Developers posts on forum

Subject: Important Information\Updates & Patch Notes\beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184749

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184749

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184749

Subject: Important Information\Updates & Patch Notes\beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184680

DoctorJones, on 20 October 2010 - 04:44 PM, said: I would rather they give us far out anticipated release dates rather than trying to hit the nail on the head. Such as saying that a patch will release in 2 weeks when it would actually arrive in around 1 week. I would much rather be able to say, "Wow, they always get their patches dones early!" as opposed to the repeated disappointments that we have had recently.

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184680

DoctorJones, on Oct 20 2010 - 15:44, said: I would rather they give us far out anticipated release dates rather than trying to hit the nail on the head.   Such as saying that a patch will release in 2 weeks when it would actually arrive in around 1 week. I would much rather be able to say, "Wow, they always get their patches dones early!" as opposed to the repeated disappointments that we have had recently.

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184680

DoctorJones, on Oct 20 2010 - 15:44, said: I would rather they give us far out anticipated release dates rather than trying to hit the nail on the head.   Such as saying that a patch will release in 2 weeks when it would actually arrive in around 1 week. I would much rather be able to say, "Wow, they always get their patches dones early!" as opposed to the repeated disappointments that we have had recently.

Subject: Important Information\Updates & Patch Notes\beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184669

Makikou, on 20 October 2010 - 04:16 PM, said: Seriously Armor9, if you dont want to get forum banned i'd really give up already.. just deal with it.

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184669

Makikou, on Oct 20 2010 - 15:16, said: Seriously Armor9, if you dont want to get forum banned i'd really give up already.. just deal with it.

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184669

Makikou, on Oct 20 2010 - 15:16, said: Seriously Armor9, if you dont want to get forum banned i'd really give up already.. just deal with it.

Subject: Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Let's discuss good sportsmanship
Link on message: #184659

Subject: Off-Topic Discussion\Off-Topic\Battlefield Justice and Cowboy diplomacy
Link on message: #184646

Subject: Archives\Beta\This is a war game not a spectator sport
Link on message: #184640

Subject: Archives\Beta\Remember, we were all noobs once
Link on message: #184634

Subject: Archives\Beta\Mother told us there'd be days like these
Link on message: #184629

Subject: Archives\Beta\To all of you glory hounds
Link on message: #184625

Subject: News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\Here Come Stars and Stripes
Link on message: #184590

Morrigan, on 20 October 2010 - 03:32 PM, said: Mad_Minute, on 19 October 2010 - 07:29 AM, said:I'm really curious how the medium tank M3 will be handled and whether we'll use the sponson mounted gun or just the turret as is currently seen with the Char.
Devs stated that the Lee/Grant will initially only have a functioning top turret gun, not the sponson gun.


Mad_Minute, on 19 October 2010 - 07:29 AM, said: I'm really curious how the medium tank M3 will be handled and whether we'll use the sponson mounted gun or just the turret as is currently seen with the Char.

Subject: Here Come Stars and Stripes
Link on message: #184590

Morrigan, on Oct 20 2010 - 14:32, said: Mad_Minute, on Oct 19 2010 - 06:29, said: I'm really curious how the medium tank M3 will be handled and whether we'll use the sponson mounted gun or just the turret as is currently seen with the Char.
Devs stated that the Lee/Grant will initially only have a functioning top turret gun, not the sponson gun.



Mad_Minute, on Oct 19 2010 - 06:29, said: I'm really curious how the medium tank M3 will be handled and whether we'll use the sponson mounted gun or just the turret as is currently seen with the Char.

Subject: Here Come Stars and Stripes
Link on message: #184590

Morrigan, on Oct 20 2010 - 14:32, said: Mad_Minute, on Oct 19 2010 - 06:29, said: I'm really curious how the medium tank M3 will be handled and whether we'll use the sponson mounted gun or just the turret as is currently seen with the Char.
Devs stated that the Lee/Grant will initially only have a functioning top turret gun, not the sponson gun.



Mad_Minute, on Oct 19 2010 - 06:29, said: I'm really curious how the medium tank M3 will be handled and whether we'll use the sponson mounted gun or just the turret as is currently seen with the Char.

Subject: Important Information\Updates & Patch Notes\beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184569

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184569

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184569

Subject: Important Information\Updates & Patch Notes\beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184550

Orkel2, on 20 October 2010 - 03:15 PM, said: MrVic, on 20 October 2010 - 02:53 PM, said: Orkel2, on 20 October 2010 - 02:44 PM, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline
Don't worry it's a very short test. I just hope it remains stable. If it works well it means were in the sooner rather then later position for .6
Yeah, but I would have loved to test the warp fix/US tanks even if it was for a day or two
Guess I'm in for a long wait then.


MrVic, on 20 October 2010 - 02:53 PM, said: Orkel2, on 20 October 2010 - 02:44 PM, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline
Don't worry it's a very short test. I just hope it remains stable. If it works well it means were in the sooner rather then later position for .6


Orkel2, on 20 October 2010 - 02:44 PM, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184550

Orkel2, on Oct 20 2010 - 14:15, said: MrVic, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:53, said: Orkel2, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:44, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline  
Don't worry it's a very short test.  I just hope it remains stable. If it works well it means were in the sooner rather then later position for .6

Yeah, but I would have loved to test the warp fix/US tanks even if it was for a day or two

Guess I'm in for a long wait then.



MrVic, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:53, said: Orkel2, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:44, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline  
Don't worry it's a very short test.  I just hope it remains stable. If it works well it means were in the sooner rather then later position for .6



Orkel2, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:44, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline  

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184550

Orkel2, on Oct 20 2010 - 14:15, said: MrVic, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:53, said: Orkel2, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:44, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline  
Don't worry it's a very short test.  I just hope it remains stable. If it works well it means were in the sooner rather then later position for .6

Yeah, but I would have loved to test the warp fix/US tanks even if it was for a day or two

Guess I'm in for a long wait then.



MrVic, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:53, said: Orkel2, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:44, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline  
Don't worry it's a very short test.  I just hope it remains stable. If it works well it means were in the sooner rather then later position for .6



Orkel2, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:44, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline  

Subject: Important Information\Updates & Patch Notes\beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184462

Orkel2, on 20 October 2010 - 02:44 PM, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184462

Orkel2, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:44, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline  

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184462

Orkel2, on Oct 20 2010 - 13:44, said: I can't access the Russian 0.6x testing because my Russian beta account was made just a few hours after the october 19th deadline  

Subject: Important Information\Updates & Patch Notes\beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184456

VGA, on 20 October 2010 - 12:44 PM, said: Kelron, on 20 October 2010 - 12:23 PM, said: I demand a refund!
Ok, here it is
*pushes some air toward Keltron*


Kelron, on 20 October 2010 - 12:23 PM, said: I demand a refund!

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184456

VGA, on Oct 20 2010 - 11:44, said: Kelron, on Oct 20 2010 - 11:23, said: I demand a refund!
Ok, here it is

*pushes some air toward Keltron*



Kelron, on Oct 20 2010 - 11:23, said: I demand a refund!

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #184456

VGA, on Oct 20 2010 - 11:44, said: Kelron, on Oct 20 2010 - 11:23, said: I demand a refund!
Ok, here it is

*pushes some air toward Keltron*



Kelron, on Oct 20 2010 - 11:23, said: I demand a refund!

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #183986

LtChief, on Oct 19 2010 - 19:38, said: Will a News Announcement be posted regarding the Update tomorrow Overlord?



Evisicator, on Oct 19 2010 - 18:31, said: Overlord, on Oct 19 2010 - 13:29, said: So you suggest we close the project and quit after that? At least you are not going to burn us at the stake.

Delay is usual practice in video game industry. And at the moment it is 1-day delay.

I hardly think it is a one day delay.

I remember this time like toward the end of August that you guys had said the U.S. tanks would be coming by the end of September or early October. Which ended up that neither is the case.

At which point you added in your OP that the company wanted to desperately release everything in one patch. i.e. patch 0.6/0.7

This has not happened either. You went on to say that you may have to have an interim patch 0.5.5 Well this patch itself has missed it's mark at least twice now.

I personally don't care what is in each patch, but I do like people and certainly companies to have integrity and to take responsibility for their actions.

I have truly gotten to the point of disinterest in the game as it is taking far too long for you guys to implement any changes. I ask in all seriousness, if you have had the russians playing on a version that is two generations passed ours, what is it that we are testing. Also what gives me any incentive to test the product. I mean I am not testing anything that hasn't already been tested or fixed, as the russians have already done it 4 or 6 months ago.

Your standpoint is that well you guys have reported the bugs and we have them fixed in patch X, but instead of giving you that patch we are going to give you patch Y where the issue is still unresolved. Also there is no new changes to the game made in patch Y so just keep testing nothing, wait another two months while we iron out all of the details of patch X. In the meantime all known issues of patch X will have already been taken care of due to the fact that the russians are playing patch B.


I do want the game to be as good as it can be. I just feel it is a moot point to test something that we eventually have no impact on as we are months behind on the current version of the game.



Overlord, on Oct 19 2010 - 13:29, said: So you suggest we close the project and quit after that? At least you are not going to burn us at the stake.

Delay is usual practice in video game industry. And at the moment it is 1-day delay.



Armor9, on Oct 19 2010 - 21:13, said:
I am more talking about Overlord giving out dates.  He has given pretty "firm" dates on 3 occasions for the release of 0.5.5; each one of those dates have been missed.  Also, no reason has been given for the missed dates.  If the reason is because of bugs in 0.5.5 that doesn't make since.  Because you all released 0.5.5 to the Russians on a LIVE server.  If there was even a HINT of bugs, shouldn't it have been released to the "beta" testers first to ummm "test"?

Subject: Important Information\Updates & Patch Notes\beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #183862

BazookaDre, on 20 October 2010 - 05:07 AM, said: Yay, we're over 1000 replies!
Now to what I wanted to say and ask. First off, I'm quite alright with the one day delay, even if its the third or fourth delay, as the others were not fixed day projections anways..and when you did give us one...you missed it by a day. No biggy. I am seriously eager for the .6 update as really I just want the US tanks now and hope to see them soon. I never take a in 2-3 week guess that seriously as a ball park guess is only that, but I like it as it at least I have a guess.
Now my question, this .6.1 super test, what does that mean and how are those going? I get the impression that these are the final QA stages before the .6 patch is complete, but I think I might have missed whatever post explained it.
Thank you and sorry if this question was asked before.

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #183862

BazookaDre, on Oct 20 2010 - 04:07, said: Yay, we're over 1000 replies!    

Now to what I wanted to say and ask.  First off, I'm quite alright with the one day delay, even if its the third or fourth delay, as the others were not fixed day projections anways..and when you did give us one...you missed it by a day.  No biggy.  I am seriously eager for the .6 update as really I just want the US tanks now and hope to see them soon.  I never take a in 2-3 week guess that seriously as a ball park guess is only that, but I like it as it at least I have a guess.  

Now my question, this .6.1 super test, what does that mean and how are those going?  I get the impression that these are the final QA stages before the .6 patch is complete, but I think I might have missed whatever post explained it.

Thank you and sorry if this question was asked before.  

Subject: beta 0.6.1.5 update
Link on message: #183862

BazookaDre, on Oct 20 2010 - 04:07, said: Yay, we're over 1000 replies!    

Now to what I wanted to say and ask.  First off, I'm quite alright with the one day delay, even if its the third or fourth delay, as the others were not fixed day projections anways..and when you did give us one...you missed it by a day.  No biggy.  I am seriously eager for the .6 update as really I just want the US tanks now and hope to see them soon.  I never take a in 2-3 week guess that seriously as a ball park guess is only that, but I like it as it at least I have a guess.  

Now my question, this .6.1 super test, what does that mean and how are those going?  I get the impression that these are the final QA stages before the .6 patch is complete, but I think I might have missed whatever post explained it.

Thank you and sorry if this question was asked before.  

Subject: Archives\Beta\This band already created the soundtrack to this game.
Link on message: #183846

Subject: Archives\Beta\Open downloaded file
Link on message: #183806

Subject: Archives\Beta\Installation Freezing
Link on message: #183805

Subject: Archives\Beta\Every game, I'm matchmade with players 3-6 tiers above me.
Link on message: #183763

Subject: Archives\Beta\More info on Clan system?
Link on message: #183755

Kameho, on 20 October 2010 - 02:14 AM, said: other than the big article about the clansystem and the interview he had with gamertv
is there more info about the clansystem?
Well i'm mostly interested in the "Mercenary" system.
AS beeing a Merc is more my type, I don't like dedicated to much into other "big" clans or whatnot. But I do like fighting. I've always been the type who likes beeing small and mostly hang out with good comrades.
Althou I know me and my buddies make a good team, I doubt were ever able to make any "huge" clan. nor are we interested in beeing a huge clan either.
So far what I understood about the Mercenary system is that you are a Mercenary individually. fighting for other clans, helping them out for a price.
But im not the type that enjoy's soloing, I like playing with my friends. All i basicly wanted to know if its possible to create "Merc groups/clans", basicly clans with no alignements and are just a group of mercenaries.
Organising a Mercenary clan is something me and my buddies could definatly do.
Also it would be a bit easier for us to get hired and a get a job aswell, as then other clans know we are a Merc clan and can send out a application to Hire some of us if needed.
If there is no more info than what on the interview and such, well then its just not more info about it.
I just wanted to know and have someone to guide me there.

Subject: Game Discussion\Game Guides and Tutorials\[FAQ]What will get you experience and what will not
Link on message: #183747

Azmodanrom, on 18 October 2010 - 08:29 PM, said: what exactly is the relation between XP earned and credits earned?
i saw credits is somewhere between 20 and 30 times the XP.
but from where is the difference? i thought that everything that gives u XP gives u credits as well