Sandbox : General Feedback

snotvomit, on 15 June 2021 - 10:53 AM, said: Well, I went onto the Sandbox server to test and...   200,000 bonds are in my inventory but ZERO credits and ZERO free exp... which means there's no way I can apply field modifications to test them.   NVM - I logged in a second time and there's loads of credits and free EXP on the account now.


StronkiTonki, on 14 June 2021 - 11:00 PM, said: Absolutely terrible idea.   This only increases the gap between newer and older players, which is just terrible and results into more 5 minute stomps, because tanks in general will statistically become better in the areas that matter.   Here's an idea: Take this entire system, but instead of stat altering options, let players unlock cool visual customizations for their tanks.   As for the loadouts, I'd say ditch all of it with the exception of choosing shell loadouts. Your equipment loadout should be have tradeoffs when your equip your tank. So again, changing it depending on map and battle you get in to will just increase over-all tank performance, since players will have more optimal equipment setups across the board. Shell loadouts is fine. It will mean less players will have to waste spamming premium shells when they're top tier, just because they had a lot of premium shells equipped in the scenario of getting bottom tier.


KanonenVogel19, on 15 June 2021 - 12:04 AM, said:   These changes are completely unnecessary and overcomplicated because:   - It just adds even more grind to an already grindy game. - It does not promote customization since a preferred meta will develop over time. - It reduces the disadvantages of using highly specialized setup.   Additionally it's highly frustrating to see that you're investing time into stuff like this when premium ammo has been shelved and you show no indications of working on it. Even worse, you're now offering a way to save credits for players that go full premium ammo into battle.   In my opinion there are only two good things with this whole circus. 1) Modifications that affect one thing positively and one thing negatively. This is realistic and good for the game. For example, spaced armor offers protection but adds weight. But you could just add this to the already existing equipment instead of adding a whole new future. 2) Category for the second equipment slot. You should make a category for the third equipment slot aswell. And please also make the category bonus apply to improved equipment and bonds equipment if you insist on having them in the game.   And please drop these silly vehicle combat roles. They are not even real but something you made up in your dreams. Honestly, "assault heavy tank" and "breakthrough heavy tank" makes no sense either from a logical perspective or from a descriptive perspective. A breakthrough is just one of possible outcomes of an assault. A heavy tank is still a heavy tank and it can both attack and defend.


michaltank, on 15 June 2021 - 06:45 AM, said:     Yes, shame WG doesn't have anything like UserVoice where players vote for new features and those get declined with a reason or passed forward. This is how the other companies in Tech gather feedback on their applications.


dibbdroid, on 15 June 2021 - 11:24 AM, said: What does this add? A level of confusion and arcade gameplay nobody wants


VanGore78, on 15 June 2021 - 11:26 AM, said: There is A LOT to like here.   The idea of min/maxing tanks is great. Instead of just making tanks better (like wit bounty equipment, crew 2.0 etc) the tuning comes at a cost. That's the way to go!    Giving sense to 30 seconds before the game is even better! Adjusting to your tank to MM or map is a great way to honor players with experience and skill!    I like it! Can't wait to test it!