Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Дата: 18.09.2012 15:56:55
Lord_Michael, on Sep 06 2012 - 03:58, said: After comparing stats with Clan members it appears my figures are
correct....21-22% of games are lost (or won) at 15 -2 or
15-3...............since this violates the law of averages, how
does matchmaker bias the game so much?Vallter: Everything depends on team performance. Tanks are balanced well
with the MM.
extremetowboy, on Sep 06 2012 - 04:27, said: I have played for awhile now kept a premium for awhile and i have
to say i do enjoy the game but my only issue is i do not find it
fair or right to lose credits in battles ! i can understand not
receiving any in a bad battle or if not earned ! but if i get on my
higher tiers unless we win and i kill sevral tanks i always lose
credits so fighting in higher tier battles is someting i just
really get frustrated with . if it was always in my control is one
thing but if u get thrown in a bad group your screwed ! i served in
the military and fired alot of rounds blew up alot of stuff and i
never paid for the bullets ! i realize yall are in this for money
but ajusting it to a point of just not getting credits in a bad
battle still wouldn't hurt yalls purse at all !D. Ellis
Vallter: This serves two purposes. Makes players play lower tiers from time
to time and also play more careful. it's intended to be so and
won't change.
misscleo, on Sep 06 2012 - 06:52, said: Are you guys going to fix the issue with clan chat and other stuff
being stored in replays for 8.0? Will you remove the data that
shouldn't be there or change the way you implement the
encryption?Obscurity isn't going to prevent the dedicated few who figure this stuff out initially, like the author of wotreplays blog. If you read the blog the author is now looking at the saved passwords. Not sure how that's implemented, but if it's only a CRC hash and DES/RC2, even with salting that seems weak. Do we have to worry about malicious programs stealing our passwords again?
Will there be more graphic options in game?
Some options seem to be bundled and affect more than one parameter in the preferences.xml when changed in game.
Will the resolution option be worked on?
The game seems to be missing a few common ones like 1280x720. Also it's possible to set any aspect ratio with any resolution included, making for odd combinations like 16:9 or 5:4 @1920x1200 which doesn't make a lick of sense. Maybe when a user selects 16:10 he can only see 16:10 resolutions?
Vallter: 1)Could you please describe the problem in details? As far as I
remember, replays contain just battle recording and have no
connection to the login information
2)Yes, we will be adding an advanced control on graphics gradually with new render. 'Bloom' effect is one of the first points we've added to the menu.
3)We will discuss your suggestion and probably plan to implement thie feature. But all in all, it will have low priority.
2)Yes, we will be adding an advanced control on graphics gradually with new render. 'Bloom' effect is one of the first points we've added to the menu.
3)We will discuss your suggestion and probably plan to implement thie feature. But all in all, it will have low priority.
Otto_matic_Reiffel, on Sep 06 2012 - 08:43, said: Hi VallterWith the extra stats you are considering displaying, could we also get more complete armour values displayed? Technically these are all publicly available since they are based off real designs so your security department shouldn't have any issues with this.
What I'm referring to is situations like the Tiger II where the front hull armour is displayed in game as 150mm, but these is no mention that the lower hull is only 120mm.
Vallter: We do not want to overwhelm players wirh lines and lines of
characteristics. Once a more sophisticated system to display such
statistics will be added, we will implement such feature.
Timberwolf84, on Sep 06 2012 - 16:17, said: What do you mean your post got nuked? Did it get erased?I for one am very interested to hear the reasons for German guns getting lower penetration values.
Can we please get a reply on the penetration questions?
When the Panzer IV is "changed", what is it getting to account for the loss of its turret and gun to make it different from the Panzer III/IV?
Vallter: 1)As I've said before, Overlord should probably be looking at the
question.
2)It will be overally rebalanced, you can check it out on the Public Test of 8.0
2)It will be overally rebalanced, you can check it out on the Public Test of 8.0
RMS_Gigantic, on Sep 06 2012 - 17:19, said: Will World of Tanks eventually get more advanced destruction
physics like World of Planes and World of Warships are planned to
have? (Where vehicles can break apart, holes are more than just
textures, etc.)Vallter: Yes, it's planned for the next year.
Vollketten, on Sep 06 2012 - 18:33, said: Devs, Hi. I have asked this several times now but not had any
acknowledgment or answer so I hope I'm not just being ignored
becausetier 2 tanks are valued enough.Vallter: Befire answering the question, please, specify, whether you mean
PanzerKampfWagen II or other vehicle?
Timberwolf84, on Sep 06 2012 - 19:23, said: Are you kidding me? Why? This is a Q&A thread...........Can one of the devs please advise why the top German tanks have not received a penetration buff? They are all at the bottom of the win % rankings based off of recent numbers posted on the server.
Vallter: 1)Off-topic, non-related discussion and repeat of questions, which
were already answered is not allowed in this thread. I'm quite
loyal to all above mentioned, thus moderators normally just remove
the post, without issueing warnings.
2)On which statistics are these numbers based?-)
2)On which statistics are these numbers based?-)
Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era














