Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 12:43:12
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3348962
Revanant, on Dec 28 2012 - 11:33, said: Hey sorry if I'm wrong but didn't you change the MM to accomidate
t10 mediums and TD's? How was that significantly different from
making t10 arty? I'm honoestly just curious, as I've seen some of
these problems before and realize something added could have easily
confused the process.
Link on message: #3348962
Revanant, on Dec 28 2012 - 11:33, said: Hey sorry if I'm wrong but didn't you change the MM to accomidate
t10 mediums and TD's? How was that significantly different from
making t10 arty? I'm honoestly just curious, as I've seen some of
these problems before and realize something added could have easily
confused the process.GeneralDirection:
We didn't change the core matchmaker functionality, we just added tier 10 to medium and TD branches--much the same as we plan to do for SPGs. But until we make that change, this is the only workable solution. Because SPGs cap at tier 8, there's a lot of code at play specifically related to SPGs that would break matchmaking if we altered it too significantly.
The obvious solution is to introduce tier 9 and 10 SPGs, but unfortunately they aren't ready yet.
We didn't change the core matchmaker functionality, we just added tier 10 to medium and TD branches--much the same as we plan to do for SPGs. But until we make that change, this is the only workable solution. Because SPGs cap at tier 8, there's a lot of code at play specifically related to SPGs that would break matchmaking if we altered it too significantly.
The obvious solution is to introduce tier 9 and 10 SPGs, but unfortunately they aren't ready yet.
GeneralDirection
why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
28.12.2012 12:38:42
Subject: why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
Link on message: #3348951
TimedParadox, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:59, said: Alright.
5 as a cap is silly.
The second 5 arties appear on my match list, I stick to the less flankable piece of non-destructible cover I can find and put up youtube on my other screen, then hope I can go out fighting free of arty or my team wins.
What is my alternative? Stick my head out and pay a repair bill while having absolutely no fun.
Arty in its current state isn't fun to play against, anyone who thinks otherwise is a masochist or biting their lip just to be contrary.
Link on message: #3348951
TimedParadox, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:59, said: Alright.5 as a cap is silly.
The second 5 arties appear on my match list, I stick to the less flankable piece of non-destructible cover I can find and put up youtube on my other screen, then hope I can go out fighting free of arty or my team wins.
What is my alternative? Stick my head out and pay a repair bill while having absolutely no fun.
Arty in its current state isn't fun to play against, anyone who thinks otherwise is a masochist or biting their lip just to be contrary.
GeneralDirection: Give it a try, that's all we ask. If it sucks, tell us and we'll
listen. We can't promise immediate change, but hopefully the last
year has proven we're willing to alter mechanics if we feel it
benefits our players.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 12:34:10
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348943
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:50, said: Well, I've been playing video games a long long time and when the
concept of MMO was first raised one of the first things alot of
designers discussed was the "what if" factor....What if we do XYZ,
what will happen? The general conclusion was that people
will ALWAYS do something completely stupid in a punishment-free
environment.
Now, with the sherrif events team killing if the sherrif is on your side is punished, ergo I've not seen anybody do it. I know that is HAS but its a good discouraging factor.
i think what I'm getting at is that the gripes and complaints voiced here are what we like to call the "vocal minority". You hear about how bad the events are and how they ruin the game and blah blah blah, but the truth is there are a relatively small percentage of people acting the fool when the complaints are formed. You have just as much a chance of entering a match with some idiot that wants to drown himself, or roadblock his team, or team kill or act like a jackass in chat as you do someone dropping everything and trying to score an in-game reward.
I want to see mroe events, events are fricken FUN! Anybody remember the "blood plague" in World of Warcraft? Holy hell, it was hilarious! There were panic in teh streets, bodies everywhere, some jerks were running around spreading it, some were working ot heal those affected, some stayed away from hot zones while others just didnt play for a while.
Events are interesting social experiments, dont just stop doing them because you're afraid of humans acting like retarded monkeys....we ARE retarded monkeys.
Pope_Shizzle, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:52, said: GD, please ignore the voices of the few people who whine about
Sheriff events and listen to the voices of the silent majority who
enjoy them. I ran sheriff accounts the last couple times
they have been active and I had an absolute blast. 95%
of the feedback from the players in game was
positive. The opportunity to get gold for people who
otherwise wouldn't have it is awesome. Run the
numbers. How many battles did the sheriffs run during
the last 3 events? How many total battles were played by
the general player base? Does it really matter that a
few games were played differently? Please ignore the
forum trolls.
Link on message: #3348943
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:50, said: Well, I've been playing video games a long long time and when the
concept of MMO was first raised one of the first things alot of
designers discussed was the "what if" factor....What if we do XYZ,
what will happen? The general conclusion was that people
will ALWAYS do something completely stupid in a punishment-free
environment.Now, with the sherrif events team killing if the sherrif is on your side is punished, ergo I've not seen anybody do it. I know that is HAS but its a good discouraging factor.
i think what I'm getting at is that the gripes and complaints voiced here are what we like to call the "vocal minority". You hear about how bad the events are and how they ruin the game and blah blah blah, but the truth is there are a relatively small percentage of people acting the fool when the complaints are formed. You have just as much a chance of entering a match with some idiot that wants to drown himself, or roadblock his team, or team kill or act like a jackass in chat as you do someone dropping everything and trying to score an in-game reward.
I want to see mroe events, events are fricken FUN! Anybody remember the "blood plague" in World of Warcraft? Holy hell, it was hilarious! There were panic in teh streets, bodies everywhere, some jerks were running around spreading it, some were working ot heal those affected, some stayed away from hot zones while others just didnt play for a while.
Events are interesting social experiments, dont just stop doing them because you're afraid of humans acting like retarded monkeys....we ARE retarded monkeys.
GeneralDirection: Don't worry, I'm not looking to get rid of the sheriff events. Part
of our philosophy is to design events like this. We have to make
money as a business, but we're also going to stick to our guns that
the game is free to play, and that means giving away gold as a
reward for events. 500 gold as it was before this particular
sheriff event is insignificant in the grand scheme of things.
Like I mentioned in a recent thread about removing the countdown--not everyone can afford to upgrade their computer at the drop of a hat, and not everyone can afford to pull out their wallet every time a purchase in-game is involved. We realize that, and we respect it.
At the end of the day, even if you can't spend the most money on your block, you're still contributing to the game. This is a player versus player game after all, so everyone counts. Without the player base as a whole, there are a lot less tanks driving around, which results in potentially longer queues and a weaker experience once you're in a battle.
So we're going to continue designing these kinds of events, because it gives someone an opportunity to pick up a garage slot, or some free experience, or to retrain a crew. You might even be able to pick up some premium time, purchase some camouflage or top off the gold needed to buy a premium vehicle. We're fine with that.
Like I mentioned in a recent thread about removing the countdown--not everyone can afford to upgrade their computer at the drop of a hat, and not everyone can afford to pull out their wallet every time a purchase in-game is involved. We realize that, and we respect it.
At the end of the day, even if you can't spend the most money on your block, you're still contributing to the game. This is a player versus player game after all, so everyone counts. Without the player base as a whole, there are a lot less tanks driving around, which results in potentially longer queues and a weaker experience once you're in a battle.
So we're going to continue designing these kinds of events, because it gives someone an opportunity to pick up a garage slot, or some free experience, or to retrain a crew. You might even be able to pick up some premium time, purchase some camouflage or top off the gold needed to buy a premium vehicle. We're fine with that.
Pope_Shizzle, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:52, said: GD, please ignore the voices of the few people who whine about
Sheriff events and listen to the voices of the silent majority who
enjoy them. I ran sheriff accounts the last couple times
they have been active and I had an absolute blast. 95%
of the feedback from the players in game was
positive. The opportunity to get gold for people who
otherwise wouldn't have it is awesome. Run the
numbers. How many battles did the sheriffs run during
the last 3 events? How many total battles were played by
the general player base? Does it really matter that a
few games were played differently? Please ignore the
forum trolls.GeneralDirection:
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 12:34:10
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348943
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:50, said: Well, I've been playing video games a long long time and when the
concept of MMO was first raised one of the first things alot of
designers discussed was the "what if" factor....What if we do XYZ,
what will happen? The general conclusion was that people
will ALWAYS do something completely stupid in a punishment-free
environment.
Now, with the sherrif events team killing if the sherrif is on your side is punished, ergo I've not seen anybody do it. I know that is HAS but its a good discouraging factor.
i think what I'm getting at is that the gripes and complaints voiced here are what we like to call the "vocal minority". You hear about how bad the events are and how they ruin the game and blah blah blah, but the truth is there are a relatively small percentage of people acting the fool when the complaints are formed. You have just as much a chance of entering a match with some idiot that wants to drown himself, or roadblock his team, or team kill or act like a jackass in chat as you do someone dropping everything and trying to score an in-game reward.
I want to see mroe events, events are fricken FUN! Anybody remember the "blood plague" in World of Warcraft? Holy hell, it was hilarious! There were panic in teh streets, bodies everywhere, some jerks were running around spreading it, some were working ot heal those affected, some stayed away from hot zones while others just didnt play for a while.
Events are interesting social experiments, dont just stop doing them because you're afraid of humans acting like retarded monkeys....we ARE retarded monkeys.
Pope_Shizzle, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:52, said: GD, please ignore the voices of the few people who whine about
Sheriff events and listen to the voices of the silent majority who
enjoy them. I ran sheriff accounts the last couple times
they have been active and I had an absolute blast. 95%
of the feedback from the players in game was
positive. The opportunity to get gold for people who
otherwise wouldn't have it is awesome. Run the
numbers. How many battles did the sheriffs run during
the last 3 events? How many total battles were played by
the general player base? Does it really matter that a
few games were played differently? Please ignore the
forum trolls.
Link on message: #3348943
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:50, said: Well, I've been playing video games a long long time and when the
concept of MMO was first raised one of the first things alot of
designers discussed was the "what if" factor....What if we do XYZ,
what will happen? The general conclusion was that people
will ALWAYS do something completely stupid in a punishment-free
environment.Now, with the sherrif events team killing if the sherrif is on your side is punished, ergo I've not seen anybody do it. I know that is HAS but its a good discouraging factor.
i think what I'm getting at is that the gripes and complaints voiced here are what we like to call the "vocal minority". You hear about how bad the events are and how they ruin the game and blah blah blah, but the truth is there are a relatively small percentage of people acting the fool when the complaints are formed. You have just as much a chance of entering a match with some idiot that wants to drown himself, or roadblock his team, or team kill or act like a jackass in chat as you do someone dropping everything and trying to score an in-game reward.
I want to see mroe events, events are fricken FUN! Anybody remember the "blood plague" in World of Warcraft? Holy hell, it was hilarious! There were panic in teh streets, bodies everywhere, some jerks were running around spreading it, some were working ot heal those affected, some stayed away from hot zones while others just didnt play for a while.
Events are interesting social experiments, dont just stop doing them because you're afraid of humans acting like retarded monkeys....we ARE retarded monkeys.
GeneralDirection: Don't worry, I'm not looking to get rid of the sheriff events. Part
of our philosophy is to design events like this. We have to make
money as a business, but we're also going to stick to our guns that
the game is free to play, and that means giving away gold as a
reward for events. 500 gold as it was before this particular
sheriff event is insignificant in the grand scheme of things.
Like I mentioned in a recent thread about removing the countdown--not everyone can afford to upgrade their computer at the drop of a hat, and not everyone can afford to pull out their wallet every time a purchase in-game is involved. We realize that, and we respect it.
At the end of the day, even if you can't spend the most money on your block, you're still contributing to the game. This is a player versus player game after all, so everyone counts. Without the player base as a whole, there are a lot less tanks driving around, which results in potentially longer queues and a weaker experience once you're in a battle.
So we're going to continue designing these kinds of events, because it gives someone an opportunity to pick up a garage slot, or some free experience, or to retrain a crew. You might even be able to pick up some premium time, purchase some camouflage or top off the gold needed to buy a premium vehicle. We're fine with that.
Like I mentioned in a recent thread about removing the countdown--not everyone can afford to upgrade their computer at the drop of a hat, and not everyone can afford to pull out their wallet every time a purchase in-game is involved. We realize that, and we respect it.
At the end of the day, even if you can't spend the most money on your block, you're still contributing to the game. This is a player versus player game after all, so everyone counts. Without the player base as a whole, there are a lot less tanks driving around, which results in potentially longer queues and a weaker experience once you're in a battle.
So we're going to continue designing these kinds of events, because it gives someone an opportunity to pick up a garage slot, or some free experience, or to retrain a crew. You might even be able to pick up some premium time, purchase some camouflage or top off the gold needed to buy a premium vehicle. We're fine with that.
Pope_Shizzle, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:52, said: GD, please ignore the voices of the few people who whine about
Sheriff events and listen to the voices of the silent majority who
enjoy them. I ran sheriff accounts the last couple times
they have been active and I had an absolute blast. 95%
of the feedback from the players in game was
positive. The opportunity to get gold for people who
otherwise wouldn't have it is awesome. Run the
numbers. How many battles did the sheriffs run during
the last 3 events? How many total battles were played by
the general player base? Does it really matter that a
few games were played differently? Please ignore the
forum trolls.GeneralDirection:
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 12:34:10
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348943
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:50, said: Well, I've been playing video games a long long time and when the
concept of MMO was first raised one of the first things alot of
designers discussed was the "what if" factor....What if we do XYZ,
what will happen? The general conclusion was that people
will ALWAYS do something completely stupid in a punishment-free
environment.
Now, with the sherrif events team killing if the sherrif is on your side is punished, ergo I've not seen anybody do it. I know that is HAS but its a good discouraging factor.
i think what I'm getting at is that the gripes and complaints voiced here are what we like to call the "vocal minority". You hear about how bad the events are and how they ruin the game and blah blah blah, but the truth is there are a relatively small percentage of people acting the fool when the complaints are formed. You have just as much a chance of entering a match with some idiot that wants to drown himself, or roadblock his team, or team kill or act like a jackass in chat as you do someone dropping everything and trying to score an in-game reward.
I want to see mroe events, events are fricken FUN! Anybody remember the "blood plague" in World of Warcraft? Holy hell, it was hilarious! There were panic in teh streets, bodies everywhere, some jerks were running around spreading it, some were working ot heal those affected, some stayed away from hot zones while others just didnt play for a while.
Events are interesting social experiments, dont just stop doing them because you're afraid of humans acting like retarded monkeys....we ARE retarded monkeys.
Pope_Shizzle, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:52, said: GD, please ignore the voices of the few people who whine about
Sheriff events and listen to the voices of the silent majority who
enjoy them. I ran sheriff accounts the last couple times
they have been active and I had an absolute blast. 95%
of the feedback from the players in game was
positive. The opportunity to get gold for people who
otherwise wouldn't have it is awesome. Run the
numbers. How many battles did the sheriffs run during
the last 3 events? How many total battles were played by
the general player base? Does it really matter that a
few games were played differently? Please ignore the
forum trolls.
Link on message: #3348943
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:50, said: Well, I've been playing video games a long long time and when the
concept of MMO was first raised one of the first things alot of
designers discussed was the "what if" factor....What if we do XYZ,
what will happen? The general conclusion was that people
will ALWAYS do something completely stupid in a punishment-free
environment.Now, with the sherrif events team killing if the sherrif is on your side is punished, ergo I've not seen anybody do it. I know that is HAS but its a good discouraging factor.
i think what I'm getting at is that the gripes and complaints voiced here are what we like to call the "vocal minority". You hear about how bad the events are and how they ruin the game and blah blah blah, but the truth is there are a relatively small percentage of people acting the fool when the complaints are formed. You have just as much a chance of entering a match with some idiot that wants to drown himself, or roadblock his team, or team kill or act like a jackass in chat as you do someone dropping everything and trying to score an in-game reward.
I want to see mroe events, events are fricken FUN! Anybody remember the "blood plague" in World of Warcraft? Holy hell, it was hilarious! There were panic in teh streets, bodies everywhere, some jerks were running around spreading it, some were working ot heal those affected, some stayed away from hot zones while others just didnt play for a while.
Events are interesting social experiments, dont just stop doing them because you're afraid of humans acting like retarded monkeys....we ARE retarded monkeys.
GeneralDirection: Don't worry, I'm not looking to get rid of the sheriff events. Part
of our philosophy is to design events like this. We have to make
money as a business, but we're also going to stick to our guns that
the game is free to play, and that means giving away gold as a
reward for events. 500 gold as it was before this particular
sheriff event is insignificant in the grand scheme of things.
Like I mentioned in a recent thread about removing the countdown--not everyone can afford to upgrade their computer at the drop of a hat, and not everyone can afford to pull out their wallet every time a purchase in-game is involved. We realize that, and we respect it.
At the end of the day, even if you can't spend the most money on your block, you're still contributing to the game. This is a player versus player game after all, so everyone counts. Without the player base as a whole, there are a lot less tanks driving around, which results in potentially longer queues and a weaker experience once you're in a battle.
So we're going to continue designing these kinds of events, because it gives someone an opportunity to pick up a garage slot, or some free experience, or to retrain a crew. You might even be able to pick up some premium time, purchase some camouflage or top off the gold needed to buy a premium vehicle. We're fine with that.
Like I mentioned in a recent thread about removing the countdown--not everyone can afford to upgrade their computer at the drop of a hat, and not everyone can afford to pull out their wallet every time a purchase in-game is involved. We realize that, and we respect it.
At the end of the day, even if you can't spend the most money on your block, you're still contributing to the game. This is a player versus player game after all, so everyone counts. Without the player base as a whole, there are a lot less tanks driving around, which results in potentially longer queues and a weaker experience once you're in a battle.
So we're going to continue designing these kinds of events, because it gives someone an opportunity to pick up a garage slot, or some free experience, or to retrain a crew. You might even be able to pick up some premium time, purchase some camouflage or top off the gold needed to buy a premium vehicle. We're fine with that.
Pope_Shizzle, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:52, said: GD, please ignore the voices of the few people who whine about
Sheriff events and listen to the voices of the silent majority who
enjoy them. I ran sheriff accounts the last couple times
they have been active and I had an absolute blast. 95%
of the feedback from the players in game was
positive. The opportunity to get gold for people who
otherwise wouldn't have it is awesome. Run the
numbers. How many battles did the sheriffs run during
the last 3 events? How many total battles were played by
the general player base? Does it really matter that a
few games were played differently? Please ignore the
forum trolls.GeneralDirection:
GeneralDirection
Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
28.12.2012 11:51:09
Subject: Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
Link on message: #3348838
jdeltaarrow, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:30, said: Do all the games have to be played on one tank or a total of 5 game
played on a tier 10...i play my t110e5 and M48a1 once in a while
and don't know if I've hit 5 on just one of them.
Link on message: #3348838
jdeltaarrow, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:30, said: Do all the games have to be played on one tank or a total of 5 game
played on a tier 10...i play my t110e5 and M48a1 once in a while
and don't know if I've hit 5 on just one of them.GeneralDirection: It's just a total of 5 on your account. It doesn't need to be on
tier 10s. You just need to own one.
GeneralDirection
Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
28.12.2012 11:51:09
Subject: Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
Link on message: #3348838
jdeltaarrow, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:30, said: Do all the games have to be played on one tank or a total of 5 game
played on a tier 10...i play my t110e5 and M48a1 once in a while
and don't know if I've hit 5 on just one of them.
Link on message: #3348838
jdeltaarrow, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:30, said: Do all the games have to be played on one tank or a total of 5 game
played on a tier 10...i play my t110e5 and M48a1 once in a while
and don't know if I've hit 5 on just one of them.GeneralDirection:
It's just a total of 5 on your account. It doesn't need to be on tier 10s. You just need to own one.
It's just a total of 5 on your account. It doesn't need to be on tier 10s. You just need to own one.
GeneralDirection
Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
28.12.2012 11:51:09
Subject: Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
Link on message: #3348838
jdeltaarrow, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:30, said: Do all the games have to be played on one tank or a total of 5 game
played on a tier 10...i play my t110e5 and M48a1 once in a while
and don't know if I've hit 5 on just one of them.
Link on message: #3348838
jdeltaarrow, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:30, said: Do all the games have to be played on one tank or a total of 5 game
played on a tier 10...i play my t110e5 and M48a1 once in a while
and don't know if I've hit 5 on just one of them.GeneralDirection:
It's just a total of 5 on your account. It doesn't need to be on tier 10s. You just need to own one.
It's just a total of 5 on your account. It doesn't need to be on tier 10s. You just need to own one.
GeneralDirection
why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
28.12.2012 11:11:12
Subject: why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
Link on message: #3348743
Revanant, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:08, said: You just need to say that first. All i want is games
where leaving cover isnt instant death, and strat involving being
out in the open aren't laughed at the same way russian ruellete
is. Also 5 cap isnt a cap.
Link on message: #3348743
Revanant, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:08, said: You just need to say that first. All i want is games
where leaving cover isnt instant death, and strat involving being
out in the open aren't laughed at the same way russian ruellete
is. Also 5 cap isnt a cap.GeneralDirection: Well, when looking at what can happen right now, I think 5
qualifies as a cap. Maybe not for low and middle tier battles, but
definitely for higher tiers.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 11:08:42
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348733
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:02, said: Just for grins and ha ha's I'd love to see a giagantic, raid type tank EVERYBODY had to shoot to kill. Think about it, an M3 the size of a school gym that could crush you, forcing you to team up with the other side to survive. A real "encounter" battle
Link on message: #3348733
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:02, said: Just for grins and ha ha's I'd love to see a giagantic, raid type tank EVERYBODY had to shoot to kill. Think about it, an M3 the size of a school gym that could crush you, forcing you to team up with the other side to survive. A real "encounter" battle
GeneralDirection: It's on the drawing board... 
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 11:08:42
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348733
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:02, said: Just for grins and ha ha's I'd love to see a giagantic, raid type
tank EVERYBODY had to shoot to kill. Think about it, an
M3 the size of a school gym that could crush you, forcing you to
team up with the other side to survive. A real
"encounter" battle 
Link on message: #3348733
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:02, said: Just for grins and ha ha's I'd love to see a giagantic, raid type
tank EVERYBODY had to shoot to kill. Think about it, an
M3 the size of a school gym that could crush you, forcing you to
team up with the other side to survive. A real
"encounter" battle GeneralDirection: It's on the drawing board... 
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 11:08:42
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348733
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:02, said: Just for grins and ha ha's I'd love to see a giagantic, raid type
tank EVERYBODY had to shoot to kill. Think about it, an
M3 the size of a school gym that could crush you, forcing you to
team up with the other side to survive. A real
"encounter" battle
Link on message: #3348733
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 10:02, said: Just for grins and ha ha's I'd love to see a giagantic, raid type
tank EVERYBODY had to shoot to kill. Think about it, an
M3 the size of a school gym that could crush you, forcing you to
team up with the other side to survive. A real
"encounter" battle GeneralDirection: It's on the drawing board...
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 11:07:07
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3348726
UncleDolfy, on Dec 28 2012 - 04:16, said: False dichotomy of "either we do A or we can only do B". I don't
believe that is the case, even reading how the MM algorithm works
in the wiki. That is, if you can program it to drop the cap to 5,
you can program it to drop to 3 or whatever number.
It just means if there's a lot of arties player they will just have to wait a lot longer, some may just have to wait longer. But if that were the rule, and that is clearly stated, that's not MM's problem.
Link on message: #3348726
UncleDolfy, on Dec 28 2012 - 04:16, said: False dichotomy of "either we do A or we can only do B". I don't
believe that is the case, even reading how the MM algorithm works
in the wiki. That is, if you can program it to drop the cap to 5,
you can program it to drop to 3 or whatever number.It just means if there's a lot of arties player they will just have to wait a lot longer, some may just have to wait longer. But if that were the rule, and that is clearly stated, that's not MM's problem.
GeneralDirection: It isn't a situation of A or B. It's a situation of "What can we do
before completely breaking the matchmaker because of the way it
currently works?"
This will not be the last change if we need to make more. But rewriting the matchmaker when we plan to change SPGs to have the same tier range as heavies, mediums and TDs would be a pretty significant waste of development time.
This will not be the last change if we need to make more. But rewriting the matchmaker when we plan to change SPGs to have the same tier range as heavies, mediums and TDs would be a pretty significant waste of development time.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 11:07:07
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3348726
UncleDolfy, on Dec 28 2012 - 04:16, said:
False dichotomy of "either we do A or we can only do B". I don't believe that is the case, even reading how the MM algorithm works in the wiki. That is, if you can program it to drop the cap to 5, you can program it to drop to 3 or whatever number.
It just means if there's a lot of arties player they will just have to wait a lot longer, some may just have to wait longer. But if that were the rule, and that is clearly stated, that's not MM's problem.
Link on message: #3348726
UncleDolfy, on Dec 28 2012 - 04:16, said: False dichotomy of "either we do A or we can only do B". I don't believe that is the case, even reading how the MM algorithm works in the wiki. That is, if you can program it to drop the cap to 5, you can program it to drop to 3 or whatever number.
It just means if there's a lot of arties player they will just have to wait a lot longer, some may just have to wait longer. But if that were the rule, and that is clearly stated, that's not MM's problem.
GeneralDirection:
It isn't a situation of A or B. It's a situation of "What can we do before completely breaking the matchmaker because of the way it currently works?"
This will not be the last change if we need to make more. But rewriting the matchmaker when we plan to change SPGs to have the same tier range as heavies, mediums and TDs would be a pretty significant waste of development time.
It isn't a situation of A or B. It's a situation of "What can we do before completely breaking the matchmaker because of the way it currently works?"
This will not be the last change if we need to make more. But rewriting the matchmaker when we plan to change SPGs to have the same tier range as heavies, mediums and TDs would be a pretty significant waste of development time.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 11:07:07
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3348726
UncleDolfy, on Dec 28 2012 - 04:16, said:
False dichotomy of "either we do A or we can only do B". I don't believe that is the case, even reading how the MM algorithm works in the wiki. That is, if you can program it to drop the cap to 5, you can program it to drop to 3 or whatever number.
It just means if there's a lot of arties player they will just have to wait a lot longer, some may just have to wait longer. But if that were the rule, and that is clearly stated, that's not MM's problem.
Link on message: #3348726
UncleDolfy, on Dec 28 2012 - 04:16, said: False dichotomy of "either we do A or we can only do B". I don't believe that is the case, even reading how the MM algorithm works in the wiki. That is, if you can program it to drop the cap to 5, you can program it to drop to 3 or whatever number.
It just means if there's a lot of arties player they will just have to wait a lot longer, some may just have to wait longer. But if that were the rule, and that is clearly stated, that's not MM's problem.
GeneralDirection:
It isn't a situation of A or B. It's a situation of "What can we do before completely breaking the matchmaker because of the way it currently works?"
This will not be the last change if we need to make more. But rewriting the matchmaker when we plan to change SPGs to have the same tier range as heavies, mediums and TDs would be a pretty significant waste of development time.
It isn't a situation of A or B. It's a situation of "What can we do before completely breaking the matchmaker because of the way it currently works?"
This will not be the last change if we need to make more. But rewriting the matchmaker when we plan to change SPGs to have the same tier range as heavies, mediums and TDs would be a pretty significant waste of development time.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:41:24
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348648
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:37, said: I think losing the announcement wouldnt do a whole lot...people are usually pretty good about screaming that the sherrif is in the match anyways.
Honestly keeping it exactly as it is now is fine. Its fun, a nice little reward, something to look forward to and there are going to be idiots on every team no matter what the conditions.
Link on message: #3348648
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:37, said: I think losing the announcement wouldnt do a whole lot...people are usually pretty good about screaming that the sherrif is in the match anyways.
Honestly keeping it exactly as it is now is fine. Its fun, a nice little reward, something to look forward to and there are going to be idiots on every team no matter what the conditions.
GeneralDirection: The problem is that it seems--at least from feedback--that this
completely changes the reason a person plays a battle. This is not
good.
To give an example that I mentioned in my AMA, we came up with the idea of a Lumberjack epic achivement--rewarded for knocking down trees. At the time knocking down a tree was of no benefit, so the idea was shot down because it would encourage play that is against the spirit of the game.
We might have to review this event for that reason as well. We'll keep a close eye on data from the January event.
To give an example that I mentioned in my AMA, we came up with the idea of a Lumberjack epic achivement--rewarded for knocking down trees. At the time knocking down a tree was of no benefit, so the idea was shot down because it would encourage play that is against the spirit of the game.
We might have to review this event for that reason as well. We'll keep a close eye on data from the January event.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:41:24
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348648
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:37, said: I think losing the announcement wouldnt do a whole lot...people are
usually pretty good about screaming that the sherrif is in the
match anyways.
Honestly keeping it exactly as it is now is fine. Its fun, a nice little reward, something to look forward to and there are going to be idiots on every team no matter what the conditions.
Link on message: #3348648
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:37, said: I think losing the announcement wouldnt do a whole lot...people are
usually pretty good about screaming that the sherrif is in the
match anyways.Honestly keeping it exactly as it is now is fine. Its fun, a nice little reward, something to look forward to and there are going to be idiots on every team no matter what the conditions.
GeneralDirection: The problem is that it seems--at least from feedback--that this
completely changes the reason a person plays a battle. This is not
good.
To give an example that I mentioned in my AMA, we came up with the idea of a Lumberjack epic achivement--rewarded for knocking down trees. At the time knocking down a tree was of no benefit, so the idea was shot down because it would encourage play that is against the spirit of the game.
We might have to review this event for that reason as well. We'll keep a close eye on data from the January event.
To give an example that I mentioned in my AMA, we came up with the idea of a Lumberjack epic achivement--rewarded for knocking down trees. At the time knocking down a tree was of no benefit, so the idea was shot down because it would encourage play that is against the spirit of the game.
We might have to review this event for that reason as well. We'll keep a close eye on data from the January event.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:41:24
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348648
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:37, said: I think losing the announcement wouldnt do a whole lot...people are
usually pretty good about screaming that the sherrif is in the
match anyways.
Honestly keeping it exactly as it is now is fine. Its fun, a nice little reward, something to look forward to and there are going to be idiots on every team no matter what the conditions.
Link on message: #3348648
Comorat, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:37, said: I think losing the announcement wouldnt do a whole lot...people are
usually pretty good about screaming that the sherrif is in the
match anyways.Honestly keeping it exactly as it is now is fine. Its fun, a nice little reward, something to look forward to and there are going to be idiots on every team no matter what the conditions.
GeneralDirection: The problem is that it seems--at least from feedback--that this
completely changes the reason a person plays a battle. This is not
good.
To give an example that I mentioned in my AMA, we came up with the idea of a Lumberjack epic achivement--rewarded for knocking down trees. At the time knocking down a tree was of no benefit, so the idea was shot down because it would encourage play that is against the spirit of the game.
We might have to review this event for that reason as well. We'll keep a close eye on data from the January event.
To give an example that I mentioned in my AMA, we came up with the idea of a Lumberjack epic achivement--rewarded for knocking down trees. At the time knocking down a tree was of no benefit, so the idea was shot down because it would encourage play that is against the spirit of the game.
We might have to review this event for that reason as well. We'll keep a close eye on data from the January event.
GeneralDirection
why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
28.12.2012 10:36:51
Subject: why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
Link on message: #3348630
Frozenpants, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:35, said: But surely that is the problem? There is only one strategy .. camp
in a place safe from Arty.. or push up and die. Games with heavy
arty are not fun and are pretty much decided by which team gets
bored first, decides to just go for it and just hope for the best.
Link on message: #3348630
Frozenpants, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:35, said: But surely that is the problem? There is only one strategy .. camp
in a place safe from Arty.. or push up and die. Games with heavy
arty are not fun and are pretty much decided by which team gets
bored first, decides to just go for it and just hope for the best.GeneralDirection: Which is exactly why we're limiting them and planning additional
changes down the road.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:34:53
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348620
Zeppelinisgod, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:33, said: What are we talking about here?
Link on message: #3348620
Zeppelinisgod, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:33, said: What are we talking about here?
GeneralDirection: The sheriff currently announces their existence in the battle chat
during the countdown.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:34:53
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348620
Zeppelinisgod, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:33, said: What are we talking about here?
Link on message: #3348620
Zeppelinisgod, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:33, said: What are we talking about here?GeneralDirection: The sheriff currently announces their existence in the battle chat
during the countdown.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:34:53
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348620
Zeppelinisgod, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:33, said: What are we talking about here?
Link on message: #3348620
Zeppelinisgod, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:33, said: What are we talking about here?GeneralDirection: The sheriff currently announces their existence in the battle chat
during the countdown.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:32:01
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348611
Link on message: #3348611
GeneralDirection: What do you guys think of us getting rid of the chat announcement?
Good idea? Bad idea? Burn it in the fire place before anyone can
see it?
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:32:01
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348611
Link on message: #3348611
GeneralDirection: What do you guys think of us getting rid of the chat announcement?
Good idea? Bad idea? Burn it in the fire place before anyone can
see it?
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:32:01
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348611
Link on message: #3348611
GeneralDirection: What do you guys think of us getting rid of the chat announcement?
Good idea? Bad idea? Burn it in the fire place before anyone can
see it?
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:27:28
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348595
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:25, said: I wonder what the look of sheer horror would be if someone realized I have used a Sheriff account in the past.
Link on message: #3348595
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:25, said: I wonder what the look of sheer horror would be if someone realized I have used a Sheriff account in the past.
GeneralDirection: Go check out the New Year's Bash thread. That guy in the image is
me right now.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:27:28
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348595
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:25, said: I wonder what the look of sheer horror would be if someone realized
I have used a Sheriff account in the past.
Link on message: #3348595
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:25, said: I wonder what the look of sheer horror would be if someone realized
I have used a Sheriff account in the past.GeneralDirection: Go check out the New Year's Bash thread. That guy in the image is
me right now.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:27:28
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348595
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:25, said: I wonder what the look of sheer horror would be if someone realized
I have used a Sheriff account in the past.
Link on message: #3348595
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:25, said: I wonder what the look of sheer horror would be if someone realized
I have used a Sheriff account in the past.GeneralDirection: Go check out the New Year's Bash thread. That guy in the image is
me right now.
GeneralDirection
why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
28.12.2012 10:24:26
Subject: why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
Link on message: #3348587
TimedParadox, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:08, said: How does one form a strategy around being one shot or severely
crippled from anywhere on the map, at any time, without you ever
seeing it coming or being able to retaliate from it?
Dying to hear this one, specially from a dev.
Link on message: #3348587
TimedParadox, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:08, said: How does one form a strategy around being one shot or severely
crippled from anywhere on the map, at any time, without you ever
seeing it coming or being able to retaliate from it?Dying to hear this one, specially from a dev.
GeneralDirection: Well, on some maps it's not as easy. I actually played a battle
today on Prokhorovka with 8 on the enemy team, 6 on ours. Given the
map, that was not a fun experience.
So really, you decide whether or not you hug areas that can block SPG shots. It's pretty cut and dry, but I actually like having to think about the IS-7's buddy off in the corner. As long as there aren't 8 of them.
So really, you decide whether or not you hug areas that can block SPG shots. It's pretty cut and dry, but I actually like having to think about the IS-7's buddy off in the corner. As long as there aren't 8 of them.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:20:19
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348577
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:11, said: Sorry I don't remember. I'll pay more attention next time. I wasn't sure if a few unpleasant words would really mean a lot to the WG staff. Maybe my friends have some screenshots, I was platooning at the time. I'll contact them and ask about it tomorrow.
Link on message: #3348577
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:11, said: Sorry I don't remember. I'll pay more attention next time. I wasn't sure if a few unpleasant words would really mean a lot to the WG staff. Maybe my friends have some screenshots, I was platooning at the time. I'll contact them and ask about it tomorrow.
GeneralDirection: These accounts are essentially representing Wargaming during the
event, so we take the behavior very seriously.
If you find out you have more info on this incident, feel free to send me a PM.
If you find out you have more info on this incident, feel free to send me a PM.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:20:19
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348577
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:11, said: Sorry I don't remember. I'll pay more attention next time. I wasn't
sure if a few unpleasant words would really mean a lot to the WG
staff. Maybe my friends have some screenshots, I was platooning at
the time. I'll contact them and ask about it tomorrow.
Link on message: #3348577
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:11, said: Sorry I don't remember. I'll pay more attention next time. I wasn't
sure if a few unpleasant words would really mean a lot to the WG
staff. Maybe my friends have some screenshots, I was platooning at
the time. I'll contact them and ask about it tomorrow.GeneralDirection: These accounts are essentially representing Wargaming during the
event, so we take the behavior very seriously.
If you find out you have more info on this incident, feel free to send me a PM.
If you find out you have more info on this incident, feel free to send me a PM.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:20:19
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348577
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:11, said: Sorry I don't remember. I'll pay more attention next time. I wasn't
sure if a few unpleasant words would really mean a lot to the WG
staff. Maybe my friends have some screenshots, I was platooning at
the time. I'll contact them and ask about it tomorrow.
Link on message: #3348577
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:11, said: Sorry I don't remember. I'll pay more attention next time. I wasn't
sure if a few unpleasant words would really mean a lot to the WG
staff. Maybe my friends have some screenshots, I was platooning at
the time. I'll contact them and ask about it tomorrow.GeneralDirection: These accounts are essentially representing Wargaming during the
event, so we take the behavior very seriously.
If you find out you have more info on this incident, feel free to send me a PM.
If you find out you have more info on this incident, feel free to send me a PM.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:07:21
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348554
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:03, said: So if a sheriff was cussing at my team I should have screenshotted it and reported it? oops.
Edit: I recalled it wrong, he wasn't cussing at my team but he was still being err.. unpleasant to say the least.
Link on message: #3348554
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:03, said: So if a sheriff was cussing at my team I should have screenshotted it and reported it? oops.
Edit: I recalled it wrong, he wasn't cussing at my team but he was still being err.. unpleasant to say the least.
GeneralDirection: If you remember the sheriff name we can pull up chat logs.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:07:21
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348554
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:03, said: So if a sheriff was cussing at my team I should have screenshotted
it and reported it? oops.
Edit: I recalled it wrong, he wasn't cussing at my team but he was still being err.. unpleasant to say the least.
Link on message: #3348554
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:03, said: So if a sheriff was cussing at my team I should have screenshotted
it and reported it? oops.Edit: I recalled it wrong, he wasn't cussing at my team but he was still being err.. unpleasant to say the least.
GeneralDirection: If you remember the sheriff name we can pull up chat logs.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 10:07:21
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348554
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:03, said: So if a sheriff was cussing at my team I should have screenshotted
it and reported it? oops.
Edit: I recalled it wrong, he wasn't cussing at my team but he was still being err.. unpleasant to say the least.
Link on message: #3348554
Mattdude77, on Dec 28 2012 - 09:03, said: So if a sheriff was cussing at my team I should have screenshotted
it and reported it? oops.Edit: I recalled it wrong, he wasn't cussing at my team but he was still being err.. unpleasant to say the least.
GeneralDirection: If you remember the sheriff name we can pull up chat logs.
GeneralDirection
Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
28.12.2012 09:57:55
Subject: Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
Link on message: #3348517
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:54, said: Interesting, that's helpfull last one
Q: when will I get notification ? At end of due date or duration ?
Link on message: #3348517
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:54, said: Interesting, that's helpfull last oneQ: when will I get notification ? At end of due date or duration ?
GeneralDirection: After the end of the program. All you have to know is that if
you've played 5 battles between Dec. 20 and Jan. 10 and have a tier
10 in your garage, then you're eligible for the shirt.
GeneralDirection
Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
28.12.2012 09:57:55
Subject: Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
Link on message: #3348517
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:54, said: Interesting, that's helpfull last one
Q: when will I get notification ? At end of due date or duration ?
Link on message: #3348517
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:54, said: Interesting, that's helpfull last oneQ: when will I get notification ? At end of due date or duration ?
GeneralDirection: After the end of the program. All you have to know is that if
you've played 5 battles between Dec. 20 and Jan. 10 and have a tier
10 in your garage, then you're eligible for the shirt.
GeneralDirection
Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
28.12.2012 09:57:55
Subject: Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
Link on message: #3348517
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:54, said: Interesting, that's helpfull last one
Q: when will I get notification ? At end of due date or duration ?
Link on message: #3348517
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:54, said: Interesting, that's helpfull last oneQ: when will I get notification ? At end of due date or duration ?
GeneralDirection: After the end of the program. All you have to know is that if
you've played 5 battles between Dec. 20 and Jan. 10 and have a tier
10 in your garage, then you're eligible for the shirt.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 09:54:11
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348507
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:48, said: Got it, can only have fun in ways you dictate and all other fun is illegal. God forbid we're getting stomped 12-4 and I mess with my friend so we can at least get some laughs out of an otherwise garbage match. Its totally comparable to a Sheriff suicide ramming a scout into a teammate, drowning themselves and calling everybody baddies, right?
How about 8000 XP? (320 gold value)
How about a day of premium? (250 gold value)
How about 150,000 credits? (375 gold value)
How about a combo: 100,000 credits (250 gold value) and 3000 XP (120 gold value)
So many possibilities.
Link on message: #3348507
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:48, said: Got it, can only have fun in ways you dictate and all other fun is illegal. God forbid we're getting stomped 12-4 and I mess with my friend so we can at least get some laughs out of an otherwise garbage match. Its totally comparable to a Sheriff suicide ramming a scout into a teammate, drowning themselves and calling everybody baddies, right?
How about 8000 XP? (320 gold value)
How about a day of premium? (250 gold value)
How about 150,000 credits? (375 gold value)
How about a combo: 100,000 credits (250 gold value) and 3000 XP (120 gold value)
So many possibilities.
GeneralDirection: If you've witnessed that behavior then all you have to do is report
it. As you can see from the rules, access to the sheriff accounts
carries a lot of responsibility and it's very actionable if a
sheriff is doing something that will harm the experience of other
players in the battle.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 09:54:11
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348507
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:48, said: Got it, can only have fun in ways you dictate and all other fun is
illegal. God forbid we're getting stomped 12-4 and I mess with my
friend so we can at least get some laughs out of an otherwise
garbage match. Its totally comparable to a Sheriff suicide ramming
a scout into a teammate, drowning themselves and calling everybody
baddies, right?
How about 8000 XP? (320 gold value)
How about a day of premium? (250 gold value)
How about 150,000 credits? (375 gold value)
How about a combo: 100,000 credits (250 gold value) and 3000 XP (120 gold value)
So many possibilities.
Link on message: #3348507
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:48, said: Got it, can only have fun in ways you dictate and all other fun is
illegal. God forbid we're getting stomped 12-4 and I mess with my
friend so we can at least get some laughs out of an otherwise
garbage match. Its totally comparable to a Sheriff suicide ramming
a scout into a teammate, drowning themselves and calling everybody
baddies, right?How about 8000 XP? (320 gold value)
How about a day of premium? (250 gold value)
How about 150,000 credits? (375 gold value)
How about a combo: 100,000 credits (250 gold value) and 3000 XP (120 gold value)
So many possibilities.
GeneralDirection: If you've witnessed that behavior then all you have to do is report
it. As you can see from the rules, access to the sheriff accounts
carries a lot of responsibility and it's very actionable if a
sheriff is doing something that will harm the experience of other
players in the battle.
Реклама | Adv