Developers posts on forum

Subject: History of the SU and ISU-152
Link on message: #16965717

tomolone, on 04 June 2019 - 01:04 PM, said: Good read, and people, don't forget that the ISU-152 would be matched vs panthers and tigers at worst IRL. No wonder its armour doesn't hold in game.   ISU-130 sale when

Subject: Supersized Sherman: the T14
Link on message: #16965712

HadurHun, on 04 June 2019 - 06:48 AM, said: The tank is really meh, while it's side armor with angle can bounce, it's frontal armor is not so effective!


MeetriX, on 04 June 2019 - 08:34 AM, said: "Page not found"

Subject: Sherman w rozmiarze XXL: T14
Link on message: #16965666

NeoPOLAND, on 04 June 2019 - 06:45 AM, said: WG mom pomysł

Dajcie pierwszy raz w historii WOTA (EU) 50% tańszy złoto lub min te 30% ...ale samo złoto nie łączone z srebrem czy innym pierdem

I ogłoście w trakcie tego zakupu że znowu wtargneli złodzieje i będą handlować tylko premkami VIII i X specjalnymi typu 907 , cheeften 95 , vkk, 279e, wt auf e100 , itp

I kurde macie zarobek taki że do końca roku nie musicie wystawiać marnych offert jak ta

Wy i my będziemy mega zadowoleni :p

Subject: Historia pojazdów SU oraz ISU-152
Link on message: #16965663

duzybalagan, on 04 June 2019 - 01:06 PM, said:   Znaczy co? niszczył pola pełne żyta, rzepaku i buraków?

Subject: Program rekrutacyjny 2.0: Przedłużenie sezonu!
Link on message: #16965659

Msciboj, on 03 June 2019 - 03:28 PM, said: To o ile ten sezon wydluzyli?


Coehoorn1906, on 03 June 2019 - 07:12 PM, said: W angielskiej wersji jest dokładniejsze info nt. terminu:     Jakby ktoś potrzebował tłumacza to znaczy, że sezon wydłużony "do odwołania", czyli nowych czołgów nie będzie

Subject: Sherman w rozmiarze XXL: T14
Link on message: #16965163

Subject: Jak to możliwe że ktoś zaczyna grę od 8 poziomu w drzewku?
Link on message: #16965155

Subject: Zbalansowanie pocisków specjalnych: Następny krok
Link on message: #16965135

Subject: Zbalansowanie pocisków specjalnych: Następny krok
Link on message: #16965100

vomalios, on 04 June 2019 - 09:51 AM, said:   Mnie cały czas zastanawia - czemu nie może być tak jak było dawniej, czyli amunicja specjalna za golda? Wymagałoby to rebalansu (może wreszcie devsi zrobiliby to dobrze), a pancerz HT w grze wreszcie by coś znaczył.

Subject: Daily Tournaments - Q&A - Post your questions here!
Link on message: #16965072

devildiddi, on 03 June 2019 - 10:17 PM, said: Hallo, Turnier 03.06.19  21:00 Uhr 3vs3 Tier 6 warum hat der Turniersieger keinen Namen und warum werden die Team Mitglieder nicht angezeigt? Grüsse devildiddi 22:25 Added after 7 minutes Hello, tournament 03.06.19  21:00 o`clock 3vs3 Tier 6 why does the tournament winner have no name and why are not the team members displayed? Greetings devildiddi

Subject: Zbalansowanie pocisków specjalnych: Następny krok
Link on message: #16965021

old_good_whiskey, on 04 June 2019 - 09:16 AM, said: po co kombinować? tak jak wielu zauważyło bez golda wiele maszyn będzie niegrywalnych. Wystarczy ograniczyć ilość golda do 15% wilekości magazynu amunicji. Duże kalibry mają mało pocisków, małe zabierają ich wiele ale dmg na strzał maja mniejszy. Gold nie latałby tak gęsto bo by go było za mało żeby grac nim całą bitwę. Wykluczy to też granie pay to win. Nie ważne ile masz kasy i tak nie wystrzelisz więcej golda ponad limit.

Subject: Getting TK'd
Link on message: #16964940

Subject: Podsumowanie konkursu i wystawy modeli kartonowych w Bielsku Podlaskim
Link on message: #16964871

ChristoR76, on 03 June 2019 - 08:43 PM, said: Na zdjęciu nr 2 widać polską flagę na Bramie Branderburskiej, proponuję ją zamaskować bo może wybuchnąć szambo-burza na temat czy powinna tam być, czy może niekoniecznie

Subject: [_CDC_] Les Canons des Corsaires
Link on message: #16964066

Subject: Présentation et recrutement TPYS
Link on message: #16964030

Subject: [N00T] Pingu 3.0 You can (not) reborn
Link on message: #16964011

Subject: [_CDC_] Les Canons des Corsaires
Link on message: #16963682

lateigne12, on 03 June 2019 - 09:04 PM, said: Faut quitter N00T d'abord    

Subject: a propos de *edited
Link on message: #16963677

Subject: [_CDC_] Les Canons des Corsaires
Link on message: #16963658

CerpelaiGila, on 03 June 2019 - 08:53 PM, said: Jahpero cherche un nouveau clan, peut être ?

Subject: [_CDC_] Les Canons des Corsaires
Link on message: #16963569

turbonetic, on 03 June 2019 - 08:35 PM, said:  

Subject: statistique
Link on message: #16963496

Subject: Rekrutierungsprogramm 2.0: Saison verlängert!
Link on message: #16963393

SiliconSidewinder, on 03 June 2019 - 01:24 PM, said: die eigentliche Frage für mich wäre jetzt: bis wann verlängert?


Samaka_, on 03 June 2019 - 01:51 PM, said: Jetzt fragt mich mein Rekrut, ob er dann auch mehr Zeit hat?   Bedeutet "Saison" in der News das was im Spielclient mit "Zeitraum 1" unter den Verträgen steht?   Eine News die mehr Fragen aufwirft als Informationen enthält finde ich jetzt "gewöhnungsbedürftig".


kaadomin, on 03 June 2019 - 02:16 PM, said: Gibt es einen neuen Slot? Der sollte eigentlich erst im nächsten Abschnitt wieder zugeteilt werden.


mausklickman, on 03 June 2019 - 04:28 PM, said: Ich habe da einmal eine Frage: Im Rekrutierungsprogramm 1.0, welche ohne Auslaufzeit angesetzt war, bin ich quasi um meine Belohnung beschissen worden, weil WG nachträglich ein Ablaufdatum eingefügt hat. Entschädigung dafür? Null! Ich will nicht jammern, aber ein seriöser Kaufmann würde anders handeln. Mein Fazit: Einmal beschissen worden, also nie wieder Geld in diesen Laden stecken!


Sabcoll, on 03 June 2019 - 04:43 PM, said: InGame steht noch, dass der Zeitraum 1 ablaufen wird. Was heißt das jetzt? Müsste ich die letzten Punkte noch mühsam in 2 Abenden ergrinden oder habe ich noch nen bisschen länger Zeit?!

Subject: Schlagt hart zu mit dem neuen Special
Link on message: #16963316

Subject: Schnappt euch das Objekt 268
Link on message: #16963202

Ex_Tankie_703_killer, on 03 June 2019 - 12:37 PM, said: Erstmal gegönnt den Hobel.
Besser haben als brauchen.
Irgendwann ist das 268 wieder op

Subject: Special: Besatzungsboost
Link on message: #16963140

Subject: Onkel Hardwares Kaffeeklatsch(en) :) 15-16Uhr, Kännchen nur drausen!
Link on message: #16962756

Huzzemann, on 03 June 2019 - 02:37 PM, said: kinder, hier donnert es gerade, dass die gläser in der vitrine klirren! also als ob schlachtevieh in meiner wohnung furzt und gleichzeitig rülpst......

Subject: Special Shells Rebalancing: Taking Another Step Forward
Link on message: #16962698

iKnewIT, on 03 June 2019 - 09:58 AM, said:   The same situation is for those who already have the invitation.....  Nothing works on WoT EU Sandbox page.     Besides, general Sandbox's forum page doesn't work too, it seems http://forum-sandbox.worldoftanks.com/ And there is still no possibility to install Sandbox in WGGC too, as it is written (Step 2. If the download does not start automatically, find the World of Tanks Sandbox tab and click "Install") here https://worldoftanks.eu/en/sandbox/ (maybe it's only me who can't find how to do it?).

Subject: Rééquilibrage des obus spéciaux : un autre pas en avant
Link on message: #16962600

faboe, on 31 May 2019 - 02:12 PM, said: Bonjour, Arrêtez donc de toucher les mécaniques du jeu.... La plupart des modifs n'apportent rien. J'en veux pour exemple les artilleries qui ne sont plus intéressantes à jouer et qui sont toujours aussi pénalisantes pour les autres joueurs... Vous revoyez sans cesse ce qui fonctionne plutôt bien... Il y a tant de points d'améliorations possibles autres que cela : - Faire des games play par niveau pour équilibrer les équipes   Pour ça il y a les batailles classées. En batailles aléatoires, faire un MM par niveau ne résoudrai pas les soucis actuels que tu peux rencontrer en jeu. Je ne souhaite pas m'étendre sur ce sujet dans ce topic mais tu as plein d'autres discussion à ce propos sur le forum.   - Varier davantage les cartes, - Multiplier les cartes, (nous avions des cartes qui ne méritaient pas d'être retirées)   D'autres modes de jeu sont présent pour varier le gameplay (Ligne de front /  Classées / 30 vs 30). Kharkov est actuellement en train d'etre retravaillée. Les developpeurs travaillent pour le moment sur d'autres cartes pour le mode de jeu ligne de front.   - Equilibrer le niveau de détection entre les chars.... Vous avez voulus insérer des scouts T10 qui voient moins bien que beaucoup des médiums....   Oui mais les coefficients de camouflage des chars légers et moyens ne sont pas du tout les mêmes.   Voila très vite pour les principaux. Alors essayez de gérer les décisions arbitraires de soit-disant équilibrage, là où il n'y a rien à faire... De grace, laissez nous nos obus tels qu'ils sont.... Merci  


7up05, on 31 May 2019 - 02:30 PM, said:   +1 Personnellement j'aurai simplement limité l'import de munition Gold. Il y a une limite pour les équipements, donc avoir seulement 10% de gold sur l'import total de munitions serais plus logique.


HipsR, on 31 May 2019 - 04:35 PM, said: C'est sympa ces articles multi-langues, ça fait très pro je trouve.     Je ne suis pas convaincu par cette manœuvre d'obus spéciaux. Je serai plutôt pour revoir les pénétrations et les blindages totalement broken (Chieftain, 260, et autres chars spéciaux - comme par hasard, donc que tout le monde n'a pas et qui fait que les gens ne viennent pas trop longtemps jouer du tier X, car  c'est juste inique).


Gamelyn, on 01 June 2019 - 05:06 AM, said: le plus simple est de les supprimer arrêtez de nous prendre pour des jambons . SUPPRESSION simple des obus spéciaux car on a déjà a supporter : - la différence d'équipement dans un même tiers ( char stock contre char full ). - le MM de +2 avec  la mention TB pour les 8/10 car on sait tous que le 10 est une dimension a part . Quand on réunis ça , cela fait un char tiers 8 avec un canon de 7 contre des char tiers 10 ............ Le plus simple suppression des obus spéciaux et réaffectation des obus ap , apcr , he à chaque catégorie de char ..

Subject: The Object 268 is Now Up for the Taking
Link on message: #16962554

turbo_shine, on 01 June 2019 - 06:14 AM, said: implying anyone actually want's that pathetic thing

Subject: Hit Them Hard with a New Special
Link on message: #16962548

bibula3, on 03 June 2019 - 09:12 AM, said: They are making sure nobody participates in the P2W ammo Sandbox test.

Subject: We Shut Down the Black Market
Link on message: #16962424

Tiger64_, on 31 May 2019 - 08:39 AM, said: This event reminded how WG was in the old days.Hats off to WG for this event and I truly hope this wont be the last time we see it.As a suggestion:If WG could sell the tank for gold could they offer us an alternative tank for credits or even the equivalent of credits to the amount of gold.If WG could implement this once or twice a year itl give players time to grind for credits and make it easier for those who cant afford gold.Im sorry I missed out on the Black Dog but hopefully with the next event i'l be able to get it.


Darth_Clicker, on 31 May 2019 - 09:04 AM, said:   Maybe WG figured that due to Brexit the UK wouldn't want to participate in EU server activities....


Sir_Armand, on 31 May 2019 - 04:57 PM, said:   Thanks for the event WG!

I LIKED that WG went outside the box on this one, and offered Prem/reward tanks for silver. And an opportunity for those so inclined to pick up some of the rarer vehicles. 
WG, PLEASE continue to try to find similar events/projects to hold in the future.

Some feedback about the BM event:

Timing:
While I understand the reason for wanting to release items in EU and Russia at the same time, and while I realise that Russia spans11 timezones, shifting the time back one hour would get the UK in at 06/18, and still keep Moscow at 10/22, which is preferable to UK at 05/17, and Moscow at 09/21 IMO. I'm Swedish, so I'm not complaining on my own behalf, since we got the offers at 06/18 .

Information:
Again, while I get why you wanted to keep both items and prices secret, I believe that you would have gotten happier customers if you gave us a heads up,like: "Rumor has it that the black market will only trade in gold next time", or, "Only the richest, with well over 15M silver will be able to buy the next rarity, it may well sell for almost twice that.", it would allow players to prepre their wallets beforehand, causing less strain on the servers.    The Type 59G should have had a HUGE sign next to it: "REGULAR PREMIUM, NOT DOUBLED PREMIUM INCOME".
Actually, ALL the vehicles should have their stats displayed next to the offer, including hidden information like Preferential MM, bonus% to credits/xp, so people can make informed decisions.

It may be obvious to a WG staff event planner that a 150.000 gold tank on the chinese server will not be sold for 25.000 gold on the EU server.
BUT if you have a 59G in the game, and it makes double income, and you sell a 59G, people will believe that they have bought a 59G, and that it therefore has a doubled income bonus! 

It is not strange that they feel cheated, you must realise that people had less than 60 seconds to make an informed decision. I didn't know what the 59G costs on the chinese server(or any of the prices there actually), but I did know that it makes double income.
Now, I really dislike the way it looks, so I was never interested, but you really dropped the ball on that one, and the WG feedback:

" well, you should have realised that of COURSE it doesn't make duble income at that price", implicating that the buyers are stupid, and dismissing the complaint with a "well, if you haven't played it, send a ticket, and you get refunded, no need to complain", is very, very badly handled customer service and communication.

Item selection:
Premium tanks are a good choice, selling them for silver were an even better one. Some of them I just don't understand. Like the pz2J for example. Why would we want to see more of them?
I would like to encourage you to consider what vehicles you consider well balanced, but that does not see enough play, and offer those.
Or, plainly underpowered ones, like the IS6, and offer those at a bargain. Which in the case of the IS6, You DID! and well done to you for that.
Maybe the IS should have been offered for silver?

 Perhaps there are opportunities for other things? Garage and barracks slots for silver for example (IMO they should be free or for silver in the standard game, discouragiung players from getting mnore tanks and crew cannot be a sound business model).
Camouflages, girl crew, Anti-artillery sale of spall liners etc.

But not skins or cosmetic stuff for silver, let tgat always be gold. Having people pay you real money for cosmetics are a great thing, and gives you revenue that does not affect gameplay,  keeping you from going down that dangerous pay-to-win path.   Method of payment:
If you really want to give out a few of very rare items, consider an auction. Put out 100 T59, to the highest bidders. Be entirely transparent with the bids. Let the ones that really, really want to buy them pay market value for them. Players get an opportunity, and WG makes money.

Other:
I'd like to be able to disable max vehicles sold in some way at events like this. I realise that it's there for my own protection, but perhaps I could request an affirmation code to my mail, phone, or mobile Id? say one that in 24 hrs waives the restriction for 24 hrs? Or just make it optional?

Event Idea:
How about once a year have a "garage sale", where players can offer vehicles for sale, for silver or gold, to other players. WG could take a cut of 5% or so. I realise that it may require programming that just isn'tfeasible, but it would be a fun event.

Also: perhaps some event where you encourage players to socialise/get to know each other. There isn't much of a community right now, so platooning with people you haven't met before, or trying to find likeminded players to platoon with, really isn't a thing in WoT outside of ones own personal friendsector and/or clan.

Communication and feedback:
I believe that WG would benefit from shifting a lot of the communication from mere frontpage announcements to the forum. 
The current links to discussion threads on announcement topics (like this one) are a great example of this done right. Well done WG!   But, I believe that even more communication and feedback topics, where WG staff responds and asks questions would benefit WG even more.
WG considering an event in the future, ask players to vote on the tanks they want to get most (not telling the players why) , bam! WG has  wishlist. 
Ask players which  tanks they don't play becayse they are too weak: bam! WG has a list of vehicls that might need a buff.
Ask players what vehicles that don't play, not because they're necessarily bad, but because they are boring(no real role), obsolete(other vehicles does what they do, just better) too OP (no fun to play) etc, etc.

Anyways, you have recieved a lot of critique for this event, but I would like to commend you!

I see what you tried to do, and I think that you will get better at it in the future.


Bordhaw, on 31 May 2019 - 06:25 PM, said: Thanks for the event WG!

I LIKED that WG went outside the box on this one, and offered Prem/reward tanks for silver. And an opportunity for those so inclined to pick up some of the rarer vehicles. 
WG, PLEASE continue to try to find similar events/projects to hold in the future.

Some feedback about the BM event:

Timing:
While I understand the reason for wanting to release items in EU and Russia at the same time, and while I realise that Russia spans11 timezones, shifting the time back one hour would get the UK in at 06/18, and still keep Moscow at 10/22, which is preferable to UK at 05/17, and Moscow at 09/21 IMO. I'm Swedish, so I'm not complaining on my own behalf, since we got the offers at 06/18 .

Information:
Again, while I get why you wanted to keep both items and prices secret, I believe that you would have gotten happier customers if you gave us a heads up,like: "Rumor has it that the black market will only trade in gold next time", or, "Only the richest, with well over 15M silver will be able to buy the next rarity, it may well sell for almost twice that.", it would allow players to prepre their wallets beforehand, causing less strain on the servers.    The Type 59G should have had a HUGE sign next to it: "REGULAR PREMIUM, NOT DOUBLED PREMIUM INCOME".
Actually, ALL the vehicles should have their stats displayed next to the offer, including hidden information like Preferential MM, bonus% to credits/xp, so people can make informed decisions.

It may be obvious to a WG staff event planner that a 150.000 gold tank on the chinese server will not be sold for 25.000 gold on the EU server.
BUT if you have a 59G in the game, and it makes double income, and you sell a 59G, people will believe that they have bought a 59G, and that it therefore has a doubled income bonus! 

It is not strange that they feel cheated, you must realise that people had less than 60 seconds to make an informed decision. I didn't know what the 59G costs on the chinese server(or any of the prices there actually), but I did know that it makes double income.
Now, I really dislike the way it looks, so I was never interested, but you really dropped the ball on that one, and the WG feedback:

" well, you should have realised that of COURSE it doesn't make duble income at that price", implicating that the buyers are stupid, and dismissing the complaint with a "well, if you haven't played it, send a ticket, and you get refunded, no need to complain", is very, very badly handled customer service and communication.

Item selection:
Premium tanks are a good choice, selling them for silver were an even better one. Some of them I just don't understand. Like the pz2J for example. Why would we want to see more of them?
I would like to encourage you to consider what vehicles you consider well balanced, but that does not see enough play, and offer those.
Or, plainly underpowered ones, like the IS6, and offer those at a bargain. Which in the case of the IS6, You DID! and well done to you for that.
Maybe the IS should have been offered for silver?

 Perhaps there are opportunities for other things? Garage and barracks slots for silver for example (IMO they should be free or for silver in the standard game, discouragiung players from getting mnore tanks and crew cannot be a sound business model).
Camouflages, girl crew, Anti-artillery sale of spall liners etc.

But not skins or cosmetic stuff for silver, let tgat always be gold. Having people pay you real money for cosmetics are a great thing, and gives you revenue that does not affect gameplay,  keeping you from going down that dangerous pay-to-win path.   Method of payment:
If you really want to give out a few of very rare items, consider an auction. Put out 100 T59, to the highest bidders. Be entirely transparent with the bids. Let the ones that really, really want to buy them pay market value for them. Players get an opportunity, and WG makes money.

Other:
I'd like to be able to disable max vehicles sold in some way at events like this. I realise that it's there for my own protection, but perhaps I could request an affirmation code to my mail, phone, or mobile Id? say one that in 24 hrs waives the restriction for 24 hrs? Or just make it optional?

Event Idea:
How about once a year have a "garage sale", where players can offer vehicles for sale, for silver or gold, to other players. WG could take a cut of 5% or so. I realise that it may require programming that just isn'tfeasible, but it would be a fun event.

Also: perhaps some event where you encourage players to socialise/get to know each other. There isn't much of a community right now, so platooning with people you haven't met before, or trying to find likeminded players to platoon with, really isn't a thing in WoT outside of ones own personal friendsector and/or clan.

Communication and feedback:
I believe that WG would benefit from shifting a lot of the communication from mere frontpage announcements to the forum. 
The current links to discussion threads on announcement topics (like this one) are a great example of this done right. Well done WG!   But, I believe that even more communication and feedback topics, where WG staff responds and asks questions would benefit WG even more.
WG considering an event in the future, ask players to vote on the tanks they want to get most (not telling the players why) , bam! WG has  wishlist. 
Ask players which  tanks they don't play becayse they are too weak: bam! WG has a list of vehicls that might need a buff.
Ask players what vehicles that don't play, not because they're necessarily bad, but because they are boring(no real role), obsolete(other vehicles does what they do, just better) too OP (no fun to play) etc, etc.

Anyways, you have recieved a lot of critique for this event, but I would like to commend you!

I see what you tried to do, and I think that you will get better at it in the future.

Subject: Reclamate il Pacchetto di assistenza Eco con Twitch Prime
Link on message: #16962378

Subject: Özel Mermi Yeniden Dengelemesi: Bir Adım Daha İleri
Link on message: #16962314

Subject: El Object 268 os espera
Link on message: #16962300

lospescas, on 02 June 2019 - 04:53 PM, said:   Personalmente el SU-152 lo jugué con el cañón troll de152mm full HEs, pero es según gustos.

Subject: Przywalcie im w nowym wydarzeniu
Link on message: #16962259

geohound, on 03 June 2019 - 10:06 AM, said:   Nie ma sprawy. Tylko Waszym testerom/korektorom za to PŁACĄ, a użytkownicy-klienci korygują Was za darmo.

Subject: Cerramos el mercado negro
Link on message: #16962234

Subject: Oferta especial: Impulso de la tripulación
Link on message: #16962218

Redmon, on 02 June 2019 - 07:21 PM, said: ¿Las bonificaciones se suman entre ellas o se multiplican? Pregunto porque si es multiplicativo usar los bonos de experiencia ya que sería una bola de exp enorme

Subject: Karaborsayı Kapattık
Link on message: #16962189

altayTR_33, on 31 May 2019 - 02:25 PM, said: inşallah  aldığımız kredili tankları geri toplamazsınız 

Subject: Obtenez l'Ensemble Echo avec Twitch Prime
Link on message: #16962162

UCLA_06, on 30 May 2019 - 09:39 PM, said: Par contre c'est bien de mettre du zimmerit sur le KT ricain, mais à quand le zimmerit comme camo/skin pour les chars allemands sérieusement... C'est l'une des choses les plus connues sur les chars allemands et en 9 ans de jeu toujours pas un cammo/skin là dessus... Il y a les inscriptions mais pas cela

Subject: General Feedback
Link on message: #16962125

deorum, on 30 May 2019 - 05:31 PM, said: Still no info about the originally announced -now abandonded?- changes of AMX 30B. 

This is the 3rd Iteration of the common test.     we got info on the french forum   "The AMX 30B tests were inconclusive and have been cancelled (for the time being)."


K1Lc4m, on 03 June 2019 - 09:16 AM, said: How about giving lights 2 and arty 1 reserve? Everything else remains the same? No need to have a class with all three reserves.


Hezs, on 01 June 2019 - 08:31 PM, said: I thinks a reward for participating in the common test would be nice. Nothing big, just a little something to give people some motivation to play. I have talked to multiple people and they have said to them it is a waste of time. So in my opinion some sort of reward would help bring people to the common test which would help you guys get more feedback and make the game better.     Right, the reward doesn't have to be anything big. Maybe it could be some missions. Maybe it could be a little P next to your name for public tester instead of the b for beta testers. Maybe it could be a lower tier premium tank. Maybe it could be free credits, maybe some gold, maybe a paint scheme, maybe a few days of premium account. The point is they could give the public test some sort of incentive to help both the players and themselves and the game all around.


Rasg1, on 02 June 2019 - 02:43 AM, said:


Rasg1, on 03 June 2019 - 06:13 AM, said: