Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Link on message: #2671484
Link on message: #2671484
Vallter: 23 today only. Will try to answer more tomorrow
Subject: Recurring competition issues - discussing the problems & solutions.
Link on message: #2671407
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:37, said: Which is very valid because I too was unaware.
Link on message: #2671407
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:37, said: Which is very valid because I too was unaware.lord_farquad: I'll admit, I forgot about the event until I saw the listing, so I
also went and voted for a bunch of categories 
Subject: Recurring competition issues - discussing the problems & solutions.
Link on message: #2671407
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:37, said: Which is very valid because I too was unaware.
Link on message: #2671407
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:37, said: Which is very valid because I too was unaware.lord_farquad:
I'll admit, I forgot about the event until I saw the listing, so I also went and voted for a bunch of categories
I'll admit, I forgot about the event until I saw the listing, so I also went and voted for a bunch of categories
Subject: Recurring competition issues - discussing the problems & solutions.
Link on message: #2671407
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:37, said: Which is very valid because I too was unaware.
Link on message: #2671407
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:37, said: Which is very valid because I too was unaware.lord_farquad:
I'll admit, I forgot about the event until I saw the listing, so I also went and voted for a bunch of categories
I'll admit, I forgot about the event until I saw the listing, so I also went and voted for a bunch of categories
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2671402
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:37, said: E-sports federation? The ref said he was wargaming...but I suppose
he didn't understand what I was trying to communicate. My
apologies, again WG, especially WG NA, WG Germany and Pavel did a
great job with what they had.
Link on message: #2671402
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:37, said: E-sports federation? The ref said he was wargaming...but I suppose
he didn't understand what I was trying to communicate. My
apologies, again WG, especially WG NA, WG Germany and Pavel did a
great job with what they had.lord_farquad: Yeah, I think he was from the eSports federation.... about which I
will make no comment 
And thank you, we really did try to do the best with what we had.
....on another note, expect more (large) events being run in the NA
And thank you, we really did try to do the best with what we had.
....on another note, expect more (large) events being run in the NA
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2671402
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:37, said: E-sports federation? The ref said he was wargaming...but I suppose
he didn't understand what I was trying to communicate. My
apologies, again WG, especially WG NA, WG Germany and Pavel did a
great job with what they had.
Link on message: #2671402
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:37, said: E-sports federation? The ref said he was wargaming...but I suppose
he didn't understand what I was trying to communicate. My
apologies, again WG, especially WG NA, WG Germany and Pavel did a
great job with what they had.lord_farquad:
Yeah, I think he was from the eSports federation.... about which I will make no comment
And thank you, we really did try to do the best with what we had.
....on another note, expect more (large) events being run in the NA
Yeah, I think he was from the eSports federation.... about which I will make no comment
And thank you, we really did try to do the best with what we had.
....on another note, expect more (large) events being run in the NA
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2671402
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:37, said: E-sports federation? The ref said he was wargaming...but I suppose
he didn't understand what I was trying to communicate. My
apologies, again WG, especially WG NA, WG Germany and Pavel did a
great job with what they had.
Link on message: #2671402
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:37, said: E-sports federation? The ref said he was wargaming...but I suppose
he didn't understand what I was trying to communicate. My
apologies, again WG, especially WG NA, WG Germany and Pavel did a
great job with what they had.lord_farquad:
Yeah, I think he was from the eSports federation.... about which I will make no comment
And thank you, we really did try to do the best with what we had.
....on another note, expect more (large) events being run in the NA
Yeah, I think he was from the eSports federation.... about which I will make no comment
And thank you, we really did try to do the best with what we had.
....on another note, expect more (large) events being run in the NA
Subject: Recurring competition issues - discussing the problems & solutions.
Link on message: #2671388
ed_anger, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:27, said: this. if you schedule a competition, you should have someone who
can watch over it and take care of issues, esp if the main
organizer is out of town, on a plane, whatever. otherwise dont
schedule overlapping events or events when no one will be able to
oversee. this has been a problem in the past as well, please fix
it.
Link on message: #2671388
ed_anger, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:27, said: this. if you schedule a competition, you should have someone who
can watch over it and take care of issues, esp if the main
organizer is out of town, on a plane, whatever. otherwise dont
schedule overlapping events or events when no one will be able to
oversee. this has been a problem in the past as well, please fix
it.lord_farquad: We did, and again, my lack of internet was neither intended nor
expected. It's easy to look back and understand what went wrong,
but it would have been extremely difficult to predict the series of
events that led to it (like my adapter breaking, the hotel being
out of 110 adapters, and the hotel not giving me an internet card,
etc.). I still am sorry that there was an issue and we
will be better prepared next time.
Subject: Recurring competition issues - discussing the problems & solutions.
Link on message: #2671388
ed_anger, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:27, said: this. if you schedule a competition, you should have someone who
can watch over it and take care of issues, esp if the main
organizer is out of town, on a plane, whatever. otherwise dont
schedule overlapping events or events when no one will be able to
oversee. this has been a problem in the past as well, please fix
it.
Link on message: #2671388
ed_anger, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:27, said: this. if you schedule a competition, you should have someone who
can watch over it and take care of issues, esp if the main
organizer is out of town, on a plane, whatever. otherwise dont
schedule overlapping events or events when no one will be able to
oversee. this has been a problem in the past as well, please fix
it.lord_farquad:
We did, and again, my lack of internet was neither intended nor expected. It's easy to look back and understand what went wrong, but it would have been extremely difficult to predict the series of events that led to it (like my adapter breaking, the hotel being out of 110 adapters, and the hotel not giving me an internet card, etc.). I still am sorry that there was an issue and we will be better prepared next time.
We did, and again, my lack of internet was neither intended nor expected. It's easy to look back and understand what went wrong, but it would have been extremely difficult to predict the series of events that led to it (like my adapter breaking, the hotel being out of 110 adapters, and the hotel not giving me an internet card, etc.). I still am sorry that there was an issue and we will be better prepared next time.
Subject: Recurring competition issues - discussing the problems & solutions.
Link on message: #2671388
ed_anger, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:27, said: this. if you schedule a competition, you should have someone who
can watch over it and take care of issues, esp if the main
organizer is out of town, on a plane, whatever. otherwise dont
schedule overlapping events or events when no one will be able to
oversee. this has been a problem in the past as well, please fix
it.
Link on message: #2671388
ed_anger, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:27, said: this. if you schedule a competition, you should have someone who
can watch over it and take care of issues, esp if the main
organizer is out of town, on a plane, whatever. otherwise dont
schedule overlapping events or events when no one will be able to
oversee. this has been a problem in the past as well, please fix
it.lord_farquad:
We did, and again, my lack of internet was neither intended nor expected. It's easy to look back and understand what went wrong, but it would have been extremely difficult to predict the series of events that led to it (like my adapter breaking, the hotel being out of 110 adapters, and the hotel not giving me an internet card, etc.). I still am sorry that there was an issue and we will be better prepared next time.
We did, and again, my lack of internet was neither intended nor expected. It's easy to look back and understand what went wrong, but it would have been extremely difficult to predict the series of events that led to it (like my adapter breaking, the hotel being out of 110 adapters, and the hotel not giving me an internet card, etc.). I still am sorry that there was an issue and we will be better prepared next time.
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2671367
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:31, said: The cheap headsets would have been fine had it not been for the
obnoxious WG guy going on in Russian over the loudspeaker DURING
the matches.
Another issue that isn't really publicized is that there were 3 independent organizations trying to get everything done. Ural Gavonzavod (Sponsor), Russian esports federation, and WG. None of them talked to each other and each rep gave us completely different answers and none of them knew what the other was doing until a crisis occurs. The entire thing was last minute crisis management - not the best way to do things.
WG did the best they could under the circumstances but were again fighting a battle involving lack of experience (lack of management 101) and a vast communications disconnect between the organizers.
Link on message: #2671367
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:31, said: The cheap headsets would have been fine had it not been for the
obnoxious WG guy going on in Russian over the loudspeaker DURING
the matches.Another issue that isn't really publicized is that there were 3 independent organizations trying to get everything done. Ural Gavonzavod (Sponsor), Russian esports federation, and WG. None of them talked to each other and each rep gave us completely different answers and none of them knew what the other was doing until a crisis occurs. The entire thing was last minute crisis management - not the best way to do things.
WG did the best they could under the circumstances but were again fighting a battle involving lack of experience (lack of management 101) and a vast communications disconnect between the organizers.
lord_farquad: For the record.... the guy going on over the loudspeaker was not
WG. In fact there were very few WG personnel present at the event.
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2671367
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 18:31, said: The cheap headsets would have been fine had it not been for the
obnoxious WG guy going on in Russian over the loudspeaker DURING
the matches.
Another issue that isn't really publicized is that there were 3 independent organizations trying to get everything done. Ural Gavonzavod (Sponsor), Russian esports federation, and WG. None of them talked to each other and each rep gave us completely different answers and none of them knew what the other was doing until a crisis occurs. The entire thing was last minute crisis management - not the best way to do things.
WG did the best they could under the circumstances but were again fighting a battle involving lack of experience (lack of management 101) and a vast communications disconnect between the organizers.
Link on message: #2671367
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 18:31, said: The cheap headsets would have been fine had it not been for the
obnoxious WG guy going on in Russian over the loudspeaker DURING
the matches.Another issue that isn't really publicized is that there were 3 independent organizations trying to get everything done. Ural Gavonzavod (Sponsor), Russian esports federation, and WG. None of them talked to each other and each rep gave us completely different answers and none of them knew what the other was doing until a crisis occurs. The entire thing was last minute crisis management - not the best way to do things.
WG did the best they could under the circumstances but were again fighting a battle involving lack of experience (lack of management 101) and a vast communications disconnect between the organizers.
lord_farquad:
For the record.... the guy going on over the loudspeaker was not WG. In fact there were very few WG personnel present at the event.
For the record.... the guy going on over the loudspeaker was not WG. In fact there were very few WG personnel present at the event.
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2671367
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 18:31, said: The cheap headsets would have been fine had it not been for the
obnoxious WG guy going on in Russian over the loudspeaker DURING
the matches.
Another issue that isn't really publicized is that there were 3 independent organizations trying to get everything done. Ural Gavonzavod (Sponsor), Russian esports federation, and WG. None of them talked to each other and each rep gave us completely different answers and none of them knew what the other was doing until a crisis occurs. The entire thing was last minute crisis management - not the best way to do things.
WG did the best they could under the circumstances but were again fighting a battle involving lack of experience (lack of management 101) and a vast communications disconnect between the organizers.
Link on message: #2671367
Conflict, on Sep 18 2012 - 18:31, said: The cheap headsets would have been fine had it not been for the
obnoxious WG guy going on in Russian over the loudspeaker DURING
the matches.Another issue that isn't really publicized is that there were 3 independent organizations trying to get everything done. Ural Gavonzavod (Sponsor), Russian esports federation, and WG. None of them talked to each other and each rep gave us completely different answers and none of them knew what the other was doing until a crisis occurs. The entire thing was last minute crisis management - not the best way to do things.
WG did the best they could under the circumstances but were again fighting a battle involving lack of experience (lack of management 101) and a vast communications disconnect between the organizers.
lord_farquad:
For the record.... the guy going on over the loudspeaker was not WG. In fact there were very few WG personnel present at the event.
For the record.... the guy going on over the loudspeaker was not WG. In fact there were very few WG personnel present at the event.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671359
BlazeZero, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:18, said: I can certainly understand and appreciate your situation with
regards to this mess and how it was out of YOUR paticular hands but
lets examine the entire situation here LF. We have a screw up with
the scheduling 3 matches into the tournament. Now I'm not sure how
you guys run your tournaments back-end wise but I can only assume
its some sort of an automated system that launches the battles, so
if thats true that means that something got glitched. If its a
person launching these battles than it was just a mistake by that
person. Once the posts started rolling in about the battles not
being in the right time we received a 2 word answer of and I quote
"Fixed it" from General Direction which is, it seems, a standard WG
answer to a big problem. Barely an acknowledgment of the problem
and a 2-3 word response that we shouldn't worry about it anymore.
Now I can understand that dealing with tourney problems may not
exactly be GD's job description but a simple answer of something
like "postponed until our E-Sports manager gets back from moscow"
would have been perfect. Instead we were assured the problem
(whatever it was) was fixed when 4 days later it clearly was not at
all. And finally there was absolutely no warning that the battles
on sunday would still be screwed up. We didn't hear anything until
you got back and said "herp derp I was out of contact, what
happened?" (not trying to be a dick here LF it was just comical
when you poked your head up yesterday and asked what happened).
Now its fantastic that you're hiring another E-sports person dedicated to this stuff and hopefully this means these issues will be few and far between from now on, but can you understand where these things can be made into an even bigger issue when there is no information coming from the dev team over what blew up?
Link on message: #2671359
BlazeZero, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:18, said: I can certainly understand and appreciate your situation with
regards to this mess and how it was out of YOUR paticular hands but
lets examine the entire situation here LF. We have a screw up with
the scheduling 3 matches into the tournament. Now I'm not sure how
you guys run your tournaments back-end wise but I can only assume
its some sort of an automated system that launches the battles, so
if thats true that means that something got glitched. If its a
person launching these battles than it was just a mistake by that
person. Once the posts started rolling in about the battles not
being in the right time we received a 2 word answer of and I quote
"Fixed it" from General Direction which is, it seems, a standard WG
answer to a big problem. Barely an acknowledgment of the problem
and a 2-3 word response that we shouldn't worry about it anymore.
Now I can understand that dealing with tourney problems may not
exactly be GD's job description but a simple answer of something
like "postponed until our E-Sports manager gets back from moscow"
would have been perfect. Instead we were assured the problem
(whatever it was) was fixed when 4 days later it clearly was not at
all. And finally there was absolutely no warning that the battles
on sunday would still be screwed up. We didn't hear anything until
you got back and said "herp derp I was out of contact, what
happened?" (not trying to be a dick here LF it was just comical
when you poked your head up yesterday and asked what happened).Now its fantastic that you're hiring another E-sports person dedicated to this stuff and hopefully this means these issues will be few and far between from now on, but can you understand where these things can be made into an even bigger issue when there is no information coming from the dev team over what blew up?
lord_farquad: Naturally I cannot, nor will not speak for GD, I do have to thank
him however for trying to handle the situation.
Secondly, the dev team has absolutely nothing to do with tournaments, so I'm not sure why they would be saying anything anyways. I've also told you what the issue was, I had no internet access while I was in Moscow. Which unfortunately prevented me from being able to respond in any way.
to some other statements, I think you'll find that if you track the amount of issues we've had, not only are they continually decreasing, but it's not the majority of tournaments. I still apologize for the issues, as I obviously don't want any (and that's what we're trying to achieve), but as one person it's quite difficult to handle the amount of events that occur in relation to World of Tanks eSports... which is exactly why we're expanding on our eSports team.
Secondly, the dev team has absolutely nothing to do with tournaments, so I'm not sure why they would be saying anything anyways. I've also told you what the issue was, I had no internet access while I was in Moscow. Which unfortunately prevented me from being able to respond in any way.
to some other statements, I think you'll find that if you track the amount of issues we've had, not only are they continually decreasing, but it's not the majority of tournaments. I still apologize for the issues, as I obviously don't want any (and that's what we're trying to achieve), but as one person it's quite difficult to handle the amount of events that occur in relation to World of Tanks eSports... which is exactly why we're expanding on our eSports team.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671359
BlazeZero, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:18, said: I can certainly understand and appreciate your situation with
regards to this mess and how it was out of YOUR paticular hands but
lets examine the entire situation here LF. We have a screw up with
the scheduling 3 matches into the tournament. Now I'm not sure how
you guys run your tournaments back-end wise but I can only assume
its some sort of an automated system that launches the battles, so
if thats true that means that something got glitched. If its a
person launching these battles than it was just a mistake by that
person. Once the posts started rolling in about the battles not
being in the right time we received a 2 word answer of and I quote
"Fixed it" from General Direction which is, it seems, a standard WG
answer to a big problem. Barely an acknowledgment of the problem
and a 2-3 word response that we shouldn't worry about it anymore.
Now I can understand that dealing with tourney problems may not
exactly be GD's job description but a simple answer of something
like "postponed until our E-Sports manager gets back from moscow"
would have been perfect. Instead we were assured the problem
(whatever it was) was fixed when 4 days later it clearly was not at
all. And finally there was absolutely no warning that the battles
on sunday would still be screwed up. We didn't hear anything until
you got back and said "herp derp I was out of contact, what
happened?" (not trying to be a dick here LF it was just comical
when you poked your head up yesterday and asked what happened).
Now its fantastic that you're hiring another E-sports person dedicated to this stuff and hopefully this means these issues will be few and far between from now on, but can you understand where these things can be made into an even bigger issue when there is no information coming from the dev team over what blew up?
Link on message: #2671359
BlazeZero, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:18, said: I can certainly understand and appreciate your situation with
regards to this mess and how it was out of YOUR paticular hands but
lets examine the entire situation here LF. We have a screw up with
the scheduling 3 matches into the tournament. Now I'm not sure how
you guys run your tournaments back-end wise but I can only assume
its some sort of an automated system that launches the battles, so
if thats true that means that something got glitched. If its a
person launching these battles than it was just a mistake by that
person. Once the posts started rolling in about the battles not
being in the right time we received a 2 word answer of and I quote
"Fixed it" from General Direction which is, it seems, a standard WG
answer to a big problem. Barely an acknowledgment of the problem
and a 2-3 word response that we shouldn't worry about it anymore.
Now I can understand that dealing with tourney problems may not
exactly be GD's job description but a simple answer of something
like "postponed until our E-Sports manager gets back from moscow"
would have been perfect. Instead we were assured the problem
(whatever it was) was fixed when 4 days later it clearly was not at
all. And finally there was absolutely no warning that the battles
on sunday would still be screwed up. We didn't hear anything until
you got back and said "herp derp I was out of contact, what
happened?" (not trying to be a dick here LF it was just comical
when you poked your head up yesterday and asked what happened).Now its fantastic that you're hiring another E-sports person dedicated to this stuff and hopefully this means these issues will be few and far between from now on, but can you understand where these things can be made into an even bigger issue when there is no information coming from the dev team over what blew up?
lord_farquad:
Naturally I cannot, nor will not speak for GD, I do have to thank him however for trying to handle the situation.
Secondly, the dev team has absolutely nothing to do with tournaments, so I'm not sure why they would be saying anything anyways. I've also told you what the issue was, I had no internet access while I was in Moscow. Which unfortunately prevented me from being able to respond in any way.
to some other statements, I think you'll find that if you track the amount of issues we've had, not only are they continually decreasing, but it's not the majority of tournaments. I still apologize for the issues, as I obviously don't want any (and that's what we're trying to achieve), but as one person it's quite difficult to handle the amount of events that occur in relation to World of Tanks eSports... which is exactly why we're expanding on our eSports team.
Naturally I cannot, nor will not speak for GD, I do have to thank him however for trying to handle the situation.
Secondly, the dev team has absolutely nothing to do with tournaments, so I'm not sure why they would be saying anything anyways. I've also told you what the issue was, I had no internet access while I was in Moscow. Which unfortunately prevented me from being able to respond in any way.
to some other statements, I think you'll find that if you track the amount of issues we've had, not only are they continually decreasing, but it's not the majority of tournaments. I still apologize for the issues, as I obviously don't want any (and that's what we're trying to achieve), but as one person it's quite difficult to handle the amount of events that occur in relation to World of Tanks eSports... which is exactly why we're expanding on our eSports team.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671359
BlazeZero, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:18, said: I can certainly understand and appreciate your situation with
regards to this mess and how it was out of YOUR paticular hands but
lets examine the entire situation here LF. We have a screw up with
the scheduling 3 matches into the tournament. Now I'm not sure how
you guys run your tournaments back-end wise but I can only assume
its some sort of an automated system that launches the battles, so
if thats true that means that something got glitched. If its a
person launching these battles than it was just a mistake by that
person. Once the posts started rolling in about the battles not
being in the right time we received a 2 word answer of and I quote
"Fixed it" from General Direction which is, it seems, a standard WG
answer to a big problem. Barely an acknowledgment of the problem
and a 2-3 word response that we shouldn't worry about it anymore.
Now I can understand that dealing with tourney problems may not
exactly be GD's job description but a simple answer of something
like "postponed until our E-Sports manager gets back from moscow"
would have been perfect. Instead we were assured the problem
(whatever it was) was fixed when 4 days later it clearly was not at
all. And finally there was absolutely no warning that the battles
on sunday would still be screwed up. We didn't hear anything until
you got back and said "herp derp I was out of contact, what
happened?" (not trying to be a dick here LF it was just comical
when you poked your head up yesterday and asked what happened).
Now its fantastic that you're hiring another E-sports person dedicated to this stuff and hopefully this means these issues will be few and far between from now on, but can you understand where these things can be made into an even bigger issue when there is no information coming from the dev team over what blew up?
Link on message: #2671359
BlazeZero, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:18, said: I can certainly understand and appreciate your situation with
regards to this mess and how it was out of YOUR paticular hands but
lets examine the entire situation here LF. We have a screw up with
the scheduling 3 matches into the tournament. Now I'm not sure how
you guys run your tournaments back-end wise but I can only assume
its some sort of an automated system that launches the battles, so
if thats true that means that something got glitched. If its a
person launching these battles than it was just a mistake by that
person. Once the posts started rolling in about the battles not
being in the right time we received a 2 word answer of and I quote
"Fixed it" from General Direction which is, it seems, a standard WG
answer to a big problem. Barely an acknowledgment of the problem
and a 2-3 word response that we shouldn't worry about it anymore.
Now I can understand that dealing with tourney problems may not
exactly be GD's job description but a simple answer of something
like "postponed until our E-Sports manager gets back from moscow"
would have been perfect. Instead we were assured the problem
(whatever it was) was fixed when 4 days later it clearly was not at
all. And finally there was absolutely no warning that the battles
on sunday would still be screwed up. We didn't hear anything until
you got back and said "herp derp I was out of contact, what
happened?" (not trying to be a dick here LF it was just comical
when you poked your head up yesterday and asked what happened).Now its fantastic that you're hiring another E-sports person dedicated to this stuff and hopefully this means these issues will be few and far between from now on, but can you understand where these things can be made into an even bigger issue when there is no information coming from the dev team over what blew up?
lord_farquad:
Naturally I cannot, nor will not speak for GD, I do have to thank him however for trying to handle the situation.
Secondly, the dev team has absolutely nothing to do with tournaments, so I'm not sure why they would be saying anything anyways. I've also told you what the issue was, I had no internet access while I was in Moscow. Which unfortunately prevented me from being able to respond in any way.
to some other statements, I think you'll find that if you track the amount of issues we've had, not only are they continually decreasing, but it's not the majority of tournaments. I still apologize for the issues, as I obviously don't want any (and that's what we're trying to achieve), but as one person it's quite difficult to handle the amount of events that occur in relation to World of Tanks eSports... which is exactly why we're expanding on our eSports team.
Naturally I cannot, nor will not speak for GD, I do have to thank him however for trying to handle the situation.
Secondly, the dev team has absolutely nothing to do with tournaments, so I'm not sure why they would be saying anything anyways. I've also told you what the issue was, I had no internet access while I was in Moscow. Which unfortunately prevented me from being able to respond in any way.
to some other statements, I think you'll find that if you track the amount of issues we've had, not only are they continually decreasing, but it's not the majority of tournaments. I still apologize for the issues, as I obviously don't want any (and that's what we're trying to achieve), but as one person it's quite difficult to handle the amount of events that occur in relation to World of Tanks eSports... which is exactly why we're expanding on our eSports team.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671325
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:09, said: I could've sworn there was someone impersonating you and
broadcasting live footage of Ural Steel from Moscow over the
Internet. [link]
Link on message: #2671325
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:09, said: I could've sworn there was someone impersonating you and
broadcasting live footage of Ural Steel from Moscow over the
Internet. [link]lord_farquad: It doesn't count when someone gives me access through a computer
that is all in Cyrillic and I have no access to any of my tools
(which means I can't do anything anyways).... don't take my word
for it.... ask the teams that were there.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671325
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:09, said:
I could've sworn there was someone impersonating you and broadcasting live footage of Ural Steel from Moscow over the Internet. [link]
Link on message: #2671325
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:09, said: I could've sworn there was someone impersonating you and broadcasting live footage of Ural Steel from Moscow over the Internet. [link]
lord_farquad:
It doesn't count when someone gives me access through a computer that is all in Cyrillic and I have no access to any of my tools (which means I can't do anything anyways).... don't take my word for it.... ask the teams that were there.
It doesn't count when someone gives me access through a computer that is all in Cyrillic and I have no access to any of my tools (which means I can't do anything anyways).... don't take my word for it.... ask the teams that were there.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671325
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:09, said:
I could've sworn there was someone impersonating you and broadcasting live footage of Ural Steel from Moscow over the Internet. [link]
Link on message: #2671325
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:09, said: I could've sworn there was someone impersonating you and broadcasting live footage of Ural Steel from Moscow over the Internet. [link]
lord_farquad:
It doesn't count when someone gives me access through a computer that is all in Cyrillic and I have no access to any of my tools (which means I can't do anything anyways).... don't take my word for it.... ask the teams that were there.
It doesn't count when someone gives me access through a computer that is all in Cyrillic and I have no access to any of my tools (which means I can't do anything anyways).... don't take my word for it.... ask the teams that were there.
Subject: Tutorial Question
Link on message: #2671324
Link on message: #2671324
Gaea: The tutorial has recently been removed from the game as it's being
reworked.
Subject: Tutorial Question
Link on message: #2671324
Link on message: #2671324
Gaea: The tutorial has recently been removed from the game as it's being
reworked.
Subject: Recurring competition issues - discussing the problems & solutions.
Link on message: #2671303
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:17, said: The way I look at it is this. If it has to be solicited then you
really weren't thinking of voting that way. In the same way if my
wife asks how she looks in a certain outfit, I ask "You want the
truth or what you want to hear?" In other words, don't ask me if
you don't want my real answer. In the same way if you have to ask
me to vote for you, I probably was not going to vote for you. If
you do not feel your player base would choose you over another
title then you are not confident in your game is my thought.
Link on message: #2671303
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 21:17, said: The way I look at it is this. If it has to be solicited then you
really weren't thinking of voting that way. In the same way if my
wife asks how she looks in a certain outfit, I ask "You want the
truth or what you want to hear?" In other words, don't ask me if
you don't want my real answer. In the same way if you have to ask
me to vote for you, I probably was not going to vote for you. If
you do not feel your player base would choose you over another
title then you are not confident in your game is my thought.lord_farquad: My counter would be... not everyone is even aware of the awards, so
in some ways it's merely to inform you of them.... just a thought.
Subject: Recurring competition issues - discussing the problems & solutions.
Link on message: #2671303
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:17, said: The way I look at it is this. If it has to be solicited then you
really weren't thinking of voting that way. In the same way if my
wife asks how she looks in a certain outfit, I ask "You want the
truth or what you want to hear?" In other words, don't ask me if
you don't want my real answer. In the same way if you have to ask
me to vote for you, I probably was not going to vote for you. If
you do not feel your player base would choose you over another
title then you are not confident in your game is my thought.
Link on message: #2671303
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:17, said: The way I look at it is this. If it has to be solicited then you
really weren't thinking of voting that way. In the same way if my
wife asks how she looks in a certain outfit, I ask "You want the
truth or what you want to hear?" In other words, don't ask me if
you don't want my real answer. In the same way if you have to ask
me to vote for you, I probably was not going to vote for you. If
you do not feel your player base would choose you over another
title then you are not confident in your game is my thought.lord_farquad:
My counter would be... not everyone is even aware of the awards, so in some ways it's merely to inform you of them.... just a thought.
My counter would be... not everyone is even aware of the awards, so in some ways it's merely to inform you of them.... just a thought.
Subject: Recurring competition issues - discussing the problems & solutions.
Link on message: #2671303
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:17, said: The way I look at it is this. If it has to be solicited then you
really weren't thinking of voting that way. In the same way if my
wife asks how she looks in a certain outfit, I ask "You want the
truth or what you want to hear?" In other words, don't ask me if
you don't want my real answer. In the same way if you have to ask
me to vote for you, I probably was not going to vote for you. If
you do not feel your player base would choose you over another
title then you are not confident in your game is my thought.
Link on message: #2671303
Viper69, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:17, said: The way I look at it is this. If it has to be solicited then you
really weren't thinking of voting that way. In the same way if my
wife asks how she looks in a certain outfit, I ask "You want the
truth or what you want to hear?" In other words, don't ask me if
you don't want my real answer. In the same way if you have to ask
me to vote for you, I probably was not going to vote for you. If
you do not feel your player base would choose you over another
title then you are not confident in your game is my thought.lord_farquad:
My counter would be... not everyone is even aware of the awards, so in some ways it's merely to inform you of them.... just a thought.
My counter would be... not everyone is even aware of the awards, so in some ways it's merely to inform you of them.... just a thought.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671136
trainednoob, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:53, said: As pointed out before, Farquad, the competition organizer, was
(atleast, I presume) extremely busy in Moscow with Ural Steel
during the weekend.
Link on message: #2671136
trainednoob, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:53, said: As pointed out before, Farquad, the competition organizer, was
(atleast, I presume) extremely busy in Moscow with Ural Steel
during the weekend.lord_farquad: Not only was I busy.... but had no internet at all 
On another note, which will soon be announced in GD, we've just hired another eSports team member to help with the scheduling. Obviously it's hard for me to travel, manage live events, and schedule battles so now we'll have someone dedicated to that. This should allow us to avoid the vast majority of these kinds of scheduling issues in the future.
On another note, which will soon be announced in GD, we've just hired another eSports team member to help with the scheduling. Obviously it's hard for me to travel, manage live events, and schedule battles so now we'll have someone dedicated to that. This should allow us to avoid the vast majority of these kinds of scheduling issues in the future.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671136
trainednoob, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:53, said: As pointed out before, Farquad, the competition organizer, was
(atleast, I presume) extremely busy in Moscow with Ural Steel
during the weekend.
Link on message: #2671136
trainednoob, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:53, said: As pointed out before, Farquad, the competition organizer, was
(atleast, I presume) extremely busy in Moscow with Ural Steel
during the weekend.lord_farquad:
Not only was I busy.... but had no internet at all
On another note, which will soon be announced in GD, we've just hired another eSports team member to help with the scheduling. Obviously it's hard for me to travel, manage live events, and schedule battles so now we'll have someone dedicated to that. This should allow us to avoid the vast majority of these kinds of scheduling issues in the future.
Not only was I busy.... but had no internet at all
On another note, which will soon be announced in GD, we've just hired another eSports team member to help with the scheduling. Obviously it's hard for me to travel, manage live events, and schedule battles so now we'll have someone dedicated to that. This should allow us to avoid the vast majority of these kinds of scheduling issues in the future.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671136
trainednoob, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:53, said: As pointed out before, Farquad, the competition organizer, was
(atleast, I presume) extremely busy in Moscow with Ural Steel
during the weekend.
Link on message: #2671136
trainednoob, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:53, said: As pointed out before, Farquad, the competition organizer, was
(atleast, I presume) extremely busy in Moscow with Ural Steel
during the weekend.lord_farquad:
Not only was I busy.... but had no internet at all
On another note, which will soon be announced in GD, we've just hired another eSports team member to help with the scheduling. Obviously it's hard for me to travel, manage live events, and schedule battles so now we'll have someone dedicated to that. This should allow us to avoid the vast majority of these kinds of scheduling issues in the future.
Not only was I busy.... but had no internet at all
On another note, which will soon be announced in GD, we've just hired another eSports team member to help with the scheduling. Obviously it's hard for me to travel, manage live events, and schedule battles so now we'll have someone dedicated to that. This should allow us to avoid the vast majority of these kinds of scheduling issues in the future.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671006
callmesarge, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:08, said: I would say that unless this changes the scores a very important.
Link on message: #2671006
callmesarge, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:08, said: I would say that unless this changes the scores a very important.lord_farquad: While I agree, my immediate concern is to be able to move forward.
If the winning team has in fact won the entire tournament without a
loss.... then all they will have to do is tell me so, and we'll
work through that to get them the extra gold.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671006
callmesarge, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:08, said: I would say that unless this changes the scores a very
important.
Link on message: #2671006
callmesarge, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:08, said: I would say that unless this changes the scores a very
important.lord_farquad:
While I agree, my immediate concern is to be able to move forward. If the winning team has in fact won the entire tournament without a loss.... then all they will have to do is tell me so, and we'll work through that to get them the extra gold.
While I agree, my immediate concern is to be able to move forward. If the winning team has in fact won the entire tournament without a loss.... then all they will have to do is tell me so, and we'll work through that to get them the extra gold.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2671006
callmesarge, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:08, said: I would say that unless this changes the scores a very
important.
Link on message: #2671006
callmesarge, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:08, said: I would say that unless this changes the scores a very
important.lord_farquad:
While I agree, my immediate concern is to be able to move forward. If the winning team has in fact won the entire tournament without a loss.... then all they will have to do is tell me so, and we'll work through that to get them the extra gold.
While I agree, my immediate concern is to be able to move forward. If the winning team has in fact won the entire tournament without a loss.... then all they will have to do is tell me so, and we'll work through that to get them the extra gold.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2670874
Rager1st, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:00, said: The battle which would have been fought at 6PM Pacific time on the
14th. That is the true "scheduled" battle.
Link on message: #2670874
Rager1st, on Sep 18 2012 - 20:00, said: The battle which would have been fought at 6PM Pacific time on the
14th. That is the true "scheduled" battle.lord_farquad: Correct, I should have put it "Announced Time." Generally speaking
if a battle goes off at a time that was not posted or announced it
is considered an error and not counted.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2670874
Rager1st, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:00, said: The battle which would have been fought at 6PM Pacific time on the
14th. That is the true "scheduled" battle.
Link on message: #2670874
Rager1st, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:00, said: The battle which would have been fought at 6PM Pacific time on the
14th. That is the true "scheduled" battle.lord_farquad:
Correct, I should have put it "Announced Time." Generally speaking if a battle goes off at a time that was not posted or announced it is considered an error and not counted.
Correct, I should have put it "Announced Time." Generally speaking if a battle goes off at a time that was not posted or announced it is considered an error and not counted.
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2670874
Rager1st, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:00, said: The battle which would have been fought at 6PM Pacific time on the
14th. That is the true "scheduled" battle.
Link on message: #2670874
Rager1st, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:00, said: The battle which would have been fought at 6PM Pacific time on the
14th. That is the true "scheduled" battle.lord_farquad:
Correct, I should have put it "Announced Time." Generally speaking if a battle goes off at a time that was not posted or announced it is considered an error and not counted.
Correct, I should have put it "Announced Time." Generally speaking if a battle goes off at a time that was not posted or announced it is considered an error and not counted.
Subject: Arracourt Ante meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2670851
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:35, said: Well I've sacrificed the past 3 evenings of my personal life to
commit time during the usual scheduled times for the Skirmish XVI
championship round and that skirmish schedule hadn't been updated
and the battle didn't pop up for close to half a week now already.
Because of that scheduling mishap in addition to the post-meridian
mishap popping at the anti-meridian time the other day I assumed
since the Anti-Meridian tournament page didn't have a scheduled
day/time in place that it wasn't going to occur either without some
adequate notice. Someone must've updated the schedule 8 or less
hours prior to the actual battle time because when I had last
checked it there was nothing scheduled.
The result was 2 of our substitute players playing after purchasing alternative tanks at the last minute and not able to compete with what we had practiced and planned for. The frustrating thing is the time, money (gold) and effort we as players invest in preparing for these events and the competition organizers don't even have the courtesy to give us adequate notification about the rescheduled dates/times on these events after these recurring schedule screw ups.
Link on message: #2670851
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:35, said: Well I've sacrificed the past 3 evenings of my personal life to
commit time during the usual scheduled times for the Skirmish XVI
championship round and that skirmish schedule hadn't been updated
and the battle didn't pop up for close to half a week now already.
Because of that scheduling mishap in addition to the post-meridian
mishap popping at the anti-meridian time the other day I assumed
since the Anti-Meridian tournament page didn't have a scheduled
day/time in place that it wasn't going to occur either without some
adequate notice. Someone must've updated the schedule 8 or less
hours prior to the actual battle time because when I had last
checked it there was nothing scheduled.The result was 2 of our substitute players playing after purchasing alternative tanks at the last minute and not able to compete with what we had practiced and planned for. The frustrating thing is the time, money (gold) and effort we as players invest in preparing for these events and the competition organizers don't even have the courtesy to give us adequate notification about the rescheduled dates/times on these events after these recurring schedule screw ups.
lord_farquad: Sorry for the issues caused this past weekend. As I mentioned in
the PM thread, I unfortunately had no internet while in Moscow for
Ural Steel, and was unaware that scheduling issues were occurring.
Subject: Arracourt Ante meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2670851
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 18:35, said: Well I've sacrificed the past 3 evenings of my personal life to
commit time during the usual scheduled times for the Skirmish XVI
championship round and that skirmish schedule hadn't been updated
and the battle didn't pop up for close to half a week now already.
Because of that scheduling mishap in addition to the post-meridian
mishap popping at the anti-meridian time the other day I assumed
since the Anti-Meridian tournament page didn't have a scheduled
day/time in place that it wasn't going to occur either without some
adequate notice. Someone must've updated the schedule 8 or less
hours prior to the actual battle time because when I had last
checked it there was nothing scheduled.
The result was 2 of our substitute players playing after purchasing alternative tanks at the last minute and not able to compete with what we had practiced and planned for. The frustrating thing is the time, money (gold) and effort we as players invest in preparing for these events and the competition organizers don't even have the courtesy to give us adequate notification about the rescheduled dates/times on these events after these recurring schedule screw ups.
Link on message: #2670851
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 18:35, said: Well I've sacrificed the past 3 evenings of my personal life to
commit time during the usual scheduled times for the Skirmish XVI
championship round and that skirmish schedule hadn't been updated
and the battle didn't pop up for close to half a week now already.
Because of that scheduling mishap in addition to the post-meridian
mishap popping at the anti-meridian time the other day I assumed
since the Anti-Meridian tournament page didn't have a scheduled
day/time in place that it wasn't going to occur either without some
adequate notice. Someone must've updated the schedule 8 or less
hours prior to the actual battle time because when I had last
checked it there was nothing scheduled.The result was 2 of our substitute players playing after purchasing alternative tanks at the last minute and not able to compete with what we had practiced and planned for. The frustrating thing is the time, money (gold) and effort we as players invest in preparing for these events and the competition organizers don't even have the courtesy to give us adequate notification about the rescheduled dates/times on these events after these recurring schedule screw ups.
lord_farquad: Sorry for the issues caused this past weekend. As I mentioned in
the PM thread, I unfortunately had no internet while in Moscow for
Ural Steel, and was unaware that scheduling issues were occurring.
Subject: Arracourt Ante meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2670851
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 18:35, said: Well I've sacrificed the past 3 evenings of my personal life to
commit time during the usual scheduled times for the Skirmish XVI
championship round and that skirmish schedule hadn't been updated
and the battle didn't pop up for close to half a week now already.
Because of that scheduling mishap in addition to the post-meridian
mishap popping at the anti-meridian time the other day I assumed
since the Anti-Meridian tournament page didn't have a scheduled
day/time in place that it wasn't going to occur either without some
adequate notice. Someone must've updated the schedule 8 or less
hours prior to the actual battle time because when I had last
checked it there was nothing scheduled.
The result was 2 of our substitute players playing after purchasing alternative tanks at the last minute and not able to compete with what we had practiced and planned for. The frustrating thing is the time, money (gold) and effort we as players invest in preparing for these events and the competition organizers don't even have the courtesy to give us adequate notification about the rescheduled dates/times on these events after these recurring schedule screw ups.
Link on message: #2670851
dopper, on Sep 18 2012 - 18:35, said: Well I've sacrificed the past 3 evenings of my personal life to
commit time during the usual scheduled times for the Skirmish XVI
championship round and that skirmish schedule hadn't been updated
and the battle didn't pop up for close to half a week now already.
Because of that scheduling mishap in addition to the post-meridian
mishap popping at the anti-meridian time the other day I assumed
since the Anti-Meridian tournament page didn't have a scheduled
day/time in place that it wasn't going to occur either without some
adequate notice. Someone must've updated the schedule 8 or less
hours prior to the actual battle time because when I had last
checked it there was nothing scheduled.The result was 2 of our substitute players playing after purchasing alternative tanks at the last minute and not able to compete with what we had practiced and planned for. The frustrating thing is the time, money (gold) and effort we as players invest in preparing for these events and the competition organizers don't even have the courtesy to give us adequate notification about the rescheduled dates/times on these events after these recurring schedule screw ups.
lord_farquad: Sorry for the issues caused this past weekend. As I mentioned in
the PM thread, I unfortunately had no internet while in Moscow for
Ural Steel, and was unaware that scheduling issues were occurring.
Subject: All Star #54 Winners
Link on message: #2670830
SaVaGee, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:36, said: Thanks WG , That first place MVP score is huge , what
tank did Veracks use?
Link on message: #2670830
SaVaGee, on Sep 18 2012 - 19:36, said: Thanks WG , That first place MVP score is huge , what
tank did Veracks use?Agrona: SaVaGee, you seem to be a winner in almost every contest. Congrats!
HA. And Veracks was using the KV-5
Subject: Arracourt Post meridiem Challenge
Link on message: #2670801
Link on message: #2670801
lord_farquad: Also, as always, the battles that count were those fought at the
scheduled time on the 14th.
Реклама | Adv















