Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Hotchkiss EBR
Link on message: #16628459
Link on message: #16628459
Kayi4ek: Francouzské kolové vozidlo VII. úrovně. Informace o vozidle v tankopedii.
Subject: Panhard AMD 178B
Link on message: #16628457
Link on message: #16628457
Kayi4ek: Francouzské kolové vozidlo VI. úrovně. Informace o vozidle v tankopedii.
Subject: Update 1.4 Personal Mission changes
Link on message: #16628454
Scaf_the_ONE, on 06 February 2019 - 11:14 AM, said: why dont you rework some of the misions for obj 260 !? :\
some are practicaly imposible!! like TD15, HT15 and SPG15 i
personaly did them all mani times, but cant do it with
honors!! :\
Link on message: #16628454
Scaf_the_ONE, on 06 February 2019 - 11:14 AM, said: why dont you rework some of the misions for obj 260 !? :\
some are practicaly imposible!! like TD15, HT15 and SPG15 i
personaly did them all mani times, but cant do it with
honors!! :\eekeeboo: There are still changes made to these missions over
time.
Subject: Aktualizace 1.4 - Kolová vozidla
Link on message: #16628437
miso251, on 07 February 2019 - 02:14 PM, said: Pridaj k tomu: - odstranena jedina vyuzitelna
unikatna vlastnost - boost - chybajuce vlakna vo fore o technike
(pruvodce hrou - tanky)
Link on message: #16628437
miso251, on 07 February 2019 - 02:14 PM, said: Pridaj k tomu: - odstranena jedina vyuzitelna
unikatna vlastnost - boost - chybajuce vlakna vo fore o technike
(pruvodce hrou - tanky) Kayi4ek: První tam už je, druhou věc napravím
EDIT: Diskuse pro kolová
vozidla - http://forum.worldof...kolova-vozidla/
Subject: Aktualizace 1.4 - Všeobecná diskuse
Link on message: #16628434
Mannanan, on 07 February 2019 - 01:48 PM, said: Ohledně ekonomiku mohu poskytnout data jen z T6 za stejných
podmínek, přeberte si to jak chcete
Před patchem s Type64 39 bitev, výdělek 15238 na bitvu, WR 54%, wn8 2800+ Po patchi s Type64 53 bitev, výdělek 16180 na bitvu, WR 45%, wn8 2500+
Link on message: #16628434
Mannanan, on 07 February 2019 - 01:48 PM, said: Ohledně ekonomiku mohu poskytnout data jen z T6 za stejných
podmínek, přeberte si to jak chcetePřed patchem s Type64 39 bitev, výdělek 15238 na bitvu, WR 54%, wn8 2800+ Po patchi s Type64 53 bitev, výdělek 16180 na bitvu, WR 45%, wn8 2500+
Kayi4ek: Za stejných podmínek? Takže stejný MM, složení týmů, mapy,
hráči?
Subject: Aktualizace 1.4 - Kolová vozidla
Link on message: #16628414
Link on message: #16628414
Kayi4ek: Ahoj, děkuji všem za zpětnou vazbu, dnes jsem odeslal vaše první
reakce
Hodně ve zkratce:
Kolová vozidla do hry nezapadají Kolová vozidla negativně olivňují
hratelnost Servery jsou jimi přehlcené Jsou těžká/nezábavná na
hraní (hlavně nižší úrovně)
Subject: Hata Bildirim
Link on message: #16628395
ParlakTeNeKe, on 06 February 2019 - 06:50 PM, said: 1.4 Güncellemesi sonrası oyuna giriş yapılamıyor. rapor
klasörü doldu taştı.
ahm53, on 06 February 2019 - 07:25 PM, said: Arada bir maçlara giremiyorum.Oyuncuların isimlerinin listelendiği
bilgi ekranında donuyor.Kimlerin öldüğünü görebiliyorum fakat oyunu
kapatıp açsam da aynı sayfada kalıyor.Daha önce olmuyordu.
Link on message: #16628395
ParlakTeNeKe, on 06 February 2019 - 06:50 PM, said: 1.4 Güncellemesi sonrası oyuna giriş yapılamıyor. rapor
klasörü doldu taştı.vuque: İlgili hata raporlarıyla beraber müşteri hizmetlerine ticket
oluşturarak iletirseniz size ellerinden geldiğince teknik destek
vermeye çalışacaklardır!
ahm53, on 06 February 2019 - 07:25 PM, said: Arada bir maçlara giremiyorum.Oyuncuların isimlerinin listelendiği
bilgi ekranında donuyor.Kimlerin öldüğünü görebiliyorum fakat oyunu
kapatıp açsam da aynı sayfada kalıyor.Daha önce olmuyordu.vuque: Eski modlardan kaynaklanıyor olabilir, res mods
klasöründeki eski modları sildiğinizden emin olun lütfen! 
Subject: Update 1.4 Wheeled Vehicles
Link on message: #16628381
Sesrex, on 06 February 2019 - 07:03 PM, said: This is the best idea I have seen on this forum. In about 2
years from now, as per the usual reaction time, when you
decide to do something about this mistake then implement a tick box
like the one for non-historical elements.
Prowler_DK, on 06 February 2019 - 08:52 PM, said: OMG! What is next?! Electric bikes with smoke and granade launchers
??????? This games has nothing to do with tank warfare anymore. Why
not introduce drones ?! 20:55 Added after 3 minutes
lol - spot on! I just got circled in my Obj 416 with rear
turret that dosent go all the way round. 4 wheelies just raped me.
It was so funny. I instantly thought, "this is real tanking"! NOT!
What a crock! WG i thought you couldent [edited]the game up even
more - WAS I WRONG!
Tom_Deekanarry, on 06 February 2019 - 09:09 PM, said: WG can you please spend your time sorting out the unbalanced mess
we already have instead of introducing even more retarded vehicles
which ruin the game play!
TankofDave, on 06 February 2019 - 10:02 PM, said: ok wot bring in "Mario Carts" to the game but removed the T50-2
because it was too fast LMAO
Link on message: #16628381
Sesrex, on 06 February 2019 - 07:03 PM, said: This is the best idea I have seen on this forum. In about 2
years from now, as per the usual reaction time, when you
decide to do something about this mistake then implement a tick box
like the one for non-historical elements. eekeeboo: This will not happen, just like the suggestion "Tick for
non arty games" 13:08 Added after 7 minutes
Prowler_DK, on 06 February 2019 - 08:52 PM, said: OMG! What is next?! Electric bikes with smoke and granade launchers
??????? This games has nothing to do with tank warfare anymore. Why
not introduce drones ?! 20:55 Added after 3 minutes
lol - spot on! I just got circled in my Obj 416 with rear
turret that dosent go all the way round. 4 wheelies just raped me.
It was so funny. I instantly thought, "this is real tanking"! NOT!
What a crock! WG i thought you couldent [edited]the game up even
more - WAS I WRONG!eekeeboo: lol - spot on! I just got circled in my Obj 416 with rear
turret that dosent go all the way round. 4 wheelies just raped me.
It was so funny. I instantly thought, "this is real tanking"! NOT!
What a crock! WG i thought you couldent [edited]the game up even
more - WAS I WRONG! Because neither of those items were in
ww2 whereas wheeled and AFV were. Please be constructive or face a
banhammer! 13:10 Added after 9 minutes
Tom_Deekanarry, on 06 February 2019 - 09:09 PM, said: WG can you please spend your time sorting out the unbalanced mess
we already have instead of introducing even more retarded vehicles
which ruin the game play!eekeeboo: Part of the team working on this are and continue to
do so, the other part of the team who work on different parts of
the game are how lines like this are
released. 13:12 Added after 11 minutes
TankofDave, on 06 February 2019 - 10:02 PM, said: ok wot bring in "Mario Carts" to the game but removed the T50-2
because it was too fast LMAOeekeeboo: The T50-2 was removed when things like the old physics were
introduced.
Subject: Update 1.4 Wheeled Vehicles
Link on message: #16628343
sokolicc, on 06 February 2019 - 12:47 PM, said: Relax, i am pretty sure this Wheeled thing is going to be
rebalanced soon or it will be first rollback of content in WoT
history with apologize from WG team waiting us in garage.

They should, maybe, introduce british lights, for example... Maybee... Or work on EU/Israeli/Swiss line or finally do some thing that will either improve quality of game drastically or be creative on Gold ammo issue, but not to be "this" creative.
I don't know what to suggest to make wheeled tanks different than lights but not same, so i will say this is bullcrap, literaly. And we don't need any wheeled tanks in this game...
Game engine is not prepared for this, playerbase don't need this, it's not skilled and it's not even prepared. People struggle to aim on lights, ffs.
One more severe drop of active players like after 9.18, Bobject and 1.0 patch and WoT existance will be under question mark, mostly due to snowball effect. When people see playerbase is shrinking even more people will run away and playerbase will shrink more etc.(knocking down VB addict won't help you, WG). There's and american indian's saying "When you notice you ride dead horse first and best thing to do is to dismount".
Forzo, on 06 February 2019 - 01:46 PM, said: Completely idiotic line of "tanks"!
As I see it there are mainly three issues with them:
1. They require quite a bit of skill to play as intended. Skills that most that play them don't have, so they just suicide rush and kill arty. This leaves their team with a spotter less. 2. They don't really work well as spotters since they require active scouting and have really bad view range. But since they are light tanks the MM can match a wheeled one with a regular light on the opposite team. This can leave the team with the wheeled one quite crippled since their spotting is lacking.
3. They are insanely OP in a skilled players hand.
Please admit that you made a mistake and remove them. This is not what the game needs and this is not what players have requested.
It could possible work if they are made into a completely new class (wheeled tanks) and are restricted to maybe one or two per team.
Hammerhead20, on 06 February 2019 - 02:24 PM, said: Trash update as usual. Everyone now just rush in front and
suicide in these things like headless chickens... How can
this improve gameplay? You should better bring Frontline
mode as soon as possible...
91tibor, on 06 February 2019 - 02:44 PM, said: 1 more step closer to the grave of the game. When will u wg learn
from mistakes? overpowered prem tanks, Forcing players to play with
arty for pesonal missions, etc, and now little bugs runnings on
battlefield without brain, spoting up everything in 30s so no one
can take the position what they want. Whats next? Spaceships?
Teleport rings? Stargate? Start fixing the problems with the game,
fix the maps, give new maps. Stop pushing out new tanks. (LIKE
never existed polis tanks... Td gun, is7 turret and sconq gun
depression...)
Link on message: #16628343
sokolicc, on 06 February 2019 - 12:47 PM, said: Relax, i am pretty sure this Wheeled thing is going to be
rebalanced soon or it will be first rollback of content in WoT
history with apologize from WG team waiting us in garage.
They should, maybe, introduce british lights, for example... Maybee... Or work on EU/Israeli/Swiss line or finally do some thing that will either improve quality of game drastically or be creative on Gold ammo issue, but not to be "this" creative.
I don't know what to suggest to make wheeled tanks different than lights but not same, so i will say this is bullcrap, literaly. And we don't need any wheeled tanks in this game...
Game engine is not prepared for this, playerbase don't need this, it's not skilled and it's not even prepared. People struggle to aim on lights, ffs.
One more severe drop of active players like after 9.18, Bobject and 1.0 patch and WoT existance will be under question mark, mostly due to snowball effect. When people see playerbase is shrinking even more people will run away and playerbase will shrink more etc.(knocking down VB addict won't help you, WG). There's and american indian's saying "When you notice you ride dead horse first and best thing to do is to dismount".
eekeeboo: I don't know where to begin exactly but the part of
"knocking down VB".. What? Do you actually know of what you
speak or are you just making wild claims? That's a lie and
completely inaccurate. Every game loses players, this has been
explained and highlighted elsewhere and once more it's something
you should inform yourself on. 12:57 Added after 4
minutes
Forzo, on 06 February 2019 - 01:46 PM, said: Completely idiotic line of "tanks"!As I see it there are mainly three issues with them:
1. They require quite a bit of skill to play as intended. Skills that most that play them don't have, so they just suicide rush and kill arty. This leaves their team with a spotter less. 2. They don't really work well as spotters since they require active scouting and have really bad view range. But since they are light tanks the MM can match a wheeled one with a regular light on the opposite team. This can leave the team with the wheeled one quite crippled since their spotting is lacking.
3. They are insanely OP in a skilled players hand.
Please admit that you made a mistake and remove them. This is not what the game needs and this is not what players have requested.
It could possible work if they are made into a completely new class (wheeled tanks) and are restricted to maybe one or two per team.
eekeeboo: Is it a mistake to introduce a vehicle that performs well in
skilled hands and poorly in unskilled hands?
Hammerhead20, on 06 February 2019 - 02:24 PM, said: Trash update as usual. Everyone now just rush in front and
suicide in these things like headless chickens... How can
this improve gameplay? You should better bring Frontline
mode as soon as possible... eekeeboo: People did this before WV.
91tibor, on 06 February 2019 - 02:44 PM, said: 1 more step closer to the grave of the game. When will u wg learn
from mistakes? overpowered prem tanks, Forcing players to play with
arty for pesonal missions, etc, and now little bugs runnings on
battlefield without brain, spoting up everything in 30s so no one
can take the position what they want. Whats next? Spaceships?
Teleport rings? Stargate? Start fixing the problems with the game,
fix the maps, give new maps. Stop pushing out new tanks. (LIKE
never existed polis tanks... Td gun, is7 turret and sconq gun
depression...)eekeeboo: And without new tanks and new content to engage players who
have everything and actively providing no content for people to
purchase means the money you need to pay people to do things like
maps (worked on by a completely different team) also disappears.
There's a difference between not liking something and unrealistic
expectations of game development.
Subject: Aktualizace 1.4 - Změny osobních misí
Link on message: #16628292
Gopher13, on 07 February 2019 - 09:45 AM, said: Otázečka. Poradí mi někdo kam zmizel po aktualizaci na 1.4 můj
rekrut i se skoro splněným úkolem a tudíž i odměnou za tento
úkol? Podotýkám, že nikde a nikdy nebylo splnění omezeno jakýmkoliv
časovým horizontem či jinou podmínkou.
Link on message: #16628292
Gopher13, on 07 February 2019 - 09:45 AM, said: Otázečka. Poradí mi někdo kam zmizel po aktualizaci na 1.4 můj
rekrut i se skoro splněným úkolem a tudíž i odměnou za tento
úkol? Podotýkám, že nikde a nikdy nebylo splnění omezeno jakýmkoliv
časovým horizontem či jinou podmínkou.Kayi4ek: Ahoj, o ukončení starého programu jsme
informovali na portále - https://worldoftanks...l-programm-end/
Subject: What Chinese Vehicles To Go For?
Link on message: #16628291
Geno1isme, on 07 February 2019 - 08:13 AM, said: You realize that's the T9, right? (can't blame you, the
naming scheme of the T8+9 techtree and premiums is pretty retarded)
Link on message: #16628291
Geno1isme, on 07 February 2019 - 08:13 AM, said: You realize that's the T9, right? (can't blame you, the
naming scheme of the T8+9 techtree and premiums is pretty retarded)eekeeboo: Apologies, i did, in fact, link the wrong one! just
finding the closest armour layout I could, fixed it for you.
Unfortunately the only picture to get there and you can see the
layout.
Subject: Wargaming- wiarygodność
Link on message: #16628290
MFCpl, on 07 February 2019 - 12:50 PM, said: Hej, od dwóch dni próbuje zdobyć informacje od Wargaming jak
to jest że gracz, jest karany dwa razy za to samo wykroczenie? 5
lutego otrzymałem ban za niepoprawne zachowanie na czat, ze
skutkiem natychmiastowym. Co w praktyce oznacza wyłączeniem
komunikacji, przez chat na określony czas ( w tym przypadku do
Niedzieli). Bardzo zdziwiłem się kiedy dzień później (6
luty) otrzymuje ponownie mail o czasowym wyłączeniu chat z powodu
niewłaściwego zachowania. Kolejne dwa dni dłużej. Nie mogłem
drugi raz zostać ukarany za niewłaściwie zachowanie na chat skoro
ten był wyłączony ?!?!? Co skłania mnie do wyciągniecia wniosków,
że dostałem ban za to samo dwa razy. Takie zachowanie Wargaming to
już nie jest postępowanie zgodne z jakimkolwiek ich regulaminem.
Nigdzie w regulaminie nie ma informacji, że mogę być dwukrotnie
ukarany za to samo. Co wiecej takie postępowanie Wargaming, burzy
ich wiarygodność jako firmy, która stosuje sie do jakiegokolwiek
prawa. Nie jestem prawnikiem ale zakładam sie że wiekszość krajów
(przynajmniej w Europie) zakazuje stosowania podwójnej kary za to
samo wykroczenie. Na koniec dodam, że nie uchylam sie od
odpowiedzialności, rozumiem za co dostałem ban i akceptuje (nie
jestem święty). Nie zgadzam sie jednak na dwókrotne karanie za to
samo albo ukaranie za coś czego nie mogłem zrobić pomiędzy 5 a 6
lutego. 

Link on message: #16628290
MFCpl, on 07 February 2019 - 12:50 PM, said: Hej, od dwóch dni próbuje zdobyć informacje od Wargaming jak
to jest że gracz, jest karany dwa razy za to samo wykroczenie? 5
lutego otrzymałem ban za niepoprawne zachowanie na czat, ze
skutkiem natychmiastowym. Co w praktyce oznacza wyłączeniem
komunikacji, przez chat na określony czas ( w tym przypadku do
Niedzieli). Bardzo zdziwiłem się kiedy dzień później (6
luty) otrzymuje ponownie mail o czasowym wyłączeniu chat z powodu
niewłaściwego zachowania. Kolejne dwa dni dłużej. Nie mogłem
drugi raz zostać ukarany za niewłaściwie zachowanie na chat skoro
ten był wyłączony ?!?!? Co skłania mnie do wyciągniecia wniosków,
że dostałem ban za to samo dwa razy. Takie zachowanie Wargaming to
już nie jest postępowanie zgodne z jakimkolwiek ich regulaminem.
Nigdzie w regulaminie nie ma informacji, że mogę być dwukrotnie
ukarany za to samo. Co wiecej takie postępowanie Wargaming, burzy
ich wiarygodność jako firmy, która stosuje sie do jakiegokolwiek
prawa. Nie jestem prawnikiem ale zakładam sie że wiekszość krajów
(przynajmniej w Europie) zakazuje stosowania podwójnej kary za to
samo wykroczenie. Na koniec dodam, że nie uchylam sie od
odpowiedzialności, rozumiem za co dostałem ban i akceptuje (nie
jestem święty). Nie zgadzam sie jednak na dwókrotne karanie za to
samo albo ukaranie za coś czego nie mogłem zrobić pomiędzy 5 a 6
lutego. parim1331: Witaj, Próbowałeś się kontaktować z
Supportem w tej sprawie?
Subject: Retours concernant les véhicules à roues!
Link on message: #16628268
Crazy_Joker02, on 06 February 2019 - 07:13 PM, said: V pour cinq, pourtant, on est plus au temps des Romains...
J'ai juste envie de te titiller un peu actinid. 
bourdonnais, on 07 February 2019 - 07:24 AM, said: Comment faire pour avoir les trois premiers jetons "sceau de fer"
et commencer les missions avec ces chars?
Link on message: #16628268
Crazy_Joker02, on 06 February 2019 - 07:13 PM, said: V pour cinq, pourtant, on est plus au temps des Romains...
J'ai juste envie de te titiller un peu actinid. Actinid: J'ai corrigé le titre merci. Et merci pour vos
retours.
bourdonnais, on 07 February 2019 - 07:24 AM, said: Comment faire pour avoir les trois premiers jetons "sceau de fer"
et commencer les missions avec ces chars? Actinid: Tu as le détail des missions ici :
Subject: Aktualizace 1.4 - Všeobecná diskuse
Link on message: #16628260
richardoRici, on 06 February 2019 - 12:08 PM, said: Také mi to píše že budou nenaverbovaní členové budou odstraněni.
Prosím o relevantní info. Nevěřím že by nás pan Kayi4ek úmyslně uvedl v omyl, že posádky budou k
dispozici i v aktualizaci 1.4. Nebo že by zas jeden z triků WG?
Budou, ale jen po neupřesněnou dobu, tím pan Kayi4ek splní
své vyjádření. WG je mistr v manipulaci se slovy a vyjádřeními. O
tom jsme se již častokrát přesvědčili. I psané slovo si dokáží
přizpůsobit dle svých potřeb. Takže žádám o relevantní, závazné a
přesné vyjádření jak to s posádkami bude. Také nevidím tanky
za bony jak WG psalo. Že by další …… Děkuji za Info.
Link on message: #16628260
richardoRici, on 06 February 2019 - 12:08 PM, said: Také mi to píše že budou nenaverbovaní členové budou odstraněni.
Prosím o relevantní info. Nevěřím že by nás pan Kayi4ek úmyslně uvedl v omyl, že posádky budou k
dispozici i v aktualizaci 1.4. Nebo že by zas jeden z triků WG?
Budou, ale jen po neupřesněnou dobu, tím pan Kayi4ek splní
své vyjádření. WG je mistr v manipulaci se slovy a vyjádřeními. O
tom jsme se již častokrát přesvědčili. I psané slovo si dokáží
přizpůsobit dle svých potřeb. Takže žádám o relevantní, závazné a
přesné vyjádření jak to s posádkami bude. Také nevidím tanky
za bony jak WG psalo. Že by další …… Děkuji za Info.Kayi4ek: Ahoj, jedná se o chybu v popisku. O svoje posádky se
nemusíte bát 
Subject: Retours concernant les bugs 1.4
Link on message: #16628251
iFlirius, on 06 February 2019 - 08:18 PM, said: Problème lié à Orange, pas à WG.
Link on message: #16628251
iFlirius, on 06 February 2019 - 08:18 PM, said: Problème lié à Orange, pas à WG.Actinid: Salut, Je confirme le soucis ne venait pas de chez
nous mais de votre FAI. Merci pour vos retours =) !
Subject: Aktualizace 1.4 - Hlášení chyb
Link on message: #16628248
Binford80, on 07 February 2019 - 01:16 PM, said: Kájo, neřeknu ti přesně, ale kolem 22hod to bylo.
Link on message: #16628248
Binford80, on 07 February 2019 - 01:16 PM, said: Kájo, neřeknu ti přesně, ale kolem 22hod to bylo.Kayi4ek: Někteří poskytovatelé měli v tomto čase problémy s
připojením. Mě se stalo to samé s WoT a s Originem.
Subject: Pedal to the Metal Event
Link on message: #16628229
MyIQ_1, on 06 February 2019 - 07:29 PM, said: May be because they are not Tanks
dotns, on 06 February 2019 - 07:38 PM, said: AM39 Gendron-Somua - tier II ??? .... eekeeboo....gift tank or what
???
Berto72, on 06 February 2019 - 07:52 PM, said: if this is the best answer to convince us to grid a
line.... WoW !
zakktell, on 07 February 2019 - 06:49 AM, said: I don't care about all this.When can we buy the premium tank?I
don't want to win it with a contest or with streaming giveaways.I
just want to spend my hard earned cash on it.So when can credit
card warriors have it with out all the hassle?I don't care about if
bundled or not.
raketak_, on 07 February 2019 - 07:18 AM, said: hello Eekeeboo this "black widow" style for
mission is exact as on your picture? Because standart "black
widow" style is normal camo without skull and rest of extra
stuff. http://cdn-frm-eu.wa...-1549446408.jpg
Cobra6, on 07 February 2019 - 07:19 AM, said: Why is the picture contest linked to Instagram or Twitter, there
are more then enough people who stay away from these services for
good reason. Make sure contests like these include an email
address to send entries to like they did years ago for every
contest. Missions are very nice, I'll certainly be playing
these wheeled vehicles a bit. Cobra 6
Link on message: #16628229
MyIQ_1, on 06 February 2019 - 07:29 PM, said: May be because they are not Tankseekeeboo: They're a combat vehicle still.
dotns, on 06 February 2019 - 07:38 PM, said: AM39 Gendron-Somua - tier II ??? .... eekeeboo....gift tank or what
???eekeeboo: What do you mean sorry?
Berto72, on 06 February 2019 - 07:52 PM, said: if this is the best answer to convince us to grid a
line.... WoW !eekeeboo: It's not meant to convince you, I'm not here to hold your
hand and tell you why you should do something. If a person wants to
ask a question "Why do we need wheeled vehicles?", simply put, why
not? Why is having different play styles and vehicle bad? Why is
trying new things bad? Why is it that change has to be met so
negatively by people with no consideration at all for the game or
the people around them who also play but only their
self-interest. That is why "Why not?", because having
to explain this, should not be a requirement. 12:26 Added
after 1 minute
zakktell, on 07 February 2019 - 06:49 AM, said: I don't care about all this.When can we buy the premium tank?I
don't want to win it with a contest or with streaming giveaways.I
just want to spend my hard earned cash on it.So when can credit
card warriors have it with out all the hassle?I don't care about if
bundled or not.eekeeboo: An announcement will be made soon. 12:27 Added after 2
minutes
raketak_, on 07 February 2019 - 07:18 AM, said: hello Eekeeboo this "black widow" style for
mission is exact as on your picture? Because standart "black
widow" style is normal camo without skull and rest of extra
stuff. http://cdn-frm-eu.wa...-1549446408.jpg eekeeboo: It's not a black widow style, hopefully this should clear up
some confusion. 12:27 Added after 3 minutes
Cobra6, on 07 February 2019 - 07:19 AM, said: Why is the picture contest linked to Instagram or Twitter, there
are more then enough people who stay away from these services for
good reason. Make sure contests like these include an email
address to send entries to like they did years ago for every
contest. Missions are very nice, I'll certainly be playing
these wheeled vehicles a bit. Cobra 6eekeeboo: It's one of the best social platforms to allow community
engagement and sharing with people who may be players already but
those who aren't for things like your friend's list, while being
the simplest and easiest way to do this with the tools already in
place.
Subject: Easy Tier VI Tanks You Should Go For
Link on message: #16628220
aiphos, on 07 February 2019 - 12:04 PM, said: Hi! I didn't really get it. Can I do it even if I am not a
new player? And if yes, what should I do? Should I complete the
tutorial again? Thanks for your answers!
Link on message: #16628220
aiphos, on 07 February 2019 - 12:04 PM, said: Hi! I didn't really get it. Can I do it even if I am not a
new player? And if yes, what should I do? Should I complete the
tutorial again? Thanks for your answers!eekeeboo: If you haven't done the tutorial, you can still do the
tutorial.
Subject: The Soldiers of Fortune join the Global Map
Link on message: #16628197
Rilleta, on 06 February 2019 - 08:53 PM, said: It's fine! As Quaksen stated, I missed what was already
written in the page. Thank you for your answer and sorry for the
trouble.
MarkyMark_666, on 07 February 2019 - 12:03 PM, said: Stupid question, but do you choose a tank then make a bid, or are
you bidding for any one of the reward tanks? Its not terribly clear
on the auction page.
Link on message: #16628197
Rilleta, on 06 February 2019 - 08:53 PM, said: It's fine! As Quaksen stated, I missed what was already
written in the page. Thank you for your answer and sorry for the
trouble.eekeeboo: That's fine, I understand how easy it is to miss things,
downside to giving these answers in so many different threads that
it can feel I'm repeating myself far more frequently than I
actually am too! 12:15 Added after 0 minutes
MarkyMark_666, on 07 February 2019 - 12:03 PM, said: Stupid question, but do you choose a tank then make a bid, or are
you bidding for any one of the reward tanks? Its not terribly clear
on the auction page.eekeeboo: Open the reward exchange (orange button) then it's all self
explanatory when you select the vehicles.
Subject: Wheeled Vehicles: Take Them for a Spin!
Link on message: #16628165
Saar_Lion, on 06 February 2019 - 08:05 PM, said: They existed operationally for a short while in relatively
small numbers. Nobody ever argued that they didn't.
Three questions for you: Why doesn't the ammunition conform
to reality? (I've even given you the report so you can check for
yourself) Why doesn't the maximum speed conform to reality?
Why are they in the game if they are provably nothing like
reality?
Link on message: #16628165
Saar_Lion, on 06 February 2019 - 08:05 PM, said: They existed operationally for a short while in relatively
small numbers. Nobody ever argued that they didn't.
Three questions for you: Why doesn't the ammunition conform
to reality? (I've even given you the report so you can check for
yourself) Why doesn't the maximum speed conform to reality?
Why are they in the game if they are provably nothing like
reality? eekeeboo: Actually, people said they didn't exist and are completely
made up and have no place on the battlefield, but the M8 Greyhound
who took out a Tiger tank alone would like to disagree.
1) It's an arcade game with required balance, it's not a
simulation/simulator. 2) Refer above. 3) Refer
above.
Subject: Referral Program 2.0: The Finishing Touches
Link on message: #16628149
CrystyB, on 06 February 2019 - 09:45 PM, said: That's the best case scenario: you probably can recruit them with
no delay. :-) That is, unless they have a very strange meaning
behind that "have not completed any Recruit Contracts"... Like if
just being part of the old system would count as completing an RC.
Which would be really uncool. I think that old behaviour was
because in Recruiting 1.0 any login counted as activity. The way i
read the rules for v2.0 only fighting a battle will now count, so
you should be good. Except those 60 days were counted from
an absurdly old cut-off date... Thankfully, they apparently fixed
that silly restriction now. That's actually your (WG's)
call... There was the option of not trashing the old system and
have them in parallel (with the obvious restriction that an account
can only use one of them. To join v2.0 the player would have to
actively request losing all progress in v1.0), but why make things
convenient when you can just bulldoze the existing effort? -.-
Can eekeeboo please answer that second part? The old 1.0
rules forbade someone from being both a recruit and later a
commander, iirc, but the new rules would suggest this is now
allowed. Can we get an answer for this? My question about
this note, though, is "HOW LONG will the recruit benefit from that
bonus?" :-D
1. That phrasing was... unrefined, to put it mildly. I've have to read it like 3 times over, and i still am not sure i got what you were trying to say. Did you maybe mean that the Т95Е2 owners can also benefit from the new program, so there's no reason to bring their old reward up to the current par?
2. What do you mean, "completed in the season"?! Do the RPs have to be collected within the 4 months, otherwise the "contract" will be automatically cancelled?! o.O
3. Okay, i can maybe give you the benefit of the doubt here and accept that it would be too complicated and difficult. But then who thought it was a good idea to completely scrap the old program? :-\ Also, i would ask if having been a commander or a recruit in v1.0 would count for these points... :-s And indeed, that last point would make sense. Hope they accept the idea. The wording in the rules would suggest that such a thing is possible. What seems to be restricted is for the same account to be a recruit multiple times, or for someone to be a commander and afterwards to go inactive and then be recruited.
jovana83, on 06 February 2019 - 10:05 PM, said: any1 know is it possible to end contract, and if it is posiblle
how?
bim_bam_bo0m, on 07 February 2019 - 06:40 AM, said: Hello WG I need help. How
can i get the link only of FACEBOOK ??? or there is another way.
Where to clik to generate link?? Im i doing somethink wrong
?
Link on message: #16628149
CrystyB, on 06 February 2019 - 09:45 PM, said: That's the best case scenario: you probably can recruit them with
no delay. :-) That is, unless they have a very strange meaning
behind that "have not completed any Recruit Contracts"... Like if
just being part of the old system would count as completing an RC.
Which would be really uncool. I think that old behaviour was
because in Recruiting 1.0 any login counted as activity. The way i
read the rules for v2.0 only fighting a battle will now count, so
you should be good. Except those 60 days were counted from
an absurdly old cut-off date... Thankfully, they apparently fixed
that silly restriction now. That's actually your (WG's)
call... There was the option of not trashing the old system and
have them in parallel (with the obvious restriction that an account
can only use one of them. To join v2.0 the player would have to
actively request losing all progress in v1.0), but why make things
convenient when you can just bulldoze the existing effort? -.-
Can eekeeboo please answer that second part? The old 1.0
rules forbade someone from being both a recruit and later a
commander, iirc, but the new rules would suggest this is now
allowed. Can we get an answer for this? My question about
this note, though, is "HOW LONG will the recruit benefit from that
bonus?" :-D1. That phrasing was... unrefined, to put it mildly. I've have to read it like 3 times over, and i still am not sure i got what you were trying to say. Did you maybe mean that the Т95Е2 owners can also benefit from the new program, so there's no reason to bring their old reward up to the current par?
2. What do you mean, "completed in the season"?! Do the RPs have to be collected within the 4 months, otherwise the "contract" will be automatically cancelled?! o.O
3. Okay, i can maybe give you the benefit of the doubt here and accept that it would be too complicated and difficult. But then who thought it was a good idea to completely scrap the old program? :-\ Also, i would ask if having been a commander or a recruit in v1.0 would count for these points... :-s And indeed, that last point would make sense. Hope they accept the idea. The wording in the rules would suggest that such a thing is possible. What seems to be restricted is for the same account to be a recruit multiple times, or for someone to be a commander and afterwards to go inactive and then be recruited.
eekeeboo: If your old program has a stagnated progress and is
not being used, then it is no longer fit for purpose, if everyone
has the T95E2, people have no desire to have a new recruit, vs the
chance to pick your own premium from a pool of tanks that will
change for each season. The two systems work VERY
differently and cannot co-exist at all. It was highlighted
many times, the old program is dead, it will not have any carry
over to the new program at all. The owners of the
T95E2 are eligble to recruit new players just as they were
previously, the buffing of the tank has nothing to do with the
program at all, in any way. You're able to answer many
of your own questions by reading the complete documentation and
text in the game. The program runs in seasons where a person's
status will be reset at the end of a season and things start again,
this is mentioned in game and should highlight a person earns a
tank as a recruit, becomes an experienced tanker, when the season
ends, is able to recruit someone new when the next season
starts. 12:03 Added after 0 minutes
jovana83, on 06 February 2019 - 10:05 PM, said: any1 know is it possible to end contract, and if it is posiblle
how? eekeeboo: What contract? 12:05 Added after 2 minutes
bim_bam_bo0m, on 07 February 2019 - 06:40 AM, said: Hello WG I need help. How
can i get the link only of FACEBOOK ??? or there is another way.
Where to clik to generate link?? Im i doing somethink wrong
? eekeeboo: There a Facebook button, Twitter button and a copy link
button.
Subject: Referral Program 2.0: The Finishing Touches
Link on message: #16628069
astur1x, on 06 February 2019 - 07:12 PM, said:
4. "Player has never
been and is not a Commander at the moment" And my
question is... i had 1 recruit in 1.0 program and i already have in
my garage the T95E2... so, now in 2.0 program, can i stop for 60
days to be a recruit?? or i will never can be a recruit at this
point?? Thx
SDST, on 06 February 2019 - 07:26 PM, said: Not working any more.... maybe look into the problems before make
the options live would be a nice thing
Its_A_Me_Noob, on 06 February 2019 - 07:44 PM, said: If I invite a player that hasn't played for 60 days and he becomes
my recruit and we get the premium rewards, will he ever be able to
become a commander? Or once you are a recruit you will be a recruit
for ever?
Link on message: #16628069
astur1x, on 06 February 2019 - 07:12 PM, said:
4. "Player has never
been and is not a Commander at the moment" And my
question is... i had 1 recruit in 1.0 program and i already have in
my garage the T95E2... so, now in 2.0 program, can i stop for 60
days to be a recruit?? or i will never can be a recruit at this
point?? Thx eekeeboo: you could technically be a recruit after a prolonged
absence. 11:40 Added after 1 minute
SDST, on 06 February 2019 - 07:26 PM, said: Not working any more.... maybe look into the problems before make
the options live would be a nice thingeekeeboo: Which part is not working anymore and did you submit a
ticket? 11:42 Added after 2 minutes
Its_A_Me_Noob, on 06 February 2019 - 07:44 PM, said: If I invite a player that hasn't played for 60 days and he becomes
my recruit and we get the premium rewards, will he ever be able to
become a commander? Or once you are a recruit you will be a recruit
for ever?eekeeboo: That person will be able to become a recruiter eventually.
There are seasons to also take into account.
Subject: Enjoy the Year of the Pig with this Bundle
Link on message: #16628063
Homer_J, on 06 February 2019 - 07:49 PM, said: If I go to the WoWP shop then 360 days of premium is £68.78 - the
normal price and the price I would have paid in the WoT shop
without the bundle/discount. If I go to the WoT shop then
360 days of premium is £111.47 with a 38% discount bringing it down
to £68.78 but it has 2 tanks bundled with it which I don't get if I
already own them. Shady at best. If a certain well
known furniture shop had a sofa on sale for £750 then the next day
had it on sale with a free fridge worth £250 and called it a 25%
discount (and then in the small print said you don't get the fridge
if you already have one) then I don't think they would get away
with it. Quote It is questionable as a business to start
compensating the free items in a discount. I agree, and I don't
have a problem with that. What I have a problem with is
adding the value of those free items on to the bundle and calling
it a discount. It's either a free gift or a discount, it
cannot be both. It's quite easily solved, remove the -38%
tag. Interestingly the 30 days of premium and free LTP is
not advertised as a discount, and that one is the same price as 30
days of premium with no LTP. At least be consistent.
Quote It is questionable as a business to start compensating the free items in a discount.
Link on message: #16628063
Homer_J, on 06 February 2019 - 07:49 PM, said: If I go to the WoWP shop then 360 days of premium is £68.78 - the
normal price and the price I would have paid in the WoT shop
without the bundle/discount. If I go to the WoT shop then
360 days of premium is £111.47 with a 38% discount bringing it down
to £68.78 but it has 2 tanks bundled with it which I don't get if I
already own them. Shady at best. If a certain well
known furniture shop had a sofa on sale for £750 then the next day
had it on sale with a free fridge worth £250 and called it a 25%
discount (and then in the small print said you don't get the fridge
if you already have one) then I don't think they would get away
with it. Quote It is questionable as a business to start
compensating the free items in a discount. I agree, and I don't
have a problem with that. What I have a problem with is
adding the value of those free items on to the bundle and calling
it a discount. It's either a free gift or a discount, it
cannot be both. It's quite easily solved, remove the -38%
tag. Interestingly the 30 days of premium and free LTP is
not advertised as a discount, and that one is the same price as 30
days of premium with no LTP. At least be consistent.eekeeboo: I agree, and I don't have a problem with that. What I have a
problem with is adding the value of those free items on to the
bundle and calling it a discount. It's either a free gift or
a discount, it cannot be both. It's quite easily solved,
remove the -38% tag. Interestingly the 30 days of premium
and free LTP is not advertised as a discount, and that one is the
same price as 30 days of premium with no LTP. At least be
consistent. It may be "shady" but at the same time. But the
discount is the same, only that you do not receive full
compensation for something that is purely for free. For instance,
you still receive crew and garage slot etc, And for
the shop doing this... it has been done in the past
Not with a fridge though.
Consistency has been suggested and we have to wait for
future offers to not have this problem and it would have been
better to say "Buy this now and get these free" but even then
people would still want for the free bits to be compensated but
with less confusion.
Quote It is questionable as a business to start compensating the free items in a discount.
eekeeboo:
Subject: Soldiers of Fortune: An Update on Compensation
Link on message: #16628042
____Green____, on 06 February 2019 - 07:52 PM, said: Ok, rules is rules but I asked my Q here before send msg to
support, I still dont have answer here and even support send me
back to forum to ask here. So as WG official You offer
to me read rules, ok I will. Also I read patchnotes, Rules and
regulations for events. So and I will ask xxxxxxx time:
Patch 9.3 was added reservist rank with two permissions:
*Participate in Clan Wars battles *Organize and participate in
Skirmishes Permission to select players in battle room start only
if player gets recruit rank. So as You can read on my story few
posts above - we got issue during this campaign and this issue
leaved two my clanmates right below redline of prizes. I dont ask
for compensation or apologies. Just provide me information
(patch note, official announcement on website etc) when and why
reservist permissions was changed and why on event "SoF" rule 13.3.
is in conflict with the options available in the game/ Tnx
You!
Link on message: #16628042
____Green____, on 06 February 2019 - 07:52 PM, said: Ok, rules is rules but I asked my Q here before send msg to
support, I still dont have answer here and even support send me
back to forum to ask here. So as WG official You offer
to me read rules, ok I will. Also I read patchnotes, Rules and
regulations for events. So and I will ask xxxxxxx time:
Patch 9.3 was added reservist rank with two permissions:
*Participate in Clan Wars battles *Organize and participate in
Skirmishes Permission to select players in battle room start only
if player gets recruit rank. So as You can read on my story few
posts above - we got issue during this campaign and this issue
leaved two my clanmates right below redline of prizes. I dont ask
for compensation or apologies. Just provide me information
(patch note, official announcement on website etc) when and why
reservist permissions was changed and why on event "SoF" rule 13.3.
is in conflict with the options available in the game/ Tnx
You! eekeeboo: And no matter how many times you ask the question, it
will not affect the speed of the answer. Furthermore
for the answer you ask, I have performed a google search myself to
check the answers you can receive yourself, here are the first
results: one, That's why. As to how, having
someone in your clan who does this I imagine would be a good step
towards kicking that person from the clan no?
Subject: Aktualizace 1.4 - Hlášení chyb
Link on message: #16627970
pumicka2, on 06 February 2019 - 10:48 AM, said: Dobrý Den Wg dnes se lognu na učet a na jednou mam z 13 480 bonu
pouze 12780 a misto 45 000volych zk mam jen 25000volný a to jsme
nic nezkoumal ani nic nekupoval za body a kamošovi se stalo to
stejne Děkuji zavisvětleni
strelo28, on 06 February 2019 - 06:39 PM, said: Dobrý deň. Po najnovšej aktualizácii mi tanky aj keď dám cúvať idú
stále dopredu. Zastavia kedy chcú a až potom sa dá cúvať. Potom
ešte nabíja náboje ako chce keď to chcem prepnúť tak to nejde.
Heimdall_defender, on 07 February 2019 - 11:53 AM, said: Dnes (7. 2. 2019) ráno, po té co jsem si vybral odměny za CW,
mi z vozidel zmizely další binokuláry. Před aktualizací 1.4 jsem
měl cca 10 binokulárů, teď mám jen 4.
Binford80, on 07 February 2019 - 11:18 AM, said: Nevím, jestli to souvisí z aktualizací. Včera na Dubovém lesíku se
dokončil odpočet a všichni jsme stáli. Za cca 20 vteřin návrat do
garáže a tam červená hláška "BASEAPP CRASH", hra je bez modů.
Link on message: #16627970
pumicka2, on 06 February 2019 - 10:48 AM, said: Dobrý Den Wg dnes se lognu na učet a na jednou mam z 13 480 bonu
pouze 12780 a misto 45 000volych zk mam jen 25000volný a to jsme
nic nezkoumal ani nic nekupoval za body a kamošovi se stalo to
stejne Děkuji zavisvětleniKayi4ek: Ahoj, napiš na zákaznickou podporu - ODKAZ.
strelo28, on 06 February 2019 - 06:39 PM, said: Dobrý deň. Po najnovšej aktualizácii mi tanky aj keď dám cúvať idú
stále dopredu. Zastavia kedy chcú a až potom sa dá cúvať. Potom
ešte nabíja náboje ako chce keď to chcem prepnúť tak to nejde.Kayi4ek: Ahoj, zkontroluj, jeslti si někdo nepohrál s
nastavením ovládání a zkus ho vyresetovat.
Heimdall_defender, on 07 February 2019 - 11:53 AM, said: Dnes (7. 2. 2019) ráno, po té co jsem si vybral odměny za CW,
mi z vozidel zmizely další binokuláry. Před aktualizací 1.4 jsem
měl cca 10 binokulárů, teď mám jen 4.Kayi4ek: Ahoj, pokud it něco zmizelo, napiš na zákaznickou
podporu - ODKAZ.
Binford80, on 07 February 2019 - 11:18 AM, said: Nevím, jestli to souvisí z aktualizací. Včera na Dubovém lesíku se
dokončil odpočet a všichni jsme stáli. Za cca 20 vteřin návrat do
garáže a tam červená hláška "BASEAPP CRASH", hra je bez modů.Kayi4ek: Ahoj, stalo se to někdy kolem 8-10 hodiny?
Subject: Diskuze - Sstyxina informuje
Link on message: #16627821
Flay48, on 07 February 2019 - 09:32 AM, said: Nazdárek, budu se účastnit aukce na licenci a chtěl bych se
zeptat. Je nutné, abych setrval v aktuálním klanu do ukončení
aukce? nebo můžu přihodit do aukce a pak se přesunout jinam? Nedaří
se mi to nikde dohledat. díky a fajn den
Link on message: #16627821
Flay48, on 07 February 2019 - 09:32 AM, said: Nazdárek, budu se účastnit aukce na licenci a chtěl bych se
zeptat. Je nutné, abych setrval v aktuálním klanu do ukončení
aukce? nebo můžu přihodit do aukce a pak se přesunout jinam? Nedaří
se mi to nikde dohledat. díky a fajn denKayi4ek:
Odpověď: http://forum.worldof...8#entry16627818
Odpověď: http://forum.worldof...8#entry16627818
Subject: Vojáci štěstěny na Globální mapu
Link on message: #16627818
Jmeno1, on 07 February 2019 - 11:22 AM, said: Kayi4ku, je skutečně Obj. 907 k mání napsoledy a nebo je to jen
fáma. Mne jen zajímá, jestli mám dát bony všechny a nebo si počkat
na příště a snažit se dostat mezi těch horních 10.000. Díky.
Flay48, on 07 February 2019 - 09:20 AM, said: Nazdárek, budu se účastnit aukce na licenci a chtěl bych se
zeptat. Je nutné, abych setrval v aktuálním klanu do ukončení
aukce? nebo můžu přihodit do aukce a pak se přesunout jinam? Nedaří
se mi to nikde dohledat. díky a fajn den
Link on message: #16627818
Jmeno1, on 07 February 2019 - 11:22 AM, said: Kayi4ku, je skutečně Obj. 907 k mání napsoledy a nebo je to jen
fáma. Mne jen zajímá, jestli mám dát bony všechny a nebo si počkat
na příště a snažit se dostat mezi těch horních 10.000. Díky.Kayi4ek: Ahoj, rád bych ti to potvrdil, ale bohužel vůbec netuším,
jak to v budoucnu s 907 bude.
Flay48, on 07 February 2019 - 09:20 AM, said: Nazdárek, budu se účastnit aukce na licenci a chtěl bych se
zeptat. Je nutné, abych setrval v aktuálním klanu do ukončení
aukce? nebo můžu přihodit do aukce a pak se přesunout jinam? Nedaří
se mi to nikde dohledat. díky a fajn denKayi4ek: Ahoj, pro účast v aukci nemusíš být v
klanu 
Subject: Vojáci štěstěny na Globální mapu
Link on message: #16627752
roadyck, on 06 February 2019 - 04:35 PM, said: Jak se dá prodat tank někomu jinému?
Link on message: #16627752
roadyck, on 06 February 2019 - 04:35 PM, said: Jak se dá prodat tank někomu jinému?Kayi4ek: Nabírali do klanu hráče za úplatu a vyjezdili jim tank.
Subject: Daily Tournaments - Q&A - Post your questions here!
Link on message: #16627717
haribegovic36, on 06 February 2019 - 02:09 PM, said: what is happening with 3v3 4 tier ? some bugs ?
Agent_Kopp, on 06 February 2019 - 10:30 PM, said: Change members during the tournament or after the registration is
closed Name: SHIElD 08.02.2019 at 19.00
Link on message: #16627717
haribegovic36, on 06 February 2019 - 02:09 PM, said: what is happening with 3v3 4 tier ? some bugs ?CLRG: Hello there. Nothing visible on our side. What problem did you
encounter?
Agent_Kopp, on 06 February 2019 - 10:30 PM, said: Change members during the tournament or after the registration is
closed Name: SHIElD 08.02.2019 at 19.00 CLRG: Hello, can you please specify the change you would like to perform
so we can sort it out for you?
Subject: Looking for a top clan.
Link on message: #16627643
Link on message: #16627643
Jahpero: Thread locked due to OP request.
Subject: Remove Inaccurate Content From The Game
Link on message: #16627609
Link on message: #16627609
Jahpero: Hello !
This thread is now locked.
For the Open-poster, please avoid to create many threads related to the same subject / idea.
Thank you for your understanding.
Jahpero
This thread is now locked.
For the Open-poster, please avoid to create many threads related to the same subject / idea.
Thank you for your understanding.
Jahpero
Subject: Censorship on the forum
Link on message: #16627566
Link on message: #16627566
Jahpero: Hello everyone !
This inappropriate thread is now locked.
Thank you for your understanding.
Jahpero
This inappropriate thread is now locked.
Thank you for your understanding.
Jahpero
Subject: Pedal to the Metal Event
Link on message: #16625780
s_roger, on 06 February 2019 - 07:00 PM, said: Why do we need wheeled vehicles?
Link on message: #16625780
s_roger, on 06 February 2019 - 07:00 PM, said: Why do we need wheeled vehicles?eekeeboo: Why not?
Subject: Referral Program 2.0: The Finishing Touches
Link on message: #16625775
Maaaaaad, on 06 February 2019 - 06:41 PM, said:
Link on message: #16625775
Maaaaaad, on 06 February 2019 - 06:41 PM, said: eekeeboo: The announcement was made A LONG time ago, and you say you
are truly harmed by the ending but state that you did not care for
the information that was provided. There is only so much we can do
to inform you if you don't want to be informed. The recruitment
progress continued as per the request from players to extend it
because it was meant to end in January, but was extended further
(Also communicated). There's a stage where being friendly and your
friend are VERY different things. Note my lack of swearing, using
insults or derogatory terms at you. My job is to communicate with
you, not give you everything you want.
Subject: Soldiers of Fortune: An Update on Compensation
Link on message: #16625760
____Green____, on 06 February 2019 - 06:40 PM, said: Player support sends me back to forum and here I get warning, not
answer on my question.
Nice!
Link on message: #16625760
____Green____, on 06 February 2019 - 06:40 PM, said: Player support sends me back to forum and here I get warning, not
answer on my question. eekeeboo: Forum rules about sharing support tickets, this is why it's
important to read the forum rules and DEFINITELY read the part
about discussing moderation actions that will lead to further
sanctions.
Subject: Wheeled Vehicles: Take Them for a Spin!
Link on message: #16625740
Saar_Lion, on 05 February 2019 - 08:34 PM, said: OK, so lets talk about the Cz1 with it's imaginary
machine gun armament that rips everything to shreds in-game.
1) Even when it existed (for a short while before being withdrawn)
the tungsten SmK(H) round couldn't reliably penetrate 10mm -
8mm in RHA tests, 30 deg. impact angle, 13mm at 30 degrees impact
angle in German tests - 18mm 0 degrees @ 100mm.
Source: Anlage zu Schreiben Nr. 514/42 g. Kdos In 2 –
Vergleich von bei der Infantrie eingesetzten Waffen, 6.4.1942.
So far from being able to rip tanks with 30+mm of armour
apart at distant range while bobbing and weaving at an unrealistic
speed the Pz1 was incapable of IRL - the Pz1 should be what it was
in WW2 - easy meat. And that is without: 2) The
rounds (several millions of them) were withdrawn from service and
their tungsten removed. It was more efficiently used for tooling
rather than being fired in gobs that couldn't reliably penetrate
opposition armour. Not sure why the devs missed this
stuff... but easy to put right. Then we can get onto the T34
that will take 6 rounds of AP at point blank in the turret and not
even blink... ;-)
Link on message: #16625740
Saar_Lion, on 05 February 2019 - 08:34 PM, said: OK, so lets talk about the Cz1 with it's imaginary
machine gun armament that rips everything to shreds in-game.
1) Even when it existed (for a short while before being withdrawn)
the tungsten SmK(H) round couldn't reliably penetrate 10mm -
8mm in RHA tests, 30 deg. impact angle, 13mm at 30 degrees impact
angle in German tests - 18mm 0 degrees @ 100mm.
Source: Anlage zu Schreiben Nr. 514/42 g. Kdos In 2 –
Vergleich von bei der Infantrie eingesetzten Waffen, 6.4.1942.
So far from being able to rip tanks with 30+mm of armour
apart at distant range while bobbing and weaving at an unrealistic
speed the Pz1 was incapable of IRL - the Pz1 should be what it was
in WW2 - easy meat. And that is without: 2) The
rounds (several millions of them) were withdrawn from service and
their tungsten removed. It was more efficiently used for tooling
rather than being fired in gobs that couldn't reliably penetrate
opposition armour. Not sure why the devs missed this
stuff... but easy to put right. Then we can get onto the T34
that will take 6 rounds of AP at point blank in the turret and not
even blink... ;-) eekeeboo: So they did in fact exist? Which is the point someone
complaining they didn't Then you factor in game
balance not historical accuracy because you can't have game balance
with things like historical accuracy (Note things like where the
Tier 1 is positioned in the tech tree vs average year of production
for other vehicles).
Subject: Time to Win With Our x5 XP Packages
Link on message: #16625732
Sedziwoj, on 05 February 2019 - 08:36 PM, said: You still not understand, it was for elite vehicle, so not
boosting progress as this x5, and you have problem with "new
lines", but paying for x5 is ok for you. You only showing you
dualism.
Link on message: #16625732
Sedziwoj, on 05 February 2019 - 08:36 PM, said: You still not understand, it was for elite vehicle, so not
boosting progress as this x5, and you have problem with "new
lines", but paying for x5 is ok for you. You only showing you
dualism. eekeeboo: Because they are actually VERY different concepts and
mechanics, even fundamentally as one is free, one is not. One is a
bonus one is a mission.... beginning to end, they're
different.
Subject: What Chinese Vehicles To Go For?
Link on message: #16625704
Geno1isme, on 05 February 2019 - 02:24 PM, said: Ehm, are you talking about the ISU now? Do you even know the
armor model of the Wz? It's not about weakspots, the whole front
can be penned easily by most T8+ guns. Let me quote your
description for it again: "This bulky tank destroyer has enough
armour and slopes to deflect incoming shots while its gun fires
with an impressive alpha and penetration, starting from the
second gun. With good positioning on the map, this Tier VIII will
be hard to take out. Mind that it's best used in close or mid-range
combats." You really think that is fitting for a tank that
has less HP than an equal tier light tank? For a tank that can be
two-shotted by many enemies? With armor that can easily be penned
by most guns it meets, no matter how you position yourself
(pike-nose)?
Link on message: #16625704
Geno1isme, on 05 February 2019 - 02:24 PM, said: Ehm, are you talking about the ISU now? Do you even know the
armor model of the Wz? It's not about weakspots, the whole front
can be penned easily by most T8+ guns. Let me quote your
description for it again: "This bulky tank destroyer has enough
armour and slopes to deflect incoming shots while its gun fires
with an impressive alpha and penetration, starting from the
second gun. With good positioning on the map, this Tier VIII will
be hard to take out. Mind that it's best used in close or mid-range
combats." You really think that is fitting for a tank that
has less HP than an equal tier light tank? For a tank that can be
two-shotted by many enemies? With armor that can easily be penned
by most guns it meets, no matter how you position yourself
(pike-nose)? eekeeboo: First picture from google search for armour layout:
Реклама | Adv















