Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Дата: 17.05.2021 06:17:03
SimplyPzB2, on May 16 2021 - 22:59, said: - Block Quote
Nope. sbmm is only battles with 40-60% chance to
win. So if you look at the 40-49 and 50-59 brackets below,
that is sbmm If you look at all the battles, you are looking at the
current 'random' mm, my win rate is 56.3%. If you look at JUST the
40-49 and 50-59 battles, i.e. sbmm, my win rate is 56%. - sbmm will
not force your win rate to 50%. Fact.
Block Quote
DeviouslyCursed: Nope. sbmm is only battles with 40-60% chance to
win. So if you look at the 40-49 and 50-59 brackets below,
that is sbmm If you look at all the battles, you are looking at the
current 'random' mm, my win rate is 56.3%. If you look at JUST the
40-49 and 50-59 battles, i.e. sbmm, my win rate is 56%. - sbmm will
not force your win rate to 50%. Fact.
Whatever system you are using is ranking you at about a
52-53% player. It is underestimating you, so your win chance is
actually higher than what is listed in your chart. More likely it
is underestimating the platoon you are always playing with. If the
system you are using to calculate the win chance is accurate, your
mean and median "chance to win" should both be where (or at least
near) your overall win rate is. It is not in your chart. It is
significantly lower. Drastically lower. But I don't expect
someone of your 'statistics caliber' to understand what I'm talking
about.
Block Quote
DeviouslyCursed:
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?