Developers posts on forum

Subject: Problemas con el programa de reclutamiento
Link on message: #14718614

Phozas, on 31 August 2017 - 11:46 AM, said:   Precisamente hoy te iba a mandar un privado preguntando por el tema. Gracias

Subject: Highly likely my last post (at least for a while)
Link on message: #14718398

Subject: Saison der gewerteten Gefechte
Link on message: #14718392

Subject: Highly likely my last post (at least for a while)
Link on message: #14718345

Subject: Odwoładnie od bana
Link on message: #14718318

rvader, on 30 August 2017 - 10:33 AM, said: ...powtórka i pisz do supportu .

Subject: P2W i ustawianie bitew przez WG
Link on message: #14718266

Subject: WoT Suggestions Thread
Link on message: #14718226

Subject: Spielintegrität
Link on message: #14718201

Subject: Problemas con el programa de reclutamiento
Link on message: #14718164

Phozas, on 28 August 2017 - 05:45 PM, said: Ya te he contestado al privado, muchas gracias. A ver que se puede hacer o si retocáis esas cosillas

Subject: WZ-120-1G FT: el nuevo cazacarros premium chino
Link on message: #14718154

Maesu_Sensei, on 30 August 2017 - 10:05 PM, said: @Delhroh o @CurlyJohnny ¿Alguno tiene idea de cuando van a poner a la venta el AMX CdA 105 aproximadamente? Porque me gustan mucho los anticarros y en concreto me llama la atención tanto el nuevo chino como el francés, y no tengo cartera para los dos, he visto ademas que ya está metido en los archivos del juego y se puede previsualizar.   Puedo esperar casi 2 meses que es lo que va a estar a la venta el chino en la tienda, pero si en ese tiempo no se pone a la venta el francés tendré que tomar una decisión abrupta.   Por cierto otra cosa, ¿sabéis si pasados los dos meses, para la próxima actualización, lo meterán dentro del juego para comprar por oro como se hizo con el Strv S1? Yo quiero pensar que si, ya que suele hacerse con los carros que no son "especiales" si no que son necesarios para que haya al menos uno de su rama y de su país, en concreto, anticarros chinos que no tienen ningún otro premium y es una rama nueva, como en su día paso con el Strv S1 y la rama sueca como ya he dicho.

Subject: Código para nuevos jugadores - PANINI
Link on message: #14718137

rocannrol, on 30 August 2017 - 05:11 PM, said:   Solucionado¡ gracias a los dos por la rapidez en las respuestas, porque fallos los cometemos todos, pero la solución y la rapidez en solucionarlos es lo que distingue la excelencia de la mediocridad, vuestra respuesta tiene un nombre y se llama buena atención al cliente, y se agradece mucho, no solo hemos de decir las cosas malas, las buenas también. Un saludo a los dos.

Subject: Team Attacks im Spiel
Link on message: #14718131

Subject: Linki "Polecane": "Wspólne granie", "Samouczki i Poradni...
Link on message: #14718072

Subject: How about fixing that MM like you promised?
Link on message: #14718041

Subject: This game needs cows
Link on message: #14718030

Subject: Update 9.20 Feedback - New Chinese Tank Destroyers
Link on message: #14717952

Akathis, on 30 August 2017 - 10:38 PM, said: Is this guy real? Or is he trolling us all hard?   1º. High tier LTs have around 35% concealment. 2º. Many high tier TDs (swedish, chinese, german tds for example) have waaaaay more concealment and/or view range than LTs. And their role is essentialy camping behind bushes => they have BY FAAAAAAAR the edge over LTs in a spotting contest. 3º. High tier TDs have more dpm/alpha/armor than LTs. I dont remember if TDs have more hps than LTs. But I am pretty sure LTs can not circle them easily. 4º. Take a look at LTs performance stats WG developers do have: you will understand what we are trying to explain to you.   Since 8.6 patch we are telling WG that it is making mistakes: accuracy buff to benefit soviet tanks => TDs reign => corridors to avoid the issue => HTs reign => premium ammo issue => armor inflation to avoid the issue => tanks are only competitive with crazy values of penetration/armor/alpha/accuracy/camo/mobility all at the same time... and guess what => POWERCREEP => inflation of buffs.   Tier 8 onwards chinese TDs are crazy, and you could have realized it if you had made a real common test with no premium ammo and competent players. You should not design tanks to fit the no skilled playerbase, because that way pro players can own like a boss in the same tank to that "no skilled playerbase".

Subject: Foch e Grille
Link on message: #14717891

Subject: WG can you finally fix the MM?
Link on message: #14717889

Subject: serverprobleme
Link on message: #14717844

Subject: GİF Paylaşımı
Link on message: #14717831

Subject: Aggiornamento 9.20 - Segnalazione bug
Link on message: #14717729

Subject: Wie kaputt ist das Spiel und die ganzen Tomaten
Link on message: #14717707

FeelsPekoMan, on 31 August 2017 - 08:12 AM, said: ...   Ansonsten: Besser in der Frusttherapie posten 

Subject: Rilascio aggiornamento 9.20
Link on message: #14717650

Subject: Immer das selbe Bild was Sieg- und Niederlagenserien betrifft
Link on message: #14717563

Subject: Standard procedures
Link on message: #14717094

Subject: "The Forum Bar" - Off-Topic Thread - "All the Locusts are sold ou...
Link on message: #14716354

fishbob101, on 30 August 2017 - 08:33 PM, said:

Subject: Serverwartung - Mittwoch, 30. August
Link on message: #14715158

Subject: Soru & Cevap Başlığı
Link on message: #14714997

Subject: WZ-113G FT
Link on message: #14714875

Subject: WZ-111G FT
Link on message: #14714851

Subject: WZ-111-1G FT
Link on message: #14714844

Subject: T-34-2G FT
Link on message: #14714825

Subject: Update 9.20 - General Feedback
Link on message: #14714804

fighting_falcon93, on 30 August 2017 - 04:53 PM, said:   Are there any plans to allow us to buy permanent camo for bonds? 


siramra, on 30 August 2017 - 04:48 PM, said:   There have been lots of Things u never planned to put in the shop earlier too.

Subject: WZ-131G FT
Link on message: #14714795

Subject: 60G FT
Link on message: #14714792

Subject: SU-76G FT
Link on message: #14714782

Subject: M3G FT
Link on message: #14714776

Subject: T-26G FT
Link on message: #14714773

Subject: Update 9.20 - General Feedback
Link on message: #14714736

siramra, on 30 August 2017 - 04:36 PM, said: I see u put bonds in all tier X gameplay now. So when will u cater the ones who can`t earn them in games by putting it in the giftshop then? I don`t like anything u did With the arties, specially the stun. And I sure as hell don`t like this bonds stuff. So it looks like I`ll still be playing other games.

Subject: Update 9.20 Feedback - New Chinese Tank Destroyers
Link on message: #14714718

TheGamingLion, on 30 August 2017 - 04:00 PM, said:   Let's see. The Chinese T10 TD's camouflage values are almost as good as those of T10 LTs. It has armor, in other words will have a much easier time surviving upon being spotted, than a T10 LT. It has a very strong gun, while the guns on T10 LTs are jokes. It will succeed on all corridor-maps, which T10 LTs are practically useless on. It will spot enemy vehicles just as far away as certain T10 LTs (which are supposedly in the game mainly for spotting), if not even further away due to encouraging binocular-gameplay, while being just as unspotted due to similar camo values. But hey, T10 LTs have mobility that is fairly bottlenecked by lacking traverse speed. So I guess that's balanced.


TheGamingLion, on 30 August 2017 - 04:00 PM, said: When I look at quite some of your (especially recent) LTs' statistics I don't understand how you can't admit that LTs are currently not really able to perform their role. Especially considering that your other tanks' stats imply that you are able to play this game perfectly fine.


Dr_Oolen, on 30 August 2017 - 04:00 PM, said:   Unlike majority of players of the game and its developers, people who actually understand the game and are good at it can tell when a tank is op or up without ever having to touch the tank in the game just by looking at its stats in a spreadsheet (oh jeez, i know certainly no players at all instantly said maus and type would be op as [edited]when the buffs leaked several months before testserver, testserver during which WG managed to buff maus even more; or certainly no one ever said t10 lights would suck [edited]). But i guess that is a concept that you probably wouldnt understand.