Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Update 9.3 Feedback Thread
Link on message: #7846457
Mugwomp, on Sep 25 2014 - 14:55, said: Well you have done it now.I first had lots of points left over when
you changed the T50-2 to the M25 (19,000 points extra) , Now
you have done the same thing with my KV-1S ,it has changed to the
KV-85 another 19,000 points extra.That was a lot of playing for
nothing .What am I supposed to do with all the extra points? I am
not going to be spending any Gold to convert them to Free
Points.That was a heck of a lot of grinding for NOTHING. I was
silly enough to buy more gold last night and at this point of
the game I want my Money back .I am pissed at the bad changes you
have done.
Link on message: #7846457
Mugwomp, on Sep 25 2014 - 14:55, said: Well you have done it now.I first had lots of points left over when
you changed the T50-2 to the M25 (19,000 points extra) , Now
you have done the same thing with my KV-1S ,it has changed to the
KV-85 another 19,000 points extra.That was a lot of playing for
nothing .What am I supposed to do with all the extra points? I am
not going to be spending any Gold to convert them to Free
Points.That was a heck of a lot of grinding for NOTHING. I was
silly enough to buy more gold last night and at this point of
the game I want my Money back .I am pissed at the bad changes you
have done.KMaus: I'm sorry to hear about your experience with the KV and your
gold purchase, and understand your frustration. We know you
dont have to come into the forums and help us out with feedback,
and we're grateful you're here. I'd love it if you wouldnt mind
taking a moment to send in a CS ticket, and let's see if we can't
figure out how to help you have a better experience.
Subject: Update 9.3 Feedback Thread
Link on message: #7846436
Link on message: #7846436
KMaus: Thanks everyone taking the time to report bugs and give feedback.
There's some really great stuff here, and just want to let you know
we're in here reading & passing everything along on your behalf.
Keep it coming & thank you!
Subject: Update 9.3 Feedback Thread
Link on message: #7846436
Link on message: #7846436
KMaus: Thanks everyone taking the time to report bugs and give feedback.
There's some really great stuff here, and just want to let you know
we're in here reading & passing everything along on your behalf.
Keep it coming & thank you!
Subject: Update 9.3 Feedback Thread
Link on message: #7846430
JayHollyLion, on Sep 25 2014 - 14:34, said: I heard that the percentage has been changed, but visually still
shows it as 65, 85, 95.
Link on message: #7846430
JayHollyLion, on Sep 25 2014 - 14:34, said: I heard that the percentage has been changed, but visually still
shows it as 65, 85, 95.KMaus: This is a typo / graphical error on our part. The values
have changed, but are not being properly reflected. Working on
getting this fixed for you, but until then, please know that the
actual in-game values should be working properly, even if what you
see right now isn't matching up. Apologies for this, and thanks for
reporting!
Subject: Update 9.3 Feedback Thread
Link on message: #7846430
JayHollyLion, on Sep 25 2014 - 14:34, said: I heard that the percentage has been changed, but visually still
shows it as 65, 85, 95.
Link on message: #7846430
JayHollyLion, on Sep 25 2014 - 14:34, said: I heard that the percentage has been changed, but visually still
shows it as 65, 85, 95.KMaus: This is a typo / graphical error on our part. The values
have changed, but are not being properly reflected. Working on
getting this fixed for you, but until then, please know that the
actual in-game values should be working properly, even if what you
see right now isn't matching up. Apologies for this, and thanks for
reporting!
Subject: S.I.M.P., Timed Out talk 'Rumble in the West'
Link on message: #7846170
Link on message: #7846170
JRobAndSteal: SIMP, Timed Out talk Rumble in the West. “We play in worse
conditions than all teams in North America (high ping, packet loss,
lower hardware and generic peripherals) and even managed to beat
them,” says Campos (Timed Out). “We are the best team in Latin
America today.” http://worldoftanks.com/en/news/pc-browser/tournaments/rumble-in-the-west-semifinals/
Subject: S.I.M.P., Timed Out talk 'Rumble in the West'
Link on message: #7846170
Link on message: #7846170
JRobAndSteal: SIMP, Timed Out talk Rumble in the West. “We play in worse
conditions than all teams in North America (high ping, packet loss,
lower hardware and generic peripherals) and even managed to beat
them,” says Campos (Timed Out). “We are the best team in Latin
America today.” http://worldoftanks.com/en/news/pc-browser/tournaments/rumble-in-the-west-semifinals/
Subject: Update 9.3 Feedback Thread
Link on message: #7845909
CallMeBud, on Sep 25 2014 - 12:09, said: Personal experience with Stronghold invite of external clan
members: MITS is a member of Gentlemen Gaming, along with HT
and SSGS. We were looking forward to being able to support
each clan in our community in regards to Strongholds. Having
said that, we immediately attempted to invite SSGS and HT members
to a MITS Stronghold. The invite function will not
allow us to invite people with clan tags. This is simply
dumb. Feedback: First off, inviting people to our
Strongholds should have been UNIVERSAL, so gaming communities with
multiple clans can invite anyone across the board. At the
moment, we cannot invite SSGS members, nor HT. This
limitation that prohibits Gentlemen Gaming community of clans are
unable to support one another in Strongholds. Let me
emphasize this with Wargaming.net - Inviting people to Strongholds
that have no clan tags is not conducive to our community
goals. If we wanted to create a public environment such as a
platoon, we wouldn't be using Strongholds in the first place.
Effectively, the new ability to invite non-clan
members to Stronghold battles, a clan-based battle model, makes
absolutely no sense. Recommendation: Providing
Wargaming.net values the ability to add other members to a
Stronghold team, it is imperative that you create a UNIVERSAL
invite mechanism. Specifics of the recommendation:
Create a community menu where an invite can be sent out to a clan
officer, where an agreement is in place to support
Strongholds. This allows clans inside a community to join
other clan Strongholds.
t42592, on Sep 25 2014 - 12:28, said: My current role in SSGS is advisory, consultant, and to some
degree a manager in the MITS clan. Our goal in regards to our
community clans is to support their growth, training, platooning,
and internal Stronghold goals. Earlier today, SSGS was
unable to join our MITS members in a Stronghold assembly
area. Frankly, we are very disappointed that WG decided to
exclude clan tagged members from invitations to other clan oriented
Strongholds. This limitation defeats the very nature of
sending out invites to other players, especially those in our
gaming community. We want to support each other, and
Strongholds would have enabled our ability to do so.
Wargaming.net, in a word, fail. This limitation has no basis,
if only to build feelers for non-clan members, we have other
methods of assessing pubs, and bringing them in to a team-oriented
Stronghold, is not one of them. For this, we use platoons in
public matches. What were you thinking when you added this
feature to Strongholds? Did you think clans would teach pubs
team work? What if the pub rejects how we roll? Pubs
would be welcomed into a clan environment? Pubs would
appreciate the structure we expect? Pubs would be an asset to a
clan environment? Pubs would operate in a team-oriented
capacity? Pubs would play in a team format? Sorry, these are
some of the assumptions I feel WG addressed. There are
mechanisms in place for this - Team Battles, Platooning. I
think that there is a hidden agenda by WG to sabotage Strongholds
by letting pubs play along side people that have very different
views about winning. I think WG does not intend to support
Strongholds in the theme of team-oriented gaming. By allowing
clans to invite pubs, this model will not promote team work, and
will actually destroy a clans ability to vet new members - we do
this external to Strongholds, and Clan Wars. I support this
recommendation, as does the bulk of the leadership within Gentlemen
Gaming community. Fix it, Wargaming.net, implement UNIVERSAL
invites, if necessary, create an allie panel so there are
agreements in place, non-aggression pacts, whatever.
Link on message: #7845909
CallMeBud, on Sep 25 2014 - 12:09, said: Personal experience with Stronghold invite of external clan
members: MITS is a member of Gentlemen Gaming, along with HT
and SSGS. We were looking forward to being able to support
each clan in our community in regards to Strongholds. Having
said that, we immediately attempted to invite SSGS and HT members
to a MITS Stronghold. The invite function will not
allow us to invite people with clan tags. This is simply
dumb. Feedback: First off, inviting people to our
Strongholds should have been UNIVERSAL, so gaming communities with
multiple clans can invite anyone across the board. At the
moment, we cannot invite SSGS members, nor HT. This
limitation that prohibits Gentlemen Gaming community of clans are
unable to support one another in Strongholds. Let me
emphasize this with Wargaming.net - Inviting people to Strongholds
that have no clan tags is not conducive to our community
goals. If we wanted to create a public environment such as a
platoon, we wouldn't be using Strongholds in the first place.
Effectively, the new ability to invite non-clan
members to Stronghold battles, a clan-based battle model, makes
absolutely no sense. Recommendation: Providing
Wargaming.net values the ability to add other members to a
Stronghold team, it is imperative that you create a UNIVERSAL
invite mechanism. Specifics of the recommendation:
Create a community menu where an invite can be sent out to a clan
officer, where an agreement is in place to support
Strongholds. This allows clans inside a community to join
other clan Strongholds.HBFT:
t42592, on Sep 25 2014 - 12:28, said: My current role in SSGS is advisory, consultant, and to some
degree a manager in the MITS clan. Our goal in regards to our
community clans is to support their growth, training, platooning,
and internal Stronghold goals. Earlier today, SSGS was
unable to join our MITS members in a Stronghold assembly
area. Frankly, we are very disappointed that WG decided to
exclude clan tagged members from invitations to other clan oriented
Strongholds. This limitation defeats the very nature of
sending out invites to other players, especially those in our
gaming community. We want to support each other, and
Strongholds would have enabled our ability to do so.
Wargaming.net, in a word, fail. This limitation has no basis,
if only to build feelers for non-clan members, we have other
methods of assessing pubs, and bringing them in to a team-oriented
Stronghold, is not one of them. For this, we use platoons in
public matches. What were you thinking when you added this
feature to Strongholds? Did you think clans would teach pubs
team work? What if the pub rejects how we roll? Pubs
would be welcomed into a clan environment? Pubs would
appreciate the structure we expect? Pubs would be an asset to a
clan environment? Pubs would operate in a team-oriented
capacity? Pubs would play in a team format? Sorry, these are
some of the assumptions I feel WG addressed. There are
mechanisms in place for this - Team Battles, Platooning. I
think that there is a hidden agenda by WG to sabotage Strongholds
by letting pubs play along side people that have very different
views about winning. I think WG does not intend to support
Strongholds in the theme of team-oriented gaming. By allowing
clans to invite pubs, this model will not promote team work, and
will actually destroy a clans ability to vet new members - we do
this external to Strongholds, and Clan Wars. I support this
recommendation, as does the bulk of the leadership within Gentlemen
Gaming community. Fix it, Wargaming.net, implement UNIVERSAL
invites, if necessary, create an allie panel so there are
agreements in place, non-aggression pacts, whatever.HBFT: Thank you very much for communicating your feedback
and recommendations on how we might improve the new
Legionaries Stronghold feature. With regards
to your stated desire to support other
Clans from Gentlemen Gaming, I can definitely see how the
current iteration of Legionaries would fall short of your
expectations. As an aside, I personally see Legionaries as a
great way to interact with new battle callers/prospective
members in a competitive environment. That having been
said, please know that this feature is still new and we
will continue to monitor and collect feedback (such as the feedback
provided here) so that we can continue to have a constructive
discussion about possible improvements to World of Tanks!
Just wanted to pop-in and say thank you. :)
Subject: Fireflys in Korea
Link on message: #7845401
jmesser23, on Sep 24 2014 - 19:19, said: Is it possible that the reason some sources list the Firefly
as tank used by Commonwealth troops in Korea might be due to the
fact that they misidentified the E8?
DracoArgentum, on Sep 25 2014 - 00:54, said: Tanks specific or do you help research the other games in
the stable?
Link on message: #7845401
jmesser23, on Sep 24 2014 - 19:19, said: Is it possible that the reason some sources list the Firefly
as tank used by Commonwealth troops in Korea might be due to the
fact that they misidentified the E8?The_Warhawk: It's possible. I'm genuinely curious, what source did you
find that mentions Sherman Fireflies being used in Korea?
DracoArgentum, on Sep 25 2014 - 00:54, said: Tanks specific or do you help research the other games in
the stable?The_Warhawk: I'm sort of a general research assistant. Most of my
life I've been studying aviation, but I know my way around a tank
or two as well. I've got some naval knowledge too. I also track
down The_Chieftain's coffee mug whenever it goes
missing 
Subject: Final de Semana Arte da Guerra
Link on message: #7845062
Link on message: #7845062
Content_WG: “Aparente estar fraco quando está forte, e forte quando está
fraco”. Iluda seus inimigos com a arte da guerra!
Texto completo da notícia
Texto completo da notícia
Subject: Art of War Weekend
Link on message: #7845059
Link on message: #7845059
Content_WG: "Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak".
Deceive your enemies with the art of war!
Full news text
Full news text
Subject: Discussion: WGLNA Silver League, Summer 2014
Link on message: #7845049
Shinma_, on Sep 25 2014 - 11:17, said: I think we'd all be cool for the alt. prize of you
three doing some kind of parody of the empire records Rex Manning
video.
Link on message: #7845049
Shinma_, on Sep 25 2014 - 11:17, said: I think we'd all be cool for the alt. prize of you
three doing some kind of parody of the empire records Rex Manning
video. dance210: Hmmm I don't know what that video is, sorry :(
Subject: Mini Concurso: SchnelQue?
Link on message: #7844623
olaechea, on Sep 24 2014 - 12:18, said: A ver, es difícil definirte un nombre sin mas info que tu nombre
actual y que trabajas en wargaming... hechanos un hueso... gustos
musicales, peliculas, pasatiempos... técnicamente no sabemos si
eres hombre o mujer... Y si eres mujer... pon una foto pues
;-)
Link on message: #7844623
olaechea, on Sep 24 2014 - 12:18, said: A ver, es difícil definirte un nombre sin mas info que tu nombre
actual y que trabajas en wargaming... hechanos un hueso... gustos
musicales, peliculas, pasatiempos... técnicamente no sabemos si
eres hombre o mujer... Y si eres mujer... pon una foto pues
;-)SchnellerDamon: uy todo un caballero
. Pero te tengo que decepcionar y
informarte que soy hombre
Bueno un poco de mi, soy
Mexicano (de la capital), el equipo de mis amores es el América y
pues de gustos musicales hay demasiados!
Subject: Mini Concurso: SchnelQue?
Link on message: #7844623
olaechea, on Sep 24 2014 - 12:18, said: A ver, es difícil definirte un nombre sin mas info que tu nombre
actual y que trabajas en wargaming... hechanos un hueso... gustos
musicales, peliculas, pasatiempos... técnicamente no sabemos si
eres hombre o mujer... Y si eres mujer... pon una foto pues
;-)
Link on message: #7844623
olaechea, on Sep 24 2014 - 12:18, said: A ver, es difícil definirte un nombre sin mas info que tu nombre
actual y que trabajas en wargaming... hechanos un hueso... gustos
musicales, peliculas, pasatiempos... técnicamente no sabemos si
eres hombre o mujer... Y si eres mujer... pon una foto pues
;-)ElPozoleOlmeca: uy todo un caballero
. Pero te tengo que decepcionar y
informarte que soy hombre
Bueno un poco de mi, soy
Mexicano (de la capital), el equipo de mis amores es el América y
pues de gustos musicales hay demasiados!
Subject: Mini Concurso: SchnelQue?
Link on message: #7844623
olaechea, on Sep 24 2014 - 12:18, said: A ver, es difícil definirte un nombre sin mas info que tu nombre
actual y que trabajas en wargaming... hechanos un hueso... gustos
musicales, peliculas, pasatiempos... técnicamente no sabemos si
eres hombre o mujer... Y si eres mujer... pon una foto pues
;-)
Link on message: #7844623
olaechea, on Sep 24 2014 - 12:18, said: A ver, es difícil definirte un nombre sin mas info que tu nombre
actual y que trabajas en wargaming... hechanos un hueso... gustos
musicales, peliculas, pasatiempos... técnicamente no sabemos si
eres hombre o mujer... Y si eres mujer... pon una foto pues
;-)PollotheDestroyer: uy todo un caballero
. Pero te tengo que decepcionar y
informarte que soy hombre
Bueno un poco de mi, soy
Mexicano (de la capital), el equipo de mis amores es el América y
pues de gustos musicales hay demasiados!
Subject: Mini Concurso: SchnelQue?
Link on message: #7844623
olaechea, on Sep 24 2014 - 12:18, said: A ver, es difícil definirte un nombre sin mas info que tu nombre
actual y que trabajas en wargaming... hechanos un hueso... gustos
musicales, peliculas, pasatiempos... técnicamente no sabemos si
eres hombre o mujer... Y si eres mujer... pon una foto pues
;-)
Link on message: #7844623
olaechea, on Sep 24 2014 - 12:18, said: A ver, es difícil definirte un nombre sin mas info que tu nombre
actual y que trabajas en wargaming... hechanos un hueso... gustos
musicales, peliculas, pasatiempos... técnicamente no sabemos si
eres hombre o mujer... Y si eres mujer... pon una foto pues
;-)ApolloArtemis: uy todo un caballero
. Pero te tengo que decepcionar y
informarte que soy hombre
Bueno un poco de mi, soy
Mexicano (de la capital), el equipo de mis amores es el América y
pues de gustos musicales hay demasiados!
Subject: You were issued a warning, really?
Link on message: #7844596
e_JP, on Sep 25 2014 - 09:44, said: Vanilla, except HR Sound mod 1.944.
Link on message: #7844596
e_JP, on Sep 25 2014 - 09:44, said: Vanilla, except HR Sound mod 1.944.Pigeon_of_War: We have confirmed at the office that the any Sound mods will
crash the client. A good rule of thumb for a new patch is to always
uninstall your mods.
Capitao_Desastre_
Francês Conheça o AMX 65T, Uma outra Camada 9 Pesado. :). E VEJA OS Novo...
25.09.2014 20:36:07
Subject: Francês Conheça o AMX 65T, Uma outra Camada 9 Pesado. :). E VEJA OS Novo...
Link on message: #7844409
WarStore, on Sep 25 2014 - 18:32, said: Não precisa colocar tudo. Só abrir um ramo separado a partir
do AMX13 90 com o AMX 30 Prot e AMX 30. Se surgir novos candidatos,
é só ir alterando a linha, como sempre foi. Imagina se não
existisse o indien panzer? Iríamos ficar sem o Leopard para sempre?
Link on message: #7844409
WarStore, on Sep 25 2014 - 18:32, said: Não precisa colocar tudo. Só abrir um ramo separado a partir
do AMX13 90 com o AMX 30 Prot e AMX 30. Se surgir novos candidatos,
é só ir alterando a linha, como sempre foi. Imagina se não
existisse o indien panzer? Iríamos ficar sem o Leopard para sempre?Capitao_Desastre_: Verdade, e o exemplo dado é possívelmente a melhor hipotese
de ter o AMX 30 no jogo.
Claro que se desse para ter uma linha completa, melhor. Mas tanto quanto sei, pelo menos para o AMX 30 há informação suficiente.
Claro que se desse para ter uma linha completa, melhor. Mas tanto quanto sei, pelo menos para o AMX 30 há informação suficiente.
Subject: 9.3 marks of excellence
Link on message: #7844085
Link on message: #7844085
KMaus: Looks like it's a typo error - the values have been changed, but
they show the old values still. We're looking to get this fixed,
thanks for reporting!
Subject: 9.3 marks of excellence
Link on message: #7844085
Link on message: #7844085
KMaus: Looks like it's a typo error - the values have been changed, but
they show the old values still. We're looking to get this fixed,
thanks for reporting!
Subject: Discussion: WGLNA Silver League, Summer 2014
Link on message: #7844075
SILVER_FOX413, on Sep 25 2014 - 09:33, said: What will they be? Who should expect them?
Link on message: #7844075
SILVER_FOX413, on Sep 25 2014 - 09:33, said: What will they be? Who should expect them?Yoott: Opens up the secret awards box marked (Don't tell anyone)
next to me ...... oohh these are cool...... oh sorry ..... move
along ... nothing to see here
Subject: Discussion: WGLNA Silver League, Summer 2014
Link on message: #7844075
SILVER_FOX413, on Sep 25 2014 - 09:33, said: What will they be? Who should expect them?
Link on message: #7844075
SILVER_FOX413, on Sep 25 2014 - 09:33, said: What will they be? Who should expect them?Yoott: Opens up the secret awards box marked (Don't tell anyone)
next to me ...... oohh these are cool...... oh sorry ..... move
along ... nothing to see here
Subject: 9.3 marks of excellence
Link on message: #7844018
Link on message: #7844018
KMaus: Looking into this now, thanks for posting!
Subject: 9.3 marks of excellence
Link on message: #7844018
Link on message: #7844018
KMaus: Looking into this now, thanks for posting!
Subject: Skirmish 37 Standings
Link on message: #7843950
Link on message: #7843950
dance210: Skirmish 37 Gold Prize Breakdown Top 10% - 5,000 gold Team
rank 1 - 14 Top 11 - 20% - 2,500 gold Team rank 15 - 28 Top 21 -
30% - 1,000 gold Team rank 31 - 42 Top 31 - 40% - 750 gold
Team rank 45 - 56 Top 41 - 50% - 500 gold Team rank 58 - 69 1 !!!
[Relic] THE SHREKONING 2 GET_REKT_M8 2 PouTine BBQ 4 73RD Supply
Company 4 PTSD: Scharn's curious addiction 6 lu la la 7 Shake n'
Bake 8 ze Foxey Baddies 9 -G- Anime Club 10 TTIME 11 Big Forehead,
Big Dreams 12 v-V-v 13 Falcon Pluckers 14 Liquid Myth 15 ! Zouth
Zpawn Bezt Zpawn 15 Blue Baddle Tonks 17 GetDunked 17 Just in case
17 Skirts and Bike Shorts 17 xxxXEdge_FedoraMasters_animeXxxx 21
Ping 999 21 XABKA 23 Technical Defeat 24 Bearly Legal 24 Roxy and
Friends 26 Wotlabs Master Race 27 chihuahuas 28 Germane Riposte 28
Team Honey Badgers! 28 Where is Maus 31 Rainbow's Riotous
Ragamuffins 32 Battletoads 32 Just Gaming Russ 32 Problem Btween
Keyboard an Chair 35 ACME- 35 Goopy Vanilla Ice Cream 37 MAD1 38
Caffeine-Free ST0DA Pop! 38 Exterminatus Cadre 38 Tacos 'Я' Us 41
Pasteleros 42 NO SIMPATHY 42 Cazadores de Focas 42 OMG! Los
Manquitos 45 C'est La Vie 46 -|Vorbild Hussars|- 46 Skull Fugged 48
Eclipse Gaming Ink 49 Hells panzer division 49 The Beetle Smashers
51 Crackers 52 Los Buitres 52 Steel Rain 54 Heroes 55 Got worms? 56
Grizzly Meltdown 56 Hölle ist gut 58 Cow 59 A Tapir, Darkly 60 The
Hustlers 61 323rd 61 7th Epic NHL Team of Urban Decay 61 Delivery
de Furia 61 The Devils Brigade 65 Netizens & Friends 66
_sMILEy_fACEs_ 66 =VX9= 66 Watchmen 69 BOSS Gaming 69 FAR MMHVMJ 69
-SOB- 69 UnrealDown 69 UPAQ 37-A1 69 Why So Serious???
Subject: Skirmish 37 Standings
Link on message: #7843902
Link on message: #7843902
dance210: Green = Top 50% ; Grey = Tie-breakers
; Red = Lower 50% The following teams have a
tie-breaker match tonight: BOSS Gaming FAR MMHVMJ -SOB- UnrealDown
UPAQ 37-A1 Why So Serious??? Rank Team Name Games Played
Points Points Possible Win % 1 !!! [Relic] THE SHREKONING 21 58 63
0.921 2 GET_REKT_M8 21 57 63 0.905 2 PouTine BBQ 21 57 63 0.905 4
73RD Supply Company 20 54 60 0.900 4 PTSD: Scharn's curious
addiction 20 54 60 0.900 6 lu la la 19 51 57 0.895 7 Shake n' Bake
21 56 63 0.889 8 ze Foxey Baddies 21 55 63 0.873 9 -G- Anime Club
20 52 60 0.867 10 TTIME 19 49 57 0.860 11 Big Forehead, Big Dreams
21 54 63 0.857 12 v-V-v 20 51 60 0.850 13 Falcon Pluckers 19 48 57
0.842 14 Liquid Myth 20 50 60 0.833 15 ! Zouth Zpawn Bezt Zpawn 21
52 63 0.825 15 Blue Baddle Tonks 21 52 63 0.825 17 GetDunked 21 51
63 0.810 17 Just in case 21 51 63 0.810 17 Skirts and Bike Shorts
21 51 63 0.810 17 xxxXEdge_FedoraMasters_animeXxxx 21 51 63 0.810
21 Ping 999 20 48 60 0.800 21 XABKA 20 48 60 0.800 23 Technical
Defeat 21 50 63 0.794 24 Bearly Legal 21 49 63 0.778 24 Roxy and
Friends 21 49 63 0.778 26 Wotlabs Master Race 20 46 60 0.767 27
chihuahuas 21 48 63 0.762 28 Germane Riposte 20 45 60 0.750 28 Team
Honey Badgers! 20 45 60 0.750 28 Where is Maus 20 45 60 0.750 31
Rainbow's Riotous Ragamuffins 21 47 63 0.746 32 Battletoads 20 44
60 0.733 32 Just Gaming Russ 20 44 60 0.733 32 Problem Btween
Keyboard an Chair 20 44 60 0.733 35 ACME- 20 43 60 0.717 35 Goopy
Vanilla Ice Cream 20 43 60 0.717 37 MAD1 21 45 63 0.714 38
Caffeine-Free ST0DA Pop! 20 42 60 0.700 38 Exterminatus Cadre 20 42
60 0.700 38 Tacos 'Я' Us 20 42 60 0.700 41 Pasteleros 19 39 57
0.684 42 NO SIMPATHY 20 41 60 0.683 42 Cazadores de Focas 21 43 63
0.683 42 OMG! Los Manquitos 21 43 63 0.683 45 C'est La Vie 18 36 54
0.667 46 -|Vorbild Hussars|- 21 41 63 0.651 46 Skull Fugged 21 41
63 0.651 48 Eclipse Gaming Ink 20 39 60 0.650 49 Hells panzer
division 21 39 63 0.619 49 The Beetle Smashers 21 39 63 0.619 51
Crackers 21 38 63 0.603 52 Los Buitres 20 36 60 0.600 52 Steel Rain
20 36 60 0.600 54 Heroes 21 37 63 0.587 55 Got worms? 19 33 57
0.579 56 Grizzly Meltdown 21 36 63 0.571 56 Hölle ist gut 21 36 63
0.571 58 Cow 20 33 60 0.550 59 A Tapir, Darkly 19 31 57 0.544 60
The Hustlers 21 34 63 0.540 61 323rd 21 33 63 0.524 61 7th Epic NHL
Team of Urban Decay 21 33 63 0.524 61 Delivery de Furia 21 33 63
0.524 61 The Devils Brigade 21 33 63 0.524 65 Netizens & Friends 21
32 63 0.508 66 _sMILEy_fACEs_ 20 30 60 0.500 66 =VX9= 20 30 60
0.500 66 Watchmen 20 30 60 0.500 69 BOSS Gaming 21 31 63 0.492 69
FAR MMHVMJ 21 31 63 0.492 69 -SOB- 21 31 63 0.492 69 UnrealDown 21
31 63 0.492 69 UPAQ 37-A1 21 31 63 0.492 69 Why So Serious??? 21 31
63 0.492 75 DTG 20 29 60 0.483 76 [NPC] Civilians 21 30 63 0.476 76
Loyalty 21 30 63 0.476 76 Warhorse A 21 30 63 0.476 76 zeus1 21 30
63 0.476 76 Raiders 20 28 60 0.467 81 Friends and Furrs! 21 29 63
0.460 82 _-A-_ 20 27 60 0.450 82 Relentless 20 27 60 0.450 84 Andes
Pride! 20 26 60 0.433 85 sp3ar 21 27 63 0.429 86 DTR 9º 20 25 60
0.417 86 Nueve? el culo te llueve! 20 25 60 0.417 88 DROID Army 20
24 60 0.400 88 Furia 20 24 60 0.400 88 Magically Delicious Tankers
20 24 60 0.400 91 KARMA 19 22 57 0.386 91 -RGA- 19 22 57 0.386 93
LOS BUITRESS 21 24 63 0.381 94 CRRS 20 22 60 0.367 95 Los
Correcaminos de TZAR 19 20 57 0.351 96 RBB 20 21 60 0.350 97 Asado
a la Braza 21 22 63 0.349 97 BANDITS 21 22 63 0.349 97 Oops I did
it again 21 22 63 0.349 100 Happy Casualties 21 21 63 0.333 101
XBBX 19 18 57 0.316 102 Sick Salvation 19 17 57 0.298 103 GRUPO
TACTICO --OMEGA-- 21 18 63 0.286 104 DoomDeath 20 17 60 0.283 104
Killer Khaos 20 17 60 0.283 106 ! CBL 20 16 60 0.267 106 Panzer
Zombie Brigade 20 16 60 0.267 108 Hammerhead 21 16 63 0.254 108
MoonshinersReborn 21 16 63 0.254 108 Nerf hearders 21 16 63 0.254
108 Skullz 21 16 63 0.254 108 The Krew 21 16 63 0.254 113 toasted
steel 21 15 63 0.238 114 Trigger Happy Noobs 20 14 60 0.233 115
Rocha y sus pinitos 21 14 63 0.222 116 Still Angry? 21 13 63 0.206
117 bennybear's shell magnets 20 12 60 0.200 117 TheCarnivalRejects
20 12 60 0.200 119 FENIX 21 12 63 0.190 119 Los Buitres (Tetillones
Peludos) 21 12 63 0.190 121 sticky bombers 19 10 57 0.175 121 IBAD
Team 21 11 63 0.175 123 CAV 20 10 60 0.167 124 Bandaid Big Brawlers
19 9 57 0.158 125 AY CHIQUITA SE VA ENOJAR 20 9 60 0.150 126 2
BLACK EYES 21 9 63 0.143 126 All In 25 CDN 21 9 63 0.143 126
Mr_Gold 21 9 63 0.143 129 *The Kool-Aid Squad* 21 7 63 0.111 130
>I
Subject: T110's Second Summer of Love (And Tolerance)
Link on message: #7843859
CM_Kruger, on Sep 25 2014 - 07:49, said: 
Link on message: #7843859
CM_Kruger, on Sep 25 2014 - 07:49, said: 
The_Chieftain: In fairness, technically hes not holding anything in his
saluting hand and has I think that one can be given a
pass.
Subject: T110's Second Summer of Love (And Tolerance)
Link on message: #7843826
Daigensui, on Sep 25 2014 - 03:48, said:
Slakrrrrrr,
on Sep 24 2014 - 19:42, said: The irony in these two statements is
that the same two questions (with less overexaggeration) could be
asked for your account. This debate began because you decided to
call me "useless in comparison to WG's sources" people who do
take me seriously, who have given you (as of when this response was
written) -24 rep on your first two posts on that thread. As for
your second sentence, when was the last time I came to a conclusion
regarding something that I knew more of than you did? You
are useless, since anything you have WG already has. Furthermore,
you think I give a damn about ignorant people who look at the
consistently incorrect/exaggerated things you put out and agree
with you like how pubbies think Taz is some Proscout? Finally, you
do not know anything more than me when I bother to look into
things (given that I juggle a far larger and heavier load than you
so I need to priortize) and with the French I have, because for the
last week that was a major discussion aside from Italian.
Slakrrrrrr, on Sep 24 2014 - 19:42,
said: I never said I was. All I'm proposing is that Daigensui is
coming to conclusions of her own without referring to higher
notches on the subject (mentioning Souroy for the third time).
You mean your ignoring of the greater access I have to both
Souroy and WG, topping anything you might ever put forward?
Slakrrrrrr, on Sep 24 2014 - 19:42, said: The irony in these two statements is that the same two questions
(with less overexaggeration) could be asked for your account. This
debate began because you decided to call me "useless in comparison
to WG's sources" people who do take me seriously, who have
given you (as of when this response was written) -24 rep on your
first two posts on that thread. As for your second sentence, when
was the last time I came to a conclusion regarding something that I
knew more of than you did?
Slakrrrrrr, on Sep 24 2014 - 19:42, said: I never said I was. All I'm proposing is that Daigensui is coming
to conclusions of her own without referring to higher notches on
the subject (mentioning Souroy for the third time).
Link on message: #7843826
Daigensui, on Sep 25 2014 - 03:48, said:
Slakrrrrrr,
on Sep 24 2014 - 19:42, said: The irony in these two statements is
that the same two questions (with less overexaggeration) could be
asked for your account. This debate began because you decided to
call me "useless in comparison to WG's sources" people who do
take me seriously, who have given you (as of when this response was
written) -24 rep on your first two posts on that thread. As for
your second sentence, when was the last time I came to a conclusion
regarding something that I knew more of than you did? You
are useless, since anything you have WG already has. Furthermore,
you think I give a damn about ignorant people who look at the
consistently incorrect/exaggerated things you put out and agree
with you like how pubbies think Taz is some Proscout? Finally, you
do not know anything more than me when I bother to look into
things (given that I juggle a far larger and heavier load than you
so I need to priortize) and with the French I have, because for the
last week that was a major discussion aside from Italian.
Slakrrrrrr, on Sep 24 2014 - 19:42,
said: I never said I was. All I'm proposing is that Daigensui is
coming to conclusions of her own without referring to higher
notches on the subject (mentioning Souroy for the third time).
You mean your ignoring of the greater access I have to both
Souroy and WG, topping anything you might ever put forward?The_Chieftain: You are useless, since anything you have WG already has.
Furthermore, you think I give a damn about ignorant people who look
at the consistently incorrect/exaggerated things you put out and
agree with you like how pubbies think Taz is some Proscout?
Finally, you do not know anything more than me when I bother
to look into things (given that I juggle a far larger and heavier
load than you so I need to priortize) and with the French I have,
because for the last week that was a major discussion aside from
Italian.
Slakrrrrrr, on Sep 24 2014 - 19:42, said: The irony in these two statements is that the same two questions
(with less overexaggeration) could be asked for your account. This
debate began because you decided to call me "useless in comparison
to WG's sources" people who do take me seriously, who have
given you (as of when this response was written) -24 rep on your
first two posts on that thread. As for your second sentence, when
was the last time I came to a conclusion regarding something that I
knew more of than you did?The_Chieftain: You mean your ignoring of the greater access I have to both
Souroy and WG, topping anything you might ever put forward?
Is this really necessary, Dai? I think we could do with a little
less high horse on this thread, especially when there's only a few
pages left.
Slakrrrrrr, on Sep 24 2014 - 19:42, said: I never said I was. All I'm proposing is that Daigensui is coming
to conclusions of her own without referring to higher notches on
the subject (mentioning Souroy for the third time).The_Chieftain:
Subject: Skirmish 37
Link on message: #7843765
cregberger, on Sep 25 2014 - 08:21, said: Had a team (Andes Pride) that we faced on our group (18 day 3,
regular games) break the tournament rules last night. Both me
(team captain) and a contact player from our team submitted a
replay and screenshot of it. Replay: http://wotreplays.co...153fb18fc94d3b2
Since our team (7th Epic NHL Team of
Urban Decay) is right on the cusp of the top 50% mark, I am hoping
that we submitted all the required info and that Wargaming admin
will have time to look into the situation before tie breaker teams
are set and the final alpha/bravo roster is filled. How
prompt are the responses to a Dispute and does Wargaming normally
give a tech win to the slighted team? Again wouldn't be that
big of a concern, however we are literally this game win away from
being placed in top 50%.
Link on message: #7843765
cregberger, on Sep 25 2014 - 08:21, said: Had a team (Andes Pride) that we faced on our group (18 day 3,
regular games) break the tournament rules last night. Both me
(team captain) and a contact player from our team submitted a
replay and screenshot of it. Replay: http://wotreplays.co...153fb18fc94d3b2
Since our team (7th Epic NHL Team of
Urban Decay) is right on the cusp of the top 50% mark, I am hoping
that we submitted all the required info and that Wargaming admin
will have time to look into the situation before tie breaker teams
are set and the final alpha/bravo roster is filled. How
prompt are the responses to a Dispute and does Wargaming normally
give a tech win to the slighted team? Again wouldn't be that
big of a concern, however we are literally this game win away from
being placed in top 50%.dance210: FYI, posting disputes on the forums is grounds for
getting the dispute ignored.... Saying that, we get to
disputes as quickly as possible. Since we're on the west coast and
I've only been at work less than an hour, it's preferable if you
give us some time to get in and deal with them....or send us a
PM 
Subject: 9.3's New Discipline System
Link on message: #7843716
Link on message: #7843716
Pigeon_of_War: Looks like there is some confusion.
To be more clear, if you have a random disconnection, it's fine. You might get a warning, but it's just that, a warning. Reconnect, and you will be fine. If it's a bigger issue then that, please do send a Tech Support Ticket. If you actually select the "Desert" button, expect a warning with tracking on your account. It's fine if you need to desert every so often, but bear in mind you account is being tracked (like the team damage system I mentioned).
Hope this clarifies things a bit.
To be more clear, if you have a random disconnection, it's fine. You might get a warning, but it's just that, a warning. Reconnect, and you will be fine. If it's a bigger issue then that, please do send a Tech Support Ticket. If you actually select the "Desert" button, expect a warning with tracking on your account. It's fine if you need to desert every so often, but bear in mind you account is being tracked (like the team damage system I mentioned).
Hope this clarifies things a bit.
Subject: Discussion: WGLNA Silver League, Summer 2014
Link on message: #7843631
Shinma_, on Sep 25 2014 - 07:41, said: We never got the additional standings prized in game award :'(
Link on message: #7843631
Shinma_, on Sep 25 2014 - 07:41, said: We never got the additional standings prized in game award :'(
dance210: I know. I'm waiting for the final go ahead that
it can go out. Which should be soon(?).
Subject: 9.3's New Discipline System
Link on message: #7843592
3BAC, on Sep 25 2014 - 08:06, said: It appears the default is "Desert."
Link on message: #7843592
3BAC, on Sep 25 2014 - 08:06, said: It appears the default is "Desert." Pigeon_of_War: The default action is "Cancel". It's highlighted.
Subject: 9.3's New Discipline System
Link on message: #7843453
Shinma_, on Sep 25 2014 - 07:42, said: (hint, spellcheck your thread title)
Link on message: #7843453
Shinma_, on Sep 25 2014 - 07:42, said: (hint, spellcheck your thread title)Pigeon_of_War: Way ahead of you 
Play nice out there!
Play nice out there!
Subject: 9.3's New Discipline System
Link on message: #7843430
Link on message: #7843430
Pigeon_of_War: Hey Tankers! Let's talk about the new inaction/warning system that
is present in 9.3. So, sometimes life happens and you
might need to leave a game early. Bare in mind, you will now be
warned before you officially leave battle.
This sort of action will then
give you another warning once the battle is finished or next time
you log into your client, you will be told that you have a warning
on your account.
Now, I know some of you are
worried right now and are asking a lot of question, such as "What
if I run into a bug?" or "What happens if it's
a disconnect through no fault of my own?"
Don't worry if it's an accident! This new system is in place to keep the system from being taken advantage of, but if you legitimately have an issue then all it amounts to is a small warning. It's just to let you know that your account or yourself disconnected during a match, please don't let it happen again or too many times. Now, if it becomes abusive then actions will be taken against your account, but the system is relatively lenient (think of it like the current team damage system). I hope this addresses some concerns people may encounter about or new Discipline System, and if you have questions, concerns, etc, then let's hear them!
Other than that, see you on the battlefield!
This sort of action will then
give you another warning once the battle is finished or next time
you log into your client, you will be told that you have a warning
on your account.
Now, I know some of you are
worried right now and are asking a lot of question, such as "What
if I run into a bug?" or "What happens if it's
a disconnect through no fault of my own?"Don't worry if it's an accident! This new system is in place to keep the system from being taken advantage of, but if you legitimately have an issue then all it amounts to is a small warning. It's just to let you know that your account or yourself disconnected during a match, please don't let it happen again or too many times. Now, if it becomes abusive then actions will be taken against your account, but the system is relatively lenient (think of it like the current team damage system). I hope this addresses some concerns people may encounter about or new Discipline System, and if you have questions, concerns, etc, then let's hear them!
Other than that, see you on the battlefield!
Subject: 9.3 Issues and Reports
Link on message: #7843140
Link on message: #7843140
Pigeon_of_War: Welcome to the 9.3 update, Tankers! With this update we want
to find out as much about any issues or problems that you run into
while playing. Screenshots and a detailed explanation of the issue
are always appreciated. If you feel it is truly game breaking, do
me a favor and send a Support Ticket so
it can be investigated more thoroughly.
Thanks and see you on the battlefield!
Subject: 9.3 Update is Pending
Link on message: #7843078
Link on message: #7843078
Pigeon_of_War: Hey Mac-based Tankers! With the launch of the 9.3 update,
this means that as per usual, the 9.2 download link will stop
working effective today. We will be posting the updated download
link when it becomes available. The projected availability time is
currently in Early October.
Subject: Atualização 9.3 - Impressões Gerais
Link on message: #7842652
Link on message: #7842652
Capitao_Desastre_: Comandantes,
A atualização 9.3 chegou hoje aos servidores! Um novo ramo de tanques leves Americano, dois novos tanques leves Soviéticos e um novo tanque leve Alemão foram adicionados ao jogo, bem como novas funcionalidades para o modo Fortaleza, novos modelos HD e outras mudanças, Vejam as notas da atualização AQUI.
Durante as próximas semanas, pediria a todos que deixassem aqui neste tópico suas impressões sobre a atualização.
Saudações
A atualização 9.3 chegou hoje aos servidores! Um novo ramo de tanques leves Americano, dois novos tanques leves Soviéticos e um novo tanque leve Alemão foram adicionados ao jogo, bem como novas funcionalidades para o modo Fortaleza, novos modelos HD e outras mudanças, Vejam as notas da atualização AQUI.
Durante as próximas semanas, pediria a todos que deixassem aqui neste tópico suas impressões sobre a atualização.
Saudações
Capitao_Desastre_
Francês Conheça o AMX 65T, Uma outra Camada 9 Pesado. :). E VEJA OS Novo...
25.09.2014 13:53:51
Subject: Francês Conheça o AMX 65T, Uma outra Camada 9 Pesado. :). E VEJA OS Novo...
Link on message: #7842627
joao3dgg, on Sep 24 2014 - 23:53, said: Capitao_Desastre por que tem dados insuficientes dos
tanques franceses?
Link on message: #7842627
joao3dgg, on Sep 24 2014 - 23:53, said: Capitao_Desastre por que tem dados insuficientes dos
tanques franceses? Capitao_Desastre_: Os dados sobre os tanques franceses não são
insuficientes, o problema está no número de veículos para colocar
na árvore. Esse sim é insuficiente.
Subject: Skirmish 37
Link on message: #7841483
blackzaru, on Sep 24 2014 - 19:18, said: Got a tech just a few moments ago, if someone knows if I should
report it, I would like to know, and how to do so.
I'm in team Watchmen, team
NO MERCY did not show up.
Link on message: #7841483
blackzaru, on Sep 24 2014 - 19:18, said: Got a tech just a few moments ago, if someone knows if I should
report it, I would like to know, and how to do so.
I'm in team Watchmen, team
NO MERCY did not show up. dance210: Hi! Tech victories ONLY need to be reported
for the Alpha Playoffs Round of 16 (first night of the playoffs).
Saying that, emails should always be sent to
tournaments@wargamingamerica.com 
Реклама | Adv















