WG, Constructive Feedback, ALL feedback is constructive

_Anarchistic_, on 30 March 2018 - 01:18 PM, said: So after seeing multiple threads on many subjects closed by moderators for not being constructive thought I would try a different approach.   For me there are 3 issues-   1- all feedback is constructive, it explains the players feelings about the game, expresses their anger, hopes etc therefore ALL feedback is constructive.  Not liking the feedback is irrelevant, only wanting feedback that pats you on the head is not positive feedback, it is not constructive in any way, the truth is absolute and if multiple players, multiple threads all say the same thing then you as a company HAVE to listen and take it on board.     this leads on to 2   2-  ignoring feedback, WG have been ignoring almost every piece of feedback ever given, whether it be on these forums, on the test server or on the sandbox.  Arty is still in the game, the changes to arty were universally hated on test server but still implemented.  you can see the same with Japanese heavy tanks, 268v4, 430U etc etc etc.. This is also true regarding the sandbox, look at all the posts about steppes but nothing taken on board, just plough on regardess and make the game worse.  Now we have erlenberg, same thing, test server feedback all say this map is worse but again WG do not listen.  As a result the game is getting more and more unbalanced, more and more dumbed down and less and less new player friendly, check my F2P experiment or watch the Shishx vids.  closing posts is not the answer which leads me on to 3   3- shutting down the debate.  what is the point of sandbox, test servers and forums if you ignore the feedback and shut things down.  why issue threats against guys like Sir_Foch because what he says is correct or because you do not like what people say, take it on the chin, be open and honest and listen and if you don't think the average player knows, at least listen to the great players from ESL, CCs etc, players who really know this game and how to improve it   Obvioulsy personal attacks on people are not acceptable, again as WG found out when they attacked Sir_Foch, but questions are acceptable, for example how did Phelan keep his job after that fiasco   in conclusion ALL FEEDBACK IS CONSTRUCTIVE. It may not be what you want to hear, it may be critical and point out your mistakes but there are reasons for forums and players making posts, listen to your players and you would have avoided most of the mistakes you have been making


Block Quote truth is absolute and if multiple players, multiple threads all say the same thing then you as a company HAVE to listen and take it on board.  


Block Quote 2- ignoring feedback, WG have been ignoring almost every piece of feedback ever given, whether it be on these forums, on the test server or on the sandbox.  Arty is still in the game, the changes to arty were universally hated on test server but still implemented.  you can see the same with Japanese heavy tanks, 268v4, 430U etc etc etc.. This is also true regarding the sandbox, look at all the posts about steppes but nothing taken on board, just plough on regardess and make the game worse.  Now we have erlenberg, same thing, test server feedback all say this map is worse but again WG do not listen.  As a result the game is getting more and more unbalanced, more and more dumbed down and less and less new player friendly, check my F2P experiment or watch the Shishx vids.  closing posts is not the answer which leads me on to 3


Block Quote  3- shutting down the debate.  what is the point of sandbox, test servers and forums if you ignore the feedback and shut things down.