Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Kudos to WGNA for Helpful Sale Announcements
Link on message: #10718991
Link on message: #10718991
Sea_Star: Hey guys, thanks for the feedback! Our publication schedule for
February is already set, but we're going to try to make some
adjustments for March based on what we're you hearing you like.

Subject: Map Exhibition - Sand River
Link on message: #10718496
Link on message: #10718496
dance210: Group Stage Day 1 Standings *Standings final after both Group Stage
days Rank Team title Points Earned Points Possible Points
Ratio 1 NEWBI 18 18 1.000 1 Romantic Bulbasaurs 18 18 1.000 1
Guerrillas 18 18 1.000 1 Church of Iron 18 18 1.000 1
They_Say_Y0L0_Hax 18 18 1.000 1 TEMPLE KNIGHTS 18 18 1.000 7 -4K-
16 18 0.889 8 HavoK 15 18 0.833 8 -Hero 15 18 0.833 8 Rel2 15 18
0.833 8 比格噶德 carry us flyfly 15 18 0.833 8 RELIC'FU 15 18
0.833 8 -404- Reform Not-F 15 18 0.833 14 ROXY 13 18 0.722 15 MAHOU
12 18 0.667 15 CUBE 12 18 0.667 15 SNEKS 12 18 0.667 15 FADED 12 18
0.667 15 Furious Fusion 12 18 0.667 15 I_luv_showing_my 12 18 0.667
15 Wolverines 12 18 0.667 22 WHY NOT!!! 9 18 0.500 22 T-F-Z Troll
Hunters 9 18 0.500 22 AntonOryxKampers 9 18 0.500 22 -DIG- 9 18
0.500 22 1-4-ALL 9 18 0.500 22 Mancos al combate 9 18 0.500 22
RedSky 9 18 0.500 29 _FAM_ 6 18 0.333 29 PZLD latinos 6 18 0.333 29
11th ACR, Battle Grp 6 18 0.333 29 R0GU3 6 18 0.333 29 wolfgirls go
awoo 6 18 0.333 29 OSÓRIO 6 18 0.333 29 hiway 6 18 0.333 29 HULK 6
18 0.333 37 -TAO- 3 18 0.167 37 War Time 3 18 0.167 37 ROCKY 3 18
0.167 37 Phoenix-Brothers 3 18 0.167 37 Fal-X 3 18 0.167 37 M-M-E 3
18 0.167 43 RO-TD 0 18 0.000 43 Live Master Taco o// 0 18 0.000 43
Lost Legion 0 18 0.000 43 FELONZ 0 18 0.000 43 ***C H I L E*** 0 18
0.000 43 MCRD 0 18 0.000 43 cartel1 0 18 0.000
Subject: The M-3 Grant
Link on message: #10717117
Da_Craw, on Jan 23 2017 - 16:23, said: The irony is that the 75 on the Lee/Grant was not intended as an
anti-tank weapon. That was what the 37 in the turret was for.
Link on message: #10717117
Da_Craw, on Jan 23 2017 - 16:23, said: The irony is that the 75 on the Lee/Grant was not intended as an
anti-tank weapon. That was what the 37 in the turret was for.The_Chieftain: I don't believe that is the case. The only documentation I
have thus far seen on the matter indicates that the desire for the
75mm came from the issues that the smaller guns were demonstrating
in the fall of France, and that the 37mm was retained at the
specific request of Infantry branch, presumably because of the
ability for all-around fire with a canister round to protect the
tank against any sneaky infantry types.
Subject: Just in a game with MeatheadMilitia
Link on message: #10717109
Link on message: #10717109
The_Chieftain: We generally play on West, because our office is on the West Coast,
in California.
Subject: What's your go-to tank when you are having a bad day in WoT?
Link on message: #10717106
Link on message: #10717106
The_Chieftain: Churchill III or M103. My two highest win-rate tanks.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10717064
Link on message: #10717064
The_Chieftain: OK, we're going to relocate, but we will be re-born, sortof. My
guess is that the lock-and-renew will happen Monday. Exact details
still to be hammered out.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10716682
Tjtod, on Jan 25 2017 - 20:48, said: The last bit of historical reading I did was on the development of
USN and IJN carrier task forces in WWII
Link on message: #10716682
Tjtod, on Jan 25 2017 - 20:48, said: The last bit of historical reading I did was on the development of
USN and IJN carrier task forces in WWIIThe_Chieftain: That actually sounds like interesting light entertainment.
Link? (Or is it one of those old-fashioned mashed tree thingies?)
Subject: Weekly 5v5 - Questions and Answers
Link on message: #10716358
scarybolts, on Jan 23 2017 - 14:32, said: Why are some teams listed as having more than the 7 allowable
members I was under the impression it was 5 soldiers and 2
reserves?
porkchop39, on Jan 24 2017 - 16:27, said: Payouts? I already got paid for the 1v1, which concluded after this
tourney.
AnonymousHippopotamus, on Jan 25 2017 - 10:56, said: What happens if you get a draw in the playoffs? Auto loss or?
Link on message: #10716358
scarybolts, on Jan 23 2017 - 14:32, said: Why are some teams listed as having more than the 7 allowable
members I was under the impression it was 5 soldiers and 2
reserves?dance210: Are you seeing more than 7 players on GosuTactics? If so, it
seems to pull data from members who may have left the team before
registration closed. When you check their actual team page, a max
of 7 players are on the team.
porkchop39, on Jan 24 2017 - 16:27, said: Payouts? I already got paid for the 1v1, which concluded after this
tourney.dance210: Should be going out this afternoon
AnonymousHippopotamus, on Jan 25 2017 - 10:56, said: What happens if you get a draw in the playoffs? Auto loss or?dance210: If neither team earns a victory, then both are eliminated
and don't move on to the next round.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10716162
RitaGamer, on Jan 24 2017 - 19:58, said: JayStark is watching us 
EmpressNero, on Jan 24 2017 - 20:37, said: I forget, has George R. R. Martin killed off Jay Stark yet?
Link on message: #10716162
RitaGamer, on Jan 24 2017 - 19:58, said: JayStark is watching us 
JayStark02:
EmpressNero, on Jan 24 2017 - 20:37, said: I forget, has George R. R. Martin killed off Jay Stark yet?
JayStark02: The Starks send their regards... Oh wait...
Subject: Where to buy
Link on message: #10716084
Captain_Obvious65, on Jan 25 2017 - 07:06, said: Is there any real difference between buying premium tanks in game
versus the premium shop on the website? The only thing I see
is some go on sale with extras on site. Is that the only
difference?
Link on message: #10716084
Captain_Obvious65, on Jan 25 2017 - 07:06, said: Is there any real difference between buying premium tanks in game
versus the premium shop on the website? The only thing I see
is some go on sale with extras on site. Is that the only
difference? GhostPrime: Hello and Welcome to World of Tanks! Premium
tanks in our premium shop are often bundled with Premium time and
other in game items. Also, some tanks in the Premium shop are
not available for purchase in the tech tree. We do have sales now
and again, so that's a factor to think about as well.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10716032
Link on message: #10716032
The_Chieftain: The thread was due for closure soon anyway because of size, and I
think will be closed by Monday. If a successor re-opens
(Goldmountain, you did not do us any favors with that image:
Moderators are still moderators, and Ghostprime isn't a moderator
either), it will likely be on the Hatch subforum. More to follow.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10713988
KilljoyCutter, on Jan 24 2017 - 11:36, said: A gentleman as always. Thank you.
Link on message: #10713988
KilljoyCutter, on Jan 24 2017 - 11:36, said: A gentleman as always. Thank you.GhostPrime: I would appreciate everyone keeping the thread on
topic. Political discussions are not allowed on the
forums.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10713908
KilljoyCutter, on Jan 24 2017 - 12:31, said: Chief -- the drive-by who deleted posts is now going back
and deleting more of them, and issuing warnings. I got
nailed for one of my posts about The Donald. My guess is
that our recent threadcrapping spamposter got salty and reported a
bunch of posts.
Link on message: #10713908
KilljoyCutter, on Jan 24 2017 - 12:31, said: Chief -- the drive-by who deleted posts is now going back
and deleting more of them, and issuing warnings. I got
nailed for one of my posts about The Donald. My guess is
that our recent threadcrapping spamposter got salty and reported a
bunch of posts. The_Chieftain: OK, I looked up your moderation history, and sent the
moderator a request to go easy on hitting folks for subject matter.
Subject: A Relative Newcomer's Take on WoT
Link on message: #10713815
ComradeRed13113, on Jan 24 2017 - 02:12, said: I don't see the grind as one of the main mechanics of
the game. The main point of the game is to fight tank battles
with a wide variety of tanks, TDs and self-propelled artillery in a
competitive multiplayer environment. Everything else should
be in support of making these battles as fun and interesting as
possible. I like the mechanics of the battles
themselves and don't think they need any simplification to
appeal to a wider audience. My friends and I have tried to
get into this game multiple times since 2011, and we have a lot of
fun for a few hours until matchmaking renders the game too
frustrating to play due to being undertiered in about half of the
matches. You say I need to learn how to play the game, and I
certainly do, but it gets really frustrating to try to fight better
players who by the way also have better tanks. The grind
itself adds absolutely no difficulty or detail to the game, it just
requires players to spend more time and money to unlock content.
If Everquest one day just made it take 5x as much experience
to get to the next level, does that add difficulty or detail to the
game? No, it doesn't. It just makes the game more
tedious and poorly paced. I used to play Counter-Strike back
in my college days and that was a difficult game to get good at,
all with absolutely no grinding or inherent inbalances between
players with the exception of skill. They didn't force me to
use a pistol for 200 battles until I could unlock a weak SMG while
in the meantime going up against people with AK-47s and sniper
rifles. In the end though, the grind wouldn't be a major
problem or a grind at all if matchmaking was tightened up to reduce
the disparity between tanks in a given match. The battles are
fun when I can fight on even footing with other tanks of my class.
There's nothing wrong with a light tank not being able to go
up against a heavy, but there is something wrong when a medium tank
stands absolutely no chance another medium tank in the same
battle due to tier differences. I want to learn the game and
get better, but it's tough to learn when I don't know if I died
because I was positioned poorly, or because it simply takes much
more effort for me to kill my enemy than it takes for him to
kill me. Honestly, WoT probably has less
content than an average $60 game. Not everyone wants to
play the same game for years. If Wargaming only wants diehard
players as a part of their player base by making the game
inaccessible to casual players, that's their choice. I'm
still going to play this game because I love the concept, it would
just be nice to be able to get some of friends to play and stick
with it as well. Also, don't you think the fact that you've
played the game this long and still haven't unlocked all the
content is bit... ridiculous?
Link on message: #10713815
ComradeRed13113, on Jan 24 2017 - 02:12, said: I don't see the grind as one of the main mechanics of
the game. The main point of the game is to fight tank battles
with a wide variety of tanks, TDs and self-propelled artillery in a
competitive multiplayer environment. Everything else should
be in support of making these battles as fun and interesting as
possible. I like the mechanics of the battles
themselves and don't think they need any simplification to
appeal to a wider audience. My friends and I have tried to
get into this game multiple times since 2011, and we have a lot of
fun for a few hours until matchmaking renders the game too
frustrating to play due to being undertiered in about half of the
matches. You say I need to learn how to play the game, and I
certainly do, but it gets really frustrating to try to fight better
players who by the way also have better tanks. The grind
itself adds absolutely no difficulty or detail to the game, it just
requires players to spend more time and money to unlock content.
If Everquest one day just made it take 5x as much experience
to get to the next level, does that add difficulty or detail to the
game? No, it doesn't. It just makes the game more
tedious and poorly paced. I used to play Counter-Strike back
in my college days and that was a difficult game to get good at,
all with absolutely no grinding or inherent inbalances between
players with the exception of skill. They didn't force me to
use a pistol for 200 battles until I could unlock a weak SMG while
in the meantime going up against people with AK-47s and sniper
rifles. In the end though, the grind wouldn't be a major
problem or a grind at all if matchmaking was tightened up to reduce
the disparity between tanks in a given match. The battles are
fun when I can fight on even footing with other tanks of my class.
There's nothing wrong with a light tank not being able to go
up against a heavy, but there is something wrong when a medium tank
stands absolutely no chance another medium tank in the same
battle due to tier differences. I want to learn the game and
get better, but it's tough to learn when I don't know if I died
because I was positioned poorly, or because it simply takes much
more effort for me to kill my enemy than it takes for him to
kill me. Honestly, WoT probably has less
content than an average $60 game. Not everyone wants to
play the same game for years. If Wargaming only wants diehard
players as a part of their player base by making the game
inaccessible to casual players, that's their choice. I'm
still going to play this game because I love the concept, it would
just be nice to be able to get some of friends to play and stick
with it as well. Also, don't you think the fact that you've
played the game this long and still haven't unlocked all the
content is bit... ridiculous? GhostPrime: Thank you for your honesty about your feelings for the game
at this point. I do think you hit on some interesting points new
players face. The game does have a learning curve to it, and as
most will here mention it takes knowledge and some patience to get
the hang of the game, know its mechanics, and how to be successful.
If you so choose there are a lot of very handy player guides pinned
in this and the "Game guides and Tutorials" section of the
forums that may help you on the way. I wish you all the luck on the
battlefield, and hope to see you out there in battle.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10712498
Link on message: #10712498
The_Chieftain: If any posts have hidden, I am not responsible for them this time.
Subject: World of Tanks Update 0.9.17_5
Link on message: #10711452
Link on message: #10711452
GhostPrime: Attention Tankers!There are plans to release Micropatch
9.17_5 on January 24th, 2016Maintenance will begin
at 01:00 Pacific Time (09:00 UTC) and will last
approximately one hour.During maintenance, the World of Tanks
servers will be unavailable.Patch note:Fixed some technical issues.
Subject: how is wargaming ok with things like this?
Link on message: #10711322
AshMatrix, on Jan 23 2017 - 09:37, said: http://worldoftanks....eam/1000219294/
its one thing to see this in chat, there isn't much that can
be done in that case. but really wargaming? a team name for a
tournament? do you not know how to set up a naming filter? or are
you ok with this?
Link on message: #10711322
AshMatrix, on Jan 23 2017 - 09:37, said: http://worldoftanks....eam/1000219294/
its one thing to see this in chat, there isn't much that can
be done in that case. but really wargaming? a team name for a
tournament? do you not know how to set up a naming filter? or are
you ok with this?dance210: Hi! Unfortunately, our tournament system does not
automatically edit team names. When registration closes, I manually
check the team names and change/disqualify teams as needed.
Unfortunately, this check is only done once - after registration
closes. If you happen to see any names that break any of our
posted rules, please send an email to
tournaments@wargamingamerica.com with a link to the team.
Please do not submit a Support ticket to get the team
name changed; they will most likely refer you back to the
tournament email so that we can take care of it. Thanks.
Subject: Personalized Inscriptions
Link on message: #10710429
Link on message: #10710429
Mezurashi: Just a friendly reminder. It's fine to disagree with other player's
opinions, but please keep it civil. Thanks.
Subject: REMOVE ARTILLERY
Link on message: #10710403
Link on message: #10710403
Mezurashi: Topic is locked.
There's already a similar topic here: http://forum.worldof...necessary-evil/
There's already a similar topic here: http://forum.worldof...necessary-evil/
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10709975
Link on message: #10709975
The_Chieftain: It got pulled out pretty quickly, with the aid of 2x M88.
Subject: The proper way to handle the ELC amx. ( clip )
Link on message: #10709725
Link on message: #10709725
Mezurashi: Hello guys, just reminding people that just because they don't like
what they see in a post, doesn't mean they have every right to
derail the topic. Please treat each other with respect.
Thanks.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10709492
Link on message: #10709492
The_Chieftain: Disruptive posting is, actually a violation of ToS, and I'm
starting to get a little tired of it. You are warned.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10709424
Link on message: #10709424
The_Chieftain: The Powers-that-are decided that SS had strayed too far into
proselyting for the opposition. I couldn't save him.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10708409
Blackhorse_Three_, on Jan 21 2017 - 09:44, said: Interesting model gaff
Link on message: #10708409
Blackhorse_Three_, on Jan 21 2017 - 09:44, said: Interesting model gaffThe_Chieftain: good catch
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10708408
Blackhorse_Three_, on Jan 21 2017 - 09:44, said: Interesting model gaff
Link on message: #10708408
Blackhorse_Three_, on Jan 21 2017 - 09:44, said: Interesting model gaffThe_Chieftain: good catch
Subject: January Stream Raid! - Jan. 21
Link on message: #10705658
LostMyMarbles, on Jan 19 2017 - 18:49, said: Is this on both USwest and US east or Both Plz
advise thanks Dance210
Link on message: #10705658
LostMyMarbles, on Jan 19 2017 - 18:49, said: Is this on both USwest and US east or Both Plz
advise thanks Dance210dance210: We'll be searching for people using Twitch, so it shouldn't
matter which server you play on 
Subject: Sandbox ideas will give WOT even more crap gameplay.
Link on message: #10705615
Link on message: #10705615
JayStark02: Okay guys, I've removed off-topic posts on this thread. If you have
proof of your claims, submit a ticket and our Customer Support
will conduct an investigation. Please stay on topic and
refrain from being rude to one another.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10705254
Link on message: #10705254
The_Chieftain: Well, in fairness, the V-22 was not exactly trouble-free to begin
with either. Seems to be doing OK now though.
Subject: Wargaming Game Center Important Information
Link on message: #10705086
diditforthelolz, on Jan 19 2017 - 19:02, said: I got the email and tried to download the launcher. I'm getting a
404 error. Any suggestions?
Link on message: #10705086
diditforthelolz, on Jan 19 2017 - 19:02, said: I got the email and tried to download the launcher. I'm getting a
404 error. Any suggestions?GhostPrime: I have updated the OP in this thread with a link to download
the launcher. I apologize for the inconvenience, and you can
download the Launcher HERE as well.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10704216
Link on message: #10704216
The_Chieftain: Awww... No more Unicum guides
Won't be a K-tank. If the
draft gets approved as I've seen it, it actually will be a
reasonable bonus code, though.
Subject: WG- fair play policy
Link on message: #10704128
Link on message: #10704128
Volier_Zcit: Thread closed for being nonconstructive and full of unnecessary
arguments.
Subject: Thanks WG
Link on message: #10703575
pepsigamer02_2, on Jan 19 2017 - 17:23, said: Every time i see a WoT related online discussion i always see at
least one nasty, inappropriate, negative or genuinely
offensive comment leveled at you guys and its regularly more than
1/2 the comments in said discussion and I know from personal
experience how hard this make your job, i want this thread to try
to break the "WG hate" trend i see in so many places, so please
community try to at least keep it constructive criticism in this
thread. I would like to take this time to thank the WG team
for World of tanks. World of tanks is a great game i love to
play and have fun with my friends. To battle is out with historic
(and not so historic looking at you WT E-100) tanks is a
blast. The WG team has realy been making an effort to make
this game better with the UI improvements, spoting update, constant
optimizations, new tanks/tank trees, and graphical
improvements. So thank you WG for puting up with the impulsive
negative internet bull-crap thrown at you and please keep up the
good work. Good luck in your (and our, the
community's) battles with the unholy trinity of Maps,
Matchmaker, and Arty. And good luck with the lesser battles of
balance premium rounds and mods/cheating. -pepsigamer
Link on message: #10703575
pepsigamer02_2, on Jan 19 2017 - 17:23, said: Every time i see a WoT related online discussion i always see at
least one nasty, inappropriate, negative or genuinely
offensive comment leveled at you guys and its regularly more than
1/2 the comments in said discussion and I know from personal
experience how hard this make your job, i want this thread to try
to break the "WG hate" trend i see in so many places, so please
community try to at least keep it constructive criticism in this
thread. I would like to take this time to thank the WG team
for World of tanks. World of tanks is a great game i love to
play and have fun with my friends. To battle is out with historic
(and not so historic looking at you WT E-100) tanks is a
blast. The WG team has realy been making an effort to make
this game better with the UI improvements, spoting update, constant
optimizations, new tanks/tank trees, and graphical
improvements. So thank you WG for puting up with the impulsive
negative internet bull-crap thrown at you and please keep up the
good work. Good luck in your (and our, the
community's) battles with the unholy trinity of Maps,
Matchmaker, and Arty. And good luck with the lesser battles of
balance premium rounds and mods/cheating. -pepsigamerGhostPrime: Thank you for the kind words!
This community is a passionate group
of people and I am proud to be a part of it. We are always looking
to improve and help the community, and the game. You are Most
welcome!
Subject: New player here
Link on message: #10703568
12B4X, on Jan 19 2017 - 17:15, said: Scorpiany has some nice guides. Also Lert has some great ones...
http://forum.worldof...tion-of-guides/
Welcome and have fun.
Link on message: #10703568
12B4X, on Jan 19 2017 - 17:15, said: Scorpiany has some nice guides. Also Lert has some great ones...
http://forum.worldof...tion-of-guides/
Welcome and have fun.GhostPrime: Welcome to World of Tanks and the World of Tanks
forums! These are some good guides, as are a lot of the ones
in the guides forum.
Subject: :( Disagreements With New Sandbox Changes
Link on message: #10703117
Link on message: #10703117
GhostPrime: Please feel free to discuss this topic. I'm moving this to the
sandbox section.
Subject: Sandbox Server's Second Iteration Begins
Link on message: #10702892
Link on message: #10702892
GhostPrime: Hello tankers, The time for Sandbox is upon us once
again! Please see the article with the link to the Sandbox
Blog HERE. We do ask that you please keep your
discussions to this thread and the Sandbox section of the forums.
Subject: One more day !
Link on message: #10702637
Link on message: #10702637
JayStark02: Alright guys, I'm closing this thread before it gets out of hand.
Subject: T110's Long, Comfortable, Nights by the Fireside
Link on message: #10701630
Lucario_Loves_Minecraft, on Jan 19 2017 - 02:57, said: Uh... not trying to be rude (if I am), but... Could someone explain
this thread? (if question answered, then please direct me to that
page via link)
Link on message: #10701630
Lucario_Loves_Minecraft, on Jan 19 2017 - 02:57, said: Uh... not trying to be rude (if I am), but... Could someone explain
this thread? (if question answered, then please direct me to that
page via link)The_Chieftain: Well, if you read the first post of this thread, then
back-track to the previous thread with the link in the first post,
and then you can back-track to that one as well.... This
thread is one of those forms of chaos theory in which there is a
small island of calm, where the normal rules don't apply.
Which reminds me, I think it's coming up on time to close this one
down and start a fourth. Over 4,100 pages.
Subject: Hunnicutt's "Firepower"
Link on message: #10701180
_Jelly_Tank_, on Jan 18 2017 - 17:30, said: Hey Chieftain any chance of getting one signed by you
and/or the author?
Link on message: #10701180
_Jelly_Tank_, on Jan 18 2017 - 17:30, said: Hey Chieftain any chance of getting one signed by you
and/or the author?The_Chieftain: If I happen to be in the same place as the book at the same
time, possible.
Реклама | Adv















