Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
ApolloArtemis
Concurso: La Carrera hacia el StuG IV (Misiones Personales)
02.02.2015 21:52:23
Subject: Concurso: La Carrera hacia el StuG IV (Misiones Personales)
Link on message: #8505204
Link on message: #8505204
ApolloArtemis: Dios mio....el 15 de febrero me parece una eternidad jaja.
Gracias a todos por estar activos y participando en el
concurso.
The_Chieftain
Springtime for T110 and the Americas
02.02.2015 21:07:39
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8505018
Link on message: #8505018
The_Chieftain: SS, I got it. You don't like Cutland, and he doesn't like you. But
I cannot help but wonder for two reasons if you should have posted
that in the Czech historian meeting article. 1) I am not convinced
that Pasholok is correct. 2) Even if he is, you have probably
caused Pasholok no small amount of trouble internally. "What are
you doing going about telling this leak site of our own internal
problems?" If nothing else, you may have forced him to cut back on
his information flow to you, but I know I'd have been pissed if
you'd pointed me out directly as the source of opinions like that.
[ETA: Unless he knew you were going to post it, I guess]
pizzastorm
Groundhog Day
02.02.2015 21:04:21
Subject: Groundhog Day
Link on message: #8505005
Taggeth, on Feb 02 2015 - 10:57, said: Pizza! Do I have this straight? If I win 2
battles in a row along with placing in the top ten, I will earn the
"groundhog token". This will allow me to have x2 experience
on the next tank I play? Or will it reset the x2 on all my
tanks for that day?
LostMyMarbles, on Feb 02 2015 - 10:56, said: So with that being said even if the 2x is not displayed on
the tank currently being played it will get 2x again only 1 more
time Pizzastorm ??????
Link on message: #8505005
Taggeth, on Feb 02 2015 - 10:57, said: Pizza! Do I have this straight? If I win 2
battles in a row along with placing in the top ten, I will earn the
"groundhog token". This will allow me to have x2 experience
on the next tank I play? Or will it reset the x2 on all my
tanks for that day?pizzastorm: You should get extra X2'son ALL your tanks
LostMyMarbles, on Feb 02 2015 - 10:56, said: So with that being said even if the 2x is not displayed on
the tank currently being played it will get 2x again only 1 more
time Pizzastorm ??????pizzastorm: Yes.
pizzastorm
Groundhog Day
02.02.2015 20:48:20
Subject: Groundhog Day
Link on message: #8504931
Telscher, on Feb 02 2015 - 08:07, said: Okay, I just reread the mission parameters. In WG's defense, it
does not say "repeatable". However, it does not say "not
repeatable", "once per tank" or anything like that. This really
should've been made more clear. It was disappointing to figure out
the hard way. Having worked in advertising, I can tell you this. If
you don't make things very clear, people will assume the best in
their favor.
Link on message: #8504931
Telscher, on Feb 02 2015 - 08:07, said: Okay, I just reread the mission parameters. In WG's defense, it
does not say "repeatable". However, it does not say "not
repeatable", "once per tank" or anything like that. This really
should've been made more clear. It was disappointing to figure out
the hard way. Having worked in advertising, I can tell you this. If
you don't make things very clear, people will assume the best in
their favor.pizzastorm: The article does say "Once per account". Earning the token
will automatically grant you a second set of X2's for your
vehicles.
ElPozoleOlmeca
Analisis de tanques (Propuesta)
02.02.2015 20:45:38
Subject: Analisis de tanques (Propuesta)
Link on message: #8504910
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.
Link on message: #8504910
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.ElPozoleOlmeca:
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.ElPozoleOlmeca: Me parece una super idea, cualquier contribución de jugadores
latinos es bienvenida.
PollotheDestroyer
Analisis de tanques (Propuesta)
02.02.2015 20:45:38
Subject: Analisis de tanques (Propuesta)
Link on message: #8504910
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.
Link on message: #8504910
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.PollotheDestroyer:
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.PollotheDestroyer: Me parece una super idea, cualquier contribución de jugadores
latinos es bienvenida.
ApolloArtemis
Analisis de tanques (Propuesta)
02.02.2015 20:45:38
Subject: Analisis de tanques (Propuesta)
Link on message: #8504910
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.
Link on message: #8504910
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.ApolloArtemis:
MegaMagner, on Jan 17 2015 - 12:10, said: Hola a todos,quisiera hacer una propuesta y va de hacer analisis de
tanques en el juego. Antes que nada ya se que Kufo ya los hace pero
tambien a mi me gustaria aportar mi granito de arena a los usuarios
y tratar de contribuir ,ademas de darle a los mas nuevos una
ayudita o a alguien que dude sobre algun tanque. Yo sere lo mas
objetivo posible,no me basare en experiencias personales para decir
si son buenos o malos, no hare comparativas con otros tanques
(aunque una ocasional podria aparecer) por estos motivos: 1 - Es
posible que no lo jugue,simplemente,aunque dije cosas sobre algunos
tanques que no jugue,lo hago basandome en videos,gameplays o la
propia wikia del wot. Para comparar tanques estoy seguro que es mas
que necesario probarlos a si que no me arriesgare. 2 -
Simplemente no creo que necesite ser comparado,ya que creo que cada
tanque se juega de manera individual y hasta lo creo innecesario,
se me haria algo ridiculo comparar un T 43 con un T34-1 ya
que,aunque ambos sirven para lo mismo por lo que tengo entendido,
el T43 es para rodear y dar problemas con su rapido cañon y el
chino es mas para pegarse a un rival y que solo tenga a tiro la
dura torreta. Pienso analizar tanques que utilice,jugue y
termine de desarrollar,ademas de haber tenido buenos resultados ya
que no pienso hacer el analisis de un tanque stock por obvios
motivos o de un tanque con el que me fue mal hace muuuucho tiempo
como el Stug 3,porque me fue mal no quiere decir que sea
malo,simplemente lo mio no funciono con ese tanque. Y quizas
tambien ponga un par de datos de introduccion tanto historicos
(seran fuentes fuera de WoT aunque hay casos en los que sera
dificil,ya si es inventado solo digo que es inventado) como dentro
del juego Sientanse libres de expresar su opinion acerca de
esto y que les pareceria esta idea.ApolloArtemis: Me parece una super idea, cualquier contribución de jugadores
latinos es bienvenida.
ElPozoleOlmeca
No veo los creditos,oro etc
02.02.2015 20:40:36
Subject: No veo los creditos,oro etc
Link on message: #8504893
Link on message: #8504893
ElPozoleOlmeca: Es error de mod, para ver los créditos, oro et. Tienes que quitar
los mods.
PollotheDestroyer
No veo los creditos,oro etc
02.02.2015 20:40:36
Subject: No veo los creditos,oro etc
Link on message: #8504893
Link on message: #8504893
PollotheDestroyer: Es error de mod, para ver los créditos, oro et. Tienes que quitar
los mods.
ApolloArtemis
No veo los creditos,oro etc
02.02.2015 20:40:36
Subject: No veo los creditos,oro etc
Link on message: #8504893
Link on message: #8504893
ApolloArtemis: Es error de mod, para ver los créditos, oro et. Tienes que quitar
los mods.
ElPozoleOlmeca
ERROR AL AGREGAR NUEVOS MIEMBROS
02.02.2015 20:39:23
Subject: ERROR AL AGREGAR NUEVOS MIEMBROS
Link on message: #8504886
Link on message: #8504886
ElPozoleOlmeca: Sigues con el problema?
PollotheDestroyer
ERROR AL AGREGAR NUEVOS MIEMBROS
02.02.2015 20:39:23
Subject: ERROR AL AGREGAR NUEVOS MIEMBROS
Link on message: #8504886
Link on message: #8504886
PollotheDestroyer: Sigues con el problema?
ApolloArtemis
ERROR AL AGREGAR NUEVOS MIEMBROS
02.02.2015 20:39:23
Subject: ERROR AL AGREGAR NUEVOS MIEMBROS
Link on message: #8504886
Link on message: #8504886
ApolloArtemis: Sigues con el problema?
pizzastorm
Minor Price Changes
02.02.2015 20:10:10
Subject: Minor Price Changes
Link on message: #8504758
Chrysblade, on Feb 01 2015 - 19:43, said: This is unfortunate. The price increase in the 100 is unwise. It
excludes those (like me) who pay with things like Karma Koin. We
only have 10 and 25 dollar cards, and I for one am CERTAINLY not
going to pay to get the 100 package if I have to significantly over
buy to afford it. 
Link on message: #8504758
Chrysblade, on Feb 01 2015 - 19:43, said: This is unfortunate. The price increase in the 100 is unwise. It
excludes those (like me) who pay with things like Karma Koin. We
only have 10 and 25 dollar cards, and I for one am CERTAINLY not
going to pay to get the 100 package if I have to significantly over
buy to afford it. pizzastorm: Looks like the price remained under $99.99.
pizzastorm
WoT Bowl 2015 Contest
02.02.2015 20:08:12
Subject: WoT Bowl 2015 Contest
Link on message: #8504749
madogthefirst, on Jan 31 2015 - 19:29, said: I would very much like that confirmed and where to see the leader
boards.
Link on message: #8504749
madogthefirst, on Jan 31 2015 - 19:29, said: I would very much like that confirmed and where to see the leader
boards.pizzastorm: No need to post anything. The leaderboards will be posted at
the end of the event.
Lert
Where Do I Get My HD?
02.02.2015 19:51:23
Subject: Where Do I Get My HD?
Link on message: #8504693
Link on message: #8504693
Lert: A separate download for textures was eventually decided against, to
save on bandwidth and traffic.
The_Chieftain
Please please please, for the love of gold and green. BUFF THE SUPER PERSHING...
02.02.2015 19:05:21
Subject: Please please please, for the love of gold and green. BUFF THE SUPER PERSHING...
Link on message: #8504495
LegioCI, on Jan 31 2015 - 05:32, said: It seems to me that there is far more evidence to support a
full inner sheet than a half-sheet. The Kessel photos I used
previously are a bit grainy, but in this photo
(similarly grainy, but much from a much closer PoV.) you
can definitely see the angles of the applique plates as well as the
point at the top of the glacis where the two plates meet (Top
right.) 
I appreciate you bringing
it to Minsk's attention, though- regardless of the armor angles,
having that second sheet of spaced armor along the top half of the
hull would give it a large amount of the medium-range durablity it
lost in the 8.6 rebalance. And given that the change was originally
done in the name of historical accuracy, it seems like such a
change would merely be finishing that job.
Link on message: #8504495
LegioCI, on Jan 31 2015 - 05:32, said: It seems to me that there is far more evidence to support a
full inner sheet than a half-sheet. The Kessel photos I used
previously are a bit grainy, but in this photo
(similarly grainy, but much from a much closer PoV.) you
can definitely see the angles of the applique plates as well as the
point at the top of the glacis where the two plates meet (Top
right.) I appreciate you bringing
it to Minsk's attention, though- regardless of the armor angles,
having that second sheet of spaced armor along the top half of the
hull would give it a large amount of the medium-range durablity it
lost in the 8.6 rebalance. And given that the change was originally
done in the name of historical accuracy, it seems like such a
change would merely be finishing that job.The_Chieftain: OK, I see it now. Oddly, the photos in Hunnicutt, for once,
seem worse than the ones online.
Lert
Am I screwed?
02.02.2015 19:03:48
Subject: Am I screwed?
Link on message: #8504485
rich73, on Feb 02 2015 - 00:58, said: Lol..calling you noob is just a hazing
Link on message: #8504485
rich73, on Feb 02 2015 - 00:58, said: Lol..calling you noob is just a hazingLert: When is this hazing supposed to stop? Because I've got like
45k games ... @OP: click the link in my sig
Lert
Cowards!
02.02.2015 19:02:17
Lert
Refund for Lowe or buff it
02.02.2015 18:46:14
Subject: Refund for Lowe or buff it
Link on message: #8504399
Whitebuster, on Feb 02 2015 - 16:40, said: That gun can't do anything on the weakspots of tier 10
heavies, except on the E-100 lower glacis when facing forward.
Link on message: #8504399
Whitebuster, on Feb 02 2015 - 16:40, said: That gun can't do anything on the weakspots of tier 10
heavies, except on the E-100 lower glacis when facing forward.Lert: It's a better gun than KT has, and vs the T34 the only thing
Lowe's gun is worse at is slightly less pen. Whenever I'm faced
with tier 10's in my Lowe (again, 3200+ battles in mine) it's not
the gun that lets me down.
AgentXIII
Customer Support referencing rules that don't exist.
02.02.2015 18:43:05
Subject: Customer Support referencing rules that don't exist.
Link on message: #8504383
Link on message: #8504383
AgentXIII: What can I say? This thread has feels. Due to privacy policy
I can't really go into specifics about the OP's issue, however I
did send you a PM, Nutrientibus, about your recent warning and the
rule that may/or may not exist in this link: http://forum.worldof...ks-forum-rules/
As for a wrong/bad link being sent to players, I'm a little
curious about this, maybe one of my CSR's is using an old link.
I'll address this with the team. This brings me to human error. Yea
that! Surprised me to discover that human error caused more flights
to go down throughout history than hijacks or mechanical failures
combined. So what CanadianGuitar said was right, if you feel you
may be a victim of human error, send us a penalty appeal and we'll
look into it. A two week old ticket you say though? Please
send me the ticket # in a PM, there is a possibility it has been
misplaced as we work from oldest to newest and I don't see any 14+
day old tickets. We are a little backed up over here in support
right now though and for this I apologize to everyone who is
awaiting assistance. We have been posting support news regarding
this delay
here: https://na.wargaming.net/support/News/NewsItem/View/324/customer-service---ticket-response-update
Sadly, Rules Violations and Penalty Appeals will have delayed
response times due to focus on other issues. When it comes
to enforcing rules based on our judgment, please keep in mind that
every privately owned business "reserves the right to refuse
service to anyone" however, many stores will simply post a sign
that says "no shirt, no shoes, no service" and what this really
means is that when you enter our place of business "we kindly ask
that you keep things classy, or we'll ask you to leave". We try to
be as fair as possible to every player, but as we're all human's we
sometimes have varying judgments on any given situation. That's
where an appeal process comes in and we take a close look at the
whole scenario. I will definitely take this whole forum
thread to my manager and use the information within to work on
improving our service. Thank you everyone for your feedback, and as
a throw back to Jewel Thief, "keep it classy kiddos"
AgentXIII
Customer Support referencing rules that don't exist.
02.02.2015 18:43:05
Subject: Customer Support referencing rules that don't exist.
Link on message: #8504383
Link on message: #8504383
AgentXIII: What can I say? This thread has feels. Due to privacy policy
I can't really go into specifics about the OP's issue, however I
did send you a PM, Nutrientibus, about your recent warning and the
rule that may/or may not exist in this link: http://forum.worldof...ks-forum-rules/
As for a wrong/bad link being sent to players, I'm a little
curious about this, maybe one of my CSR's is using an old link.
I'll address this with the team. This brings me to human error. Yea
that! Surprised me to discover that human error caused more flights
to go down throughout history than hijacks or mechanical failures
combined. So what CanadianGuitar said was right, if you feel you
may be a victim of human error, send us a penalty appeal and we'll
look into it. A two week old ticket you say though? Please
send me the ticket # in a PM, there is a possibility it has been
misplaced as we work from oldest to newest and I don't see any 14+
day old tickets. We are a little backed up over here in support
right now though and for this I apologize to everyone who is
awaiting assistance. We have been posting support news regarding
this delay here: https://na.wargaming...response-update
Sadly, Rules Violations and Penalty Appeals will have delayed
response times due to focus on other issues. When it comes
to enforcing rules based on our judgment, please keep in mind that
every privately owned business "reserves the right to refuse
service to anyone" however, many stores will simply post a sign
that says "no shirt, no shoes, no service" and what this really
means is that when you enter our place of business "we kindly ask
that you keep things classy, or we'll ask you to leave". We try to
be as fair as possible to every player, but as we're all human's we
sometimes have varying judgments on any given situation. That's
where an appeal process comes in and we take a close look at the
whole scenario. I will definitely take this whole forum
thread to my manager and use the information within to work on
improving our service. Thank you everyone for your feedback, and as
a throw back to Jewel Thief, "keep it classy kiddos"
Lert
Refund for Lowe or buff it
02.02.2015 18:38:24
Subject: Refund for Lowe or buff it
Link on message: #8504365
Yankee, on Feb 02 2015 - 16:37, said: It just needs pref matchmaking.
Whitebuster, on Feb 02 2015 - 16:37, said: I have read a lot of reviews and even all your guide posts
(very good job btw) before buying it. I do not expect it to be a
dominating tank that can crush all noobs, but simply a tank that
has an equal level of performance as other tier 8 premiums. I am
not even trying to compare the Lowe to regular tier 8 as I know
that that premiums are made to be inferior to regular tanks. To put
its accurate gun to use, you must first be in a good sniping
position, but with that low mobility, the battle is already over
when you get there. On paper, the Lowe seems to be fine, but I has
a bad combination of pros and cons that do not allow it to put its
good gun to use in most cases.
Link on message: #8504365
Yankee, on Feb 02 2015 - 16:37, said: It just needs pref matchmaking.Lert: With that gun?
Whitebuster, on Feb 02 2015 - 16:37, said: I have read a lot of reviews and even all your guide posts
(very good job btw) before buying it. I do not expect it to be a
dominating tank that can crush all noobs, but simply a tank that
has an equal level of performance as other tier 8 premiums. I am
not even trying to compare the Lowe to regular tier 8 as I know
that that premiums are made to be inferior to regular tanks. To put
its accurate gun to use, you must first be in a good sniping
position, but with that low mobility, the battle is already over
when you get there. On paper, the Lowe seems to be fine, but I has
a bad combination of pros and cons that do not allow it to put its
good gun to use in most cases.Lert: You don't have to convince me of Lowe's weaknesses - they
are many and I have 3200+ battles in mine. I just still think that
complaining that something is too slow despite knowing that it was
very slow, the slowest of the tier 8 premiums actually, and still
buying it is a bit - ... Well, nonconstructive. Lowe doesn't
just have a 'good' gun, it has a spectacular gun. A better gun than
the regular tier 8 german heavy tanks even, in accuracy and pen.
When the most important aspect of a tank is this good, the armor is
ok and yet the tank as a package is supposed to be worse than
regular tanks, something else needs to be very very bad. On
paper the lowe is fine. In performance, the lowe is ok too. On the
mark for earnings per battle, recently-ish buffed, global
performance levels are on the mark - sorry, I still don't agree
that lowe needs a buff. Could it use one? Would I like it if it got
one? Yeah, sure. But it doesn't really need it, imo.
Capitao_Desastre_
Melhoramentos na Latência
02.02.2015 18:32:52
Subject: Melhoramentos na Latência
Link on message: #8504341
RaoulKinch, on Feb 02 2015 - 15:52, said: Caro Desastre peço encarecidamente que troque o Aidna pelo Ainda,
Grato. hu3 hu3 
Sobre o trabalho da
talencia, eu realmente tenho notado uma melhora no ping, ainda mais
de madrugada quando consigo 120 de ping, não me perguntem como.
Link on message: #8504341
RaoulKinch, on Feb 02 2015 - 15:52, said: Caro Desastre peço encarecidamente que troque o Aidna pelo Ainda,
Grato. hu3 hu3 Sobre o trabalho da
talencia, eu realmente tenho notado uma melhora no ping, ainda mais
de madrugada quando consigo 120 de ping, não me perguntem como.
Capitao_Desastre_: Oops 
Corrigido 
Corrigido Lert
A New German Arty!
02.02.2015 18:31:06
Subject: A New German Arty!
Link on message: #8504334
DirtyMaus, on Feb 02 2015 - 15:57, said: Whatever real paper is these days.
Link on message: #8504334
DirtyMaus, on Feb 02 2015 - 15:57, said: Whatever real paper is these days.Lert: Something that was actually thought of and at least sketched
or discussed in official documents.
Lert
Refund for Lowe or buff it
02.02.2015 18:28:28
Subject: Refund for Lowe or buff it
Link on message: #8504314
Whitebuster, on Feb 02 2015 - 16:04, said: We payed 50$ for the tank, I believe that we deserve our
product to not be inferior in performance to everything else on the
battlefield.
Link on message: #8504314
Whitebuster, on Feb 02 2015 - 16:04, said: We payed 50$ for the tank, I believe that we deserve our
product to not be inferior in performance to everything else on the
battlefield.Lert: Then you are sorely mistaken. You paid $50 for a product,
while information about its performance is readily available
everywhere, easy to find for anyone with a functioning braincell.
Your inability to have realistic expectations is not the fault of
WG. Nor is your inability to make Lowe work. No, I'm not
arguing that it's a perfect tank. Just that whining about the
performance of something that is neither designed, promised nor
supposed to equal other reular tier 8's in performance is asinine
at best. It's a premium tank, it's supposed to be a good
crew trainer and a good money earner. Hundreds if not thousands of
posts have been written about its performance, dozens if not
hundreds of videos exist about its performance, and yet you bought
it somehow expecting a facerolling pwntank of noobcrushing.
Lowe has a fantastic gun. That means it has to surrender some armor
and mobility to remain balanced. But wait, it's a premium tank,
which are supposed to be worse than regular tech tree tanks. So it
sacrifices a bit more armor and mobility. But it retains good
hull-down and good sidescraping. And angled, the front hull armor
will bounce quite a bit as well. So what's your problem?
Lert
Need some help form the community please
02.02.2015 18:18:49
Subject: Need some help form the community please
Link on message: #8504265
rojo180, on Feb 02 2015 - 15:54, said:
Link on message: #8504265
rojo180, on Feb 02 2015 - 15:54, said: Lert: Lack of turret means lack of flexibility in many situations,
gun's performance at long range is lackluster, only the
superstructure is moderately well armored. JP2 is a very good
machine that on the surface of it checks all the boxes but upon
closer examination has many weaknesses. 215b is also quite a
good machine which on the surface checks his boxes, but the armor
is very situational with enormous, well known weak spots and while
the acceleration is good, the top speed is mediocre. Gun depression
is also lacking, and the rear-mounted turret very annoying,
requiring a certain level of skill to do well with. His
skill level combined with the OP and especially admitting that he
has over 10k games across 4 accounts sounds to me like OP wants a
tank that does all the work for him, instead of having the
capacity, skill and interest to adjust his playstyle to suit a
tank. There is no tank in this game in which OP is suddenly,
magically going to start owning face, yet it strikes me that that
is what he was looking for. Finally, he's not asking about a
single tank, but for a whole nation.
Lert
Death of Clan Member "the1lord1'
02.02.2015 18:12:51
Subject: Death of Clan Member "the1lord1'
Link on message: #8504236
Link on message: #8504236
Lert: I do not know the person in question, but I know what the loss of a
friend is like. You have my sympathies.
Lert
Unreal Engine 4 tech demo
02.02.2015 17:30:05
Subject: Unreal Engine 4 tech demo
Link on message: #8504015
Tytoo, on Feb 02 2015 - 15:19, said: To be honest, i'm skeptical that it will look nearly as
good as it is in the SS.
Link on message: #8504015
Tytoo, on Feb 02 2015 - 15:19, said: To be honest, i'm skeptical that it will look nearly as
good as it is in the SS.Lert: It looks better. No JPG compression.
Capitao_Desastre_
Melhoramentos na Latência
02.02.2015 17:28:46
Subject: Melhoramentos na Latência
Link on message: #8504010
Link on message: #8504010
Capitao_Desastre_: Durante o último ano nos focámos em evoluir nossa infraestrutura na
Wargaming para melhor apoiar como um todo as Américas com os nossos
serviços. Isto inclui a latência, assunto sobre o qual começámos a
pesquisar no início de 2014. Enquanto este é e vai
continuar a ser um processo com vários passos, com várias variáveis
e parceiros envolvidos, no dia 26 de Janeiro colocámos em ação a
primeira de algumas mudanças que pretendemos fazer. Estas mudanças
foram pensadas para otimizar a latência e a qualidade de ligação,
reduzindo o ping e a perda de pacotes. A primeira mudança
está relacionada com a otimização de portas dentro da América do
Sul, que pelos resultados iniciais reduziu o ping em 10-20%
para alguns jogadores na Argentina e no Chile. Ainda estamos
recolhendo dados e analizando os resultados para outros países, mas
por agora o primeiro passo nos deu bons sinais. Estamos trabalhando
com vários ISPs neste projeto, e apenas um deles tem a nova
porta otimizada ativa, logo nem todos os jogadores verão resultados
imediatamente. Outras mudanças no futuro irão incluir
otimização de rota entre a América do Sul e a Flórida, bem como
otimização entre a Flórida e nossos servidores na Califórnia
e Washington, D.C.
Uma última nota: peço a todos que se mantenham atentos às condições de suas ligações. No caso de as coisas não estarem evoluindo como todos queremos (i.e., latência baixando), lhes pedia que abrissem um bilhete junto de nosso apoio, de forma a podermos identificar melhor as áreas que necessitam otimização.
Saudações
Uma última nota: peço a todos que se mantenham atentos às condições de suas ligações. No caso de as coisas não estarem evoluindo como todos queremos (i.e., latência baixando), lhes pedia que abrissem um bilhete junto de nosso apoio, de forma a podermos identificar melhor as áreas que necessitam otimização.
Saudações
Lert
Need some help form the community please
02.02.2015 17:13:58
Subject: Need some help form the community please
Link on message: #8503957
Link on message: #8503957
Lert: That tank you want does not exist. There is no one tank or nation
that has what you highlighted, a tank that scores high on all three
main attributes: mobility, armor, firepower. For every tank that
someone might suggest has all those attributes I can tell you why
it doesn't really. If after 10k games combined across 4
accounts (Which is breaking TOS btw, why 4 accounts? Why not just
stick with one) you still haven't found the right tank line for
you, maybe it's time you start to understand that 'the perfect
tank' does not exist. Nation-specific playstyles do not exist.
Every tier, every type, every class, every nation of
vehicles is different. Playstyles differ from tier to tier. For
example, french tanks are fast, soft and have autoloaders, right?
Yeah, tell that to the AMX 40. Japanese tanks have no armor and
snipey guns, right? Yeah, tell that to the STB-1. Adjust
your expectations to the vehicles in the game, instead of trying to
find a non-existing holy grail. After that, all I can
recommend is russian heavies. They seem to be pretty noob-friendly.
Lert
Unreal Engine 4 tech demo
02.02.2015 17:02:43
Subject: Unreal Engine 4 tech demo
Link on message: #8503907
MajorRenegade, on Feb 02 2015 - 14:59, said: i can't even tell that is running with game engine or not
A_UselessReptile, on Feb 02 2015 - 14:58, said: So this is what professional optimization for a massive game can
and should look like
Link on message: #8503907
MajorRenegade, on Feb 02 2015 - 14:59, said: i can't even tell that is running with game engine or notLert: It is. The lighting on reflective surfaces gives away that
it's realtime and not pre-rendered.
A_UselessReptile, on Feb 02 2015 - 14:58, said: So this is what professional optimization for a massive game can
and should look likeLert: Do keep in mind that this is a relatively low-poly, small
and static environment. Any game on UE4 won't look nearly as good
as this tech demo.
Lert
This is why I don't get the emphasis on Win Rate
02.02.2015 17:01:49
Subject: This is why I don't get the emphasis on Win Rate
Link on message: #8503901
Canadian_Reaper, on Jan 31 2015 - 20:42, said: Means nothing really.
Link on message: #8503901
Canadian_Reaper, on Jan 31 2015 - 20:42, said: Means nothing really.Lert: You really don't understand statistics, do you? Let
me put it this way: if I buy a new tank and lose my first battle in
it, then look at my WR, it'll be 0%. So apparently, according to
you since sample size means nothing, this means that it's the
absolute most terrible tank ever, right? Sample size is
everything. Even 100 matches is not really enough. At that level
any one match won or lost will still mean a whole % up or down. But
between 50 and 100 matches, trends start to become apparent.
Lert
FCM50T Vs AMX CDC Which do your prefer?
02.02.2015 16:52:51
Subject: FCM50T Vs AMX CDC Which do your prefer?
Link on message: #8503862
KaiserMartens, on Feb 02 2015 - 13:45, said: CDC is just the non premium MM replacement for FCM, as they are
going to phase out all the premium MM vehicles with such
replacements.
Link on message: #8503862
KaiserMartens, on Feb 02 2015 - 13:45, said: CDC is just the non premium MM replacement for FCM, as they are
going to phase out all the premium MM vehicles with such
replacements.Lert: Do you even know what 'replacement' means? Or do you have
special insider information about WG plans to remove the 50t? Also,
how does a premium medium replace a premium heavy?
Lert
How to end a bad streak?!
02.02.2015 16:50:16
Subject: How to end a bad streak?!
Link on message: #8503848
Harkonen_siegetank, on Feb 02 2015 - 14:46, said: I'm sorry but do you even read his post?
Link on message: #8503848
Harkonen_siegetank, on Feb 02 2015 - 14:46, said: I'm sorry but do you even read his post?Lert: Yes. He returned still annoyed and forced himself to keep
playing, and is now asking for tips on ending the slump. Did you
even read my reply?
Lert
How to end a bad streak?!
02.02.2015 16:43:06
Subject: How to end a bad streak?!
Link on message: #8503813
Link on message: #8503813
Lert: Stop trying to force yourself. Take a break. Take a walk. Eat
something. Play something else. Get un-annoyed. Try again
refreshed. What, you expected a golden 'do this simple thing
to start winning more' tip? Yeah, if such a tip existed, it
wouldn't be secret.
Lert
Unreal Engine 4 tech demo
02.02.2015 16:38:43
Subject: Unreal Engine 4 tech demo
Link on message: #8503791
Link on message: #8503791
Lert: Screenshots: 
Download
here. I'm amazed at how well optimized this engine is.
My system is mediocre at best with a 7 year old CPU and a 3 year
old mid-range graphics card, just not quite capable of running WoT
fluid at full settings, but this never dipped below 50 fps running
the tech demo at standard resolution. My system: E8600 core
2 duo 8 GB DDR2 GTX 660 2gb Disclaimer for the WoT forum
moderators: This post is not advertising other games. This post is
not selling a product. This post is not discussing another game.
This post is for informative purposes, relevant to all gamers. It
is a post showcasing new technology in realtime 3D rendering. This
post does not break forum rules. Disclaimer for anyone who
is planning to post something akin to "Why can't WoT run this fluid
if this can on my system"? This tech demo uses a state-of-the-art
DX11 graphics engine to render an environment that consists solely
of static objects, which are easier to render than dynamic ones.
WoT uses an ancient engine that was second-rate and cheap 6 ears
ago, and is a highly dynamic environment.
Download
here. I'm amazed at how well optimized this engine is.
My system is mediocre at best with a 7 year old CPU and a 3 year
old mid-range graphics card, just not quite capable of running WoT
fluid at full settings, but this never dipped below 50 fps running
the tech demo at standard resolution. My system: E8600 core
2 duo 8 GB DDR2 GTX 660 2gb Disclaimer for the WoT forum
moderators: This post is not advertising other games. This post is
not selling a product. This post is not discussing another game.
This post is for informative purposes, relevant to all gamers. It
is a post showcasing new technology in realtime 3D rendering. This
post does not break forum rules. Disclaimer for anyone who
is planning to post something akin to "Why can't WoT run this fluid
if this can on my system"? This tech demo uses a state-of-the-art
DX11 graphics engine to render an environment that consists solely
of static objects, which are easier to render than dynamic ones.
WoT uses an ancient engine that was second-rate and cheap 6 ears
ago, and is a highly dynamic environment.pizzastorm
Race to the StuG IV - Personal Missions Contest
02.02.2015 08:48:47
Subject: Race to the StuG IV - Personal Missions Contest
Link on message: #8503087
Link on message: #8503087
pizzastorm: Surprised at the amount of people who have completed this already!
14 more days until this contest ends!
pizzastorm
PAX Your Bags – Win a Trip to PAX East 2015!
02.02.2015 08:46:21
Subject: PAX Your Bags – Win a Trip to PAX East 2015!
Link on message: #8503082
Link on message: #8503082
pizzastorm: Thank you for all the entries! We will be looking at them all this
week.
pizzastorm
Locking up the garage and coming back to old grounds
02.02.2015 08:44:47
Subject: Locking up the garage and coming back to old grounds
Link on message: #8503078
Link on message: #8503078
pizzastorm: Welcome back!
Реклама | Adv