The IS-3A Reborn!
Дата: 12.12.2018 20:33:54
Infektid, on 12 December 2018 - 01:10 PM, said: Guys dont bash to much on eekeeboo after all this was said by
a dev about the Object 268 v4 after the release...
Q: How is the Obj. 268 V4 doing?A: There are a lot of voices, both good and bad, but that means that the tank is balanced. A nerf is improbable, but a buff very possible
https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2018/03/03/wot-qa-stream-02-03-2018/#more-63230
This is how out of touch they are from their own game....
eekeeboo: I'm like a maus with spall liner to
arty! 
I understand the frustration
and opinions, I really do. But it's always important to be
objective and not have reactions like that for the Chrysler.
I understand the frustration
and opinions, I really do. But it's always important to be
objective and not have reactions like that for the Chrysler.
Lethul, on 12 December 2018 - 01:26 PM, said: Maybe we can read and have basing understanding about ingame
mechanics? I does not take experience of a tank to realize it is
broken. I knew for a fact that obj 268v4 was broken on release yet
I had never played it. It's to bad that WG employees don't
seem to have any grasp about their own game tbh. 13:27 Added after
1 minute What are you talking about? Should we just sit and
happily look them implement broken stuff and not complain until it
is released and irreversable. What point does that serve?eekeeboo: What are you talking about? Should we just sit and happily
look them implement broken stuff and not complain until it is
released and irreversable. What point does that serve? Many
people with understanding have claimed broken tanks of doom or
broken tanks of never getting played in the past. Once they got to
the server, this was not the case (Chrysler, badger, ELC Even), yes
there are instances where it was also the case. But that's why it's
important to wait and see what the actual performance turns out to
be. And no, it was stated that it's simply better to
have an informed opinion and a prejudged statement.
cro001, on 12 December 2018 - 01:30 PM, said: Why? Because he keeps saying that our opinions are not worth
a damn because we don't own it? I myself I'm not gambling on loot
boxes just to prove my point.eekeeboo: Please read the whole text, not just read the first few
words and ignore the rest. It also pays to read everything I state
and not just the parts you want to. At no stage did I say you
should gamble and at no point did I say your opinion is worthless.
Please take the time to actually read what is being typed.
Thank-you.
Infektid, on 12 December 2018 - 01:31 PM, said: Guys haven't you realized that any criticism and poiting out the
obvious fact that this tank will be beyond broken in certain game
modes is seing as "destructive" and just brushed aside.....
Use this thread to vent your frustations because NOTHING will be done.
But don't worry you will have new shiny cammos for your tanks for the amazing price of 49.99.... 13:33 Added after 2 minutes Because he is a nobody on WG's chain of command (no disrespect for the person)... he will get the flak but in the end nothing will be changed because the criticism stops on his level.
eekeeboo: Because he is a nobody on WG's chain of command (no
disrespect for the person)... he will get the flak but in the end
nothing will be changed because the criticism stops on his level.
That's not entirely true the feedback is always being passed
upwards, but yes, I do not get to make the decisions on balancing
and other things. I'll comment now, it's been a busy
day and I'm now replying out of work. I've already watched the
video, I also watched the stream. I will say that as you can see
it's a capable tank, but at the end of the day.... skill is a
player who is capable of getting the best out of most tanks and
understands the game very well. He knows the mechanics very well
and knows when to engage and when not to etc. I'm sure you've seen
yourself his abilities in most premiums. I will also ask you to
watch more reviews, in particular, those highlighting the
differences between vehicles. Such instances will show poor engine
power, stock IS3 turret, poor view range, terrible accuracy and
doesn't aim well on the move either. This means in the long-range
engagements this tank is very easily bullied and penetrated by many
tanks. I don't need anyone to come to my rescue, but
thank-you for the suggestion.
The IS-3A Reborn!