Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
eekeeboo
My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
03.01.2019 12:00:42
Subject: My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
Link on message: #16515408
psychobear, on 02 January 2019 - 08:40 PM, said: Fair enough, how about setting the record straight by
providing a playerbase-wide in-game survey, just to see how many
want it in the game and how many don't. Then we could talk numbers,
instead of empty assumptions. As for how many artillery
players are there, that's a seriously skewed premise if you assume
that everyone who plays arta or has it in the garage is an arty
player and wants it in the game. I, for example, have 3 arties in
the garage, i went through the american line grind to tier 9, yet i
would be more than happy too see it all removed with no
compensation at all. But hey, according to WG's data, i am an arty
player and just by that alone you assume i also like it and want it
in the game. You guys are seriously off, if that's how you
analyze your data.
Szatanshow, on 02 January 2019 - 09:34 PM, said: Just made a 1 month test instead of empty words about arty WG One
month with 1 server with NO ARTY - just make sure it can handle 99%
of population of both servers combined since it will be stormed in
seconds after opening But WG will never do it since they will never
admit they have no clue about their game and as always they dont
listen to EU feedback all they want is to milk EU cows If 2019
changes wont be revolutionize for wot many ppl will leave the game
even faster than they do now ps. And it wont be since
WG: keeps saying superhevies dont need weekspots Arty still in
the be in game -toxicity influence nr 1 XVM - no actions to
toxicity influence nr 2 They blindly defent 3/5/7 and want to add
two more 3/5/7 like templates intstead of giving us +1mm
Bonus: Make EU servers development to EU team(make a new
one) disconected from RU (like Asia) so they (RU) can have
they ufojects as op as they want.
LordMuffin, on 02 January 2019 - 10:30 PM, said: Wishlist 2019.
1: Removal of template MM and reintroduction of the MM prior to it.
2: Removal of stun from arty.
3: Rebalance of all tanks back to values they had during E5s heydays (including reversal of light tank change).
4: Reverse of Obj 261 line.
5: Serious nerf to Defender, IS-3A (make gun Italian autoreloader type), nerf to VK100P and Mauschen, nerf to 5A, nerf to Obj 267, nerf to Obj 430 and Obj 430U, nerf to Obj 907, nerf to T95 and Badger and T28, T67, KV-1S, T29, Patriot, Liberte, Skorpion G, Cent 5/1, Strv 81, ELC EVEN 90, Super Conqueror and maybe some more.
Gun changes: FV4005, JgPzE100, FV215B 183.
Removal of Japanese heavies.
Buff: Tiger P, Tiger II, Indien Pz, Leo PTA, Leopard, AT 7, T25/2, T32, M103, IS-4, KV-4, KV-3, SU-122-54, SU-100M1, SU-101, Obj 268, VK 30 02D (T7 German medium), A-44, TVP VTU, T-34-2, Type T-34, KV-13, Churchill I, Churchill VII, Black Prince, Centurion I, 110, 121, MA3E2, M4A3E8. Removal of Premium ammo and adding of weakspots to all tanks lacking these, frontal weakspots that can be penned by the lowest tiered tank it meets (excluding light tanks).
This should be a good start.
Though it have 0 probability of happening.
Link on message: #16515408
psychobear, on 02 January 2019 - 08:40 PM, said: Fair enough, how about setting the record straight by
providing a playerbase-wide in-game survey, just to see how many
want it in the game and how many don't. Then we could talk numbers,
instead of empty assumptions. As for how many artillery
players are there, that's a seriously skewed premise if you assume
that everyone who plays arta or has it in the garage is an arty
player and wants it in the game. I, for example, have 3 arties in
the garage, i went through the american line grind to tier 9, yet i
would be more than happy too see it all removed with no
compensation at all. But hey, according to WG's data, i am an arty
player and just by that alone you assume i also like it and want it
in the game. You guys are seriously off, if that's how you
analyze your data.eekeeboo: It's not just about who wants it in the game, there was an
instance in the past I remember where during a QnA it was brought
up that most top-level players dislike arty (for obvious
reasons), but all of them were found to use artillery in clan wars
etc. That's the difference. A person who plays artillery to get to
the next tank or to get to tier 10, playing it just enough, vs a
player who plays it repeatedly and all the time.
That's the point of data, there's no bias or trying to find the
answer you want (good data analysis) it's just getting an
answer.
Szatanshow, on 02 January 2019 - 09:34 PM, said: Just made a 1 month test instead of empty words about arty WG One
month with 1 server with NO ARTY - just make sure it can handle 99%
of population of both servers combined since it will be stormed in
seconds after opening But WG will never do it since they will never
admit they have no clue about their game and as always they dont
listen to EU feedback all they want is to milk EU cows If 2019
changes wont be revolutionize for wot many ppl will leave the game
even faster than they do now ps. And it wont be since
WG: keeps saying superhevies dont need weekspots Arty still in
the be in game -toxicity influence nr 1 XVM - no actions to
toxicity influence nr 2 They blindly defent 3/5/7 and want to add
two more 3/5/7 like templates intstead of giving us +1mm
Bonus: Make EU servers development to EU team(make a new
one) disconected from RU (like Asia) so they (RU) can have
they ufojects as op as they want. eekeeboo: Having no clue about the game and the players, still alive
and kicking after all these years. There are contradictions and
bias in your statement, something you need to address if you want
to help achieve what you want. From your list alone, xvm, do you
understand how the application works? The benefits vs downsides? -
I personally don't like having statistics visible in battle, I
appreciate them outside of battle, but at the same time they can
also help a person spectate a "better" player and quite probably
learn something to improve their game. Will this work for everyone?
No, nor will it be how everyone uses it, but even 1 player
improving is good.
LordMuffin, on 02 January 2019 - 10:30 PM, said: Wishlist 2019.1: Removal of template MM and reintroduction of the MM prior to it.
2: Removal of stun from arty.
3: Rebalance of all tanks back to values they had during E5s heydays (including reversal of light tank change).
4: Reverse of Obj 261 line.
5: Serious nerf to Defender, IS-3A (make gun Italian autoreloader type), nerf to VK100P and Mauschen, nerf to 5A, nerf to Obj 267, nerf to Obj 430 and Obj 430U, nerf to Obj 907, nerf to T95 and Badger and T28, T67, KV-1S, T29, Patriot, Liberte, Skorpion G, Cent 5/1, Strv 81, ELC EVEN 90, Super Conqueror and maybe some more.
Gun changes: FV4005, JgPzE100, FV215B 183.
Removal of Japanese heavies.
Buff: Tiger P, Tiger II, Indien Pz, Leo PTA, Leopard, AT 7, T25/2, T32, M103, IS-4, KV-4, KV-3, SU-122-54, SU-100M1, SU-101, Obj 268, VK 30 02D (T7 German medium), A-44, TVP VTU, T-34-2, Type T-34, KV-13, Churchill I, Churchill VII, Black Prince, Centurion I, 110, 121, MA3E2, M4A3E8. Removal of Premium ammo and adding of weakspots to all tanks lacking these, frontal weakspots that can be penned by the lowest tiered tank it meets (excluding light tanks).
This should be a good start.
Though it have 0 probability of happening.
eekeeboo: I hope you don't mean the E5 with super invincicupola!
eekeeboo
A "fair" question.
02.01.2019 20:17:00
Subject: A "fair" question.
Link on message: #16513998
panter22, on 02 January 2019 - 06:06 PM, said: just tell him it is p2w and that is it 
Link on message: #16513998
panter22, on 02 January 2019 - 06:06 PM, said: just tell him it is p2w and that is it eekeeboo: How so? Some tanks have APCR as standard which generally
travel faster than AP rounds that are special ammo.
eekeeboo
PLease take Highway back out of the game
02.01.2019 20:13:47
Subject: PLease take Highway back out of the game
Link on message: #16513983
Ceeb, on 02 January 2019 - 06:12 PM, said: All I've read here is WG don't listen or are blinkered.
The fact maps like Mines and Ensk have been discussed for
years seems irrelevant
Link on message: #16513983
Ceeb, on 02 January 2019 - 06:12 PM, said: All I've read here is WG don't listen or are blinkered.
The fact maps like Mines and Ensk have been discussed for
years seems irrelevant eekeeboo: It may be important for you to read more carefully the
things stated here. It will help not only right now, but in the
future too.
eekeeboo
PLease take Highway back out of the game
02.01.2019 20:05:30
Subject: PLease take Highway back out of the game
Link on message: #16513956
divsmo, on 02 January 2019 - 05:01 PM, said: But surely you can only take the opinions of those people that
voice one?. Unless you send in game surveys out to every
active player asking about rebalancing maps to suitable
tiers? I mean my clan has 2 active members using these
forums, but i know from using teamspeak and chatting to all the
other members that at least 90% believe maps like mines and ensk
should either be limited like widepark to tier 6 or updated to
be made larger. It's not as though WG has made a particular
effort to engage with the playerbase or else we wouldn't have seen
some of the changes to the game that have made it worse rather than
better.
Sfinski, on 02 January 2019 - 05:04 PM, said: You do realize that even if the map plays statistically
balanced etc. has no meaning if it's good or bad. The map is shiet.
You will see it when blacklisting maps will come into the game and
see most turn it off.
Link on message: #16513956
divsmo, on 02 January 2019 - 05:01 PM, said: But surely you can only take the opinions of those people that
voice one?. Unless you send in game surveys out to every
active player asking about rebalancing maps to suitable
tiers? I mean my clan has 2 active members using these
forums, but i know from using teamspeak and chatting to all the
other members that at least 90% believe maps like mines and ensk
should either be limited like widepark to tier 6 or updated to
be made larger. It's not as though WG has made a particular
effort to engage with the playerbase or else we wouldn't have seen
some of the changes to the game that have made it worse rather than
better.eekeeboo: This is true, and that's why it's important to use more than
just opinions from a select % of the player base. Generally
speaking, you don't have happy excited people wanting to share good
things on the forums, that's just how the forums are. That's why
data is used just as much to test how balanced or imbalanced a map
is. There are surveys and opinions gathered on maps throughout the
time of map analysis too. And one persons worse, is another persons
awesome.
Sfinski, on 02 January 2019 - 05:04 PM, said: You do realize that even if the map plays statistically
balanced etc. has no meaning if it's good or bad. The map is shiet.
You will see it when blacklisting maps will come into the game and
see most turn it off.eekeeboo: That's true, but a player not liking or disliking doesn't
make a map good or bad either. That's why a lot of sources of
information are important. Generally heavy tank players love maps
that light tank players hate. Arty players will hate city maps with
a passion but love open maps etc.
Delhroh
Sanciones
02.01.2019 20:01:53
Delhroh
[Tier X] T-100 LT
02.01.2019 20:00:46
Subject: [Tier X] T-100 LT
Link on message: #16513944
Link on message: #16513944
Delhroh: Si hay alguien interesado en escribir algo más, adelante, el foro
es vuestro. Puedo editar el mensaje y listo con la información que
queráis aportar 
. Un saludo.
. Un saludo.Delhroh
Preguntas/Respuestas del Staff (Especiales, Tienda Premium...)
02.01.2019 19:59:47
Subject: Preguntas/Respuestas del Staff (Especiales, Tienda Premium...)
Link on message: #16513938
Sargento_Duke, on 02 January 2019 - 02:11 PM, said: No se si va aquí esto. ¿Pero van a arreglar alguna
vez del PanzerIII-K después de dos años? Ha sido larga la
espera para poder comprarlo, y que todos los panzerIII del juego
cojan minimo 50/-20kmh (desde el vk2001 a los su76/85i) y este sea
tan lento como un Stug… (que es distinto al panzerIII, puede
PIVOTAR) y es que los PanzerIII-E y J pasan de 60kmh. Me
esperaba alguna especie de Cromwell-B y me he encontrado un Tier4
con mucha vida y un tier mas. Por mi como si a cambio de
darle la velocidad del PanzerIII lo suben a tier6, pero ahora es
injugable, no por el cañon y blindaje de tier4, la velocidad de
caracol termina de matarlo. Pensaba que tras lo poco que se
ha vendido lo balancearían ¿hay algo previsto? desde luego se
vendería cuando lo sacasen. Salu2.
Link on message: #16513938
Sargento_Duke, on 02 January 2019 - 02:11 PM, said: No se si va aquí esto. ¿Pero van a arreglar alguna
vez del PanzerIII-K después de dos años? Ha sido larga la
espera para poder comprarlo, y que todos los panzerIII del juego
cojan minimo 50/-20kmh (desde el vk2001 a los su76/85i) y este sea
tan lento como un Stug… (que es distinto al panzerIII, puede
PIVOTAR) y es que los PanzerIII-E y J pasan de 60kmh. Me
esperaba alguna especie de Cromwell-B y me he encontrado un Tier4
con mucha vida y un tier mas. Por mi como si a cambio de
darle la velocidad del PanzerIII lo suben a tier6, pero ahora es
injugable, no por el cañon y blindaje de tier4, la velocidad de
caracol termina de matarlo. Pensaba que tras lo poco que se
ha vendido lo balancearían ¿hay algo previsto? desde luego se
vendería cuando lo sacasen. Salu2.Delhroh: Hola, Por lo que sé hay previsto un rebalanceo
completo de la rama alemana, pero no tengo más detalles que poder
compartir ahora mismo. Un saludo.
eekeeboo
Skorpion G vs. SU-130PM
02.01.2019 19:19:04
Subject: Skorpion G vs. SU-130PM
Link on message: #16513814
RagingRaptor, on 02 January 2019 - 02:17 PM, said: Grille 15 wants to have a word with you
Link on message: #16513814
RagingRaptor, on 02 January 2019 - 02:17 PM, said: Grille 15 wants to have a word with you eekeeboo: 
thePhilX
Update: Bollwerkgefechte Zeitplan während der Feiertage
02.01.2019 18:52:52
Subject: Update: Bollwerkgefechte Zeitplan während der Feiertage
Link on message: #16513691
Getaro, on 02 January 2019 - 01:34 PM, said: Ich finde es sehr positiv das die Zeiten verlängert wurden
Link on message: #16513691
Getaro, on 02 January 2019 - 01:34 PM, said: Ich finde es sehr positiv das die Zeiten verlängert wurdenthePhilX: Hey,
habt ihr das Gefühl, dass auch in den letzten Stunden (ab 01:00 Uhr) die Wartezeiten angemessen bleiben?
habt ihr das Gefühl, dass auch in den letzten Stunden (ab 01:00 Uhr) die Wartezeiten angemessen bleiben?
eekeeboo
My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
02.01.2019 18:52:25
Subject: My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
Link on message: #16513690
Elua, on 02 January 2019 - 04:23 PM, said: This announces terrifies me. They shows Wargaming not want
solve 3 biggest WoT problems: 1. Artillery in game - I don't
ask for removal I ask for reasonable option to join battles without
it. And for god sake plz stop making campaigns and events promoting
arty usage. 2. XVM stats in game - 2'nd source for toxicity in WoT
- I demand ( like WoW-s have ) option to hide my stats, my name and
clan in battle. XVM stats mod is unfair advantage and VERY toxic 3.
OP premium tanks balance : heavy nerfs ( T-22 style nerfs ) are
needed is you want be seen like fair, not P2W game developer.
But not single world about it in this crap announces. Focus
guys, time is ticking and WoT bleeds playerbase....
Link on message: #16513690
Elua, on 02 January 2019 - 04:23 PM, said: This announces terrifies me. They shows Wargaming not want
solve 3 biggest WoT problems: 1. Artillery in game - I don't
ask for removal I ask for reasonable option to join battles without
it. And for god sake plz stop making campaigns and events promoting
arty usage. 2. XVM stats in game - 2'nd source for toxicity in WoT
- I demand ( like WoW-s have ) option to hide my stats, my name and
clan in battle. XVM stats mod is unfair advantage and VERY toxic 3.
OP premium tanks balance : heavy nerfs ( T-22 style nerfs ) are
needed is you want be seen like fair, not P2W game developer.
But not single world about it in this crap announces. Focus
guys, time is ticking and WoT bleeds playerbase....eekeeboo: Artillery is something you don't like and many others who
don't. But there are many players who do and many artillery
players. There are constant reviews, changes and updates to
artillery made over the course of the game. XVM.... this is
not WG, WG is not responsible. The ability to hide statistics
could/would limit far more things like statistics measuring
websites etc. Tank balancing takes place using data and
imbalanced analysis. There are plenty of tech tree tanks that are
considered OP and aren't P2W. No matter what you do or how much you
nerf, there will always be something OP and something UP that's how
meta changes and balancing works.
eekeeboo
My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
02.01.2019 18:49:44
Subject: My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
Link on message: #16513677
HussarKaz, on 02 January 2019 - 02:16 PM, said: Did you read only OP post? There were more people involved.
For example, my wishlist does not involve any of planned changes (I
am aware of what you announced) and a few of my propositions are in
contrary to what you announced (for example I don't like 5-5-5
scheme you plan to introduce and I hope you will drop this idea)
Link on message: #16513677
HussarKaz, on 02 January 2019 - 02:16 PM, said: Did you read only OP post? There were more people involved.
For example, my wishlist does not involve any of planned changes (I
am aware of what you announced) and a few of my propositions are in
contrary to what you announced (for example I don't like 5-5-5
scheme you plan to introduce and I hope you will drop this idea)
eekeeboo: I read the other posts too, including the replies that also
gave a wishlist but included points of desire included on the
proposed changes. MM changes coming. Ammo changes
coming, it seems punitive to limit a light tanks ability to use
special ammunition when it's already up against tough
competition. You're not forced to play artillery, it is a
choice and the remaining point of artillery per battle.... this has
been discussed extensively. The other point on vehicles is
something discussed in the past that historical accuracy is
something that has to take a back-seat to game balance.
German Tree balance has been announced.
It was also shared new tanks but not announced or confirmed. As you can see half of your wishlist was covered in the announcement the other half has been discussed in the past.
It was also shared new tanks but not announced or confirmed. As you can see half of your wishlist was covered in the announcement the other half has been discussed in the past.
eekeeboo
PLease take Highway back out of the game
02.01.2019 18:45:18
Subject: PLease take Highway back out of the game
Link on message: #16513655
jdc302, on 02 January 2019 - 02:02 PM, said: I have seen a lot of people on forum on different post say
that mines needs to be changed. If you are playing encounter,
northern spawn has the easiest way to get the hill. If you
are a french light on southern spawn and need to cross the water,
you have NO chance of getting to the hill first. And you can only
let the enemy dominate it.
Ceeb, on 02 January 2019 - 02:03 PM, said: Yeah, I'm the only one thats mentioned about these at Tier
10 
RaxipIx, on 02 January 2019 - 02:39 PM, said: So why is Mines still in the game?
markthekiller, on 02 January 2019 - 03:27 PM, said: Wasn't Province removed for high tiers because it was too
small? Then why is Ensk not? With decent view range you can spot
enemies in the first 10 seconds of the game from your own base.
Link on message: #16513655
jdc302, on 02 January 2019 - 02:02 PM, said: I have seen a lot of people on forum on different post say
that mines needs to be changed. If you are playing encounter,
northern spawn has the easiest way to get the hill. If you
are a french light on southern spawn and need to cross the water,
you have NO chance of getting to the hill first. And you can only
let the enemy dominate it. eekeeboo: There's more to a playerbase than just the forums. There are
more forums than just EU ones too. This is the downside to putting
too much weight into one location and one area of feedback.
Mines, in particular, was changed a few times based on not
only feedback but stats too.
Ceeb, on 02 January 2019 - 02:03 PM, said: Yeah, I'm the only one thats mentioned about these at Tier
10 eekeeboo: If you are the only one, that would be that too, but even if
there were 100 people for example, what % of that is that vs the
entire player base? Balancing is important for ALL players, not
just a few %.
RaxipIx, on 02 January 2019 - 02:39 PM, said: So why is Mines still in the game?eekeeboo: Because mines has been reworked a few times and was found to
improve statistically in layouts etc.
markthekiller, on 02 January 2019 - 03:27 PM, said: Wasn't Province removed for high tiers because it was too
small? Then why is Ensk not? With decent view range you can spot
enemies in the first 10 seconds of the game from your own base.eekeeboo: If I remember correctly going to the place to spot enemies
in the first 10 seconds though is great for your team can be
extremely lethal to you and will not result in a whole lot of
incoming damage if you are spotted. For other
replies, I hope people can see the way some people who prefer a
certain play style can love maps and style that others
loathe.
eekeeboo
When Eastern Europeans begin to go to school
02.01.2019 18:38:33
Subject: When Eastern Europeans begin to go to school
Link on message: #16513634
Link on message: #16513634
eekeeboo: I don't see this thread going anywhere constructive soon or
remotely helpful. I'm sure you can find better ways to
express this. Thank-you.
eekeeboo
Gameplay has never been more campy
02.01.2019 18:37:42
Subject: Gameplay has never been more campy
Link on message: #16513625
Link on message: #16513625
eekeeboo: I don't know if it's short memory, not playing for as long.... but
I remember the game in times of much more camp.... games where
in fact like murovanka, proho with 10 tds on the team and no
one moves. I would say the game goes through changes as maps and
missions change and the flavour of the month and new tanks arrive
that affect what people choose to counter them.
There's also that as more casual players play during Christmas etc,
camping is generally a safer option for those people to get damage
than high risk high reward plays that pay off more but require up
to date map knowledge and play styles.
eekeeboo
Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
02.01.2019 18:31:22
Subject: Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
Link on message: #16513602
TungstenHitman, on 02 January 2019 - 03:44 PM, said: Wrong thread for such a question
Link on message: #16513602
TungstenHitman, on 02 January 2019 - 03:44 PM, said: Wrong thread for such a questioneekeeboo: It's always better to tailor the answer to the question for
a specific individual. I can say how to win will usually involve:
1) Don't be afraid to lose your hp to keep a teammate
alive. 2) Finish low hp tanks that are a bigger threat than
high hp tanks who can't pen you or teammate. 3) Never defend
a lost or abandoned flank alone, it's brave and admirable but in
the end, futile. 4) Though contradicting above, sometimes you
need to have a bad game to win the game by enabling your team to
have a good game you sometimes need to be the one who loses.
5) Choosing the right time to push and fall back.
There are more, but those are generic, if there's a replay you can
generally see the pattern of behaviour a person has and how to help
them play more for the win vs more for the damage of self
gain.
eekeeboo
Obj 279(e) [unspecified and hidden objectives or errors?] Please adjust them
02.01.2019 18:26:27
Subject: Obj 279(e) [unspecified and hidden objectives or errors?] Please adjust them
Link on message: #16513580
ValkyrionX, on 02 January 2019 - 02:15 PM, said: I did, of course, and I was told that it is not the
responsibility of the customer service of the game and that they
can not do anything , and not just for this specific mission.
customer service, always the worst experiences
Link on message: #16513580
ValkyrionX, on 02 January 2019 - 02:15 PM, said: I did, of course, and I was told that it is not the
responsibility of the customer service of the game and that they
can not do anything , and not just for this specific mission.
customer service, always the worst experiences
eekeeboo: The customer service representative should be able to at
least pass on the information to the development team, it is also
the most effective way to get large amounts of reports sent to the
dev team for escalation on the fix.
Delhroh
[Tier X] T-100 LT
02.01.2019 17:59:51
Subject: [Tier X] T-100 LT
Link on message: #16513505
Link on message: #16513505
Delhroh: Información sobre el vehículo disponible aquí: PINCHA PARA MÁS INFORMACIÓN
eekeeboo
WHY 2019 changes will not make any difference
02.01.2019 17:45:23
Subject: WHY 2019 changes will not make any difference
Link on message: #16513464
RenamedUser_555746413, on 02 January 2019 - 10:05 AM, said: so been thinking about the proposed tweaks to the game in 2019 and
really don't see where WG are going, its all cosmetic changes,
nothing real and nothing that will change the complaints players
been making for years MM, the template system is the issue,
more templates wont solve the fundamental problem, its a gimmick
nothing more. just ditch the template system full stop.
personally I had no issues with old MM but I cant see how the
template could be any worse if you tried to kill this game. 1
simple improvement to MM is put the but 48% players in a separate
MM, easy to do and make the game better all round arty
no mention what so ever about arty, another huge issue
for ever in game and only made worse with the stun mechanic..
simply remove the god view and have arty aiming at minimap or tanks
within their view range and remove the appalling stun BS
tank balance, 5 tanks getting a buff but entire game needs a
rebalance, get back to abandoned 10.0 patch and sort your game out
gold ammo, the damage nerf welcome but again its only really
a gimmick, ammo needs a total reword and removal of pay to win,, WG
said they had radical ideas for this but go with the easiest option
instead of a game changing improvement maps, for gods sake,
you keep saying its easier to make new maps than rebalance old ones
then bring back highway ??? every change you make is a
disaster, fjords bad, erlenberg terrible, fishermans bay gets worse
every change. just undo all the changes, remove highway and
make new maps (although I gather Minsk is ALREADY under
review for change?? if so that's just really poor) and
bring back UNCHANGED Stalingrad and Kharkov, good maps, balanced
maps and maps that need good gameplay. game mechanics.
ever since failed 1.0 patch I am wondering how spotting mechanics
work now, genuinely don't know anymore and its the same with the
streamers, over and over you hear Orzy, QB etc wondering how they
cant see this tank or that tank or how they are spotted. not
sure if this an issue similar to the shot box issues but needs
sorting rest of the ideas seem pointless to me and make no
real difference, perhaps the rejection of 20 maps you don't want to
play but otherwise just making changes to APPEAR to care so
in summary 10.0 global rebalance please sort maps out stop
reducing the skill level of the game undo most changes last 18
months sort arty sort gold ammo and pay to win I am happy to
pay to play the game but in its current state am playing free play
only, its just got that bad and what is proposed will not halt the
decline of player numbers
Link on message: #16513464
RenamedUser_555746413, on 02 January 2019 - 10:05 AM, said: so been thinking about the proposed tweaks to the game in 2019 and
really don't see where WG are going, its all cosmetic changes,
nothing real and nothing that will change the complaints players
been making for years MM, the template system is the issue,
more templates wont solve the fundamental problem, its a gimmick
nothing more. just ditch the template system full stop.
personally I had no issues with old MM but I cant see how the
template could be any worse if you tried to kill this game. 1
simple improvement to MM is put the but 48% players in a separate
MM, easy to do and make the game better all round arty
no mention what so ever about arty, another huge issue
for ever in game and only made worse with the stun mechanic..
simply remove the god view and have arty aiming at minimap or tanks
within their view range and remove the appalling stun BS
tank balance, 5 tanks getting a buff but entire game needs a
rebalance, get back to abandoned 10.0 patch and sort your game out
gold ammo, the damage nerf welcome but again its only really
a gimmick, ammo needs a total reword and removal of pay to win,, WG
said they had radical ideas for this but go with the easiest option
instead of a game changing improvement maps, for gods sake,
you keep saying its easier to make new maps than rebalance old ones
then bring back highway ??? every change you make is a
disaster, fjords bad, erlenberg terrible, fishermans bay gets worse
every change. just undo all the changes, remove highway and
make new maps (although I gather Minsk is ALREADY under
review for change?? if so that's just really poor) and
bring back UNCHANGED Stalingrad and Kharkov, good maps, balanced
maps and maps that need good gameplay. game mechanics.
ever since failed 1.0 patch I am wondering how spotting mechanics
work now, genuinely don't know anymore and its the same with the
streamers, over and over you hear Orzy, QB etc wondering how they
cant see this tank or that tank or how they are spotted. not
sure if this an issue similar to the shot box issues but needs
sorting rest of the ideas seem pointless to me and make no
real difference, perhaps the rejection of 20 maps you don't want to
play but otherwise just making changes to APPEAR to care so
in summary 10.0 global rebalance please sort maps out stop
reducing the skill level of the game undo most changes last 18
months sort arty sort gold ammo and pay to win I am happy to
pay to play the game but in its current state am playing free play
only, its just got that bad and what is proposed will not halt the
decline of player numbers eekeeboo: They're not just tanks, but also tank lines. There are
more changes that were not announced and other information not
shared but there's no concrete plan for those yet before they can
be shared. Maps: If you look at the Supertest
leaks/announcement section, you will see testing on new maps,
layouts, and design concepts. Spotting mechanics have always
been quite complex, though as far as I'm aware there have been no
changes to the fundamentals to how they work for the tanks but the
way vegetation is placed on maps. Skill level of the game is
important to make it just as accessible as difficult with plans to
help new players learn the game easier in the future.
vuque
İngiliz formunda bulunan düzen ile neden bizim forumda bulunan düzen aynı değ...
02.01.2019 17:41:31
Subject: İngiliz formunda bulunan düzen ile neden bizim forumda bulunan düzen aynı değ...
Link on message: #16513442
Link on message: #16513442
vuque: Eğer bir tankla ilgili konu bulmakta zorlanıyorsanız forumun
arama özelliğini kullanarak ilgili konulara ulaşabileceğinizi
hatırlatmak isterim. Zaten az olan Türkçe forum kullanıcısı
sayımızı böylesine basit bir sebepten doğan sonuçlar ile
cezalandırarak daha da azaltmak istemediğimiz için bu şekilde bir
değişiklik kararı aldık. Sizin gördüğünüz şeyleri tabii ki biz de
görüyoruz, sizin düşündüklerinizi biz de düşünüyoruz ve çeşitli
noktaları göz önünde bulundurarak değerlendiriyoruz. Sonuç olarak
bu karara vardık ve şu an için bu böyle uygulanmaya devam edecek.
Zannedildiği gibi ilgisizlikten veya alt forum açmak çok zaman
alacağından böyle değil bu durum, aksine alt forum açmak 10 dakika
sürmez, veya bir ilgisizlik söz konusu olsa burada üst üste bu
kadar cevap verilmez diye düşünüyorum
eekeeboo
Reporting for Duty
02.01.2019 17:41:29
Subject: Reporting for Duty
Link on message: #16513441
UrQuan, on 02 January 2019 - 02:39 PM, said: Posting this here, as I feel it is more appropriate & relevant
here and prevents too much derailing of another thread:
That's a good aim & great to hear. The forum interaction
between posters & staff has its ups & down on the WoT forums,
with two very dark periods that left many with low confidence in
the forum staff. So it is good to see this reply of yours, knowing
you are doing your best to improve things. Core of it is that there
just have been very few good moderators that have gone beyond 'lock
this thread by forum rules' interaction (which in itself is fine,
no need to spill more then needed on most locking threads) &
do effort to know the community better. We're not all
bad, just a bit jaded by the very long period of non-interaction
beyond basics on the English forum (while we can see staff posting
in several non-english parts of the forum). Note that there
have been good moderators in the past that did their best to break
the mold, but by some of their posts (and yours too) it seems there
is also a deeper issue at work as well, where there seems to be
little communication between the moderators/staff as well.
No clue if it already exists, but quite some forums tend to have a
moderator/staff only section to promote communications between
members through this & to draw attention on threads/forum
subsections & comments that need to be watched closer. Can
also help in managing events, by drawing attention when an issue
arises (like the beta badges not working for some) or giving better
guidance when an issue pops up (like the recent camo issue with the
skorpion that got handled wonderfully by the staff, kudo's to
that!) It also helps in recapping a bit when moderators/staff
return from holidays & can get a quick catch up by a visit to the
moderator/staff only section.
Link on message: #16513441
UrQuan, on 02 January 2019 - 02:39 PM, said: Posting this here, as I feel it is more appropriate & relevant
here and prevents too much derailing of another thread:
That's a good aim & great to hear. The forum interaction
between posters & staff has its ups & down on the WoT forums,
with two very dark periods that left many with low confidence in
the forum staff. So it is good to see this reply of yours, knowing
you are doing your best to improve things. Core of it is that there
just have been very few good moderators that have gone beyond 'lock
this thread by forum rules' interaction (which in itself is fine,
no need to spill more then needed on most locking threads) &
do effort to know the community better. We're not all
bad, just a bit jaded by the very long period of non-interaction
beyond basics on the English forum (while we can see staff posting
in several non-english parts of the forum). Note that there
have been good moderators in the past that did their best to break
the mold, but by some of their posts (and yours too) it seems there
is also a deeper issue at work as well, where there seems to be
little communication between the moderators/staff as well.
No clue if it already exists, but quite some forums tend to have a
moderator/staff only section to promote communications between
members through this & to draw attention on threads/forum
subsections & comments that need to be watched closer. Can
also help in managing events, by drawing attention when an issue
arises (like the beta badges not working for some) or giving better
guidance when an issue pops up (like the recent camo issue with the
skorpion that got handled wonderfully by the staff, kudo's to
that!) It also helps in recapping a bit when moderators/staff
return from holidays & can get a quick catch up by a visit to the
moderator/staff only section. eekeeboo: For myself I stayed up-to-date with the forums on my holiday
while not posting for obvious reasons. I tended to want to keep
up-to-date and finger on the pulse with the things in the
forums. One thing I will say is no matter my personal
conflicts with some people I always try to reserve the throwing of
the rulebook at a person unless they're a repeat offender or break
the rules in a big way. There are people here who unfortunately
cannot post whom I have no problem with personally but I will not
over-rule forum guidelines and rules for personal feelings. It's a
slippery slope to slide down rather quickly. Fortunately though I
know the community quite well, my absence has meant I don't know it
quite as well as I once did. But I feel if I was able to work my
way through moderating the WGL channel in the days of 20k viewers
and no nightbot and the !type59 spam, I stand a good chance for
positive change here. Communication between staff in
regions I can't comment on, as fairly new to this specific team,
but I can say each person has their own way of approaching
community work and interacting with players, not everyone is as
full on or as likely to interact outside of work hours. There are
also elements that different game populations have different ways
to talk and sometimes it's better to interact little and let people
do all the talking. Though I will always endeavour to support
people, even if it's just a like of a post that shows reason.
eekeeboo
Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
02.01.2019 17:33:20
Subject: Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
Link on message: #16513405
Jigabachi, on 02 January 2019 - 02:35 PM, said: What I wrote wasn't really aimed at you alone, you just happened to
be here. And I also know that forums aren't your primary field of
work. But you are there to collect feedback. You can try to
sugarcoat it, but we're the ones seeing the reality every day. The
state of the forum has gone down a lot again, special people are
allowed to run freely and we get absolutely zero support against
them, close to zero comminication from your (meaning WG in general)
side and the mods threadclosers... well. They just close threads,
sometimes even random ones that were dead since weeks (Do they have
to close at least X threads per month?). They don't know their own
forum rules and construct them as they wish - very prominent: The
naming and shaming rule, which sometimes counts on random replays
and even on screenshots with names removed. They don't know when to
make an exception and close all threads that somehow are about MM
or arty, even when it's an elaborate non-whine one that deserves
some space. Countless other examples, but that should be enough for
now. I don't want to be seen as the old whiner again...
Link on message: #16513405
Jigabachi, on 02 January 2019 - 02:35 PM, said: What I wrote wasn't really aimed at you alone, you just happened to
be here. And I also know that forums aren't your primary field of
work. But you are there to collect feedback. You can try to
sugarcoat it, but we're the ones seeing the reality every day. The
state of the forum has gone down a lot again, special people are
allowed to run freely and we get absolutely zero support against
them, close to zero comminication from your (meaning WG in general)
side and the mods threadclosers... well. They just close threads,
sometimes even random ones that were dead since weeks (Do they have
to close at least X threads per month?). They don't know their own
forum rules and construct them as they wish - very prominent: The
naming and shaming rule, which sometimes counts on random replays
and even on screenshots with names removed. They don't know when to
make an exception and close all threads that somehow are about MM
or arty, even when it's an elaborate non-whine one that deserves
some space. Countless other examples, but that should be enough for
now. I don't want to be seen as the old whiner again...eekeeboo: To get better "support" towards the elements of the forums
you mention, I cannot emphasise enough, please report the posts.
All posts reported are generated into a list to review and even
myself, I will report posts as I go through large threads.
The state of the forums is always interesting around holiday
periods when more people engage here or come here to communicate
but combined with the recent videos and the trend in attitude
towards the state of the game etc will also affect the general mood
and perception of the forum.
eekeeboo
My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
02.01.2019 16:03:55
Subject: My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
Link on message: #16513037
HussarKaz, on 02 January 2019 - 01:48 PM, said: But this is a "wishlist" thread about the changes we dream
about, not a topic regarding announced planned changes
Link on message: #16513037
HussarKaz, on 02 January 2019 - 01:48 PM, said: But this is a "wishlist" thread about the changes we dream
about, not a topic regarding announced planned changes eekeeboo: I took the time to read the wishlist, a large majority of
the things on the list are covered in the announced planned
changes. With other changes possible they can all affect the things
on the wishlist. It's always nice to see wishlists, constructive
feedback. But at the same time writing a wishlist seemingly not
taking into account any of the information from the planned changes
announcements is somewhat counterproductive for all.
eekeeboo
Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
02.01.2019 16:01:15
Subject: Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
Link on message: #16513030
Igor_BL, on 02 January 2019 - 01:54 PM, said: nobody expects you to be here 24/7. ofc it is not realistic.
After all, it is a job. but we had several situations, where mods and CCs on English section are not active at all, and we had major bugs atm. Like servers down, first time chat went off (like 2 years ago... My God...) etc etc.
Servers shut down, EU2 is more off then on, and after 4 days, we get someone from WG that writes that they know about the problem.
great.
Or, my favourite, PMM rework thread. FIRST TIME a person from WG appeared on that thread was on page 200 or something. COME ON! 200 pages, one of the biggest issues at the time, and nobody from WG wrote anything. You dont have to be here 24/7. Just make sure that someone is here when the sh*t hits the fan. Nothing more. short announcement or post is enough. it doesnt need to be some big explanation, article or dedicated thread. Just inform the playerbase what's happening and when it will be fixed. we had these kind of discussions with Phelan, a long time ago, he promised the situation will change... And it did, but for a short time. Later Phelan got promoted I think, and we stucked on the old
WG-players relationship on this forum, where English section is blind totally when bigger problems occur.
While subforums like German and Turkish were updated regulary.
Link on message: #16513030
Igor_BL, on 02 January 2019 - 01:54 PM, said: nobody expects you to be here 24/7. ofc it is not realistic.After all, it is a job. but we had several situations, where mods and CCs on English section are not active at all, and we had major bugs atm. Like servers down, first time chat went off (like 2 years ago... My God...) etc etc.
Servers shut down, EU2 is more off then on, and after 4 days, we get someone from WG that writes that they know about the problem.
great.
Or, my favourite, PMM rework thread. FIRST TIME a person from WG appeared on that thread was on page 200 or something. COME ON! 200 pages, one of the biggest issues at the time, and nobody from WG wrote anything. You dont have to be here 24/7. Just make sure that someone is here when the sh*t hits the fan. Nothing more. short announcement or post is enough. it doesnt need to be some big explanation, article or dedicated thread. Just inform the playerbase what's happening and when it will be fixed. we had these kind of discussions with Phelan, a long time ago, he promised the situation will change... And it did, but for a short time. Later Phelan got promoted I think, and we stucked on the old
WG-players relationship on this forum, where English section is blind totally when bigger problems occur.
While subforums like German and Turkish were updated regulary.
eekeeboo: I don't know what the status of staff presence was before my
own. Just so that you're aware that there is usually a presence
from WG here somewhere. But community work is more than just
forums. Right now I'm having to interact on the forums (and my
messages). Do my emails and put together feedback. Interact on
Social media platforms like Facebook and also keep up-to-date on
discord and Reddit as well as running things like giveaways and
competitions and filling out all the other things I need to do. I'm
sure you can appreciate just how much multi-tasking needs to happen
and how easily a thread or post can get over-looked or neglected.
Like in the last 2 weeks where people have been in the forums
helping out in my absence but nowhere to the same level I was
before I left. The main aim I had when moving from
WoWP to WoT was to bring the level of interaction I had there to
here. I will not always be popular in what I say or share, but I
will always be forthright in the information I can share and will
share it as frequently as I can. There needs to be an element of
understanding though that there is literally only so many places a
person can be at the same time.
eekeeboo
PLease take Highway back out of the game
02.01.2019 15:56:51
Subject: PLease take Highway back out of the game
Link on message: #16513022
Ceeb, on 02 January 2019 - 01:54 PM, said: While I also like Erlenberg old and new you (WG) havent
listened to feedback on maps like Ensk/Mines at Tier 10. Yet
they are still here.
Link on message: #16513022
Ceeb, on 02 January 2019 - 01:54 PM, said: While I also like Erlenberg old and new you (WG) havent
listened to feedback on maps like Ensk/Mines at Tier 10. Yet
they are still here. eekeeboo: Because feedback on a map needs to come from more people in
more areas on multiple servers over multiple demographics of the
player base reviewed with data. Map feedback does not come from 1
person and then get acted on.
eekeeboo
Obj 279(e) [unspecified and hidden objectives or errors?] Please adjust them
02.01.2019 15:54:48
Subject: Obj 279(e) [unspecified and hidden objectives or errors?] Please adjust them
Link on message: #16513019
Link on message: #16513019
eekeeboo: Have you taken the time to submit a ticket with screenshots of the
battles showing progression not taking place despite completing the
objectives? If you have not done so, please do so that this can be
passed on and escalated to the development team. Thank-you!
eekeeboo
PLease take Highway back out of the game
02.01.2019 15:51:44
Subject: PLease take Highway back out of the game
Link on message: #16513006
Link on message: #16513006
eekeeboo: Though we all have maps we dislike, sometimes popular dislike! It's
important to note that unless a map is statistically imbalanced or
poses other problems it is unlikely to be removed. We always gather
feedback and pass it on, with regards to players feeling on maps
and the preferred layouts etc, but map diversity is important to
try and give every tank an opportunity to perform in more
games. For instance I always loved Erlenberg, not a
big fan of the new map, but I haven't played it as frequently and
thus haven't gotten my head around it as well when attacking.
eekeeboo
Reporting for Duty
02.01.2019 15:46:32
Subject: Reporting for Duty
Link on message: #16512995
DangerMouse, on 02 January 2019 - 01:20 PM, said: Any update on the missing Beta reward badges, Support have been
closing lots of tickets but providing little update? DM
Link on message: #16512995
DangerMouse, on 02 January 2019 - 01:20 PM, said: Any update on the missing Beta reward badges, Support have been
closing lots of tickets but providing little update? DMeekeeboo: I've only just come back this morning and I've not had an
update from anyone, I put this down to some people also taking
holidays, so, unfortunately, it can be there will be a delay in
finding the issue and a fix being rolled out, while also
considering that the initial fix also took a while. The desire is
that the fix doesn't break anything more.
eekeeboo
Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
02.01.2019 15:42:49
Subject: Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
Link on message: #16512986
Jigabachi, on 02 January 2019 - 01:14 PM, said: edit/important note: I mixed up some threads. I thought that this
was one of the other two threads I had in mind. But the point still
stands... You should watch out what you ask for. Asking for
replays or even simple elaboration will get yourself on the stake
here quite quickly. Not talking about Igor here (bad transition is
bad), but the few special ones who caused the discussion to once
again turn ugly on the last few pages. So be careful, or they'll
call you a paid minion of WG, too! Oh... wait. Jokes aside.
I apprechiate your activity here, but it would really be cool if
that happened more often. And in threads/discussions where it's
really needed. The special people I mentioned are allowed to roam
the forums freely without any punishment, being allowed to spread
their nonsense everywhere without anyone of you caring. That's
slowly getting tiring, especially since I don't even play the game
right now and theoretically couldn't care less. But I simply don't
like it when dumb people use public places as a stage to spread
their stupidity. Neither on the internet, nor in RL. So... yeah.
Long story short: Would be awesome if you guys could be more
active. And either change the titles of moderators to
"threadclosers" or actually make them real moderators with a voice,
rather than just robots. Coincidental constructive feedback
over.
Link on message: #16512986
Jigabachi, on 02 January 2019 - 01:14 PM, said: edit/important note: I mixed up some threads. I thought that this
was one of the other two threads I had in mind. But the point still
stands... You should watch out what you ask for. Asking for
replays or even simple elaboration will get yourself on the stake
here quite quickly. Not talking about Igor here (bad transition is
bad), but the few special ones who caused the discussion to once
again turn ugly on the last few pages. So be careful, or they'll
call you a paid minion of WG, too! Oh... wait. Jokes aside.
I apprechiate your activity here, but it would really be cool if
that happened more often. And in threads/discussions where it's
really needed. The special people I mentioned are allowed to roam
the forums freely without any punishment, being allowed to spread
their nonsense everywhere without anyone of you caring. That's
slowly getting tiring, especially since I don't even play the game
right now and theoretically couldn't care less. But I simply don't
like it when dumb people use public places as a stage to spread
their stupidity. Neither on the internet, nor in RL. So... yeah.
Long story short: Would be awesome if you guys could be more
active. And either change the titles of moderators to
"threadclosers" or actually make them real moderators with a voice,
rather than just robots. Coincidental constructive feedback
over.eekeeboo: I was on holiday for the last 2 weeks, hence the inactivity.
I'm sure you'll also appreciate just HOW much work was needed on
the lead up to Christmas moving to a new game with new everything
in the 2 weeks before that holiday. For moderators,
they have a lot of work and a lot of content to cover in a short
time. Like anything to be able to cover all that needs to be
covered more details are provided to those sanctioned in the
message they receive. Threads that are closed are always referenced
to the forum rules. If there were more interactions then they would
spend more time doing this and not ensuring the forums don't
devolve into the state you mention.
eekeeboo
My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
02.01.2019 15:37:09
Subject: My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
Link on message: #16512975
Ceeb, on 02 January 2019 - 01:35 PM, said: Every link I've posted works. Does that mean I can become a
mod or do I need to fail at simple things too?
Link on message: #16512975
Ceeb, on 02 January 2019 - 01:35 PM, said: Every link I've posted works. Does that mean I can become a
mod or do I need to fail at simple things too?eekeeboo: Try it again when you post a long link you'll note the
addition of "...." in the middle. When you take the time to read
posts and understand what is being said in them. Note not
complaining at the wall of text but that the post is asking for
things highlighted in an announcement. Then sure, please feel free
to apply to be a moderator, after of course taking the time to
temper your etiquette and courteous nature in responses.
eekeeboo
My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
02.01.2019 15:33:07
Subject: My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
Link on message: #16512957
Ceeb, on 02 January 2019 - 01:31 PM, said: ffs cant even post a link... and you complain about a wall
of text How the feck can you become Mod. ? is there some
sort of test ?
Link on message: #16512957
Ceeb, on 02 January 2019 - 01:31 PM, said: ffs cant even post a link... and you complain about a wall
of text How the feck can you become Mod. ? is there some
sort of test ?eekeeboo: You would also be aware that it's because of the way the
site summarises a link. But you'd know that if you took the time to
not be so rude. Posting long links sometimes works, other times
doesn't. Next I'm NOT a moderator I'm a Community Manager, please
get this right. Thank-you.
eekeeboo
A "fair" question.
02.01.2019 15:32:10
Subject: A "fair" question.
Link on message: #16512954
Link on message: #16512954
eekeeboo: Just to be clear ammunition does not affect RNG on aim, dispersion
or anything else. What ammunition DOES do is affect the velocity of
the round which can affect the amount you need to lead aim etc. But
this is not reliant on the amount you pay on the ammo, it's the
ammo type and how it behaves. The best thing you can
do to help your aiming, get better equipment, use highly trained
crew, get a feel for your tanks shooting behaviour and embrace the
RNG when it comes to snap shots. KV2 doesn't always 1 shot random
shots at the start of the game aiming at nothing, but when you do,
you remember it.
eekeeboo
My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
02.01.2019 15:26:29
Subject: My wishlist for 2019 , and yours?
Link on message: #16512931
Link on message: #16512931
eekeeboo: This may be interesting.... https://worldoftanks.eu/en/news/general-news/things-to-come-2019/
http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/693605-what%e2%80%99s-coming-in-2019/
Though my wall of text senses are tingling, I think
it's important to read relevant announcements before you make
extensive posts and threads like these.
vuque
İngiliz formunda bulunan düzen ile neden bizim forumda bulunan düzen aynı değ...
02.01.2019 14:36:16
Subject: İngiliz formunda bulunan düzen ile neden bizim forumda bulunan düzen aynı değ...
Link on message: #16512767
Link on message: #16512767
vuque: Daha önce belirttiğim sebepler üzerine böyle bir uygulama
yapmaktayız ve şu an için bunu değiştirmeyi düşünmemekteyiz.
İleride belki bazı değişiklikler olabilir ancak farklı dil
forumlarının, bölgesel ihtiyaçlara göre şekillendirilebileceğini, o
ihtiyaçlara hitap edecek şekilde bazı değişiklikler olabileceğini
hatırlatmak isterim.
eekeeboo
Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
02.01.2019 14:20:09
Subject: Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
Link on message: #16512710
Igor_BL, on 02 January 2019 - 11:23 AM, said: True. But sometimes you just cant do anything to win. You can try
your best and that's about it.
We all had games and series of those where you cant do any. It is just like that.
"problem" starts when people dont recognize opposite ones, where you play bad and still winning..
But when you play good and lose, you remember those well.... And thus teories about "rigged MM" can start.
Link on message: #16512710
Igor_BL, on 02 January 2019 - 11:23 AM, said: True. But sometimes you just cant do anything to win. You can try
your best and that's about it.We all had games and series of those where you cant do any. It is just like that.
"problem" starts when people dont recognize opposite ones, where you play bad and still winning..
But when you play good and lose, you remember those well.... And thus teories about "rigged MM" can start.
eekeeboo: This is true, but as I mentioned, always considering
every small thing you can improve, eventually those small things
add-up, without the replays, it's pretty hard to see if that was
the case here or not.
Delhroh
Preguntas/Respuestas del Staff (Especiales, Tienda Premium...)
02.01.2019 13:52:07
Subject: Preguntas/Respuestas del Staff (Especiales, Tienda Premium...)
Link on message: #16512579
Link on message: #16512579
Delhroh: Saludos, Gracias por editar tu mensaje para no rompler las
normas del foro. Un saludo. P.D.: Revisaré el
mensaje privado cuando tenga algo de tiempo. 
eekeeboo
Reporting for Duty
02.01.2019 13:30:24
Subject: Reporting for Duty
Link on message: #16512492
HanZi, on 29 December 2018 - 04:25 PM, said: New face, same crap. Just like poletics.
1ucky, on 31 December 2018 - 07:16 PM, said: Hello, welcome, good luck and all the best! 
Link on message: #16512492
HanZi, on 29 December 2018 - 04:25 PM, said: New face, same crap. Just like poletics. eekeeboo: You mean different face and a similar approach to
interaction that is based on the role and position of a job and
location in the chain of staff... it's almost like it's a job with
a role or set of key responsibilities... I think you may be on to
something
1ucky, on 31 December 2018 - 07:16 PM, said: Hello, welcome, good luck and all the best! eekeeboo: Thank-you and good luck in your battles too!
eekeeboo
Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
02.01.2019 12:55:27
Subject: Please tell me, how do I win a battle? 17 games, 2 Win, 1609 WN8
Link on message: #16512337
Link on message: #16512337
eekeeboo: Apologies for being late to the forum "party". Without
a replay, it's hard to offer reliable or valid advice on how/what
you could improve. Sometimes it's important to look at every
opportunity you had in a game to improve. It's not going to
guarantee a win but it's a good way to change your mindset to try
and improve your chance of winning.
CLRG
Daily Tournaments - Q&A - Post your questions here!
02.01.2019 12:40:25
Subject: Daily Tournaments - Q&A - Post your questions here!
Link on message: #16512291
will0hlep, on 29 December 2018 - 12:38 PM, said: https://worldoftanks...nts/5000001075/, TD_UK had a
team entered in this tournament but it appears it never ran, what
happened and what is being done about it?
haribegovic36, on 27 December 2018 - 06:36 PM, said: hey admin, can you please switch players in my team, because one
player can not play at 9 o clock https://worldoftanks...eam/5000832167/
remove SpeedFighter_Hero
and put in :
luciferxix thx in adv.
Link on message: #16512291
will0hlep, on 29 December 2018 - 12:38 PM, said: https://worldoftanks...nts/5000001075/, TD_UK had a
team entered in this tournament but it appears it never ran, what
happened and what is being done about it?CLRG: hello will0hlep, when a tournament doesn't start, it usually means
it has encountered a technical issue and will be canceled. You can
however check this forum to see if specific
information was posted.
haribegovic36, on 27 December 2018 - 06:36 PM, said: hey admin, can you please switch players in my team, because one
player can not play at 9 o clock https://worldoftanks...eam/5000832167/
remove SpeedFighter_Hero
and put in :
luciferxix thx in adv. CLRG: Hello Haribegovic36, I'm afraid it is not possible for us to switch
members within short notice. 
thePhilX
Clans - Zusammenfassung für 2018 und was kommt
02.01.2019 11:59:39
Subject: Clans - Zusammenfassung für 2018 und was kommt
Link on message: #16512151
MyGuardianIsTheReaper, on 17 December 2018 - 06:31 PM, said: Als ein Spieler der vermutlich nie einen Panzer durch CW erhalten
wird: Wird es diesen (und generell CW Panzer) dann auch für Bonds
geben? (Der "was erwartet uns 2019" Artikel war diesbezüglich nicht
allzu spezifisch) Ich wollte halt generell schon immer etwas mit
"Chieftain" im Namen haben 
binmaa10, on 17 December 2018 - 10:27 PM, said: Oder auch einfach ein Modus in dem man ohne sich Gedanken
über irgendwelche Ratings einfach mit einer größeren Guppe
gemütlicher Leute zusammensetzen kann bist man keine Lust
mehr hat ohne dass einem eine Zeitschranke einen Riegel vorschiebt.
Geno1isme, on 02 January 2019 - 08:18 AM, said: Dachte eigentlich es soll Mitte Januar losgehen, dann wirds
langsam Zeit ...
Link on message: #16512151
MyGuardianIsTheReaper, on 17 December 2018 - 06:31 PM, said: Als ein Spieler der vermutlich nie einen Panzer durch CW erhalten
wird: Wird es diesen (und generell CW Panzer) dann auch für Bonds
geben? (Der "was erwartet uns 2019" Artikel war diesbezüglich nicht
allzu spezifisch) Ich wollte halt generell schon immer etwas mit
"Chieftain" im Namen haben thePhilX: Zum Ende der Kampagne hin könnt ihr erneut mit einer Auktion
rechnen, bei der Spieler, die es nicht in die Panzerränge geschafft
haben, mit etwas Glück doch noch einen Panzer erhalten können.
binmaa10, on 17 December 2018 - 10:27 PM, said: Oder auch einfach ein Modus in dem man ohne sich Gedanken
über irgendwelche Ratings einfach mit einer größeren Guppe
gemütlicher Leute zusammensetzen kann bist man keine Lust
mehr hat ohne dass einem eine Zeitschranke einen Riegel vorschiebt.thePhilX: Wir haben die Bollwerkzeiten letzte Woche bereits angepasst,
somit können unter der Woche Bollwerke jetzt bis 02:00 Uhr und am
Wochenende bis 03:00 Uhr gefahren werden. Genauere Infos findest du
hier. Wenn du der Meinung bist, man sollte die
Einschränkung komplett aufheben, schreib dort in den Thread deine
Meinung zu den neuen Zeiten.
Geno1isme, on 02 January 2019 - 08:18 AM, said: Dachte eigentlich es soll Mitte Januar losgehen, dann wirds
langsam Zeit ...thePhilX: Es wird demnächst ein offizielles Video zur Kampagne geben.
Falathi
Trójkącik czerwony
01.01.2019 19:05:47
Subject: Trójkącik czerwony
Link on message: #16510714
Link on message: #16510714
Falathi: Ermm... nie mam pojęcia, co to jest, ale dzięki za zgłoszenie.
Przekaże to jako błąd bo mam pewne wątpliwości czy to aby na pewno
założony efekt 
Реклама | Adv