Ordnance vs AGF: Pershing Part 2
Дата: 02.06.2014 05:34:38
S842, on Jun 02 2014 - 03:00, said: The 17 pounder APDS had substantially greater penetration (more
than the American 90mm too) than the 76 mm guns HVAP, but
started to have accuracy problems beyond 1,000 yards.
Also obviously, I look at the same data and feel that I would
rather face the Germans with a 17 pounder. So are they
coming, and if so when? (because if I turn a corner at
Ruinberg, and a heavy is sitting there, I sure would like to have
either of these guns to the current 76mm and inaccuracy problems at
1,000 yards won't matter.)The_Chieftain: I'd argue that it started having accuracy problems at under
500 yards if British testing gave it a 50% chance to hit a
Panther's turret and recommended against its use at all over that
range. You don't explain, though, why it is that you would
prefer the 17pr. What is 17pr likely to achieve on the battlefield
that 76mm could not? Neither could reliably punch through the front
of a Panther at combat ranges. Neither had much chance against a
King tiger. Both were perfectly capable against Pz4, Tigers, etc.
There is a very, very narrow set of circumstances in which
17pr has a noticeable advantage over 76mm. And for that, you're
increasing your signature, have a slower lay onto target, slower
rate of fire, less accuracy, less ammo, (for a little while, almost
no HE), and, in Firefly, you also drop a crewman and machine gun.
If both tanks were available at the same time (which wasn't the
case, which is the true merit of Firefly), it would be an
eyebrow-raiser to take the 17pr, I think. as for when it's
in game, that's for the revs to figure out. The 3d models are made,
it's a matter of their slot in the release timeline.
Ordnance vs AGF: Pershing Part 2














