Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Update 9.20 Feedback - New Chinese Tank Destroyers

Дата: 30.08.2017 18:39:56
View PostTheGamingLion, on 30 August 2017 - 04:00 PM, said:   Let's see. The Chinese T10 TD's camouflage values are almost as good as those of T10 LTs. It has armor, in other words will have a much easier time surviving upon being spotted, than a T10 LT. It has a very strong gun, while the guns on T10 LTs are jokes. It will succeed on all corridor-maps, which T10 LTs are practically useless on. It will spot enemy vehicles just as far away as certain T10 LTs (which are supposedly in the game mainly for spotting), if not even further away due to encouraging binocular-gameplay, while being just as unspotted due to similar camo values. But hey, T10 LTs have mobility that is fairly bottlenecked by lacking traverse speed. So I guess that's balanced.

Kayi4ek:   - "Almost" - LT has much better concealment on the move. And at some point (in most cases) you have to move with your TD if you want to win. - Agree and disagree. Depends on the situation. - Check the ST thread http://forum.worldof...mes-after-920/. I played only T-100 LT and Tier IX WZ, so I can't compare with other LTs. I'm not complaining about the guns. T-100 LT could have 320 alpha, but I can live with the 300. - You can succeed on corridor maps, but you have to adapt your gameplay. I'm not saying it's easy, but it is possible to have sustainable results. - Yes, that's true. But with this TD you can't afford to use same positions as LT. You can't use the landscape, the mobility, etc. + the WZ doesn't have the turret. Honestly for me, TDs like this are just free dmg in the end of the battle. - Again I didn't try other high tier LTs than the WZ and T-100 LT. Tier IX WZ has lower mobility, but it has higher alpha and better armor. T-100 LT - no issues with traverse speed.  

View PostTheGamingLion, on 30 August 2017 - 04:00 PM, said: When I look at quite some of your (especially recent) LTs' statistics I don't understand how you can't admit that LTs are currently not really able to perform their role. Especially considering that your other tanks' stats imply that you are able to play this game perfectly fine.

Kayi4ek:   I'm not playing in platoons and it's not that easy to padd the WR in LT, that's true. Cause you are more depending on your team.  

View PostDr_Oolen, on 30 August 2017 - 04:00 PM, said:   Unlike majority of players of the game and its developers, people who actually understand the game and are good at it can tell when a tank is op or up without ever having to touch the tank in the game just by looking at its stats in a spreadsheet (oh jeez, i know certainly no players at all instantly said maus and type would be op as [edited]when the buffs leaked several months before testserver, testserver during which WG managed to buff maus even more; or certainly no one ever said t10 lights would suck [edited]). But i guess that is a concept that you probably wouldnt understand.

Kayi4ek:   I understand your concept. But we can't make game for 0,001% of our players base.

Реклама | Adv