
Subject: Contests & Competitions\Special Events\Kill the Mod\KtM3: Results
Link on message: #540008
nizzie, on 11 May 2011 - 04:34 PM, said: Why is this event for clans/teams only? Why high-end tier only?
Pretty disappointing that solo players and only with low/mid tanks you're excluded.
Contests & Competitions\Special Events\Kill the Mod\KtM3: ResultsLink on message: #540008
nizzie, on 11 May 2011 - 04:34 PM, said: Why is this event for clans/teams only? Why high-end tier only?Pretty disappointing that solo players and only with low/mid tanks you're excluded.
Vallter: Really?
Реклама | Adv