Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
Asklepi0s
OP EBR
arrow
20.05.2019 12:38:22
 
Subject: OP EBR
Link on message: #16906528

Asklepi0s: Thread has been closed by the moderation team due to not being constructive.


Asklepi0s
Love this arty nerf!
arrow
20.05.2019 12:29:38
 
Subject: Love this arty nerf!
Link on message: #16906501

Asklepi0s: Thread is closed.
Please use the pinned thread.


Asklepi0s
Arty or No Arties?
arrow
20.05.2019 12:27:40
 
Subject: Arty or No Arties?
Link on message: #16906489

Asklepi0s: Thread is closed please use the pinned thread.


eekeeboo
Historical Special: the Battle of Monte Cassino
arrow
20.05.2019 12:23:17
 
Subject: Historical Special: the Battle of Monte Cassino
Link on message: #16906476

View Postkaneloon, on 20 May 2019 - 08:48 AM, said: Same as gunslinger, plus rewards should be different : why have the same emblems ? 08:49 Added after 1 minute   My top heavy is the tiger II, good luck with farming bounces ...

eekeeboo:   My top heavy is the tiger II, good luck with farming bounces ...   If you bounce 1 shell a game it will all add up to the bear emblem! 


eekeeboo
Transition From Launcher to Wargaming.net Game Center
arrow
20.05.2019 12:14:22
 
Subject: Transition From Launcher to Wargaming.net Game Center
Link on message: #16906447

View PostDanger__UXB, on 19 May 2019 - 04:28 PM, said:  

eekeeboo:   Firstly you need to adhere to the forum rules and follow the particular instances about redirecting to certain pages with certain content, next please consider the actual context of the image and its relevance to this topic and publisher. 


eekeeboo
Transition From Launcher to Wargaming.net Game Center
arrow
20.05.2019 12:10:52
 
Subject: Transition From Launcher to Wargaming.net Game Center
Link on message: #16906436

View PostDon_71, on 16 May 2019 - 04:43 PM, said:   No, I will not need to use your crap-tool - I will simply go and uninstall WoT. :justwait: By forcing that WGC on me, you'll just provide the last little bit of motivation to make me go spend my funds elsewhere. This tool will MOVE AWAY the next batch of your long-term players and supporters - congrats, WG shall soon save even more on server-costs... :facepalm:     WG should consider that most of the folks you keep annoying again and again already sunk more cash into your "free to play" than in any full-price AAA-title. Better realize and respect that and start delivering long over due game-balance (matchmaker not considering the PR, wtf?), new (or even old) maps etc, instead of just asking for even more cash day by day.     What WG really needs to do asap is get back to pleasing their customers again - and therefore they first need to develope a much better understanding of what's annoying the playerbase and driving it away to other games.  

eekeeboo:   It's impossible to please everyone all the time and actually detrimental to try and please people who would take more resources than those you can please and support without the changes required by others who are not more important to the game. Many customers are already happy, if you are not, this is unfortunate, but if you are pushed to such displeasure from using a tool and service that is a requirement moving forward for a variety of reasons then this is an unfortunate consequence.     


eekeeboo
Stock up for the Ranked Battles
arrow
20.05.2019 12:01:40
 
Subject: Stock up for the Ranked Battles
Link on message: #16906412

View PostCpt_VV, on 20 May 2019 - 07:38 AM, said: This kind of selling-begging for money actions on almost every day basis just went from sad to disgraceful. 

eekeeboo:   Please be aware any company that sells things will advertise the things they want to sell on a frequent basis to maximise the potential sales. This isn't begging, this is marketing and sales.   

View PostTungstenHitman, on 20 May 2019 - 07:42 AM, said:   So I clicked on that link which brings us to a "Stock up for ranked battles" page trying to flog some stuff, fine, but there is a quote with a link "Can't decide on the tank you want to go for? Find our recommended vehicles for this season here" yet when that link is selected it only opens the same bloody window again, seriously?

eekeeboo:   Can you please verify this issue is still the case for you, when i click it, I am redirected to the article we posted about Ranked Tank suggestions. 


Berbo
The 2019 Season of Ranked Battles Is Here!
arrow
20.05.2019 11:51:01
 
Subject: The 2019 Season of Ranked Battles Is Here!
Link on message: #16906384

Berbo: Hello all,   Please don't confuse "season" start and end date with actual prime times. The actual "playing part" unlocks at 14:00 CEST.   Also, for anyone looking for more info about the mode and rewards, I highly recommend the ranked guide which can be found in the portal article.   Cheers


thePhilX
Rüstet euch für die Gewerteten Gefechte
arrow
20.05.2019 11:36:08
 
Subject: Rüstet euch für die Gewerteten Gefechte
Link on message: #16906346

View PostFeivel03, on 20 May 2019 - 05:23 AM, said: Wie oft darf man das kaufen? Das beste Angebot seit Stunden. Ps: der link in der Nachricht ist eine dauerschleife. Ich probiere schon seit 15 minuten zu den empfohlenen panzern zu kommen.

thePhilX:   So oft du willst :coin:   Bei mir funktioniert der Link (sowohl am PC, als auch am Smartphone). Alternativ kannst du auch den LINK benutzen.


Delhroh
DelhRoh fuera de la oficina hasta el 20/05/19
arrow
20.05.2019 11:20:31
 
Subject: DelhRoh fuera de la oficina hasta el 20/05/19
Link on message: #16906319

Delhroh: ¡Konichi wa, Comunidad-sama!   Aprovecho este hilo para indicar que ya he regresado de vacaciones.  Hoy me pondré al día y mañana responderé los mensajes privados pendientes.   ¡Un placer estar de vuelta!


Asklepi0s
Arty got nerfed?
arrow
20.05.2019 11:14:57
 
Subject: Arty got nerfed?
Link on message: #16906312

Asklepi0s: Please use the pinned thread.


Asklepi0s
Why they are in every T10 game 3x artillery !
arrow
20.05.2019 11:13:00
 
Subject: Why they are in every T10 game 3x artillery !
Link on message: #16906309

Asklepi0s: Thread is closed due to being non constructive.


Berbo
Easy Vehicles for Ranked Battles
arrow
20.05.2019 03:25:10
 
Subject: Easy Vehicles for Ranked Battles
Link on message: #16905916

View PostRedlineSnieperTom, on 18 May 2019 - 02:37 PM, said: You are right, the definition of easy to play differs per player. However, in general we can conclude that tanks without too much armor harder to play because you get punished for your own stupidity. This is why I think Patton for example is not a easy to play tank for casual players, as it is described in the article. 

Berbo:   I agree what you said in your first sentence :) However, for the second one I have proofs which say that Patton is not THAT difficult to play. I was thinking exactly what you were thinking but trust me, people don't find it hard to play at least in ranked. Same is with S Conq, appears to be difficult due to lack of armor, engine issues etc but performs well anyway.   In any case, what we all can conclude is we all have specific play styles and if you play well, you'll do well with any tank and vice versa. My recommendation would be to limit yourself to max 2 tanks and only play those if you're planning to rank up. I'll probably play something like 5A, 113, Is7.   Cheers


Asklepi0s
90% of the player base says... remove arty... WG is like.. nope, [edited]you...
arrow
19.05.2019 13:13:07
 
Subject: 90% of the player base says... remove arty... WG is like.. nope, [edited]you...
Link on message: #16904620

Asklepi0s: This thread has been closed by the moderation team..
Please use the pinned thread for your feedback.


Asklepi0s
How is this against chat rules?
arrow
19.05.2019 12:37:44
 
Subject: How is this against chat rules?
Link on message: #16904573

Asklepi0s: This thread has been closed by moderation team due to rule violation on opening post


Falathi
Łatwe pojazdy do bitew rankingowych
arrow
18.05.2019 19:06:31
 
Subject: Łatwe pojazdy do bitew rankingowych
Link on message: #16903596

View Postrobak118, on 18 May 2019 - 04:56 PM, said: Aha, to niezły mózg hahaha. No jeszcze 430u bym dołożył no i oczywiście 907,ale pewnie nie wymieniłes z uwagi, że to czołg specjalny. 

Falathi:   Owszem, jestem pewien że 907 będzie jeździć sporo ale to czołg, którego nie można ot tak wybadać i ich pula jest ograniczona. Sugerowanie grania czołgiem, który obecnie jest nie do dostania byłoby trochę bez sensu. 


Falathi
chi to tier VI japonia
arrow
18.05.2019 18:55:37
 
Subject: chi to tier VI japonia
Link on message: #16903570

Falathi: Pytanie, jakie to miało wyposażenie poza dodatkowym radiem. 


Falathi
chi to tier VI japonia
arrow
18.05.2019 18:25:58
 
Subject: chi to tier VI japonia
Link on message: #16903526

View PostPaythos, on 18 May 2019 - 09:25 AM, said: Ehh... koteczku... ty chyba chcesz zostać politykiem, tak fajnie wyciągasz zdania z kontekstu...:trollface: Albo źle napisałem albo źle zrozumiałeś. Chodziło o to że nie wiem, czy były jakieś takie centralki ogniowe i tym podobne dynksy na podwoziach czołgów w czasie 2W, zaś na pewno znałem tą na podwoziu Vomag:P    

Falathi:   Sam nigdy nie zetknąłem się z czymś takim - no chyba, żeby uwzględnić wóz obserwacyjny artylerii na podwoziu Pantery, ale nie wiem, jakie miał wyposażenie optyczne. Nigdy nie trafiłem na zdjęcie takiej centrali ogniowej/dalmierza na podwoziu czołgu - to nie znaczy, że na pewno ich nie było ale sugeruje, że nawet jeśli były to nie produkowano ich powszechnie.  No i co do wzmiankowanej Pantery - nie jestem pewien, ile ich wyprodukowano, jeśli w ogóle. 


Falathi
Łatwe pojazdy do bitew rankingowych
arrow
18.05.2019 18:13:03
 
Subject: Łatwe pojazdy do bitew rankingowych
Link on message: #16903496

View Postrobak118, on 18 May 2019 - 03:52 PM, said:   Polecam wszystkim jednak wybrać jakiegos ruskiego meda zamiast Pattona.  PS moim zdaniem 10-10*10+10= -80, Falathi, chyba, że się nie znam na tego typu żartach.

Falathi:   Ruskiego poza Obiektem 140 bym nie brał. 
A co do drugiej kwestii masz oczywiście rację, tekst w sygnaturze to tekst, który kiedyś padł na tym forum :D


Falathi
Łatwe pojazdy do bitew rankingowych
arrow
18.05.2019 15:59:52
 
Subject: Łatwe pojazdy do bitew rankingowych
Link on message: #16903269

View Postrobak118, on 18 May 2019 - 12:32 PM, said: Patton łatwy w grze?? HAHA

Falathi:   Prawdę mówiąc, w poprzednim sezonie gdy dowiedziałem się tego i owego o tym jak nim grać to okazał się - zwłaszcza na Prochorowce i Malinowce - bardzo skuteczny.


eekeeboo
Easy Vehicles for Ranked Battles
arrow
18.05.2019 15:52:13
 
Subject: Easy Vehicles for Ranked Battles
Link on message: #16903259

View PostWindSplitter1, on 18 May 2019 - 12:09 PM, said: Most of them have heavy armour.   What a surprise...

eekeeboo:   Armour does = safety and you're allowed to make a few more mistakes than say... a batchat :D 


Falathi
Sezon 2019 bitew rankingowych już tu jest!
arrow
18.05.2019 15:36:30
 
Subject: Sezon 2019 bitew rankingowych już tu jest!
Link on message: #16903235

View Postjedi_nedved, on 17 May 2019 - 04:54 PM, said: Bo od tygodnia co chwila gdzieś jest o nim mowa. Kręci się w przerębli nie bez powodu...

Falathi:   Masz rację i kręci się po levelu jak opętany - ale w związku z czym innym :) 


Falathi
Oferta specjalna: Wysiłek drużynowy
arrow
18.05.2019 15:33:17
 
Subject: Oferta specjalna: Wysiłek drużynowy
Link on message: #16903229

View PostMsciboj, on 17 May 2019 - 08:18 PM, said: Nie aż tak dużo, raptem w kwietniu tylko 70k nowych kont. I to licznych ofertach na Alledrogo. Pograj sobie na niższych tierach.

Falathi:   To akurat żaden argument - w WoT od zawsze była masa graczy, których umiejętności są średnie i którzy raczej zostają na niższych tierach więc poziom gry na nich nie musi być jakoś obłędnie wysoki. Są też ludzie, którzy specjalnie tam siedzą bo mogą łatwo wbić fioletowe staty.   


Falathi
Łatwe pojazdy do bitew rankingowych
arrow
18.05.2019 14:18:35
 
Subject: Łatwe pojazdy do bitew rankingowych
Link on message: #16903114

View Postszfak, on 18 May 2019 - 10:39 AM, said: Latwe pojazdy i WG nie wspomina o guanomiotach? Czyzby w koncu nie mozna bylo grac arta w trybie sprawdzajacym umiejetnosci gracza? :O

Falathi:   Nie mamy obowiązku o nich wspominać ;) Zresztą artykuł koncentruje się raczej na maszynach, które powinny być łatwe w graniu w tym trybie. 


Falathi
Caernarvon Action X, czołg z jednorożcem
arrow
18.05.2019 14:13:57
 
Subject: Caernarvon Action X, czołg z jednorożcem
Link on message: #16903100

View PostWarMachine_31, on 18 May 2019 - 05:12 AM, said:   Cearnarvon z drzewka zapewnia te same wrażenia. Niektóre parametry ciut lepsze inne ciut gorsze.

Falathi:   I to jest zamierzone - ten sam styl gry oznacza, że dla kogoś kto jest zainteresowany robieniem tej linii premka stanowi dobry wóz treningowy do szkolenia załogi, ale też do nauki stylu gry. W dodatku premka nie jest OP, co chyba powinno cieszyć :)   

View PostNatural__, on 18 May 2019 - 06:17 AM, said: Do poważniejszych "wad" drzewkowego, zaliczylbym gorsze zarobki oraz gorsze szkolenie załogi.  

Falathi:   Zgadza się - ale to normalne że premka będzie mieć przewagę w tych dwóch aspektach. Inaczej nie miałaby wielkiego sensu. 


Asklepi0s
Friendly ramming/pushing followed by a horsepower duel...
arrow
18.05.2019 13:41:08
 
Subject: Friendly ramming/pushing followed by a horsepower duel...
Link on message: #16903039

Asklepi0s: Thread has been closed by the moderation team due non constructive thread.


Berbo
Easy Vehicles for Ranked Battles
arrow
18.05.2019 13:33:25
 
Subject: Easy Vehicles for Ranked Battles
Link on message: #16903021

View PostSfinski, on 18 May 2019 - 09:29 AM, said: So clueless. Only 430U is "easy" vehicle out of all of them. Jagdpanzer E 100 for ranked? Top kek.

Berbo:  

View PostRedlineSnieperTom, on 18 May 2019 - 09:56 AM, said: Maus easy to play? Turn your turret once and you have 6 heat rounds in your cheeks.
Patton is not easy as well, so this article doesn’t make any sense.

Berbo:   By definition, easy means that most of people will perform well driving these vehicles.  Now when we got this part of out of the way, there's your perception of what is difficult and easy when it comes to handling of these vehicles. What is easy for you may not be easy for your fellow tanker and vice versa, you may find hard to play Patton but that doesn't mean it's applicable to everyone.   Maus is indeed easy to play, you'll achieve more with MAUS than a lot of other tanks, same with Patton, 430 etc.   Cheers


Falathi
Przyszłość WOT.... A gdyby tak pluton mógł zasiąść w jednym czołgu?
arrow
18.05.2019 12:32:00
 
Subject: Przyszłość WOT.... A gdyby tak pluton mógł zasiąść w jednym czołgu?
Link on message: #16902900

Falathi: Była taka gra i okazało się to mało praktyczne: w teorii brzmi bardzo fajnie, ale w rzeczywistości dobranie załogi i podział ról są źródłem sporych problemów. Nadto, jeśli pojawią się problemy z synchronizacją o jakich wspomniał _Patrol to otrzymujemy więcej kłopotów, niż pożytku. Niestety. 


Zapfhan
Öffentlicher Test Version 1.5.1 - Anpassung der MPs: Leopard 1
arrow
18.05.2019 12:08:32
 
Subject: Öffentlicher Test Version 1.5.1 - Anpassung der MPs: Leopard 1
Link on message: #16902859

View PostCrusader2k13, on 17 May 2019 - 04:05 PM, said:     Update: Irgendwas stimmt auch mit dem Leo 1 nicht - der ist irgendwie, wie soll ich sagen - richtig abartig lahm, obwohl da "nur" die Traverse-Geschwindigkeit generft wurde (auf den drittschlechtesten Wert aller Xer Meds, btw...), aber er zieht auch nicht. Komisch. :amazed:  Gerade auf Ruinberg von STB-1, Progetto, Obj 430U und K-91 abgezogen worden, aber sowas von. Da sind irgendwelche Hidden-Stats angepasst worden, wohl die Bodenwiderstände, die WG so ungerne in der Garage anzeigen möchte.

Zapfhan:   Es wurden keinerlei Änderungen an "hidden stats" vorgenommen.    

View PostCrusader2k13, on 17 May 2019 - 06:57 PM, said: WG hat noch nie Stats aus einem CT heraus geändert, daher sind die aktuellen Parameter leider als gegeben und fertig anzunehmen.

R.I.P. Leo PTA

Zapfhan:   Uff   Beispiele aus der kürzeren Vergangenheit: Änderungen zwischen CT1 und CT2 1.5   Sweden UDES 16 Changed the load capacity of the stock suspension from 30,000 to 30,500 kg Emil I Increased thickness of the hull armoring (side armor was improved from 20 to 35 mm)
Japan Type 5 Heavy Changed the engine power from 1,200 to 1,370 h.p. O-I Changed the damage value of the HE Type 96 shell for the 15 cm Howitzer Type 96 gun from 910 to 890 Type 4 Heavy Changed the reload time of the 15 cm/45 41st Year Type gun from 24.5 to 22 s O-Ho Changed the reload time of the 15 cm Howitzer Type 96 gun from 17 to 22 s Changed the damage value of the HE Type 96 shell for the 15 cm Howitzer Type 96 gun from 910 to 890 O-Ni Changed the reload time of the 15 cm Howitzer Type 96 gun from 23 to 24 s Changed the damage value of the HE Type 96 shell for the 15 cm Howitzer Type 96 gun from 910 to 890     Änderungen zwischen CT1 und CT2 1.4   Panhard EBR 90 Changed the top and reverse speed from 70 to 65 km/h (Cruise mode) Changed the top and reverse speed from 90 to 85 km/h (Rapid mode) Changed the engine power of Panhard 12H 6000 mle.63 from 620 to 580 h.p. Changed the engine power of Panhard H-101 from 550 to 500 h.p. Panhard EBR 105 Changed the top and reverse speed from 75 to 70 km/h (Cruise mode) Changed the top speed from 105 to 95 km/h (Rapid mode) Changed the reverse speed from 75 to 70 km/h (Rapid mode) Changed the engine power from 820 to 750 h.p.  Panhard AML Lynx 6x6 Changed the reverse speed from 58 to 40 km/h (Cruise mode) Changed the top speed from 82 to 80 km/h (Rapid mode) Changed the reverse speed from 82 to 60 km/h (Rapid mode)  


Falathi
Aktualizacja 1.5.1 - Leopard 1
arrow
18.05.2019 12:03:06
 
Subject: Aktualizacja 1.5.1 - Leopard 1
Link on message: #16902839

View Postklosiu_1, on 17 May 2019 - 07:22 PM, said: Leopard jak Leopard. Odniosłem wrażenie, ze nic się nie zmieniło, może działo nieco mniej kalafiorów wali. Alfa niby większa, ale dpm mniej więcej bez zmian. I to są wszystkie zmiany w tym czołgu jakie zauważyłem, no ok, pena na standardowych pociskach poszła w górę, zawsze to zaleta. Ale w gameplayu różnic w zasadzie nie ma.

Falathi:   Cały koncept polega na tym, że Leopard został ulepszony, ale jak miał być snajperem, tak pozostaje snajperem więc różnicy w stylu rozgrywki bym się nie spodziewał.   


Berbo
The 2019 Season of Ranked Battles Is Here!
arrow
18.05.2019 04:53:26
 
Subject: The 2019 Season of Ranked Battles Is Here!
Link on message: #16902491

View PostSlyMeerkat, on 17 May 2019 - 05:25 PM, said:   Of course its nice but for me its just to try hard for my liking and not quite ready for it yet :)

Berbo:   I believe in you :), the entry point should be super easy and difficulty should increase over time but you'll also get better. In any case, I suggest you to at least try it.    And ofc, have a great weekend!


Zapfhan
Öffentlicher Test Version 1.5.1 - Anpassung der MPs: Leopard 1
arrow
17.05.2019 18:52:48
 
Subject: Öffentlicher Test Version 1.5.1 - Anpassung der MPs: Leopard 1
Link on message: #16901555

View PostGenova, on 17 May 2019 - 02:37 PM, said: Im changelog für den PTA steht nur, dass der traverse speed von 42 auf 40 gesenkt wurde.

Trotzdem ist die Beschleunigung gefühlt dramatisch schlechter gewurden.
 

Zapfhan:   Für den Leopard PTA steht in der Änderungsliste, dass die Leistung des top Motors von 830 auf 770 PS geändert wurde.    Die P/T ratio is aber noch immer angemessen für mittlere Panzer.    


Berbo
The 2019 Season of Ranked Battles Is Here!
arrow
17.05.2019 18:36:07
 
Subject: The 2019 Season of Ranked Battles Is Here!
Link on message: #16901503

View PostSharp1903, on 17 May 2019 - 03:32 PM, said: Can we do personal missions in Ranked Battles? 

Berbo:   Not possible,   Cheers 15:38 Added after 2 minutes

View PostSlyMeerkat, on 17 May 2019 - 04:00 PM, said: I shall give it a pass

Berbo:   I hoped for one nice :(


Kayi4ek
Veřejný test verze 1.5.1 - Všeobecná diskuse
arrow
17.05.2019 18:33:56
 
Subject: Veřejný test verze 1.5.1 - Všeobecná diskuse
Link on message: #16901494

View PostSir__Lynx, on 17 May 2019 - 09:33 AM, said: Bože svatá, kdo to před zveřejněním kontroluje?? Obsah - přepracování LEHKÝCH tanků?? To je tak neprofesionální...

Kayi4ek:   Ahoj,   děkuji za nahlášení. Chyba byla opravena! :honoring:


parim1331
Gear Up for the Frontlines and Save
arrow
17.05.2019 18:14:25
 
Subject: Gear Up for the Frontlines and Save
Link on message: #16901435

View PostCpt_VV, on 16 May 2019 - 01:43 PM, said: This is sad. Your portal lately became just one big fat newsletter for e-shop. Al those tanks, now this. No content about game itself, some updates, nothing, just one big sign ' give us your money'. Before you had some interesting articles to read at least once or twice per week. Just sad.

parim1331:   Don't worry, there are awesome articles incoming!


Jahrakajin
Ewiges Off-Topic, Kulinarisches WoT-Kompendium aka der höfliche und nette Geb...
arrow
17.05.2019 18:08:27
 
parim1331
Caernarvon Action X, the Unicorn Tank
arrow
17.05.2019 18:04:42
 
Subject: Caernarvon Action X, the Unicorn Tank
Link on message: #16901401

View PostZmago5000, on 17 May 2019 - 06:22 AM, said: is this tank OP in any way, worth buying?   And 100 eur bundles WTF,...when the hell did this game became  so expensive,...was it always this way?

parim1331:   Certainly not OP. It's a good situational tank that should be mostly used hull-down, personally I like it a lot.   

View PostSknr, on 17 May 2019 - 06:26 AM, said:  Why you didn't include Discuss on forum link at the bottom of your Previous article regarding medium tank rebalance? Afraid of critique much?

parim1331:   In which article exactly?  

View Postguest273, on 17 May 2019 - 07:29 AM, said: They're not even hiding the fact that it's OP, thus a "unicorn tank". Yet, there is something happy in me inside that the regular Caernarvon has better DPM than the premium one! :)

parim1331:   How is that tank OP?


parim1331
Special: Team Effort
arrow
17.05.2019 18:00:36
 
Subject: Special: Team Effort
Link on message: #16901385

View Postzmogustapke, on 17 May 2019 - 10:11 AM, said: Where have those x3 exp. weekends gone? 

parim1331:   We had couple of x5 specials lately, let's get some breather time first.


Falathi
Wyposaż się na Linię frontu, a przy tym oszczędzaj
arrow
17.05.2019 17:59:43
 
Subject: Wyposaż się na Linię frontu, a przy tym oszczędzaj
Link on message: #16901382

View Postmurmeniusz, on 16 May 2019 - 05:02 PM, said: Na prawdę ktoś to kupuje? :D

Falathi:   Zapewniam, że gdyby nikt nie kupował to byśmy nie wystawiali takich ofert. Jeśli nie ma chętnych to towar przestaje być oferowany. 


parim1331
The 2019 Season of Ranked Battles Is Here!
arrow
17.05.2019 17:58:10
 
Subject: The 2019 Season of Ranked Battles Is Here!
Link on message: #16901377

View PostJapualtah, on 17 May 2019 - 12:44 PM, said:   I do. Especially since Frontline is an unbearable grind, so I don't play it, and I have no progress to hope for whatsoever in the campaigns.

parim1331:   Glad that you like it. :)  

View PostTheNightFox, on 17 May 2019 - 01:03 PM, said: At last, NEWS! Thanks, I was looking forward to this.

parim1331:   We couldn't leave you hanging!  

View PostMav75, on 17 May 2019 - 03:29 PM, said: Ah, the Golden Shower season starts!   Will be missing part of it, if I were to play it, for being in hospital for surgery.

parim1331:   Get well soon, we're looking forward to see you back on your feet, and on the battlefield as soon as possible! :izmena:


Реклама | Adv