Why on Track to Dirty Arty
Дата: 13.04.2015 00:15:39
Aspalar, on Apr 12 2015 - 20:57, said: You started out with several posts of insulting drivel, I called
you out on it. Maybe look in the mirror after reading this
last post of yours. Self awareness is a virtue. I doubt your
ego will comprehend the irony again. But do go on, it's amusing to
no end. Lert: Because you're the uber-arbiter of everything that's fair.
Uhuh. I've told you before, I reply to people in a tone
befitting their posts. However, since you're making a point
out of proving how much I suck, please explain to me how this is
insulting drivel: "Because it 'makes them feel better' -
(Yeah and I'm Queen Elizabeth) Because 'if we complain long and
loud enough WG may some day listen' - (Uhuh - and Elvis is still
alive) Because 'we know better how to make an internet pixel tonk
game than WG' - (Ok, so, where's their multi million dollar
multinational franchise then?) It's in people's nature to
complain. The better people have it, the more inane their whines.
And if a class of internet pixel vehicle in an internet pixel tonk
game is their biggest concern, they have it better than most people
on this godforsaken rock in space." Sassy, perhaps.
Insulting? Whoa, you have a thick skin if that insults you. The
three 'because' lines are actual reasons arty haters have put fort
for their incessant whiners. Or this: "That is
probably the reason behind this ontrack. What better way to gather
large amounts of data on a specific vehicle than by promoting it
through a special?" Those aren't insulting, and they were
posted before you called me out, of mighty arbiter of all that is
true and just in the world. I did post some slightly
insulting things, like for example "Because WG wants to make
sure elitist chuckleheads have enough to whine about."
Which, you're right, i's absolutely so much worse of an insult than
in the OP; "So Wargaming, you want more "fair and balanced"
clickers to completely infect and ruin how people play? And to the
Conq GC at that. The Conq GC is completely balanced. " ....
"fair and balanced clickers" to completely infect and ruin how
people play ... Because that's totally not insulting at all.
I also posted: "In terms of 'chances of this ever happening'
that is the equivalent of telling a Jihadist to read two pages on
the web and convert to Christianity. " Yeah, that is pretty
insulting. I'll give you that. And exactly what I intended for it
to be. Yet, that was not the post of mine that you decided
to call me out on, oh great and infallible justicar of all that is
right ... Speaking of which, I find it a bit hypocrite of
you to call me out on insulting, while only a relatively small
portion of my posts have been, compared to all of yours. But then,
you're a better player than I am, so that makes it all right,
right? And you're the one speaking to me about needing a mirror ...
Go self copulate, you vertically challenged matriarch
copulating female dog, and stop being a self-righteous hypocrite of
dubious value. <-- That there is an insult. Report
me if you're a snitch, print it out and put it in your bird cage,
have sleepless nights over it, respond to it with more of your own
infallibleness, whatever. I am out of this thread. And, yes, you
have my permission to feel morally superior at that 'victory'.
Why on Track to Dirty Arty














