Developers posts on forum

Subject: La existencia descarada de bots en el juego
Link on message: #15591216

Subject: Traducción del hilo de Q&A del foro ruso
Link on message: #15591140

Subject: Dlaczego nie zmienicie nazwy tego gówna na RNG WON?
Link on message: #15590971

Subject: and still no word from wg, think i need to
Link on message: #15590838

Subject: Please, do something about TK!
Link on message: #15590802

Subject: racist rules for general chat
Link on message: #15590621

maturkh, on 31 March 2018 - 04:22 PM, said: Main channel on your chat shouldnt be only on english. its not true that everyone speak english and its very racist to make people use one language by threating them with ban that will actually affect all chats in game. example: someone from bosnia install a game, he dont know english, he come to general chat to make friends and try to get some answers about gameplay, he write: jel ima ko domaći, next thing that happens, he got banned for not using english so he cant use chat at all. can you guess what he will do next when he realises that he lost his only mean of contact with other players because he asked one question?  main channel should be for all languages,subchannels can be on specific languages

Subject: Account banned 1 hour for..... ?
Link on message: #15590454

Subject: Arty platoons
Link on message: #15590396

Subject: Mod to auto report arty for unsportsmanlike conduct?
Link on message: #15590382

Subject: haha amx 13 57 funny april joke wg lol
Link on message: #15588770

Subject: Hello,
Link on message: #15587161

Subject: Incoming with 1.0: premium for bonds?
Link on message: #15583951

Ectar, on 28 March 2018 - 11:42 PM, said:  Yes, the Mutant was later sold. But the clan wars tanks haven't been sold and the other pre order tanks haven't been sold.

Subject: Problem ze sklepem premium - Nie można dokonać zakupu
Link on message: #15583858

Block Quote Problem ze sklepem premium - Nie można dokonać zakupu

Subject: Problem ze sklepem premium - Nie można dokonać zakupu
Link on message: #15583853

Block Quote Problem ze sklepem premium - Nie można dokonać zakupu

Subject: mesaventure wotienne mais fin heureuse
Link on message: #15583024

Subject: Rejoigner mon clans: PINUP FR
Link on message: #15582655

XXShroedingerXX, on 31 March 2018 - 08:39 AM, said: *edited*   C'est mieux ? mais il n'y aura que les CVR pour comprendre la blague....

Subject: Problème technique : l'XP ne monte plus !
Link on message: #15582633

Subject: Rejoigner mon clans: PINUP FR
Link on message: #15582590

Subject: Les mecs qui play mods....
Link on message: #15582542

règles du forum   Merci de ne pas : Accuser d’autres joueurs d’être toxiques en jeu Accuser d’autres joueurs de triche ou d’utilisation de services interdits

Subject: plus beaucoup de joueurs
Link on message: #15582532

Subject: Pathfinder: be the first to compete on HD maps
Link on message: #15580742

TijgernootTank, on 30 March 2018 - 01:39 PM, said: All in all this is a nice event . As it is competition over 3 tourneys , i do miss the possibility to check out standings . In all tourneys there is a luck factor envolved , the draw of the groups for instance . I feel this is certainly the case with the damage competition . U can be in a group where u play 9 matches versus complete teams , but you can also be in a group where u get several technical victories or face incomplete teams . As it is over 3 tourneys , there can be a difference in the amount of actual games played that makes that a lot of teams will have no chance to be top damage dealers . Also i still feel there should be some prizes  in the groups in all tourneys as well . I would like to see events like this anounced at earlier date . Also i would like events where other tiers will be used , its all t6 and t8 , i miss the t4 tournaments and would like to see tournaments for all other tiers as well . In the description of the tournaments , reserve players are mentioned , but i cannot remember the last time they where allowed , i feel reserve players should be allowed in events more often .

Subject: Pathfinder - Questions & Answers
Link on message: #15580577

Hakensik, on 30 March 2018 - 03:30 PM, said: Is any possibility to confirm my team? 1.5h before start and i just not press confirm, but we register to turnament,..

Subject: 24hr Day/Night Cycle In The New Garage - Possible?
Link on message: #15580527

Tankyouverymuch2, on 29 March 2018 - 11:04 PM, said: Hell I'll even make a poll to see better what you guys think...   So tonight I was playing WoT as usual, but I somehow lost track of time...and before I knew it, it was midnight Then I had a lightbulb moment.   We now have an open garage, in the woods, out in the fresh air where the Sun's rays light up the hazy morning mist, as the tankers in the base camp prepare for battle...but should we stop there?   Definitely not.   What if the garage actually had real-time day progression? In the mornings, when the servers come back online after downtime, it would look like it does now.   In the middle of the day (ex. 11:00 til 16:00) it would be a bright hot day, with distant sounds of gunfire, as the tankers, and soldiers, go into battle, with a few people left in the nearby tent, keeping check of the battle happening in the background ambience, the ambience now including radiowaves from the camp's transmission relay.   In the evenings (ex. 16:00 til 20:00) the light begins to fade as the day ends, the battle has stopped, and the camp's medical team is taking care of injured soldiers, while the mechanics beat on the twisted tank metal to patch up the damage sustained in battle (wrenching bolts, welding parts).   During the night (ex. 20:00 til 6:00) It's a peaceful night, the moon is shining and reflecting off the water, crickets can be heard, along with the voices of all the tankers gathered around a campfire, telling stories or explaining how they destroyed an enemy tank (possibly explaining tactics which could be used in the game?), etc.   Just imagine each of those settings visually, and tell me what you think about it, I'm curious.

Subject: Do you lose your camo paint if you sell a tank with it applied?
Link on message: #15580487

Cobra6, on 30 March 2018 - 09:46 AM, said: I'm a bit confused on this one, had the IS with camo applied and I sold it without demounting the camouflage. It seems that now I'm missing the camouflages from my depot.   So: Do you just lose camo if you forget to demount it? And: If so, if I buy the IS back can I demount the camo and remount it on the IS-M as normal?   Cobra 6

Subject: Just some Glacier eye-candy
Link on message: #15580472

PoIestar, on 29 March 2018 - 08:09 PM, said: I finally bought the B-C 25 t as I wanted for a while now, sadly I had to play solo to test it which I'd rather avoid. I had some crap games I'd rather forget, but then I got spawned on Glacier.   And my actual God, regardless of the fun that a Bat Chat is as I discovered, that map is so sexeh.   So I can't even be bothered to talk about results here, just enjoy some pictures I made because this looked spectacular.           (ps the images seem compressed, it looked even better in-game imho) also, some comments on the Glacier map: it's a fun and diverse map where every type of tank seems to be at home somehow, there's one small thing: the Mines-esque rush-hill (the actual glacier visible in shot 2) is rather imbalanced. Not only was it easy for me and a 430U to get there very quickly with not even a sign of an enemy, I, with my lousy gundep could hit all kinds of enemies in the enemy spawn, when I tried to shoot enemies engaging my own spawn the snipe spot on that side wasn't good enough to hit anything, only to get hit from. So the South spawn has a slight advantage there, methinks. 

Subject: I can't see the enemy
Link on message: #15580462

unhappy_bunny, on 29 March 2018 - 12:49 PM, said: Odd.  I would suggest sending the replay to WG support and raising a ticket explaining what happened, and reporting it as a bug. 

Subject: Verbesserungsvorschlag ohne Nachteile !
Link on message: #15580340

Subject: Chevron
Link on message: #15580338

Subject: Where is the arty sweetspot now?
Link on message: #15580325

Subject: Speciale: Tutto per l’equipaggio
Link on message: #15580318

Darius_B1bis, on 30 March 2018 - 01:00 PM, said: la coincidenza con Pasqua e Pasquetta, però, è sconcertante.

Subject: WG, Constructive Feedback, ALL feedback is constructive
Link on message: #15580315

_Anarchistic_, on 30 March 2018 - 01:18 PM, said: So after seeing multiple threads on many subjects closed by moderators for not being constructive thought I would try a different approach.   For me there are 3 issues-   1- all feedback is constructive, it explains the players feelings about the game, expresses their anger, hopes etc therefore ALL feedback is constructive.  Not liking the feedback is irrelevant, only wanting feedback that pats you on the head is not positive feedback, it is not constructive in any way, the truth is absolute and if multiple players, multiple threads all say the same thing then you as a company HAVE to listen and take it on board.     this leads on to 2   2-  ignoring feedback, WG have been ignoring almost every piece of feedback ever given, whether it be on these forums, on the test server or on the sandbox.  Arty is still in the game, the changes to arty were universally hated on test server but still implemented.  you can see the same with Japanese heavy tanks, 268v4, 430U etc etc etc.. This is also true regarding the sandbox, look at all the posts about steppes but nothing taken on board, just plough on regardess and make the game worse.  Now we have erlenberg, same thing, test server feedback all say this map is worse but again WG do not listen.  As a result the game is getting more and more unbalanced, more and more dumbed down and less and less new player friendly, check my F2P experiment or watch the Shishx vids.  closing posts is not the answer which leads me on to 3   3- shutting down the debate.  what is the point of sandbox, test servers and forums if you ignore the feedback and shut things down.  why issue threats against guys like Sir_Foch because what he says is correct or because you do not like what people say, take it on the chin, be open and honest and listen and if you don't think the average player knows, at least listen to the great players from ESL, CCs etc, players who really know this game and how to improve it   Obvioulsy personal attacks on people are not acceptable, again as WG found out when they attacked Sir_Foch, but questions are acceptable, for example how did Phelan keep his job after that fiasco   in conclusion ALL FEEDBACK IS CONSTRUCTIVE. It may not be what you want to hear, it may be critical and point out your mistakes but there are reasons for forums and players making posts, listen to your players and you would have avoided most of the mistakes you have been making


Block Quote truth is absolute and if multiple players, multiple threads all say the same thing then you as a company HAVE to listen and take it on board.  


Block Quote 2- ignoring feedback, WG have been ignoring almost every piece of feedback ever given, whether it be on these forums, on the test server or on the sandbox.  Arty is still in the game, the changes to arty were universally hated on test server but still implemented.  you can see the same with Japanese heavy tanks, 268v4, 430U etc etc etc.. This is also true regarding the sandbox, look at all the posts about steppes but nothing taken on board, just plough on regardess and make the game worse.  Now we have erlenberg, same thing, test server feedback all say this map is worse but again WG do not listen.  As a result the game is getting more and more unbalanced, more and more dumbed down and less and less new player friendly, check my F2P experiment or watch the Shishx vids.  closing posts is not the answer which leads me on to 3


Block Quote  3- shutting down the debate.  what is the point of sandbox, test servers and forums if you ignore the feedback and shut things down. 

Subject: **IMPORTANT UPDATE, Re-read first post** RamRaid90 Community Events (Event 4)...
Link on message: #15580279

RamRaid90, on 30 March 2018 - 03:57 PM, said: Important update in first post

Subject: Chat Issues - 24/01
Link on message: #15580224

Subject: Pero quesesto! Nuevo modo?
Link on message: #15579985

Subject: Dark260
Link on message: #15579952

Subject: Concurso de Screenshots! Atrapa la 1.0
Link on message: #15579924

Redraven59, on 30 March 2018 - 12:21 PM, said:   Venga, edito y le añado la replay ... si la encuentro

Subject: Consulta: ¿Directo de Contributors & Staff sobre historia?
Link on message: #15579900

Darkaes, on 30 March 2018 - 08:36 AM, said:  Yo creo que depende de como vayas a tratar los temas en cuestion. Pues a dia de hoy hay muy buenos podcast especializados en estas materias.  Te daria un si con condiciones, porque si no me vas a conseguir aportar una novedad, una chispa de genialidad que me haga quedarme, tengo decenas de horas mensuales de divulgadores historicos tratando estos temas e incluso conferencias subidas regularmente.   Asi que la cuestion no es de que vas a hablar, si no el como vas a estructurar el "programa", habeis preparado alguna escaleta y contenido previo para mostrar lo que se puede preparar?. Que tono pretendeis utilizar? Sera seccionado o monografico? De corta duración, larga?    

Subject: WG, Constructive Feedback, ALL feedback is constructive
Link on message: #15579641

Subject: remove arty from matchmaking
Link on message: #15579477

Subject: matchmaker POS!
Link on message: #15579443