Absolute Supremacy feedback
Дата: 01.12.2016 14:25:18
shishx_the_animal, on 07 November 2016 - 04:59 PM, said: I believe that the current format really added some fun to the
whole experience. It resembled like the final clan war to end all
clan wars between Russia and Europe (this part was also awesome!).
It added a whole new level of rivalry between the servers and maybe
the next one (possibly advertised more) could prove a real hit.
I also think that most of the players can relate better to
this format since not everyone is tracking ESL/WGL. Oh, and
bigger prizes too. 
Berbo: We'll give our best to do inter regional game(s) again, with
bigger prizes of course. 
Domstadtkerl, on 07 November 2016 - 06:31 PM, said: - Make sure all your dates are the correct playing dates, before
the start of the tournament, especially if its such a long-lasting
tournament. - Dont let the same map be played over and over
in BO5/7/9-matches. Just mix them up and let eacfh team play
Attacker/defender side only once. Especially campy maps such as
Abbey get extremely boring if you have to play them multiple times.
- Get rid of campy maps alltogether (Abbey, Lakeville,
Mountain Pass and such...) - Cover the god dam Show-Match vs
the russians on Twitch! - Make sure the 3rd and 4th place
dont get better rewarded than your 2nd place. (I know this is
whining about better rewards, but still just calculate how much
"Ingame-Currency" equals your 80$ prizemoney per player. 3rd/4th
place got 34k gold per player....). - Get a seeding by
either average Personal Rating or last Tournament results for the
group stages and make a random seed for the play-off-stage, as you
seem toi enjoy the big battles inbetween. (And we all enjoy the
RSOP whining). Or just make everything seeded by avg Personal
Rating, so we at least have a clue by what logic you seed the
play-offs. Last torunament already had that "fishy" tree with KB,
Animals, RSOP and the likes (and our group in group stage with 8
"decent" teams, where other groups only had like 2-3 in each).
Berbo: - Dates were correct from what I can recall, as for the
length of the tournament it was damn too long, next one I hope will
not take more than a 7 days (max 10) - That is impossible, we don't
have this feature in our admin tool, I'd love to have this option
though - This is a bit subjective, some maps will always be campy
or not attractive - We tried, there was a lack of interest from EN
contributors and the one that wanted cancelled 2 days before the
stream - Money rewards are higher than gold ones, we're thinking of
only giving money to 1st place and to balance out other rewards
more correctly. I see your point - Also not available at the
moment, if we ever get this feature we'll try to do skill based
seeding, we want this too I can assure you. Thanks for the
feedback!
KJK, on 07 November 2016 - 08:00 PM, said: First and foremost: thank you for running the tournament. It was
definitely an improvement on the events of the past.
However, communication was somewhat lacking. We weren't sure if our
battles will begin at the advertised hour or not (they were in fact
moved twice). I know the reason: the number of teams, but it would
be nice to know it with a lot more time to prepare, and I do not
mean two hours - more like two days. For one stage a chaps of ours
took a day off work just to find out that the battle will be played
three hours later. Also, could we have more of this guy
please? 
https://clips.twitch...hinocerosTTours Berbo: We're glad you enjoyed it. We hope each one will be better
than a previous one. I'm aware of the seeding day and change
in hours, that was our slip up. Totally should've been done in a
better way as for this guy, yes it's a possibility to have him
again but not sure will he call you a beast again.
matte40, on 07 November 2016 - 08:56 PM, said: Matte Berbo: First of all, supremacy and superiority is just the name
change, the idea and concept is the same. We had issues with
TMS which prevented us from showing battle times on the tournament
page, but everyone got a notification and I'm pretty sure it was
written in the rules, also EVERY day almost we start at 19:00 so I
guess it wasn't a shock for most of guys. We tried with 2
play offs and it didn't really work out well, the best scenario
could be GS+GS+Playoff for the future. Seeding a lot of
teams would create a massive amount of manual work and would be
prone to a lot of mistakes, that's why we only do it on the last
stage when the team count is small. Thanks a lot for taking
time to write a very detailed and extensive feedback and my
apologies for not replying earlier. I put a note as a reminder but
each time something distracted me until today Regards!
Regards!Absolute Supremacy feedback