Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Why on Track to Dirty Arty

Дата: 13.04.2015 00:15:39
View PostAspalar, on Apr 12 2015 - 20:57, said: You started out with several posts of insulting drivel, I called you out on it. Maybe look in the mirror after reading this last post of yours. Self awareness is a virtue. I doubt your ego will comprehend the irony again. But do go on, it's amusing to no end. 

Lert:   Because you're the uber-arbiter of everything that's fair. Uhuh.   I've told you before, I reply to people in a tone befitting their posts.   However, since you're making a point out of proving how much I suck, please explain to me how this is insulting drivel:   "Because it 'makes them feel better' - (Yeah and I'm Queen Elizabeth) Because 'if we complain long and loud enough WG may some day listen' - (Uhuh - and Elvis is still alive) Because 'we know better how to make an internet pixel tonk game than WG' - (Ok, so, where's their multi million dollar multinational franchise then?)   It's in people's nature to complain. The better people have it, the more inane their whines. And if a class of internet pixel vehicle in an internet pixel tonk game is their biggest concern, they have it better than most people on this godforsaken rock in space."   Sassy, perhaps. Insulting? Whoa, you have a thick skin if that insults you. The three 'because' lines are actual reasons arty haters have put fort for their incessant whiners.   Or this:   "That is probably the reason behind this ontrack. What better way to gather large amounts of data on a specific vehicle than by promoting it through a special?"   Those aren't insulting, and they were posted before you called me out, of mighty arbiter of all that is true and just in the world.   I did post some slightly insulting things, like for example   "Because WG wants to make sure elitist chuckleheads have enough to whine about."   Which, you're right, i's absolutely so much worse of an insult than in the OP;   "So Wargaming, you want more "fair and balanced" clickers to completely infect and ruin how people play? And to the Conq GC at that. The Conq GC is completely balanced. "   .... "fair and balanced clickers" to completely infect and ruin how people play ... Because that's totally not insulting at all.   I also posted:   "In terms of 'chances of this ever happening' that is the equivalent of telling a Jihadist to read two pages on the web and convert to Christianity. "   Yeah, that is pretty insulting. I'll give you that. And exactly what I intended for it to be.   Yet, that was not the post of mine that you decided to call me out on, oh great and infallible justicar of all that is right ...   Speaking of which, I find it a bit hypocrite of you to call me out on insulting, while only a relatively small portion of my posts have been, compared to all of yours. But then, you're a better player than I am, so that makes it all right, right? And you're the one speaking to me about needing a mirror ...   Go self copulate, you vertically challenged matriarch copulating female dog, and stop being a self-righteous hypocrite of dubious value.   <-- That there is an insult. Report me if you're a snitch, print it out and put it in your bird cage, have sleepless nights over it, respond to it with more of your own infallibleness, whatever. I am out of this thread. And, yes, you have my permission to feel morally superior at that 'victory'.

Реклама | Adv