Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Double XP Before Your Holidays
Link on message: #16440250
Cro006, on 12 December 2018 - 02:04 PM, said: I meant decision makers are blind (devs - because nothing
changes no matter what feedback they get), I didn't say you are
blind, or any forum mod, who just collects reports and sends them
to WG central or whatever it's called. I apologise if I offended
you in any way 
FightingJoe, on 12 December 2018 - 05:34 PM, said: It's farming the damage that gets you into the top 10, as
damage dealt is a huge component of the XP reward. Just try loading
the stock gun on your favorite tank and fire only non-premium
rounds, and see which position you end up in the team table.
Link on message: #16440250
Cro006, on 12 December 2018 - 02:04 PM, said: I meant decision makers are blind (devs - because nothing
changes no matter what feedback they get), I didn't say you are
blind, or any forum mod, who just collects reports and sends them
to WG central or whatever it's called. I apologise if I offended
you in any way eekeeboo: Thank-you for the clarification and no offense given,
just highlight it's importance to phrase things more carefully
sometimes
FightingJoe, on 12 December 2018 - 05:34 PM, said: It's farming the damage that gets you into the top 10, as
damage dealt is a huge component of the XP reward. Just try loading
the stock gun on your favorite tank and fire only non-premium
rounds, and see which position you end up in the team table.
eekeeboo: Just farming damage doesn't get you the win though
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16440240
Link on message: #16440240
eekeeboo: I wanted to apologise for not keeping up with the thread throughout
the day, please be aware I'll try to catch up with everything
tomorrow, stay on-topic and not breaking rules. I'd rather not have
waves of banning, points and moderation when I come back,
please.
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16440234
Innapropriate_Username, on 12 December 2018 - 06:41 PM, said: You could play Tier10 game normal in Tiger2, each new OP
tank makes it more and more obsolete. That is the reason for
Fantasy buffs to all soviet tanks, and british Centurion turrets,
every tier8 medium tank now has turret STRONGER than E75 on Tier9.
You are turning those old tanks into a Tog2, and if every
tech-tree tank in Tiger (for example) becomes Tog2, only way to
play this game is with new OP premium tanks, because only you claim
that it is "Possible" to play Tiger2 against 252U / IS3A - it is
not, it is suffering and not a game,,,, omg.
Eaglax, on 12 December 2018 - 06:43 PM, said: no... it's like saying, I know how to cut an onion, so I can
make a good guess how to cut potatoes. Or when you still insist on
clinging on my comparison: I know how it feels like when I cut
myself by accident, so I roughly know that shooting myself would
******* hurt. or do you really wanna tell me that tanks are
not comparable by stats?
_LEO_, on 12 December 2018 - 06:45 PM, said: Wait, for what? WG will not nerf prem. tank, so the damage
is ireversible, but we all know why it was done. To sell more
loot... "Holiday boxes". They should have tested this mechanism on
tech tree tank, so that damage can be undone, even after 6 months
of waiting like in the case of 268v4.
Spacecruiser_, on 12 December 2018 - 06:56 PM, said: 
Since when 51,23% global winrate is considered weak? Well of course compared to the monstrosities of 252U and 268V4 of 54%+ it will look weak.
With 51.23% global winrate this means it is balanced. The only thing that was weak was the sales. 30.000 IS-3As on all servers. And this is why you buff it.
Also about "try and bring the tank in line with the equivalent heavies of the tier" Tiger II laughed, cause Tiger II knew.
peregrine, on 12 December 2018 - 06:57 PM, said: I am not sure what kind of statistics you are looking at,
but if the IS-3(A) was quite weak, what do you think are tanks like
the Tiger II, T32, Kv-4, 110 and 65t?
Link on message: #16440234
Innapropriate_Username, on 12 December 2018 - 06:41 PM, said: You could play Tier10 game normal in Tiger2, each new OP
tank makes it more and more obsolete. That is the reason for
Fantasy buffs to all soviet tanks, and british Centurion turrets,
every tier8 medium tank now has turret STRONGER than E75 on Tier9.
You are turning those old tanks into a Tog2, and if every
tech-tree tank in Tiger (for example) becomes Tog2, only way to
play this game is with new OP premium tanks, because only you claim
that it is "Possible" to play Tiger2 against 252U / IS3A - it is
not, it is suffering and not a game,,,, omg. eekeeboo: I have and did and do play the tiger 2 like that. I don't
get the chance to play the tiger 2 often as I'm frequently here on
the forums. I'm not and have never said the Tiger 2 is OP, I'm
saying you can still fight tanks with it. I dream of
more Tog 2's, I love it!
Eaglax, on 12 December 2018 - 06:43 PM, said: no... it's like saying, I know how to cut an onion, so I can
make a good guess how to cut potatoes. Or when you still insist on
clinging on my comparison: I know how it feels like when I cut
myself by accident, so I roughly know that shooting myself would
******* hurt. or do you really wanna tell me that tanks are
not comparable by stats?eekeeboo: No....... I'm sorry but you used the comparison to known and
well-documented instances of an action to inform your judgment as a
comparison to knowing how a heavy tank with a new mechanic for
heavies that you haven't played and haven't seen a lot of evidence
for the performance of. Those are 2 completely different
scenarios. Stats do not tell the whole story of a tank
and its performance.
_LEO_, on 12 December 2018 - 06:45 PM, said: Wait, for what? WG will not nerf prem. tank, so the damage
is ireversible, but we all know why it was done. To sell more
loot... "Holiday boxes". They should have tested this mechanism on
tech tree tank, so that damage can be undone, even after 6 months
of waiting like in the case of 268v4.eekeeboo: As highlighted, Wait.... to inform an opinion. I've been
very clear on this. Form an opinion, form a judgement, but please
do so in an objective and informed manner.
Spacecruiser_, on 12 December 2018 - 06:56 PM, said: 
Since when 51,23% global winrate is considered weak? Well of course compared to the monstrosities of 252U and 268V4 of 54%+ it will look weak.
With 51.23% global winrate this means it is balanced. The only thing that was weak was the sales. 30.000 IS-3As on all servers. And this is why you buff it.
Also about "try and bring the tank in line with the equivalent heavies of the tier" Tiger II laughed, cause Tiger II knew.
eekeeboo: I don't know of anyone who said the old IS-3A was good or
not below average. There's more to a tanks stats for balancing than
over-all winrate on one server region.
peregrine, on 12 December 2018 - 06:57 PM, said: I am not sure what kind of statistics you are looking at,
but if the IS-3(A) was quite weak, what do you think are tanks like
the Tiger II, T32, Kv-4, 110 and 65t? eekeeboo: As mentioned previously WG Fest will announce some of the
updates, changes and balancing that's going to be taking
place.
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16440211
Spacecruiser_, on 12 December 2018 - 05:47 PM, said: Those are eekeeboo's a WG staff words
"We are still collecting feedback, I'm asking about the availability from boxes and store.
For the in-game performance, I personally don't know how it performs, so I can't help there. But it's important people reserve judgment until perhaps they get their hands on it?"
What he meant
"We need to see it on action to see if it is overperforming, and if we conclude that it is too broken, well.... we can't nerf it cause there are laws forbidding us to change something that was bought with real money"
Mister eekeeboo, It took you half a year to nerf tanks like T110E5, Object 268V4, Maus but it only took you half a month to decide to buff a premium tank?
And since various countries have laws that keep your hands tied in terms of nerfing a product that costed real money. Are you really sure and confident to sell it and then get a feedback?
And let's say you do that and collect that feeback, if you find it overperforming, what are you going to do? Nothing. Cause you can't touch it once it becomes available. And we are talking for less that 48 hours.
That looks like a very greedy rushed decision without taking into consideration of the aftermath of your choises. IS-3A buff in this time and i this hurry is just the cheese on the traps called Loot boxes
Link on message: #16440211
Spacecruiser_, on 12 December 2018 - 05:47 PM, said: Those are eekeeboo's a WG staff words"We are still collecting feedback, I'm asking about the availability from boxes and store.
For the in-game performance, I personally don't know how it performs, so I can't help there. But it's important people reserve judgment until perhaps they get their hands on it?"
What he meant
"We need to see it on action to see if it is overperforming, and if we conclude that it is too broken, well.... we can't nerf it cause there are laws forbidding us to change something that was bought with real money"
Mister eekeeboo, It took you half a year to nerf tanks like T110E5, Object 268V4, Maus but it only took you half a month to decide to buff a premium tank?
And since various countries have laws that keep your hands tied in terms of nerfing a product that costed real money. Are you really sure and confident to sell it and then get a feedback?
And let's say you do that and collect that feeback, if you find it overperforming, what are you going to do? Nothing. Cause you can't touch it once it becomes available. And we are talking for less that 48 hours.
That looks like a very greedy rushed decision without taking into consideration of the aftermath of your choises. IS-3A buff in this time and i this hurry is just the cheese on the traps called Loot boxes
eekeeboo: It didn't take me any time to nerf anything, having started
less than 2 weeks ago. As you are now making a point of
paraphrasing things, it's important i'm very clear. No I meant
what I said, if I meant to say what you think I meant to say, I
would have said that not what I did. And it's also
important to ask, what will happen if the feedback is gathered and
after sufficient time the tank is found to be balanced or UP?
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16440173
badabum, on 12 December 2018 - 04:19 PM, said: Community contributors who are mostly trustworthy and
skilled players played it on live streams and they are all
saying the IS-3A is broken because of the overpowered "reverse
auto-reloader" implementation, and the whole community is
up-in-arms about this tank's addition to the game because Wargaming
has a long track record of not nerfing premium tanks once they go
live even after they were proven overpowered. So we feel our only
chance to be heard is now. We like WoT and feel the current
trend of adding broken tanks and mechanics (stun is
another example) is a major factor in the population decline
across all regions, as it makes the game more and more frustrating
instead of being a pleasant distraction after a day's
work. Also asking us to reserve judgement until
after we played it it's unfair because in order to test it we would
need to buy it.
Flaryy, on 12 December 2018 - 04:37 PM, said: So, i´m only allowed to have an opinion after I gave you
money? What a joke this game and this company have become..... WG =
Anticonsumer (which could be whitnessd several times this year,
f.e. premium MM debacle NEVER forgotten! )
Link on message: #16440173
badabum, on 12 December 2018 - 04:19 PM, said: Community contributors who are mostly trustworthy and
skilled players played it on live streams and they are all
saying the IS-3A is broken because of the overpowered "reverse
auto-reloader" implementation, and the whole community is
up-in-arms about this tank's addition to the game because Wargaming
has a long track record of not nerfing premium tanks once they go
live even after they were proven overpowered. So we feel our only
chance to be heard is now. We like WoT and feel the current
trend of adding broken tanks and mechanics (stun is
another example) is a major factor in the population decline
across all regions, as it makes the game more and more frustrating
instead of being a pleasant distraction after a day's
work. Also asking us to reserve judgement until
after we played it it's unfair because in order to test it we would
need to buy it.eekeeboo: And those community contributors are generally the most
capable and able to perform in most vehicles. At the same time,
we've had instances in the past with such claims of OP that ended
up not the case. That's why it's so important people reserve
judgment until we get the full picture and see how it actually
performs. That's all I'm asking, make an informed judgment not a
pre-judgment. I'm not asking you to wait until you own it or buy,
but wait until there's a bigger picture and more opinions from more
people.
Flaryy, on 12 December 2018 - 04:37 PM, said: So, i´m only allowed to have an opinion after I gave you
money? What a joke this game and this company have become..... WG =
Anticonsumer (which could be whitnessd several times this year,
f.e. premium MM debacle NEVER forgotten! )eekeeboo: Please take the time to actually read what is being
said, thank-you.
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16440140
nakkipeppu, on 12 December 2018 - 04:03 PM, said: This works with tech tree tanks, as you can nerf
them. But unless you slap the "Characteristics are subjected to
change after release" - sticker on side of it, judging something
before playing it is the only possible time to judge, as after
people play it, you can really only say "whoops, ****!" If
it's too weak and then you buff it, all you gain is goodwill. If
it's too good, it's all negative for everybody. WHY would
you not err on the side of "maybe slightly weak", and then adjust ?
Link on message: #16440140
nakkipeppu, on 12 December 2018 - 04:03 PM, said: This works with tech tree tanks, as you can nerf
them. But unless you slap the "Characteristics are subjected to
change after release" - sticker on side of it, judging something
before playing it is the only possible time to judge, as after
people play it, you can really only say "whoops, ****!" If
it's too weak and then you buff it, all you gain is goodwill. If
it's too good, it's all negative for everybody. WHY would
you not err on the side of "maybe slightly weak", and then adjust ?eekeeboo: Premiums have been changed in the past. It is generally not
done for obvious reasons but refunds offered. But like the badger
and the issues before release. Many people judged the tank before
release, after release there has been no issue or the "end of the
game" predictions as there was then. The tank was
already quite weak and the recent changes are intended to try and
bring the tank in line with the equivalent heavies of the
tier.
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16440120
Gremlin182, on 12 December 2018 - 02:45 PM, said: Is it not an Autoreloader rather than an autoloader and presumably
the first of its kind. Well the first on a heavy tank and with a
variation to how they work on Mediums. If accepted no doubt we will
see more of this type.
Link on message: #16440120
Gremlin182, on 12 December 2018 - 02:45 PM, said: Is it not an Autoreloader rather than an autoloader and presumably
the first of its kind. Well the first on a heavy tank and with a
variation to how they work on Mediums. If accepted no doubt we will
see more of this type.eekeeboo: There is a chance this mechanic will be added to more
vehicles in the future.
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16440110
AzoreanOutkast, on 12 December 2018 - 01:52 PM, said: After seing this video i must say that im totally 100%
convinced that this tank is gonna have a bigger negative impact on
gameplay that the Obj 268 V4 had when it was released! Im seing
already... When xmas is over lots of them around in MM, then
platoons... Then ppl crying out about it and a few time later on it
comes on sale... WG racks a pretty penny from players, then after a
few months, they nerf it and we see a new "exodus" of players from
game... Sounds really bad doesnt it? I might be crazy... Or
not! But i would say that is the picture im seing, after all the
stats, all the feedback from ppl and after seing this video... OMG!
Anymn, on 12 December 2018 - 02:26 PM, said: Eekeeboo, I know you are supposed to say this as a Wargaming
employee. But please listen to a good, constructive feedback.
IS-3A is OP in the right hands to a way larger extend
than the Defender. That is a fact, and can
be judged very well BEFORE anyone plays the tank. We
are veteran players and we can compare quite easily the statistics of the
current tanks with that of the IS-3A. Is is really not hard to do,
as the stats and tank size is so similar to the tech-tree variant.
Now, what did Wargaming do? Before the Defender entered the game,
the IS-3 was the strongest tank in the game at tier 8. Now, the
IS-3A enhances this IS-3 with a clip of 3 shots, while having
50 higher DPM when the clip is empty - considering the player is
smart enough to mount a vent in the empty gun rammer spot and has
decent crew skills. The shell velocity of the IS-3A is now
substantially better, so you can snipe on moving targets. Now,
what are the drawbacks to have all this? A little less mobility
up-slope and a little less accuracy on long range. But how
does it work out in practice? The IS-3A rolls toward the
front-lines. On the way to go there, he loads a full clip, and
is ready to dish out 1170 damage on the first tanks that are out
there. Now his clip is empty and he can brawl just as
effective as an normal IS-3. Furthermore, the IS-3A will get a
free 390-780 damage worth of shells in the clip when there is no
option for going into action for 20-35 seconds, and can
unleash it in the next encounter. And why is this OP -
definitely compared to Italian tanks? Because that IS-3A is
NEVER weak, as either it has a full clip, or it has a normal
IS-3 reload. But is HAS the benefits of a 3 shell magazine.
Now in the right hands, the IS-3A can easily dominate the enemy in
any brawl, as it has all the benefits of a 3 shot clip, but not the
drawbacks of having to reload. That is what we call OP in this
game. Now: is that a problem? No, it shouldn't be in any
good game development studio. Because when a good game developer
accidentally released an OP tank, they would change it immediately
in the next update. And when it was a premium tank, they
would have stated in the first month of selling it: "Please be
aware that we might change the stats slightly to ensure a balanced
game. No right of money-return is allowed". Now what the
actual problem of WG is, is that they are not admitting that a tank
is OP. And when they do, they say: "Oh, well... We will no longer
sell this tank, okay?". But the damage is then already done, and no
fixes are coming. Furthermore Wargaming is so silent about any
upcoming balance changes - but instead is making jokes in their
video's like 'We are going to sell the Defender'. This proves that
Wargaming knows what they are doing: deliberately making OP premium
tanks and monetizing the p2w elements in this game. Wargaming shows
us this way they are an evil company that compromises there
game for short term gains. And that hurts, because I love this
game and it hurts to see it becoming worse and worse every update -
only because of the greediness of Wargaming.
Link on message: #16440110
AzoreanOutkast, on 12 December 2018 - 01:52 PM, said: After seing this video i must say that im totally 100%
convinced that this tank is gonna have a bigger negative impact on
gameplay that the Obj 268 V4 had when it was released! Im seing
already... When xmas is over lots of them around in MM, then
platoons... Then ppl crying out about it and a few time later on it
comes on sale... WG racks a pretty penny from players, then after a
few months, they nerf it and we see a new "exodus" of players from
game... Sounds really bad doesnt it? I might be crazy... Or
not! But i would say that is the picture im seing, after all the
stats, all the feedback from ppl and after seing this video... OMG!eekeeboo: Im seing already... When xmas is over lots of them around in MM,
then platoons... Then ppl crying out about it and a few time later
on it comes on sale... WG racks a pretty penny from players, then
after a few months, they nerf it and we see a new "exodus" of
players from game... Sounds really bad doesnt it? I might be
crazy... Or not! But i would say that is the picture im seing,
after all the stats, all the feedback from ppl and after seing this
video... OMG! It's important to note where that footage was
from.
Anymn, on 12 December 2018 - 02:26 PM, said: Eekeeboo, I know you are supposed to say this as a Wargaming
employee. But please listen to a good, constructive feedback.
IS-3A is OP in the right hands to a way larger extend
than the Defender. That is a fact, and can
be judged very well BEFORE anyone plays the tank. We
are veteran players and we can compare quite easily the statistics of the
current tanks with that of the IS-3A. Is is really not hard to do,
as the stats and tank size is so similar to the tech-tree variant.
Now, what did Wargaming do? Before the Defender entered the game,
the IS-3 was the strongest tank in the game at tier 8. Now, the
IS-3A enhances this IS-3 with a clip of 3 shots, while having
50 higher DPM when the clip is empty - considering the player is
smart enough to mount a vent in the empty gun rammer spot and has
decent crew skills. The shell velocity of the IS-3A is now
substantially better, so you can snipe on moving targets. Now,
what are the drawbacks to have all this? A little less mobility
up-slope and a little less accuracy on long range. But how
does it work out in practice? The IS-3A rolls toward the
front-lines. On the way to go there, he loads a full clip, and
is ready to dish out 1170 damage on the first tanks that are out
there. Now his clip is empty and he can brawl just as
effective as an normal IS-3. Furthermore, the IS-3A will get a
free 390-780 damage worth of shells in the clip when there is no
option for going into action for 20-35 seconds, and can
unleash it in the next encounter. And why is this OP -
definitely compared to Italian tanks? Because that IS-3A is
NEVER weak, as either it has a full clip, or it has a normal
IS-3 reload. But is HAS the benefits of a 3 shell magazine.
Now in the right hands, the IS-3A can easily dominate the enemy in
any brawl, as it has all the benefits of a 3 shot clip, but not the
drawbacks of having to reload. That is what we call OP in this
game. Now: is that a problem? No, it shouldn't be in any
good game development studio. Because when a good game developer
accidentally released an OP tank, they would change it immediately
in the next update. And when it was a premium tank, they
would have stated in the first month of selling it: "Please be
aware that we might change the stats slightly to ensure a balanced
game. No right of money-return is allowed". Now what the
actual problem of WG is, is that they are not admitting that a tank
is OP. And when they do, they say: "Oh, well... We will no longer
sell this tank, okay?". But the damage is then already done, and no
fixes are coming. Furthermore Wargaming is so silent about any
upcoming balance changes - but instead is making jokes in their
video's like 'We are going to sell the Defender'. This proves that
Wargaming knows what they are doing: deliberately making OP premium
tanks and monetizing the p2w elements in this game. Wargaming shows
us this way they are an evil company that compromises there
game for short term gains. And that hurts, because I love this
game and it hurts to see it becoming worse and worse every update -
only because of the greediness of Wargaming. eekeeboo: I can assure you that we are all listening to the feedback,
it's all being gathered and passed on. But it is just as important
for players to withhold judgment on a tanks behaviour and
performance until they either get their hands on it or have seen it
in action more frequently than the current rare instances.
There's more to a tank than just straight up stats, tanks
like the Chrysler for instance should highlight this to you. I want
to be clear though I appreciate the constructive and well phrased
way you have structured your reply. For upcoming
changes, I've shared as frequently as I can the announcements due
at WG fest that I'm excited for. I will add for the
IS3 being most OP tank at tier 8? my 50-100 would like a word with
you... and the 13-90 and the ISU-152 etc
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16440079
Infektid, on 12 December 2018 - 01:10 PM, said: Guys dont bash to much on eekeeboo after all this was said by
a dev about the Object 268 v4 after the release...
Q: How is the Obj. 268 V4 doing?
A: There are a lot of voices, both good and bad, but that means that the tank is balanced. A nerf is improbable, but a buff very possible
https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2018/03/03/wot-qa-stream-02-03-2018/#more-63230
This is how out of touch they are from their own game....
Lethul, on 12 December 2018 - 01:26 PM, said: Maybe we can read and have basing understanding about ingame
mechanics? I does not take experience of a tank to realize it is
broken. I knew for a fact that obj 268v4 was broken on release yet
I had never played it. It's to bad that WG employees don't
seem to have any grasp about their own game tbh. 13:27 Added after
1 minute What are you talking about? Should we just sit and
happily look them implement broken stuff and not complain until it
is released and irreversable. What point does that serve?
cro001, on 12 December 2018 - 01:30 PM, said: Why? Because he keeps saying that our opinions are not worth
a damn because we don't own it? I myself I'm not gambling on loot
boxes just to prove my point.
Infektid, on 12 December 2018 - 01:31 PM, said: Guys haven't you realized that any criticism and poiting out the
obvious fact that this tank will be beyond broken in certain game
modes is seing as "destructive" and just brushed aside.....
Use this thread to vent your frustations because NOTHING will be done.
But don't worry you will have new shiny cammos for your tanks for the amazing price of 49.99.... 13:33 Added after 2 minutes Because he is a nobody on WG's chain of command (no disrespect for the person)... he will get the flak but in the end nothing will be changed because the criticism stops on his level.
Link on message: #16440079
Infektid, on 12 December 2018 - 01:10 PM, said: Guys dont bash to much on eekeeboo after all this was said by
a dev about the Object 268 v4 after the release...
Q: How is the Obj. 268 V4 doing?A: There are a lot of voices, both good and bad, but that means that the tank is balanced. A nerf is improbable, but a buff very possible
https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2018/03/03/wot-qa-stream-02-03-2018/#more-63230
This is how out of touch they are from their own game....
eekeeboo: I'm like a maus with spall liner to
arty!
I understand the frustration
and opinions, I really do. But it's always important to be
objective and not have reactions like that for the Chrysler.
Lethul, on 12 December 2018 - 01:26 PM, said: Maybe we can read and have basing understanding about ingame
mechanics? I does not take experience of a tank to realize it is
broken. I knew for a fact that obj 268v4 was broken on release yet
I had never played it. It's to bad that WG employees don't
seem to have any grasp about their own game tbh. 13:27 Added after
1 minute What are you talking about? Should we just sit and
happily look them implement broken stuff and not complain until it
is released and irreversable. What point does that serve?eekeeboo: What are you talking about? Should we just sit and happily
look them implement broken stuff and not complain until it is
released and irreversable. What point does that serve? Many
people with understanding have claimed broken tanks of doom or
broken tanks of never getting played in the past. Once they got to
the server, this was not the case (Chrysler, badger, ELC Even), yes
there are instances where it was also the case. But that's why it's
important to wait and see what the actual performance turns out to
be. And no, it was stated that it's simply better to
have an informed opinion and a prejudged statement.
cro001, on 12 December 2018 - 01:30 PM, said: Why? Because he keeps saying that our opinions are not worth
a damn because we don't own it? I myself I'm not gambling on loot
boxes just to prove my point.eekeeboo: Please read the whole text, not just read the first few
words and ignore the rest. It also pays to read everything I state
and not just the parts you want to. At no stage did I say you
should gamble and at no point did I say your opinion is worthless.
Please take the time to actually read what is being typed.
Thank-you.
Infektid, on 12 December 2018 - 01:31 PM, said: Guys haven't you realized that any criticism and poiting out the
obvious fact that this tank will be beyond broken in certain game
modes is seing as "destructive" and just brushed aside.....
Use this thread to vent your frustations because NOTHING will be done.
But don't worry you will have new shiny cammos for your tanks for the amazing price of 49.99.... 13:33 Added after 2 minutes Because he is a nobody on WG's chain of command (no disrespect for the person)... he will get the flak but in the end nothing will be changed because the criticism stops on his level.
eekeeboo: Because he is a nobody on WG's chain of command (no
disrespect for the person)... he will get the flak but in the end
nothing will be changed because the criticism stops on his level.
That's not entirely true the feedback is always being passed
upwards, but yes, I do not get to make the decisions on balancing
and other things. I'll comment now, it's been a busy
day and I'm now replying out of work. I've already watched the
video, I also watched the stream. I will say that as you can see
it's a capable tank, but at the end of the day.... skill is a
player who is capable of getting the best out of most tanks and
understands the game very well. He knows the mechanics very well
and knows when to engage and when not to etc. I'm sure you've seen
yourself his abilities in most premiums. I will also ask you to
watch more reviews, in particular, those highlighting the
differences between vehicles. Such instances will show poor engine
power, stock IS3 turret, poor view range, terrible accuracy and
doesn't aim well on the move either. This means in the long-range
engagements this tank is very easily bullied and penetrated by many
tanks. I don't need anyone to come to my rescue, but
thank-you for the suggestion.
Subject: Presto in arrivo sul Supertest: Minsk ribilanciata
Link on message: #16440056
Link on message: #16440056
Sael_:
Molto presto cominceremo il test chiuso di
una nuova versione della mappa Minsk. La seconda versione è di
taglia più piccola (900x900 metri), con i punti d'azione principali
spostati. Questi cambiamenti renderanno giocare presso la parte
aperta della mappa più eccitante per i veicoli mobili e
incrementeranno l'importanza delle attività di avvistamento. Il
numero di oggetti distruttibili in grado di avere un impatto sugli
scontri a fuoco diminuirà significativamente. 





Distanze più corte
contribuiranno a sinergizzare le direzioni da prendere in
battaglia, creando più opzioni tattiche e variegando le battaglie.
I blocchi cittadini in questa fase di test sono molto lontani dalla
configurazione finale e verranno sistemati a seconda dei risultati.
Una volta che raccoglieremo le informazioni necessarie, decideremo
quale sarà il destino di questa mappa. Continuate a seguire le
notizie! Buona fortuna in battaglia e buone feste!
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16440023
VarzA, on 12 December 2018 - 12:42 PM, said: Here's feedback, and you need to accept it as statement from
our point of view (backed by stats as well). 268 4 is still
overperforming, 252U is massively overperforming, 430U is
overperforming, LT-432 is a monster. Both of the 2 campaign
missions end with a t10 russian heavy tank. The common thread seems
to be russian tanks. There has never been a point in history where
the russian tech tree has been bad, it has almost always been
overall good or exceptional. I (as a player), do not want a
binary choice of playing russian tanks, or playing other tanks and
having a handicap. I am worried this is the trend this game has
been on for the past 2yrs, and from my point of view (and that of
many in this thread), the IS-3A just confirms it further. I
hope my post was constructive enough. I did not say
arrogance. I hope WG will allow ppl to use 7d free trial for the
IS-3A soon, i am not investing the kind of money one needs to
ensure i get it in lootboxes.
Innapropriate_Username, on 12 December 2018 - 12:43 PM, said: I have it. I am playing it. It is beyond broken on
Defender level, maybe even more. How do tanks like Tiger2 in same
tier fight against this thing? Defender + IS3A on one side, and
Tiger2 and Panther on other side - something here is broken OP.
_Davidge_, on 12 December 2018 - 12:43 PM, said: For those who thonk this will make IS 3A OP please remember again
it has 520 HP engine it is slugish. Regular IS 3 has 700 hp.
DaddysLittlePrincess, on 12 December 2018 - 12:43 PM, said: But they're not constructive anymore. Feedback in supertest
forum thread was constructive, but it was ignored. No post can be
constructive now as WG decided to put this broken mechanic in most
broken way on premium tank, which can't be nerfed
anymore. It would be OK to put the mechanic on tech
tree/reward tank, as they can be adjusted in the future. But this
decision was made simply to milk most money from loot boxes, as
many people already have Defender, e25 and lefh.
chuao, on 12 December 2018 - 12:50 PM, said: I want IS-3A and IS-3A (B) black edition!!!
ChimPANGzee, on 12 December 2018 - 12:50 PM, said: I am so thoroughly and remarkably disappointed about the
"reimagining" of the IS-3A that I am compelled to go to the forums.
This is, without a doubt, the strongest heavy tank in the
game tier to tier. As many have mentioned it's "estimated dpm" is
grossly skewed, it is remarkably dishonest and does not inspire the
confidence from the community that you clearly need for this game
to keep going. Suggesting that this tank is anything but
extremely overpowered, or denying that this will essentially ruin
team play at tier VIII (Strongholds, Team Battles or Clan
Wars), is nothing short of blatant lying and a big slap to the
face. Many of us who play this game have supported the
company over many years, some spend more than 100 € every
year. It leaves a real bitter taste when you pull a stunt such as
this one, and it saddens me to see a game I like so much get ruined
by greed (for I can see no other reason behind this decision; if
there is one please share). I hope that you back track this
change promptly and go back to the drawing board (the idea is
interesting but this execution is disastrous), yet I have no
expectation what so ever that you will. Please prove me
wrong. Please show us that you can get the best out of your
creative and competent employees. Please show us that you hear us
and that you are working to make this game better. The time for
spinning and rhetoric is over, the time for action is now.
Infektid, on 12 December 2018 - 12:56 PM, said: We all know how OP the Progettos are on Skirmishes, but at least
when they dump the clip they have horrendous DPM
This thing slaps 1200 damage on 6 seconds and then goes on IS3 mode.... balanced....
So after ruining randoms with your failed MM now you ruin skirmishes.
Bravo WG DA DA COMERADE SOVIET RASHA BALANS.
I guess this criticism won't go up the hierarchy..... after all only good and "constructive" feedback is passed upwards.... This will be dismissed as "whining".
Eaglax, on 12 December 2018 - 01:00 PM, said: it's not an entirely different analogy, because there are
comparable tank stats, and by comparing them you can assess how a
tank performs approximately, even without ever playing it, just
like I know how it would hurt approximately, when shooting myself.
And when comparing the stats of the IS-3a with comparable
counterparts, it just obvious, that it's not quite right. And to
me, the replays and twitch gameplays, which now show the actual
gameplay of the new IS-3a, prove that. Not to mention the opinions
of much better players than I am. I do know that it's a
standard procedure, to release premiums which are broken, so more
people buy it (although it hurts the game in the long run, but who
cares....) and so does everyone else... your way of apologizing for
it by saying: "your opinion is worthless and non constructive
because you never played it and have no experience" is just
ridiculous and actually quite an insult. and I will not
comment on your last sentence, just not worth it..
Link on message: #16440023
VarzA, on 12 December 2018 - 12:42 PM, said: Here's feedback, and you need to accept it as statement from
our point of view (backed by stats as well). 268 4 is still
overperforming, 252U is massively overperforming, 430U is
overperforming, LT-432 is a monster. Both of the 2 campaign
missions end with a t10 russian heavy tank. The common thread seems
to be russian tanks. There has never been a point in history where
the russian tech tree has been bad, it has almost always been
overall good or exceptional. I (as a player), do not want a
binary choice of playing russian tanks, or playing other tanks and
having a handicap. I am worried this is the trend this game has
been on for the past 2yrs, and from my point of view (and that of
many in this thread), the IS-3A just confirms it further. I
hope my post was constructive enough. I did not say
arrogance. I hope WG will allow ppl to use 7d free trial for the
IS-3A soon, i am not investing the kind of money one needs to
ensure i get it in lootboxes.eekeeboo: Your feedback is welcome. I will pass on the suggestion for
the rental, but it could be people are fortunate enough in the
boxes also. All I can say for now is that more announcements are to
follow.
Innapropriate_Username, on 12 December 2018 - 12:43 PM, said: I have it. I am playing it. It is beyond broken on
Defender level, maybe even more. How do tanks like Tiger2 in same
tier fight against this thing? Defender + IS3A on one side, and
Tiger2 and Panther on other side - something here is broken OP.eekeeboo: The same tactics I shared with you in the past?
_Davidge_, on 12 December 2018 - 12:43 PM, said: For those who thonk this will make IS 3A OP please remember again
it has 520 HP engine it is slugish. Regular IS 3 has 700 hp.
eekeeboo: This is one of the points I'll be making later
DaddysLittlePrincess, on 12 December 2018 - 12:43 PM, said: But they're not constructive anymore. Feedback in supertest
forum thread was constructive, but it was ignored. No post can be
constructive now as WG decided to put this broken mechanic in most
broken way on premium tank, which can't be nerfed
anymore. It would be OK to put the mechanic on tech
tree/reward tank, as they can be adjusted in the future. But this
decision was made simply to milk most money from loot boxes, as
many people already have Defender, e25 and lefh.eekeeboo: It's important to always be constructive, it helps
with the feedback and sharing information. In this instance, it's
important not to have a pre-judged knee-jerk reaction to the tank
like was seen with the ELC even or the badger.
chuao, on 12 December 2018 - 12:50 PM, said: I want IS-3A and IS-3A (B) black edition!!!eekeeboo: GENIUS
ChimPANGzee, on 12 December 2018 - 12:50 PM, said: I am so thoroughly and remarkably disappointed about the
"reimagining" of the IS-3A that I am compelled to go to the forums.
This is, without a doubt, the strongest heavy tank in the
game tier to tier. As many have mentioned it's "estimated dpm" is
grossly skewed, it is remarkably dishonest and does not inspire the
confidence from the community that you clearly need for this game
to keep going. Suggesting that this tank is anything but
extremely overpowered, or denying that this will essentially ruin
team play at tier VIII (Strongholds, Team Battles or Clan
Wars), is nothing short of blatant lying and a big slap to the
face. Many of us who play this game have supported the
company over many years, some spend more than 100 € every
year. It leaves a real bitter taste when you pull a stunt such as
this one, and it saddens me to see a game I like so much get ruined
by greed (for I can see no other reason behind this decision; if
there is one please share). I hope that you back track this
change promptly and go back to the drawing board (the idea is
interesting but this execution is disastrous), yet I have no
expectation what so ever that you will. Please prove me
wrong. Please show us that you can get the best out of your
creative and competent employees. Please show us that you hear us
and that you are working to make this game better. The time for
spinning and rhetoric is over, the time for action is now. eekeeboo: A tank being capable and strong does not mean it's
overpowered. There are plenty of weaknesses to the vehicle and
situations that the tank is not able to deal with. The
tank change as of now is going to remain, just to remain honest
with you.
Infektid, on 12 December 2018 - 12:56 PM, said: We all know how OP the Progettos are on Skirmishes, but at least
when they dump the clip they have horrendous DPMThis thing slaps 1200 damage on 6 seconds and then goes on IS3 mode.... balanced....
So after ruining randoms with your failed MM now you ruin skirmishes.
Bravo WG DA DA COMERADE SOVIET RASHA BALANS.
I guess this criticism won't go up the hierarchy..... after all only good and "constructive" feedback is passed upwards.... This will be dismissed as "whining".
eekeeboo: Whining as long as it's not rude, insulting and without bias
will of course be passed on. But I'm sure you're more than aware of
what happens when you just allow only whining in feedback?
Eaglax, on 12 December 2018 - 01:00 PM, said: it's not an entirely different analogy, because there are
comparable tank stats, and by comparing them you can assess how a
tank performs approximately, even without ever playing it, just
like I know how it would hurt approximately, when shooting myself.
And when comparing the stats of the IS-3a with comparable
counterparts, it just obvious, that it's not quite right. And to
me, the replays and twitch gameplays, which now show the actual
gameplay of the new IS-3a, prove that. Not to mention the opinions
of much better players than I am. I do know that it's a
standard procedure, to release premiums which are broken, so more
people buy it (although it hurts the game in the long run, but who
cares....) and so does everyone else... your way of apologizing for
it by saying: "your opinion is worthless and non constructive
because you never played it and have no experience" is just
ridiculous and actually quite an insult. and I will not
comment on your last sentence, just not worth it..eekeeboo: It is a completely and entirely different analogy. It's like
saying you know how to cut an onion, so you know how flying an
alien spaceship will feel.
Subject: ¡El IS-3A renace!
Link on message: #16439369
birimbao_1, on 12 December 2018 - 04:48 PM, said: No es confrontación.... tu has sacado el tema del
Crhysler... y el problema ahí no fue el carro... fue lo
que ocurrió y que no viene a cuento recordar entre WG... y un
creador de contenido.... eso fue lo que levantó el
revuelo... que la opinión de un jugador quisiese ser silenciada por
la compañía... no su opinión sobre el carro... el hype
que se montó fue por esas actitudes "poco edificantes".... no por
el carro... que por cierto ya que lo sacas a colación... es
otro carro OP y sin sentido... y que encima como tiene un
cañón que es muy muy bueno solo si tiras oro... era doblemente un
error .....
Link on message: #16439369
birimbao_1, on 12 December 2018 - 04:48 PM, said: No es confrontación.... tu has sacado el tema del
Crhysler... y el problema ahí no fue el carro... fue lo
que ocurrió y que no viene a cuento recordar entre WG... y un
creador de contenido.... eso fue lo que levantó el
revuelo... que la opinión de un jugador quisiese ser silenciada por
la compañía... no su opinión sobre el carro... el hype
que se montó fue por esas actitudes "poco edificantes".... no por
el carro... que por cierto ya que lo sacas a colación... es
otro carro OP y sin sentido... y que encima como tiene un
cañón que es muy muy bueno solo si tiras oro... era doblemente un
error .....Delhroh: No es así, pero no estoy aquí para debatir ese tema, dado
que sería Off-Topic. ¿Alguien tiene ya el IS-3A y ha
probado el vehículo con la nueva mecánica?
Subject: ¡El IS-3A renace!
Link on message: #16439292
Link on message: #16439292
Delhroh: Que manía de buscar la confrontación... En otro orden de
cosas, os recuerdo que podéis utilizar esta sección del foro para
vuestro feedback sobre la nueva actualización: PINCHA AQUÍ.
Subject: Pomocná ruka pro „Sváteční operaci“
Link on message: #16439281
RadecekH, on 12 December 2018 - 04:26 PM, said: Proč odsud zmizel noční příspěvek (nebyl můj) o tom, že nefunguje
diskuse ke článku "Prázdninové operace Hub"? Po kliknutí na
diskutovat na fóru to napíše: Sorry, we couldn't find that! You do
not have permission to view this topic. Je docela smutné, že
takovouto chybu není nikdo schopen napravit, ale mazat příspěvky,
to problém evidentně není.
Link on message: #16439281
RadecekH, on 12 December 2018 - 04:26 PM, said: Proč odsud zmizel noční příspěvek (nebyl můj) o tom, že nefunguje
diskuse ke článku "Prázdninové operace Hub"? Po kliknutí na
diskutovat na fóru to napíše: Sorry, we couldn't find that! You do
not have permission to view this topic. Je docela smutné, že
takovouto chybu není nikdo schopen napravit, ale mazat příspěvky,
to problém evidentně není.Kayi4ek: Ahoj, díky za upozornění, vše je
opraveno! 
Subject: Znovuzrozený IS-3A!
Link on message: #16439249
plesnivej_kompot, on 12 December 2018 - 04:22 PM, said: Nic proti kájo, ale podívej se na ty statistiky, musí ti přece být
jisté, že tank, který nabijí stejně dlouho jako IS-3 a má OP
autoreloader na 3 rány. Snad chápeš, že ten tank nemá žádné
znatelné nevýhody oproti IS-3 a výhod má spoustu. Není vpořádku, že
s tím můžeš zabít za 6s t8 scouta a pak se vklidu jít přestřelovat
s heavynama jako kdyby si měl normální IS-3 a vystřelil jen 1 ránu.
S tímto tankem je potřeba udělat něco hodně rychle... nejlépe do
pár dní- NE DO PŮL ROKU JAKO 268 4
Adam_Warlock_, on 12 December 2018 - 04:32 PM, said: Tak o cheatování kontributora si taky věděl a udělal si na
fóru takovou komedii, že jsem nevěděl jestli se mám smát nebo
brečet... Takže jestli víš či nevíš o nerfu co dostal škorp není
podstatné.. hlavní je že ho dostal
Link on message: #16439249
plesnivej_kompot, on 12 December 2018 - 04:22 PM, said: Nic proti kájo, ale podívej se na ty statistiky, musí ti přece být
jisté, že tank, který nabijí stejně dlouho jako IS-3 a má OP
autoreloader na 3 rány. Snad chápeš, že ten tank nemá žádné
znatelné nevýhody oproti IS-3 a výhod má spoustu. Není vpořádku, že
s tím můžeš zabít za 6s t8 scouta a pak se vklidu jít přestřelovat
s heavynama jako kdyby si měl normální IS-3 a vystřelil jen 1 ránu.
S tímto tankem je potřeba udělat něco hodně rychle... nejlépe do
pár dní- NE DO PŮL ROKU JAKO 268 4Kayi4ek: Jak jsem řekl. Znatelné nevýhody APCR v základu s nižší
pene, nižší pohyblivost a o něco horší pancíř. Výhody -
autoreloader.
Adam_Warlock_, on 12 December 2018 - 04:32 PM, said: Tak o cheatování kontributora si taky věděl a udělal si na
fóru takovou komedii, že jsem nevěděl jestli se mám smát nebo
brečet... Takže jestli víš či nevíš o nerfu co dostal škorp není
podstatné.. hlavní je že ho dostalKayi4ek: Nebudu ti vyvracet tvůj osobní názor. Pokud chceš sdílet
konstruktivní a slušnou zpětnou vazbu, využij k tomu příslušná
vlákna.
Subject: Apoya a Santa o al Krampus
Link on message: #16439228
ttkohete, on 12 December 2018 - 03:35 PM, said: apoyo a Bertin Osborne con mi seat 850 coupé. 
Link on message: #16439228
ttkohete, on 12 December 2018 - 03:35 PM, said: apoyo a Bertin Osborne con mi seat 850 coupé. 
Delhroh: Desafortunadamente la entrada no es válida 
Subject: ¡El IS-3A renace!
Link on message: #16439220
mcbean777, on 12 December 2018 - 04:26 PM, said: Te dejo un vídeo de uno de los más reconocidos streamers de
este juego, si no me equivoco es CC de WoT EU, es sólo un ejemplo,
TODOS los que eh visto opinan lo mismo. Está en inglés, pero es muy
básico y creo que se entiende. Si tú crees que esto es dejarlo al
mismo nivel de sus pares...entiendo que más que una opinión es una
consigna recibida. Saludos.
Link on message: #16439220
mcbean777, on 12 December 2018 - 04:26 PM, said: Te dejo un vídeo de uno de los más reconocidos streamers de
este juego, si no me equivoco es CC de WoT EU, es sólo un ejemplo,
TODOS los que eh visto opinan lo mismo. Está en inglés, pero es muy
básico y creo que se entiende. Si tú crees que esto es dejarlo al
mismo nivel de sus pares...entiendo que más que una opinión es una
consigna recibida. Saludos. Delhroh: Ya he visto el vídeo. Creo que la gente debería darse algo
de tiempo a la hora de dar su opinión de un carro y/o
vehículo. Como digo, ahora mismo hay mucho Hype como hubo con el
Chrysler. Un saludo 
Subject: Aktualizacja 1.3 - zgłoszenia błędów
Link on message: #16439190
Ulthion, on 12 December 2018 - 09:26 AM, said: Misja Blok-13 zmniejszono z 8 na 7, a brakowało mi 1 do skończenia.
Po zalogowaniu widać to. Czyli niby zrobione.. a misja nawet nie
rozpoczęta i rozpocząć jej nie mogłem. Po wybraniu innej misji,
zresetowało się to całkowicie.

Link on message: #16439190
Ulthion, on 12 December 2018 - 09:26 AM, said: Misja Blok-13 zmniejszono z 8 na 7, a brakowało mi 1 do skończenia.
Po zalogowaniu widać to. Czyli niby zrobione.. a misja nawet nie
rozpoczęta i rozpocząć jej nie mogłem. Po wybraniu innej misji,
zresetowało się to całkowicie.
Falathi: Aktualizacja:
wiemy o tym problemie, rozwiązaniem jest rozegranie jednej bitwy pojazdem, który służy do wykonania tej misji
Dzięki za zgłoszenie!
wiemy o tym problemie, rozwiązaniem jest rozegranie jednej bitwy pojazdem, który służy do wykonania tej misji
Dzięki za zgłoszenie!
Subject: Znovuzrozený IS-3A!
Link on message: #16439171
Adam_Warlock_, on 12 December 2018 - 04:18 PM, said: Jinými slovy když se mu povede dobře tak ho tajně nerfeneme
jako Škorpikovi dělo... nic není pro tuhle firmu problém......
Link on message: #16439171
Adam_Warlock_, on 12 December 2018 - 04:18 PM, said: Jinými slovy když se mu povede dobře tak ho tajně nerfeneme
jako Škorpikovi dělo... nic není pro tuhle firmu problém......Kayi4ek: Tajně nerfneme Škorpíkovi dělo? O tom bych musel něco vědět

Subject: Podwójne PD przed świętami
Link on message: #16439159
Weles_z_Nawii, on 12 December 2018 - 09:35 AM, said: To w końcu za każdą czy za wygraną + 10top?
Link on message: #16439159
Weles_z_Nawii, on 12 December 2018 - 09:35 AM, said: To w końcu za każdą czy za wygraną + 10top?Falathi: Wygrana + 10top.
Subject: ¡El IS-3A renace!
Link on message: #16439154
kebote, on 12 December 2018 - 04:16 PM, said: Menos los torneos 1 vs 1 tier 8 de WG 
Link on message: #16439154
kebote, on 12 December 2018 - 04:16 PM, said: Menos los torneos 1 vs 1 tier 8 de WG Delhroh: Supongo que algunos vehículos tendrán mejores opciones que
otros, en eso te doy la razón.
... aunque también es cuestión de
habilidad, como ya sabemos.
Subject: ¡El IS-3A renace!
Link on message: #16439123
birimbao_1, on 12 December 2018 - 04:03 PM, said: Pues coinciden de un modo hasta inquietante con la linea de
estilo de los CC de otras comunidades que he leído....
exactamente la misma linea argumental....
deberiais juntaros unos cuantos de WG y meteros en una CW o en una
SH de tier 8.... y despues nos explicais a los demás... a los
cientos de miles que si lo han hecho-hacen... que este juego no
es un pay to win....
Link on message: #16439123
birimbao_1, on 12 December 2018 - 04:03 PM, said: Pues coinciden de un modo hasta inquietante con la linea de
estilo de los CC de otras comunidades que he leído....
exactamente la misma linea argumental....
deberiais juntaros unos cuantos de WG y meteros en una CW o en una
SH de tier 8.... y despues nos explicais a los demás... a los
cientos de miles que si lo han hecho-hacen... que este juego no
es un pay to win....Delhroh: Sigue sin ser un Pay to Win, de hecho World of Tanks nunca
lo ha sido. Puedes enarbolar repetidamente la bandera de "Pay to
Win", pero el hecho es que ningún tanque premium puede ganar en
solitario una partida... debe colaborar con su equipo, sino ese
tanque será destruido por 3-4 adversarios que centren su fuego
sobre él. Y lo más importante... para seguir llegando a tier X
tienes que jugar al juego... no hay ningún vehículo de ese tier a
la venta, ni lo habrá. Otro asunto son los tanques de recompensa de
tier X, como ya sabemos. Un saludo.
Subject: Ponowne narodziny IS-3A!
Link on message: #16439120
Daimler1916, on 12 December 2018 - 04:08 PM, said: Jak spełniasz życzenia to ja poproszę o powrót WT E100 dla graczy
którzy posiadali wcześniej ten czołg. Skoro wysłuchujecie płacz
pomidorków zza Buga to proszę o wysłuchanie naszych
propozycji. Wtedy będzie sprawiedliwie Komandarm .
Link on message: #16439120
Daimler1916, on 12 December 2018 - 04:08 PM, said: Jak spełniasz życzenia to ja poproszę o powrót WT E100 dla graczy
którzy posiadali wcześniej ten czołg. Skoro wysłuchujecie płacz
pomidorków zza Buga to proszę o wysłuchanie naszych
propozycji. Wtedy będzie sprawiedliwie Komandarm .Falathi: To życzenie pozostaje poza moim zakresem możliwości.
Subject: Ponowne narodziny IS-3A!
Link on message: #16439093
Link on message: #16439093
Falathi: Prawdę mówiąc, rozumiem obawy bo czołg dostał konkretnego kopa do
możliwości bojowych, który zmienił go z przeciętnego także pod
względem rozgrywki ciężarka w potencjalnie morderczą
maszynę.
Mimo to: zobaczymy, czy faktycznie jest aż tak OP w praktyce. Ja wiem, że doładowanie to stroga rzecz ale ten czołg ma też swoje wady.
PS Na specjalne życzenie: tak, tier X będzie w stanie go załatwić
Mimo to: zobaczymy, czy faktycznie jest aż tak OP w praktyce. Ja wiem, że doładowanie to stroga rzecz ale ten czołg ma też swoje wady.
PS Na specjalne życzenie: tak, tier X będzie w stanie go załatwić
Subject: ¡El IS-3A renace!
Link on message: #16439083
birimbao_1, on 12 December 2018 - 03:50 PM, said: Así me gusta... el feedback no importa... somos nosotros que
nos inventamos cosas... Insisto... no jugamos al mismo
juego querido delhroh... y no hablo de ti... hablo de
WG en general...
Link on message: #16439083
birimbao_1, on 12 December 2018 - 03:50 PM, said: Así me gusta... el feedback no importa... somos nosotros que
nos inventamos cosas... Insisto... no jugamos al mismo
juego querido delhroh... y no hablo de ti... hablo de
WG en general... Delhroh: La parte de las impresiones sobre el IS-3A son mías y no de
Wargaming. Un saludo.
Subject: Idea for a super tier IX Chinese medium (Gameplay)
Link on message: #16439056
Link on message: #16439056
Nohe21: I am closing this thread since it was written in a different
language. If you want to share some information
from websites in different languages, please do so by
translating it first. Have a nice day 
Subject: Calendrier hivernal : Jour 12
Link on message: #16439022
CelticJulo, on 12 December 2018 - 02:03 PM, said: Je téléphone à Actinid, qui demandera par mail au PDG de
Wargaming. Du coup je te répond plus tard.
Link on message: #16439022
CelticJulo, on 12 December 2018 - 02:03 PM, said: Je téléphone à Actinid, qui demandera par mail au PDG de
Wargaming. Du coup je te répond plus tard.Actinid:
-Oui Allo ? Non je n'ai pas le
planning des ventes donc aucune idée pour le E-25. En revanche je
sais qu'il sera présent dans les boites de noël pour ceux qui
veulent tenter leur chance (plus d'info ici). Bon faut que je te laisse
j'ai le topic sur l'IS3-A qui brule et j'ai des retours à faire à
ce sujet !!
-Oui Allo ? Non je n'ai pas le
planning des ventes donc aucune idée pour le E-25. En revanche je
sais qu'il sera présent dans les boites de noël pour ceux qui
veulent tenter leur chance (plus d'info ici). Bon faut que je te laisse
j'ai le topic sur l'IS3-A qui brule et j'ai des retours à faire à
ce sujet !!
Subject: ¡El IS-3A renace!
Link on message: #16439021
Link on message: #16439021
Delhroh: Saludos, Muchas gracias por compartir vuestras opiniones
sobre el IS-3A. La idea de los desarrolladores a la hora de
proporcionarle ese modo de recarga era balancear el vehículo para
ponerlo a la altura de los vehículos actuales. Hay que decir que
anteriormente el IS-3A era bastante malo y esta es la solución que
se ha puesto encima de la mesa. Aunque pueda parecer OP tampoco lo
es tanto. Yo he jugado varias partidas con él, y sí, no es mal
vehículo, pero nada por encima de otros autocargadores, salvo con
la salvedad de cargar en poco tiempo su primera bala, claro.
Recordemos que el IS-3A no tiene la misma maniobrabilidad que el
IS-3 normal, además de llevar la torreta de stock del vehículo
estándar. Muchos jugadores también pusieron el grito en elcielo con
otros vehículos y luego el tiempo demostró que tampoco era para
tanto (caso del Chrysler como siempre). Mi consejo es
que le déis un tiempo al vehículo y que la gente que lo pruebe de
sus impresiones sobre el mismo, pero por supuesto, aquellos que
tenéis la última palabra sobre vuestras impresiones sois vosotros
mismos. ¡Suerte en el campo de batalla! 
Subject: Znovuzrozený IS-3A!
Link on message: #16438878
sTeblo, on 12 December 2018 - 02:46 PM, said: Jen jedna takova bokem - jestli jsi ho prodal, nejde nahodou
obnovit (mel by jit, pokud se nemylim, v in-game shopu neni)? A
pokud jsi ho vymenil, jak by jsi to chtel udelat ted? Vymenit zase
zpatky? S doplatkem, bez doplatku?
kocour75, on 12 December 2018 - 03:01 PM, said: Ono to DPM v článku je spočítáno tak že se plně nabije
zásobník a pak plně vybije a znova. Šlo by, ale spočítat i s plně
nabitým zásobníkem a poté s dobíjením po jednom náboji což by byla
nejvíce OP varianta. Střední varianta by byla spočítat střelbu po
jednom náboji. Neškodilo by doplnit článek o všechny varianty.
Rovněž v článku chybí zmínka o druzích munice v základu je APCR
které létají podstatně rychleji než AP u IS-3 a jako goldy jsou
HEAT .
Link on message: #16438878
sTeblo, on 12 December 2018 - 02:46 PM, said: Jen jedna takova bokem - jestli jsi ho prodal, nejde nahodou
obnovit (mel by jit, pokud se nemylim, v in-game shopu neni)? A
pokud jsi ho vymenil, jak by jsi to chtel udelat ted? Vymenit zase
zpatky? S doplatkem, bez doplatku? Kayi4ek: https://eu.wargaming.../article/10234/
14:27 Added after 4 minutes
kocour75, on 12 December 2018 - 03:01 PM, said: Ono to DPM v článku je spočítáno tak že se plně nabije
zásobník a pak plně vybije a znova. Šlo by, ale spočítat i s plně
nabitým zásobníkem a poté s dobíjením po jednom náboji což by byla
nejvíce OP varianta. Střední varianta by byla spočítat střelbu po
jednom náboji. Neškodilo by doplnit článek o všechny varianty.
Rovněž v článku chybí zmínka o druzích munice v základu je APCR
které létají podstatně rychleji než AP u IS-3 a jako goldy jsou
HEAT .Kayi4ek: APCR pro heavy jako základ jsou spíše nevýhoda + nižší
penetrace než IS-3. Já jsem dnes chtěl tank pořádně vyzkoušet, ale
bohužel mě nepodržel internet a 3/5 jsem dropnul, takže nemůžu
říct. Každopádně bych počkal s přehnanými závěry, uvidíme, jak se
tanku nakonec povede (vzpomeňte si třeba na Badgera).
Subject: Santa vs Krampus: The Battle for the North Pole
Link on message: #16438422
Xandania, on 11 December 2018 - 07:44 PM, said: Dear Secret_Santa, This Christmas we do not need any
special presents, just a decisive defeat for the Krampusvagn so it
will take it's place as SantaMauses helper once again.
Link on message: #16438422
Xandania, on 11 December 2018 - 07:44 PM, said: Dear Secret_Santa, This Christmas we do not need any
special presents, just a decisive defeat for the Krampusvagn so it
will take it's place as SantaMauses helper once again.
eekeeboo: Noooo
Subject: Double XP Before Your Holidays
Link on message: #16438372
Cro006, on 12 December 2018 - 10:54 AM, said: Maybe make like 2 double xp specials - one is very special -
it gives you double xp on ever battle - second is this one - double
xp for top 10 of winning team and top 5 of losing team - that way
when it's obvious you're going to lose you still try your best to
be top 5
I hope blind people of WG will somehow read this
and try to think about it. Good luck and have fun
cro001, on 12 December 2018 - 11:38 AM, said: People already do that. 
Link on message: #16438372
Cro006, on 12 December 2018 - 10:54 AM, said: Maybe make like 2 double xp specials - one is very special -
it gives you double xp on ever battle - second is this one - double
xp for top 10 of winning team and top 5 of losing team - that way
when it's obvious you're going to lose you still try your best to
be top 5 eekeeboo: Calling me blind is not the way to go friend.
cro001, on 12 December 2018 - 11:38 AM, said: People already do that. eekeeboo: Now imagine rewarding it even more
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16438353
VarzA, on 12 December 2018 - 12:35 PM, said: You actually said that you need to own the tank to pass
judgement on it. It would be fine if it was a tech tree tank (i'd
probably grind it and buy it), but this is a 40 euro premium. I
need to spend 40 euros in order to form an opinion ? Sorry, but
that doesn't seem right to me. We (the players) were right
about the 268 4, about the 430 U, 252U, the lt-432 (we will be
right about that too). At which point do we earn the right to form
an opinion ?
Link on message: #16438353
VarzA, on 12 December 2018 - 12:35 PM, said: You actually said that you need to own the tank to pass
judgement on it. It would be fine if it was a tech tree tank (i'd
probably grind it and buy it), but this is a 40 euro premium. I
need to spend 40 euros in order to form an opinion ? Sorry, but
that doesn't seem right to me. We (the players) were right
about the 268 4, about the 430 U, 252U, the lt-432 (we will be
right about that too). At which point do we earn the right to form
an opinion ?eekeeboo: Please take the time to read and not paraphrase what I said:
" But it's important people reserve judgment until perhaps
they get their hands on it? " - Asking people to not judge
something they are not informed on is now arrogance, interesting
approach. OP vehicles are not good, tech tree or not,
but judging something before you even play it? You can form your
opinion, stating that opinion as fact because you want it to be? Do
you really believe this to be acceptable and normal?
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16438331
WaryShadow, on 12 December 2018 - 11:20 AM, said: 1: ive watched this thing been played on dez's channel you
can burst then just go back to normal heavy mode 2: giving a
fairly armoured heavy this inverse reloading system is yet more of
what the community as a whole doesn't want 3:the only
balancing factor is itll face tier X's because against tier 8's and
7's this is going to be worse than the defender not to mention if
it see's tier 6's 4: and as for reserve judgement... when we
encounter this thing on the battlefield theres going to be plenty
of posts on the forums 5: as for toxic Behaviour people are
very passionate we as a community dont want more OP premiums as
when were grinding through tech tree lines we just get dumped on
especially when were lower tier it doesnt matter if this tank is
actually op or not it certainly seems that way to my self and
others on this forum so of course were going to pass judgement. And
the fact that this is in the casino i mean loot i mean holiday
boxes leads the cynical of us to think WG have super buffed
this Vehicle ot sell more boxes so people spend 100's of
pounds,euros,dollars attempting to obtain something which the
community believes op more likely than not as a way of keeping up
with the power creep
Link on message: #16438331
WaryShadow, on 12 December 2018 - 11:20 AM, said: 1: ive watched this thing been played on dez's channel you
can burst then just go back to normal heavy mode 2: giving a
fairly armoured heavy this inverse reloading system is yet more of
what the community as a whole doesn't want 3:the only
balancing factor is itll face tier X's because against tier 8's and
7's this is going to be worse than the defender not to mention if
it see's tier 6's 4: and as for reserve judgement... when we
encounter this thing on the battlefield theres going to be plenty
of posts on the forums 5: as for toxic Behaviour people are
very passionate we as a community dont want more OP premiums as
when were grinding through tech tree lines we just get dumped on
especially when were lower tier it doesnt matter if this tank is
actually op or not it certainly seems that way to my self and
others on this forum so of course were going to pass judgement. And
the fact that this is in the casino i mean loot i mean holiday
boxes leads the cynical of us to think WG have super buffed
this Vehicle ot sell more boxes so people spend 100's of
pounds,euros,dollars attempting to obtain something which the
community believes op more likely than not as a way of keeping up
with the power creep eekeeboo: Those posts and feedback are most welcome, as long as
they're constructive. But giving informed feedback is more
beneficial and important than someone giving uninformed and
superficial feedback based on "what they heard".
Passion does not entitle a person to be abusive, insulting or
offensive to anyone. Not to myself, wg staff or one another.
There is no instance a person has the right to be
offensive to another.
Subject: The IS-3A Reborn!
Link on message: #16438299
DaddysLittlePrincess, on 12 December 2018 - 10:54 AM, said: I have enough experience in this game to understand what is
game breaking, yes. IS-3 was considered OP for many years, now you
give the tank that can deal 1200 dmg in 6s and then act as regular
IS-3 (someone already counted that it's >3k dpm)... yeah,
nothing wrong with that. How is that balanced with some other tier
8 premiums? Now please convince me that, for example, my Mutz
(without any armor, terrible gun handling and 1800dpm) is as
valuable on battlefield as this abomination.
Satanchia, on 12 December 2018 - 10:55 AM, said: ly balanced tank hahahaha
VarzA, on 12 December 2018 - 10:56 AM, said: Might want to reword the last bit. See, some ppl have a
problem with the idea that they need to pay WG 40 euros to have the
'right' to say something about this topic.
VarzA, on 12 December 2018 - 10:59 AM, said: I don't have defender, i don't have 268 4, doesn't stop me
(and all of the servers combined) to judge them as OP. On a
sidenote, your posts have started to inflame some of the posters
here, i assume the goal is to not pour gasoline on the fire. I'm
probably not the only one sensing the arrogance.
Eaglax, on 12 December 2018 - 11:04 AM, said:
I know that shooting myself in the
foot would hurt, yet I have never done it. Does that mean that I'm
wrong about it? Do I have to shoot myself before I can talk about
it? hm? what a joke...
Link on message: #16438299
DaddysLittlePrincess, on 12 December 2018 - 10:54 AM, said: I have enough experience in this game to understand what is
game breaking, yes. IS-3 was considered OP for many years, now you
give the tank that can deal 1200 dmg in 6s and then act as regular
IS-3 (someone already counted that it's >3k dpm)... yeah,
nothing wrong with that. How is that balanced with some other tier
8 premiums? Now please convince me that, for example, my Mutz
(without any armor, terrible gun handling and 1800dpm) is as
valuable on battlefield as this abomination.eekeeboo: I/We are not talking about the IS3 or any other thank. You
are calling the IS3A OP before even having tried it. It is
important to know what it is and how it behaves first.
Satanchia, on 12 December 2018 - 10:55 AM, said: ly balanced tank hahahaha eekeeboo: Do you notice where the footage is from?
VarzA, on 12 December 2018 - 10:56 AM, said: Might want to reword the last bit. See, some ppl have a
problem with the idea that they need to pay WG 40 euros to have the
'right' to say something about this topic.eekeeboo: Reserving judgment means to wait until you have all the
facts and information before you claim to have formed an opinion
and share it (pre-judging).
VarzA, on 12 December 2018 - 10:59 AM, said: I don't have defender, i don't have 268 4, doesn't stop me
(and all of the servers combined) to judge them as OP. On a
sidenote, your posts have started to inflame some of the posters
here, i assume the goal is to not pour gasoline on the fire. I'm
probably not the only one sensing the arrogance.eekeeboo: No, my goal is to try to highlight that people should do more than
follow the judgment of something that it's OP before they've even
seen it. But feel free to keep calling me arrogant for asking
people to wait for more information on something before posting
about how the tank is broke, OP and imbalanced. I hope you see the
irony in your statement.
Eaglax, on 12 December 2018 - 11:04 AM, said: eekeeboo: You know it hurts from people have done it and have
had people show and share that information and knowledge through
time. That is a different analogy from people having already seen
how being shot impacts a person and the effect it has. Have you
played the Is-3a and have you hit yourself in the foot with
it?
Subject: Znovuzrozený IS-3A!
Link on message: #16438272
Delta_Sniper_SVK, on 12 December 2018 - 01:13 PM, said: Takže ak to dobre chápem, tak to má 1170 burst dmg a potom to má
dpm IS3ky.. Oh wait, dokonca lepšie DPM ako IS3ka. Alebo sa mýlim ?
Povedzte že hej. Teraz budú SH čisto o progetto+IS3A a nejaký
invisible light.
Link on message: #16438272
Delta_Sniper_SVK, on 12 December 2018 - 01:13 PM, said: Takže ak to dobre chápem, tak to má 1170 burst dmg a potom to má
dpm IS3ky.. Oh wait, dokonca lepšie DPM ako IS3ka. Alebo sa mýlim ?
Povedzte že hej. Teraz budú SH čisto o progetto+IS3A a nejaký
invisible light.Kayi4ek: DPM máš zmíněné přímo v článku 
Subject: Discussion for "In-game Tips/Mini-Guides Contest - Maps"
Link on message: #16438232
JaffaStar, on 11 December 2018 - 02:19 AM, said: After 50.000 battles it is pretty hard to try to find the best way
to explain to a new player map tactics ... because the new player
are in a tier I or II tank ... and those little tanks have
small view range and small speed , most of them ... I
think that something like that would be extremly usefull for the
new ones :
like , to show them where they can sit ,
how far they can see , and spot the enemy , the route that they
sould take to reach one position or another ... and then explained
the value of camo of every bushes , and how to shoot or not from
behind those bushes ... where not to go , and why ... this is what
pop up in my mind right now ....
JaffaStar, on 11 December 2018 - 06:04 PM, said: Map - Malinkova Tank : Tier I Ms-1 . The green circle
represent the view range with crew at 50 % The blue circle
represent the view range with the crew at 100 % The white cirle
represent the view range with crew at 100 % + Binocular telescope
... This helps new players understand , how far cban they see in
their small tanks , in various situation ... and with the
posibility of moving that circles around they can figure it out ,
with a little help , where are the best positions for them to be on
the map .
And why they can see the enemy tanks
or why they can not see them ... This case is when they spot for
themselfs ... This are 3 positions on the malinkova map ,
that new players should use , because on every position are some
bushes that will provide them cover and , the better the crew are
more equipment they have , the far they will be able to see and
spot the enemy tanks ...
Link on message: #16438232
JaffaStar, on 11 December 2018 - 02:19 AM, said: After 50.000 battles it is pretty hard to try to find the best way
to explain to a new player map tactics ... because the new player
are in a tier I or II tank ... and those little tanks have
small view range and small speed , most of them ... I
think that something like that would be extremly usefull for the
new ones :vuque:
JaffaStar, on 11 December 2018 - 06:04 PM, said: Map - Malinkova Tank : Tier I Ms-1 . The green circle
represent the view range with crew at 50 % The blue circle
represent the view range with the crew at 100 % The white cirle
represent the view range with crew at 100 % + Binocular telescope
... This helps new players understand , how far cban they see in
their small tanks , in various situation ... and with the
posibility of moving that circles around they can figure it out ,
with a little help , where are the best positions for them to be on
the map . vuque: Hello, this is the discussion topic, you need to submit
your tips and guides in the submission thread! 
Subject: Pomocná ruka pro „Sváteční operaci“
Link on message: #16438203
global_asa_wenca, on 12 December 2018 - 01:03 PM, said: To nebyl "vtip" ale jízlivost, protože mě některý změny co s hrou
děláte vážně krknou. A na to QB video se koukni, IMO se v něm najde
i nějakej zajímavej materiál pro zpětnou vazbu.
Link on message: #16438203
global_asa_wenca, on 12 December 2018 - 01:03 PM, said: To nebyl "vtip" ale jízlivost, protože mě některý změny co s hrou
děláte vážně krknou. A na to QB video se koukni, IMO se v něm najde
i nějakej zajímavej materiál pro zpětnou vazbu.Kayi4ek: Video jsem viděl. To, že jsi krknutý, mě mrzí. Pokud
chceš sdílet konstruktivní zpětnou vazbu o tom, co tě krká, neváhej
tak učinit v příslušných vláknech.
Subject: Pomocná ruka pro „Sváteční operaci“
Link on message: #16438139
global_asa_wenca, on 12 December 2018 - 12:47 PM, said: Ano samozřejmě. Autoloader bez vyvážení nějakou nevýhodou není nic
jinýho než zvrácenej. Kdyby vám šlo i o hru a nejen o to jak v co
nejkratším čase vyždímat z hráčů co nejvíc prachů, tak byste
takovýhle věci do hry spíš nepřidávali. Mimochodem už jsi viděl
video od QB k tomu tématu ždímání? Jak se ti líbilo, QB určitě
kecá, že jo?
Link on message: #16438139
global_asa_wenca, on 12 December 2018 - 12:47 PM, said: Ano samozřejmě. Autoloader bez vyvážení nějakou nevýhodou není nic
jinýho než zvrácenej. Kdyby vám šlo i o hru a nejen o to jak v co
nejkratším čase vyždímat z hráčů co nejvíc prachů, tak byste
takovýhle věci do hry spíš nepřidávali. Mimochodem už jsi viděl
video od QB k tomu tématu ždímání? Jak se ti líbilo, QB určitě
kecá, že jo?Kayi4ek: Bohužel jsem nepochopil "vtip" v tvém prvním příspěvku a
snažil jsem se pomoct ...
Subject: Připravte se na svátky s novými misemi
Link on message: #16438096
MeriorOne, on 12 December 2018 - 09:54 AM, said: po aktualizaci: 
Link on message: #16438096
MeriorOne, on 12 December 2018 - 09:54 AM, said: po aktualizaci: 
Kayi4ek: Děkuij moc za nahlášení, doufám, že bude chyba co nejdříve
opravena! 
Реклама | Adv















