Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
GeneralDirection
Transfer the T3 Tourney to Europe
27.01.2013 08:33:05
Subject: Transfer the T3 Tourney to Europe
Link on message: #3593309
Redwing6, on Jan 27 2013 - 07:06, said: One can always hope, now can't we. You guys blew this in
a big way...as it stands now, my clan and our allies (as well as
dozens of other clans) will no longer pay for
goods or services from WG. I spoke to Jinxx in our TS
server for close to 30 minutes earlier tonight is basic message was
"we screwed up but we're not changing anything."
ALso, you guys have locked and moved all of the threads that had a very long discussion on just what is going on...have you decided to ignore the anger of many of the posters on those threads?
Link on message: #3593309
Redwing6, on Jan 27 2013 - 07:06, said: One can always hope, now can't we. You guys blew this in
a big way...as it stands now, my clan and our allies (as well as
dozens of other clans) will no longer pay for
goods or services from WG. I spoke to Jinxx in our TS
server for close to 30 minutes earlier tonight is basic message was
"we screwed up but we're not changing anything."ALso, you guys have locked and moved all of the threads that had a very long discussion on just what is going on...have you decided to ignore the anger of many of the posters on those threads?
GeneralDirection: Nope, we're redirecting conversation to threads with updated
information. Keeping multiple threads open with outdated
information is not in any way useful.
GeneralDirection
Transfer the T3 Tourney to Europe
27.01.2013 08:03:09
Subject: Transfer the T3 Tourney to Europe
Link on message: #3593060
Link on message: #3593060
GeneralDirection: I fully support this if you can get clans to do it. If you're able
to show us something can be done better I have no problem with
that.
Hypnotik
Clan Wars Timeline (4/1/13 Update)
27.01.2013 05:15:53
Subject: Clan Wars Timeline (4/1/13 Update)
Link on message: #3591452
Zeppelinisgod, on Jan 27 2013 - 01:02, said: This is quite literally the best tool for clan wars now... Tell me
you make money off of this.
ManCowFish, on Jan 27 2013 - 01:38, said: does it take into account offsets? or are the clan stats just the
combined stats of the players, and not their performance in CW?
Nemesis79, on Jan 27 2013 - 01:42, said: Hypotik you are the man.
Zeppelinisgod, on Jan 27 2013 - 01:45, said: I'd rather see performance rating instead of the WN4
ManCowFish, on Jan 27 2013 - 01:48, said: WN6 and PR are good
Efficiency is garbage, you can raise that to 3000 by just farming cap points every game
Link on message: #3591452
Zeppelinisgod, on Jan 27 2013 - 01:02, said: This is quite literally the best tool for clan wars now... Tell me
you make money off of this.Hypnotik: Thank you. I make 10 million Theoretical Dollars per hour.
ManCowFish, on Jan 27 2013 - 01:38, said: does it take into account offsets? or are the clan stats just the
combined stats of the players, and not their performance in CW?Hypnotik: Currently these stats are just the players. I am working on clan
ratings.
Nemesis79, on Jan 27 2013 - 01:42, said: Hypotik you are the man.Hypnotik: I know.
Zeppelinisgod, on Jan 27 2013 - 01:45, said: I'd rather see performance rating instead of the WN4Hypnotik: I looked around for a bit and did not find the formula for the PR.
WN6 will replace WN4 once I set it up and regenerate the data for
all clans on all servers. I'm not a big fan of efficiency rating
either, but it's still the most well-known so I'm going to keep it
there for now.
ManCowFish, on Jan 27 2013 - 01:48, said: WN6 and PR are goodEfficiency is garbage, you can raise that to 3000 by just farming cap points every game
Hypnotik:
dance210
Black Tom 2013 MVP
27.01.2013 03:21:47
Subject: Black Tom 2013 MVP
Link on message: #3590491
markiro, on Jan 27 2013 - 03:12, said: But it says "Tier VIII - X: minimum 120 XP points and 3
achievements."
3 achievements or 3 medals?
Link on message: #3590491
markiro, on Jan 27 2013 - 03:12, said: But it says "Tier VIII - X: minimum 120 XP points and 3
achievements."3 achievements or 3 medals?
dance210: For the purpose of what you are thinking of, the 3 achievements are
basically only the medals listed under the "achievements" on the
news article; Mastery badge isn't on there. I know Major_Rampage
stated damaged and spotted tanks do not count towards any of the
necessary 3 achievements. I think he mentioned Mastery badges
elsewhere, but I will have to search for that reference.
Found it. Part way down the page, Major_Rampage gives his answer in a quote. The person had two medals, master gunner, and mastery badge - only the two medals were considered achievements for hardcore.
Found it. Part way down the page, Major_Rampage gives his answer in a quote. The person had two medals, master gunner, and mastery badge - only the two medals were considered achievements for hardcore.
dance210
Black Tom 2013 MVP
27.01.2013 03:08:05
Subject: Black Tom 2013 MVP
Link on message: #3590368
markiro, on Jan 27 2013 - 03:05, said: Victory!
Battle: Redshire Saturday, January 26, 2013 3:52:44 PM
Vehicle: T110E5
Experience received: 1,360
Credits received: 54,926
Battle Achievements: Radley-Walters's Medal, Top Gun, Mastery Badge: "Ace Tanker"
Spotted tanks: 2
Damaged tanks: 9
________________________________________________
1,360xp (standard account) divided by 10: 136xp points
Medals: Radley-Walters's Medal(4MVP pts)+Top Gun(3MVP pts): 7mvp points
1 point each spotted tank. Spotted tanks: 2 = 2mvp points
2 points each damaged tank. Damaged tanks: 9 = 18 mvp points
Total score = 163
Is this correct?
Link on message: #3590368
markiro, on Jan 27 2013 - 03:05, said: Victory!Battle: Redshire Saturday, January 26, 2013 3:52:44 PM
Vehicle: T110E5
Experience received: 1,360
Credits received: 54,926
Battle Achievements: Radley-Walters's Medal, Top Gun, Mastery Badge: "Ace Tanker"
Spotted tanks: 2
Damaged tanks: 9
________________________________________________
1,360xp (standard account) divided by 10: 136xp points
Medals: Radley-Walters's Medal(4MVP pts)+Top Gun(3MVP pts): 7mvp points
1 point each spotted tank. Spotted tanks: 2 = 2mvp points
2 points each damaged tank. Damaged tanks: 9 = 18 mvp points
Total score = 163
Is this correct?
dance210: For hardcore, you need minimum of 3 medals, you only have two
(Mastery badge doesn't count).
For casual, you do not include the MVP points for damaged/spotted tanks or medals.
For casual, you do not include the MVP points for damaged/spotted tanks or medals.
dance210
Black Tom Weekend
27.01.2013 03:05:21
Subject: Black Tom Weekend
Link on message: #3590344
surforski24, on Jan 26 2013 - 21:54, said: After 2 days of not getting the expected
experience points, I figured that out...sigh. I wanted
it on my tanks, not crews. Yes, very useful, but I'm grinding an
Obj. 268, for over 300K. I was actually planning on
grinding the 704 about 200 times this weekend, to get
it. That crew is already on 2nd or 3rd
skill/perk. Oh well, another month or
so...lol. Thanks for explaining, Wish WOT had made clear
that it was crew ep, not tank ep.
Link on message: #3590344
surforski24, on Jan 26 2013 - 21:54, said: After 2 days of not getting the expected
experience points, I figured that out...sigh. I wanted
it on my tanks, not crews. Yes, very useful, but I'm grinding an
Obj. 268, for over 300K. I was actually planning on
grinding the 704 about 200 times this weekend, to get
it. That crew is already on 2nd or 3rd
skill/perk. Oh well, another month or
so...lol. Thanks for explaining, Wish WOT had made clear
that it was crew ep, not tank ep.dance210: Not for nothing, but how could they have made it any clearer? Just
curious, because it quite distinctly said X2 Crew Experience...
Hypnotik
Clan Wars Timeline (4/1/13 Update)
27.01.2013 01:46:25
Subject: Clan Wars Timeline (4/1/13 Update)
Link on message: #3589660
Link on message: #3589660
Hypnotik: Big Update (1/26/2013)
http://www.clanwarstimeline.com/ext/logo.jpg
NA Server North America Map Added
Clan Ratings/Statistics
Clan Garages
South East Asia Server added
Languages Addedไทย (Thai)Ρусский (Russian)
Clan Ratings/Statistics
This section will be available on every clan's page. Hover over CW Readiness to see how many players in that clan have end-tier tanks, and hover over win rate to see how many battles were won/played by that clan. The bottom row shows an average efficiency rating and WN4 rating for that clan. This will be updated to WN6 shortly.
Clan Garages
This new feature will tell you what tanks and how many each clan has available to them, in addition to their win rate in each. It will also highlight the number of tanks in gold if that clan has the most of it on the server. Color highlighting for tanks is based on a percentile scale at values (96,85,70,50,35,20,0) on a tank-by-tank basis for each server individually.
North America
I thought I got away from separate maps for different regions when Europe/Mediterranean were combined, but there just is no way to efficiently combine the maps with the current set up, and it would be pointless to do so when the Europe/Mediterranean maps are going to be going away soon anyway. So, the blue link on the second line will show you America, while the standard orange shows you Europe/Mediterranean like it always has.
http://www.clanwarstimeline.com/ext/logo.jpg
NA Server North America Map Added
Clan Ratings/Statistics
Clan Garages
South East Asia Server added
Languages Addedไทย (Thai)Ρусский (Russian)
Clan Ratings/Statistics
This section will be available on every clan's page. Hover over CW Readiness to see how many players in that clan have end-tier tanks, and hover over win rate to see how many battles were won/played by that clan. The bottom row shows an average efficiency rating and WN4 rating for that clan. This will be updated to WN6 shortly.
Clan Garages
This new feature will tell you what tanks and how many each clan has available to them, in addition to their win rate in each. It will also highlight the number of tanks in gold if that clan has the most of it on the server. Color highlighting for tanks is based on a percentile scale at values (96,85,70,50,35,20,0) on a tank-by-tank basis for each server individually.
North America
I thought I got away from separate maps for different regions when Europe/Mediterranean were combined, but there just is no way to efficiently combine the maps with the current set up, and it would be pointless to do so when the Europe/Mediterranean maps are going to be going away soon anyway. So, the blue link on the second line will show you America, while the standard orange shows you Europe/Mediterranean like it always has.
Hypnotik
Clan Wars Timeline (4/1/13 Update)
26.01.2013 20:30:32
Subject: Clan Wars Timeline (4/1/13 Update)
Link on message: #3587224
Link on message: #3587224
Hypnotik: I've noticed a good jump in traffic today (presumably people
looking for NA update to the site).
The NA map will be up very soon (hopefully over the weekend), along with another large feature update.
And even though it isn't published yet, the data is still being preserved, so nothing will be lost. The NA map will be shown from the start.
Oh, and also my renderer can color inside the lines (even you, Ohio!).
The NA map will be up very soon (hopefully over the weekend), along with another large feature update.
And even though it isn't published yet, the data is still being preserved, so nothing will be lost. The NA map will be shown from the start.
Oh, and also my renderer can color inside the lines (even you, Ohio!).
Hypnotik
Who and what are the civilians?
26.01.2013 19:22:33
Subject: Who and what are the civilians?
Link on message: #3586639
SULOMON, on Jan 26 2013 - 18:15, said: Then how do the civilians beat clans?
Link on message: #3586639
SULOMON, on Jan 26 2013 - 18:15, said: Then how do the civilians beat clans?Hypnotik: The one in NA happened because there was a draw in the tournament
finals, so neither RDDT or SIMP made it to the battle with the
Civilians. One in Europe was like this, and one in
Mediterranean was a no-show by the clan that won the tourney, so it
becomes a technical victory for the current landholder (Civilians).
dance210
Black Tom 2013 MVP
26.01.2013 14:07:25
Subject: Black Tom 2013 MVP
Link on message: #3584901
GeeForcer, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:56, said: Had a good game, and wanted to make sure I understand the rules...
I do not think I am eligible even though I had a good game.
Victory!
Battle: Ruinberg Friday, January 25, 2013 11:57:58 PM
Vehicle KV-1
Experience received: 1492
Credits Received: 30,294
Battle Achievements: Kolobanov's Medal, Crucial Contribution, De Langlade's Medal, Radley-Walters's Medal, Steel Wall, Top Gun, Invader, Defender, Master Gunner.
1492 exp / 15 (premium) = 99.467 exp points
totals points with medals/damaged tanks = 141.467 (10 damaged tanks)
I missed the min exp points by 8 experience It seems the way the min exp points are set up heavily favors the highest tiers in the brackets... being a tier 5 and getting 1000 base exp is much different than being in a tier 7 and getting 1000.
Hope I'm wrong and can submit this one!
Muppee, on Jan 26 2013 - 10:56, said: Sry for the questioning.
I have just got this.
As the pop up I have Confe + Steel Wall + Sniper = 9 MVP point?
And because Im just a Standard Account so 2.398 / 2 = 1.199 EXP (maximum)
I want to submit to hardcore mode.
how could I calculate Dmg tanks (10 and killed 4) and Spotted tanks (7) ???
Can Mod recorrect for me, so I can submit to the Contest, or can I submit in this topic?
and the large picture
http://www.flickr.co...tream/lightbox/
Skibat, on Jan 26 2013 - 11:23, said: why can I not reach the submissions forum due to not having enough
permissions ? I have an amazing battle I'd like to post but no
ability to
Victory!
Battle: Widepark Saturday, January 26, 2013 9:59:35 AM
Vehicle: IS-3
Experience received: 4,160 (x2 for the first victory each day)
Credits received: 56,091
Battle Achievements: Radley-Walters's Medal, Steel Wall, Top Gun, Sniper
http://i.imgur.com/ijnEKZA.jpg
Beerstein said: So 1 mvp point counts as 1 exp? I don't get it. What wins? More MVP points or more Exp? Or one first then the other if tie, or are mvp points worth a certain amount of xp? What exactly is our goal? I can get 5 medals with bad exp but does that matter without the exp? I can get a lot of exp with 3 medals...honestly I have no clue what we're trying to achieve...
Major_Rampage, on Jan 26 2013 - 04:09, said: Secondly I do surely mean that you would add your XP (after
dividing it by the proper number based on your account being
premium or not), to your MVP points, for the
Hardcore Category.
Link on message: #3584901
GeeForcer, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:56, said: Had a good game, and wanted to make sure I understand the rules...
I do not think I am eligible even though I had a good game.Victory!
Battle: Ruinberg Friday, January 25, 2013 11:57:58 PM
Vehicle KV-1
Experience received: 1492
Credits Received: 30,294
Battle Achievements: Kolobanov's Medal, Crucial Contribution, De Langlade's Medal, Radley-Walters's Medal, Steel Wall, Top Gun, Invader, Defender, Master Gunner.
1492 exp / 15 (premium) = 99.467 exp points
totals points with medals/damaged tanks = 141.467 (10 damaged tanks)
I missed the min exp points by 8 experience It seems the way the min exp points are set up heavily favors the highest tiers in the brackets... being a tier 5 and getting 1000 base exp is much different than being in a tier 7 and getting 1000.
Hope I'm wrong and can submit this one!
dance210: Far as I know, KV-1 is Tier 5, so the minimum experience needed is
100, not 150. Which means you should be good, once the MVP points
where added to your base XP 
Muppee, on Jan 26 2013 - 10:56, said: Sry for the questioning.I have just got this.
As the pop up I have Confe + Steel Wall + Sniper = 9 MVP point?
And because Im just a Standard Account so 2.398 / 2 = 1.199 EXP (maximum)
I want to submit to hardcore mode.
how could I calculate Dmg tanks (10 and killed 4) and Spotted tanks (7) ???
Can Mod recorrect for me, so I can submit to the Contest, or can I submit in this topic?
and the large picture
http://www.flickr.co...tream/lightbox/
dance210: 1. Submissions need to be emailed to events@worldoftanks.com, not
posted on the forums.
2. Ignore tanks killed. So, taking your 9 points from the achievements, your calculations should be:
Damage = 20 MVP (2/tank); spotted = 7 MVP (1/tank)
Base XP: 2,398/2 = 1199/10 (don't forget to divide by 10 for standard!) = 119.9
Total: 119.9 + 20 + 7 + 9 = 155.9
2. Ignore tanks killed. So, taking your 9 points from the achievements, your calculations should be:
Damage = 20 MVP (2/tank); spotted = 7 MVP (1/tank)
Base XP: 2,398/2 = 1199/10 (don't forget to divide by 10 for standard!) = 119.9
Total: 119.9 + 20 + 7 + 9 = 155.9
Skibat, on Jan 26 2013 - 11:23, said: why can I not reach the submissions forum due to not having enough
permissions ? I have an amazing battle I'd like to post but no
ability toVictory!
Battle: Widepark Saturday, January 26, 2013 9:59:35 AM
Vehicle: IS-3
Experience received: 4,160 (x2 for the first victory each day)
Credits received: 56,091
Battle Achievements: Radley-Walters's Medal, Steel Wall, Top Gun, Sniper
http://i.imgur.com/ijnEKZA.jpg
dance210: Because you need to submit your screenshots and calculations to
events@worldoftanks.com; there is no submission thread
Beerstein said: So 1 mvp point counts as 1 exp? I don't get it. What wins? More MVP points or more Exp? Or one first then the other if tie, or are mvp points worth a certain amount of xp? What exactly is our goal? I can get 5 medals with bad exp but does that matter without the exp? I can get a lot of exp with 3 medals...honestly I have no clue what we're trying to achieve...
dance210: Like Major said, the goal for hardcore is to add your total MVP
points for all achievements/damaged/spotted to your base XP for
hardcore submissions.
The goal is to have above the minimum XP scores as posted in the news article. As far as I can tell, that means for hardcore, you can have 5 medals with a bad base XP or only 3 medals but a really good base XP.
For casual, you need a really good base XP since you don't add anything for any points for medals, tanks damaged/spotted. Does this help make it more clear for you?
The goal is to have above the minimum XP scores as posted in the news article. As far as I can tell, that means for hardcore, you can have 5 medals with a bad base XP or only 3 medals but a really good base XP.
For casual, you need a really good base XP since you don't add anything for any points for medals, tanks damaged/spotted. Does this help make it more clear for you?
Major_Rampage, on Jan 26 2013 - 04:09, said: Secondly I do surely mean that you would add your XP (after
dividing it by the proper number based on your account being
premium or not), to your MVP points, for the
Hardcore Category.dance210:
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 11:37:45
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584411
DeputyBeals1pt0, on Jan 26 2013 - 10:26, said: Working as intended huh wargaming
Link on message: #3584411
DeputyBeals1pt0, on Jan 26 2013 - 10:26, said: Working as intended huh wargamingGeneralDirection: I just sent an email about this. This was not supposed to happen
during Unclaimed Glory, to my knowledge.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 11:37:45
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584411
DeputyBeals1pt0, on Jan 26 2013 - 10:26, said: Working as intended huh wargaming
Link on message: #3584411
DeputyBeals1pt0, on Jan 26 2013 - 10:26, said: Working as intended huh wargamingGeneralDirection: I just sent an email about this. This was not supposed to happen
during Unclaimed Glory, to my knowledge.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 11:37:45
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584411
DeputyBeals1pt0, on Jan 26 2013 - 10:26, said: Working as intended huh wargaming
Link on message: #3584411
DeputyBeals1pt0, on Jan 26 2013 - 10:26, said: Working as intended huh wargamingGeneralDirection: I just sent an email about this. This was not supposed to happen
during Unclaimed Glory, to my knowledge.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 11:00:05
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584264
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:49, said: Well please answer my questions. Why are the chips in cool down?
Our clan has no chips to drop. I have been up now for
almost 15hrs cause I am hoping our chips come baack and I can catch
the random popping fo the landing zones.
Link on message: #3584264
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:49, said: Well please answer my questions. Why are the chips in cool down?
Our clan has no chips to drop. I have been up now for
almost 15hrs cause I am hoping our chips come baack and I can catch
the random popping fo the landing zones.GeneralDirection: I've sent an email asking about this. Will let you know when I hear
back.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 11:00:05
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584264
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:49, said: Well please answer my questions. Why are the chips in cool down?
Our clan has no chips to drop. I have been up now for
almost 15hrs cause I am hoping our chips come baack and I can catch
the random popping fo the landing zones.
Link on message: #3584264
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:49, said: Well please answer my questions. Why are the chips in cool down?
Our clan has no chips to drop. I have been up now for
almost 15hrs cause I am hoping our chips come baack and I can catch
the random popping fo the landing zones.GeneralDirection: I've sent an email asking about this. Will let you know when I hear
back.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 11:00:05
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584264
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:49, said: Well please answer my questions. Why are the chips in cool down?
Our clan has no chips to drop. I have been up now for
almost 15hrs cause I am hoping our chips come baack and I can catch
the random popping fo the landing zones.
Link on message: #3584264
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:49, said: Well please answer my questions. Why are the chips in cool down?
Our clan has no chips to drop. I have been up now for
almost 15hrs cause I am hoping our chips come baack and I can catch
the random popping fo the landing zones.GeneralDirection: I've sent an email asking about this. Will let you know when I hear
back.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 10:48:08
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584213
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:46, said: Gerenal. Several questions. Why are the chips on cool
down for all those who placed chips at the correct time but were
not allowed to participate? Does it really matter about
the suppsoed "exciting" 8 new landing zones since the big 3 already
own the entire freakin land mass. I mean really what the
hell. Everything you guys have stated as your hopes and
wishes have not been reflected in your actions. All your
lies have come to light and now you are stumbling over
BS words. You haven't even posted when chips can be
dropped for the next day. BE HONEST AND STOP BS'ing
everyone. Do yoou really want more
clans? What about the chips people have all lost now and
won't have to drop tomorrow? I wish I could just yell right now at
everyone of you but lucky for you, you can just cut and paste some
abbreviated happy BS.
Link on message: #3584213
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:46, said: Gerenal. Several questions. Why are the chips on cool
down for all those who placed chips at the correct time but were
not allowed to participate? Does it really matter about
the suppsoed "exciting" 8 new landing zones since the big 3 already
own the entire freakin land mass. I mean really what the
hell. Everything you guys have stated as your hopes and
wishes have not been reflected in your actions. All your
lies have come to light and now you are stumbling over
BS words. You haven't even posted when chips can be
dropped for the next day. BE HONEST AND STOP BS'ing
everyone. Do yoou really want more
clans? What about the chips people have all lost now and
won't have to drop tomorrow? I wish I could just yell right now at
everyone of you but lucky for you, you can just cut and paste some
abbreviated happy BS.GeneralDirection: I'm on my phone right now so I can assure you I'm not copy/pasting
some 'abbreviated happy bs'.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 10:48:08
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584213
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:46, said: Gerenal. Several questions. Why are the chips on cool
down for all those who placed chips at the correct time but were
not allowed to participate? Does it really matter about
the suppsoed "exciting" 8 new landing zones since the big 3 already
own the entire freakin land mass. I mean really what the
hell. Everything you guys have stated as your hopes and
wishes have not been reflected in your actions. All your
lies have come to light and now you are stumbling over
BS words. You haven't even posted when chips can be
dropped for the next day. BE HONEST AND STOP BS'ing
everyone. Do yoou really want more
clans? What about the chips people have all lost now and
won't have to drop tomorrow? I wish I could just yell right now at
everyone of you but lucky for you, you can just cut and paste some
abbreviated happy BS.
Link on message: #3584213
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:46, said: Gerenal. Several questions. Why are the chips on cool
down for all those who placed chips at the correct time but were
not allowed to participate? Does it really matter about
the suppsoed "exciting" 8 new landing zones since the big 3 already
own the entire freakin land mass. I mean really what the
hell. Everything you guys have stated as your hopes and
wishes have not been reflected in your actions. All your
lies have come to light and now you are stumbling over
BS words. You haven't even posted when chips can be
dropped for the next day. BE HONEST AND STOP BS'ing
everyone. Do yoou really want more
clans? What about the chips people have all lost now and
won't have to drop tomorrow? I wish I could just yell right now at
everyone of you but lucky for you, you can just cut and paste some
abbreviated happy BS.GeneralDirection: I'm on my phone right now so I can assure you I'm not copy/pasting
some 'abbreviated happy bs'.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 10:48:08
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584213
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:46, said: Gerenal. Several questions. Why are the chips on cool
down for all those who placed chips at the correct time but were
not allowed to participate? Does it really matter about
the suppsoed "exciting" 8 new landing zones since the big 3 already
own the entire freakin land mass. I mean really what the
hell. Everything you guys have stated as your hopes and
wishes have not been reflected in your actions. All your
lies have come to light and now you are stumbling over
BS words. You haven't even posted when chips can be
dropped for the next day. BE HONEST AND STOP BS'ing
everyone. Do yoou really want more
clans? What about the chips people have all lost now and
won't have to drop tomorrow? I wish I could just yell right now at
everyone of you but lucky for you, you can just cut and paste some
abbreviated happy BS.
Link on message: #3584213
FaceSplat, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:46, said: Gerenal. Several questions. Why are the chips on cool
down for all those who placed chips at the correct time but were
not allowed to participate? Does it really matter about
the suppsoed "exciting" 8 new landing zones since the big 3 already
own the entire freakin land mass. I mean really what the
hell. Everything you guys have stated as your hopes and
wishes have not been reflected in your actions. All your
lies have come to light and now you are stumbling over
BS words. You haven't even posted when chips can be
dropped for the next day. BE HONEST AND STOP BS'ing
everyone. Do yoou really want more
clans? What about the chips people have all lost now and
won't have to drop tomorrow? I wish I could just yell right now at
everyone of you but lucky for you, you can just cut and paste some
abbreviated happy BS.GeneralDirection: I'm on my phone right now so I can assure you I'm not copy/pasting
some 'abbreviated happy bs'.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 10:46:25
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584207
Shadou3, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:44, said: Although what happened with the premature opening is done, this
first wrong step does not promote much confidence in the future of
this multi-week event.
Link on message: #3584207
Shadou3, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:44, said: Although what happened with the premature opening is done, this
first wrong step does not promote much confidence in the future of
this multi-week event.GeneralDirection: That's understandable, and something we will have to overcome by
proving ourselves.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 10:46:25
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584207
Shadou3, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:44, said: Although what happened with the premature opening is done, this
first wrong step does not promote much confidence in the future of
this multi-week event.
Link on message: #3584207
Shadou3, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:44, said: Although what happened with the premature opening is done, this
first wrong step does not promote much confidence in the future of
this multi-week event.GeneralDirection: That's understandable, and something we will have to overcome by
proving ourselves.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 10:46:25
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584207
Shadou3, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:44, said: Although what happened with the premature opening is done, this
first wrong step does not promote much confidence in the future of
this multi-week event.
Link on message: #3584207
Shadou3, on Jan 26 2013 - 09:44, said: Although what happened with the premature opening is done, this
first wrong step does not promote much confidence in the future of
this multi-week event.GeneralDirection: That's understandable, and something we will have to overcome by
proving ourselves.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 10:04:26
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584053
Dukebarry, on Jan 26 2013 - 08:28, said: Just wait soon we will be routed to a call center in India that
will listen with great concern to our complaints, apologize then do
nothing about it.
If Clan wars cant be more inclusive then a lot of players will end up leaving the game.
As it stands right now if your not part of the big 4 or 5 clans you are just a pimple, on WG ass.
How did G Havok and Forge manage to get chips down hours before they were supposed to be able too and hold the first 3 territories?
General Direction do you care about independent clans?
Link on message: #3584053
Dukebarry, on Jan 26 2013 - 08:28, said: Just wait soon we will be routed to a call center in India that
will listen with great concern to our complaints, apologize then do
nothing about it.If Clan wars cant be more inclusive then a lot of players will end up leaving the game.
As it stands right now if your not part of the big 4 or 5 clans you are just a pimple, on WG ass.
How did G Havok and Forge manage to get chips down hours before they were supposed to be able too and hold the first 3 territories?
General Direction do you care about independent clans?
GeneralDirection: Of course I do. The only way the map will be healthy and
competitive is if more clans participate. We aren't fans of a map
being dominated to the extent that land doesn't need to be defended
on a frequent basis.
Data from the RU cluster is showing that Riots and Pillaging are helping with that. Unfortunately there were a few issues with it we need to fix, so it wasn't enabled with the NA event.
Even with the above, we will continue to discuss and develop features to allow more clans a chance to play in clan wars, and actually be prepared for it.
We're not going to hand you land on a silver platter--you'll need to earn it--but we want you to at least experience clan wars. This event is obviously showing so far that it's not the case. Hopefully it pans out better tomorrow and more clans can settle in and make a push for the payout provinces.
Data from the RU cluster is showing that Riots and Pillaging are helping with that. Unfortunately there were a few issues with it we need to fix, so it wasn't enabled with the NA event.
Even with the above, we will continue to discuss and develop features to allow more clans a chance to play in clan wars, and actually be prepared for it.
We're not going to hand you land on a silver platter--you'll need to earn it--but we want you to at least experience clan wars. This event is obviously showing so far that it's not the case. Hopefully it pans out better tomorrow and more clans can settle in and make a push for the payout provinces.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 10:04:26
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584053
Dukebarry, on Jan 26 2013 - 08:28, said: Just wait soon we will be routed to a call center in India that
will listen with great concern to our complaints, apologize then do
nothing about it.
If Clan wars cant be more inclusive then a lot of players will end up leaving the game.
As it stands right now if your not part of the big 4 or 5 clans you are just a pimple, on WG ass.
How did G Havok and Forge manage to get chips down hours before they were supposed to be able too and hold the first 3 territories?
General Direction do you care about independent clans?
Link on message: #3584053
Dukebarry, on Jan 26 2013 - 08:28, said: Just wait soon we will be routed to a call center in India that
will listen with great concern to our complaints, apologize then do
nothing about it.If Clan wars cant be more inclusive then a lot of players will end up leaving the game.
As it stands right now if your not part of the big 4 or 5 clans you are just a pimple, on WG ass.
How did G Havok and Forge manage to get chips down hours before they were supposed to be able too and hold the first 3 territories?
General Direction do you care about independent clans?
GeneralDirection: Of course I do. The only way the map will be healthy and
competitive is if more clans participate. We aren't fans of a map
being dominated to the extent that land doesn't need to be defended
on a frequent basis.
Data from the RU cluster is showing that Riots and Pillaging are helping with that. Unfortunately there were a few issues with it we need to fix, so it wasn't enabled with the NA event.
Even with the above, we will continue to discuss and develop features to allow more clans a chance to play in clan wars, and actually be prepared for it.
We're not going to hand you land on a silver platter--you'll need to earn it--but we want you to at least experience clan wars. This event is obviously showing so far that it's not the case. Hopefully it pans out better tomorrow and more clans can settle in and make a push for the payout provinces.
Data from the RU cluster is showing that Riots and Pillaging are helping with that. Unfortunately there were a few issues with it we need to fix, so it wasn't enabled with the NA event.
Even with the above, we will continue to discuss and develop features to allow more clans a chance to play in clan wars, and actually be prepared for it.
We're not going to hand you land on a silver platter--you'll need to earn it--but we want you to at least experience clan wars. This event is obviously showing so far that it's not the case. Hopefully it pans out better tomorrow and more clans can settle in and make a push for the payout provinces.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 10:04:26
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3584053
Dukebarry, on Jan 26 2013 - 08:28, said: Just wait soon we will be routed to a call center in India that
will listen with great concern to our complaints, apologize then do
nothing about it.
If Clan wars cant be more inclusive then a lot of players will end up leaving the game.
As it stands right now if your not part of the big 4 or 5 clans you are just a pimple, on WG ass.
How did G Havok and Forge manage to get chips down hours before they were supposed to be able too and hold the first 3 territories?
General Direction do you care about independent clans?
Link on message: #3584053
Dukebarry, on Jan 26 2013 - 08:28, said: Just wait soon we will be routed to a call center in India that
will listen with great concern to our complaints, apologize then do
nothing about it.If Clan wars cant be more inclusive then a lot of players will end up leaving the game.
As it stands right now if your not part of the big 4 or 5 clans you are just a pimple, on WG ass.
How did G Havok and Forge manage to get chips down hours before they were supposed to be able too and hold the first 3 territories?
General Direction do you care about independent clans?
GeneralDirection: Of course I do. The only way the map will be healthy and
competitive is if more clans participate. We aren't fans of a map
being dominated to the extent that land doesn't need to be defended
on a frequent basis.
Data from the RU cluster is showing that Riots and Pillaging are helping with that. Unfortunately there were a few issues with it we need to fix, so it wasn't enabled with the NA event.
Even with the above, we will continue to discuss and develop features to allow more clans a chance to play in clan wars, and actually be prepared for it.
We're not going to hand you land on a silver platter--you'll need to earn it--but we want you to at least experience clan wars. This event is obviously showing so far that it's not the case. Hopefully it pans out better tomorrow and more clans can settle in and make a push for the payout provinces.
Data from the RU cluster is showing that Riots and Pillaging are helping with that. Unfortunately there were a few issues with it we need to fix, so it wasn't enabled with the NA event.
Even with the above, we will continue to discuss and develop features to allow more clans a chance to play in clan wars, and actually be prepared for it.
We're not going to hand you land on a silver platter--you'll need to earn it--but we want you to at least experience clan wars. This event is obviously showing so far that it's not the case. Hopefully it pans out better tomorrow and more clans can settle in and make a push for the payout provinces.
GeneralDirection
CONGRATULATIONS TO CIVILIANS
26.01.2013 09:56:57
Subject: CONGRATULATIONS TO CIVILIANS
Link on message: #3584024
Link on message: #3584024
GeneralDirection: The civilians are boss. Haven't you guys seen Red Dawn?
GeneralDirection
CONGRATULATIONS TO CIVILIANS
26.01.2013 09:56:57
Subject: CONGRATULATIONS TO CIVILIANS
Link on message: #3584024
Link on message: #3584024
GeneralDirection: The civilians are boss. Haven't you guys seen Red Dawn?
GeneralDirection
CONGRATULATIONS TO CIVILIANS
26.01.2013 09:56:57
Subject: CONGRATULATIONS TO CIVILIANS
Link on message: #3584024
Link on message: #3584024
GeneralDirection: The civilians are boss. Haven't you guys seen Red Dawn?
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 08:53:06
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3583724
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:50, said: If you are going to take that position, then you needed to make
that limit very very clear, limit each clan to a single landing,
opened the chipping on time not 4 hours too early, and prevented
people from laying chips down after the 64 spots were all taken (or
at least flashed them an alert). As it was, this limit
was shortsighted since the event was loudly billed as the
opportunity for the little guys to participate in clan wars and
that there would be room for all, which as clearly shown above it
was most certainly not the case. The complete bungling
of this event has made a large portion of the community mad and has
soured CW to many smaller clans who just wanted a chance to
participate.
Link on message: #3583724
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:50, said: If you are going to take that position, then you needed to make
that limit very very clear, limit each clan to a single landing,
opened the chipping on time not 4 hours too early, and prevented
people from laying chips down after the 64 spots were all taken (or
at least flashed them an alert). As it was, this limit
was shortsighted since the event was loudly billed as the
opportunity for the little guys to participate in clan wars and
that there would be room for all, which as clearly shown above it
was most certainly not the case. The complete bungling
of this event has made a large portion of the community mad and has
soured CW to many smaller clans who just wanted a chance to
participate.GeneralDirection: Yes, I agree the limit needs to be made clear. I will make sure
Gaea includes that in any feedback we report to the development
team. It's not necessarily related to this event, but the event did
show it as a weakness in the way landing tournaments are applied
for.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 08:53:06
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3583724
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:50, said: If you are going to take that position, then you needed to make
that limit very very clear, limit each clan to a single landing,
opened the chipping on time not 4 hours too early, and prevented
people from laying chips down after the 64 spots were all taken (or
at least flashed them an alert). As it was, this limit
was shortsighted since the event was loudly billed as the
opportunity for the little guys to participate in clan wars and
that there would be room for all, which as clearly shown above it
was most certainly not the case. The complete bungling
of this event has made a large portion of the community mad and has
soured CW to many smaller clans who just wanted a chance to
participate.
Link on message: #3583724
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:50, said: If you are going to take that position, then you needed to make
that limit very very clear, limit each clan to a single landing,
opened the chipping on time not 4 hours too early, and prevented
people from laying chips down after the 64 spots were all taken (or
at least flashed them an alert). As it was, this limit
was shortsighted since the event was loudly billed as the
opportunity for the little guys to participate in clan wars and
that there would be room for all, which as clearly shown above it
was most certainly not the case. The complete bungling
of this event has made a large portion of the community mad and has
soured CW to many smaller clans who just wanted a chance to
participate.GeneralDirection: Yes, I agree the limit needs to be made clear. I will make sure
Gaea includes that in any feedback we report to the development
team. It's not necessarily related to this event, but the event did
show it as a weakness in the way landing tournaments are applied
for.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 08:53:06
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3583724
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:50, said: If you are going to take that position, then you needed to make
that limit very very clear, limit each clan to a single landing,
opened the chipping on time not 4 hours too early, and prevented
people from laying chips down after the 64 spots were all taken (or
at least flashed them an alert). As it was, this limit
was shortsighted since the event was loudly billed as the
opportunity for the little guys to participate in clan wars and
that there would be room for all, which as clearly shown above it
was most certainly not the case. The complete bungling
of this event has made a large portion of the community mad and has
soured CW to many smaller clans who just wanted a chance to
participate.
Link on message: #3583724
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:50, said: If you are going to take that position, then you needed to make
that limit very very clear, limit each clan to a single landing,
opened the chipping on time not 4 hours too early, and prevented
people from laying chips down after the 64 spots were all taken (or
at least flashed them an alert). As it was, this limit
was shortsighted since the event was loudly billed as the
opportunity for the little guys to participate in clan wars and
that there would be room for all, which as clearly shown above it
was most certainly not the case. The complete bungling
of this event has made a large portion of the community mad and has
soured CW to many smaller clans who just wanted a chance to
participate.GeneralDirection: Yes, I agree the limit needs to be made clear. I will make sure
Gaea includes that in any feedback we report to the development
team. It's not necessarily related to this event, but the event did
show it as a weakness in the way landing tournaments are applied
for.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 08:48:51
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3583701
Painbringer71, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:47, said: No notice of 64 spots are taken when clan leaders place chips for
the night is FAIL.....
Link on message: #3583701
Painbringer71, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:47, said: No notice of 64 spots are taken when clan leaders place chips for
the night is FAIL.....GeneralDirection: This is true. I definitely agree a notice should be added.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 08:48:51
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3583701
Painbringer71, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:47, said: No notice of 64 spots are taken when clan leaders place chips for
the night is FAIL.....
Link on message: #3583701
Painbringer71, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:47, said: No notice of 64 spots are taken when clan leaders place chips for
the night is FAIL.....GeneralDirection: This is true. I definitely agree a notice should be added.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 08:48:51
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3583701
Painbringer71, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:47, said: No notice of 64 spots are taken when clan leaders place chips for
the night is FAIL.....
Link on message: #3583701
Painbringer71, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:47, said: No notice of 64 spots are taken when clan leaders place chips for
the night is FAIL.....GeneralDirection: This is true. I definitely agree a notice should be added.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 08:43:27
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3583670
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:23, said: So in conclusion, the "pants on head retarded" tier 3 CW was
defended on the basis that it would give smaller clans a chance to
participate. And yet when we look at the stats a very
small percentage of those who even tried to participate got the
lion's share of the landing spots due to a stupid shortsighted 256
spot cap and not limiting each clan to a single spot.
Link on message: #3583670
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:23, said: So in conclusion, the "pants on head retarded" tier 3 CW was
defended on the basis that it would give smaller clans a chance to
participate. And yet when we look at the stats a very
small percentage of those who even tried to participate got the
lion's share of the landing spots due to a stupid shortsighted 256
spot cap and not limiting each clan to a single spot.GeneralDirection: You say this as if today is the only day this is going on. All
those clans on the map now can't land on the 8 new landing zones
opening tomorrow. Regarding the 256 spot cap, that is not
shortsighted--that is fully intentional to avoid potential server
issues and to prevent landing tournaments from lasting until the AM
hours of the morning.
The early opening of the map sucks--everyone on my team and in the NA office agrees with you. But the reality is this is the first day of a multi-week event. The gold prize is what you should be most interested in, which isn't handed out until the 7th.
The early opening of the map sucks--everyone on my team and in the NA office agrees with you. But the reality is this is the first day of a multi-week event. The gold prize is what you should be most interested in, which isn't handed out until the 7th.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 08:43:27
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3583670
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:23, said: So in conclusion, the "pants on head retarded" tier 3 CW was
defended on the basis that it would give smaller clans a chance to
participate. And yet when we look at the stats a very
small percentage of those who even tried to participate got the
lion's share of the landing spots due to a stupid shortsighted 256
spot cap and not limiting each clan to a single spot.
Link on message: #3583670
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:23, said: So in conclusion, the "pants on head retarded" tier 3 CW was
defended on the basis that it would give smaller clans a chance to
participate. And yet when we look at the stats a very
small percentage of those who even tried to participate got the
lion's share of the landing spots due to a stupid shortsighted 256
spot cap and not limiting each clan to a single spot.GeneralDirection: You say this as if today is the only day this is going on. All
those clans on the map now can't land on the 8 new landing zones
opening tomorrow. Regarding the 256 spot cap, that is not
shortsighted--that is fully intentional to avoid potential server
issues and to prevent landing tournaments from lasting until the AM
hours of the morning.
The early opening of the map sucks--everyone on my team and in the NA office agrees with you. But the reality is this is the first day of a multi-week event. The gold prize is what you should be most interested in, which isn't handed out until the 7th.
The early opening of the map sucks--everyone on my team and in the NA office agrees with you. But the reality is this is the first day of a multi-week event. The gold prize is what you should be most interested in, which isn't handed out until the 7th.
GeneralDirection
Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
26.01.2013 08:43:27
Subject: Statistics on the North America CW 1/26/13
Link on message: #3583670
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:23, said: So in conclusion, the "pants on head retarded" tier 3 CW was
defended on the basis that it would give smaller clans a chance to
participate. And yet when we look at the stats a very
small percentage of those who even tried to participate got the
lion's share of the landing spots due to a stupid shortsighted 256
spot cap and not limiting each clan to a single spot.
Link on message: #3583670
Sieg_Oder_Valhalla, on Jan 26 2013 - 07:23, said: So in conclusion, the "pants on head retarded" tier 3 CW was
defended on the basis that it would give smaller clans a chance to
participate. And yet when we look at the stats a very
small percentage of those who even tried to participate got the
lion's share of the landing spots due to a stupid shortsighted 256
spot cap and not limiting each clan to a single spot.GeneralDirection: You say this as if today is the only day this is going on. All
those clans on the map now can't land on the 8 new landing zones
opening tomorrow. Regarding the 256 spot cap, that is not
shortsighted--that is fully intentional to avoid potential server
issues and to prevent landing tournaments from lasting until the AM
hours of the morning.
The early opening of the map sucks--everyone on my team and in the NA office agrees with you. But the reality is this is the first day of a multi-week event. The gold prize is what you should be most interested in, which isn't handed out until the 7th.
The early opening of the map sucks--everyone on my team and in the NA office agrees with you. But the reality is this is the first day of a multi-week event. The gold prize is what you should be most interested in, which isn't handed out until the 7th.
dance210
Black Tom 2013 MVP
26.01.2013 06:20:18
Subject: Black Tom 2013 MVP
Link on message: #3582652
sirhc, on Jan 26 2013 - 06:03, said: Im confused about
How to Calculate Your XP
If you have a premium account: Divide total XP by 15 = XP points.
If you have a standard account: Divide total XP by 10 = XP points
Remember to divide by 2 if you earn double XP.
Example: If you've earned 726 XP and you have a standard account you'd divide 725 by 10 to get 72.5 XP points (725/10=72.5 XP).
So if i have a premium account and i earn double xp, i divide by 2 than i divide by 15?
Link on message: #3582652
sirhc, on Jan 26 2013 - 06:03, said: Im confused aboutHow to Calculate Your XP
If you have a premium account: Divide total XP by 15 = XP points.
If you have a standard account: Divide total XP by 10 = XP points
Remember to divide by 2 if you earn double XP.
Example: If you've earned 726 XP and you have a standard account you'd divide 725 by 10 to get 72.5 XP points (725/10=72.5 XP).
So if i have a premium account and i earn double xp, i divide by 2 than i divide by 15?
dance210: I tried a couple of different numbers, and it didn't matter if I
divided by 2 first, or by 15 first. I am assuming (perhaps
incorrectly) that the math will always work out the same whichever
way you do it, no matter what you start with.
GeneralDirection
New Contest Idea
26.01.2013 05:14:49
Subject: New Contest Idea
Link on message: #3582073
Link on message: #3582073
GeneralDirection: Three people so far dislike fun.
In all seriousness though, if you do vote no, please let us know why. There's always a possibility we're not thinking of something that you are, so it's helpful to get perspective from every angle.
In all seriousness though, if you do vote no, please let us know why. There's always a possibility we're not thinking of something that you are, so it's helpful to get perspective from every angle.
GeneralDirection
New Contest Idea
26.01.2013 05:14:49
Subject: New Contest Idea
Link on message: #3582073
Link on message: #3582073
GeneralDirection: Three people so far dislike fun.
In all seriousness though, if you do vote no, please let us know why. There's always a possibility we're not thinking of something that you are, so it's helpful to get perspective from every angle.
In all seriousness though, if you do vote no, please let us know why. There's always a possibility we're not thinking of something that you are, so it's helpful to get perspective from every angle.
Реклама | Adv