Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject:
In-Game Vehicles\American Vehicles\Heavy Tanks\T29/t32 getting nerfed
Link on message: #304411
Belrick, on 22 December 2010 - 02:10 AM, said: I look at the stats and i cannot see anything that suggests that
the T30 is anywhere near the levels of other tier 10's.
Tell me where i am wrong?
-Same DPS and pen gun as the IS7
-Same Hit points than the IS-7
-SLOWER than the IS7
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour all round bar turret frontal than the IS-7.
-Better DPS than the Maus
-Faster than the Maus
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour than the Maus, in the order of half the amount!
-FAR less HP than the Maus
What am i missing here that makes you devs think that the T30 is up to scratch? It is after all nothing more than a tier 7 armour heavy with a tier 8 TD canon with Tier 10 HP!

Link on message: #304411

Tell me where i am wrong?
-Same DPS and pen gun as the IS7
-Same Hit points than the IS-7
-SLOWER than the IS7
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour all round bar turret frontal than the IS-7.
-Better DPS than the Maus
-Faster than the Maus
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour than the Maus, in the order of half the amount!
-FAR less HP than the Maus
What am i missing here that makes you devs think that the T30 is up to scratch? It is after all nothing more than a tier 7 armour heavy with a tier 8 TD canon with Tier 10 HP!
MrVic: Review of the US tanks is something that they are working on. Their
new sometimes new things end up to powerful or to weak. Then
changes get worked on and come into play 
Give it some time. Their working on a number of problems and its the holidays nothing goes fast around the holidays, well expect the last min shoppers, the rum, the xmas cookies.... well some things goes fast I guess, sadly none of them are easily equip able to a tank
Just a side note (one I am eager to test) T34 and T30 aim time reduction will help a good bit. We'll just have to wait a bit more and see what they come up with.

Give it some time. Their working on a number of problems and its the holidays nothing goes fast around the holidays, well expect the last min shoppers, the rum, the xmas cookies.... well some things goes fast I guess, sadly none of them are easily equip able to a tank

Just a side note (one I am eager to test) T34 and T30 aim time reduction will help a good bit. We'll just have to wait a bit more and see what they come up with.
Subject: T29/t32 getting nerfed
Link on message: #304411
Belrick, on Dec 22 2010 - 01:10, said: I look at the stats and i cannot see anything that suggests that
the T30 is anywhere near the levels of other tier 10's.
Tell me where i am wrong?
-Same DPS and pen gun as the IS7
-Same Hit points than the IS-7
-SLOWER than the IS7
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour all round bar turret frontal than the IS-7.
-Better DPS than the Maus
-Faster than the Maus
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour than the Maus, in the order of half the amount!
-FAR less HP than the Maus
What am i missing here that makes you devs think that the T30 is up to scratch? It is after all nothing more than a tier 7 armour heavy with a tier 8 TD canon with Tier 10 HP!
Link on message: #304411

Tell me where i am wrong?
-Same DPS and pen gun as the IS7
-Same Hit points than the IS-7
-SLOWER than the IS7
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour all round bar turret frontal than the IS-7.
-Better DPS than the Maus
-Faster than the Maus
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour than the Maus, in the order of half the amount!
-FAR less HP than the Maus
What am i missing here that makes you devs think that the T30 is up to scratch? It is after all nothing more than a tier 7 armour heavy with a tier 8 TD canon with Tier 10 HP!
MrVic:
Review of the US tanks is something that they are working on. Their new sometimes new things end up to powerful or to weak. Then changes get worked on and come into play
Give it some time. Their working on a number of problems and its the holidays nothing goes fast around the holidays, well expect the last min shoppers, the rum, the xmas cookies.... well some things goes fast I guess, sadly none of them are easily equip able to a tank
Just a side note (one I am eager to test) T34 and T30 aim time reduction will help a good bit. We'll just have to wait a bit more and see what they come up with.
Review of the US tanks is something that they are working on. Their new sometimes new things end up to powerful or to weak. Then changes get worked on and come into play

Give it some time. Their working on a number of problems and its the holidays nothing goes fast around the holidays, well expect the last min shoppers, the rum, the xmas cookies.... well some things goes fast I guess, sadly none of them are easily equip able to a tank

Just a side note (one I am eager to test) T34 and T30 aim time reduction will help a good bit. We'll just have to wait a bit more and see what they come up with.
Subject: T29/t32 getting nerfed
Link on message: #304411
Belrick, on Dec 22 2010 - 01:10, said: I look at the stats and i cannot see anything that suggests that
the T30 is anywhere near the levels of other tier 10's.
Tell me where i am wrong?
-Same DPS and pen gun as the IS7
-Same Hit points than the IS-7
-SLOWER than the IS7
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour all round bar turret frontal than the IS-7.
-Better DPS than the Maus
-Faster than the Maus
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour than the Maus, in the order of half the amount!
-FAR less HP than the Maus
What am i missing here that makes you devs think that the T30 is up to scratch? It is after all nothing more than a tier 7 armour heavy with a tier 8 TD canon with Tier 10 HP!
Link on message: #304411

Tell me where i am wrong?
-Same DPS and pen gun as the IS7
-Same Hit points than the IS-7
-SLOWER than the IS7
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour all round bar turret frontal than the IS-7.
-Better DPS than the Maus
-Faster than the Maus
-FAR FAR FAR worse armour than the Maus, in the order of half the amount!
-FAR less HP than the Maus
What am i missing here that makes you devs think that the T30 is up to scratch? It is after all nothing more than a tier 7 armour heavy with a tier 8 TD canon with Tier 10 HP!
MrVic:
Review of the US tanks is something that they are working on. Their new sometimes new things end up to powerful or to weak. Then changes get worked on and come into play
Give it some time. Their working on a number of problems and its the holidays nothing goes fast around the holidays, well expect the last min shoppers, the rum, the xmas cookies.... well some things goes fast I guess, sadly none of them are easily equip able to a tank
Just a side note (one I am eager to test) T34 and T30 aim time reduction will help a good bit. We'll just have to wait a bit more and see what they come up with.
Review of the US tanks is something that they are working on. Their new sometimes new things end up to powerful or to weak. Then changes get worked on and come into play

Give it some time. Their working on a number of problems and its the holidays nothing goes fast around the holidays, well expect the last min shoppers, the rum, the xmas cookies.... well some things goes fast I guess, sadly none of them are easily equip able to a tank

Just a side note (one I am eager to test) T34 and T30 aim time reduction will help a good bit. We'll just have to wait a bit more and see what they come up with.
Subject:
News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304245
grdja, on 22 December 2010 - 12:18 AM, said: Wait wait, why should possibly French tree be in before the
British? 

Link on message: #304245


MrVic: No reason not to. Tanks are tank and we get more tanks = happy


Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304245
grdja, on Dec 21 2010 - 23:18, said: Wait wait, why should possibly French tree be in before the
British? 
Link on message: #304245


MrVic:
No reason not to. Tanks are tank and we get more tanks = happy
No reason not to. Tanks are tank and we get more tanks = happy

Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304245
grdja, on Dec 21 2010 - 23:18, said: Wait wait, why should possibly French tree be in before the
British? 
Link on message: #304245


MrVic:
No reason not to. Tanks are tank and we get more tanks = happy
No reason not to. Tanks are tank and we get more tanks = happy

Subject:
News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304240
strata89, on 22 December 2010 - 12:18 AM, said: Omg, how long beta will last? When i joined, release date was
anounced to end o this year.
Its already starting to be to long, my garage is full of vehicles and i dont want to play anymore when i know ill loose them all. If open beta (you say its closed but every1 can get the keys) will be there fo another half year, ill propably not play after release and i think a lot of players will do the same.
Tiny, on 21 December 2010 - 11:58 PM, said: lol, so this beta will last into 2013 or something...keep em
coming!
Just enough of the SPG's please

Link on message: #304240

Its already starting to be to long, my garage is full of vehicles and i dont want to play anymore when i know ill loose them all. If open beta (you say its closed but every1 can get the keys) will be there fo another half year, ill propably not play after release and i think a lot of players will do the same.
MrVic: There are release tech trees and full trees...
Tanks will be added after release...
No mention of the beta or release was in that comment btw 
It was purely about tanks.....


It was purely about tanks.....

Just enough of the SPG's please

MrVic:
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304240
strata89, on Dec 21 2010 - 23:18, said: Omg, how long beta will last? When i joined, release date was
anounced to end o this year.
Its already starting to be to long, my garage is full of vehicles and i dont want to play anymore when i know ill loose them all. If open beta (you say its closed but every1 can get the keys) will be there fo another half year, ill propably not play after release and i think a lot of players will do the same.
Tiny, on Dec 21 2010 - 22:58, said: lol, so this beta will last into 2013 or something...keep em
coming!
Just enough of the SPG's please
Link on message: #304240

Its already starting to be to long, my garage is full of vehicles and i dont want to play anymore when i know ill loose them all. If open beta (you say its closed but every1 can get the keys) will be there fo another half year, ill propably not play after release and i think a lot of players will do the same.
MrVic:

Just enough of the SPG's please

MrVic:
There are release tech trees and full trees...
Tanks will be added
after release... No mention of the beta or release was
in that comment btw 
It was purely about tanks.....
There are release tech trees and full trees...


It was purely about tanks.....
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304240
strata89, on Dec 21 2010 - 23:18, said: Omg, how long beta will last? When i joined, release date was
anounced to end o this year.
Its already starting to be to long, my garage is full of vehicles and i dont want to play anymore when i know ill loose them all. If open beta (you say its closed but every1 can get the keys) will be there fo another half year, ill propably not play after release and i think a lot of players will do the same.
Tiny, on Dec 21 2010 - 22:58, said: lol, so this beta will last into 2013 or something...keep em
coming!
Just enough of the SPG's please
Link on message: #304240

Its already starting to be to long, my garage is full of vehicles and i dont want to play anymore when i know ill loose them all. If open beta (you say its closed but every1 can get the keys) will be there fo another half year, ill propably not play after release and i think a lot of players will do the same.
MrVic:

Just enough of the SPG's please

MrVic:
There are release tech trees and full trees...
Tanks will be added
after release... No mention of the beta or release was
in that comment btw 
It was purely about tanks.....
There are release tech trees and full trees...


It was purely about tanks.....
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Impressions\A Beta Testers Analysis Of World Of Tanks
Link on message: #304233
MuleMobile, on 20 December 2010 - 06:55 PM, said: ...
Conclusion
Now even after reading this, or maybe you skipped this wall-of-text rant, you may still be thinking "It's just a game, point is to be balanced and fun, not historically accurate" but then why is it that after a while, the majority of players feel like German tanks are crap, and balance is indeed off?
There are undoubtedly more aspects in this game that affects the performance of tanks that I do not know about and did not comment on butI hope I’ve illustrated and explained enough examples to make you feel this imbalance isn’t coincidental. Agree or disagree, all I ask is that you think for yourself. Take a look at the game with an open mind, and ask yourself if this is a dev team really trying their best to be balanced as they purport to be. I really cannot imagine all these discrepancies are just by chance or mistake, personally I have little faith that this dev team is being fair.
Also keep in mind there are unconfirmed rumours and suspicions that the stats displayed to the user in the game are not true, meaning that the real stats may be even more biased. These are conspiracy theories, nothing concrete, but sometimes when I look at the stats, and look at what happens ingame, I can’t help but wonder...
I have a message to the devs; you should admit your bias. It’s obvious and prevalent everywhere. It may not be anything massively balance-breaking but at almost every aspect it seems things have been tweaked to give the Russians at least a small unfair advantage. Don't you dare say the game is realistic or balanced and people have just been underestimating Soviet and overestimating German tanks. Neither realistic nor balanced, it is disappointing to see such a well made game engine flawed by such rampant bias.
tl;dr: devs are biased and Russian tanks are OP
-Mule

Link on message: #304233

Conclusion
Now even after reading this, or maybe you skipped this wall-of-text rant, you may still be thinking "It's just a game, point is to be balanced and fun, not historically accurate" but then why is it that after a while, the majority of players feel like German tanks are crap, and balance is indeed off?
There are undoubtedly more aspects in this game that affects the performance of tanks that I do not know about and did not comment on butI hope I’ve illustrated and explained enough examples to make you feel this imbalance isn’t coincidental. Agree or disagree, all I ask is that you think for yourself. Take a look at the game with an open mind, and ask yourself if this is a dev team really trying their best to be balanced as they purport to be. I really cannot imagine all these discrepancies are just by chance or mistake, personally I have little faith that this dev team is being fair.
Also keep in mind there are unconfirmed rumours and suspicions that the stats displayed to the user in the game are not true, meaning that the real stats may be even more biased. These are conspiracy theories, nothing concrete, but sometimes when I look at the stats, and look at what happens ingame, I can’t help but wonder...
I have a message to the devs; you should admit your bias. It’s obvious and prevalent everywhere. It may not be anything massively balance-breaking but at almost every aspect it seems things have been tweaked to give the Russians at least a small unfair advantage. Don't you dare say the game is realistic or balanced and people have just been underestimating Soviet and overestimating German tanks. Neither realistic nor balanced, it is disappointing to see such a well made game engine flawed by such rampant bias.
tl;dr: devs are biased and Russian tanks are OP
-Mule
Overlord: The whole analysis of 4837 words boils down to
1) good-old bias
2) unconfirmed rumours on hidden server-side parameters and world conspiracy
The bias towards Soviet tanks, principles of communism, and Marxism–Leninism ideology admitted. Cheers!
Thread closed.
1) good-old bias
2) unconfirmed rumours on hidden server-side parameters and world conspiracy
The bias towards Soviet tanks, principles of communism, and Marxism–Leninism ideology admitted. Cheers!
Thread closed.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Suggestions\Xmas Special 2010 Idea
Link on message: #304127
xecute, on 27 November 2010 - 10:03 PM, said: For Xmas Day (24hrs) can we have a map with snow please. Also tanks
fire snowballs instead of shells. Lastly, double Experience all
day. K, Thanks Santa -xe-

Link on message: #304127

Overlord: It's not difficult to enable snow on the current maps, the problem
is that dynamic light effects haven't been optimized yet. That's
the main reason why night maps haven't been added.
Subject:
News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304102
Raketensegler, on 21 December 2010 - 04:05 PM, said: Afaik a dev said Tier 8 on the Russian Forum and that the gun is
105mm.
The most important thing is still lacking though, I want the E-Serie!
The E-Serie will decide, if I pay money when the game goes live or not, if I see no E-100 or one with a 128mm gun, it's over since I will have nothing to strife for.

Link on message: #304102

The most important thing is still lacking though, I want the E-Serie!

The E-Serie will decide, if I pay money when the game goes live or not, if I see no E-100 or one with a 128mm gun, it's over since I will have nothing to strife for.
Overlord: E-serie won't appear before Q2 2011. US TDs and French tree are
going to be added first.
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304102
Raketensegler, on Dec 21 2010 - 15:05, said: Afaik a dev said Tier 8 on the Russian Forum and that the gun is
105mm.
The most important thing is still lacking though, I want the E-Serie!
The E-Serie will decide, if I pay money when the game goes live or not, if I see no E-100 or one with a 128mm gun, it's over since I will have nothing to strife for.
Link on message: #304102

The most important thing is still lacking though, I want the E-Serie!

The E-Serie will decide, if I pay money when the game goes live or not, if I see no E-100 or one with a 128mm gun, it's over since I will have nothing to strife for.
Overlord:
E-serie won't appear before Q2 2011. US TDs and French tree are going to be added first.
E-serie won't appear before Q2 2011. US TDs and French tree are going to be added first.
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #304102
Raketensegler, on Dec 21 2010 - 15:05, said: Afaik a dev said Tier 8 on the Russian Forum and that the gun is
105mm.
The most important thing is still lacking though, I want the E-Serie!
The E-Serie will decide, if I pay money when the game goes live or not, if I see no E-100 or one with a 128mm gun, it's over since I will have nothing to strife for.
Link on message: #304102

The most important thing is still lacking though, I want the E-Serie!

The E-Serie will decide, if I pay money when the game goes live or not, if I see no E-100 or one with a 128mm gun, it's over since I will have nothing to strife for.
Overlord:
E-serie won't appear before Q2 2011. US TDs and French tree are going to be added first.
E-serie won't appear before Q2 2011. US TDs and French tree are going to be added first.
Subject:
In-Game Vehicles\Soviet Vehicles\Medium Tanks\T-54
Link on message: #304098
Stirlitz, on 21 December 2010 - 05:29 PM, said: Agree, gap between t44 and t54 is extremely high, also because t44
has a very poor performance for being Tier 8. The higher damage is
justified though if this thing is supposed to counter IS4 and
Minimaus effectively. After all, it would be sad to see Tier 9
mediums to be as useless as T8 meds right now.

Link on message: #304098

Overlord: Tier 9 mediums are usually not capable of fighting tier 9 heavies,
we have tested 1vs1, 5vs5 and 15vs15 combinations, 400+ battles all
in all. Mediums lost about 70% of the matches.
But tier 9 MTs have good chances fighting tier 8 heavies.
But tier 9 MTs have good chances fighting tier 8 heavies.
Subject: T-54
Link on message: #304098
Stirlitz, on Dec 21 2010 - 16:29, said: Agree, gap between t44 and t54 is extremely high, also because t44
has a very poor performance for being Tier 8. The higher damage is
justified though if this thing is supposed to counter IS4 and
Minimaus effectively. After all, it would be sad to see Tier 9
mediums to be as useless as T8 meds right now.
Link on message: #304098

Overlord:
Tier 9 mediums are usually not capable of fighting tier 9 heavies, we have tested 1vs1, 5vs5 and 15vs15 combinations, 400+ battles all in all. Mediums lost about 70% of the matches.
But tier 9 MTs have good chances fighting tier 8 heavies.
Tier 9 mediums are usually not capable of fighting tier 9 heavies, we have tested 1vs1, 5vs5 and 15vs15 combinations, 400+ battles all in all. Mediums lost about 70% of the matches.
But tier 9 MTs have good chances fighting tier 8 heavies.
Subject: T-54
Link on message: #304098
Stirlitz, on Dec 21 2010 - 16:29, said: Agree, gap between t44 and t54 is extremely high, also because t44
has a very poor performance for being Tier 8. The higher damage is
justified though if this thing is supposed to counter IS4 and
Minimaus effectively. After all, it would be sad to see Tier 9
mediums to be as useless as T8 meds right now.
Link on message: #304098

Overlord:
Tier 9 mediums are usually not capable of fighting tier 9 heavies, we have tested 1vs1, 5vs5 and 15vs15 combinations, 400+ battles all in all. Mediums lost about 70% of the matches.
But tier 9 MTs have good chances fighting tier 8 heavies.
Tier 9 mediums are usually not capable of fighting tier 9 heavies, we have tested 1vs1, 5vs5 and 15vs15 combinations, 400+ battles all in all. Mediums lost about 70% of the matches.
But tier 9 MTs have good chances fighting tier 8 heavies.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Impressions\Personal Impressions
Link on message: #304069

Link on message: #304069
Overlord: Medium tanks (top tiers) will see some significant changes in the
upcoming update, including reverse speed increase and hit points
boost. It is supposed to bring them back to action.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Tier 9 Medium Tank Comparison
Link on message: #304056
TrIpMo, on 21 December 2010 - 03:50 PM, said: Lol as I suspected the Russian tank is the best as usual.
I'll wait on the British Centurion if that tank will not be better then the T-54. I know enough.

Link on message: #304056

I'll wait on the British Centurion if that tank will not be better then the T-54. I know enough.
Overlord: We have tested all 3 mediums in 1vs1 battles and various other
combinations. From our point of view there are fairly balanced for
this early stage, with few per cent difference perhaps. Not sure
that T-54 is the clear leader of the 3. It has more speed and
armor, but speed/maneuverability is not that critical and the
advantage is not that huge to allow circling around P. II or
Pershing, especially in a city,
Better armor? P. II and Pershing are able to penetrate it with no problems, their guns are obviously better.
Better armor? P. II and Pershing are able to penetrate it with no problems, their guns are obviously better.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\v.0.6.2 preliminary discussion
Link on message: #304037
varrakk, on 20 December 2010 - 04:34 PM, said: How long will the Downtime be on this patch?
A xmas without my tanks will be catastrophic

Link on message: #304037

A xmas without my tanks will be catastrophic
Overlord: As usual. It shouldn't take long, since we are using RU server as
testing ground for releasing updates.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\v.0.6.2 preliminary discussion
Link on message: #304036
Jiri_Starrider, on 21 December 2010 - 08:48 PM, said: Questions for the Devs.
From the patch notes - still says - "Projected timeline - to be announced." or "Projected timeline - December." - We are almost done with December, let alone the 20-24th range posted elsewhere, any updates?
Also "Attention! the list of changes is not full." Um, why not? worked with other software development types, like oh, my wife (and many other games), I can't believe the Dev's don't know the full list, so why not post it? Why are we playing "I got a secret" still? Just put a note in (in red, whatever) next to the line item - "possible, may not make patch." We (mostly, there are those entitled types that don't) understand things get moved and delayed.

Link on message: #304036

From the patch notes - still says - "Projected timeline - to be announced." or "Projected timeline - December." - We are almost done with December, let alone the 20-24th range posted elsewhere, any updates?
Also "Attention! the list of changes is not full." Um, why not? worked with other software development types, like oh, my wife (and many other games), I can't believe the Dev's don't know the full list, so why not post it? Why are we playing "I got a secret" still? Just put a note in (in red, whatever) next to the line item - "possible, may not make patch." We (mostly, there are those entitled types that don't) understand things get moved and delayed.
Overlord: Projected timeline - this week.
We do know the full list, but a more detailed version of it will appear a bit later.
We do know the full list, but a more detailed version of it will appear a bit later.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\What Are Your Dream Tanks?
Link on message: #303994

Link on message: #303994
ARGO: I just wish they would add the WW1 Mark V "Male" tank as the tier 1
tank when drop the UK tank tree in. Would love to have a tank
bigger than a toaster for a starter tank. 

Subject:
Archives\Beta\The Say Your Sorry Thread
Link on message: #303986

Link on message: #303986
ARGO: Why be so impersonal, PM the guy and tell him because a great deal
of players do not even look at the forums and at least you'll know
he got it.
Subject:
News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303578
killakanz, on 21 December 2010 - 03:23 PM, said: Lowe!! The one and only premium tank I've ever wanted! *saves
gold*
The T28 TD... what the heck? That doesn't look right at all.
The hull front didn't extend that far forward and it had 2 sets of tracks per side...


Link on message: #303578

The T28 TD... what the heck? That doesn't look right at all.
The hull front didn't extend that far forward and it had 2 sets of tracks per side...

MrVic: Very early image it's only partially done. Tracks are s minor
problem in that image 
Maybe the tattoo idea is not to crazy...

Maybe the tattoo idea is not to crazy...
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303578
killakanz, on Dec 21 2010 - 14:23, said: Lowe!! The one and only premium tank I've ever wanted! *saves
gold*
The T28 TD... what the heck? That doesn't look right at all.
The hull front didn't extend that far forward and it had 2 sets of tracks per side...
http://www.the-bluep..._tank-33210.jpg
Link on message: #303578

The T28 TD... what the heck? That doesn't look right at all.
The hull front didn't extend that far forward and it had 2 sets of tracks per side...
http://www.the-bluep..._tank-33210.jpg
MrVic: Very early image it's only partially done. Tracks are s minor
problem in that image 
Maybe the tattoo idea is not to crazy...

Maybe the tattoo idea is not to crazy...
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303578
killakanz, on Dec 21 2010 - 14:23, said: Lowe!! The one and only premium tank I've ever wanted! *saves
gold*
The T28 TD... what the heck? That doesn't look right at all.
The hull front didn't extend that far forward and it had 2 sets of tracks per side...
http://www.the-bluep..._tank-33210.jpg
Link on message: #303578

The T28 TD... what the heck? That doesn't look right at all.
The hull front didn't extend that far forward and it had 2 sets of tracks per side...
http://www.the-bluep..._tank-33210.jpg
MrVic: Very early image it's only partially done. Tracks are s minor
problem in that image 
Maybe the tattoo idea is not to crazy...

Maybe the tattoo idea is not to crazy...
Subject:
News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303573
jimk, on 21 December 2010 - 01:41 PM, said: Those better be alpha specs or im quiting this game. T-56 is so OP
compared to the Panther 2 it looks more like a tier 10 medium.

Link on message: #303573

MrVic: Not sure I can add anymore disclaimers.... Hmm maybe tattoos on
members.... Hmm
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303573
jimk, on Dec 21 2010 - 12:41, said: Those better be alpha specs or im quiting this game. T-56 is so OP
compared to the Panther 2 it looks more like a tier 10 medium.
Link on message: #303573

MrVic: Not sure I can add anymore disclaimers.... Hmm maybe tattoos on
members.... Hmm
Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #303573
jimk, on Dec 21 2010 - 12:41, said: Those better be alpha specs or im quiting this game. T-56 is so OP
compared to the Panther 2 it looks more like a tier 10 medium.
Link on message: #303573

MrVic: Not sure I can add anymore disclaimers.... Hmm maybe tattoos on
members.... Hmm
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
Link on message: #303558
theta0123, on 21 December 2010 - 01:56 PM, said: But im not talking about the M60, now am i?
The M46 + M47 would fit perfectly, because it is already for 75% ingame.
To those who dint read the thread=
M46=Exact same as pershing exept for new engine and transmission
M47=Exact same hull as M46/Pershing but with a new turret. Turret was 175mm or so IIRC, so that makes it well balanced with panther II AND T 54

Link on message: #303558

The M46 + M47 would fit perfectly, because it is already for 75% ingame.
To those who dint read the thread=
M46=Exact same as pershing exept for new engine and transmission
M47=Exact same hull as M46/Pershing but with a new turret. Turret was 175mm or so IIRC, so that makes it well balanced with panther II AND T 54
MrVic: He was agreeing with you 

Subject:
Archives\Beta\Rep
Link on message: #303521
Shoshine, on 21 December 2010 - 02:23 PM, said: has no effect its more like the like/dislike on youtube
if you do/say something uber stupid (extreme racism and the like) the mods will use a different system to...re-educate you

Link on message: #303521

if you do/say something uber stupid (extreme racism and the like) the mods will use a different system to...re-educate you

ARGO: And Re-Education will be swift and immediate depending on what
rules you broke so please make sure you go over the forum/game
rules very carefully to avoid angering the mighty banhammer.....If
you ever have a problem as well, you can always come to us.
Welcome to WoT, I hope you enjoy it as much as we do....
Argo66
Welcome to WoT, I hope you enjoy it as much as we do....
Argo66
Subject:
News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #302541
Qtip, on 21 December 2010 - 08:08 AM, said: Well, lower signal range, lower HP, lower maximum weight, lower
penetration and lower horsepower doesn't looks like much of an
upgrade to me 

Link on message: #302541


MrVic: Ahh yeah missing some modules, before when ya mentioned it thought
you were talking the gun. Will swap it in new picture tomorrow
Gun is correct tho

Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #302541
Qtip, on Dec 21 2010 - 07:08, said: Well, lower signal range, lower HP, lower maximum weight, lower
penetration and lower horsepower doesn't looks like much of an
upgrade to me 
Link on message: #302541


MrVic: Ahh yeah missing some modules, before when ya mentioned it thought
you were talking the gun. Will swap it in new picture
tomorrow
Gun is correct tho

Subject: Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #302541
Qtip, on Dec 21 2010 - 07:08, said: Well, lower signal range, lower HP, lower maximum weight, lower
penetration and lower horsepower doesn't looks like much of an
upgrade to me 
Link on message: #302541


MrVic: Ahh yeah missing some modules, before when ya mentioned it thought
you were talking the gun. Will swap it in new picture
tomorrow
Gun is correct tho

Subject:
Archives\Beta\Impressions\A Beta Testers Analysis Of World Of Tanks
Link on message: #302451

Link on message: #302451
MrVic: Well put together post. Very nice post tho. Some parts sound okay
others ehhh.
Only thing I wanted to bring up is all of the break down on the guns. Your assuming all weapons function based on their raw weight vs velocity.
Basically you only have part of the equation. Your assuming their all firing lead balls of varying weights, and basing their perspective
damage on that. It throws the comparison off in the end
Tank rounds have many variables and
together they create a weapon profile.
Composition of the round Density/Durability/Hardness then toss in Speed (some times good and even sometimes can be bad) Also the varying amounts of HE composition
in each round directly effects the guns performance. Also adjusts the Mass, less or more metal in the
round for penetration which helps in keeping the round intact to deliver the HE component and be strong enough to not break up on impact.
Mass vs Velocity is only one piece to that puzzle.
Again well written post. Just wanted to help on the Gun break down listed, as right now its way to simple and a bit off
Only thing I wanted to bring up is all of the break down on the guns. Your assuming all weapons function based on their raw weight vs velocity.
Basically you only have part of the equation. Your assuming their all firing lead balls of varying weights, and basing their perspective
damage on that. It throws the comparison off in the end

Composition of the round Density/Durability/Hardness then toss in Speed (some times good and even sometimes can be bad) Also the varying amounts of HE composition
in each round directly effects the guns performance. Also adjusts the Mass, less or more metal in the
round for penetration which helps in keeping the round intact to deliver the HE component and be strong enough to not break up on impact.
Mass vs Velocity is only one piece to that puzzle.
Again well written post. Just wanted to help on the Gun break down listed, as right now its way to simple and a bit off

Subject:
News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Wot Newsletter Volume #5
Link on message: #302438

Link on message: #302438
MrVic: Please continue the server split discussion in the main topic for
it 
http://forum.worldof...cussion-thread/
Thanks

http://forum.worldof...cussion-thread/
Thanks
Subject: Wot Newsletter Volume #5
Link on message: #302438
Link on message: #302438
MrVic: Please continue the server split discussion in the main topic for
it 
http://forum.worldof...cussion-thread/
Thanks

http://forum.worldof...cussion-thread/
Thanks
Subject: Wot Newsletter Volume #5
Link on message: #302438
Link on message: #302438
MrVic: Please continue the server split discussion in the main topic for
it 
http://forum.worldof...cussion-thread/
Thanks

http://forum.worldof...cussion-thread/
Thanks
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Is It A Tank Game Or Halo?
Link on message: #302394
captking, on 21 December 2010 - 05:08 AM, said: Neither have Hit Locations...(if so how are internal hits figured)

Link on message: #302394

Tanitha: The tanks have many many hit locations.
Such as this diagram. Each section is a different thickness, and angle, so penetration is calculated depending on the section you hit.
Penetration is determined by physics, such as Armour, angle, etc..

There is also weak spots on tanks, like machine gun ports etc..
Similarly inside the tank there is locations of the critical parts like engine, ammo racks, etc.
These have separate HP's which when they get down to below half, they display as injured, when they are fully destroyed they are red and broken, (until repaired).
Tracks are also getting split into three sections, each with their own hotboxes and hit-points.

I'm not a dev, so i dont know all the internal working of WOT, and I'm not a tank buff so i dont know all the internal workings of tanks.
But I'm sure there is a lot more to wot that you realize. There isn't just one hit box, as you describe above, like I think you assume there is
This is outlined above in some of the specs I linked.
But like has been mentioned above, a shot either penetrates a tank, or it doesn't. Penetration usually results in a dead tank in real life.
But here tanks have hitpoints so they can often last more than one shot.
Such as this diagram. Each section is a different thickness, and angle, so penetration is calculated depending on the section you hit.
Penetration is determined by physics, such as Armour, angle, etc..

There is also weak spots on tanks, like machine gun ports etc..
Similarly inside the tank there is locations of the critical parts like engine, ammo racks, etc.
These have separate HP's which when they get down to below half, they display as injured, when they are fully destroyed they are red and broken, (until repaired).
Tracks are also getting split into three sections, each with their own hotboxes and hit-points.

I'm not a dev, so i dont know all the internal working of WOT, and I'm not a tank buff so i dont know all the internal workings of tanks.
But I'm sure there is a lot more to wot that you realize. There isn't just one hit box, as you describe above, like I think you assume there is
This is outlined above in some of the specs I linked.
But like has been mentioned above, a shot either penetrates a tank, or it doesn't. Penetration usually results in a dead tank in real life.
But here tanks have hitpoints so they can often last more than one shot.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Wot Newsletter Xmas Special!
Link on message: #302372

Link on message: #302372
MrVic: Xmas special up enjoy! and have a happy holidays!
Click me Click me Click me!
Click me Click me Click me!
Реклама | Adv