Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Mugsy_
British Valentine AT Balance
09.03.2013 04:25:00
Subject: British Valentine AT Balance
Link on message: #3917433
Link on message: #3917433
Mugsy_: How do you feel this tank destroyer holds up against its peers?
Vote and share your thoughts below!
Thank you.
Vote and share your thoughts below!
Thank you.
Mugsy_
British Universal Carrier 2 Balance
09.03.2013 04:17:08
Subject: British Universal Carrier 2 Balance
Link on message: #3917383
Link on message: #3917383
Mugsy_: How does this Tier 2 Tank Destroyer stack up against its peers?
Vote and share your thoughts!
Vote and share your thoughts!
Mugsy_
British Universal Carrier 2 Balance
09.03.2013 04:17:08
Subject: British Universal Carrier 2 Balance
Link on message: #3917383
Link on message: #3917383
Mugsy_: How does this Tier 2 Tank Destroyer stack up against its peers?
Vote and share your thoughts!
Vote and share your thoughts!
Mugsy_
British Universal Carrier 2 Balance
09.03.2013 04:17:08
Subject: British Universal Carrier 2 Balance
Link on message: #3917383
Link on message: #3917383
Mugsy_: How does this Tier 2 Tank Destroyer stack up against its peers?
Vote and share your thoughts!
Vote and share your thoughts!
Captain_Judo
Kasserine Pass Challenge
09.03.2013 04:05:23
Subject: Kasserine Pass Challenge
Link on message: #3917314
Link on message: #3917314
Captain_Judo: The Kasserine Pass Challenge is complete. Welcome River of Blood
[W-A-R] back to the winner's seat!
There's no ifs, ands or buts about it- River of Blood [W-A-R] is a winning machine. Making an argument for the best eSports team on the NA server is subject matter for the guys at PTI & Around The Horn
But I guarantee they'd argue
for River of Blood [W-A-R] at the top of their lists 
Canaduck
CptBlood
DocGolem
dopper
Lapse
LOBSTER_MOBSTER
SaVaGee
Striker_002
2nd place - S.I.M.P.
3rd place - Sarcastic Gophers
4th place - BSTI [BSTI]
Onward to the Kharkov Challenge!
There's no ifs, ands or buts about it- River of Blood [W-A-R] is a winning machine. Making an argument for the best eSports team on the NA server is subject matter for the guys at PTI & Around The Horn
But I guarantee they'd argue
for River of Blood [W-A-R] at the top of their lists Canaduck
CptBlood
DocGolem
dopper
Lapse
LOBSTER_MOBSTER
SaVaGee
Striker_002
2nd place - S.I.M.P.
3rd place - Sarcastic Gophers
4th place - BSTI [BSTI]
Onward to the Kharkov Challenge!
Captain_Judo
Kasserine Pass Challenge
09.03.2013 04:05:23
Subject: Kasserine Pass Challenge
Link on message: #3917314
Link on message: #3917314
Captain_Judo: The Kasserine Pass Challenge is complete. Welcome River of Blood
[W-A-R] back to the winner's seat!
There's no ifs, ands or buts about it- River of Blood [W-A-R] is a winning machine. Making an argument for the best eSports team on the NA server is subject matter for the guys at PTI & Around The Horn
But I guarantee they'd argue
for River of Blood [W-A-R] at the top of their lists 
Canaduck
CptBlood
DocGolem
dopper
Lapse
LOBSTER_MOBSTER
SaVaGee
Striker_002
2nd place - S.I.M.P.
3rd place - Sarcastic Gophers
4th place - BSTI [BSTI]
Onward to the Kharkov Challenge!
There's no ifs, ands or buts about it- River of Blood [W-A-R] is a winning machine. Making an argument for the best eSports team on the NA server is subject matter for the guys at PTI & Around The Horn
But I guarantee they'd argue
for River of Blood [W-A-R] at the top of their lists Canaduck
CptBlood
DocGolem
dopper
Lapse
LOBSTER_MOBSTER
SaVaGee
Striker_002
2nd place - S.I.M.P.
3rd place - Sarcastic Gophers
4th place - BSTI [BSTI]
Onward to the Kharkov Challenge!
Captain_Judo
Kasserine Pass Challenge
09.03.2013 04:05:23
Subject: Kasserine Pass Challenge
Link on message: #3917314
Link on message: #3917314
Captain_Judo: The Kasserine Pass Challenge is complete. Welcome River of Blood
[W-A-R] back to the winner's seat!
There's no ifs, ands or buts about it- River of Blood [W-A-R] is a winning machine. Making an argument for the best eSports team on the NA server is subject matter for the guys at PTI & Around The Horn But I guarantee they'd argue
for River of Blood [W-A-R] at the top of their lists
Canaduck
CptBlood
DocGolem
dopper
Lapse
LOBSTER_MOBSTER
SaVaGee
Striker_002
2nd place - S.I.M.P.
3rd place - Sarcastic Gophers
4th place - BSTI [BSTI]
Onward to the Kharkov Challenge!
There's no ifs, ands or buts about it- River of Blood [W-A-R] is a winning machine. Making an argument for the best eSports team on the NA server is subject matter for the guys at PTI & Around The Horn
But I guarantee they'd argue
for River of Blood [W-A-R] at the top of their lists Canaduck
CptBlood
DocGolem
dopper
Lapse
LOBSTER_MOBSTER
SaVaGee
Striker_002
2nd place - S.I.M.P.
3rd place - Sarcastic Gophers
4th place - BSTI [BSTI]
Onward to the Kharkov Challenge!
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
09.03.2013 03:39:25
Subject: World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
Link on message: #3917146
Horace73, on Mar 09 2013 - 03:06, said: Last week we lost in the 1/64 which stated "The 32 losing teams,
from this round, advance to the losers bracket and remain in
contention for the Minor League."
Once again it is 2.5 hours before the next time of battle... and Veterans of War[VOW] has no scheduled battle.... you've had a week to get something up !!!!
Or is this another bye like the first match up in 1/128??
RedPrince42, on Mar 08 2013 - 00:42, said: I think I need a clarification here:
Does this mean the advantage at the end of the battle or in tanks brought to the battle? I originally understood it as the latter, but your comment seems to imply the former. Also, if it is at the end of battles, is that cumulative for all battles that end in a Draw.
Another question, if it is at the end of battle . . . who wins the round in the following scenario?
Battle 1: Team A wins (1-0)
Battle 2: Team B wins (1-1)
Battle 3: Draw, 10 point advantage in favor of Team A (1-1 or 2-1?)
Battle 4: Team B wins (1-2 or 2-2?)
Battle 5: Team A wins (2-2 or 3-2 victory?)
Battle 6: Team B wins (2-3 loss?)
By appeal, Team A wins in the 5th battle, based on the tier point advantage from the 3rd? Or is this only applied if the teams play the maximum number of games that are allowed?
Sorry if this is confusing, but if we are going to use the rules correctly, we need to understand them as they are intended to be used.
Link on message: #3917146
Horace73, on Mar 09 2013 - 03:06, said: Last week we lost in the 1/64 which stated "The 32 losing teams,
from this round, advance to the losers bracket and remain in
contention for the Minor League."Once again it is 2.5 hours before the next time of battle... and Veterans of War[VOW] has no scheduled battle.... you've had a week to get something up !!!!
Or is this another bye like the first match up in 1/128??
Captain_Judo: Yes, unfortunately, if you lost before tonight, you're eliminated
from qualifying for the Major and Minor Leagues for this Spring
Season. 
RedPrince42, on Mar 08 2013 - 00:42, said: I think I need a clarification here:Does this mean the advantage at the end of the battle or in tanks brought to the battle? I originally understood it as the latter, but your comment seems to imply the former. Also, if it is at the end of battles, is that cumulative for all battles that end in a Draw.
Another question, if it is at the end of battle . . . who wins the round in the following scenario?
Battle 1: Team A wins (1-0)
Battle 2: Team B wins (1-1)
Battle 3: Draw, 10 point advantage in favor of Team A (1-1 or 2-1?)
Battle 4: Team B wins (1-2 or 2-2?)
Battle 5: Team A wins (2-2 or 3-2 victory?)
Battle 6: Team B wins (2-3 loss?)
By appeal, Team A wins in the 5th battle, based on the tier point advantage from the 3rd? Or is this only applied if the teams play the maximum number of games that are allowed?
Sorry if this is confusing, but if we are going to use the rules correctly, we need to understand them as they are intended to be used.
Captain_Judo: The advantage at the end of the battle when the battle is
complete.
As for the scenario you drew, Team A would have a 2-1 advantage after the 3rd battle. By submitting the requested "paperwork" they would be determined as the winner after Battle 5.
As for the scenario you drew, Team A would have a 2-1 advantage after the 3rd battle. By submitting the requested "paperwork" they would be determined as the winner after Battle 5.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
09.03.2013 03:39:25
Subject: World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
Link on message: #3917146
Horace73, on Mar 09 2013 - 02:06, said: Last week we lost in the 1/64 which stated "The 32 losing teams,
from this round, advance to the losers bracket and remain in
contention for the Minor League."
Once again it is 2.5 hours before the next time of battle... and Veterans of War[VOW] has no scheduled battle.... you've had a week to get something up !!!!
Or is this another bye like the first match up in 1/128??
RedPrince42, on Mar 07 2013 - 23:42, said: I think I need a clarification here:
Does this mean the advantage at the end of the battle or in tanks brought to the battle? I originally understood it as the latter, but your comment seems to imply the former. Also, if it is at the end of battles, is that cumulative for all battles that end in a Draw.
Another question, if it is at the end of battle . . . who wins the round in the following scenario?
Battle 1: Team A wins (1-0)
Battle 2: Team B wins (1-1)
Battle 3: Draw, 10 point advantage in favor of Team A (1-1 or 2-1?)
Battle 4: Team B wins (1-2 or 2-2?)
Battle 5: Team A wins (2-2 or 3-2 victory?)
Battle 6: Team B wins (2-3 loss?)
By appeal, Team A wins in the 5th battle, based on the tier point advantage from the 3rd? Or is this only applied if the teams play the maximum number of games that are allowed?
Sorry if this is confusing, but if we are going to use the rules correctly, we need to understand them as they are intended to be used.
Link on message: #3917146
Horace73, on Mar 09 2013 - 02:06, said: Last week we lost in the 1/64 which stated "The 32 losing teams,
from this round, advance to the losers bracket and remain in
contention for the Minor League."Once again it is 2.5 hours before the next time of battle... and Veterans of War[VOW] has no scheduled battle.... you've had a week to get something up !!!!
Or is this another bye like the first match up in 1/128??
Captain_Judo:
Yes, unfortunately, if you lost before tonight, you're eliminated from qualifying for the Major and Minor Leagues for this Spring Season.
Yes, unfortunately, if you lost before tonight, you're eliminated from qualifying for the Major and Minor Leagues for this Spring Season.
RedPrince42, on Mar 07 2013 - 23:42, said: I think I need a clarification here:Does this mean the advantage at the end of the battle or in tanks brought to the battle? I originally understood it as the latter, but your comment seems to imply the former. Also, if it is at the end of battles, is that cumulative for all battles that end in a Draw.
Another question, if it is at the end of battle . . . who wins the round in the following scenario?
Battle 1: Team A wins (1-0)
Battle 2: Team B wins (1-1)
Battle 3: Draw, 10 point advantage in favor of Team A (1-1 or 2-1?)
Battle 4: Team B wins (1-2 or 2-2?)
Battle 5: Team A wins (2-2 or 3-2 victory?)
Battle 6: Team B wins (2-3 loss?)
By appeal, Team A wins in the 5th battle, based on the tier point advantage from the 3rd? Or is this only applied if the teams play the maximum number of games that are allowed?
Sorry if this is confusing, but if we are going to use the rules correctly, we need to understand them as they are intended to be used.
Captain_Judo:
The advantage at the end of the battle when the battle is complete.
As for the scenario you drew, Team A would have a 2-1 advantage after the 3rd battle. By submitting the requested "paperwork" they would be determined as the winner after Battle 5.
The advantage at the end of the battle when the battle is complete.
As for the scenario you drew, Team A would have a 2-1 advantage after the 3rd battle. By submitting the requested "paperwork" they would be determined as the winner after Battle 5.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
09.03.2013 03:39:25
Subject: World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
Link on message: #3917146
Horace73, on Mar 09 2013 - 02:06, said: Last week we lost in the 1/64 which stated "The 32 losing teams,
from this round, advance to the losers bracket and remain in
contention for the Minor League."
Once again it is 2.5 hours before the next time of battle... and Veterans of War[VOW] has no scheduled battle.... you've had a week to get something up !!!!
Or is this another bye like the first match up in 1/128??
RedPrince42, on Mar 07 2013 - 23:42, said: I think I need a clarification here:
Does this mean the advantage at the end of the battle or in tanks brought to the battle? I originally understood it as the latter, but your comment seems to imply the former. Also, if it is at the end of battles, is that cumulative for all battles that end in a Draw.
Another question, if it is at the end of battle . . . who wins the round in the following scenario?
Battle 1: Team A wins (1-0)
Battle 2: Team B wins (1-1)
Battle 3: Draw, 10 point advantage in favor of Team A (1-1 or 2-1?)
Battle 4: Team B wins (1-2 or 2-2?)
Battle 5: Team A wins (2-2 or 3-2 victory?)
Battle 6: Team B wins (2-3 loss?)
By appeal, Team A wins in the 5th battle, based on the tier point advantage from the 3rd? Or is this only applied if the teams play the maximum number of games that are allowed?
Sorry if this is confusing, but if we are going to use the rules correctly, we need to understand them as they are intended to be used.
Link on message: #3917146
Horace73, on Mar 09 2013 - 02:06, said: Last week we lost in the 1/64 which stated "The 32 losing teams,
from this round, advance to the losers bracket and remain in
contention for the Minor League."Once again it is 2.5 hours before the next time of battle... and Veterans of War[VOW] has no scheduled battle.... you've had a week to get something up !!!!
Or is this another bye like the first match up in 1/128??
Captain_Judo:
Yes, unfortunately, if you lost before tonight, you're eliminated from qualifying for the Major and Minor Leagues for this Spring Season.
Yes, unfortunately, if you lost before tonight, you're eliminated from qualifying for the Major and Minor Leagues for this Spring Season.
RedPrince42, on Mar 07 2013 - 23:42, said: I think I need a clarification here:Does this mean the advantage at the end of the battle or in tanks brought to the battle? I originally understood it as the latter, but your comment seems to imply the former. Also, if it is at the end of battles, is that cumulative for all battles that end in a Draw.
Another question, if it is at the end of battle . . . who wins the round in the following scenario?
Battle 1: Team A wins (1-0)
Battle 2: Team B wins (1-1)
Battle 3: Draw, 10 point advantage in favor of Team A (1-1 or 2-1?)
Battle 4: Team B wins (1-2 or 2-2?)
Battle 5: Team A wins (2-2 or 3-2 victory?)
Battle 6: Team B wins (2-3 loss?)
By appeal, Team A wins in the 5th battle, based on the tier point advantage from the 3rd? Or is this only applied if the teams play the maximum number of games that are allowed?
Sorry if this is confusing, but if we are going to use the rules correctly, we need to understand them as they are intended to be used.
Captain_Judo:
The advantage at the end of the battle when the battle is complete.
As for the scenario you drew, Team A would have a 2-1 advantage after the 3rd battle. By submitting the requested "paperwork" they would be determined as the winner after Battle 5.
The advantage at the end of the battle when the battle is complete.
As for the scenario you drew, Team A would have a 2-1 advantage after the 3rd battle. By submitting the requested "paperwork" they would be determined as the winner after Battle 5.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
09.03.2013 03:30:14
Subject: World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
Link on message: #3917083
Link on message: #3917083
Captain_Judo: The tournament page is updated showing Sunday's tiebreakers and all
teams advancing to the second round. As indicated, the top three
teams from each group advance. You may notice one additional team
that did not participate in the first round, group stage. Team Game
Knight Crew was specially invited to the second round after an
unfortunate error, we made, during the 'No Sleep Til Brooklyn
Rumble'.
Official groups for the second round will be posted after this Sunday's tiebreakers are complete.
As an fyi, the group stage is hidden from view only for the sake of clarity. The results can be displayed, if necessary, and will permanently return when the tournament is complete.
Official groups for the second round will be posted after this Sunday's tiebreakers are complete.
As an fyi, the group stage is hidden from view only for the sake of clarity. The results can be displayed, if necessary, and will permanently return when the tournament is complete.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
09.03.2013 03:30:14
Subject: World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
Link on message: #3917083
Link on message: #3917083
Captain_Judo: The tournament page is updated showing Sunday's tiebreakers and all
teams advancing to the second round. As indicated, the top three
teams from each group advance. You may notice one additional team
that did not participate in the first round, group stage. Team Game
Knight Crew was specially invited to the second round after an
unfortunate error, we made, during the 'No Sleep Til Brooklyn
Rumble'.
Official groups for the second round will be posted after this Sunday's tiebreakers are complete.
As an fyi, the group stage is hidden from view only for the sake of clarity. The results can be displayed, if necessary, and will permanently return when the tournament is complete.
Official groups for the second round will be posted after this Sunday's tiebreakers are complete.
As an fyi, the group stage is hidden from view only for the sake of clarity. The results can be displayed, if necessary, and will permanently return when the tournament is complete.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
09.03.2013 03:30:14
Subject: World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
Link on message: #3917083
Link on message: #3917083
Captain_Judo: The tournament page is updated showing Sunday's tiebreakers and all
teams advancing to the second round. As indicated, the top three
teams from each group advance. You may notice one additional team
that did not participate in the first round, group stage. Team Game
Knight Crew was specially invited to the second round after an
unfortunate error, we made, during the 'No Sleep Til Brooklyn
Rumble'.
Official groups for the second round will be posted after this Sunday's tiebreakers are complete.
As an fyi, the group stage is hidden from view only for the sake of clarity. The results can be displayed, if necessary, and will permanently return when the tournament is complete.
Official groups for the second round will be posted after this Sunday's tiebreakers are complete.
As an fyi, the group stage is hidden from view only for the sake of clarity. The results can be displayed, if necessary, and will permanently return when the tournament is complete.
Yoott
Major_Rampage's tank company--does it exist?
09.03.2013 03:13:13
Subject: Major_Rampage's tank company--does it exist?
Link on message: #3916989
Link on message: #3916989
Yoott: guys the stream is 2 minutes behind on a delay so don't use that to
go into Que..... this week Rampage did a poll and the votes were in
that he no longer announces the team joining Q in order to make the
TC battles more random and to stop same teams getting Qued in with
the WGNA team over and over...
so its random... play for fun... have good battles... hopefully you will get us ..... we normally play 20- 25ish games in the time we have.... we are 13 and 2 atm right now tonight....so far
so its random... play for fun... have good battles... hopefully you will get us ..... we normally play 20- 25ish games in the time we have.... we are 13 and 2 atm right now tonight....so far
Agrona
Rampage's Ruckus: Junior Tank Company, March 8th
09.03.2013 02:36:50
Subject: Rampage's Ruckus: Junior Tank Company, March 8th
Link on message: #3916832
Link on message: #3916832
Agrona: I am clearly just too good at this game 
Good times
today fellas! I might have to come bug you at these every time!
Good times
today fellas! I might have to come bug you at these every time!Mugsy_
Tracers need to be Re-worked again?
09.03.2013 00:32:05
Subject: Tracers need to be Re-worked again?
Link on message: #3915942
DarkKaiser810, on Mar 09 2013 - 00:31, said: i still think tracers should be fixed a little better.
Link on message: #3915942
DarkKaiser810, on Mar 09 2013 - 00:31, said: i still think tracers should be fixed a little better.Mugsy_: What tweaks would you like to see?
Mugsy_
Tracers need to be Re-worked again?
09.03.2013 00:32:05
Subject: Tracers need to be Re-worked again?
Link on message: #3915942
DarkKaiser810, on Mar 08 2013 - 23:31, said: i still think tracers should be fixed a little better.
Link on message: #3915942
DarkKaiser810, on Mar 08 2013 - 23:31, said: i still think tracers should be fixed a little better.Mugsy_: What tweaks would you like to see?
Mugsy_
Tracers need to be Re-worked again?
09.03.2013 00:32:05
Subject: Tracers need to be Re-worked again?
Link on message: #3915942
DarkKaiser810, on Mar 08 2013 - 23:31, said: i still think tracers should be fixed a little better.
Link on message: #3915942
DarkKaiser810, on Mar 08 2013 - 23:31, said: i still think tracers should be fixed a little better.Mugsy_: What tweaks would you like to see?
Yoott
Clarification from WG
09.03.2013 00:26:28
Subject: Clarification from WG
Link on message: #3915889
GD_Landser, on Mar 08 2013 - 23:46, said: Welcome!
Link on message: #3915889
GD_Landser, on Mar 08 2013 - 23:46, said: Welcome!Yoott: LOL
GeneralDirection
Clarification from WG
08.03.2013 23:31:40
Subject: Clarification from WG
Link on message: #3915408
Link on message: #3915408
GeneralDirection: I'm having Minister of Propaganda delete that part of the article
completely, because it has nothing to do with the event and
shouldn't be in there. It makes things overly confusing when it
shouldn't be.
GeneralDirection
Clarification from WG
08.03.2013 23:31:40
Subject: Clarification from WG
Link on message: #3915408
Link on message: #3915408
GeneralDirection: I'm having Minister of Propaganda delete that part of the article
completely, because it has nothing to do with the event and
shouldn't be in there. It makes things overly confusing when it
shouldn't be.
GeneralDirection
Clarification from WG
08.03.2013 23:31:40
Subject: Clarification from WG
Link on message: #3915408
Link on message: #3915408
GeneralDirection: I'm having Minister of Propaganda delete that part of the article
completely, because it has nothing to do with the event and
shouldn't be in there. It makes things overly confusing when it
shouldn't be.
Major_Rampage
Junior TC's: what do you guys run?
08.03.2013 23:28:00
Subject: Junior TC's: what do you guys run?
Link on message: #3915374
Spanktankk, on Mar 08 2013 - 20:47, said: Just bought one. Cant wait to run it. Still
think my M3 Stuart at 400% crew skills will be my first choice
tho 
Link on message: #3915374
Spanktankk, on Mar 08 2013 - 20:47, said: Just bought one. Cant wait to run it. Still
think my M3 Stuart at 400% crew skills will be my first choice
tho Major_Rampage: I just retrained my 3 skill crew to Marder II for tongiht
Major_Rampage
Rampage's Ruckus: Junior Tank Company, March 8th
08.03.2013 23:26:56
Subject: Rampage's Ruckus: Junior Tank Company, March 8th
Link on message: #3915362
warrends, on Mar 08 2013 - 20:12, said: Um ... Major ... wanna rephrase that???
Link on message: #3915362
warrends, on Mar 08 2013 - 20:12, said: Um ... Major ... wanna rephrase that???Major_Rampage: Fixed! I guess I need more coffee and less Dayquill
GeneralDirection
Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
08.03.2013 23:23:42
Subject: Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
Link on message: #3915339
Aquavolt, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:25, said: Then why does it say Stage IV: Finale is on March 8th?
This needs some major clarification if the event was really ended on the 5th.
Link on message: #3915339
Aquavolt, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:25, said: Then why does it say Stage IV: Finale is on March 8th?This needs some major clarification if the event was really ended on the 5th.
GeneralDirection: The finale is that everything is back to tier 10. The actual reward
phase ended on the 5th.
GeneralDirection
Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
08.03.2013 23:23:42
Subject: Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
Link on message: #3915339
Aquavolt, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:25, said: Then why does it say Stage IV: Finale is on March 8th?
This needs some major clarification if the event was really ended on the 5th.
Link on message: #3915339
Aquavolt, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:25, said: Then why does it say Stage IV: Finale is on March 8th?This needs some major clarification if the event was really ended on the 5th.
GeneralDirection:
The finale is that everything is back to tier 10. The actual reward phase ended on the 5th.
The finale is that everything is back to tier 10. The actual reward phase ended on the 5th.
GeneralDirection
Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
08.03.2013 23:23:42
Subject: Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
Link on message: #3915339
Aquavolt, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:25, said: Then why does it say Stage IV: Finale is on March 8th?
This needs some major clarification if the event was really ended on the 5th.
Link on message: #3915339
Aquavolt, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:25, said: Then why does it say Stage IV: Finale is on March 8th?This needs some major clarification if the event was really ended on the 5th.
GeneralDirection:
The finale is that everything is back to tier 10. The actual reward phase ended on the 5th.
The finale is that everything is back to tier 10. The actual reward phase ended on the 5th.
GeneralDirection
Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
08.03.2013 23:22:42
Subject: Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
Link on message: #3915331
Siian, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:17, said: Okay! So if we loose tonight we still made the award prizes
correct?
Link on message: #3915331
Siian, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:17, said: Okay! So if we loose tonight we still made the award prizes
correct?GeneralDirection: Yes. I'll try to get an update on the status of rewards.
GeneralDirection
Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
08.03.2013 23:22:42
Subject: Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
Link on message: #3915331
Siian, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:17, said: Okay! So if we loose tonight we still made the award prizes
correct?
Link on message: #3915331
Siian, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:17, said: Okay! So if we loose tonight we still made the award prizes
correct?GeneralDirection:
Yes. I'll try to get an update on the status of rewards.
Yes. I'll try to get an update on the status of rewards.
GeneralDirection
Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
08.03.2013 23:22:42
Subject: Global Map Issue - March 8, 2013
Link on message: #3915331
Siian, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:17, said: Okay! So if we loose tonight we still made the award prizes
correct?
Link on message: #3915331
Siian, on Mar 08 2013 - 21:17, said: Okay! So if we loose tonight we still made the award prizes
correct?GeneralDirection:
Yes. I'll try to get an update on the status of rewards.
Yes. I'll try to get an update on the status of rewards.
Mugsy_
VK 2801
08.03.2013 23:22:21
Mugsy_
VK 2801
08.03.2013 23:22:21
Mugsy_
VK 2801
08.03.2013 23:22:21
Mugsy_
WOT screwed VK2801
08.03.2013 23:20:25
Subject: WOT screwed VK2801
Link on message: #3915306
Link on message: #3915306
Mugsy_: Thank you very much for your feedback, it is being noted but I have
to ask - being a person who only plays German tanks do you think it
is possible that you may be missing a broader perspective on the
subject?
Mugsy_
WOT screwed VK2801
08.03.2013 23:20:25
Subject: WOT screwed VK2801
Link on message: #3915306
Link on message: #3915306
Mugsy_: Thank you very much for your feedback, it is being noted but I have
to ask - being a person who only plays German tanks do you think it
is possible that you may be missing a broader perspective on the
subject?
Mugsy_
WOT screwed VK2801
08.03.2013 23:20:25
Subject: WOT screwed VK2801
Link on message: #3915306
Link on message: #3915306
Mugsy_: Thank you very much for your feedback, it is being noted but I have
to ask - being a person who only plays German tanks do you think it
is possible that you may be missing a broader perspective on the
subject?
Major_Rampage
Medium Mayhem Weekend
08.03.2013 23:18:29
Subject: Medium Mayhem Weekend
Link on message: #3915290
NobleWhale, on Mar 08 2013 - 17:25, said: You should have put Type 59 back in the gift store for this
event...
Link on message: #3915290
NobleWhale, on Mar 08 2013 - 17:25, said: You should have put Type 59 back in the gift store for this
event...Major_Rampage: I am pretty sure you know that we have an official thread about
this: http://forum.worldof...n-the-gift-shop
Mugsy_
A new game mode idea!
08.03.2013 23:15:18
Subject: A new game mode idea!
Link on message: #3915261
Link on message: #3915261
Mugsy_: I think there are two camps in our community, folks who want
various kinds of "games" and folks who want battles. I suspect that
this divide is formed by whether they are attracted to World of
Tanks more because of the subject matter or the gameplay. Growing
up a gamer nerd, more than a tank nerd, I gravitate towards those
"gamey" modes like capture the flag, kill the man with the ball,
king of the hill, and those staple modes. I think they are fun and
I don't have to justify that fun against the realism of combat
situations. But, for example, I sit right beside krazyone in the
office and he would probably totally disagree with my line of
thinking. So that divide in the community is also present in our
office.
That being said, if these additional game modes are optional and very well designed I don't see the harm, personally. I will keep building a case to implement, not necessarily all of those modes, but some variance along those lines.
That being said, if these additional game modes are optional and very well designed I don't see the harm, personally. I will keep building a case to implement, not necessarily all of those modes, but some variance along those lines.
Mugsy_
A new game mode idea!
08.03.2013 23:15:18
Subject: A new game mode idea!
Link on message: #3915261
Link on message: #3915261
Mugsy_: I think there are two camps in our community, folks who want
various kinds of "games" and folks who want battles. I suspect that
this divide is formed by whether they are attracted to World of
Tanks more because of the subject matter or the gameplay. Growing
up a gamer nerd, more than a tank nerd, I gravitate towards those
"gamey" modes like capture the flag, kill the man with the ball,
king of the hill, and those staple modes. I think they are fun and
I don't have to justify that fun against the realism of combat
situations. But, for example, I sit right beside krazyone in the
office and he would probably totally disagree with my line of
thinking. So that divide in the community is also present in our
office.
That being said, if these additional game modes are optional and very well designed I don't see the harm, personally. I will keep building a case to implement, not necessarily all of those modes, but some variance along those lines.
That being said, if these additional game modes are optional and very well designed I don't see the harm, personally. I will keep building a case to implement, not necessarily all of those modes, but some variance along those lines.
Mugsy_
A new game mode idea!
08.03.2013 23:15:18
Subject: A new game mode idea!
Link on message: #3915261
Link on message: #3915261
Mugsy_: I think there are two camps in our community, folks who want
various kinds of "games" and folks who want battles. I suspect that
this divide is formed by whether they are attracted to World of
Tanks more because of the subject matter or the gameplay. Growing
up a gamer nerd, more than a tank nerd, I gravitate towards those
"gamey" modes like capture the flag, kill the man with the ball,
king of the hill, and those staple modes. I think they are fun and
I don't have to justify that fun against the realism of combat
situations. But, for example, I sit right beside krazyone in the
office and he would probably totally disagree with my line of
thinking. So that divide in the community is also present in our
office.
That being said, if these additional game modes are optional and very well designed I don't see the harm, personally. I will keep building a case to implement, not necessarily all of those modes, but some variance along those lines.
That being said, if these additional game modes are optional and very well designed I don't see the harm, personally. I will keep building a case to implement, not necessarily all of those modes, but some variance along those lines.
Реклама | Adv