Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
MrVic
T29/t32 getting nerfed
arrow
22.12.2010 02:24:41
 
Subject: In-Game Vehicles\American Vehicles\Heavy Tanks\T29/t32 getting nerfed
Link on message: #304411

View PostBelrick, on 22 December 2010 - 02:10 AM, said: I look at the stats and i cannot see anything that suggests that the T30 is anywhere near the levels of other tier 10's.
Tell me where i am wrong?
-Same DPS and pen gun as the IS7
-Same Hit points than the IS-7
-SLOWER than the IS7
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour all round bar turret frontal than the IS-7.
-Better DPS than the Maus
-Faster than the Maus
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour than the Maus, in the order of half the amount!
-FAR less HP than the Maus
What am i missing here that makes you devs think that the T30 is up to scratch? It is after all nothing more than a tier 7 armour heavy with a tier 8 TD canon with Tier 10 HP!

MrVic: Review of the US tanks is something that they are working on. Their new sometimes new things end up to powerful or to weak. Then changes get worked on and come into play :)
Give it some time. Their working on a number of problems and its the holidays nothing goes fast around the holidays, well expect the last min shoppers, the rum, the xmas cookies.... well some things goes fast I guess, sadly none of them are easily equip able to a tank ;)
Just a side note (one I am eager to test) T34 and T30 aim time reduction will help a good bit. We'll just have to wait a bit more and see what they come up with.


MrVic
T29/t32 getting nerfed
arrow
22.12.2010 02:24:41
 
Subject: T29/t32 getting nerfed
Link on message: #304411

View PostBelrick, on Dec 22 2010 - 01:10, said: I look at the stats and i cannot see anything that suggests that the T30 is anywhere near the levels of other tier 10's.

Tell me where i am wrong?

-Same DPS and pen gun as the IS7
-Same Hit points than the IS-7

-SLOWER than the IS7
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour all round bar turret frontal than the IS-7.

-Better DPS than the Maus
-Faster than the Maus

-FAR FAR FAR worse armour than the Maus, in the order of half the amount!
-FAR less HP than the Maus


What am i missing here that makes you devs think that the T30 is up to scratch? It is after all nothing more than a tier 7 armour heavy with a tier 8 TD canon with Tier 10 HP!


MrVic:
Review of the US tanks is something that they are working on.  Their new sometimes new things end up to powerful or to weak. Then changes get worked on and come into play :)
Give it some time. Their working on a number of problems and its the holidays nothing goes fast around the holidays, well expect the last min shoppers, the rum, the xmas cookies.... well some things goes fast I guess, sadly none of them are easily equip able to a tank ;)

Just a side note (one I am eager to test)  T34 and T30 aim time reduction will help a good bit. We'll just have to wait a bit more and see what they come up with.


MrVic
T29/t32 getting nerfed
arrow
22.12.2010 02:24:41
 
Subject: T29/t32 getting nerfed
Link on message: #304411

View PostBelrick, on Dec 22 2010 - 01:10, said: I look at the stats and i cannot see anything that suggests that the T30 is anywhere near the levels of other tier 10's.

Tell me where i am wrong?

-Same DPS and pen gun as the IS7
-Same Hit points than the IS-7

-SLOWER than the IS7
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour all round bar turret frontal than the IS-7.

-Better DPS than the Maus
-Faster than the Maus

-FAR FAR FAR worse armour than the Maus, in the order of half the amount!
-FAR less HP than the Maus


What am i missing here that makes you devs think that the T30 is up to scratch? It is after all nothing more than a tier 7 armour heavy with a tier 8 TD canon with Tier 10 HP!


MrVic:
Review of the US tanks is something that they are working on.  Their new sometimes new things end up to powerful or to weak. Then changes get worked on and come into play :)
Give it some time. Their working on a number of problems and its the holidays nothing goes fast around the holidays, well expect the last min shoppers, the rum, the xmas cookies.... well some things goes fast I guess, sadly none of them are easily equip able to a tank ;)

Just a side note (one I am eager to test)  T34 and T30 aim time reduction will help a good bit. We'll just have to wait a bit more and see what they come up with.


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
22.12.2010 00:32:32
 
Subject: News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304245

View Postgrdja, on 22 December 2010 - 12:18 AM, said: Wait wait, why should possibly French tree be in before the British? :(

MrVic: No reason not to. Tanks are tank and we get more tanks = happy :)


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
22.12.2010 00:32:32
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304245

View Postgrdja, on Dec 21 2010 - 23:18, said: Wait wait, why should possibly French tree be in before the British? :(


MrVic:
No reason not to. Tanks are tank and we get more tanks = happy :)


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
22.12.2010 00:32:32
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304245

View Postgrdja, on Dec 21 2010 - 23:18, said: Wait wait, why should possibly French tree be in before the British? :(


MrVic:
No reason not to. Tanks are tank and we get more tanks = happy :)


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
22.12.2010 00:29:53
 
Subject: News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304240

View Poststrata89, on 22 December 2010 - 12:18 AM, said: Omg, how long beta will last? When i joined, release date was anounced to end o this year.
Its already starting to be to long, my garage is full of vehicles and i dont want to play anymore when i know ill loose them all. If open beta (you say its closed but every1 can get the keys) will be there fo another half year, ill propably not play after release and i think a lot of players will do the same.

MrVic: There are release tech trees and full trees... :) Tanks will be added after release... No mention of the beta or release was in that comment btw :)
It was purely about tanks.....

View PostTiny, on 21 December 2010 - 11:58 PM, said: lol, so this beta will last into 2013 or something...keep em coming!
Just enough of the SPG's please :Smile_harp:

MrVic:


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
22.12.2010 00:29:53
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304240

View Poststrata89, on Dec 21 2010 - 23:18, said: Omg, how long beta will last? When i joined, release date was anounced to end o this year.
Its already starting to be to long, my garage is full of vehicles and i dont want to play anymore when i know ill loose them all. If open beta (you say its closed but every1 can get the keys) will be there fo another half year, ill propably not play after release and i think a lot of players will do the same.


MrVic:

View PostTiny, on Dec 21 2010 - 22:58, said: lol, so this beta will last into 2013 or something...keep em coming!

Just enough of the SPG's please  :Smile_harp:


MrVic:


There are release tech trees and full trees... :)   Tanks will be added after release...  No mention of the beta or release was in that comment btw :)
It was purely about tanks.....


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
22.12.2010 00:29:53
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304240

View Poststrata89, on Dec 21 2010 - 23:18, said: Omg, how long beta will last? When i joined, release date was anounced to end o this year.
Its already starting to be to long, my garage is full of vehicles and i dont want to play anymore when i know ill loose them all. If open beta (you say its closed but every1 can get the keys) will be there fo another half year, ill propably not play after release and i think a lot of players will do the same.


MrVic:

View PostTiny, on Dec 21 2010 - 22:58, said: lol, so this beta will last into 2013 or something...keep em coming!

Just enough of the SPG's please  :Smile_harp:


MrVic:


There are release tech trees and full trees... :)   Tanks will be added after release...  No mention of the beta or release was in that comment btw :)
It was purely about tanks.....


Overlord
A Beta Testers Analysis Of World Of Tanks
arrow
22.12.2010 00:26:07
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Impressions\A Beta Testers Analysis Of World Of Tanks
Link on message: #304233

View PostMuleMobile, on 20 December 2010 - 06:55 PM, said: ...
Conclusion
Now even after reading this, or maybe you skipped this wall-of-text rant, you may still be thinking "It's just a game, point is to be balanced and fun, not historically accurate" but then why is it that after a while, the majority of players feel like German tanks are crap, and balance is indeed off?
There are undoubtedly more aspects in this game that affects the performance of tanks that I do not know about and did not comment on butI hope I’ve illustrated and explained enough examples to make you feel this imbalance isn’t coincidental. Agree or disagree, all I ask is that you think for yourself. Take a look at the game with an open mind, and ask yourself if this is a dev team really trying their best to be balanced as they purport to be. I really cannot imagine all these discrepancies are just by chance or mistake, personally I have little faith that this dev team is being fair.
Also keep in mind there are unconfirmed rumours and suspicions that the stats displayed to the user in the game are not true, meaning that the real stats may be even more biased. These are conspiracy theories, nothing concrete, but sometimes when I look at the stats, and look at what happens ingame, I can’t help but wonder...
I have a message to the devs; you should admit your bias. It’s obvious and prevalent everywhere. It may not be anything massively balance-breaking but at almost every aspect it seems things have been tweaked to give the Russians at least a small unfair advantage. Don't you dare say the game is realistic or balanced and people have just been underestimating Soviet and overestimating German tanks. Neither realistic nor balanced, it is disappointing to see such a well made game engine flawed by such rampant bias.
tl;dr: devs are biased and Russian tanks are OP
-Mule

Overlord: The whole analysis of 4837 words boils down to
1) good-old bias
2) unconfirmed rumours on hidden server-side parameters and world conspiracy
The bias towards Soviet tanks, principles of communism, and Marxism–Leninism ideology admitted. Cheers!
Thread closed.


Overlord
Xmas Special 2010 Idea
arrow
21.12.2010 23:21:01
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Suggestions\Xmas Special 2010 Idea
Link on message: #304127

View Postxecute, on 27 November 2010 - 10:03 PM, said: For Xmas Day (24hrs) can we have a map with snow please. Also tanks fire snowballs instead of shells. Lastly, double Experience all day. K, Thanks Santa -xe-

Overlord: It's not difficult to enable snow on the current maps, the problem is that dynamic light effects haven't been optimized yet. That's the main reason why night maps haven't been added.


Overlord
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 23:07:39
 
Subject: News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304102

View PostRaketensegler, on 21 December 2010 - 04:05 PM, said: Afaik a dev said Tier 8 on the Russian Forum and that the gun is 105mm.
The most important thing is still lacking though, I want the E-Serie! :Smile-izmena:
The E-Serie will decide, if I pay money when the game goes live or not, if I see no E-100 or one with a 128mm gun, it's over since I will have nothing to strife for.

Overlord: E-serie won't appear before Q2 2011. US TDs and French tree are going to be added first.


Overlord
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 23:07:39
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304102

View PostRaketensegler, on Dec 21 2010 - 15:05, said: Afaik a dev said Tier 8 on the Russian Forum and that the gun is 105mm.

The most important thing is still lacking though, I want the E-Serie!  :Smile-izmena:

The E-Serie will decide, if I pay money when the game goes live or not, if I see no E-100 or one with a 128mm gun, it's over since I will have nothing to strife for.


Overlord:
E-serie won't appear before Q2 2011. US TDs and French tree are going to be added first.


Overlord
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 23:07:39
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304102

View PostRaketensegler, on Dec 21 2010 - 15:05, said: Afaik a dev said Tier 8 on the Russian Forum and that the gun is 105mm.

The most important thing is still lacking though, I want the E-Serie!  :Smile-izmena:

The E-Serie will decide, if I pay money when the game goes live or not, if I see no E-100 or one with a 128mm gun, it's over since I will have nothing to strife for.


Overlord:
E-serie won't appear before Q2 2011. US TDs and French tree are going to be added first.


Overlord
T-54
arrow
21.12.2010 23:06:00
 
Subject: In-Game Vehicles\Soviet Vehicles\Medium Tanks\T-54
Link on message: #304098

View PostStirlitz, on 21 December 2010 - 05:29 PM, said: Agree, gap between t44 and t54 is extremely high, also because t44 has a very poor performance for being Tier 8. The higher damage is justified though if this thing is supposed to counter IS4 and Minimaus effectively. After all, it would be sad to see Tier 9 mediums to be as useless as T8 meds right now.

Overlord: Tier 9 mediums are usually not capable of fighting tier 9 heavies, we have tested 1vs1, 5vs5 and 15vs15 combinations, 400+ battles all in all. Mediums lost about 70% of the matches.
But tier 9 MTs have good chances fighting tier 8 heavies.


Overlord
T-54
arrow
21.12.2010 23:06:00
 
Subject: T-54
Link on message: #304098

View PostStirlitz, on Dec 21 2010 - 16:29, said: Agree, gap between t44 and t54 is extremely high, also because t44 has a very poor performance for being Tier 8. The higher damage is justified though if this thing is supposed to counter IS4 and Minimaus effectively. After all, it would be sad to see Tier 9 mediums to be as useless as T8 meds right now.


Overlord:
Tier 9 mediums are usually not capable of fighting tier 9 heavies, we have tested 1vs1, 5vs5 and 15vs15 combinations, 400+ battles all in all. Mediums lost about 70% of the matches.

But tier 9 MTs have good chances fighting tier 8 heavies.


Overlord
T-54
arrow
21.12.2010 23:06:00
 
Subject: T-54
Link on message: #304098

View PostStirlitz, on Dec 21 2010 - 16:29, said: Agree, gap between t44 and t54 is extremely high, also because t44 has a very poor performance for being Tier 8. The higher damage is justified though if this thing is supposed to counter IS4 and Minimaus effectively. After all, it would be sad to see Tier 9 mediums to be as useless as T8 meds right now.


Overlord:
Tier 9 mediums are usually not capable of fighting tier 9 heavies, we have tested 1vs1, 5vs5 and 15vs15 combinations, 400+ battles all in all. Mediums lost about 70% of the matches.

But tier 9 MTs have good chances fighting tier 8 heavies.


Overlord
Personal Impressions
arrow
21.12.2010 22:53:45
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Impressions\Personal Impressions
Link on message: #304069

Overlord: Medium tanks (top tiers) will see some significant changes in the upcoming update, including reverse speed increase and hit points boost. It is supposed to bring them back to action.


Overlord
Tier 9 Medium Tank Comparison
arrow
21.12.2010 22:46:20
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Tier 9 Medium Tank Comparison
Link on message: #304056

View PostTrIpMo, on 21 December 2010 - 03:50 PM, said: Lol as I suspected the Russian tank is the best as usual.
I'll wait on the British Centurion if that tank will not be better then the T-54. I know enough.

Overlord: We have tested all 3 mediums in 1vs1 battles and various other combinations. From our point of view there are fairly balanced for this early stage, with few per cent difference perhaps. Not sure that T-54 is the clear leader of the 3. It has more speed and armor, but speed/maneuverability is not that critical and the advantage is not that huge to allow circling around P. II or Pershing, especially in a city,
Better armor? P. II and Pershing are able to penetrate it with no problems, their guns are obviously better.


Overlord
v.0.6.2 preliminary discussion
arrow
21.12.2010 22:35:46
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\v.0.6.2 preliminary discussion
Link on message: #304037

View Postvarrakk, on 20 December 2010 - 04:34 PM, said: How long will the Downtime be on this patch?
A xmas without my tanks will be catastrophic

Overlord: As usual. It shouldn't take long, since we are using RU server as testing ground for releasing updates.


Overlord
v.0.6.2 preliminary discussion
arrow
21.12.2010 22:35:38
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\v.0.6.2 preliminary discussion
Link on message: #304036

View PostJiri_Starrider, on 21 December 2010 - 08:48 PM, said: Questions for the Devs.
From the patch notes - still says - "Projected timeline - to be announced." or "Projected timeline - December." - We are almost done with December, let alone the 20-24th range posted elsewhere, any updates?
Also "Attention! the list of changes is not full." Um, why not? worked with other software development types, like oh, my wife (and many other games), I can't believe the Dev's don't know the full list, so why not post it? Why are we playing "I got a secret" still? Just put a note in (in red, whatever) next to the line item - "possible, may not make patch." We (mostly, there are those entitled types that don't) understand things get moved and delayed.

Overlord: Projected timeline - this week.
We do know the full list, but a more detailed version of it will appear a bit later.


ARGO
What Are Your Dream Tanks?
arrow
21.12.2010 22:08:54
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\What Are Your Dream Tanks?
Link on message: #303994

ARGO: I just wish they would add the WW1 Mark V "Male" tank as the tier 1 tank when drop the UK tank tree in. Would love to have a tank bigger than a toaster for a starter tank. :)


ARGO
The Say Your Sorry Thread
arrow
21.12.2010 22:02:36
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\The Say Your Sorry Thread
Link on message: #303986

ARGO: Why be so impersonal, PM the guy and tell him because a great deal of players do not even look at the forums and at least you'll know he got it.


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 18:26:40
 
Subject: News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303578

View Postkillakanz, on 21 December 2010 - 03:23 PM, said: Lowe!! The one and only premium tank I've ever wanted! *saves gold*
The T28 TD... what the heck? That doesn't look right at all.
The hull front didn't extend that far forward and it had 2 sets of tracks per side...
Posted Image

MrVic: Very early image it's only partially done. Tracks are s minor problem in that image :)
Maybe the tattoo idea is not to crazy...


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 18:26:40
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303578

View Postkillakanz, on Dec 21 2010 - 14:23, said: Lowe!! The one and only premium tank I've ever wanted! *saves gold*
The T28 TD... what the heck? That doesn't look right at all.
The hull front didn't extend that far forward and it had 2 sets of tracks per side...
http://www.the-bluep..._tank-33210.jpg

MrVic: Very early image it's only partially done. Tracks are s minor problem in that image :)
Maybe the tattoo idea is not to crazy...


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 18:26:40
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303578

View Postkillakanz, on Dec 21 2010 - 14:23, said: Lowe!! The one and only premium tank I've ever wanted! *saves gold*
The T28 TD... what the heck? That doesn't look right at all.
The hull front didn't extend that far forward and it had 2 sets of tracks per side...
http://www.the-bluep..._tank-33210.jpg

MrVic: Very early image it's only partially done. Tracks are s minor problem in that image :)
Maybe the tattoo idea is not to crazy...


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 18:22:26
 
Subject: News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303573

View Postjimk, on 21 December 2010 - 01:41 PM, said: Those better be alpha specs or im quiting this game. T-56 is so OP compared to the Panther 2 it looks more like a tier 10 medium.

MrVic: Not sure I can add anymore disclaimers.... Hmm maybe tattoos on members.... Hmm


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 18:22:26
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303573

View Postjimk, on Dec 21 2010 - 12:41, said: Those better be alpha specs or im quiting this game. T-56 is so OP compared to the Panther 2 it looks more like a tier 10 medium.

MrVic: Not sure I can add anymore disclaimers.... Hmm maybe tattoos on members.... Hmm


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 18:22:26
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303573

View Postjimk, on Dec 21 2010 - 12:41, said: Those better be alpha specs or im quiting this game. T-56 is so OP compared to the Panther 2 it looks more like a tier 10 medium.

MrVic: Not sure I can add anymore disclaimers.... Hmm maybe tattoos on members.... Hmm


MrVic
US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
arrow
21.12.2010 18:14:40
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
Link on message: #303558

View Posttheta0123, on 21 December 2010 - 01:56 PM, said: But im not talking about the M60, now am i?
The M46 + M47 would fit perfectly, because it is already for 75% ingame.
To those who dint read the thread=
M46=Exact same as pershing exept for new engine and transmission
M47=Exact same hull as M46/Pershing but with a new turret. Turret was 175mm or so IIRC, so that makes it well balanced with panther II AND T 54

MrVic: He was agreeing with you ;)


ARGO
Rep
arrow
21.12.2010 17:55:50
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Rep
Link on message: #303521

View PostShoshine, on 21 December 2010 - 02:23 PM, said: has no effect its more like the like/dislike on youtube
if you do/say something uber stupid (extreme racism and the like) the mods will use a different system to...re-educate you :Smile_honoring:

ARGO: And Re-Education will be swift and immediate depending on what rules you broke so please make sure you go over the forum/game rules very carefully to avoid angering the mighty banhammer.....If you ever have a problem as well, you can always come to us.
Welcome to WoT, I hope you enjoy it as much as we do....
Argo66


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 08:42:39
 
Subject: News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #302541

View PostQtip, on 21 December 2010 - 08:08 AM, said: Well, lower signal range, lower HP, lower maximum weight, lower penetration and lower horsepower doesn't looks like much of an upgrade to me :Smile_harp:

MrVic: Ahh yeah missing some modules, before when ya mentioned it thought you were talking the gun. Will swap it in new picture tomorrow :) Gun is correct tho


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 08:42:39
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #302541

View PostQtip, on Dec 21 2010 - 07:08, said: Well, lower signal range, lower HP, lower maximum weight, lower penetration and lower horsepower doesn't looks like much of an upgrade to me  :Smile_harp:

MrVic: Ahh yeah missing some modules, before when ya mentioned it thought you were talking the gun.  Will swap it in new picture tomorrow :) Gun is correct tho


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 08:42:39
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #302541

View PostQtip, on Dec 21 2010 - 07:08, said: Well, lower signal range, lower HP, lower maximum weight, lower penetration and lower horsepower doesn't looks like much of an upgrade to me  :Smile_harp:

MrVic: Ahh yeah missing some modules, before when ya mentioned it thought you were talking the gun.  Will swap it in new picture tomorrow :) Gun is correct tho


MrVic
A Beta Testers Analysis Of World Of Tanks
arrow
21.12.2010 07:19:47
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Impressions\A Beta Testers Analysis Of World Of Tanks
Link on message: #302451

MrVic: Well put together post. Very nice post tho. Some parts sound okay others ehhh.
Only thing I wanted to bring up is all of the break down on the guns. Your assuming all weapons function based on their raw weight vs velocity.
Basically you only have part of the equation. Your assuming their all firing lead balls of varying weights, and basing their perspective
damage on that. It throws the comparison off in the end :) Tank rounds have many variables and together they create a weapon profile.
Composition of the round Density/Durability/Hardness then toss in Speed (some times good and even sometimes can be bad) Also the varying amounts of HE composition
in each round directly effects the guns performance. Also adjusts the Mass, less or more metal in the
round for penetration which helps in keeping the round intact to deliver the HE component and be strong enough to not break up on impact.
Mass vs Velocity is only one piece to that puzzle.
Again well written post. Just wanted to help on the Gun break down listed, as right now its way to simple and a bit off :)


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Volume #5
arrow
21.12.2010 06:51:19
 
Subject: News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Volume #5
Link on message: #302438

MrVic: Please continue the server split discussion in the main topic for it :)
http://forum.worldof...cussion-thread/
Thanks


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Volume #5
arrow
21.12.2010 06:51:19
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Volume #5
Link on message: #302438

MrVic: Please continue the server split discussion in the main topic for it :)
http://forum.worldof...cussion-thread/
Thanks


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Volume #5
arrow
21.12.2010 06:51:19
 
Subject: Wot Newsletter Volume #5
Link on message: #302438

MrVic: Please continue the server split discussion in the main topic for it :)
http://forum.worldof...cussion-thread/
Thanks


Tanitha
Is It A Tank Game Or Halo?
arrow
21.12.2010 05:33:00
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Is It A Tank Game Or Halo?
Link on message: #302394

View Postcaptking, on 21 December 2010 - 05:08 AM, said: Neither have Hit Locations...(if so how are internal hits figured)

Tanitha: The tanks have many many hit locations.
Such as this diagram. Each section is a different thickness, and angle, so penetration is calculated depending on the section you hit.
Penetration is determined by physics, such as Armour, angle, etc..
Posted Image
There is also weak spots on tanks, like machine gun ports etc..
Similarly inside the tank there is locations of the critical parts like engine, ammo racks, etc.
These have separate HP's which when they get down to below half, they display as injured, when they are fully destroyed they are red and broken, (until repaired).
Tracks are also getting split into three sections, each with their own hotboxes and hit-points.
Posted Image
I'm not a dev, so i dont know all the internal working of WOT, and I'm not a tank buff so i dont know all the internal workings of tanks.
But I'm sure there is a lot more to wot that you realize. There isn't just one hit box, as you describe above, like I think you assume there is
This is outlined above in some of the specs I linked.
But like has been mentioned above, a shot either penetrates a tank, or it doesn't. Penetration usually results in a dead tank in real life.
But here tanks have hitpoints so they can often last more than one shot.


MrVic
Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
arrow
21.12.2010 05:08:16
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #302372

MrVic: Xmas special up enjoy! and have a happy holidays!
Click me Click me Click me!


Реклама | Adv