Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Type 64 | Yes or no?
Link on message: #16585859
Link on message: #16585859
Asklepi0s: This thread has been moved to newcomers section.
Subject: Tier VIII Light Tank | Camoflage net?
Link on message: #16585774
Link on message: #16585774
Asklepi0s: This thread has been moved to new comers section.
Subject: CPU and GPU usage in garage
Link on message: #16585766
Link on message: #16585766
Asklepi0s: This thread has been moved to tech corner.
Subject: Troll your own team - Wargaming don't accept tickets about it!
Link on message: #16585739
Baldrickk, on 23 January 2019 - 11:21 AM, said: Raise the ticket with a topic of "physics abuse".
Link on message: #16585739
Baldrickk, on 23 January 2019 - 11:21 AM, said: Raise the ticket with a topic of "physics abuse".Asklepi0s: That is how you do it !
Please send a ticket about "physics abuse".
Thread is closed.
Please send a ticket about "physics abuse".
Thread is closed.
Subject: Wheeled arty
Link on message: #16585735
Link on message: #16585735
Asklepi0s: Due to the high number of Artillery threads, we want discussions to
take place in the main pinned thread here.
Subject: Lost and forgotten
Link on message: #16585725
Link on message: #16585725
Asklepi0s: Please open ticket regarding your problem.
Thread is closed.
Thread is closed.
Subject: WG strikes again
Link on message: #16585717
Link on message: #16585717
Asklepi0s:
This thread has been closed by the moderation team due to not being constructive
This thread has been closed by the moderation team due to not being constructive
Subject: We need more than 10 likes a day
Link on message: #16585710
Baldrickk, on 24 January 2019 - 07:34 PM, said: I miss when gameplay was "General discussion"
And I think there are good points raised here which will now never see the light of day, having found themselves in the Edited
Link on message: #16585710
Baldrickk, on 24 January 2019 - 07:34 PM, said: I miss when gameplay was "General discussion"And I think there are good points raised here which will now never see the light of day, having found themselves in the Edited
Asklepi0s: You can always contact me and after checking the case i can
always move it back.
Thank you for your understanding.
Thank you for your understanding.
Subject: Improved graphics ?
Link on message: #16585704
Link on message: #16585704
eekeeboo: These graphical updates and changes were made quite some time ago!
Is there a chance your gpu settings were reset to default and thus
slightly higher than before?
Subject: ¡Cambiad lo viejo por lo nuevo!
Link on message: #16585674
ttkohete, on 24 January 2019 - 06:35 PM, said: Y mientras sigais faltando el respeto, poniendo el pie detras de la
línea roja, seguirán borrando vuestros comentarios, con lo fácil
que es hacer una crítica construcitva, pues no, a vociferar cual
plañidera a sueldo. las formas os pierden... delhroh, por
favor transmite nuestra disconformidad total y absoluta con
respecto a ese "evento, oferta,cosa" Gracias.
Link on message: #16585674
ttkohete, on 24 January 2019 - 06:35 PM, said: Y mientras sigais faltando el respeto, poniendo el pie detras de la
línea roja, seguirán borrando vuestros comentarios, con lo fácil
que es hacer una crítica construcitva, pues no, a vociferar cual
plañidera a sueldo. las formas os pierden... delhroh, por
favor transmite nuestra disconformidad total y absoluta con
respecto a ese "evento, oferta,cosa" Gracias.Delhroh: Claro, por supuesto. Si no lo hiciera algo mal estaría
haciendo. Como ya he dicho muchas veces, se puede criticar
algo sin necesidad de usar lenguaje no apropiado o postear
solamente para crear malestar (flames). Y NO, no voy a
consentir que llaméis a los miembros del Staff "estafadores" o
similares. La permuta ES VOLUNTARIA, y además se especifica
CLARAMENTE como funciona. Comentarios parecidos serán eliminados y
los jugadores sancionados acorde con las normas del foro. Un
saludo.
Subject: Match maker 150+ games trolled winrate
Link on message: #16585671
Link on message: #16585671
Asklepi0s: Due to the high number of Match Making, we want discussions to take
place in the main pinned thread here.
Subject: Why WoT players are so toxic?
Link on message: #16585636
Link on message: #16585636
Asklepi0s: Thread has been closed by the moderation team due to not being
constructive.
Subject: Public Test 1.4 General Feedback
Link on message: #16585632
jonnieb, on 24 January 2019 - 04:01 PM, said: I have posted here multiple times in different sections of this
forum. I have been well-spoken and have tried to provide well
thought out commentary. Why are most of my posts GONE?
Link on message: #16585632
jonnieb, on 24 January 2019 - 04:01 PM, said: I have posted here multiple times in different sections of this
forum. I have been well-spoken and have tried to provide well
thought out commentary. Why are most of my posts GONE?eekeeboo: I've just checked, you received no moderation, no warnings
or points and your posts I can see on your profile are still there.
Can you please confirm you're missing posts because as far as I can
see, they're all there.
Subject: Public Test 1.4 Changes to Reward Tanks
Link on message: #16585621
blockypanzer, on 23 January 2019 - 05:43 PM, said: For someone who accused me of not reading posts, you seem to have
not read my post. I specified the range (200m), the target
(lower front plate) and the % of hits and pens. For the record,
some shots missed the LFP, hit the turret or UFP and obviously
bounced, but for the purpose of the test (sniping at 200m with the
Leo at a fairly large weakspot on an IS7) the accuracy % ought to
be measured by shots actually landing where you aim them. I
brought up this video/test as an example of the game mechanics
which, as a player you have no power over, causing a very high rate
of misses. That was with a very accurate gun (maxed out Leo is 0.27
acc) vs a large weakspot (LFP of IS7) at reasonably close range
(200m) with both vehicles totally stationary and every shot fully
aimed. In the context of Ville67's point about the Object
279e cupola and missing it 95% of the time (which I still believe
you belittled in your reply, which you A. denied sending, and B.
seem to think was acceptable for someone in your position) we're
talking real game scenarios, where the enemy is likely moving,
fully aiming your shots is a luxury that cannot usually be
afforded, and range may not be so close. As I said, even if you had
an aimbot that locked onto that tiny weakspot, by the mechanics of
the game alone, you'd miss it 95% of the time like they said. Guns
in world of tanks are not lasers, and after 45K battles you should
know well enough that weakspots like this are not worth even trying
to hit under most conditions. Despite knowing this, you still
suggested the player was at fault and not the game mechanics
relating to weapon accuracy, or the laughably small size of the
weakspot in the first place. Your reply took a valid concern (the
only frontal weakspot is tiny and all-but impossible to hit) and
threw it back at the player, implying they were directly at fault
and should do something about it themselves. At what
point are you going to take on board some feedback from these
forums without dismissing it, belittling people's concerns about
the game, changing the topic, or just outright deleting posts? Can
we get another team member to speak to us about this please?
Link on message: #16585621
blockypanzer, on 23 January 2019 - 05:43 PM, said: For someone who accused me of not reading posts, you seem to have
not read my post. I specified the range (200m), the target
(lower front plate) and the % of hits and pens. For the record,
some shots missed the LFP, hit the turret or UFP and obviously
bounced, but for the purpose of the test (sniping at 200m with the
Leo at a fairly large weakspot on an IS7) the accuracy % ought to
be measured by shots actually landing where you aim them. I
brought up this video/test as an example of the game mechanics
which, as a player you have no power over, causing a very high rate
of misses. That was with a very accurate gun (maxed out Leo is 0.27
acc) vs a large weakspot (LFP of IS7) at reasonably close range
(200m) with both vehicles totally stationary and every shot fully
aimed. In the context of Ville67's point about the Object
279e cupola and missing it 95% of the time (which I still believe
you belittled in your reply, which you A. denied sending, and B.
seem to think was acceptable for someone in your position) we're
talking real game scenarios, where the enemy is likely moving,
fully aiming your shots is a luxury that cannot usually be
afforded, and range may not be so close. As I said, even if you had
an aimbot that locked onto that tiny weakspot, by the mechanics of
the game alone, you'd miss it 95% of the time like they said. Guns
in world of tanks are not lasers, and after 45K battles you should
know well enough that weakspots like this are not worth even trying
to hit under most conditions. Despite knowing this, you still
suggested the player was at fault and not the game mechanics
relating to weapon accuracy, or the laughably small size of the
weakspot in the first place. Your reply took a valid concern (the
only frontal weakspot is tiny and all-but impossible to hit) and
threw it back at the player, implying they were directly at fault
and should do something about it themselves. At what
point are you going to take on board some feedback from these
forums without dismissing it, belittling people's concerns about
the game, changing the topic, or just outright deleting posts? Can
we get another team member to speak to us about this please?eekeeboo: Yes I read it, once again there's a difference between
"Missing shots 95% of the time" and "Not hitting and penetrating
70% of the time". Please take the time to read the full response,
unless you're saying he missed 95% of his shots and the 5% that hit
only 30% penned? It's not about belittling it's about
making realistic claims, if you make an unrealistic claim to try
and prove a point, you need to consider carefully what you say.
Again, when this becomes unrealistic to expect people to think and
consider before making wild and untrue claims. Guns aren't lasers,
but the only reason you would EVER miss the cupola 95% of the time
is if you're at an extreme range or an odd angle. Furthermore, if
you are going to sit there in that situation, you cannot blame the
tank because you were unwilling to re-aim, relocate or change
tactic. If you're aiming at the cupola and relying on
this shot to get damage, there's a great deal many things you could
have done leading up to this point to avoid that, least of
which.... moving. There's a difference between taking on legitimate
feedback and having to say to not encouraging to get better at a
game or call people out on lies, false claims and inaccurate or
biased opinions. For deleting posts, it's simple.
Follow the forum rules, don't get punishment. The fact you're
talking about the forum moderation, breaks the forum rules. People
who have posts deleted and here yourself, simply NOT reading what
you're being asked to read. At a certain stage I shouldn't need to
keep reminding you and pointing out to you, read the rules. It
doesn't matter how you feel about the rules, they are there for a
reason. You can follow them and stay on the forum, or you can keep
breaking them and leave the forum. It's your choice.
Subject: Should shaming about stats be punishable on forum?
Link on message: #16585609
Link on message: #16585609
Asklepi0s: This thread has been closed by the moderation team due to being
non-constructive.
Subject: Update 1.3 - Maps
Link on message: #16585584
neverluckybabyrage, on 24 January 2019 - 08:32 AM, said: How could i be more specific, when every single map has at
least 6-10 broken corner or ridgeline? Imo broken means, you can
see clearly the enemy vechicle, but you cant hit it, and you shoot
the invisible texture in corners, and on ridgelines. For example,
on redshire on the castle area has multiple corner, which this kind
of broken, or on mannerheim line, in j-k area has multiple
corners&ridgelines too, or on Karelia in A-B area,
etc.... So how could i be more specific??? Tons of
corners&ridgelines in the game. I can't name every single one.
Link on message: #16585584
neverluckybabyrage, on 24 January 2019 - 08:32 AM, said: How could i be more specific, when every single map has at
least 6-10 broken corner or ridgeline? Imo broken means, you can
see clearly the enemy vechicle, but you cant hit it, and you shoot
the invisible texture in corners, and on ridgelines. For example,
on redshire on the castle area has multiple corner, which this kind
of broken, or on mannerheim line, in j-k area has multiple
corners&ridgelines too, or on Karelia in A-B area,
etc.... So how could i be more specific??? Tons of
corners&ridgelines in the game. I can't name every single one.eekeeboo: Because you are saying ridges, which ones, on what maps at
what locations for what tanks and what guns? It's like someone
telling you to go and fix all the things to do with boxes in a box
storage warehouse that also sells boxes.
Subject: We need more than 10 likes a day
Link on message: #16585581
Link on message: #16585581
Asklepi0s: This thread has been moved to off-topic.
Please try to open threads in the right sections.
Please try to open threads in the right sections.
Subject: Update 1.3 - Bug reports
Link on message: #16585580
Link on message: #16585580
eekeeboo: Hi guys, you can find the update on this particular issue in the
announcements section of the forums.
Subject: Tech tree changes incoming!
Link on message: #16585568
Link on message: #16585568
Asklepi0s: This thread has been closed by the moderation team due to giving
wrong information.
Subject: Soldiers of Fortune: An Update on Compensation
Link on message: #16585560
Jumping_Turtle, on 24 January 2019 - 01:39 PM, said: So they can make deals not to attack eachother ...
Link on message: #16585560
Jumping_Turtle, on 24 January 2019 - 01:39 PM, said: So they can make deals not to attack eachother ...eekeeboo: That's not the entire story or picture though, I'm sure
you're aware of this.
Subject: Special: Maintenance and Improvement
Link on message: #16585553
Link on message: #16585553
eekeeboo: Thank you, I'll pass it on! Hopefully, we can get it fixed
tomorrow.
Subject: Turn Old to New!
Link on message: #16585517
Scorilo, on 24 January 2019 - 10:28 AM, said: Maybe we want to clear the clutter tier 3-4-5 useless premiums. Why
dont we have this option?
Zsoo86, on 24 January 2019 - 01:30 PM, said: eekeeboo, Do you really have any impact of what tanks are
gonna be showed up in the WG specials? Also Lorr 40T and
Somua SM should already be on that Trade in List, as those were
only available before we could get the tons of golds by the Loot
Box event, therefore we were unable to buy those at early December
with using that gold we just earned later.... Thanks.
Link on message: #16585517
Scorilo, on 24 January 2019 - 10:28 AM, said: Maybe we want to clear the clutter tier 3-4-5 useless premiums. Why
dont we have this option?eekeeboo: You'll notice the vehicles you can swap for being in the
tech tree and available to buy in-game. The ones you can trade in
are just the prominent ones in the garage. Please
also be aware that offers like these are laid out and decided far
in advance, there are many reasons among this, but here are some
basic answers that may help! 17:10 Added after 5 minutes
Zsoo86, on 24 January 2019 - 01:30 PM, said: eekeeboo, Do you really have any impact of what tanks are
gonna be showed up in the WG specials? Also Lorr 40T and
Somua SM should already be on that Trade in List, as those were
only available before we could get the tons of golds by the Loot
Box event, therefore we were unable to buy those at early December
with using that gold we just earned later.... Thanks.
eekeeboo: I can't promise I will have impact, but I can say "Players
would like to see....." and if there's enough feedback and there's
a good reason for it, this increases the chance. Of course this
doesn't mean it will happen, but it is better than not providing
awareness at all
Subject: Server Problems 23/01/2019
Link on message: #16585485
El_Cabanos, on 24 January 2019 - 01:49 PM, said: Can you tell how this bonuses FP work ?? i have 40% buff but
sometimes me and my clan members get 20% buff not 40% Yesterday my
clan get 107 FP from battle soo with this 40% buff i should get 149
PF - and I received 125 FP - sometimes give you 40% and
sometimes less Is there a special algorithm in addition to
those 40%?
AdmiralBroadside, on 24 January 2019 - 03:23 PM, said: Nice reply... Calling the comunity of late night Gamers
insane... Really mature respons from Wargaming...
Froschkrieger, on 24 January 2019 - 04:23 PM, said: Do we have a solution for this problem today?
Link on message: #16585485
El_Cabanos, on 24 January 2019 - 01:49 PM, said: Can you tell how this bonuses FP work ?? i have 40% buff but
sometimes me and my clan members get 20% buff not 40% Yesterday my
clan get 107 FP from battle soo with this 40% buff i should get 149
PF - and I received 125 FP - sometimes give you 40% and
sometimes less Is there a special algorithm in addition to
those 40%?eekeeboo: I've had one report of problems, but only the one. Can you
please provide more info? 16:59 Added after 0
minutes
AdmiralBroadside, on 24 January 2019 - 03:23 PM, said: Nice reply... Calling the comunity of late night Gamers
insane... Really mature respons from Wargaming... eekeeboo: Instead of looking for offence, look at the message i
replied to and stop trying to be offended when none was given. I
wonder how you would describe a person working at midnight when
their workday ended 7 hours previously? 17:00 Added after 1
minute
Froschkrieger, on 24 January 2019 - 04:23 PM, said: Do we have a solution for this problem today? eekeeboo: We're still assessing the full impact. I'm aware that a big
issue was with CW and that's the big focus from people. But this
was an entire server and for all players issue, so we're making
sure the issue is investigated fully with all information and
effects gathered before a decision on compensation takes place. We
want to get this right and not leave anyone out.
Subject: 50TP prototyp za darmo!?
Link on message: #16585464
OzzfanKa, on 24 January 2019 - 05:51 PM, said: Ty to Ty, my to co innego 
Link on message: #16585464
OzzfanKa, on 24 January 2019 - 05:51 PM, said: Ty to Ty, my to co innego parim1331: No ale w tym wypadku chyba to samo. 
Subject: FV4202, the Versatile Medium
Link on message: #16585421
EliteMeidling, on 24 January 2019 - 02:03 PM, said: Doesn't really feel representative for 3-5-7-tier-X-battles,
when the tier Xs are mostly SPGs and TDs. I wish I had your "mainly
soft enemy targets"-MM, sprinkled with a few zero damage skorpions
and defenders. I recommend you play a battle later this evening,
around a time we'd like to call "tier X o'clock", when the heavy
hitters are rolling out, would be more appropriate. Play your
FV4202 against a team with a Type 5 Heavy, a Obj 268v4 and a T110E3
and then show us what's left of your happy face. But on a
more serious note, I'd rather you wouldn't continue talking down
the game's issues when players are verbalising their concerns about
the game, and especially their subjectively negative perception of
its issues. It neither helps any of us to deal with these issues or
change our minds about them, it only creates more frustration and
alienation - not just among the playerbase. You can hardly suppress
or hide your fatigue and callousness yourself, and we all can see
it and start feeling unheard and ignored by WG. All I ask is for
some mature diplomacy and some kind of customer service, basically
a fruitful interaction between WG and their playerbase, instead of
what is currently being done: 
Link on message: #16585421
EliteMeidling, on 24 January 2019 - 02:03 PM, said: Doesn't really feel representative for 3-5-7-tier-X-battles,
when the tier Xs are mostly SPGs and TDs. I wish I had your "mainly
soft enemy targets"-MM, sprinkled with a few zero damage skorpions
and defenders. I recommend you play a battle later this evening,
around a time we'd like to call "tier X o'clock", when the heavy
hitters are rolling out, would be more appropriate. Play your
FV4202 against a team with a Type 5 Heavy, a Obj 268v4 and a T110E3
and then show us what's left of your happy face. But on a
more serious note, I'd rather you wouldn't continue talking down
the game's issues when players are verbalising their concerns about
the game, and especially their subjectively negative perception of
its issues. It neither helps any of us to deal with these issues or
change our minds about them, it only creates more frustration and
alienation - not just among the playerbase. You can hardly suppress
or hide your fatigue and callousness yourself, and we all can see
it and start feeling unheard and ignored by WG. All I ask is for
some mature diplomacy and some kind of customer service, basically
a fruitful interaction between WG and their playerbase, instead of
what is currently being done: 
eekeeboo: Some of these concerns though are valid and have a
point, but some of those are based on heavy bias like "Useless
against higher tiers/tier 10's" - But if you perform with it and
show you can, it's wrong. It's all about, but not in this situation
and not that tier 10, so and so forth. There is a stage when no
matter how good a game you have it becomes, but not that game, it's
not the same. This diplomacy and maturity
remain, with attempts to provide screenshots of good games, despite
my inability to force myself into tier 10 games. You are
essentially stating "You don't know how we feel, because you
don't know how we play and how it works." I'm sure you're an
alternate account and will not presume you do only have 453 battles
to illustrate you know how this tanks plays and how well to perform
in games.
Subject: Glücksritter: Update zu Entschädigungen
Link on message: #16585300
Link on message: #16585300
thePhilX: Hey, offizielles Update vom WG Competitive Team:
Wie ihr mitbekommen habt, war das Problem mit den Ingame-Währungen kein Weltkarten-Exklusivproblem, sondern ein globales Problem, was auch die Server der anderen Regionen betroffen hat und alle Spieler aus den Zufallsgefechten. Natürlich ist uns bewusst, dass es trotzdem negative Auswirkungen auf eure Clanwars-Gefechte hatte. Deshalb werden wir von unser Seite aus alle Strafpunkte fürs Nichtantreten von Gefechten entfernen, die innerhalb des Zeitraums entstanden sind. (konkret: alle Gefechte des Abends ab 21.00(UTC), also 22 Uhr in Deutschland) Natürlich erhaltet ihr damit auch verlorene Ruhmespunkte zurück, solltet ihr diese durch mehrfache Strafpunkte verloren haben.
An dieser Stelle ist zu sagen, dass aus oben genannten Gründen nicht das WoT Competitive-Team für Entschädigung verantwortlich ist, sondern der zuständige Bereich des Kundensupports. Sollte es eine Entschädigung geben, wovon z.Z. auszugehen ist, wird diese automatisiert ablaufen und ihr erhaltet weitere Informationen auf der Kundensupport-Website. Es ist nicht notwendig, dafür ein Ticket zu schreiben, da es für alle Spieler gemeinsam und automatisiert geregelt wird.
Grüße Phil
Wie ihr mitbekommen habt, war das Problem mit den Ingame-Währungen kein Weltkarten-Exklusivproblem, sondern ein globales Problem, was auch die Server der anderen Regionen betroffen hat und alle Spieler aus den Zufallsgefechten. Natürlich ist uns bewusst, dass es trotzdem negative Auswirkungen auf eure Clanwars-Gefechte hatte. Deshalb werden wir von unser Seite aus alle Strafpunkte fürs Nichtantreten von Gefechten entfernen, die innerhalb des Zeitraums entstanden sind. (konkret: alle Gefechte des Abends ab 21.00(UTC), also 22 Uhr in Deutschland) Natürlich erhaltet ihr damit auch verlorene Ruhmespunkte zurück, solltet ihr diese durch mehrfache Strafpunkte verloren haben.
An dieser Stelle ist zu sagen, dass aus oben genannten Gründen nicht das WoT Competitive-Team für Entschädigung verantwortlich ist, sondern der zuständige Bereich des Kundensupports. Sollte es eine Entschädigung geben, wovon z.Z. auszugehen ist, wird diese automatisiert ablaufen und ihr erhaltet weitere Informationen auf der Kundensupport-Website. Es ist nicht notwendig, dafür ein Ticket zu schreiben, da es für alle Spieler gemeinsam und automatisiert geregelt wird.
Grüße Phil
Subject: Sytuacja z wczorajszej Kampani i pytanie do Falathiego
Link on message: #16585278
ColdSutek, on 24 January 2019 - 05:02 PM, said: Dzieki za szybką odpowiedz parim1331.
Link on message: #16585278
ColdSutek, on 24 January 2019 - 05:02 PM, said: Dzieki za szybką odpowiedz parim1331.parim1331: Nie ma sprawy, w razie czego wysyłajcie do mnie PM'ki

Subject: Sytuacja z wczorajszej Kampani i pytanie do Falathiego
Link on message: #16585223
ColdSutek, on 24 January 2019 - 04:29 PM, said: Sytuacja z wczorajszej Kampani.
Przegralismy bitwe o 23:02, 15minut później mamy grać następną a w garażu nasze podstawowe czołgi poblokowane.
Wszyscy w klanie nie mieli srebra ,złota, wszystko zniknelo nam z kont,ewidentnie w jakiś magiczny sposób wysypala sie gra.
W zwiazku z tym że nie mogliśmy wziąść czołgów podstawowych następną bitwe,to wzięliśmy inne, niekoniecznie przydatne na tej mapie(mapa granica imperium).
I tak wyszło że campe przeciwnika składającą się z typkow5 ,mausow,e3 rozbijalismy między innymi batchatami ,fochem i is7(brak peny).Smutek po bitwie ogromny bo mielismy plan na rozbijanie kampy ale nie papierowymi czolgami. Oczywiście przegralismy, bo przy takim skladzie nasze szanse drastycznie zmalaly.
Jesteśmy dosyć malym klanem i każdy punkt jest dla nas na wage zlota.
Pytanie do Falathiego.
Czy wg wie o tym co sie stalo wczoraj z serwerami i co wg zamierza z zaistniałą sytuacją zrobić ?
Ps1.Pisze z telefonu,przeprsszam za skladnie. ps2.Napisalem to samo w dziale dotyczacym kampani, ale tam nikt nie zagląda .
Link on message: #16585223
ColdSutek, on 24 January 2019 - 04:29 PM, said: Sytuacja z wczorajszej Kampani.Przegralismy bitwe o 23:02, 15minut później mamy grać następną a w garażu nasze podstawowe czołgi poblokowane.
Wszyscy w klanie nie mieli srebra ,złota, wszystko zniknelo nam z kont,ewidentnie w jakiś magiczny sposób wysypala sie gra.
W zwiazku z tym że nie mogliśmy wziąść czołgów podstawowych następną bitwe,to wzięliśmy inne, niekoniecznie przydatne na tej mapie(mapa granica imperium).
I tak wyszło że campe przeciwnika składającą się z typkow5 ,mausow,e3 rozbijalismy między innymi batchatami ,fochem i is7(brak peny).Smutek po bitwie ogromny bo mielismy plan na rozbijanie kampy ale nie papierowymi czolgami. Oczywiście przegralismy, bo przy takim skladzie nasze szanse drastycznie zmalaly.
Jesteśmy dosyć malym klanem i każdy punkt jest dla nas na wage zlota.
Pytanie do Falathiego.
Czy wg wie o tym co sie stalo wczoraj z serwerami i co wg zamierza z zaistniałą sytuacją zrobić ?
Ps1.Pisze z telefonu,przeprsszam za skladnie. ps2.Napisalem to samo w dziale dotyczacym kampani, ale tam nikt nie zagląda .
parim1331: Z góry chciałbym Was przeprosić, że doświadczyliście takiego
rozczarowania z naszej strony, co więcej mam nadzieje, że coś
takiego się już nie powtórzy, ale do konkretów: Wszystkie kary oraz
strata punktów nałożone po godzinie 22 przez system kar zostały
cofnięte. Aktualnie staramy się oszacować skalę problemu oraz
strat, które powstały w jego wyniku.
Subject: Zamień stare na nowe!
Link on message: #16585054
Gilbert89, on 24 January 2019 - 03:38 PM, said: Witam, czy będę mógł wymienić Defendera na normalnego Object'a
252U?
Link on message: #16585054
Gilbert89, on 24 January 2019 - 03:38 PM, said: Witam, czy będę mógł wymienić Defendera na normalnego Object'a
252U?parim1331: Niestety aktualnie nie jest to możliwe. Pozdrawiam.
Subject: 50TP prototyp za darmo!?
Link on message: #16585029
Mscislav_sister, on 24 January 2019 - 03:22 PM, said: Po prostu bogactfo...
Znając wota to pewnie: Ensk, +2,
Typki 5, Godzilla i 430U, 3 minuty, 15:4 i garaż.xD A
jeszcze jak ktoś nie ma załogi to musi na tej gołej pojechać.xD
Link on message: #16585029
Mscislav_sister, on 24 January 2019 - 03:22 PM, said: Po prostu bogactfo...parim1331: Tak swoją drogą to właśnie też dzisiaj go dostałem na
jedną bitwe, rzuciło mnie na Minsk jako topke 
Subject: FV4202, el carro medio versátil
Link on message: #16584985
Link on message: #16584985
Delhroh: ¿Y el precio que os parece?
Subject: Soldados de Fortuna: Una actualización en la compensación
Link on message: #16584982
Link on message: #16584982
Delhroh: Saludos, Cuando tengamos más datos sobre los
incidentes y las acciones que tomaremos, las compartiré con
vosotros en el menor tiempo posible. Disculpad las molestias
que esto os haya podido causar.
Subject: ¡Cambiad lo viejo por lo nuevo!
Link on message: #16584944
rubensangriento, on 24 January 2019 - 07:54 AM, said: Lo que deberíais de hacer entre otras cosas, es bonificación extra
y día premium por la chapuza que hicisteis anoche bloqueando la
sincronización de las cuentas y haciéndonos perder dinero y tiempo
de juego. ¿Permutar?, querréis decir, vender vuestros tanques
premium a mitad de lo que habéis invertido y comprar uno
nuevo con esa mitad que os vamos a dar, como si fuera un tanque de
segunda mano vamos... Tanques que en su mayoría habéis ido
reventando como el KV5 y a mencionado aquí el compañero. Dar un
servicio de calidad por favor. ¡GRACIAS!
Link on message: #16584944
rubensangriento, on 24 January 2019 - 07:54 AM, said: Lo que deberíais de hacer entre otras cosas, es bonificación extra
y día premium por la chapuza que hicisteis anoche bloqueando la
sincronización de las cuentas y haciéndonos perder dinero y tiempo
de juego. ¿Permutar?, querréis decir, vender vuestros tanques
premium a mitad de lo que habéis invertido y comprar uno
nuevo con esa mitad que os vamos a dar, como si fuera un tanque de
segunda mano vamos... Tanques que en su mayoría habéis ido
reventando como el KV5 y a mencionado aquí el compañero. Dar un
servicio de calidad por favor. ¡GRACIAS!Delhroh: Hola, Sobre este tema, te ruego por favor que
escribas al departamento de soporte. Ellos podrán revisar tu cuenta
y darte una respuesta sobre este asunto. Disculpa las molestias y
acepta nuestras disculpas. Sobre el tema de las guerras de
clanes, nuestro equipo está revisando que fue lo que ocurrió.
Cuando tenga más noticias o información sobre alguna posible
compensación lo compartiré con vosotros. Sobre la
permuta: Recordad que es meramente opcional. Cualquiera puede
usarla o no. Un saludo. 14:44 Added after 5 minutes
Por favor, recordad se constructivos con vuestros comentarios, y
principalmente evitad los flames y no utilicéis lenguaje no
apropiado para evitar sanciones. Los mensjes que no
cumplían las normas han sido ocultados y moderación tomará las
medidas oportunas.
Subject: DelhRoh en tu TS
Link on message: #16584818
Pain_Killer_666, on 23 January 2019 - 07:51 PM, said: Hombre Delhroh, ni que decir tiene que estás invitado al Discord de la 10ª
División Fantasma.
Cuando yo escribo en mis mensajes que TODOS
estáis invitados a pasar a visitarnos, me estoy refiriendo a
absolutamente todos, tanto compañeros comandantes de carros de
combate, tengan ya Clan o no, como cualquier miembro del Alto Mando
de Wargaming.
Así que pásate cuando quieras, que
estaremos encantados de recibirte.
Yo suelo estar de lunes a
jueves desde las 19 horas hasta las 23 horas, más o menos y tampoco
es totalmente seguro. Por si quieres coincidir conmigo o por si
prefieres evitar al tío más plasta de todo el
WoT.
También te advierto que si te pasas y
nos echamos unas partidas juntos, luego no acepto reclamaciones por
caídas en picado de las estadísticas esas.
Saludos, Delhroh y a todo el
Estado Mayor de Wargaming, nos seguimos viendo en los foros,
espero que pronto en nuestro programa de comunicaciones y en los campos de
batalla. 
Link on message: #16584818
Pain_Killer_666, on 23 January 2019 - 07:51 PM, said: Hombre Delhroh, ni que decir tiene que estás invitado al Discord de la 10ª
División Fantasma. Delhroh: Gracias por la invitación. Por desgracia trabajo hasta las
19 horas, aunque un día, de haber mucha gente podría hacer una
excepción y hablar con vosotros de 19 a 20 horas. Coméntame por
privado que día de la semana que viene que no sea ni lunes ni
martes (otros compromisos)
.
Subject: Onkel Hardwares Kaffeeklatsch(en) :) 15-16Uhr, Kännchen nur drausen!
Link on message: #16584809
Link on message: #16584809
Jahrakajin: Es gibt Damen in diesem Forum!? 
Isa zählt nicht
Isa zählt nicht
Subject: 50TP prototyp za darmo!?
Link on message: #16584784
Link on message: #16584784
parim1331: Wygląda na to, że aktualnie wybrani gracze(losowo) dostają
wypożyczenie 50TP na okres jednej bitwy.
Subject: Zamień stare na nowe!
Link on message: #16584756
malutoros, on 24 January 2019 - 02:36 PM, said: Chyba by nic sie nie stalo,jak bys sie spytal szefow czy na
taki trade by poszli
sam jestem ciekaw...
Link on message: #16584756
malutoros, on 24 January 2019 - 02:36 PM, said: Chyba by nic sie nie stalo,jak bys sie spytal szefow czy na
taki trade by poszli parim1331: Wątpie, żeby to doszło do skutku, tak szczerze mówiąc.
Subject: ERRORI SERVER - No riparazioni e soldi scomparsi ...
Link on message: #16584741
Link on message: #16584741
Sael_: Ciao ragazzi. Mi dispiace molto per i problemi tecnici riscontrati
e tutto quello che hanno comportato. Come già spiegato dal collega
eekeeboo per la sezione anglofona, siamo ancora in fase di
assestamento danni, una volta che avremo raccolto tutti i dati
prenderemo i provvedimenti che riterremo necessari!
Subject: Słabe premki
Link on message: #16584720
Dionarch, on 24 January 2019 - 02:15 PM, said: Równie dobrze można kopiować tutaj wypowiedzi z części o pojazdach,
zamiast tego wpierw bym poczekał na zapowiadany rebalans pojazdów -
jeżeli nie będą się ociągać z X i polecą szybko na niższe
tiery.
Zacznijmy np. z takim CDCkiem i parę cytatów z tematu o nim (prosto z ostatniej strony/świeże wpisy): [....] ... było to wszystko wielokrotnie wałkowane co nie zmienia faktu, że wymienione przez autora czołgi zasługują na drugie życie, bo czas ich świetności w porównaniu do nowych drzewek/premek dawno minął.
Wymienionego wyżej wyciągam z czystego sentymentu i
chęci szkolenia załogi niż przyjemności grania.
Link on message: #16584720
Dionarch, on 24 January 2019 - 02:15 PM, said: Równie dobrze można kopiować tutaj wypowiedzi z części o pojazdach,
zamiast tego wpierw bym poczekał na zapowiadany rebalans pojazdów -
jeżeli nie będą się ociągać z X i polecą szybko na niższe
tiery. Zacznijmy np. z takim CDCkiem i parę cytatów z tematu o nim (prosto z ostatniej strony/świeże wpisy): [....] ... było to wszystko wielokrotnie wałkowane co nie zmienia faktu, że wymienione przez autora czołgi zasługują na drugie życie, bo czas ich świetności w porównaniu do nowych drzewek/premek dawno minął.
Falathi: I to jest właśnie konkretna opinia.
Nawiasem mówiąc, jako posiadacz CDC zgadzam się. To jest karton i nie sądzę żeby tu miało się cokolwiek zmienić. To szybko czołg - tutaj też jest OK. Ale to działo faktycznie mogłoby być nieco lepsze. A jak oceniacie Panter 8,8? To Pantera na VIII poziomie, więc wiadomo że na pancerz czy rewelacyjną wieżę lub hulldown nie ma co liczyć. Co można by zmienić?
59-Patton. No, to jest maszynka która dostała buffy ale nie widać tłumów na randomach. Ponownie: co Waszym zdaniem najmocniej dolega?
M46 - pytanie jw.
Żeby nie było: domyślam się, co jest nie tak, co można by poprawić ale chciałbym poznać Wasze opinie
Nawiasem mówiąc, jako posiadacz CDC zgadzam się. To jest karton i nie sądzę żeby tu miało się cokolwiek zmienić. To szybko czołg - tutaj też jest OK. Ale to działo faktycznie mogłoby być nieco lepsze. A jak oceniacie Panter 8,8? To Pantera na VIII poziomie, więc wiadomo że na pancerz czy rewelacyjną wieżę lub hulldown nie ma co liczyć. Co można by zmienić?
59-Patton. No, to jest maszynka która dostała buffy ale nie widać tłumów na randomach. Ponownie: co Waszym zdaniem najmocniej dolega?
M46 - pytanie jw.
Żeby nie było: domyślam się, co jest nie tak, co można by poprawić ale chciałbym poznać Wasze opinie
Реклама | Adv















