Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Wargaming League: Upcoming Changes
Link on message: #14628269
ionicafardefric, on 19 July 2017 - 04:26 AM, said: "all the professional players and teams have attracted more and
more viewers season after season". Must be living on a different
planet. Nobody is interested in WoT e-sports. The reasons are
obvious. 1)the spectators don't get a first person view of the
players, the only see them in 3rd person, so three's no way to see
how they are aiming or how they are moving the camera (or at least
that was the case the last time I tried to watch it). Imagine
people watching cs:go only watching the match from a 3rd person
view - how popular do you think that would be? 2)the interface
is counter intuitive to the actual game -lasers pointing,
all tanks revealead for both teams. 3)The focus is more on the
players, less on the actual tanks and gameplay. 4)the comentators
are bad, like in really bad. 5)The spectator camera is all over the
place, it constantly jumps from player to player. You can't see
appreciate the positions and thinking behind the scenes when the
spectator is spazzing out like a hamster on caffeine, not focusing
more then two seconds on a player. 6) gold ammo takes all skill
requirements away - they just point and click. 7)unbalances in
tanks - you'll notice both teams are entirely made up by the same
two tanks. 8)Corridor maps don't make for much entertainment.
9)Waiting times between the games are longer then the games
themselves. You attempt to fill it up with the same bad comentators
and boring analysis. We are there to see plays, not people talking
about plays. This is what I came up from the top of my head, in
about 30 seconds. You have more time and professional people to
look at this, right?Then why are you so blind to the obvious?
Link on message: #14628269
ionicafardefric, on 19 July 2017 - 04:26 AM, said: "all the professional players and teams have attracted more and
more viewers season after season". Must be living on a different
planet. Nobody is interested in WoT e-sports. The reasons are
obvious. 1)the spectators don't get a first person view of the
players, the only see them in 3rd person, so three's no way to see
how they are aiming or how they are moving the camera (or at least
that was the case the last time I tried to watch it). Imagine
people watching cs:go only watching the match from a 3rd person
view - how popular do you think that would be? 2)the interface
is counter intuitive to the actual game -lasers pointing,
all tanks revealead for both teams. 3)The focus is more on the
players, less on the actual tanks and gameplay. 4)the comentators
are bad, like in really bad. 5)The spectator camera is all over the
place, it constantly jumps from player to player. You can't see
appreciate the positions and thinking behind the scenes when the
spectator is spazzing out like a hamster on caffeine, not focusing
more then two seconds on a player. 6) gold ammo takes all skill
requirements away - they just point and click. 7)unbalances in
tanks - you'll notice both teams are entirely made up by the same
two tanks. 8)Corridor maps don't make for much entertainment.
9)Waiting times between the games are longer then the games
themselves. You attempt to fill it up with the same bad comentators
and boring analysis. We are there to see plays, not people talking
about plays. This is what I came up from the top of my head, in
about 30 seconds. You have more time and professional people to
look at this, right?Then why are you so blind to the obvious?Ectar: 1) Player PoV has been in game since April 2016, it's
regularly used to show the where the player is aiming and what he
sees 2) the Laser pointing view is very very rarely used. It's only
in slow parts of matching to see where a tank may be aiming.
- You say the UI is confusing as it's different, that's a
fair point, I always try to explain what viewers are looking at for
those not familiar with the esports mode - You use Counter
Strike in a previous example and yet that game as a spectator sport
almost constantly has the xray vision on to show you were both
teams are at all times. Well, that's why you can see both teams on
the minimap for World of Tanks esports mode, to help viewers
understand the positioning of the teams (It's something only
visible to spectators). 3) The focus i'd say is split on the
players and the tanks along with the tactics. We always try to talk
about why certain tanks are picked and what we expect from
them. 4) Personal choice I guess, but are you watching the
EU, NA, RU or APAC regions, and if so, what season did you watch?
5) The spectating we have now is arguably the best it's ever been.
It will always have to jump from vehicle to vehicle or angle to
angle to catch all the action. 7) It's vary rare you'll ever
see a team made up of only 2 tanks. I think I've only seen that on
Cliff and it's not really a reliable tactic (as otherwise everyone
would be doing it). 8) I agree maps could do with work, but we can
only work with what we have and the maps are chosen specifically to
avoid being too favourable for one side (the teams swap sides
during a map remember) 9) We have 14 players to be ready remotely
when playing a match. Normally it goes smoothly but it's very easy
for a technical issue to crop up. We try to keep downtime to a
minimum during broadcasts and there is always room for improvement.
That's a fair point. If you watched the Grand Finals 2017
you'll see that every gap between rounds we filled with tactical
segments talking about what just happened and using an enlarged map
analysis to explain it. I felt it was the best post match analysis
we've done at a finals and hope we can do more stuff like that for
the regular season. Thanks for the feedback. I hope your
feedback is based on the most recent season. It has changed a lot
from how things looked 2-3 years about.
Subject: The WoT European Championship 2017: register now!
Link on message: #14489757
Mr_Brandude, on 02 July 2017 - 05:24 PM, said: When is qualifiers cause I have school and stuff 
Link on message: #14489757
Mr_Brandude, on 02 July 2017 - 05:24 PM, said: When is qualifiers cause I have school and stuff Ectar: It's all there on the article dude. Click on the section
"Structure of the tournament" for all the dates.
Subject: The WoT European Championship 2017: register now!
Link on message: #14488291
repineheart, on 30 June 2017 - 08:48 PM, said: What about countries outside Europe? Can we have a "Rest of the
World" pin?
marlen_marksman_accurate, on 02 July 2017 - 12:03 PM, said: evrything is paid i mean when you enter the tournament they
pay all the stuff hotel, food and trip you dont need to pay
nothing no? and another qwestion i have tier 7 is good
or no?
Link on message: #14488291
repineheart, on 30 June 2017 - 08:48 PM, said: What about countries outside Europe? Can we have a "Rest of the
World" pin?Ectar: You do understand the concept of a European
Championship right?
marlen_marksman_accurate, on 02 July 2017 - 12:03 PM, said: evrything is paid i mean when you enter the tournament they
pay all the stuff hotel, food and trip you dont need to pay
nothing no? and another qwestion i have tier 7 is good
or no? Ectar: For the trip to gamescom if you qualify, travel etc
are all covered as listed in the rules. European Championship
Offline Finals at gamescom: The teams that finish in the top three
at the end of the European qualifiers, and the team from Germany
(as the host nation) will be eligible for the finals in Cologne
during gamescom 2017, on August 24 and 25. The cost of travel and
accommodation will be covered by Wargaming for all participants.
All participants are required to be physically present at gamescom
to be able to play in the finals. Any participant under the age of
16 will be required to travel with a parent or guardian. The cost
of travel and accommodation will be covered for that person. All
the participants will require a valid passport or ID card and, if
necessary, the relevant legal authorization (VISA) to enter
Germany. The players will receive a separate offline rulebook and
guidelines when they qualify. Players should show a high level of
professionalism while conducting themselves with locals, staff, and
organisers. It's a tier 8 tournament so everyone will
be playing tier 8 tanks. You'll won't get fair only using tier
7. It's highly recommended that you have played some 3v3 at
tier 8 already to know what you're getting into and the tactics
involved. Common tanks that will be used will be the 252U
Defender, AMX 50 100, M 41 90 GF and the VK100.01. Lorraine
40t or Skorpion may be used too. With all the recent buffed
tier 8 premiums there is only a few regular tech tree tanks that
are viable or can keep up with the armour needed or damage output.
Subject: Chieftain Mk.6 will not replace the FV215b
Link on message: #14436082
Link on message: #14436082
Ectar: Holy thread revival Batman! 

Subject: Coming Soon: Road to Tankfest Tournament
Link on message: #14257051
Link on message: #14257051
Ectar: Cool, I remember speaking to Victor at Tankfest about 2 years ago
regarding something like this
Subject: The Grand Finals 2017: Trailer
Link on message: #14237446
leggasiini, on 05 May 2017 - 02:20 PM, said: What?? I thought watching 7x Maus "skillfully"
yoloing another team of 7x Maus is super useful to
watch?
leggasiini, on 05 May 2017 - 02:20 PM, said: I mean, there is so much skill going on there that i cannot
believe it
Link on message: #14237446
leggasiini, on 05 May 2017 - 02:20 PM, said: What?? I thought watching 7x Maus "skillfully"
yoloing another team of 7x Maus is super useful to
watch? Ectar: You can't get 7 Maus in one team. The most you could have is
6 and I think that's only been seen once or twice all season.
leggasiini, on 05 May 2017 - 02:20 PM, said: I mean, there is so much skill going on there that i cannot
believe itEctar: I look forward to seeing your team playing next season.
I mean with your reply indicating there is no skill
involved at that level, so you should easily be able to enter
your own team and win right? I guess you'll say something like "No
thanks" or "Waste of time/I don't have the time" which is confusing
to everyone reading this and your prior statement. By that I mean
to the casual observer, as a player with over 37,000 battles you're
clearly someone with a great deal of passion for this game
(especially for the difficult and hard to understand/play Japanese
heavies), and having the opportunity to play a game mode you feel
requires no skill and has a cash prize? Well that's easy money
isn't it? I mean it's right there for the taking.
Subject: WGL EU Finals - Pool winners?
Link on message: #14132725
KaPToHHbIu_EH0T, on 16 April 2017 - 04:21 PM, said: would be nice if they put up a list of winners or something.... but
hey it's WG
Link on message: #14132725
KaPToHHbIu_EH0T, on 16 April 2017 - 04:21 PM, said: would be nice if they put up a list of winners or something.... but
hey it's WGEctar: Hello, The list of winners was published on Facebook
- https://www.facebook...560124367339214
Subject: Game lobby - Soviet flag missing on purpose?
Link on message: #14124492
Tomotorqemada, on 14 April 2017 - 10:25 AM, said: Just rotated the camera all around 360 degrees of the "holiday"
garage. Germans are there, and Czech, and British and (for some
reason) even America and Canada and (ffs!) Brazil. Poland, of
course. And Turkey. Soviets aint there, neither are the Russians.
What is that? Racism? History manipul? Or just contributing to the
top donating regions?
Link on message: #14124492
Tomotorqemada, on 14 April 2017 - 10:25 AM, said: Just rotated the camera all around 360 degrees of the "holiday"
garage. Germans are there, and Czech, and British and (for some
reason) even America and Canada and (ffs!) Brazil. Poland, of
course. And Turkey. Soviets aint there, neither are the Russians.
What is that? Racism? History manipul? Or just contributing to the
top donating regions?Ectar: Russia is now a race? It's the 6 year
anniversary hanger for the EU and NA servers. Flags in-game are
from countries who make up the main populations of those servers.
Subject: More flag emblems
Link on message: #14104856
Pingu4582, on 10 April 2017 - 04:36 PM, said: Hey Ectar, I noticed that it has been a year since I created
this thread and I was wondering if you have any news regarding
whether wargaming are considering my idea for implementation. I'm
still as passionate as ever for its introduction to the game.
Thanks 
Link on message: #14104856
Pingu4582, on 10 April 2017 - 04:36 PM, said: Hey Ectar, I noticed that it has been a year since I created
this thread and I was wondering if you have any news regarding
whether wargaming are considering my idea for implementation. I'm
still as passionate as ever for its introduction to the game.

Ectar: I left Wargaming in June 2016 I'm afraid. The last thing I
heard then was a mix of "It's complicated" and
then "It's not a high priority/there isn't enough demand or
expected demand". I reckon you have as much chance of seeing
the Saltire at this stage as you do the Chieftain to be
honest. Oh and the colour is wrong, it should be a lighter
blue (Pantone 300 specifically)
Subject: M6A2E1 aka The Mutant
Link on message: #14059726
BravelyRanAway, on 31 March 2017 - 08:33 PM, said: You can chill with the exasperation of the 'Dear Gods', I do very
well understand income doesn't equal profit. In this case wages,
rents, elec, phones, servers and sundry are king.........unlike
other businesses, there is no raw material to be purchased. Victor
is a new billionaire.....this company is not losing money or going
to fold because of one pixel tank.
Link on message: #14059726
BravelyRanAway, on 31 March 2017 - 08:33 PM, said: You can chill with the exasperation of the 'Dear Gods', I do very
well understand income doesn't equal profit. In this case wages,
rents, elec, phones, servers and sundry are king.........unlike
other businesses, there is no raw material to be purchased. Victor
is a new billionaire.....this company is not losing money or going
to fold because of one pixel tank.Ectar: But if I don't appease the gods who will? RNGesus will
come smite us down! Fire and brimstone coming down from the
skies! Rivers and seas boiling! Forty years of darkness!
Earthquakes, volcanoes.. The dead rising from the grave! Human
sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!
Subject: M6A2E1 aka The Mutant
Link on message: #14059680
arthurwellsley, on 31 March 2017 - 08:14 PM, said: PS re your comment above "pretend to be an internet lawyer". I do
not pretend to be an internet lawyer. In rl the university degrees
I have are LLB(hons), and LLM, and although I have now stopped as I
have better things to do with my time, in the past I used to teach
contract law part time at a London college.
Link on message: #14059680
arthurwellsley, on 31 March 2017 - 08:14 PM, said: PS re your comment above "pretend to be an internet lawyer". I do
not pretend to be an internet lawyer. In rl the university degrees
I have are LLB(hons), and LLM, and although I have now stopped as I
have better things to do with my time, in the past I used to teach
contract law part time at a London college.Ectar: If you took offence at that comment. It wasn't intended. It
was more really "I don't know what I'm talking about, so I'm not
going to tell people what they can and can't do". The only
thing I know a little about is consumer rights as I used to
work at Nokia for 2 years dealing with handset repairs and warranty
claims (and thus always read the warranty now on items I
purchase now to make sure I understand what covered and what's
not).
Subject: M6A2E1 aka The Mutant
Link on message: #14059620
jabster, on 31 March 2017 - 08:05 PM, said: And again you seem to be making the argument that if WG can
make some extra money then it's fine. Tell you what let's put a
premium tank on sale for £10 but then charge £30 for it. Nothing
wrong there surely as the still have to run the company?
Maybe you also want to get rid of consumer protection law to help
these poor little global companies turn a profit?
Link on message: #14059620
jabster, on 31 March 2017 - 08:05 PM, said: And again you seem to be making the argument that if WG can
make some extra money then it's fine. Tell you what let's put a
premium tank on sale for £10 but then charge £30 for it. Nothing
wrong there surely as the still have to run the company?
Maybe you also want to get rid of consumer protection law to help
these poor little global companies turn a profit?Ectar: I'm just saying that people can change opinions or decisions
over time. If you're going to quote consumer protection law,
then by all means contact your lawyer and have him discuss this
with WG if you feel you have a case. That's something I can't
comment on as I don't pretend to be an internet lawyer and for me
personally, I'm not interested in this promotion or affected by
it.
Subject: M6A2E1 aka The Mutant
Link on message: #14059607
Ectar, on 31 March 2017 - 07:59 PM, said:
jabster, on 31 March 2017 - 08:01 PM,
said: So basically WG can promise anything to get players to part
with their money but if they see an opportunity to make a quick
buck then it's fine to throw that out of the window. Well all I can
say is I'm glad I stopped spending money on this game as this a new
low even by WG's normally low standards. I'm sure WG
have explained the reasoning why. It's not for me to defend it.
I'm just saying that things change. Remember server
roaming was coming and now it's not? Remember quake engine coming?
Remember the Chieftain? Sadly for whatever reason things
change. Be it people who make the decisions or the reasons behind
those decisions no longer being relevant.
jabster, on 31 March 2017 - 08:01 PM, said: So basically WG can promise anything to get players to part with
their money but if they see an opportunity to make a quick buck
then it's fine to throw that out of the window. Well all I can say
is I'm glad I stopped spending money on this game as this a new low
even by WG's normally low standards.
Panzerstaale, on 31 March 2017 - 08:02 PM, said: Then explain the difference between the two? Why not put the
"Mutant" as a contest prize, and sell the Type 59 instead?
Ectar, on 31 March 2017 - 07:59 PM, said: Sadly for whatever reason things change. Be it people who make the
decisions or the reasons behind those decisions no longer being
relevant.
Link on message: #14059607
Ectar, on 31 March 2017 - 07:59 PM, said:
jabster, on 31 March 2017 - 08:01 PM,
said: So basically WG can promise anything to get players to part
with their money but if they see an opportunity to make a quick
buck then it's fine to throw that out of the window. Well all I can
say is I'm glad I stopped spending money on this game as this a new
low even by WG's normally low standards. I'm sure WG
have explained the reasoning why. It's not for me to defend it.
I'm just saying that things change. Remember server
roaming was coming and now it's not? Remember quake engine coming?
Remember the Chieftain? Sadly for whatever reason things
change. Be it people who make the decisions or the reasons behind
those decisions no longer being relevant.Ectar: I'm sure WG have explained the reasoning why. It's not
for me to defend it. I'm just saying that things change.
Remember server roaming was coming and now it's not? Remember
quake engine coming? Remember the Chieftain? Sadly for
whatever reason things change. Be it people who make the decisions
or the reasons behind those decisions no longer being relevant.
jabster, on 31 March 2017 - 08:01 PM, said: So basically WG can promise anything to get players to part with
their money but if they see an opportunity to make a quick buck
then it's fine to throw that out of the window. Well all I can say
is I'm glad I stopped spending money on this game as this a new low
even by WG's normally low standards.Ectar: Because the Mutant doesn't have the same aura/hype as the
Hype 59? Perhaps it could be a prize in future contests?
Again
Panzerstaale, on 31 March 2017 - 08:02 PM, said: Then explain the difference between the two? Why not put the
"Mutant" as a contest prize, and sell the Type 59 instead?Ectar:
Ectar, on 31 March 2017 - 07:59 PM, said: Sadly for whatever reason things change. Be it people who make the
decisions or the reasons behind those decisions no longer being
relevant.Ectar:
Subject: M6A2E1 aka The Mutant
Link on message: #14059575
jabster, on 31 March 2017 - 07:55 PM, said: What exactly has changed that they need to sell a tank that
was originally sold with the tag line that it wouldn't be available
again?
BravelyRanAway, on 31 March 2017 - 07:30 PM, said: You left out...money. (That moment when €27-30 million a month
isn't enough)

Link on message: #14059575
jabster, on 31 March 2017 - 07:55 PM, said: What exactly has changed that they need to sell a tank that
was originally sold with the tag line that it wouldn't be available
again?Ectar: That perhaps less that 1k were sold at the start, and in the
6 years since those players supported the game, the tank is maybe
only used by less that 100? I'm sure WG have explained the
reasoning why. It's not for me to defend it. I'm just saying
that things change. Remember server roaming was coming and
now it's not? Remember quake engine coming? Remember the Chieftain?
Sadly for whatever reason things change. Be it people who
make the decisions or the reasons behind those decisions no longer
being relevant.
BravelyRanAway, on 31 March 2017 - 07:30 PM, said: You left out...money. (That moment when €27-30 million a month
isn't enough)Ectar: Income doesn't equal profit. Dear god I don't
understand how figures like this still come up and people act like
they know the costs involved in running a global company with good
few thousand of employees across at least 8 different locations.
Subject: M6A2E1 aka The Mutant
Link on message: #14059543
chuckbullet, on 31 March 2017 - 07:36 PM, said: In principle I don't disagree with your argument except
Victor said the following and he should hold strong to his word:
"... there is a special tank for each of these pre-order packages
and you will never, ever, get this tank in the future. So
only preorders, those people will get those tanks. ....
never.. never... Totally exclusive." Source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjrcccTN-HQ
There's no point trying to confuse right and wrong, when a
CEO says an absolute then he really ought to stick to his
principles or at the very least offer a fair and reasonable
compensation due to circumstances changing. In this case the
only change of circumstances is wanting to cash in on more sales.
jabster, on 31 March 2017 - 07:46 PM, said: That all sounds fine and dandy except when you realise that
the reason WG are doing this is for the money and not only that
they're dressing it up as dong it as a favour for the players.
Coal_fighter, on 31 March 2017 - 07:46 PM, said: Why not just put the 59 on sale instead? They would still make a
crapload of money and not piss off the " Old Boys " that pre-order
this tank, make no sense to me.
Link on message: #14059543
chuckbullet, on 31 March 2017 - 07:36 PM, said: In principle I don't disagree with your argument except
Victor said the following and he should hold strong to his word:
"... there is a special tank for each of these pre-order packages
and you will never, ever, get this tank in the future. So
only preorders, those people will get those tanks. ....
never.. never... Totally exclusive." Source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjrcccTN-HQ
There's no point trying to confuse right and wrong, when a
CEO says an absolute then he really ought to stick to his
principles or at the very least offer a fair and reasonable
compensation due to circumstances changing. In this case the
only change of circumstances is wanting to cash in on more sales.Ectar: I'm not confusing right and wrong. I'm saying things change
and Victor from 2011 could never have known what WoT in 2017 would
be. Did he say it? Yes. Should he have said it?
Probably not. Are WG now selling it? Yes.
I personally don't care either way. There is preorders from other
games I came into later that I wish I new about. The value of
something is what I decide as it's me who will be paying the money.
Personally I won't be picking up the mutant however I can see
the appeal to some players. I'm pretty sure however the majority of
players won't touch it consider the Patriot, Liberte and Skorpion
were all recently available too.
jabster, on 31 March 2017 - 07:46 PM, said: That all sounds fine and dandy except when you realise that
the reason WG are doing this is for the money and not only that
they're dressing it up as dong it as a favour for the players.Ectar: True, but then every single time any other premium is
available for a limited time (patriot, liberte, Skorpion etc etc)
that's not a favor for the players. At it's core this
is still a game created to generate money and the vast vast
majority of players will never spend a penny. Money has to come
from somewhere and well, you don't have to buy it if you don't want
to. I honestly doubt matches will be flooded with them.
Coal_fighter, on 31 March 2017 - 07:46 PM, said: Why not just put the 59 on sale instead? They would still make a
crapload of money and not piss off the " Old Boys " that pre-order
this tank, make no sense to me.Ectar: Because you then lose a desirable goal for contests etc. The
main draw of the Type 59 is that it's not commonly available. It's
desirable because it's hard to get.
Subject: M6A2E1 aka The Mutant
Link on message: #14059445
Johnny_M41A_, on 31 March 2017 - 11:29 AM, said: I brought into the closed beta with the Sims that was
advertised an early access package ship for testers and was not
going to be sold again but it was. Still don't mind as
im glad other people can have fun with what was a great little
destroyer.
Link on message: #14059445
Johnny_M41A_, on 31 March 2017 - 11:29 AM, said: I brought into the closed beta with the Sims that was
advertised an early access package ship for testers and was not
going to be sold again but it was. Still don't mind as
im glad other people can have fun with what was a great little
destroyer. Ectar: The pre-order ships in World of Warships were always
advertised as being exclusive for a period of 1 year only from
release. This was made clear to World of Warships players from the
start as it was the same rules/plan following on from World of
Warplanes (As they didn't want a repeat lock out like what happened
with the WoT tanks). The thing people need to remember here
however is that things can change. We might not like that but it's
always a possibility. What's said by almost anyone on anything
can change at a later date due to new information, direction,
opinion, desire, or point of view. You can love something now
and hate it later. You can say you'll never do XYZ and find
out in a few weeks it's actually quite good fun. Companies
can say they won't release ABC product and then suddenly there are
4 models on the market. Companies can pull out of markets all
together to focus on a different project. It's a changing
world and whilst we don't always agree with how it changes around
us, we have to make do with it the best we can. It won't always
change based on how the individual wants it to be. Yes,
thing were said in the past and at that time I have no doubt that
was 100% how things were at that time. Heck to me it was always a
100% this won't happen and I'm sure you can find quotes of me on
the forums saying so in the past. Regarding the pre-order
tanks specifically however that was 6 years ago and I'm pretty sure
this decision wouldn't have been made without first checking the
servers to see just how many of these tanks are still played and
how many players it will affect. TLDR - It's always a
mistake to say something absolute in the gaming industry as no one
can really predict what games will explode or fizzle out. No one
can predict what new technology will kick off and which ones will
fall. Sometimes things will change that aren't great.
Sometimes things change that are totally awesome. And well,
sometimes things change that don't really make a difference to the
majority of us.
Subject: Circon's moderators
Link on message: #13997115
SirTogII, on 11 February 2017 - 01:34 AM, said: Secondly, it's not advertising a competitor mentioning that another
person has made a video of content that Circ hasn't covered (at
least not yet). They attract very different audiences and it would
be the same as saying discussing Lionel Messi in a Chelsea pub
would be an act of treason and get you banned from Stamford bridge.
Ridiculous.
Link on message: #13997115
SirTogII, on 11 February 2017 - 01:34 AM, said: Secondly, it's not advertising a competitor mentioning that another
person has made a video of content that Circ hasn't covered (at
least not yet). They attract very different audiences and it would
be the same as saying discussing Lionel Messi in a Chelsea pub
would be an act of treason and get you banned from Stamford bridge.
Ridiculous. Ectar: In Twitch chat, it's always regarding as bad
form/shady/rude/wrong to direct people from that channel to another
streamer or youtuber. Why? Because no mater how you want to twist
it, if the channels are not partnered in any way, you're driving
viewers from one channel to another. It's one of the biggest no
no's in Twitch and almost every single established Twitch channel
has in their rules "Don't promote/advertise other other streamers"
- It's a straight up shitty thing to do. Ok, QB has a video
that Circon doesn't have. But you're still essentially saying to
Circon's viewers "Hey, go look at QB's content". No one is
saying you can't have your favourite content creators. If you
want to promote them, use forums, use reddit, use your
Twitter/Facebook - Just don't do it on what's essentially a rival
content creator's platform. You're lucky the downvote button
was removed. After Spidey's most recent I'd imagine this would
have happened to your post
Subject: Deutsche Clans auf der neuen Weltkarte
Link on message: #13874297
Keyhand, on 14 February 2017 - 06:43 PM, said: Die 20 viewer waren auch alle voll ausm Häuschen 
Link on message: #13874297
Keyhand, on 14 February 2017 - 06:43 PM, said: Die 20 viewer waren auch alle voll ausm Häuschen Ectar: 

Subject: Clan wars and aim bots.
Link on message: #13725357
Joggaman, on 21 January 2017 - 12:50 AM, said: Just because your commander was caught cheating, doesnt mean
everybody else are.
Link on message: #13725357
Joggaman, on 21 January 2017 - 12:50 AM, said: Just because your commander was caught cheating, doesnt mean
everybody else are.Ectar: Savage 

Subject: WGLEU: the Road to The Grand Finals
Link on message: #13725337
O_verdose, on 21 January 2017 - 01:37 PM, said: Yeah I love watching games of 15 minutes in which 14 minutes
everybody Kemps bush and in the last min there's a mad rush only to
find yourself stuck behind a rock because the map was put together
by a bunch of monkeys who can't do anything but create corridors
and occupy 40-50% of the map with buildings and inaccessible
hills. Get lost Wargaming fools!
Link on message: #13725337
O_verdose, on 21 January 2017 - 01:37 PM, said: Yeah I love watching games of 15 minutes in which 14 minutes
everybody Kemps bush and in the last min there's a mad rush only to
find yourself stuck behind a rock because the map was put together
by a bunch of monkeys who can't do anything but create corridors
and occupy 40-50% of the map with buildings and inaccessible
hills. Get lost Wargaming fools!Ectar: I guess you've not watched in a while since matches are 10
mins a side and only Murovanka has any camping as a strat, yet
that's one of the quickest maps this season so far. .


Subject: WGLEU Season II, week 2
Link on message: #13720270
Mr_Deo, on 20 January 2017 - 12:36 AM, said: If eSports had the same RNG that the in-game client had... Ouch, it
would go through the floor.
Mr_Deo, on 20 January 2017 - 12:36 AM, said: WG needs to work with ESL and make League maps that are 100%
balanced for both sides.. (Or, find a pattern where both teams will
play both sides the same amount)... I think the ESL guys are not
doing a bad job at running the thing, Please don't bring people
like QB or Rita on to give commentary tho, I know why they do that
but it is not a great thing to do.
Link on message: #13720270
Mr_Deo, on 20 January 2017 - 12:36 AM, said: If eSports had the same RNG that the in-game client had... Ouch, it
would go through the floor.Ectar: The RNG is the same. Nothing is changed for the esports,
they don't play on a different client or server. The only
difference is that premium ammo is more used as players want more
reliable penetrations. Premium consumables are also used all
the time and no one complains about that. It's not even
that every shot fired is premium, the Batchat 25's for example
rarely use premium ammo. It comes down to range and what
you're shooting at. There is skill in knowing what shells to
use and when. It's not just load premium and win.
Mr_Deo, on 20 January 2017 - 12:36 AM, said: WG needs to work with ESL and make League maps that are 100%
balanced for both sides.. (Or, find a pattern where both teams will
play both sides the same amount)... I think the ESL guys are not
doing a bad job at running the thing, Please don't bring people
like QB or Rita on to give commentary tho, I know why they do that
but it is not a great thing to do.Ectar: The Wargaming League has been running for at least 4 year.
QB & Jingles were part of the casting team for a single Grand
Finals. That was an experiment to tap into respective
audiences who perhaps didn't know much about esports and It worked
to a certain extent. All other times the casting team for Season
Finals, Regular Season and Grand Finals have either been normal
casters, ex pro-players or WG staff. I appreciate people have
reservations about the amount of games Jingles has played recently
on his account, but with Quickybaby you can't discount his game
knowledge of the vehicles. Tactically his knowledge of
esports may not be there (I honestly have no idea how much he
follows esports) but as someone with extremely high knowledge of
the game and vehicles, you can't dismiss that and it's always good
to have a wide variety of input on something like an analyst desk.
I feel there is room for people like QB, Circonflexes,
perhaps even Foch at events. It just needs to be handled properly
and they in turn need to be serious about wanting to take part. As
I've learned myself it's not easy to just jump right into casting
(either play by play or colour/analysis) without proper prep.
I agree that if someone shows no interest in esports or is
pretty dismissive about it, then having them at an event wouldn't
work. Again there needs to be an obvious desire from
personalities to actually want to participate and show they've done
their homework. At the end of the day everyone
involved loves playing this game so when we all work together to
promote it, only good can come from that.
Subject: WTF is this?
Link on message: #13708025
Link on message: #13708025
Ectar: http://wiki.wargamin...Matchmaker_(WoT) Vehicle
Weight Once enough candidates for a certain battle tier are found,
the matchmaker tries to form two teams from them. For this purpose
each vehicle is assigned a certain weight, and the matchmaker tries
to keep the weight of both teams as equal as possible. Weighting is
performed by vehicle tier and vehicle type, some vehicles are
individually weighted, and for some vehicles there are special
restrictions. Sadly "type" of vehicle isn't always a
balance. So you're not going to get equal balance of heavies
mediums or TD's on each side per tier. 1 team could have
heavier top tier tanks and then lower tier lights, whilst the other
team has lighter top tiers and then heavier lower tiers
(happened to me last night and thought our team would lose
for sure, we instead won only losing 3 tanks). You got
unlucky with your team, RNG of matchmaker sadly. Panther 8.8
being 2nd top damage when your team has a Jagd pz 100, AMX50b, Bat
Chat arty, T-10, Ferdinand and Jagdtiger- That tells it's own
story. Enemy STB appears to have carried with the T-10 and
the 2 arty helping them. All other damage is "meh" really. Serene
Coast is a good map for the STB if it gets good positioning.
Subject: The WGL Fantasy League
Link on message: #13707980
Gemoroj, on 17 January 2017 - 09:17 PM, said: Funny, but sad So why WG didn't announce it in March?
For sure its not equal conditions for players
joining now having disadvantage about 8000 fantasy league points
I'm not talking about commentators contest, but
fighting for main prizes
Link on message: #13707980
Gemoroj, on 17 January 2017 - 09:17 PM, said: Funny, but sad So why WG didn't announce it in March?
For sure its not equal conditions for players
joining now having disadvantage about 8000 fantasy league points
Ectar: Atm every team is capable of defeating each other and there
is no clear "dominant" team. Ding have swapped out a player
but lost their first game. They should be the strongest on paper.
It's easy enough to make up points with only missing our
first week of matches.
Subject: The WGL Fantasy League
Link on message: #13705552
Flaficasti_Oblacic, on 17 January 2017 - 11:28 AM, said: Geee tnx for late info
League start date Tuesday,
January 3, 2017 Typical WG EU
Link on message: #13705552
Flaficasti_Oblacic, on 17 January 2017 - 11:28 AM, said: Geee tnx for late info Ectar: The teams Daki, Mojo and I chose were done after the first
week. That way anyone joining between now and the 19th when it's
the next match day will have a fair chance of beating us/joining
in.
Subject: Do you guys think its fair, That the Elite, Be rewarded the best machines?.
Link on message: #13659019
cragarion, on 05 January 2017 - 12:55 PM, said: That is a players post, i could post anything i liked it
does not make it an official WG announcement, and the link wherever
it goes is for the north american servers not ours so i didn't even
bother to open it. AGAIN Show where WG states that the CW
reward tank is a UNIQUE CW REWARD and will NEVER BE PUT ON SALE and
ill admit i was wrong and shut up about it.
cragarion, on 05 January 2017 - 01:41 PM, said: That was not an Official WG announcement, that is someone
who worked for WG answering a post in the forums, posts like that
have been known to be wrong. I want to see the Official WG
Announcement where WG States they are unique rewards and will never
be put on sale, show the me link in announcements, show me the
link in news, show me the in the CW announcements rules prizes or
whatever, come on out of all the CW's and that there have
been it can't be that hard to find one official post created by WG.
Block Quote It’s a promotion or prize vehicleThat is, not premium in any respect, it is not possible to buy them with gold at all or in any way.Therefore you can only get it by taking part in the global map campaign
Link on message: #13659019
cragarion, on 05 January 2017 - 12:55 PM, said: That is a players post, i could post anything i liked it
does not make it an official WG announcement, and the link wherever
it goes is for the north american servers not ours so i didn't even
bother to open it. AGAIN Show where WG states that the CW
reward tank is a UNIQUE CW REWARD and will NEVER BE PUT ON SALE and
ill admit i was wrong and shut up about it.Ectar: You know fine well I was a WG employee at the time of
posting that. The only difference to a portal announcement
and someone posting on the forums is that one of the content team
members add it to the website. It doesn't come with any more
authority.
cragarion, on 05 January 2017 - 01:41 PM, said: That was not an Official WG announcement, that is someone
who worked for WG answering a post in the forums, posts like that
have been known to be wrong. I want to see the Official WG
Announcement where WG States they are unique rewards and will never
be put on sale, show the me link in announcements, show me the
link in news, show me the in the CW announcements rules prizes or
whatever, come on out of all the CW's and that there have
been it can't be that hard to find one official post created by WG.Ectar: Got any examples of "posts like that which have known to be
wrong?". I'm expecting something along "I think there was" or "I'm
sure you said" without any source links. Every post I've ever
done during my time as a Community Manager or Coordinator regarding
vehicle availability was always verified with the production team
and the information was correct at the time of posting.
NA portal announcement on the new First
Clan Wars Campaign (can't find the EU one, it was a good few years
ago) the video is sadly removed now (no idea why) but you can find
the transcript here
Block Quote It’s a promotion or prize vehicleThat is, not premium in any respect, it is not possible to buy them with gold at all or in any way.Therefore you can only get it by taking part in the global map campaign
Ectar: You can find multiple examples of WG employees posting on
forums in EU, NA, SEA and RU advising players that the Clan Wars
reward tanks are for completing Clan Wars content. You'll find zero
saying they're available via other means. This is basically
where we are: "I want an M60, 121B, T95E6, Obj 907 or VK72.01(K)
how do I get one?" "You need to participate a Clan Wars
campaign such as Steel Corrida and score high enough. It's
a reward for doing well in the campaign " "Is there any other
way to get those tanks?" "Nope, there has never been any posts or
articles to say they'll be available by other means. Multiple
WG employees have confirmed in person, in Q&A's and on the
forums that Clan Wars is the only way to get them" You -"Ok, well
as there isn't a specific portal article saying these tanks are
only ever going to be available from Clan Wars. I'm going to take
that as it's still possible they'll be sold at some point or
available via in-game missions" Impossible discussion there
dude. You're totally blinkered to what the reality is because
you're so focused on wanting a different answer. The tier X
Clan Wars tanks are a reward and encouragement for players to
participate in Clan Wars. Just like tier 19 armour sets in
World of Warcraft are reward for killing the bosses in the latest
raid "The Nighthold". Just like the Victorious Skins for
League of Legends come with ranking gold or higher in a ranked
season. The method of obtaining the reward is as
clear as day. It's an incentive and encouragement to participate in
the contest/event. "But I want it without doing the thing
asked of me" counts for nothing I'm afraid and "It should be
available for everyone" holds zero weight also. Quite simply
"says who?" Who says it has to be fair and obtainable by
everyone? What universal rule means everything in a game has
to be open and achievable by all? Fairness has nothing to do with
it when the god dam reason for the content in the first place
is to encourage players to do a specific objective. - Either get
involved or accept that not everything you want will always be
available to you on your terms.
Subject: Thanks wg for nothing
Link on message: #13627610
Movan03, on 03 January 2017 - 01:16 PM, said: ok lets put it clear and simple for you to stupid to
understand, if you have to do missions,etc, its a reward not
a gift,not free,rest is mostly xmas stuff you buy
as so called presents to yourself or others. wg
dont give you anything free its a reward or they reduce
prices on stuff,so wg stop calling it gifts its a lie.
Link on message: #13627610
Movan03, on 03 January 2017 - 01:16 PM, said: ok lets put it clear and simple for you to stupid to
understand, if you have to do missions,etc, its a reward not
a gift,not free,rest is mostly xmas stuff you buy
as so called presents to yourself or others. wg
dont give you anything free its a reward or they reduce
prices on stuff,so wg stop calling it gifts its a lie. Ectar: What. Were. You. Expecting? And why?
Subject: Thanks wg for nothing
Link on message: #13627600
Movan03, on 03 January 2017 - 11:12 AM, said: WG give you nothing but your happy getting nothing then
grats you make wg very happy .
Movan03, on 03 January 2017 - 11:24 AM, said: from my company i work for i was given free bottles of
wine and gift cards, true gifts,sorry wg your russian
idea of xmas isnt mine thanks.
Movan03, on 03 January 2017 - 11:34 AM, said: besides the one i work for 2 others i dont work for gave me
presents thanks. i have no connection other than being
on hello basis so true free nice gifts ,very nice !.
Link on message: #13627600
Movan03, on 03 January 2017 - 11:12 AM, said: WG give you nothing but your happy getting nothing then
grats you make wg very happy .Ectar: Once again - What were you expecting? And what are you
basing your expectations on?
Movan03, on 03 January 2017 - 11:24 AM, said: from my company i work for i was given free bottles of
wine and gift cards, true gifts,sorry wg your russian
idea of xmas isnt mine thanks.Ectar: And I'm sure the employees of Wargaming got someting from
the company they WORK for.
Movan03, on 03 January 2017 - 11:34 AM, said: besides the one i work for 2 others i dont work for gave me
presents thanks. i have no connection other than being
on hello basis so true free nice gifts ,very nice !.Ectar: Your reasoning still makes no sense. I spent over 200
euro on clothes this year. I got nothing from those companies from
Christmas. I spend hundreds on flights this year. I got
nothing from those airlines from Christmas. I spend hundreds
in Tesco this year on food... I got nothing from them for
Christmas. So. What were you realistically expecting
from Wargaming. Why are you only expecting something from
Wargaming and not say Steam, Ubisoft, EA, Activision? And
again, what did you base your expectations on? You still
haven't really said to anyone why you expected or why you should
get it (and from a free to play game at that).
Subject: Thanks wg for nothing
Link on message: #13626872
Movan03, on 03 January 2017 - 10:17 AM, said: Thanks wg for nothing even over xmas we used to get
a stupid tank we could sell,even some premium
time,now this xmas tree and tank festive thing just shows you
get nothing from wg its all a cash grab,so grats
you get nothing from me in future tight wads.
Link on message: #13626872
Movan03, on 03 January 2017 - 10:17 AM, said: Thanks wg for nothing even over xmas we used to get
a stupid tank we could sell,even some premium
time,now this xmas tree and tank festive thing just shows you
get nothing from wg its all a cash grab,so grats
you get nothing from me in future tight wads.Ectar: Well, what were you expecting? And what are you basing your
expectations on?
Subject: Holiday Ops
Link on message: #13526992
TheSpearman, on 15 December 2016 - 03:04 PM, said: It's a dry run of a loot crate sytem, much like Warships already
has. Even with the supposed generosity, there's an ulterior motive.
Link on message: #13526992
TheSpearman, on 15 December 2016 - 03:04 PM, said: It's a dry run of a loot crate sytem, much like Warships already
has. Even with the supposed generosity, there's an ulterior motive.Ectar: In Warships you get crates for Exp earned in-game. You
don't lose Exp to open a crate. You can either go for a fixed
specific reward depending on your desires, or gamble for
potentially better reward. These include up to 250 flags (one of
which gives 333% crew xp boost) or even premium ships. Getting just
1 crate barely requires that many games played. The crate
system in Warships is literately free stuff for just playing.
And you want to draw a negative from it? If Tanks had
that system, it would be awesome. This is a cool and
new system for Tanks, looking forward to seeing what else comes
from it
Subject: Front Line News and Fair Play Policy
Link on message: #13451106
Tidal_Force, on 01 December 2016 - 10:40 AM, said: I for one, don't care who does the censoring, it's all the same for
me: abuse of power intended to control the masses.
Link on message: #13451106
Tidal_Force, on 01 December 2016 - 10:40 AM, said: I for one, don't care who does the censoring, it's all the same for
me: abuse of power intended to control the masses.Ectar: And on the flip side you have abuse of a voice intended to
incite the masses. You have freedom of speech in a way to say
what you want on the internet, but you don't have the freedom to
say stuff "wherever" you want on the internet. People
also have the freedom to not listen to that speech which is why
certain places have limitations on what can be said and where.
Subject: Front Line News and Fair Play Policy
Link on message: #13450870
Lowered, on 30 November 2016 - 11:29 PM, said: There's a little thing called "Freedom of speech", and you idiots
cannot understand the difference between "naming and shaming" and
"spreading the word about cheaters".
dasBOT, on 01 December 2016 - 10:04 AM, said: They cleaned up Paris office ones, they can do it again
Link on message: #13450870
Lowered, on 30 November 2016 - 11:29 PM, said: There's a little thing called "Freedom of speech", and you idiots
cannot understand the difference between "naming and shaming" and
"spreading the word about cheaters".Ectar: Wait woah woah woah. Freedom of speech is something commonly
thrown about on the internet with people not knowing what the hell
they're talking about. It seems to mainly stem from any
American mentioning the First Amendment which in the USA is a
right for people to put across their opinions and ideas without the
government censoring them.
In other countries world wide the term "Freedom of Speech" has very different standards regarding what's acceptable or not. The majority of them don't allow national, racial or ethical targeting. (like for example deliberately trying to upset a nation of people by using common ethnic slurs). Freedom of Speech is not a free pass to say whatever you want and act like there is no repercussions or subject that is out of limits. Now this forums is not administered by the government of any country. Your access to these forums is not a right, it's a privilege granted by a private entity based upon you accepting and following rules and guidelines set by that entity. If you disagree with those rules you're free to stop posting. Sorry to chime in with this, but when people name drop "freedom of speech" pretty much most have no idea what that term actually covers them for (and that's before we get into the many differences the term covers depending on which country you are based).
In other countries world wide the term "Freedom of Speech" has very different standards regarding what's acceptable or not. The majority of them don't allow national, racial or ethical targeting. (like for example deliberately trying to upset a nation of people by using common ethnic slurs). Freedom of Speech is not a free pass to say whatever you want and act like there is no repercussions or subject that is out of limits. Now this forums is not administered by the government of any country. Your access to these forums is not a right, it's a privilege granted by a private entity based upon you accepting and following rules and guidelines set by that entity. If you disagree with those rules you're free to stop posting. Sorry to chime in with this, but when people name drop "freedom of speech" pretty much most have no idea what that term actually covers them for (and that's before we get into the many differences the term covers depending on which country you are based).
dasBOT, on 01 December 2016 - 10:04 AM, said: They cleaned up Paris office ones, they can do it againEctar: No that was a fairy tale story created to cause drama by
someone with a petty agenda. It wasn't even Rita that wrote
the article.
Subject: Front Line News and Fair Play Policy
Link on message: #13446938
Ph3lan, on 30 November 2016 - 03:58 PM, said: Due to the above reasons and because of several other rule breaches
our moderators have recently removed the “front line news” thread
and it won’t return. We will also remove any “clone threads”
created in its stead and will sanction any players creating those
threads as well as any posts that violate our forum rules. Please
remember that the purpose of this section is to discuss clan
related matters and do so in a civilized manner!
Link on message: #13446938
Ph3lan, on 30 November 2016 - 03:58 PM, said: Due to the above reasons and because of several other rule breaches
our moderators have recently removed the “front line news” thread
and it won’t return. We will also remove any “clone threads”
created in its stead and will sanction any players creating those
threads as well as any posts that violate our forum rules. Please
remember that the purpose of this section is to discuss clan
related matters and do so in a civilized manner! Ectar: Question: The Frontline News thread before the recent
drama after the fair use bans was a thread where general Clan Wars
chat and Clan interaction occurred. There was a bit of smack talk
in there but it generally allowed the Clan players to stay
contained in that thread. It was also a very old thread with a lot
of info/history in it. Would a new thread be allowed
for general Clan news that didn't bring up the recent claimed
shenanigans and instead was just like it was previously for the
past 2-3 years?
Subject: Frontline News volume whatever
Link on message: #13445913
mightyBaer, on 30 November 2016 - 01:57 PM, said: 
Link on message: #13445913
mightyBaer, on 30 November 2016 - 01:57 PM, said: 
Ectar: 

Subject: Frontline news v2
Link on message: #13442649
black_powerr, on 29 November 2016 - 10:13 PM, said: as i said its not my problem.wg can kick him ban him
f.. him anyway
in fame you kick all cheater boys? you
have 100 members...
Link on message: #13442649
black_powerr, on 29 November 2016 - 10:13 PM, said: as i said its not my problem.wg can kick him ban him
f.. him anyway Ectar: If they caught someone yes. The Fame clan leader
checked his roster as soon as the bans were announced and was ready
to kick anyone. They don't take shenanigans like that.
Subject: Fair Play Policy: First Actions Taken
Link on message: #13441906
Link on message: #13441906
Ectar: The hell? The forum just erased my entire post and left only the
edited last line?! 
Subject: Frontline news v2
Link on message: #13441755
Link on message: #13441755
Ectar: As a heads up and some friendly advice, don't be a bunch of plums
guys and fill this topic with stuff that will get it closed too.
Basically don't give the mods a reason to sanction you or
this thread. 
Реклама | Adv

















