Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Tanitha
Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster
20.01.2011 18:59:00
Subject: 
Off-Topic Discussion\Tanks Throughout History\Historical Armored Vehicles\Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster
Link on message: #378925
Off-Topic Discussion\Tanks Throughout History\Historical Armored Vehicles\Landkreuzer P. 1500 MonsterLink on message: #378925
Tanitha: No-one seems to have noticed this new section yet, there never was
a section on the forums for old tanks that aren't in the game.
Now there is! So I'll try to start it off.
On 23 June 1942 the German Ministry of Armaments proposed a 1,000 tonne tank – the Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte. Adolf Hitler himself expressed interest in the project and go-ahead was granted. In December the same year, Krupp designed an even larger 1,500 tonne tank – the P 1500 Monster.
In 1943, Albert Speer, the Minister for Armaments, cancelled both projects.
The Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster was to be 42 m (138 ft) long, weighing 1500 tonnes, with a 250 mm hull front armor, 4 MAN U-boat (submarine) diesel engines, and an operating crew of over 100 men.
Now there is! So I'll try to start it off.
On 23 June 1942 the German Ministry of Armaments proposed a 1,000 tonne tank – the Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte. Adolf Hitler himself expressed interest in the project and go-ahead was granted. In December the same year, Krupp designed an even larger 1,500 tonne tank – the P 1500 Monster.
In 1943, Albert Speer, the Minister for Armaments, cancelled both projects.
The Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster was to be 42 m (138 ft) long, weighing 1500 tonnes, with a 250 mm hull front armor, 4 MAN U-boat (submarine) diesel engines, and an operating crew of over 100 men.
Tanitha
Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte
20.01.2011 18:54:09
Subject: Off-Topic Discussion\Tanks Throughout History\Historical Armored Vehicles\Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte
Link on message: #378917
Off-Topic Discussion\Tanks Throughout History\Historical Armored Vehicles\Landkreuzer P. 1000 RatteLink on message: #378917
Tanitha: No-one seems to have noticed this new section yet, there never was
a section on the forums for old tanks that aren't in the game.
Now there is! So I'll try to start it off.
The Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte was to have been an extremely large tank for use by Nazi Germany during World War II. It was designed in 1942 by Krupp with the approval of Adolf Hitler, but the project was canceled by Albert Speer in early 1943 and no tank was ever completed. At 1,000 metric tons, the P-1000 would have been over five times as heavy as the Panzer VIII Maus, the largest tank ever built.
Now there is! So I'll try to start it off.
The Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte was to have been an extremely large tank for use by Nazi Germany during World War II. It was designed in 1942 by Krupp with the approval of Adolf Hitler, but the project was canceled by Albert Speer in early 1943 and no tank was ever completed. At 1,000 metric tons, the P-1000 would have been over five times as heavy as the Panzer VIII Maus, the largest tank ever built.
Tanitha
KV-VI The Russian Land Battleship
20.01.2011 18:47:43
Subject: Off-Topic Discussion\Tanks Throughout History\Historical Armored Vehicles\KV-VI The Russian Land Battleship
Link on message: #378907
Off-Topic Discussion\Tanks Throughout History\Historical Armored Vehicles\KV-VI The Russian Land BattleshipLink on message: #378907
Tanitha: No-one seems to have noticed this new section yet, there never was
a section on the forums for old tanks that aren't in the game.
Now there is! So I'll try to start it off.
Now there is! So I'll try to start it off.
Tanitha
Switching Server from US to EU
20.01.2011 18:30:53
Subject: Archives\Beta\Switching Server from US to EU
Link on message: #378882
Ryur, on 20 January 2011 - 02:11 PM, said: thank you so much for your replies..I will try opening up a TT and
requesting..without friends I'm stuck all alone..I dont think I
would have much lag issues coz ping difference between US and EU
was just 04ms..
thank you again..
Archives\Beta\Switching Server from US to EULink on message: #378882
Ryur, on 20 January 2011 - 02:11 PM, said: thank you so much for your replies..I will try opening up a TT and
requesting..without friends I'm stuck all alone..I dont think I
would have much lag issues coz ping difference between US and EU
was just 04ms..thank you again..
Tanitha: The correct answer is yes. Just download the EU client off the EU
website, and you can play on the EU server with your old
account.
What you do one one server, wont be on the other server, they are separate accounts. But you need to stay on one server, because sooner or later the one you aren't using will (probably) be banned.
Pmed reply..
Regards
What you do one one server, wont be on the other server, they are separate accounts. But you need to stay on one server, because sooner or later the one you aren't using will (probably) be banned.
Pmed reply..
Regards
Tanitha
"Free XP" and Gold
20.01.2011 17:49:47
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\"Free XP" and Gold
Link on message: #378838
khouri, on 20 January 2011 - 03:59 PM, said: Well it turns out that all the "free" XP I have currently standing
at 166,479 will take 6660 gold to convert to "free" XP this will
take me 44 days to convert it all if the 150 gold a day stays as
is.
Seems trite to call it "free" when it patently isn't.
Now instead of a "softwipe" (which a lot of players wanted)but we're not getting, why don't the Devs enable Real "free" XP whereby you can convert without using gold, would get me out of a hole and enable a final test of tanks during open beta and before the game going live.
khouri, on 19 January 2011 - 10:56 PM, said: Hi not sure if this has been answered for definite. if it has I
apologise, with all this XP I'm earning atm will I always need gold
to transfer it to "free xp" or are you doing away with that for the
last part of the beta.and making it real "free xp".
Thanks.
Overlord, on 20 January 2011 - 12:56 PM, said: Converting regular experience into free experience is going to
remain.
Archives\Junkyard\"Free XP" and GoldLink on message: #378838
khouri, on 20 January 2011 - 03:59 PM, said: Well it turns out that all the "free" XP I have currently standing
at 166,479 will take 6660 gold to convert to "free" XP this will
take me 44 days to convert it all if the 150 gold a day stays as
is.Seems trite to call it "free" when it patently isn't.
Now instead of a "softwipe" (which a lot of players wanted)but we're not getting, why don't the Devs enable Real "free" XP whereby you can convert without using gold, would get me out of a hole and enable a final test of tanks during open beta and before the game going live.
Tanitha: This is not correct.
You don't have "free" XP that needs gold to be converted to free exp..
What you have is exp on a tank that requires gold to be converted to free exp that can be used on any tank. Nowhere is the exp you have on your tank called free exp..
When you earn exp, 5% goes to free exp, the rest goes onto the tank.
Its already been stated that this will not change. When you asked overlord earlier today and you were clearly told.. no.
You don't have "free" XP that needs gold to be converted to free exp..
What you have is exp on a tank that requires gold to be converted to free exp that can be used on any tank. Nowhere is the exp you have on your tank called free exp..
When you earn exp, 5% goes to free exp, the rest goes onto the tank.
Its already been stated that this will not change. When you asked overlord earlier today and you were clearly told.. no.
khouri, on 19 January 2011 - 10:56 PM, said: Hi not sure if this has been answered for definite. if it has I
apologise, with all this XP I'm earning atm will I always need gold
to transfer it to "free xp" or are you doing away with that for the
last part of the beta.and making it real "free xp".Thanks.
Tanitha: You have already been given a lot of days of 5x exp to help out
since there was not a soft-wipe.
Going from asking overlord, to creating a Poll on the forums for the purpose of stirring up support for a softwipe or free exp transferal.
Comes under this ruling.
2.4 Off Topic, spamming and trolling
This category includes:
• Excessively communicating the same phrase, similar phrases, or pure gibberish
• Creating threads on topics that already exist on the forums, (Please use search and add to existing topics were possible)
• Offtopic Posting
• Creating threads for the sole purpose of causing unrest on the forums
• Causing disturbances in forum threads, such as picking fights, making off topic posts that ruin the thread, insulting other posters
• Making non-constructive posts, or posts with non-constructive topics
• Abusing the "Reported Post" feature by sending false alarms or nonsensical messages
• Numbering a thread, posting “First!”, “IBTL” (“in before thread lock”) or any other fad statements
• “Bumping” posts. Some sections may allow “bumping” in moderation, but users are to check the subsection of the forum to make sure that it is allowed in that section
• Petition posts or polls that are not aimed at conducting a discussion.
For which you have been placed on 7 days Read Only forum ban.
Poll removed, Thread locked, Post dumped.
Going from asking overlord, to creating a Poll on the forums for the purpose of stirring up support for a softwipe or free exp transferal.
Comes under this ruling.
2.4 Off Topic, spamming and trolling
This category includes:
• Excessively communicating the same phrase, similar phrases, or pure gibberish
• Creating threads on topics that already exist on the forums, (Please use search and add to existing topics were possible)
• Offtopic Posting
• Creating threads for the sole purpose of causing unrest on the forums
• Causing disturbances in forum threads, such as picking fights, making off topic posts that ruin the thread, insulting other posters
• Making non-constructive posts, or posts with non-constructive topics
• Abusing the "Reported Post" feature by sending false alarms or nonsensical messages
• Numbering a thread, posting “First!”, “IBTL” (“in before thread lock”) or any other fad statements
• “Bumping” posts. Some sections may allow “bumping” in moderation, but users are to check the subsection of the forum to make sure that it is allowed in that section
• Petition posts or polls that are not aimed at conducting a discussion.
For which you have been placed on 7 days Read Only forum ban.
Poll removed, Thread locked, Post dumped.
Overlord, on 20 January 2011 - 12:56 PM, said: Converting regular experience into free experience is going to
remain.Tanitha:
Overlord
NA and EU servers. Post split status.
20.01.2011 17:49:09
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\NA and EU servers. Post split status.
Link on message: #378836
Archives\Junkyard\NA and EU servers. Post split status.Link on message: #378836
Overlord: Since auto-ban system during server split was disabled, currently
players can switch between the two server groups using the same
account data, but there are 2 absolutely independent databases,
i.e. when you are playing on EU server, this won't affect your
account on NA/US server in any way.
You are strongly encouraged to decide which server you are going to stay on in the long run and play on it without switching to the other server.
Auto-ban system can be turned on without notice.
You are strongly encouraged to decide which server you are going to stay on in the long run and play on it without switching to the other server.
Auto-ban system can be turned on without notice.
Overlord
World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
20.01.2011 15:35:24
Subject: News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
Link on message: #378693
Zlorkipz, on 20 January 2011 - 03:19 PM, said: Will there be a patch on the day the game goes into the open beta
phase?
News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date AnnouncedLink on message: #378693
Zlorkipz, on 20 January 2011 - 03:19 PM, said: Will there be a patch on the day the game goes into the open beta
phase?Overlord: v.0.6.3 update is scheduled for the upcoming week.
Overlord
World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
20.01.2011 15:35:24
Subject: World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
Link on message: #378693
Zlorkipz, on Jan 20 2011 - 14:19, said: Will there be a patch on the day the game goes into the open beta
phase?
Link on message: #378693
Zlorkipz, on Jan 20 2011 - 14:19, said: Will there be a patch on the day the game goes into the open beta
phase?Overlord: v.0.6.3 update is scheduled for the upcoming week.
Overlord
World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
20.01.2011 15:35:24
Subject: World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
Link on message: #378693
Zlorkipz, on Jan 20 2011 - 14:19, said: Will there be a patch on the day the game goes into the open beta
phase?
Link on message: #378693
Zlorkipz, on Jan 20 2011 - 14:19, said: Will there be a patch on the day the game goes into the open beta
phase?Overlord: v.0.6.3 update is scheduled for the upcoming week.
Tanitha
Player/Profile statistics set back to early, tier 9 and 10 tanks + over 6.000.000 credits lost!
20.01.2011 15:35:01
Subject: Archives\Beta\Player/Profile statistics set back to early, tier 9 and 10 tanks + over 6.000.000 credits lost!
Link on message: #378690
chickenpie65, on 19 January 2011 - 03:09 PM, said: problem fixed thanks to Tanitha : )
Archives\Beta\Player/Profile statistics set back to early, tier 9 and 10 tanks + over 6.000.000 credits lost!Link on message: #378690
chickenpie65, on 19 January 2011 - 03:09 PM, said: problem fixed thanks to Tanitha : )Tanitha: NPs, glad our pm's got you sorted. Have fun..
Overlord
World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
20.01.2011 15:14:36
Subject: News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
Link on message: #378667
Retral, on 20 January 2011 - 02:44 PM, said: Can we get an official answer as to whether not a hard wipe will
happen on January 27th? Or will it be later on when the game comes
out of open beta?
Also, while we're at it.. once this official open beta launches.. will there ever be another wipe or will everything be permanent?
News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date AnnouncedLink on message: #378667
Retral, on 20 January 2011 - 02:44 PM, said: Can we get an official answer as to whether not a hard wipe will
happen on January 27th? Or will it be later on when the game comes
out of open beta?Also, while we're at it.. once this official open beta launches.. will there ever be another wipe or will everything be permanent?
Overlord: No wipe on January 27. WOT is switching to open beta and doing away
with invite system.
Overlord
World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
20.01.2011 15:14:36
Subject: World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
Link on message: #378667
Retral, on Jan 20 2011 - 13:44, said: Can we get an official answer as to whether not a hard wipe will
happen on January 27th? Or will it be later on when the game comes
out of open beta?
Also, while we're at it.. once this official open beta launches.. will there ever be another wipe or will everything be permanent?
Link on message: #378667
Retral, on Jan 20 2011 - 13:44, said: Can we get an official answer as to whether not a hard wipe will
happen on January 27th? Or will it be later on when the game comes
out of open beta?Also, while we're at it.. once this official open beta launches.. will there ever be another wipe or will everything be permanent?
Overlord: No wipe on January 27. WOT is switching to open beta and doing away
with invite system.
Overlord
World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
20.01.2011 15:14:36
Subject: World of Tanks Open Beta Launch Date Announced
Link on message: #378667
Retral, on Jan 20 2011 - 13:44, said: Can we get an official answer as to whether not a hard wipe will
happen on January 27th? Or will it be later on when the game comes
out of open beta?
Also, while we're at it.. once this official open beta launches.. will there ever be another wipe or will everything be permanent?
Link on message: #378667
Retral, on Jan 20 2011 - 13:44, said: Can we get an official answer as to whether not a hard wipe will
happen on January 27th? Or will it be later on when the game comes
out of open beta?Also, while we're at it.. once this official open beta launches.. will there ever be another wipe or will everything be permanent?
Overlord: No wipe on January 27. WOT is switching to open beta and doing away
with invite system.
Vallter
High Ping from Phoenix Arizona
20.01.2011 13:34:45
Subject: Archives\Beta\High Ping from Phoenix Arizona
Link on message: #378580
Archives\Beta\High Ping from Phoenix ArizonaLink on message: #378580
Vallter: Connection issues may occur due to several reasons. To solve the
problem, make sure that your anti-virus
software\firewall\proxy\usergate do not block the client connection
with the server. You may find out where package losses and lags
occur using the PingPlotter program (you may download it from
http://www.pingplott...m/download.html).
Close all the applications, including torrents, DC-clients, Skype, ICQ, Browser (IE, Mozilla Firefox, Opera), Mail client and etc.
1. Launch the program, and maximize the dialog window.
2. Type 174.34.231.143 in the field "Address to Trace" (upper left corner). (http://wiki.worldoft...target=pp-1.png)
3. Set 1 second in the field "Trace Interval".
4. Press the "Trace" button (lower left corner) or the "Enter" button. (http://wiki.worldoft...target=pp-2.png)
5. Now click the right mouse on each figure one by one in the upper window (green or yellow background) and select "Show this Timeline Graph" (If there is no tick apposite it - v !). (http://wiki.worldoft...target=pp-3.png)
6). As the result, there is a black band under each figure in the column and the number of diagrams should be equal to the highest number in the column. (http://wiki.worldoft...target=pp-4.png)
7. To set up the time scale on the diagrams (in the lower part of the window) it's required to click the right mouse and in the opened menu select the time scale you need. (http://wiki.worldoft...target=pp-5.png)
8. Save the results in the png-file. (In File, "Save as").
Close all the applications, including torrents, DC-clients, Skype, ICQ, Browser (IE, Mozilla Firefox, Opera), Mail client and etc.
1. Launch the program, and maximize the dialog window.
2. Type 174.34.231.143 in the field "Address to Trace" (upper left corner). (http://wiki.worldoft...target=pp-1.png)
3. Set 1 second in the field "Trace Interval".
4. Press the "Trace" button (lower left corner) or the "Enter" button. (http://wiki.worldoft...target=pp-2.png)
5. Now click the right mouse on each figure one by one in the upper window (green or yellow background) and select "Show this Timeline Graph" (If there is no tick apposite it - v !). (http://wiki.worldoft...target=pp-3.png)
6). As the result, there is a black band under each figure in the column and the number of diagrams should be equal to the highest number in the column. (http://wiki.worldoft...target=pp-4.png)
7. To set up the time scale on the diagrams (in the lower part of the window) it's required to click the right mouse and in the opened menu select the time scale you need. (http://wiki.worldoft...target=pp-5.png)
8. Save the results in the png-file. (In File, "Save as").
Vallter
Crashing during loading screen
20.01.2011 13:29:26
Subject: Archives\Beta\Crashing during loading screen
Link on message: #378573
PunchFace, on 16 January 2011 - 11:24 PM, said: Where would I find these options?
Archives\Beta\Crashing during loading screenLink on message: #378573
PunchFace, on 16 January 2011 - 11:24 PM, said: Where would I find these options?Vallter
Stay on the North American server group
20.01.2011 13:23:10
Subject: Archives\Beta\Stay on the North American server group
Link on message: #378562
Archives\Beta\Stay on the North American server groupLink on message: #378562
Vallter: We know about this issue. The problem will be solved as soon as
possible. We suggest you to play on the European server for some
time. Bet take in count that your achievements won't be
transferred.
MrVic
tier 9 mediums, again i know...
20.01.2011 08:27:23
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\tier 9 mediums, again i know...
Link on message: #378312
Kronixx, on 20 January 2011 - 08:25 AM, said: So I know this has been posted over and over bla bla with
ridiculous accounts of tier 9 medium imbalance. Well this round
JUST came up and it was so ridiculous I just had to post it, not so
much with intention of whining about it, just more or less to prove
how ridiculous the system can be with putting in tier 9 mediums. If
you thought seeing 4-6 in a game was bad, think again!
Archives\Junkyard\tier 9 mediums, again i know...Link on message: #378312
Kronixx, on 20 January 2011 - 08:25 AM, said: So I know this has been posted over and over bla bla with
ridiculous accounts of tier 9 medium imbalance. Well this round
JUST came up and it was so ridiculous I just had to post it, not so
much with intention of whining about it, just more or less to prove
how ridiculous the system can be with putting in tier 9 mediums. If
you thought seeing 4-6 in a game was bad, think again!MrVic: Please direct these kinda of posts to the balance thread in tech
section. MrVic
MrVic
US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
20.01.2011 08:17:49
Subject: Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
Link on message: #378302
Lobo, on 17 January 2011 - 12:34 PM, said: Overlord stated that you're not super-strict to time frame, since
some of Frech tank are slighly out of that frame. (never looked
into it myself)
So why don't do it for M48 too. Prototyped in end 1951. Not in 1959. So it's not Totally out of frame
Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And ImprovementsLink on message: #378302
Lobo, on 17 January 2011 - 12:34 PM, said: Overlord stated that you're not super-strict to time frame, since
some of Frech tank are slighly out of that frame. (never looked
into it myself)So why don't do it for M48 too. Prototyped in end 1951. Not in 1959. So it's not Totally out of frame
MrVic: yeah that was just my goal to start with. Worked up a first list
and then worked on info 
If they go further that works too.
Looked into some options and M48 might see something on it in time.
If they go further that works too.
Looked into some options and M48 might see something on it in time.Tanitha
So what is going to be done about the bots?
20.01.2011 08:17:19
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\So what is going to be done about the bots?
Link on message: #378301
Quote 5. Rules Enforcement
The "Automated Anti-TK Reporting System" is the system that actively scans the game logs searching for players who massively cause damage to vehicles of their own team (team damage), or intentionally destroy vehicles of their teammates (team kill).
5.01. Based on combat logs for a particular period of time, usually several days, the automated system finds players involved in friendly fire and team kill incidents. The calculations are quite complicated and the main factor that is taken into account is damage inflicted to allies to total damage ratio.
5.02. If the above ratio for a particular user exceeds a certain fixed threshold value, the system identifies the user as a violator, since his main target is doing damage to allied vehicles.
5.03. If the damage ratio for such user exceeds the verifying coefficient, introduced in order to make distinction between intentional and accidental team killers, such user is identified as an offender and goes onto the suspension list.
5.04. While calculating damage to allies / total damage ratio only the battles with team kill/damage incidents are taken into account.
5.05. In connection with the introduction of Automated Anti-TK Reporting System), listed below are set uniform measures that can be taken against offenders:
*. First detection of a user as a team killer and team-damager leads to 3-day game account suspension.
*. Second detection of a user as a team killer and team-damager (recidivism) leads to 10-day game account suspension.
*. Multiple detections of a user as a team killer and team-damager (systemic recidivism) leads to permanent game account suspension.
5.06. The Automated Anti-TK Reporting System is not meant to substitute Technical Support service; the system aims at making their work easier. The most difficult cases thereby will be solved individually via Technical Support service.
The "Automated Anti-Bot Reporting System" is the system that actively scans the game logs searching for players who use automated bots, clickers, macros, keyboard and mouse recorders[/color], or any other similar methods to accumulate credits and experience without the participation or with passive participation of the player.
5.07. In the case of detection of single or short-term signs of use of automated scripts (bot software) in user’s logs, user’s account is taken under thorough control by the administration. The owner of the account can be informed by special notifications sent to the registered e-mail.
5.08. In case of detection of signs of massive or overt use of automated scripts or botting software in user’s logs, the user’s account is suspended permanently, with a possibility of suspension being lifted in the future, after the administration conducts a complete rollback of achievements on the account deemed as obtained by violating the EULA.
5.09. Automated Anti-Bot Reporting System is not meant to substitute the Technical Support service, the system aims at making their work easier. The most difficult cases thereby will be solved individually via Technical Support service.
Archives\Junkyard\So what is going to be done about the bots?Link on message: #378301
Quote 5. Rules Enforcement
The "Automated Anti-TK Reporting System" is the system that actively scans the game logs searching for players who massively cause damage to vehicles of their own team (team damage), or intentionally destroy vehicles of their teammates (team kill).
5.01. Based on combat logs for a particular period of time, usually several days, the automated system finds players involved in friendly fire and team kill incidents. The calculations are quite complicated and the main factor that is taken into account is damage inflicted to allies to total damage ratio.
5.02. If the above ratio for a particular user exceeds a certain fixed threshold value, the system identifies the user as a violator, since his main target is doing damage to allied vehicles.
5.03. If the damage ratio for such user exceeds the verifying coefficient, introduced in order to make distinction between intentional and accidental team killers, such user is identified as an offender and goes onto the suspension list.
5.04. While calculating damage to allies / total damage ratio only the battles with team kill/damage incidents are taken into account.
5.05. In connection with the introduction of Automated Anti-TK Reporting System), listed below are set uniform measures that can be taken against offenders:
*. First detection of a user as a team killer and team-damager leads to 3-day game account suspension.
*. Second detection of a user as a team killer and team-damager (recidivism) leads to 10-day game account suspension.
*. Multiple detections of a user as a team killer and team-damager (systemic recidivism) leads to permanent game account suspension.
5.06. The Automated Anti-TK Reporting System is not meant to substitute Technical Support service; the system aims at making their work easier. The most difficult cases thereby will be solved individually via Technical Support service.
The "Automated Anti-Bot Reporting System" is the system that actively scans the game logs searching for players who use automated bots, clickers, macros, keyboard and mouse recorders[/color], or any other similar methods to accumulate credits and experience without the participation or with passive participation of the player.
5.07. In the case of detection of single or short-term signs of use of automated scripts (bot software) in user’s logs, user’s account is taken under thorough control by the administration. The owner of the account can be informed by special notifications sent to the registered e-mail.
5.08. In case of detection of signs of massive or overt use of automated scripts or botting software in user’s logs, the user’s account is suspended permanently, with a possibility of suspension being lifted in the future, after the administration conducts a complete rollback of achievements on the account deemed as obtained by violating the EULA.
5.09. Automated Anti-Bot Reporting System is not meant to substitute the Technical Support service, the system aims at making their work easier. The most difficult cases thereby will be solved individually via Technical Support service.
Tanitha: PMed reply. Thread locked.
MrVic
US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
20.01.2011 08:14:18
Subject: Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
Link on message: #378294
Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And ImprovementsLink on message: #378294
MrVic: Doing some cleaning of off topic T54 spammage :)Left the original
turret display one so it can be moved to the right forum.
Please keep it on topic.
Please keep it on topic.
Tanitha
This game is more balanced than people think
20.01.2011 07:48:51
Subject: Archives\Beta\Impressions\This game is more balanced than people think
Link on message: #378275
Archives\Beta\Impressions\This game is more balanced than people thinkLink on message: #378275
Tanitha: Thankyou for your impression, and the discussion coming from
that.
The impression section is now locked down though and to be used for one post impressions and not discussions.
If the OP would like this thread moved to the discussion section of the forums to continue the discussion, Please PM me and I'll move it and reopen it there.
The impression section is now locked down though and to be used for one post impressions and not discussions.
If the OP would like this thread moved to the discussion section of the forums to continue the discussion, Please PM me and I'll move it and reopen it there.
Tanitha
Unfair advantage for when this goes retail.
20.01.2011 07:45:03
Subject: Archives\Beta\Unfair advantage for when this goes retail.
Link on message: #378270
Archives\Beta\Unfair advantage for when this goes retail.Link on message: #378270
Tanitha: While i do, and have supported this discussion, its in the Devs
"impressions" section. The devs impression section is now simply a
section for a player to post their impressions. Which is then
approved my a moderator and then locked.
The impression section is not for discussions. So I'll move this to the discussion section for further discussion.
/Tanitha
The impression section is not for discussions. So I'll move this to the discussion section for further discussion.
/Tanitha
MrVic
Changing the American Tank Destroyer Tree
20.01.2011 07:27:35
Subject: In-Game Vehicles\American Vehicles\Tank Destroyers\Changing the American Tank Destroyer Tree
Link on message: #378252
In-Game Vehicles\American Vehicles\Tank Destroyers\Changing the American Tank Destroyer TreeLink on message: #378252
MrVic: Hehe Ontos the black sheep of the US armed forces. Prototyped I
think in the 1955? Was built and run through its paces, then was
summarily rejected by all branches of the armed forces. Then in
desperation for air lift able tank the US Marine Corps order about
300 due to there being no other option. Its greatest perk was
ability to travel about anywhere due to light weight. Draw backs
were the 106mm guns only had 18 rounds for all 6 guns total. 3/16"
thick armor floor so mines were their bane. The back blast from the
recoilless rifles were so large that their location was given away
instantly combined with if any friendly troops were remotely near
its rear they were killed. The big killer was a crew member had to
climb outside the tank to load it... Also it had a tendency to fire
prematurely. Its greatest use was a AT gun in a fortified position
and improvised to be used for anti infantry which it preformed well
at
It was well like by the troops and deemed very useful in Vietnam but overall well ehh
Be a fun Premium not sure I want to level through one tho
It was well like by the troops and deemed very useful in Vietnam but overall well ehh
Be a fun Premium not sure I want to level through one tho
MrVic
Changing the American Tank Destroyer Tree
20.01.2011 07:27:35
Subject: Changing the American Tank Destroyer Tree
Link on message: #378252
Link on message: #378252
MrVic: Hehe Ontos the black sheep of the US armed forces.
Prototyped I think in the 1955? Was built and run
through its paces, then was summarily rejected by all branches of
the armed forces. Then in desperation for air lift able
tank the US Marine Corps order about 300 due to there being no
other option. Its greatest perk was ability to travel
about anywhere due to light weight. Draw backs were the 106mm guns
only had 18 rounds for all 6 guns total. 3/16" thick armor floor so
mines were their bane. The back blast from the recoilless rifles
were so large that their location was given away instantly combined
with if any friendly troops were remotely near its rear they were
killed. The big killer was a crew member had to climb outside the
tank to load it... Also it had a tendency to fire
prematurely. Its greatest use was a AT gun in a
fortified position and improvised to be used for anti infantry
which it preformed well at 
It was well like by the troops and deemed very useful in Vietnam but overall well ehh
Be a fun Premium not sure I want to level through one tho
It was well like by the troops and deemed very useful in Vietnam but overall well ehh
Be a fun Premium not sure I want to level through one tho
MrVic
Changing the American Tank Destroyer Tree
20.01.2011 07:27:35
Subject: Changing the American Tank Destroyer Tree
Link on message: #378252
Link on message: #378252
MrVic: Hehe Ontos the black sheep of the US armed forces.
Prototyped I think in the 1955? Was built and run
through its paces, then was summarily rejected by all branches of
the armed forces. Then in desperation for air lift able
tank the US Marine Corps order about 300 due to there being no
other option. Its greatest perk was ability to travel
about anywhere due to light weight. Draw backs were the 106mm guns
only had 18 rounds for all 6 guns total. 3/16" thick armor floor so
mines were their bane. The back blast from the recoilless rifles
were so large that their location was given away instantly combined
with if any friendly troops were remotely near its rear they were
killed. The big killer was a crew member had to climb outside the
tank to load it... Also it had a tendency to fire
prematurely. Its greatest use was a AT gun in a
fortified position and improvised to be used for anti infantry
which it preformed well at
It was well like by the troops and deemed very useful in Vietnam but overall well ehh
Be a fun Premium not sure I want to level through one tho
It was well like by the troops and deemed very useful in Vietnam but overall well ehh
Be a fun Premium not sure I want to level through one tho
MrVic
[DD] DoubleDutchclan Recruiting!
20.01.2011 06:38:59
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\[DD] DoubleDutchclan Recruiting!
Link on message: #378228
Archives\Junkyard\[DD] DoubleDutchclan Recruiting!Link on message: #378228
MrVic: Bent u op de Noord-Amerika server of Euro-server? Dit forum is het
in Noord-Amerika server. Hier is een link naar de Euro Server
indien nodig.
http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/
Closing the USA thread. Please refer to the euro forums.
Good luck with the clanwars. /Tanitha
http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/
Closing the USA thread. Please refer to the euro forums.
Good luck with the clanwars. /Tanitha
MrVic
Reverse slope and hull down
20.01.2011 06:34:36
Subject: Archives\Beta\Reverse slope and hull down
Link on message: #378225
The_Pud, on 20 January 2011 - 06:29 AM, said: G'day all
I did a search and nothing came up so sorry this should have already been asked but I cant find the answer.
1)Does armour slope increase chance of deflection or does it only increase the effective thickness of the armour? Or is it one and the same thing?
2) Placing a unit hull down on the revese slope of a rise which has an obvious (visual) increase in armour slope, does this actually affect the effective slope of the armour or is it just cosmetic? I am so used to playing games like Combat Mission where shoot and scoot from a reverse slope is so effective. I havent been able to replicate it in WOT (granted my playing time is short). Reason being is I have just got to Hetzer and that AFV has huge advantages attacking from a reverse slope (thin armour).
I only started playing this game a week ago and I am in seventh heaven
Archives\Beta\Reverse slope and hull downLink on message: #378225
The_Pud, on 20 January 2011 - 06:29 AM, said: G'day allI did a search and nothing came up so sorry this should have already been asked but I cant find the answer.
1)Does armour slope increase chance of deflection or does it only increase the effective thickness of the armour? Or is it one and the same thing?
2) Placing a unit hull down on the revese slope of a rise which has an obvious (visual) increase in armour slope, does this actually affect the effective slope of the armour or is it just cosmetic? I am so used to playing games like Combat Mission where shoot and scoot from a reverse slope is so effective. I havent been able to replicate it in WOT (granted my playing time is short). Reason being is I have just got to Hetzer and that AFV has huge advantages attacking from a reverse slope (thin armour).
I only started playing this game a week ago and I am in seventh heaven
MrVic: Effects both
Shallower slope greatly increases armor effective thickness (usually what happens when you fire a 225mm pen weapon at a 30mm tank and get a bounce)
Also the deflection chance alone increases greatly.
I had a good example a few weeks ago IS-7 fired a round at my SU-85, I was turning at the time the round hit my side armor at about
10 degree sloped angle.
the round bounced, due to the angle my effective armor was about 240mm plus deflection of such a shallow angle
Shallower slope greatly increases armor effective thickness (usually what happens when you fire a 225mm pen weapon at a 30mm tank and get a bounce)
Also the deflection chance alone increases greatly.
I had a good example a few weeks ago IS-7 fired a round at my SU-85, I was turning at the time
the round hit my side armor at about
10 degree sloped angle.the round bounced, due to the angle my effective armor was about 240mm plus deflection of such a shallow angle
MrVic
reporting some one illegitimate
20.01.2011 05:28:24
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\reporting some one illegitimate
Link on message: #378158
Archives\Junkyard\reporting some one illegitimateLink on message: #378158
MrVic: Closing Lert ^^ has it right tho
MrVic
Is this fair?
20.01.2011 03:33:51
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Is this fair?
Link on message: #378054
Archives\Junkyard\Is this fair?Link on message: #378054
MrVic: Closing, Posters above spelled out the correct action, TKing is bad
Screen shot and report in the future
Thanks
Screen shot and report in the future
ThanksOverlord
Better than a softwipe!
19.01.2011 22:22:40
Subject: Archives\Beta\Better than a softwipe!
Link on message: #377774
how2skate_com, on 19 January 2011 - 04:26 PM, said: Crazy idea: they just want to test the capacity of the new servers,
so they give this reward to encourage everyone to play a lot.
Just an idea though, I can't be sure :-)
Archives\Beta\Better than a softwipe!Link on message: #377774
how2skate_com, on 19 January 2011 - 04:26 PM, said: Crazy idea: they just want to test the capacity of the new servers,
so they give this reward to encourage everyone to play a lot.Just an idea though, I can't be sure :-)
Overlord: There is no need to test the capacity of new hardware. It's more
than sufficient for the current number of registered players. EU
servers can held up to 90k players online at once, US one - up to
75k.
Experience and credit rates were increased to make up for the cancelled softwipe.
Experience and credit rates were increased to make up for the cancelled softwipe.
Overlord
Unscheduled Server Restart, January 20
19.01.2011 22:13:43
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Unscheduled Server Restart, January 20
Link on message: #377766
Archives\Junkyard\Unscheduled Server Restart, January 20Link on message: #377766
Overlord: Game servers are going to be restarted on January 20, 6:00 am
EST.
Estimated downtime: up to 30 minutes.
Estimated downtime: up to 30 minutes.
ARGO
How do you one-shot a T44?
19.01.2011 21:56:55
Subject: Archives\Beta\How do you one-shot a T44?
Link on message: #377751
Archives\Beta\How do you one-shot a T44?Link on message: #377751
ARGO: Aim what ever you got directly at the drivers sight slit in the
front of the tank dead center directly underneath the main gun. I
have seen this happen many times.
MrVic
How do you one-shot a T44?
19.01.2011 21:50:20
Subject: Archives\Beta\How do you one-shot a T44?
Link on message: #377740
Archives\Beta\How do you one-shot a T44?Link on message: #377740
MrVic: Ammo Rack hit hard enough pretty much will one shot any tank. Some
tanks are just harder to get to the ammo rack.
T-44 packs a ton of ammo into a rather small tank. They pretty much stuffed ammo everywhere... There is a stack of 35 shells in the front corner of the tank
For reference
http://ts3.mm.bing.n...c1bb1&index=ch1
T-44 packs a ton of ammo into a rather small tank. They pretty much stuffed ammo everywhere... There is a stack of 35 shells in the front corner of the tank
For reference
http://ts3.mm.bing.n...c1bb1&index=ch1
MrVic
curious........
19.01.2011 21:42:29
Subject: Archives\Beta\curious........
Link on message: #377735
Kleiner_Vance, on 19 January 2011 - 09:38 PM, said: It will probably be just a patch.
Archives\Beta\curious........Link on message: #377735
Kleiner_Vance, on 19 January 2011 - 09:38 PM, said: It will probably be just a patch.MrVic: Aye I doubt it would be a whole new download just a update to
release version
MrVic
Balance? what balance?
19.01.2011 21:39:42
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Balance? what balance?
Link on message: #377730
Czechman, on 19 January 2011 - 09:12 PM, said: I don't generally post to the forum but I do read the posts,
however after the battle I just finished I am really pissed off. I
have over 3000 battles and I accept that the balance isn't perfect.
I consider it a challenge when the other side has more powerful
tanks then my side. But when there are 8 T-54 on the other side
this is getting ridiculous.
If this isn't fixed in some way I will not continue when is goes retail. I really enjoy WOT and I would hate to stop playing it but with this kind of balance it takes all the fun out of it when you're up against 8 greyhound tanks.
shot_018.jpg
Archives\Junkyard\Balance? what balance?Link on message: #377730
Czechman, on 19 January 2011 - 09:12 PM, said: I don't generally post to the forum but I do read the posts,
however after the battle I just finished I am really pissed off. I
have over 3000 battles and I accept that the balance isn't perfect.
I consider it a challenge when the other side has more powerful
tanks then my side. But when there are 8 T-54 on the other side
this is getting ridiculous.If this isn't fixed in some way I will not continue when is goes retail. I really enjoy WOT and I would hate to stop playing it but with this kind of balance it takes all the fun out of it when you're up against 8 greyhound tanks.
shot_018.jpgMrVic: Please direct your feedback on balance to the main discussion to
better keep the info collected. http://forum.worldof...g-system-v0627/
Feel free to repost it there, Thanks MrVic
Feel free to repost it there, Thanks MrVic
ARGO
Game won't start after update to newest nvidia drivers
19.01.2011 20:24:20
Subject: Archives\Beta\Game won't start after update to newest nvidia drivers
Link on message: #377666
Archives\Beta\Game won't start after update to newest nvidia driversLink on message: #377666
ARGO: Roll back your driver, you have that option.....
Tanitha
Well thank you ...
19.01.2011 17:38:50
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Well thank you ...
Link on message: #377483
Archives\Junkyard\Well thank you ...Link on message: #377483
Tanitha: Moved your historical battles posts back into the thread they came
from.
Sorry for the mixup.
Closing thread /Tanitha
Sorry for the mixup.
Closing thread /Tanitha
Tanitha
Well thank you ...
19.01.2011 17:27:16
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Well thank you ...
Link on message: #377474
ZorinWarfield, on 19 January 2011 - 04:55 PM, said: All these were moved to the junkyard. I made a post in the Dev
section (Questions) but that turned out as not being approved in
which I asked what happened to the threads. PMing a admin or Dev
has been fruitless during the last week, so I didn't even bother
this time.
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
They were previously in the Team Challenge Section, which was inappropriate already, IMO.
Archives\Junkyard\Well thank you ...Link on message: #377474
ZorinWarfield, on 19 January 2011 - 04:55 PM, said: All these were moved to the junkyard. I made a post in the Dev
section (Questions) but that turned out as not being approved in
which I asked what happened to the threads. PMing a admin or Dev
has been fruitless during the last week, so I didn't even bother
this time.http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
They were previously in the Team Challenge Section, which was inappropriate already, IMO.
Tanitha: Right, now we are getting there : )
For starters, they were in the "Team / Company Challenge Meeting Place" under the heading of Clan, Team & Platoon Recruiting Subforums
With us swapping to USA forums / servers. I cleaned (dumped) the looking for a clan, looking for a teams, looking for a company sections, which were heavy with euro players looking for the above.
In the clan cleanout, the section you had these in was dumped. I'm putting them back. I apologize, wont be too long in fixing it back..
For starters, they were in the "Team / Company Challenge Meeting Place" under the heading of Clan, Team & Platoon Recruiting Subforums
With us swapping to USA forums / servers. I cleaned (dumped) the looking for a clan, looking for a teams, looking for a company sections, which were heavy with euro players looking for the above.
In the clan cleanout, the section you had these in was dumped. I'm putting them back. I apologize, wont be too long in fixing it back..
Overlord
T54 Armor Is Totally Messed Up
19.01.2011 17:22:00
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\T54 Armor Is Totally Messed Up
Link on message: #377469
Archives\Junkyard\T54 Armor Is Totally Messed UpLink on message: #377469
Overlord: One more topic on T-54.
Closed.
Closed.
ARGO
Why does World of Tanks have to Be wiped?
19.01.2011 16:58:20
Subject: Archives\Beta\Why does World of Tanks have to Be wiped?
Link on message: #377442
t2commander, on 19 January 2011 - 02:11 AM, said: From what I've heard is that in about 28 days US and EU servers
will come out of Beta testing, people are saying that the creators
will wipe US and EU servers and i ask why do you have to wipe away
my beautiful tanks?...
Archives\Beta\Why does World of Tanks have to Be wiped?Link on message: #377442
t2commander, on 19 January 2011 - 02:11 AM, said: From what I've heard is that in about 28 days US and EU servers
will come out of Beta testing, people are saying that the creators
will wipe US and EU servers and i ask why do you have to wipe away
my beautiful tanks?...ARGO: You will hear many excuses regarding this, but I will provide you
with a logical one:
As all businesses WoT makes games to make money that is a fact for any business and to make money you need to attract customers and build a "fan base".
Now think of it as if you where a brand spanking new player if on the 1st day of the game debut you download it, join the forums, spend your hard earned $$$ on gold to get going and you go into your 1st match only to be blown away by a Maus or IS7. You then give it the old college try for a few more hours only to end up in all kinds of matches your tier 1 cannot handle. You have all said it yourself on many occasions..."How fun is that?" So in short, My opinion would be that they would want to attract new players, not drive them away.
As all businesses WoT makes games to make money that is a fact for any business and to make money you need to attract customers and build a "fan base".
Now think of it as if you where a brand spanking new player if on the 1st day of the game debut you download it, join the forums, spend your hard earned $$$ on gold to get going and you go into your 1st match only to be blown away by a Maus or IS7. You then give it the old college try for a few more hours only to end up in all kinds of matches your tier 1 cannot handle. You have all said it yourself on many occasions..."How fun is that?" So in short, My opinion would be that they would want to attract new players, not drive them away.
Реклама | Adv