Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
GeneralDirection
Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
arrow
14.12.2012 04:27:09
 
Subject: Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
Link on message: #3249596

View Postminerguy1, on Dec 14 2012 - 03:25, said: Game design reason's? Such as? Please answer I'm curious DX


GeneralDirection:
Effects on progression. There are bonuses for lower tier tanks because those are designed to be the primary money makers for standard vehicles.


GeneralDirection
Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
arrow
14.12.2012 04:27:09
 
Subject: Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
Link on message: #3249596

View Postminerguy1, on Dec 14 2012 - 03:25, said: Game design reason's? Such as? Please answer I'm curious DX


GeneralDirection:
Effects on progression. There are bonuses for lower tier tanks because those are designed to be the primary money makers for standard vehicles.


GeneralDirection
Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
arrow
14.12.2012 04:22:21
 
Subject: Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
Link on message: #3249558

View PostStriker9500, on Dec 14 2012 - 01:10, said: This is the kind of special i've been waiting for, well done WG.  50% crew xp for all tanks is awesome! Wish it could be extended to the New Year? Haha,right...thanks WG!


GeneralDirection:
50% crew xp is pretty paltry for a Winter Celebration. I think you'll like what we've chosen more.


View PostArrowfoot, on Dec 14 2012 - 01:19, said: Why is it that the tank made famus by this battle and most closly linked to it is left out? No tank is more closly linked with this batter then the King Tiger and yet the Russains leave it out of the bounus. The panther i could kind of understand but the Jagdpanzer 4 get real. Yes the bounuses are nice for the weekend but just another case of how badly the Russains hate the Germans and how they work to keep them below all others in this game.


GeneralDirection:
First of all, I'm not Russian. Secondly, we do not include tier 8+ in credit bonus events for game design reasons.


GeneralDirection
Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
arrow
14.12.2012 04:22:21
 
Subject: Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
Link on message: #3249558

View PostStriker9500, on Dec 14 2012 - 01:10, said: This is the kind of special i've been waiting for, well done WG.  50% crew xp for all tanks is awesome! Wish it could be extended to the New Year? Haha,right...thanks WG!


GeneralDirection:
50% crew xp is pretty paltry for a Winter Celebration. I think you'll like what we've chosen more.


View PostArrowfoot, on Dec 14 2012 - 01:19, said: Why is it that the tank made famus by this battle and most closly linked to it is left out? No tank is more closly linked with this batter then the King Tiger and yet the Russains leave it out of the bounus. The panther i could kind of understand but the Jagdpanzer 4 get real. Yes the bounuses are nice for the weekend but just another case of how badly the Russains hate the Germans and how they work to keep them below all others in this game.


GeneralDirection:
First of all, I'm not Russian. Secondly, we do not include tier 8+ in credit bonus events for game design reasons.


GeneralDirection
Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
arrow
14.12.2012 04:19:47
 
Subject: Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
Link on message: #3249541

View PostExponan, on Dec 14 2012 - 00:39, said: I saw M4A3E2 Sherman Ju and thought there was a new Sherman but then I realized it was just cut off  :Smile_sad:


GeneralDirection:
That's really weird. We'll report this to the web dev team; it looks fine in the editor (and the html checks out too).


GeneralDirection
Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
arrow
14.12.2012 04:19:47
 
Subject: Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
Link on message: #3249541

View PostExponan, on Dec 14 2012 - 00:39, said: I saw M4A3E2 Sherman Ju and thought there was a new Sherman but then I realized it was just cut off  :Smile_sad:


GeneralDirection:
That's really weird. We'll report this to the web dev team; it looks fine in the editor (and the html checks out too).


Mugsy_
Simple changes to Ruinberg to make it more interesting and dynamic
arrow
14.12.2012 04:01:17
 
Subject: Simple changes to Ruinberg to make it more interesting and dynamic
Link on message: #3249414

Mugsy_: Hey, super cool suggestion, I really appreciate the visuals. Will definitely pass onward and upwards. Thank you!


dance210
Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
arrow
14.12.2012 03:21:56
 
Subject: Weekend Event: Battle of the Bulge
Link on message: #3249164

View PostDrug_Dejan, on Dec 14 2012 - 03:16, said: Still no 50% discount on purchase price of vehicles. Whoever instituted this change needs to have their head examined.
+50% crew bonus is nice and I understand the idea behind credit income increase but 50% discounts need to return and fast!

dance210: Um, not sure what you are talking about, but the following vehicles have 50% credit discount...
50% Credit Discount for the Following Vehicles:
• M4A3E2 Sherman Jumbo
• M4A3E8 Sherman
• JagdPz IV
• PzKpfw V Panther


Mugsy_
The "vent your anger about 8.2" thread!
arrow
14.12.2012 03:14:03
 
Subject: The "vent your anger about 8.2" thread!
Link on message: #3249112

View PostBiggsull, on Dec 14 2012 - 00:29, said: We were promised something to do with arty would be nerfed to impact the number in games. We were lied to.

Mugsy_: You were told a change was coming. But not that it would be part of 8.2.

View Postkingmenes, on Dec 14 2012 - 00:05, said: Even though 8.2 has been up just a few hours, I decided to make this thread here, to prevent the "OMG 8.2 SUXXS" threads from clogging up the forum. If you had an experience after 8.2, like "UGH the new American tanks SUCK" or "why did WG do this?" or "this happened to me recently", instead of posting a new thread on it, just vent your anger here.

Mugsy_: On the contrary, I encourage people to find the official feedback threads relevant to the issues they have input on and leave constructive, specific feedback on how you feel. This behavior would be beneficial to the community and the development of the game.


Mugsy_
8.2 Official Feedback Threads List
arrow
14.12.2012 02:54:54
 
Subject: 8.2 Official Feedback Threads List
Link on message: #3248977

View Postisaacalmeida, on Dec 14 2012 - 01:40, said: for starters,there was absolutely no need to add those damn bumps near the island,the slow you down when you need to get to the hill from the north side,that gice the south a huge advantage,to fix the porblem,remove the bumps or add similar obstacles to the south side

Mugsy_: Thanks for your input. noted, sir.


Mugsy_
8.2 Official Feedback Threads List
arrow
14.12.2012 02:30:16
 
Subject: 8.2 Official Feedback Threads List
Link on message: #3248785

View Postkapsiolaaaa, on Dec 14 2012 - 01:24, said: 8.2 is the most horrible release ever.. seriously you did that to prokhorovka?

Mugsy_: Please be specific and constructive. What changes were problematic for you? What is it you don't like about Prok now?


Jewel_Thief
#84 - Newsletter
arrow
13.12.2012 23:16:02
 
Subject: #84 - Newsletter
Link on message: #3246944

Jewel_Thief: Congrats to the winners of the last Newsletter contest! And good luck to everyone for this one!

~JT


Mugsy_
I'm a lumber jack and thats ok...(Monty Python song)
arrow
13.12.2012 23:02:02
 
Subject: I'm a lumber jack and thats ok...(Monty Python song)
Link on message: #3246825

Mugsy_: There was discussion at one point about a lumberjack award but we try not to reward behavior which could be detrimental to the actual battle.
You wouldn't want to see half your team head off into the forest to knock down trees instead of facing your enemies.


Mugsy_
What happened to the 8.2 Arty fix?
arrow
13.12.2012 22:58:55
 
Subject: What happened to the 8.2 Arty fix?
Link on message: #3246804

View PostUnderdarkhunter, on Dec 13 2012 - 21:55, said: There was a blurb about an announcement coming shortly.  Nothing about it being in 8.2.  Just that there was something in the works dealing with arty, no nerfs blah blah blah.  It said the details would be released soon, not in this patch.

Mugsy_: He is correct.


Mugsy_
8.2 Official Feedback Threads List
arrow
13.12.2012 22:57:42
 
Subject: 8.2 Official Feedback Threads List
Link on message: #3246795

Mugsy_: Hello everyone, thank you for your feedback thus far, please if you are having technical issues I implore you to submit a ticket at support.worldoftanks.com


Mugsy_
Official Vehicle Rebalancing & Changes Feedback Thread
arrow
13.12.2012 22:54:02
 
Subject: Official Vehicle Rebalancing & Changes Feedback Thread
Link on message: #3246756

Mugsy_: Hello Tankers,
Please take a moment to share your constructive feedback on the following changes:

General Changes
                    
Fixed small error in armoring (mainly observation devices and settings of TDs and SPGs open turrets/hulls) of the following vehicles:
France: AMX 38, AMX 40, ARL 44, D1, Hotchkiss H35, RenaultFT, Lorraine 39 L AM, Lorraine 40t, AMX 13F3AM, AMX 105AM,
AMX 13-75
Germany: PzKpfw B2 740 (f), E-100, PzKpfw 38H735 (f), Löwe, Leichttraktor, Panther-M10, PzKpfw 38 nA, PzKpfw 38 (t), PzKpfw III/IV, PzKpfw V-IV, PzKpfw VI Tiger, T-15б T-25, VK 1602 Leopard, VK 2801, VK 3001 (H), VK 3001 (P),
VK 3002 (DB), VK 3601 (H), Wespe, Gw Panther, Grille
USA: M18 Hellcat, M36 Jackson, M46 Patton, M48A1 Patton, M5 Stuart, M6A2E1, M26 Pershing, Ram II, M4A3E2, T25/2, T49, T92
USSR:  А-32, М3 Light, IS-6, SU-85I, Т-50-2, Т-34-85, Tetrarch, Object 212, Object 704, S-51
The following tanks have been moved to a 16 group armor system: PzKpfw 35 (t), PzKpfw II, PzKpfw III Ausf. A
Renamed the M36 Slugger to M36 Jackson.
Renamed the Churchill premium tank to Churchill III.
Reduced the research cost of the 2x Leyland E164 engine for Matilda tank to 310 experience points.
Increased the research cost of the Churchill tank after the Matilda tank to 11,500 experience points.
The Lowe has been rescaled according to historical references: height increased by 21cm and gun barrel length increased by 10cm.
Load capacity of FV221A suspension of Caernarvon tank changed from 62,000kg to 63,000kg.
Armor penetration of  British APDS Mk. 1T shell of OQF 77mm Gun Mk. II decreased from 226mm to 208mm.
HE Mk. 10T shell added as compatible with Matilda Black Prince tank gun.
The price of M103 tank Continental AV-1790-5B engine changed from 65,500 to 80,000 credits.
Load capacity of T25/2 suspension T25/2T1 suspension chanced from 43,800kg to 43,805kg.
Price of SU-122-44 camouflage patterns decreased by 12%.
SU-101 repairs cost decreased by 9%, profitability increased by 10%.
Fixed the armoring of Matilda tank sides. Now damage is not necessarily dealt upon penetration of spaced armor.

Type 59
                    
Increased the traverse speed from 45 to 46 deg/sec.
Reduced the gun dispersion during vehicle rotation by 5%.
Reduced ground resistance by 10%.
Changed the Norinco 12150L engine tier from IX to VIII.
Repair cost of Norinco 12150L engine has been increased by 22%.
Weight of the hull increased from 15,400kg to 16,478kg.
Armoring of the Type 59 turret increased from 104mm to 130mm.
Armoring of the Type 59 hull sides decreased  from 65mm to 60mm.
Reloading time of the Type 59 100mm gun increased from 8.0 sec to 8.7sec.
Increased the aiming time for the 100 mm Type 59 gun from 2.86 sec to 2.9 sec.
Increased the damage value of the Chuan bei-412 shell from 230 to 250 points.
Increased the penetration value of the Chuan bei-412 shell from 175mm to 181mm.
Increased the damage value of the Chuan chao-412 shell from 230 to 250 points.
Increased the penetration value of the Chuan chao-412 shell from 235mm to 241mm.
Increased the tower traverse speed from 45 to 46 deg/sec.

Type 62
                    
Load capacity of Type 62 suspension increased from 21,850kg to 24,000kg.
Turning time of Type 62 suspension increased from 45 to 54.
Gun dispersion on move or turning of Type 62 decreased by 16%.
Maneuverability on hard soils decreased on 34%.
Maneuverability on medium soils decreased on 32%.
Maneuverability on hard soft decreased on 23%.
Tier of Norinco 12150L-3 engine changed from VII to V.
Repair cost of Norinco 12150L-3 engine decreased by 56%.
Weight of the tank increased from 7400 to 7860 kg.
Type 62 moved to Tier VII.
Max speed increased from 50 km/h to 60 km/h.
Armoring of the lower front part of Type 62 turret decreased from 50mm to 45mm.
Armoring of Type 62 gun mantlet decreased from 90-115mm to 45mm.
Armoring of Type 62 turret rear side decreased from 32-36mm to 20mm.
Armoring of the top part of Type 62 hull front increased from 25mm to 35mm.
Armoring of the low part of Type 62 hull front increased from 25mm to 30mm.
Armoring of Type 62 hull sides decreased from 25mm to 20mm.
Armoring of Type 62 hull rear increased from 16mm to 20mm.
Armoring of Type 62 suspension increased from 10mm to 25mm.
Aiming time of Type 62-85TS increased from 2.29 sec to 2.3 sec.
Reloading time of Type 62-85TS decreased from 5.71 sec to 5.7 sec.
Dispersion of Type 62-85TS decreased from 0.39m to 0.37m.
Damage dealt by Po-365 shell increased from 160 to 180.
Armor penetration of Po-365 shell increased from 205mm to 250mm.
Damage dealt by Chuan bei-367 shell increased from 160 to 180.
Armor penetration of Chuan bei-367 shell increased from 130mm to 145mm.
Damage dealt by Sha bao-367 shell increased from 280 to 300 mm.
Rotation speed of Type 62 turret increased from 46 degree per second to 48 degree per second
Turret weight increased from 3,000kg to 5,000kg.
Durability increased from 690 to 880.

FV215B
                    
Load capacity of FV215b suspension increased from 68,000kg to 73,000kg.
Gun dispersion on move and rotation increased by 25%.
Weight of tank hull increased from 35,270kg to 37,358kg.
Armoring of FV215b turret front increased from 152mm to 254mm.
Armoring of FV215b turret 'cheekbones' increased from 112-130mm to 203-228mm.
Armoring of FV215b turret gun mantlet increased from 200mm to 254mm.
Armoring of FV215b turret sides increased from 89mm to 152.4mm.
Armoring of FV215b turret rear increased from 70mm to 101.6mm.
Commander's hatch armoring increase from 70-112mm to 101.6-152.4mm.
Armoring of top of hull front increased from 130mm to 152.4mm.
Armoring of top sloped side of hull front increased from 51mm to 101.6mm.
Armoring of hull sides increased from 130mm to 152.4mm.
Armoring of hull rear increased from 51mm to 76.2mm.
Reloading time of 120mm Gun L1A1 increased from 7.5 sec. to 8.7 sec.
Dispersion of 120mm Gun L1A1 increased by 14%.
Dispersion of 120mm Gun L1A1 on turret rotation increased by 60%.
Dispersion of 120mm Gun L1A1 increased from 0.32m to 0.33m.
Turret weight changed from 13,800kg to 16,500kg.
Durability decreased from 2,600 to 2,500.

IS:
                    Armoring of sides and rear of IS-122 and IS-85 turrets decreased from 100mm to 90mm.
Armoring of gun mantlet of IS-122 and IS-85 turrets decreased from 100mm to 60mm.
KV-1S:
                    Armoring of sides and read of KV-85 turret decreased from 100mm to 90mm.
Armoring of gun mantlet of KV-85 turret decreased from 100mm to 60mm.
Armoring of commander's hatch decreased from 100mm to 90mm.
Т-34:
                    Armoring of T34 mod. 1942 turret front and gun mantlet decreased from 60mm to 52mm.
Armoring of T34 mod. 1942 turret sides increased from 45mm to 52mm.
Thank you!


Mugsy_
Official 8.2 Fixes Feedback Thread
arrow
13.12.2012 22:39:55
 
Subject: Official 8.2 Fixes Feedback Thread
Link on message: #3246604

Mugsy_: Hello Tankers,
Please take a moment to share your thoughts on the 8.2 Fixes:

                    Fixed some hints in the Store.
Fixed incorrect auto-detect of the Texture Quality in the Graphics quality menu.
Fixed some errors in models and textures for the following vehicles: Object 268, Т-46, IS-8, T2 med, FV215b, M36 Jackson, Grille, Tiger II.
Fixed some names for American vehicles.
Fixed mechanics for receiving the "Sniper" achievement. Now shots on platoon mates, which caused no damage, are not counted.
Fixed sudden camera angle change when interacting with other objects (e.g. tanks).
Fixed the bug causing some shells to vanish after penetrating the mantlet striking the gun but not damaging it.
Fixed the bug causing shells to vanish after penetrating spaced armor and rebounding from the main armor.
Fixed "flying" tanks at high ping and significant loss of data packets.
Fixed the display and collision models discrepancy with some buildings and objects.
Fixed displacement and "tugging" of aim in the sniper mode.
Fixed an abnormally high damage from ramming in certain cases.
Fixed a low cost of repair of the tank after drowning.
Fixed the blocking of tank for CW after drowning.
Fixed a bug allowing a destroyed tank to continue gathering XP for spotting enemy vehicles.
Fixed camouflage errors of the Pz V/IV, A-32, M6A2E1 tanks.
Fixed in​sc​ri​ptions and emblems of the KV-5, M5 Stuart tanks.
Fixed incorrect displaying of hit/penetration marks on the KV-1S, Т110Е4.
Fixed incorrect shot effects of the 8.8cm KwK43 L/71 gun for the Tiger tank, 120 mm Gun T122 and 120 mm Gun M58 for the M103 tank.
Fixed incorrect exhaust effect of the В-2К engine for the KV engine.
Fixed the de​sc​ri​ption of the "Top Gun" and "Sniper" achievements requirements.
Fixed the de​sc​ri​ption of the "de Langlade's Medal" achievement.
Fixed the rare issue causing players to be placed into excluded game modes.
Fixed the disappearance burning effects on nearby vehicles.
Fixed the collision models for some buildings and objects.
Fixed the problem of entering 'pre-battle UI' during special battles, which one could leave afterward.
Fixed the discrepancies of W/L ratio percentage in different statistics windows.
Removed the damage dealt to own vehicle form the battle efficiency tab.
Fixed the rare occurence of an ammo rack critical hit not being counted in the after-battle statistics.\
Fixed the erroneous display of an SPG as a Tank on the mini map.
The sniper reticule settings no longer influce the arcade reticule settings.
Fixed some errors in the complaints list of the after-battle statistics.
Fixed an issue with the connection indicator.
Fixed the rare bug allowing a high-speed aim while using auto-aim during a full-stop of the vehicle.
Thank you!


Captain_Judo
Zhukov tournament illegal tiers
arrow
13.12.2012 20:41:34
 
Subject: Zhukov tournament illegal tiers
Link on message: #3245537

Captain_Judo: It's really simple. Just send me a PM. This saves our GM team ensuing headaches from dealing with unnecessary forum behavior.  :Smile_Default:


Captain_Judo
Zhukov Challenge
arrow
13.12.2012 20:35:19
 
Subject: Zhukov Challenge
Link on message: #3245470

View PostJOEPAIN, on Dec 13 2012 - 14:26, said: rules stated that 256 was the max allowed but you have told us 300 team were allowed

Captain_Judo: Not exactly..
Participation RequirementsThere is no maximum number of teams; all teams that fit the registration criteria may participate However, we do hear everyone's concern regarding latency at the beginning of tournaments. We're working with our global team to have a resolution in place prior to our next, large tournament.


Captain_Judo
Weekend Scrimmages
arrow
13.12.2012 20:30:14
 
Subject: Weekend Scrimmages
Link on message: #3245412

View Postnipp100, on Dec 13 2012 - 20:26, said: Its not about the quantity of gold, its about having some reward, if there was no gold prize at all in this tourney no one would play it.
Like i said, its about having your efforts rewarded, even if its little it will atract people to it, i dont play it for the gold itself cause 1k is not much, but if there was no prize i wouldnt participate at all.

Captain_Judo: Think of this format as a "pre-season" or "exhibition/friendly" mode. A similar format will be available, next year, with substantial rewards. If we find teams are not actively participating in scrimmages they register for, then we may remove gold rewards for scrimmages all together.


Captain_Judo
Zhukov tournament illegal tiers
arrow
13.12.2012 05:21:22
 
Subject: Zhukov tournament illegal tiers
Link on message: #3241134

Captain_Judo: For the record, making this information public is grounds for your dispute to be dismissed.
Please send me your documentation in a PM.


Captain_Judo
Weekend Scrimmages
arrow
13.12.2012 05:18:22
 
Subject: Weekend Scrimmages
Link on message: #3241108

View PostNetQuaker, on Dec 13 2012 - 00:37, said: ROTA GAME-OVER just got 1k gold from last weekend atm, is it a error or just a delay?
To bad we lost the starting time saturday, would be nice to fight against fulcrum

Captain_Judo: You're due 2,000 :) I'll look into it with our staff and make sure your amount due is correct. This goes with all other winners as well!


dance210
enemies used higher tier than they were suposed to
arrow
13.12.2012 04:35:11
 
Subject: enemies used higher tier than they were suposed to
Link on message: #3240810

dance210: OP, check this link here. It brings you to the rules for challenges, which includes how to dispute a team's action, e.g. bringing higher than the allowed tiers. Good luck!


dance210
He Pushed Me!
arrow
13.12.2012 04:04:27
 
Subject: He Pushed Me!
Link on message: #3240575

dance210: Not much to be done about the fine, as that is how the system is set up. However, pushing allies is a form of griefing and you can submit a support ticketwith the replay attached if you want.


dance210
WoT suggestion
arrow
13.12.2012 03:35:20
 
Subject: WoT suggestion
Link on message: #3240356

dance210: Couple of problems with limiting to two tiers, 25 points. Taking your (7, 5, 5) as an example, a platoon could bring two Tier 5 tanks into a Tier 9 match, which isn't as bad as bringing a Tier 1, but still outside what a Tier 5 (excluding lights and arty) would normally see.
The other issue would be not allowing platoons that would work, but are outside your 2 tier limit. An example is platooning a Tier 5 light with any Tier 10 tank - this is a perfectly reasonable match but your system would no longer allow it.


Hypnotik
Clan Wars Timeline (4/1/13 Update)
arrow
13.12.2012 03:04:54
 
Subject: Clan Wars Timeline (4/1/13 Update)
Link on message: #3240115

View PostRorys6, on Dec 12 2012 - 22:11, said: EDIT: Suggestion. Add another section at the top of the page called "Province History". When someone opens that, they get a list of all provinces. When they click it, it shows the entire history. It would have this kind of info.
Already there. This was part of the update.
Who had it.
Already there
When they got/lost it (each time, if they have had it more than once)
Capture date is already there
How many times they've fought for it (defense).
How many times they've fought for it (attack).
This info isn't currently available through WoT's API. I'm reasonably sure they do have it stored though. Maybe in the future.
How many times they've got it (if they lost it on the 3rd, and regained it on the 4th, that counts as twice).
Already there, just count how many times each team occurs.
How many days they've had it (total, and how many they owned it for each time they got it).
Already there.
How much gold they got from it (total).
Good suggestion and simple enough to do, just added it. This was already available on an individual clan page (Income Breakdown), but now is on the Provinces one too.

Hypnotik:


dance210
Winners of November's Creative Contest!
arrow
13.12.2012 00:57:00
 
Subject: Winners of November's Creative Contest!
Link on message: #3239136

View Postsourkraut, on Dec 12 2012 - 20:59, said: These are well written. No offence to those who are good at things like this, But what happened to worthwhile contests. The SEA server just had an animation contest, the EU server had a comic contest not to long ago, We used to have some interesting artistic contest here aswell. But it seems most of these are eithier Caption this! or take a picture of that. What became of the more creative contest that were just fun to watch. Seeing everyone post their entry in the forums and being in aww of some hilarious and amazing work.

dance210: You mean ones like the Halloween video contest, the Golden Joystick poster, banner, and Rageface comic contests, or even the bumper sticker contest? This was one writing contest after a variety of other creative contests and who knows what the next one will be.
The caption contest is relatively new and I don't think it will replace the other contests you are looking for. Hopefully you will enjoy the next one :)


Mugsy_
Official 8.2 User Interface Changes Feedback Thread
arrow
13.12.2012 00:01:01
 
Subject: Official 8.2 User Interface Changes Feedback Thread
Link on message: #3238559

Mugsy_: Hello Tankers,
Please leave us feedback on these changes:

                    Module icons will now have an animated repair progress indicator while in battle.
The tank tech tree will be condensed to better fit on the screen.
On the tank tech tree, a flag icon will allow you to return to the nation specific tree from the tank specific tree. This replaces the 'Back to Tech Tree' link.
On the tech tree, the research and credit/gold cost of tanks and their modules will be displayed regardless of whether they've been purchased.
On the tech tree, if there is a shortage of resources or experience, a pop up will show how much experience or credits is still necessary.
On the tech tree, vehicle specific experience has been made more prominent.
Changed armor thickness display (without changing the armoring itself) of the SU-5, T-46, КV-13, SU-85B, SU-101, Object 268, KV-2, KV-3, IS-3, KV-4, IS-8, IS-7, ISU-152, VK 4502 A, PzV Panther, Centurion, Centurion Mk3, FV4202, Covenanter, Cruiser MkI, Valentine, Caernarvon, Centurion, M6.
Restructured the visualization British tank names.
Fully reworked the design of the tank selling window.
Removed display of damage to allies from after-battle statistics.
For postmortem mode:
Fixed drowning indicator display.
Added the display for an 'empty ammo rack'.
Added to the a display for status of tank modules and crew members.
The login message "Cannot connect. Connection is blocked by firewall" has been changed to "Unable to connect to the server. Either the server is down for maintenance, or a connection settings check is required."
The old message received when attempting to login with an older version of the client has been changed from "The login packet sent to the server was malformed" to "Error in authorization game server. Your game client version may be outdated or damaged."
The '0' character has been removed from the kill counter displayed on the battle HUD. Instead, a blank space will appear when a player has no kills.
Thank you!


Mugsy_
Official 8.2 Graphic & Technical Improvements Feedback Thread
arrow
12.12.2012 23:59:03
 
Subject: Official 8.2 Graphic & Technical Improvements Feedback Thread
Link on message: #3238540

Mugsy_: Hello Tankers,
Please share your feedback and suggestions on the following changes:

                    
Draw distance (settings/graphics/draw distance) increased for minimum graphics quality settings from 400 to 600 meters, and from 1000 to 1400 meters for maximum graphics quality.

Improved rendering performance of trees and vegetation -- this should reduce loss of FPS in sniper mode when one has a large amount of vegetation on the screen.

Low performance fixed for some configurations (mainly for Radeon VGAs) for the following maps: Steppes, South Coast, Highway, Mines, Widepark, Abbey.

Reworked and optimized some destruction effects for buildings and objects.

Added shadows for vehicles in the garage.

Decreased brightness and density of emblems and in​sc​ri​ptions while in postmortem mode.
Thank you!


Mugsy_
Official 8.2 Game Mechanic Changes Feedback Thread
arrow
12.12.2012 23:56:35
 
Subject: Official 8.2 Game Mechanic Changes Feedback Thread
Link on message: #3238519

Mugsy_: Hello Tankers,
Please let us know your thoughts, feedback, and suggestions on these mechanic updates.
                    
Fallen trees are counted as masking cover (like bushes) for the visibility system (fallen trees were previously excluded from the calculation of visibility).
Reduced or completely removed tank vibration when traveling over ruins, rails, and small objects.
Decreased the time of tank stabilization on hillsides.
Patrol Duty achievement is now counted in the Kay's Medal achievement.
The Panther M10 is added to the Hunter achievement.
Steel Wall medal is no longer granted after a death due to suicide.
Brothers In Arms perk now gives a bonus to Mentor perk.
You are no longer able to retrain crewmen to tanks which are researched but are not present in the Garage.
Thank you!


Mugsy_
Official 8.2 Improvements to Sounds Feedback Thread
arrow
12.12.2012 23:54:49
 
Subject: Official 8.2 Improvements to Sounds Feedback Thread
Link on message: #3238506

Mugsy_: Hello Tankers,
We'd love to hear your feedback on the changes 8.2 brought to the sounds of World of Tanks.
                    
New sounds for when shells hit various landscape objects
New sounds for low-caliber guns.
Increased the radius at which guns can be heard.
Changed the characteristics of gun sounds at greater distances.
Noise of fans was removed from Premium Hangar.
Thank you.
*Bonus points for any puns.


Mugsy_
Official 8.2 New Achievements Feedback Thread
arrow
12.12.2012 23:51:48
 
Subject: Official 8.2 New Achievements Feedback Thread
Link on message: #3238471

Mugsy_: Hello Tankers,
Please leave your suggestions and feedback on the following 8.2 updates:
                    
Added the "Patton Valley" achievement for the destruction of 100 M46 Pattons or M48A1 Patton IIIs.
After the update's release, all previously destroyed tanks (of this type) will be counted.
Added "Commemoratives" -- achievements without a grade, which can be granted to a number of players several times per battle:'Lucky' -- Witness the destruction of an enemy vehicle by an enemy team player. You must be 10 meters or less from the enemy vehicle at the moment of its destruction.
'Cool-Headed' -- Survive at least 10 ricochets and non-penetrations in a row from enemy players.
'Spartan' -- Survive a ricochet or non-penetration from an enemy team player. Your vehicle must have less than 10% of its hit points left, and you have to survive in the battle.
'Ranger' -- Destroy all enemy light tanks (at least three) in the course of one battle.
Thank you!


Mugsy_
Official 8.2 Map Changes Feedback Thread
arrow
12.12.2012 23:49:52
 
Subject: Official 8.2 Map Changes Feedback Thread
Link on message: #3238453

Mugsy_: Hello Tankers,
8.2 brought changes to the following maps  to take advantage of the new rendering system: Prokhorovka, Redshire, Erlenberg, Ruinberg.
Please share your feedback and suggestions with us below.
Thank you!


Mugsy_
Official 8.2 New Premium Tanks Feedback Thread
arrow
12.12.2012 23:47:24
 
Subject: Official 8.2 New Premium Tanks Feedback Thread
Link on message: #3238438

Mugsy_: Hello Tankers,
Please leave your feedback and suggestions below.
                    
New premium tanks available for purchase: British heavy tank TOG-2 (Tier VI), British TD АТ-15А (Tier VII), French heavy tank 1945 FCM 50t (Tier VIII).
Thank you!


Mugsy_
Official 8.2 New American Tank Line Feedback Thread
arrow
12.12.2012 23:45:28
 
Subject: Official 8.2 New American Tank Line Feedback Thread
Link on message: #3238418

Mugsy_: Hello Tankers,
Please share your feedback and suggestions on the new American Tank line.
                    
New line of American tanks: light Т21, light Т71, medium Т69, medium Т54E1, heavy T57 (one can start researching this line from the medium М7 tank).
Thank you!


Mugsy_
8.2 Official Feedback Threads List
arrow
12.12.2012 23:39:20
 
Subject: 8.2 Official Feedback Threads List
Link on message: #3238365

Mugsy_: Welcome to the 8.2!
In order to keep the forum clean for the large player base, and to make it easier to collect your valued feedback on these update changes.
Please post your feedback and suggestions on the below topics into their associated official threads.
Official New American Tank Line Feedback Thread
Official New Premium Tanks Feedback Thread
Official Map Changes Feedback Thread
Official New Achievements Feedback Thread
Official Improvements to Sound and Audio Feedback Thread
Official Game Mechanic Changes Feedback Thread
Official Graphic and technical improvements Feedback Thread
Official User interface Feedback Thread
Official Fixes Feedback Thread
Official Vehicle Rebalancing & Changes Feedback Thread
Please remember to keep your discussions in these threads on topic, and civil.
Thanks for your cooperation in this matter & happy tanking!!


Hypnotik
Clan Wars Timeline (4/1/13 Update)
arrow
12.12.2012 23:32:11
 
Subject: Clan Wars Timeline (4/1/13 Update)
Link on message: #3238303

View PostXpedience, on Dec 12 2012 - 21:02, said: uh.. does this mean you will be learning to actually play tanks marginally well soon?

Hypnotik: Maybe if you'd sign on once in a while, you could teach me. Otherwise I'll forever be bad@tanks.


Captain_Judo
Skirmish XXVIII
arrow
12.12.2012 22:32:42
 
Subject: Skirmish XXVIII
Link on message: #3237781

View PostCanucker, on Dec 12 2012 - 22:31, said: why is british crew only highlighted?
what other crew can you run in a british tank?

Captain_Judo: This is to distinguish between British tanks under the soviet tree.


Captain_Judo
Skirmish XXVIII
arrow
12.12.2012 22:29:39
 
Subject: Skirmish XXVIII
Link on message: #3237743

Captain_Judo: We're attempting another British skirmish with rules clearly defined. This time around we are increasing one tier to allow tier 6 heavies and mediums.
RegistrationRegistration begins: December 12, 2012
Registration ends: December 14, 2012 at 9:00AM PDT (12:00PM EDT) Victory ConditionsThe winner of each round will be determined as the first to 3 victories on a given map.
Each battle will last 10 minutes.
The Encounter battle mode will be used for this tournament. Tier & Point Limits
With maximum number of 7 players per battle, a team (maximum 10 players per team) must field a selection of tanks based on the below tier limits.Heavy: 6
Medium: 6
Light: 5
TD: n/a
SPG: n/aBritish Tanks with British Crew Only!
34 Tier Point Limit Schedule
Rounds will begin at 7:30PM PDT (10:30PM EST, 02:30 UTC) each scheduled day. Curious what time this is in your region? Use this handy Time Zone Converter to help you out!Round 1: December 17th
Round 2: December 18th
Round 3: December 19th
Round 4: December 20th
Round 5: December 21st
Round 6: December 22nd There will be a 2 minute break in between rounds.
Prizes
The following prizes will be provided to each member of the respective team, including reserves.First place: 5,000
Second place: 2,000
Third place: 1,000
Fourth place: 1,000 Maps
There will only be one map used during Skirmish XXVIII. The map played on will be Sand River.
**Note: Wargaming America's eSports wants your tournament replays for feedback analysis. We request one replay from each round's winning captain. Please submit your replay to tournaments@worldoftanks.com as an attachment.


Captain_Judo
Weekend Scrimmages
arrow
12.12.2012 21:31:43
 
Subject: Weekend Scrimmages
Link on message: #3237215

View PostBeasts_of_the_East, on Dec 12 2012 - 17:44, said: Too bad registration didn't open yesterday, would have been easier for some of us. But I hope registration will open soon?

Captain_Judo: Registration is open for this weekend :)
To all teams: please be mindful of your other commitments this weekend (Zhukov Challenge, Skirmish XXVII) prior to submitting a team for a scrimmage!

View Postnipp100, on Dec 12 2012 - 20:13, said: Yes, please keep doing those tourneys, its fast, fun and great for training.
I just have one sugestion, give prizes to the 2nd of each group too, nothing fancy, something like 400-500 gold (or less). Like was stated before, when people see they cant get the 1st place they simply give up, its been at least 2 technicals each day for us, mostly because of that.
Or maybe increase the number of teams per group and increase the prizes too, just as an incentive for the teams to keep fighting.

Captain_Judo: I don't think adding more prizes encourages participation. We're offering scrimmages as a practice resource. The reality is, it's difficult to win the 1,000 gold against the quality teams that are regularly participating and I don't think that 1,000 gold, itself, brings teams to scrimmage.


Реклама | Adv