Developers posts on forum

Tanitha: Thanks for the report.
/Tan

Tanitha: Hello Testers,
Thank you again for your valued bug reports for the 7.5 Public Test.
The time is upon us to start summarizing and gathering your feedback to send directly to the development team.
As such, when your reports have been compiled and sent to the developers, we'll be transferring your threads to the Public Test Archive section.
http://forum.worldof...c-test-archive/
If it's in the Public Test Archive section, rest assured that your feedback has been heard.
If you have any new or further information on a topic which has previously been archived, please feel free to open a new thread. That being said, please make sure to check the Public Test Archive section before posting a new thread to see if the issue has already been recorded.
Thank you tankers!

Tanitha: Hello Testers,
Thank you again for your valued bug reports for the 7.5 Public Test.
The time is upon us to start summarizing and gathering your feedback to send directly to the development team.
As such, when your reports have been compiled and sent to the developers, we'll be transferring your threads to the Public Test Archive section.
http://forum.worldof...c-test-archive/
If it's in the Public Test Archive section, rest assured that your feedback has been heard.
If you have any new or further information on a topic which has previously been archived, please feel free to open a new thread. That being said, please make sure to check the Public Test Archive section before posting a new thread to see if the issue has already been recorded.
Thank you tankers!

Tanitha: Please continue discussing this in the designated threads.
Thanks /Tan

Tanitha: Thats why we put Rations, Coke, and Chocolate into the game for you...
But seriously, glad you are having fun..!
Regards
Tan.

GeneralDirection: I don't see anyone saying that--especially not if you've spent time on the public test.

GeneralDirection: There is no tier-based bonus to credit earnings. It's a flat rate depending on the amount of damage dealt to a target.

Tanitha: Moved your thread to the public test section, it will make it a lot easier to gather your feedback there.

Mugsy_: No problem, sent you a message to get more details. ~Mugsy_

Gaea: Fixed!

Gaea:

Fixed!

Gaea:

Fixed!

GeneralDirection: The next NA event includes 2x crew experience.

GeneralDirection: For what it's worth, it's only been two months since the last equipment sale.

Gaea: Check the news here!

Gaea: Check the news here!

Gaea: Check the news here!

lord_farquad: "All tanks" in "World of Tanks" does in fact mean everything at tier 8

lord_farquad: "All tanks" in "World of Tanks" does in fact mean everything at tier 8

lord_farquad: We do seed larger tournaments, unfortunately that's a LOT of work for a week long tournament, and would likely mean that the Skirmishes would no longer occur weekly. So I doubt we'll be seeding the Skirmishes anytime soon.
If you want seeded tournaments I suggest you keep your eyes peeled for future league events, as the playoffs of those will likely always be seeded (similar to how the Classic was).
I hope that helps.

lord_farquad:
We do seed larger tournaments, unfortunately that's a LOT of work for a week long tournament, and would likely mean that the Skirmishes would no longer occur weekly. So I doubt we'll be seeding the Skirmishes anytime soon.

If you want seeded tournaments I suggest you keep your eyes peeled for future league events, as the playoffs of those will likely always be seeded (similar to how the Classic was).

I hope that helps.

lord_farquad: 3, as stated in the registration.
By the way, I have received a lot of awesome notes the past few weeks of people telling me how much they enjoy the tourneys. Thanks to everyone who sent one, it's always nice to hear!

lord_farquad:
3, as stated in the registration.

By the way, I have received a lot of awesome notes the past few weeks of people telling me how much they enjoy the tourneys. Thanks to everyone who sent one, it's always nice to hear!

Tanitha: These two are valid reason.
Regards
Tan.

Tanitha:

Vallter: It will probably be better than on E50

Vallter: No, they do not receive a nerf, since they also will have a more tight MM. So they will see weaker enemies.

Vallter: According to statistics, transmission have not influenced to much the E-50. Later, once we gather statistics, we will probably rethink it a bit. Since E-50 won't be a Top Tier any more it should earn as Tier 9 HT.

Vallter: 1) In-game we have such characteristics as view range, HP and other, which, logically, do not correcpond to history -) We can and will tune them to balance the T10 vehicles.
2)It's a T-62A (a prototype), which was designed earlier than 1960

Vallter: We've made a hotfix and are currently testing it. If everything goes well, we will release it server-wide.

Vallter: Yes, they should never reduce MM value!! Damn Developers!

Vallter: Well, it's a high end tank and it's profitability can be rethought only after adding LT's of higher Tiers.

Vallter: End of July or first half of August. Everything depends on test and quality of feedback.

Vallter: It also won't see anything above Tier 4-5 in battles normally. You are welcome

Vallter: Read the full update note in the 7.5 Test thread. Here we reviewed only some changes.

Vallter: Well, you do not have to pay for the game, that's why. But we have different options. Please, contact our Customer Support for further details.

Vallter: Have you heard about the reduced MM?

Vallter: See above stated for Marder II comment.
Well, we could release unbalance and underpowered line in Q1-2 2012, as promised, postpone physics even more, do not release Game Modes etc. But you would receive more tanks! Still, we decided to please the majority of our community first.

Vallter: The tanks you've mentioned later in your post receive reduced MM.

Vallter: 1)Because Tier 9 mediums were designed to struggle against Tier 10 vehicles. And If we would only improve their characteristics on Tier 10 Mediums, we would receive mutants. If Tier 10 would be same to Tier 9, there would be no sence in going further.
2)Because it was underperforming and have not received so many buffs as other ones.

Vallter: You are welcome. Please, bext time also read the full update notes, specailly the part about reduced MM -)

Vallter: 1)We love seing people playing in our product. It's really pleasant.
2)It's a common mistake made by many MMO titles in the past. We don't want to repeat them.

Vallter: All vehicles mentioned will be still fun to play.

Vallter: Hit points, view range... What could be more accurate historically? Probably only E-series.

Vallter: They will receieve a more soft MM in 7.5 along with other vehicles.

Vallter: Wow! And where are good old \Russian bias' comments?

Vallter: I try to answer all questions disregarding their reputation. Sometimes I can just miss some because of their quantity.
There is no need to own them and have in garage. At least, it's the current work sheme. We will notify you later in news articles, if something changes.

Vallter: [quote name='Lord_Lemming' timestamp='1342107888' post='2236630']
Hello Vallter;

I have been wondering about the forward placement of the combat compartment and turret on the new E50 ausf M; will that affect gun depression?

Best regards
/Kenneth
[/quote]

It will probably be better than on E50

[quote name='armoredteapot' timestamp='1342111933' post='2237254']
I'm sorry if i don't understand it correctly but...

Are they going to hit the t34-85 and the t-43 with a terrible nerf? What are they replacing the 100mm with? The t34-85 "might" be ok with the loss of the 100mm, but for the t-43? that would be bad! I mean, the 100mm was barely adequate for the fights the t-43 got if I remember correctly. (good thing i got the t-44 before this hit)

Except for that part, this seems like a good patch. I hope the testers try and see if the t34-85 and t43 will be extra horrible on the test servers.
[/quote]

No, they do not receive a nerf, since they also will have a more tight MM. So they will see weaker enemies.

[quote name='Tuoweit' timestamp='1342112520' post='2237364']
Vallter, will there be a reduction in the repair costs of the E-50?  Two patches ago the overall profitability of the E-50 was improved, and then in the last patch when the new transmission was added the full repair costs of the E-50 went up by ~2000 credits, effectively wiping out the previous adjustment.  Possibly the E-75 is in the same situation (I don't have one, I can't say).
[/quote]

According to statistics, transmission have not influenced to much the E-50. Later, once we gather statistics, we will probably rethink it a bit. Since E-50 won't be a Top Tier any more it should earn as Tier 9 HT.

[quote name='upinarms' timestamp='1342112733' post='2237408']
well considering the m48a1 is a design from 1951 (production started in 1952) and the t62 was developed in 1961 (production started in 1962?) id say 2 things are proven;
1. this game is completely biased towards the soviet tanks (as a side note, just about every tank is portrayed as better than any american at equal tier level, which in reality is just not true)
2. the devs lied when they claimed that they would only use tanks from before 1960.

given this, they could fix it by making the m46 a t8 premium, make the m48 a t9 medium, and give us the m60 (also developed in 1961).
[/quote]

1) In-game we have such characteristics as view range, HP and other, which, logically, do not correcpond to history -) We can and will tune them to balance the T10 vehicles.
2)It's a T-62A (a prototype), which was designed earlier than 1960

[quote name='sictemp' timestamp='1342112859' post='2237424']
Why do we have to wait for this update to go live before the fix for the Crash To Desktop is installed??????
[/quote]

We've made a hotfix and are currently testing it. If everything goes well, we will release it server-wide.

[quote name='zachdogg' timestamp='1342114470' post='2237719']
when this update cames out WOT will be worse than ever \
thank a lot WOT Game designers
[/quote]

Yes, they should never reduce MM value!! Damn Developers!

[quote name='Ceaddil' timestamp='1342114577' post='2237738']
Glad to hear the profitability changes but wondering why the VK2801 was not adjusted at all... it seems to cost me money to run this tank if the game ends in a defeat. Not saying I want it to be a cash cow but it should at least break even if you have a bad match.
[/quote]

Well, it's a high end tank and it's profitability can be rethought only after adding LT's of higher Tiers.

[quote name='paradat' timestamp='1342114883' post='2237791']
So what is best guess for release?
[/quote]

End of July or first half of August. Everything depends on test and quality of feedback.

[quote name='ApathyCurve' timestamp='1342115550' post='2237895']
"Marder II: - slight reduction of all gun characteristics"
Allow me to translate:  they took the only really fun TD in the game and transformed it into a turnip like all the rest of them.  Thanks, WG!   T
[/quote]

It also won't see anything above Tier 4-5 in battles normally. You are welcome

[quote name='Zulu__Dawn' timestamp='1342117010' post='2238161']
NO SUPER PERSHING???

Wow I really wanted that one.
[/quote]

Read the full update note in the 7.5 Test thread. Here we reviewed only some changes.

[quote name='chubjosh' timestamp='1342119016' post='2238517']
This game needs an unsubscribe button.
[/quote]

Well, you do not have to pay for the game, that's why. But we have different options. Please, contact our Customer Support for further details.

[quote name='Lt_Bash' timestamp='1342119483' post='2238604']
WTF! wargaming?! Why did you take out the F30 85mm? It was awesome in the t28 and made the tank some what tolerable. I don't care if people act little cry babies just becase they got 85mm'ed by a T-28. It must have been them that whined you remove this. Thanks alot for screwing me over.
[/quote]

Have you heard about the reduced MM?

[quote name='Sword_of_Light' timestamp='1342121929' post='2239006']
Wait.  Who said more German tanks are coming?  You mean the German TDs we were supposed to see back in November?  Let me give a small bit of WG history to those who haven't been around for all of their hijinks - the reason WG stopped telling us specific release dates was that they couldn't hit them, and by "couldn't" I mean, by weeks or even months.  Rather than opt for honesty and transparency, they went for vague.

Congratulations, WG, you've managed to make me feel ripped off for a game I haven't actually purchased.  Heres a hint why thats bad:  I'm not ever going to either.  I may not even be playing after the next patch - I've had my Marder for more than a year now, and you're replacing it with junk?  I was wondering how long it would take you to reach the final insult.  Maybe its a good patch, maybe it isnt, I've been wrong in the past about patches - but my bet is that its going to be uninstall time soon.
-Don
[/quote]

See above stated for Marder II comment.

Well, we could release unbalance and underpowered line in Q1-2 2012, as promised, postpone physics even more, do not release Game Modes etc. But you would receive more tanks! Still, we decided to please the majority of our community first.

[quote name='wolan82' timestamp='1342132867' post='2240521']
OK so I will start by saying WTF ....

[/quote]

The tanks you've mentioned later in your post receive reduced MM.

[quote name='Rufi000000' timestamp='1342134119' post='2240716']
I don't really understand why the tier 9 mediums need any changes if they're staying in the same place. Why can't the tier 10s just be better outright? Who wants tier 10 mediums that are the same as the tier 9s were and tier 9s that aren't quite as good as they used to be?

On top of this, I don't see why the T-54 is not getting nerfed like its American and German counterparts. Is nerfing the E-50s gun supposed to justify getting the same gun at tier 10? Will the only improvement upon moving to the tier 10 be you get the ROF and aim time it previously had? That's how I read it and it seems ridiculous.
[/quote]

1)Because Tier 9 mediums were designed to struggle against Tier 10 vehicles. And If we would only improve their characteristics on Tier 10 Mediums, we would receive mutants. If Tier 10 would be same to Tier 9, there would be no sence in going further.
2)Because it was underperforming and have not received so many buffs as other ones.

[quote name='Dogsoldier6' timestamp='1342134121' post='2240719']
Ok so my SU-85 is losing its 107mm Gun and I am getting a what? An 85mm upgraded gun? Load the Tennis balls boys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for listening to this old fart rant, LOL
[/quote]

You are welcome. Please, bext time also read the full update notes, specailly the part about reduced MM -)

[quote name='PhantomDragoon' timestamp='1342134492' post='2240786']
I am beginning to wonder about point #1.  Do you really appreciate time players spend on your game or is there something else you appreciate more.

Point #2:  WTF?  If the game is becoming so popular, there will always be people playing the lower Tiers.
[/quote]

1)We love seing people playing in our product. It's really pleasant.
2)It's a common mistake made by many MMO titles in the past. We don't want to repeat them.

[quote name='slenderfungus' timestamp='1342137541' post='2241179']
So, let me get this straight.  You don't want the middle tiers to die out so the idea is to nerf them and reduce the credit earnings to push players to play them?

I just started playing the SU-85, Marder II and T49, but all three are getting hit some form of nerf of credit earning reduction.  I see this as pushing me out of playing those rather than pushing me to play them.  After the last credit nerf to the M4A3E8 I sold that one as well and now you are hitting it again?  Any thought of repurchasing that tank has just been removed from ever being considered again for me.
[/quote]

All vehicles mentioned will be still fun to play.

[quote name='PhantomDragoon' timestamp='1342140010' post='2241469']
Then they are going against the historical accuracy of the vehicles.  If the vehicles were superior, then why make them less so.  So that some 14 year old whiny bitch can have a lesser tank kill it?  BS.   If people do their research and know what choices to make to get a good tank; good on them.  Let them earn the extra creds.  If people are not bright enough or too lazy to research, then they deserve to not make those creds.
[/quote]

Hit points, view range... What could be more accurate historically? Probably only E-series.

[quote name='GearaDoga' timestamp='1342150505' post='2242618']
...If you guys are going ahead with buffs to that pre-order tank, is there any hope for my poor Pz V/IV maybe getting something done to make it slightly less pointless and horrible??  

It's a lovely tank, but completely combat ineffective.  Even getting something like the Churchill's softer matchmaking would help immensely...  Please??
[/quote]

They will receieve a more soft MM in 7.5 along with other vehicles.

[quote name='EvilChris' timestamp='1342190061' post='2245075']
read my above post, they are killing the russian tanks, now we have no good russian tanks in tier 6 and below
[/quote]

Wow! And where are good old \Russian bias' comments?

[quote name='Praetor77' timestamp='1342191353' post='2245194']
Every question got answered but mine, can someone repost it pls, or give me some pluses, since maybe Valter is not seeing it since I have negative rep for telling people to stop whining about nerfs on another thread...

Question is:

What I am wondering about is if the Free XP compensation for the F3 gun on T28 and 107mm on Su-85 only happen if you have the tanks in garage and equipped with those guns...?
[/quote]

I try to answer all questions disregarding their reputation. Sometimes I can just miss some because of their quantity.

There is no need to own them and have in garage. At least, it's the current work sheme. We will notify you later in news articles, if something changes.

Vallter: [quote name='Lord_Lemming' timestamp='1342107888' post='2236630']
Hello Vallter;

I have been wondering about the forward placement of the combat compartment and turret on the new E50 ausf M; will that affect gun depression?

Best regards
/Kenneth
[/quote]

It will probably be better than on E50

[quote name='armoredteapot' timestamp='1342111933' post='2237254']
I'm sorry if i don't understand it correctly but...

Are they going to hit the t34-85 and the t-43 with a terrible nerf? What are they replacing the 100mm with? The t34-85 "might" be ok with the loss of the 100mm, but for the t-43? that would be bad! I mean, the 100mm was barely adequate for the fights the t-43 got if I remember correctly. (good thing i got the t-44 before this hit)

Except for that part, this seems like a good patch. I hope the testers try and see if the t34-85 and t43 will be extra horrible on the test servers.
[/quote]

No, they do not receive a nerf, since they also will have a more tight MM. So they will see weaker enemies.

[quote name='Tuoweit' timestamp='1342112520' post='2237364']
Vallter, will there be a reduction in the repair costs of the E-50?  Two patches ago the overall profitability of the E-50 was improved, and then in the last patch when the new transmission was added the full repair costs of the E-50 went up by ~2000 credits, effectively wiping out the previous adjustment.  Possibly the E-75 is in the same situation (I don't have one, I can't say).
[/quote]

According to statistics, transmission have not influenced to much the E-50. Later, once we gather statistics, we will probably rethink it a bit. Since E-50 won't be a Top Tier any more it should earn as Tier 9 HT.

[quote name='upinarms' timestamp='1342112733' post='2237408']
well considering the m48a1 is a design from 1951 (production started in 1952) and the t62 was developed in 1961 (production started in 1962?) id say 2 things are proven;
1. this game is completely biased towards the soviet tanks (as a side note, just about every tank is portrayed as better than any american at equal tier level, which in reality is just not true)
2. the devs lied when they claimed that they would only use tanks from before 1960.

given this, they could fix it by making the m46 a t8 premium, make the m48 a t9 medium, and give us the m60 (also developed in 1961).
[/quote]

1) In-game we have such characteristics as view range, HP and other, which, logically, do not correcpond to history -) We can and will tune them to balance the T10 vehicles.
2)It's a T-62A (a prototype), which was designed earlier than 1960

[quote name='sictemp' timestamp='1342112859' post='2237424']
Why do we have to wait for this update to go live before the fix for the Crash To Desktop is installed??????
[/quote]

We've made a hotfix and are currently testing it. If everything goes well, we will release it server-wide.

[quote name='zachdogg' timestamp='1342114470' post='2237719']
when this update cames out WOT will be worse than ever \
thank a lot WOT Game designers
[/quote]

Yes, they should never reduce MM value!! Damn Developers!

[quote name='Ceaddil' timestamp='1342114577' post='2237738']
Glad to hear the profitability changes but wondering why the VK2801 was not adjusted at all... it seems to cost me money to run this tank if the game ends in a defeat. Not saying I want it to be a cash cow but it should at least break even if you have a bad match.
[/quote]

Well, it's a high end tank and it's profitability can be rethought only after adding LT's of higher Tiers.

[quote name='paradat' timestamp='1342114883' post='2237791']
So what is best guess for release?
[/quote]

End of July or first half of August. Everything depends on test and quality of feedback.

[quote name='ApathyCurve' timestamp='1342115550' post='2237895']
"Marder II: - slight reduction of all gun characteristics"
Allow me to translate:  they took the only really fun TD in the game and transformed it into a turnip like all the rest of them.  Thanks, WG!   T
[/quote]

It also won't see anything above Tier 4-5 in battles normally. You are welcome

[quote name='Zulu__Dawn' timestamp='1342117010' post='2238161']
NO SUPER PERSHING???

Wow I really wanted that one.
[/quote]

Read the full update note in the 7.5 Test thread. Here we reviewed only some changes.

[quote name='chubjosh' timestamp='1342119016' post='2238517']
This game needs an unsubscribe button.
[/quote]

Well, you do not have to pay for the game, that's why. But we have different options. Please, contact our Customer Support for further details.

[quote name='Lt_Bash' timestamp='1342119483' post='2238604']
WTF! wargaming?! Why did you take out the F30 85mm? It was awesome in the t28 and made the tank some what tolerable. I don't care if people act little cry babies just becase they got 85mm'ed by a T-28. It must have been them that whined you remove this. Thanks alot for screwing me over.
[/quote]

Have you heard about the reduced MM?

[quote name='Sword_of_Light' timestamp='1342121929' post='2239006']
Wait.  Who said more German tanks are coming?  You mean the German TDs we were supposed to see back in November?  Let me give a small bit of WG history to those who haven't been around for all of their hijinks - the reason WG stopped telling us specific release dates was that they couldn't hit them, and by "couldn't" I mean, by weeks or even months.  Rather than opt for honesty and transparency, they went for vague.

Congratulations, WG, you've managed to make me feel ripped off for a game I haven't actually purchased.  Heres a hint why thats bad:  I'm not ever going to either.  I may not even be playing after the next patch - I've had my Marder for more than a year now, and you're replacing it with junk?  I was wondering how long it would take you to reach the final insult.  Maybe its a good patch, maybe it isnt, I've been wrong in the past about patches - but my bet is that its going to be uninstall time soon.
-Don
[/quote]

See above stated for Marder II comment.

Well, we could release unbalance and underpowered line in Q1-2 2012, as promised, postpone physics even more, do not release Game Modes etc. But you would receive more tanks! Still, we decided to please the majority of our community first.

[quote name='wolan82' timestamp='1342132867' post='2240521']
OK so I will start by saying WTF ....

[/quote]

The tanks you've mentioned later in your post receive reduced MM.

[quote name='Rufi000000' timestamp='1342134119' post='2240716']
I don't really understand why the tier 9 mediums need any changes if they're staying in the same place. Why can't the tier 10s just be better outright? Who wants tier 10 mediums that are the same as the tier 9s were and tier 9s that aren't quite as good as they used to be?

On top of this, I don't see why the T-54 is not getting nerfed like its American and German counterparts. Is nerfing the E-50s gun supposed to justify getting the same gun at tier 10? Will the only improvement upon moving to the tier 10 be you get the ROF and aim time it previously had? That's how I read it and it seems ridiculous.
[/quote]

1)Because Tier 9 mediums were designed to struggle against Tier 10 vehicles. And If we would only improve their characteristics on Tier 10 Mediums, we would receive mutants. If Tier 10 would be same to Tier 9, there would be no sence in going further.
2)Because it was underperforming and have not received so many buffs as other ones.

[quote name='Dogsoldier6' timestamp='1342134121' post='2240719']
Ok so my SU-85 is losing its 107mm Gun and I am getting a what? An 85mm upgraded gun? Load the Tennis balls boys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for listening to this old fart rant, LOL
[/quote]

You are welcome. Please, bext time also read the full update notes, specailly the part about reduced MM -)

[quote name='PhantomDragoon' timestamp='1342134492' post='2240786']
I am beginning to wonder about point #1.  Do you really appreciate time players spend on your game or is there something else you appreciate more.

Point #2:  WTF?  If the game is becoming so popular, there will always be people playing the lower Tiers.
[/quote]

1)We love seing people playing in our product. It's really pleasant.
2)It's a common mistake made by many MMO titles in the past. We don't want to repeat them.

[quote name='slenderfungus' timestamp='1342137541' post='2241179']
So, let me get this straight.  You don't want the middle tiers to die out so the idea is to nerf them and reduce the credit earnings to push players to play them?

I just started playing the SU-85, Marder II and T49, but all three are getting hit some form of nerf of credit earning reduction.  I see this as pushing me out of playing those rather than pushing me to play them.  After the last credit nerf to the M4A3E8 I sold that one as well and now you are hitting it again?  Any thought of repurchasing that tank has just been removed from ever being considered again for me.
[/quote]

All vehicles mentioned will be still fun to play.

[quote name='PhantomDragoon' timestamp='1342140010' post='2241469']
Then they are going against the historical accuracy of the vehicles.  If the vehicles were superior, then why make them less so.  So that some 14 year old whiny bitch can have a lesser tank kill it?  BS.   If people do their research and know what choices to make to get a good tank; good on them.  Let them earn the extra creds.  If people are not bright enough or too lazy to research, then they deserve to not make those creds.
[/quote]

Hit points, view range... What could be more accurate historically? Probably only E-series.

[quote name='GearaDoga' timestamp='1342150505' post='2242618']
...If you guys are going ahead with buffs to that pre-order tank, is there any hope for my poor Pz V/IV maybe getting something done to make it slightly less pointless and horrible??  

It's a lovely tank, but completely combat ineffective.  Even getting something like the Churchill's softer matchmaking would help immensely...  Please??
[/quote]

They will receieve a more soft MM in 7.5 along with other vehicles.

[quote name='EvilChris' timestamp='1342190061' post='2245075']
read my above post, they are killing the russian tanks, now we have no good russian tanks in tier 6 and below
[/quote]

Wow! And where are good old \Russian bias' comments?

[quote name='Praetor77' timestamp='1342191353' post='2245194']
Every question got answered but mine, can someone repost it pls, or give me some pluses, since maybe Valter is not seeing it since I have negative rep for telling people to stop whining about nerfs on another thread...

Question is:

What I am wondering about is if the Free XP compensation for the F3 gun on T28 and 107mm on Su-85 only happen if you have the tanks in garage and equipped with those guns...?
[/quote]

I try to answer all questions disregarding their reputation. Sometimes I can just miss some because of their quantity.

There is no need to own them and have in garage. At least, it's the current work sheme. We will notify you later in news articles, if something changes.

Tanitha: While we do not normally pin player threads, I'll pin this thread for a while so it doesn't get lost again.

Tanitha: Thanks for the feedback

Tanitha: Thanks, and feel free to re-report any issues which still need changing each patch, and then i can follow them up each patch.
Regards
Tan.

Tanitha: Closed at op's request.

Tanitha: Thanks Montykoro

Tanitha: Tickets are not accepted for the test server, this is the place for bug reporting and any help which is available.
Regards
Tan.

Tanitha: As above, its the system used when new tanks are added, to ensure players aren't inconvenienced by the new tanks which are added.
Regards
Tan

Tanitha: As above, due to the exp values it will happen on the test server.
Thanks for the report.
/Tan

Tanitha: http://forum.worldof...anges-feedback/
Please use the matchmaker thread provided.
Closing /Tan

Tanitha: Hello 'jessekidman.
You should have also noticed when you logged in, that is said please contact billing support.
You can find them here. support.worldoftanks.com
Good luck with getting your issues fixed, and see you back in game when its sorted.
Please also take the time to read the game and forums rules, Profanity isn't accepted within the forums
Closing thread
/Tan

Tanitha: Thanks.
Will get this sent off to development.
Looks like a hot and fun map, I'm looking forward to having a few games in it.
Tan.

Tanitha: Discussion of the 7.5 public test should be here. http://forum.worldof...75-public-test/
Feel free to provide constructive feedback on the changes with a relevant topic title, in that section.
Thread closed and moved.
Regards
Tan.

Tanitha: This section is for the reporting of bugs, not rule violations.
Closing /Tan

Tanitha: Thanks.
Pinned the thread.