Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?

Дата: 17.05.2021 06:17:03
View PostSimplyPzB2, on May 16 2021 - 22:59, said: - Block Quote   Nope.   sbmm is only battles with 40-60% chance to win.  So if you look at the 40-49 and 50-59 brackets below, that is sbmm If you look at all the battles, you are looking at the current 'random' mm, my win rate is 56.3%. If you look at JUST the 40-49 and 50-59 battles, i.e. sbmm, my win rate is 56%. - sbmm will not force your win rate to 50%.  Fact.  

DeviouslyCursed: Nope.   sbmm is only battles with 40-60% chance to win.  So if you look at the 40-49 and 50-59 brackets below, that is sbmm If you look at all the battles, you are looking at the current 'random' mm, my win rate is 56.3%. If you look at JUST the 40-49 and 50-59 battles, i.e. sbmm, my win rate is 56%. - sbmm will not force your win rate to 50%.  Fact.    Whatever system you are using is ranking you at about a 52-53% player. It is underestimating you, so your win chance is actually higher than what is listed in your chart. More likely it is underestimating the platoon you are always playing with. If the system you are using to calculate the win chance is accurate, your mean and median "chance to win" should both be where (or at least near) your overall win rate is. It is not in your chart. It is significantly lower. Drastically lower. But I don't expect someone of your 'statistics caliber' to understand what I'm talking about.

Block Quote  

DeviouslyCursed:

Реклама | Adv