failing to understand WG's reasoning
Дата: 28.12.2012 11:07:07
UncleDolfy, on Dec 28 2012 - 04:16, said: False dichotomy of "either we do A or we can only do B". I don't
believe that is the case, even reading how the MM algorithm works
in the wiki. That is, if you can program it to drop the cap to 5,
you can program it to drop to 3 or whatever number.It just means if there's a lot of arties player they will just have to wait a lot longer, some may just have to wait longer. But if that were the rule, and that is clearly stated, that's not MM's problem.
GeneralDirection: It isn't a situation of A or B. It's a situation of "What can we do
before completely breaking the matchmaker because of the way it
currently works?"
This will not be the last change if we need to make more. But rewriting the matchmaker when we plan to change SPGs to have the same tier range as heavies, mediums and TDs would be a pretty significant waste of development time.
This will not be the last change if we need to make more. But rewriting the matchmaker when we plan to change SPGs to have the same tier range as heavies, mediums and TDs would be a pretty significant waste of development time.
failing to understand WG's reasoning