Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: name teams using tanks not allowed in skirmishes
Link on message: #10017030
Cent72, on Apr 07 2016 - 05:10, said: I remember in skirmishes a while ago, we brought 2 of the
same tank which was not allowed and we tech lost the battle. How
come WG does not code a check like this into the game anymore?
Link on message: #10017030
Cent72, on Apr 07 2016 - 05:10, said: I remember in skirmishes a while ago, we brought 2 of the
same tank which was not allowed and we tech lost the battle. How
come WG does not code a check like this into the game anymore?dance210: If you tech lost, it wasn't because you brought duplicated
tanks; that kind of check isn't built into our tournament system.
We keep asking to be allowed to control the special restrictions,
but no luck so far 
Subject: name teams using tanks not allowed in skirmishes
Link on message: #10016806
R__E__C__O__N, on Apr 07 2016 - 03:35, said: WG hides the fact that people cheat rather than adverrise it
and the punishmwnt to deter it. I use 1 chaffe ur dis
qualified from the entire tourney but all WG will do is disqualify them from that 1 battle.
Link on message: #10016806
R__E__C__O__N, on Apr 07 2016 - 03:35, said: WG hides the fact that people cheat rather than adverrise it
and the punishmwnt to deter it. I use 1 chaffe ur disqualified from the entire tourney but all WG will do is disqualify them from that 1 battle.
dance210: Not true. Teams are three reports of rule breaking. Once I receive
the third report against a team, all points are removed from that
team for the Group Stage. For the playoffs, all it takes is the
report from one battle and they are DQ'd and do not move on to the
next round.
Subject: name teams using tanks not allowed in skirmishes
Link on message: #10016805
doctor_no, on Apr 07 2016 - 03:32, said: for the second time this week in skirmish Xlll-on murovanka, we
have encountered teams that are using tanks that are not allowed in
this skirmish. we have sent in the replays to wot. they are
using chaffe's that are not allowed. They have also won about
50% of their battles using the 4 chaffee's. Should we be able
to name them so that other teams will be aware of this?
Link on message: #10016805
doctor_no, on Apr 07 2016 - 03:32, said: for the second time this week in skirmish Xlll-on murovanka, we
have encountered teams that are using tanks that are not allowed in
this skirmish. we have sent in the replays to wot. they are
using chaffe's that are not allowed. They have also won about
50% of their battles using the 4 chaffee's. Should we be able
to name them so that other teams will be aware of this?dance210: Not if you want your dispute to be dealt with once I get
back in the office on Monday 
Subject: The Chieftain's Random Musings Thread
Link on message: #10016381
Link on message: #10016381
The_Chieftain: Of interest. https://www.reddit.c...wwii_tanker_of/
Subject: Beware the Ides of T110.
Link on message: #10016297
Link on message: #10016297
The_Chieftain: The WT video may be down on their YouTube page, but it's still up
on the FB page where, to be fair, a number of WT users are stating
their objections.
Subject: The Wonderful World of Yoh
Link on message: #10016240
therowman, on Feb 02 2013 - 12:54, said: Premium tank please.
Link on message: #10016240
therowman, on Feb 02 2013 - 12:54, said: Premium tank please.Pigeon_of_War: Hmmmm......I have some calls to make...
Subject: Skirmish XIV
Link on message: #10016204
Agentt_Orange, on Apr 05 2016 - 15:23, said: So..... Are the days of weekend tournament teams
gone?? The current Skirmish XIII and, now the current,
Skirmish XIV are week long with no weekend teams. Is it just
for the anniversary?
Viper069, on Apr 06 2016 - 12:27, said: This is a very good question. Has it been answered
somewhere else, or is it just being ignored?
Davidsray, on Apr 06 2016 - 12:51, said: Yes a very good question, we compete every weekend . . . I hope the
weekend part is not gone Has it been answered somewhere else,
or is it just being ignored?
Link on message: #10016204
Agentt_Orange, on Apr 05 2016 - 15:23, said: So..... Are the days of weekend tournament teams
gone?? The current Skirmish XIII and, now the current,
Skirmish XIV are week long with no weekend teams. Is it just
for the anniversary?dance210:
Viper069, on Apr 06 2016 - 12:27, said: This is a very good question. Has it been answered
somewhere else, or is it just being ignored?dance210:
Davidsray, on Apr 06 2016 - 12:51, said: Yes a very good question, we compete every weekend . . . I hope the
weekend part is not gone Has it been answered somewhere else,
or is it just being ignored? dance210: Yes and no. With the new tournament system, teams need to
register for the weekend by Monday. Those three extra days to
register were good - it allowed people to sign up until right
before the tournament. I decided to remove the weekend
version from the Skirmish. Going forward, likely starting from the
week Skirmish XV happens, there will be a separate weekend only
tournament. This will let players who want to play in a tournament
participate, and it will also give them back the extended
registration right up to the tournament start date.
Subject: Operation temporarily unavailable. WHY!?!?!?!
Link on message: #10016192
BUNNYHUGGERI, on Apr 06 2016 - 18:13, said: http://forum.worldof...navailable-why/
Help with Tourney? Not sure why I can not join
the team? Any idea?
Link on message: #10016192
BUNNYHUGGERI, on Apr 06 2016 - 18:13, said: http://forum.worldof...navailable-why/
Help with Tourney? Not sure why I can not join
the team? Any idea?dance210: Hi! As Cent said, you can try a different browser
window or wait a bit and come back later. You can also try Ctrl+R
to force reload the page. If that doesn't work, feel free to email
tournaments@wargamingamerica.com with the name of the team you are
trying to join and your in-game name. The error normally
seems to pop up when the page is trying to refresh date (e.g.
especially when it's calculating match scores), although it happens
other times. It also seems to have a long cache, which is why the
reload will sometimes work. Good luck!
Subject: The Wonderful World of Yoh
Link on message: #10016116
Link on message: #10016116
The_Chieftain: MBT-70 is probably what you're thinking of, though there were other
such designs, like Object 416.
Subject: SPECIAL missions 2 get female crew members
Link on message: #10015860
Link on message: #10015860
GhostPrime: Topic Locked. Posting about social, religious, political,
illegal or other controversial topics
Subject: Os Representantes Europeus das Grandes Finais
Link on message: #10015812
Link on message: #10015812
Content_WG: Tornado Rox e Wombats on Tanks da Europa avançam para o torneio do
campeonato.
Texto completo da notícia
Texto completo da notícia
Subject: Victor Kislyi Talks Future of World of Tanks
Link on message: #10014868
SolidSoldat, on Apr 06 2016 - 10:11, said: BTW, is it possible to see the full/extended version if there
is one, there were a lot of people in that room, and we didn't
get to hear their questions.
Link on message: #10014868
SolidSoldat, on Apr 06 2016 - 10:11, said: BTW, is it possible to see the full/extended version if there
is one, there were a lot of people in that room, and we didn't
get to hear their questions. GhostPrime: Yes! It is possible! Short video: https://youtu.be/gGhKfkuJ0OQ Long
Video: https://youtu.be/8_b-06SQBj8
Subject: Fisherman's Bay freezing issue.
Link on message: #10014757
Link on message: #10014757
GhostPrime: What GPUs are you all running? have you sent tickets into support
about the issue?
Subject: Operación Tifón: Reglas y Regulaciones
Link on message: #10014718
Link on message: #10014718
Content_WG: Detalles sobre este evento del Mapa Global.
Texto completo de las noticias
Texto completo de las noticias
Subject: Regras e Regulamentos da "Operação Furacão" da Guerra de Clãs
Link on message: #10014714
Link on message: #10014714
Content_WG: Detalhes sobre este evento do Mapa Global.
Texto completo da notícia
Texto completo da notícia
Subject: Clan Wars' "Operation Typhoon" Rules and Regs
Link on message: #10014713
Link on message: #10014713
Content_WG: Details on this Global Map event.
Full news text
Full news text
Subject: Beware the Ides of T110.
Link on message: #10014184
Guy4123, on Apr 06 2016 - 09:52, said: Sounds like a spot of light drizzle ma'am.
Link on message: #10014184
Guy4123, on Apr 06 2016 - 09:52, said: Sounds like a spot of light drizzle ma'am. The_Chieftain: We have what in Ireland is called a "Soft day". Most parts
of the world would call it "Grey and miserable"
Subject: The Chieftain's Hatch: German Tactics, as Told by the USSR
Link on message: #10014174
mrmojo, on Apr 06 2016 - 03:38, said: Agreed. Interesting article, an excerpt from
"Krasnaya Zvezda (Russian: Кра́сная звезда́, literally "Red Star"
is an official newspaper of Soviet and later Russian Ministry of
Defence" I thought it was unbiased, lacked any form of
propaganda (which could be forgiven given it's context) and gave a
real insight into tactics of both sides. I enjoyed it.
Link on message: #10014174
mrmojo, on Apr 06 2016 - 03:38, said: Agreed. Interesting article, an excerpt from
"Krasnaya Zvezda (Russian: Кра́сная звезда́, literally "Red Star"
is an official newspaper of Soviet and later Russian Ministry of
Defence" I thought it was unbiased, lacked any form of
propaganda (which could be forgiven given it's context) and gave a
real insight into tactics of both sides. I enjoyed it. The_Chieftain: That was pretty much my conclusion as well. It's almost like
the sort of article which, in the US, would be found in "Infantry
Journal" as opposed to Stars and Stripes. Surprising, and pleasing
both. I wonder if Red Star still does the same thing, or if
it's evolved since?
Subject: Skirmish XIII - Road to the Grand Finals!
Link on message: #10014027
RetroMan55, on Apr 05 2016 - 13:36, said: We ran into a Top 20% team running 4 Chaffees, and another team
running a Chaffee and an AMC ELC. Won one, lost one.
Filed a dispute even though it said report a dispute at the end of
the round. With less than 2 minutes between rounds, and quite
a list of "requirements" to email a dispute in, it took this old
guy more like a half hour to do so. Did it anyway at the end
of the battles. Amazing how hard they have made it to report
cheaters and people who can't read simple rules. No response
as yet. Next day, 3:30 PM Central.
Link on message: #10014027
RetroMan55, on Apr 05 2016 - 13:36, said: We ran into a Top 20% team running 4 Chaffees, and another team
running a Chaffee and an AMC ELC. Won one, lost one.
Filed a dispute even though it said report a dispute at the end of
the round. With less than 2 minutes between rounds, and quite
a list of "requirements" to email a dispute in, it took this old
guy more like a half hour to do so. Did it anyway at the end
of the battles. Amazing how hard they have made it to report
cheaters and people who can't read simple rules. No response
as yet. Next day, 3:30 PM Central.dance210: Hi! You likely won't hear a response for a few more
days. We are all in Poland for the Grand Finals. When I have free
time I will try doing some, but no promises that anything will be
done before next Monday 
Subject: What happened to Stand To's
Link on message: #10014013
Jer1413, on Apr 06 2016 - 06:28, said: I don't see any Stand To's listed for the next day or two. Are they
being scrapped?
Link on message: #10014013
Jer1413, on Apr 06 2016 - 06:28, said: I don't see any Stand To's listed for the next day or two. Are they
being scrapped?dance210: The eSports staff is all in Poland for the Grand Finals.
Unfortunately, that means that we won't be able to run a daily
tournament like the Stand-To. Don't worry though, they will be
returning again starting next Monday!
Subject: So about the LeKP M41 90mm GF in-game model
Link on message: #10013660
americankraut, on Apr 06 2016 - 12:00, said: A better question is why replace the 50 cal if the tank came with
one?
Link on message: #10013660
americankraut, on Apr 06 2016 - 12:00, said: A better question is why replace the 50 cal if the tank came with
one?Lert: Ammunition availability, unification of supplies,
eliminating an ammunition type not native to germany? Just taking a
stab in the dark. They replaced the main gun with their own one, so
why not the far more easily removed roof-mounted MG? As I
said, it wasn't an issue, I was just curious.
Subject: So about the LeKP M41 90mm GF in-game model
Link on message: #10013639
Link on message: #10013639
Lert: It wasn't really an issue, just me being curious as to why there's
an M2 instead of an MG3 on the in-game model. I'm going to
Munster in a few months, so I'll be able to look at it up close.
Subject: So about the LeKP M41 90mm GF in-game model
Link on message: #10013584
Link on message: #10013584
Lert: Eh, that's just a skin / texture. The MG was actually modeled. For
the regular Bulldog, but still. They could've copy-pasted
the Kanonenjagdpanzer's MG3 onto the LeKP model if they wanted to,
so I'm wanting to know why they kept the ,50 cal HMG. Was it
an oversight? Was it a conscious choice? Do they have information
suggesting the germans actually used the M2 instead of MG3? Or did
they just not care and wanted a quick-and-diry retexture to put
into the game? The model's changes to the gun mantlet and gun
suggest they actually put some effort into this premie, so why not
simply swap the Ma Deuce for the MG3 from Kanonenjagdpanzer?
Subject: So about the LeKP M41 90mm GF in-game model
Link on message: #10013567
Link on message: #10013567
Lert: Later, sure. Got my actually-being-productive-during-the-day things
to do for now.
Subject: So about the LeKP M41 90mm GF in-game model
Link on message: #10013563
_Tsavo_, on Apr 06 2016 - 11:19, said: I give it to ya and in less than a day yer nitpicking it D:
Link on message: #10013563
_Tsavo_, on Apr 06 2016 - 11:19, said: I give it to ya and in less than a day yer nitpicking it D:Lert: And I am still very grateful. Dropped my only full female
crew in it, even. It's their dedicated ride now.
Subject: So about the LeKP M41 90mm GF in-game model
Link on message: #10013542
Link on message: #10013542
Lert: The M41 90mm GF in-game model sports ye olde Ma Deuce on the turret
roof, but did german tanks of the period actually carry that gun? I
was under the impression an MG3 would've been more likely as
roof-mounted MG on tanks in german service during the time the LeKP
M41 served. Edumacate a Lert on this, oh wise and
knowledgable people* *In case you are neither wise nor
knowledgeable, feel free to admit this to yourself, like I did
concerning this subject.
Subject: The Chieftain's Hatch: German Tactics, as Told by the USSR
Link on message: #10012843
Link on message: #10012843
The_Chieftain: OK, Manic. Fun's over. Constructive/mature posts only from this
point on, please.
Subject: The Chieftain's Hatch: German Tactics, as Told by the USSR
Link on message: #10012674
ManicDVLN, on Apr 06 2016 - 01:22, said: Yeah cause Soviet Russia, a country WHO COULDN'T EVEN FEED
ITS OWN PEOPLE AND UNDERSTAND BASIC CONCEPTS OF AGRICULTURE SOMEHOW
HAVE OUTSMARTED GERMAN ARMY. MORON. RUSSIAN BASIC STRATEGY
WAS GO FORWARD OR WE WILL SHOOT ANYONE WHO RETREATS. TALK ABOUT
MORALE!
Link on message: #10012674
ManicDVLN, on Apr 06 2016 - 01:22, said: Yeah cause Soviet Russia, a country WHO COULDN'T EVEN FEED
ITS OWN PEOPLE AND UNDERSTAND BASIC CONCEPTS OF AGRICULTURE SOMEHOW
HAVE OUTSMARTED GERMAN ARMY. MORON. RUSSIAN BASIC STRATEGY
WAS GO FORWARD OR WE WILL SHOOT ANYONE WHO RETREATS. TALK ABOUT
MORALE!The_Chieftain: Not that it's the point of this thread, but the Soviet
soldiers in Berlin seem to indicate that it worked, didn't
it?
Subject: Japanese Tank Destroyer Brach Proposition
Link on message: #10012610
Link on message: #10012610
Pigeon_of_War: I dunno, I actually liked reading this. It's a decent
list of interesting tanks.
Subject: Removal of Rampage Mode
Link on message: #10012503
Link on message: #10012503
GhostPrime: If anyone encounters any violation of the game rules while in the
Rampage game mode please submit a ticket to
support, with a replay attached to the ticket.
With the information that you provide us, we will perform an investigation and take the appropriate actions. Due to our privacy policy, we cannot inform players as to what action may or may not be taken against the player(s) in question.
However we assure you that our investigations are exhaustive and that any violation of the game rules will be met with account sanctions.
With the information that you provide us, we will perform an investigation and take the appropriate actions. Due to our privacy policy, we cannot inform players as to what action may or may not be taken against the player(s) in question.
However we assure you that our investigations are exhaustive and that any violation of the game rules will be met with account sanctions.
Subject: April 5 Champions Broadcasts
Link on message: #10012422
blackzaru, on Apr 05 2016 - 13:32, said: We are April 5th, not 4.
Link on message: #10012422
blackzaru, on Apr 05 2016 - 13:32, said: We are April 5th, not 4.veganzombiez: gj u past the eyecheck test zaru
Subject: Where did she go?
Link on message: #10012153
Link on message: #10012153
The_Chieftain: I'm pretty sure she's in Fort Benning right now.
Subject: Most unusual tank we probably won't see on WOT
Link on message: #10012137
Blackhorse_Six, on Apr 05 2016 - 16:14, said: As I recall, the STRV 103 S is planned for in the Swedish tech tree
- which will probably arrive before the Italian tree. You'll
have to search-thru the Comfort Thread to find those discussions,
and The_Chieftain was a source ...
Link on message: #10012137
Blackhorse_Six, on Apr 05 2016 - 16:14, said: As I recall, the STRV 103 S is planned for in the Swedish tech tree
- which will probably arrive before the Italian tree. You'll
have to search-thru the Comfort Thread to find those discussions,
and The_Chieftain was a source ...The_Chieftain: Very old, though. The Swedish tanks are so far in the
distance, they're not even on my radar any more.
Subject: Japanese Tank Destroyer Brach Proposition
Link on message: #10012135
Link on message: #10012135
The_Chieftain: There are a few you missed for consideration. For example, the
Ho-Ri you show is Ho-Ri I. Ho-Ri II is more of a Jagtiger design
with a central casemate. The Ka-To would likely want to down-tier.
However, the Japanese TDs are sufficiently low a priority that we
haven't even uploaded resources into our art/plans database.
Subject: April 4 Champions Broadcasts
Link on message: #10012062
Link on message: #10012062
veganzombiez: 1700 PT MAHOU vs OTTER ezgames (Twitch) +
sheller3 (Twitch) 1800
PT APLUS vs SIMP Inchon (Twitch) + Ledif Current standings.
Subject: Los Grand Finals: Guía del Espectador
Link on message: #10012036
Link on message: #10012036
Content_WG: ¡Todo lo que necesitas saber sobre el torneo de eSports con premios
de $300.000!
Texto completo de las noticias
Texto completo de las noticias
Subject: Guia de Espectador das Grandes Finais
Link on message: #10012034
Link on message: #10012034
Content_WG: Tudo que você precisa saber sobre nosso torneio de eSports com
prêmios de $300.000!
Texto completo da notícia
Texto completo da notícia
Subject: The Grand Finals Viewers' Guide
Link on message: #10012033
Link on message: #10012033
Content_WG: Everything you need to know about our $300,000 eSports
tournament!
Full news text
Full news text
Subject: Beware the Ides of T110.
Link on message: #10011967
EmpressNero, on Apr 05 2016 - 12:54, said: So who's the Ratfink who has been reporting stuff in
here? You should be able to answer that.
Link on message: #10011967
EmpressNero, on Apr 05 2016 - 12:54, said: So who's the Ratfink who has been reporting stuff in
here? You should be able to answer that.Pigeon_of_War: You presume too much.
Subject: Beware the Ides of T110.
Link on message: #10011950
EmpressNero, on Apr 05 2016 - 12:40, said: By the way, why is this just becoming an issue NOW? This
thread has been around for three freaking years and has always been
a gray area made safe by The_Chieftain (blessings and peace be upon
him). If you're going to suddenly crack down after three
years, you want to give a better explanation then "powerful people
are watching". Who exactly are these "powerful people", and
why do they suddenly care now when they didn't last year, or the
year before, or the year before?
Link on message: #10011950
EmpressNero, on Apr 05 2016 - 12:40, said: By the way, why is this just becoming an issue NOW? This
thread has been around for three freaking years and has always been
a gray area made safe by The_Chieftain (blessings and peace be upon
him). If you're going to suddenly crack down after three
years, you want to give a better explanation then "powerful people
are watching". Who exactly are these "powerful people", and
why do they suddenly care now when they didn't last year, or the
year before, or the year before?Pigeon_of_War: It's something that's always been noticed, but some things
just got hit in the thread a couple of times. I doubt it's anything
major and the "thread" is really safe for the most part. Egregious
stuff does get brought up though.
Реклама | Adv















