Common History Myths: Historical Inevitability Edition
Дата: 08.07.2014 18:16:32
PlaidPony, on Jul 06 2014 - 15:01, said: The only problem with the Wikipedia explanation is it's trivial to
put some tracer compound in the base of the shell without
interfering with the ballistics too much, so if that was really
such an issue it could have been solved with ease.The_Chieftain: Not so easy. See Test
6: http://worldoftanks.com/en/news/21/The_Chieftains_Hatch_Firefly2/
Zinegata, on Jul 08 2014 - 05:12, said: It's like the American conservatives ferverently referring
to the Declaration of Independence which states that liberty is a
right inherent to man, without realizing that the Declaration of
Independence has already been declared to not be a law of the
United States; and that the actual core legal document (The
Constitution) in fact does not make the same declaration and
instead says that rights are in fact granted and protected by the
state. They seriously never actually ever read the documents they
so profess to uphold.The_Chieftain: Technically, a number of the rights in the BoR are not granted by
the State, as they are considered to have been pre-existing, but
they are protected by the State from the State. (Constitutional
rights are not protected by the State against non-State actors. For
example, unlike in, say, Ireland, you have no Constitutional
right to be secure in your home from burglars in the US.)
Common History Myths: Historical Inevitability Edition