Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 21:37:46
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3504001
WarStore, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:39, said: So you can do this when WG add new tanks to existing trees? Like
the Leopard branch this year or second german TD tree in
2020?
panzerdan412, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:42, said: So now that its does is it possible that we
get something The best Tier
7 heavy drivers of march get
..... Or maybe even roll it into the weekend
specials?
Starne, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:50, said: GD, how recently did the new techniques/technology that let's you
do this kind of "automated" contest come down the pipe? Was it
something that you guys got rather recently, and the timing was
just perfect, or was it something you guys have had for a couple
months, and you were waiting for a good chance to put it through
it's paces?
Is it safe to say that if a player can manage 1st class and Ace class Mastery Badges on a relatively consistent basis, they stand a pretty good chance?
Mercava, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:51, said: I would like to know aswell
Link on message: #3504001
WarStore, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:39, said: So you can do this when WG add new tanks to existing trees? Like
the Leopard branch this year or second german TD tree in
2020?GeneralDirection:
We'll see how this one works out and determine if we want to do another one this widespread.
We'll see how this one works out and determine if we want to do another one this widespread.
panzerdan412, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:42, said: So now that its does is it possible that we
get something The best Tier
7 heavy drivers of march get
..... Or maybe even roll it into the weekend
specials?GeneralDirection:
Yep, that's a possibility.
Yep, that's a possibility.
Starne, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:50, said: GD, how recently did the new techniques/technology that let's you
do this kind of "automated" contest come down the pipe? Was it
something that you guys got rather recently, and the timing was
just perfect, or was it something you guys have had for a couple
months, and you were waiting for a good chance to put it through
it's paces?Is it safe to say that if a player can manage 1st class and Ace class Mastery Badges on a relatively consistent basis, they stand a pretty good chance?
GeneralDirection:
Very recently. It's been in the development pipeline for quite a while now (it was inspired by the all star events), and just passed through testing about two weeks ago.
If you can score an Ace badge pretty reliably, you should have a good chance in this. Ace badges aren't given out too often, so 1st class probably has a good chance too. Ultimately it all depends on the number of each tank playing during the event.
Very recently. It's been in the development pipeline for quite a while now (it was inspired by the all star events), and just passed through testing about two weeks ago.
If you can score an Ace badge pretty reliably, you should have a good chance in this. Ace badges aren't given out too often, so 1st class probably has a good chance too. Ultimately it all depends on the number of each tank playing during the event.
Mercava, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:51, said: I would like to know aswellGeneralDirection:
Unfortunately we don't have a leader board UI for this. It's a behind-the-scenes data query at the moment. It's an idea to request for the future, but could take some time to develop.
Unfortunately we don't have a leader board UI for this. It's a behind-the-scenes data query at the moment. It's an idea to request for the future, but could take some time to develop.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 21:37:46
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3504001
WarStore, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:39, said: So you can do this when WG add new tanks to existing trees? Like
the Leopard branch this year or second german TD tree in
2020?
panzerdan412, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:42, said: So now that its does is it possible that we
get something The best Tier
7 heavy drivers of march get
..... Or maybe even roll it into the weekend
specials?
Starne, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:50, said: GD, how recently did the new techniques/technology that let's you
do this kind of "automated" contest come down the pipe? Was it
something that you guys got rather recently, and the timing was
just perfect, or was it something you guys have had for a couple
months, and you were waiting for a good chance to put it through
it's paces?
Is it safe to say that if a player can manage 1st class and Ace class Mastery Badges on a relatively consistent basis, they stand a pretty good chance?
Mercava, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:51, said: I would like to know aswell
Link on message: #3504001
WarStore, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:39, said: So you can do this when WG add new tanks to existing trees? Like
the Leopard branch this year or second german TD tree in
2020?GeneralDirection:
We'll see how this one works out and determine if we want to do another one this widespread.
We'll see how this one works out and determine if we want to do another one this widespread.
panzerdan412, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:42, said: So now that its does is it possible that we
get something The best Tier
7 heavy drivers of march get
..... Or maybe even roll it into the weekend
specials?GeneralDirection:
Yep, that's a possibility.
Yep, that's a possibility.
Starne, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:50, said: GD, how recently did the new techniques/technology that let's you
do this kind of "automated" contest come down the pipe? Was it
something that you guys got rather recently, and the timing was
just perfect, or was it something you guys have had for a couple
months, and you were waiting for a good chance to put it through
it's paces?Is it safe to say that if a player can manage 1st class and Ace class Mastery Badges on a relatively consistent basis, they stand a pretty good chance?
GeneralDirection:
Very recently. It's been in the development pipeline for quite a while now (it was inspired by the all star events), and just passed through testing about two weeks ago.
If you can score an Ace badge pretty reliably, you should have a good chance in this. Ace badges aren't given out too often, so 1st class probably has a good chance too. Ultimately it all depends on the number of each tank playing during the event.
Very recently. It's been in the development pipeline for quite a while now (it was inspired by the all star events), and just passed through testing about two weeks ago.
If you can score an Ace badge pretty reliably, you should have a good chance in this. Ace badges aren't given out too often, so 1st class probably has a good chance too. Ultimately it all depends on the number of each tank playing during the event.
Mercava, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:51, said: I would like to know aswellGeneralDirection:
Unfortunately we don't have a leader board UI for this. It's a behind-the-scenes data query at the moment. It's an idea to request for the future, but could take some time to develop.
Unfortunately we don't have a leader board UI for this. It's a behind-the-scenes data query at the moment. It's an idea to request for the future, but could take some time to develop.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:31:14
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503498
godofdun, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:29, said: So there are 17 type 59s and 62s going out as well? Or only 3, 1 for each tier group?
Link on message: #3503498
godofdun, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:29, said: So there are 17 type 59s and 62s going out as well? Or only 3, 1 for each tier group?
GeneralDirection: 17, and of course if you already own it you'll get the gold value
instead.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:31:14
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503498
godofdun, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:29, said: So there are 17 type 59s and 62s going out as well? Or only 3, 1
for each tier group?
Link on message: #3503498
godofdun, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:29, said: So there are 17 type 59s and 62s going out as well? Or only 3, 1
for each tier group?GeneralDirection:
17, and of course if you already own it you'll get the gold value instead.
17, and of course if you already own it you'll get the gold value instead.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:31:14
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503498
godofdun, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:29, said: So there are 17 type 59s and 62s going out as well? Or only 3, 1
for each tier group?
Link on message: #3503498
godofdun, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:29, said: So there are 17 type 59s and 62s going out as well? Or only 3, 1
for each tier group?GeneralDirection:
17, and of course if you already own it you'll get the gold value instead.
17, and of course if you already own it you'll get the gold value instead.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:28:10
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503466
Catatonick, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:25, said: Lets hope this is a common thing from now on... Free gold is never bad lol.
Link on message: #3503466
Catatonick, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:25, said: Lets hope this is a common thing from now on... Free gold is never bad lol.
GeneralDirection: There's a good chance it will replace some of the manual submission
contests.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:28:10
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503466
Catatonick, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:25, said: Lets hope this is a common thing from now on... Free
gold is never bad lol.
Link on message: #3503466
Catatonick, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:25, said: Lets hope this is a common thing from now on... Free
gold is never bad lol.GeneralDirection:
There's a good chance it will replace some of the manual submission contests.
There's a good chance it will replace some of the manual submission contests.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:28:10
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503466
Catatonick, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:25, said: Lets hope this is a common thing from now on... Free
gold is never bad lol.
Link on message: #3503466
Catatonick, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:25, said: Lets hope this is a common thing from now on... Free
gold is never bad lol.GeneralDirection:
There's a good chance it will replace some of the manual submission contests.
There's a good chance it will replace some of the manual submission contests.
GeneralDirection
Design Winner: Treads for Threads
16.01.2013 20:26:21
Subject: Design Winner: Treads for Threads
Link on message: #3503449
Link on message: #3503449
GeneralDirection: Hey folks,
Wanted to give an update on this. We discovered an issue with the initial data pull, so we ran another one to make sure everyone is included. We've passed the data on to have the email put together, so it should be going out shortly.
Wanted to give an update on this. We discovered an issue with the initial data pull, so we ran another one to make sure everyone is included. We've passed the data on to have the email put together, so it should be going out shortly.
GeneralDirection
Design Winner: Treads for Threads
16.01.2013 20:26:21
Subject: Design Winner: Treads for Threads
Link on message: #3503449
Link on message: #3503449
GeneralDirection: Hey folks,
Wanted to give an update on this. We discovered an issue with the initial data pull, so we ran another one to make sure everyone is included. We've passed the data on to have the email put together, so it should be going out shortly.
Wanted to give an update on this. We discovered an issue with the initial data pull, so we ran another one to make sure everyone is included. We've passed the data on to have the email put together, so it should be going out shortly.
GeneralDirection
Design Winner: Treads for Threads
16.01.2013 20:26:21
Subject: Design Winner: Treads for Threads
Link on message: #3503449
Link on message: #3503449
GeneralDirection: Hey folks,
Wanted to give an update on this. We discovered an issue with the initial data pull, so we ran another one to make sure everyone is included. We've passed the data on to have the email put together, so it should be going out shortly.
Wanted to give an update on this. We discovered an issue with the initial data pull, so we ran another one to make sure everyone is included. We've passed the data on to have the email put together, so it should be going out shortly.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:24:41
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503430
WarStore, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:22, said: Why only the chinese tree gets this contest? Why didn't the brits, germans or even the ruskies get this contest?
Link on message: #3503430
WarStore, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:22, said: Why only the chinese tree gets this contest? Why didn't the brits, germans or even the ruskies get this contest?
GeneralDirection: The functionality didn't exist then. It does now, so we decided to
give it a test drive.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:24:41
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503430
WarStore, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:22, said: Why only the chinese tree gets this contest? Why didn't the brits,
germans or even the ruskies get this contest?
Link on message: #3503430
WarStore, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:22, said: Why only the chinese tree gets this contest? Why didn't the brits,
germans or even the ruskies get this contest?GeneralDirection:
The functionality didn't exist then. It does now, so we decided to give it a test drive.
The functionality didn't exist then. It does now, so we decided to give it a test drive.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:24:41
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503430
WarStore, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:22, said: Why only the chinese tree gets this contest? Why didn't the brits,
germans or even the ruskies get this contest?
Link on message: #3503430
WarStore, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:22, said: Why only the chinese tree gets this contest? Why didn't the brits,
germans or even the ruskies get this contest?GeneralDirection:
The functionality didn't exist then. It does now, so we decided to give it a test drive.
The functionality didn't exist then. It does now, so we decided to give it a test drive.
GeneralDirection
Heavy Destruction Weekend
16.01.2013 20:04:49
Subject: Heavy Destruction Weekend
Link on message: #3503251
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 16:42, said: Really, what more proof do you need? Call it errors or
typos, WG goofed up. What makes this so bad is the poor
responses and unprofessional cover ups meant to conceal those
errors to history. The main point being, the way most of
the Mods (Major_Rampage is the only exception in my view) and WG
have responded to this screw up, is bad customer support and
verging on underhanded. You are not helping to improve
that perception and should leave any future comment to someone
willing to accept that WG and Mods made mistakes here, and be
genuinely appologetic that you've done so.
Link on message: #3503251
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 16:42, said: Really, what more proof do you need? Call it errors or
typos, WG goofed up. What makes this so bad is the poor
responses and unprofessional cover ups meant to conceal those
errors to history. The main point being, the way most of
the Mods (Major_Rampage is the only exception in my view) and WG
have responded to this screw up, is bad customer support and
verging on underhanded. You are not helping to improve
that perception and should leave any future comment to someone
willing to accept that WG and Mods made mistakes here, and be
genuinely appologetic that you've done so.GeneralDirection: I have been very apologetic all over the forum regarding this. I'm
struggling to understand how you're taking issue with my request to
point out who claimed it was a typo.
GeneralDirection
Heavy Destruction Weekend
16.01.2013 20:04:49
Subject: Heavy Destruction Weekend
Link on message: #3503251
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 16:42, said: Really, what more proof do you need? Call it errors or
typos, WG goofed up. What makes this so bad is the poor
responses and unprofessional cover ups meant to conceal those
errors to history. The main point being, the way most of
the Mods (Major_Rampage is the only exception in my view) and WG
have responded to this screw up, is bad customer support and
verging on underhanded. You are not helping to improve
that perception and should leave any future comment to someone
willing to accept that WG and Mods made mistakes here, and be
genuinely appologetic that you've done so.
Link on message: #3503251
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 16:42, said: Really, what more proof do you need? Call it errors or
typos, WG goofed up. What makes this so bad is the poor
responses and unprofessional cover ups meant to conceal those
errors to history. The main point being, the way most of
the Mods (Major_Rampage is the only exception in my view) and WG
have responded to this screw up, is bad customer support and
verging on underhanded. You are not helping to improve
that perception and should leave any future comment to someone
willing to accept that WG and Mods made mistakes here, and be
genuinely appologetic that you've done so.GeneralDirection:
I have been very apologetic all over the forum regarding this. I'm struggling to understand how you're taking issue with my request to point out who claimed it was a typo.
I have been very apologetic all over the forum regarding this. I'm struggling to understand how you're taking issue with my request to point out who claimed it was a typo.
GeneralDirection
Heavy Destruction Weekend
16.01.2013 20:04:49
Subject: Heavy Destruction Weekend
Link on message: #3503251
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 16:42, said: Really, what more proof do you need? Call it errors or
typos, WG goofed up. What makes this so bad is the poor
responses and unprofessional cover ups meant to conceal those
errors to history. The main point being, the way most of
the Mods (Major_Rampage is the only exception in my view) and WG
have responded to this screw up, is bad customer support and
verging on underhanded. You are not helping to improve
that perception and should leave any future comment to someone
willing to accept that WG and Mods made mistakes here, and be
genuinely appologetic that you've done so.
Link on message: #3503251
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 16:42, said: Really, what more proof do you need? Call it errors or
typos, WG goofed up. What makes this so bad is the poor
responses and unprofessional cover ups meant to conceal those
errors to history. The main point being, the way most of
the Mods (Major_Rampage is the only exception in my view) and WG
have responded to this screw up, is bad customer support and
verging on underhanded. You are not helping to improve
that perception and should leave any future comment to someone
willing to accept that WG and Mods made mistakes here, and be
genuinely appologetic that you've done so.GeneralDirection:
I have been very apologetic all over the forum regarding this. I'm struggling to understand how you're taking issue with my request to point out who claimed it was a typo.
I have been very apologetic all over the forum regarding this. I'm struggling to understand how you're taking issue with my request to point out who claimed it was a typo.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:00:20
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503208
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:56, said: Then how can "accelerated training" have any effect on anything related to this contest since the MAXIMUM XP rating is right there in the "service record" and can be easily pulled from your database?
Well max xp is certainly better than total though nowhere does it actually say max xp, it says "Top 100 Players (XP Earned)" xp earned sure sounds like total xp to me.
Max XP isn't an indication of skill either, in fact, skilled players don't usually have very high max xp unless they get really lucky at some point. It's mostly the unskilled players that take enormous risks that eventually earn them a huge xp reward amidst countless complete fails.
Link on message: #3503208
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:56, said: Then how can "accelerated training" have any effect on anything related to this contest since the MAXIMUM XP rating is right there in the "service record" and can be easily pulled from your database?
Well max xp is certainly better than total though nowhere does it actually say max xp, it says "Top 100 Players (XP Earned)" xp earned sure sounds like total xp to me.
Max XP isn't an indication of skill either, in fact, skilled players don't usually have very high max xp unless they get really lucky at some point. It's mostly the unskilled players that take enormous risks that eventually earn them a huge xp reward amidst countless complete fails.
GeneralDirection: Accelerated training prevented it from registering as a max
experience score. That was actually just fixed though, so it's no
longer an issue here.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:00:20
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503208
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:56, said: Then how can "accelerated training" have any effect on anything
related to this contest since the MAXIMUM XP rating is right there
in the "service record" and can be easily pulled from your
database?
Well max xp is certainly better than total though nowhere does it actually say max xp, it says "Top 100 Players (XP Earned)" xp earned sure sounds like total xp to me.
Max XP isn't an indication of skill either, in fact, skilled players don't usually have very high max xp unless they get really lucky at some point. It's mostly the unskilled players that take enormous risks that eventually earn them a huge xp reward amidst countless complete fails.
Link on message: #3503208
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:56, said: Then how can "accelerated training" have any effect on anything
related to this contest since the MAXIMUM XP rating is right there
in the "service record" and can be easily pulled from your
database?Well max xp is certainly better than total though nowhere does it actually say max xp, it says "Top 100 Players (XP Earned)" xp earned sure sounds like total xp to me.
Max XP isn't an indication of skill either, in fact, skilled players don't usually have very high max xp unless they get really lucky at some point. It's mostly the unskilled players that take enormous risks that eventually earn them a huge xp reward amidst countless complete fails.
GeneralDirection:
Accelerated training prevented it from registering as a max experience score. That was actually just fixed though, so it's no longer an issue here.
Accelerated training prevented it from registering as a max experience score. That was actually just fixed though, so it's no longer an issue here.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 20:00:20
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503208
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:56, said: Then how can "accelerated training" have any effect on anything
related to this contest since the MAXIMUM XP rating is right there
in the "service record" and can be easily pulled from your
database?
Well max xp is certainly better than total though nowhere does it actually say max xp, it says "Top 100 Players (XP Earned)" xp earned sure sounds like total xp to me.
Max XP isn't an indication of skill either, in fact, skilled players don't usually have very high max xp unless they get really lucky at some point. It's mostly the unskilled players that take enormous risks that eventually earn them a huge xp reward amidst countless complete fails.
Link on message: #3503208
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:56, said: Then how can "accelerated training" have any effect on anything
related to this contest since the MAXIMUM XP rating is right there
in the "service record" and can be easily pulled from your
database?Well max xp is certainly better than total though nowhere does it actually say max xp, it says "Top 100 Players (XP Earned)" xp earned sure sounds like total xp to me.
Max XP isn't an indication of skill either, in fact, skilled players don't usually have very high max xp unless they get really lucky at some point. It's mostly the unskilled players that take enormous risks that eventually earn them a huge xp reward amidst countless complete fails.
GeneralDirection:
Accelerated training prevented it from registering as a max experience score. That was actually just fixed though, so it's no longer an issue here.
Accelerated training prevented it from registering as a max experience score. That was actually just fixed though, so it's no longer an issue here.
dance210
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:56:29
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503177
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:54, said: Here, let us show you the difference:
Premium tank prize:
EU server, "But that’s not all! Additionally the Top 3 from each of the 17 Top 100 Lists will receive:..."
NA Server, ""If you manage to make it into the "Top 3" in any of the tier groups, you'll be rewarded with..." (Note the NA announcment has 3 tier groups, not 17 tanks.)
Gold prize:
EU server, "As there are 17 tanks this means there will be 17 top 100 groups."
NA server, "place in the top 100 of XP earners in any of the following groups, and you'll be rewarded with gold" (Note the NA announcement has only the 3 tier groups."
GeneralDirection, I used to respect you. Today, I am thinking the real GeneralDirection sold his account to some brainless noob. Please, WG, I miss the old GeneralDirection. Please bring him back.
Link on message: #3503177
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 19:54, said: Here, let us show you the difference:Premium tank prize:
EU server, "But that’s not all! Additionally the Top 3 from each of the 17 Top 100 Lists will receive:..."
NA Server, ""If you manage to make it into the "Top 3" in any of the tier groups, you'll be rewarded with..." (Note the NA announcment has 3 tier groups, not 17 tanks.)
Gold prize:
EU server, "As there are 17 tanks this means there will be 17 top 100 groups."
NA server, "place in the top 100 of XP earners in any of the following groups, and you'll be rewarded with gold" (Note the NA announcement has only the 3 tier groups."
GeneralDirection, I used to respect you. Today, I am thinking the real GeneralDirection sold his account to some brainless noob. Please, WG, I miss the old GeneralDirection. Please bring him back.
dance210: And if you keep reading, you will realize that he acknowledged that
how it was written is incorrect and doesn't fit what EU and RU
have.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:56:13
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503174
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:54, said: Here, let us show you the difference:
Premium tank prize:
EU server, "But that’s not all! Additionally the Top 3 from each of the 17 Top 100 Lists will receive:..."
NA Server, ""If you manage to make it into the "Top 3" in any of the tier groups, you'll be rewarded with..." (Note the NA announcment has 3 tier groups, not 17 tanks.)
Gold prize:
EU server, "As there are 17 tanks this means there will be 17 top 100 groups."
NA server, "place in the top 100 of XP earners in any of the following groups, and you'll be rewarded with gold" (Note the NA announcement has only the 3 tier groups."
GeneralDirection, I used to respect you. Today, I am thinking the real GeneralDirection sold his account to some brainless noob. Please, WG, I miss the old GeneralDirection. Please bring him back.
Link on message: #3503174
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:54, said: Here, let us show you the difference:
Premium tank prize:
EU server, "But that’s not all! Additionally the Top 3 from each of the 17 Top 100 Lists will receive:..."
NA Server, ""If you manage to make it into the "Top 3" in any of the tier groups, you'll be rewarded with..." (Note the NA announcment has 3 tier groups, not 17 tanks.)
Gold prize:
EU server, "As there are 17 tanks this means there will be 17 top 100 groups."
NA server, "place in the top 100 of XP earners in any of the following groups, and you'll be rewarded with gold" (Note the NA announcement has only the 3 tier groups."
GeneralDirection, I used to respect you. Today, I am thinking the real GeneralDirection sold his account to some brainless noob. Please, WG, I miss the old GeneralDirection. Please bring him back.
GeneralDirection: You should read beyond the first post before insulting me. I
already confirm I requested changes to the article to make it more
clear.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:56:13
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503174
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:54, said: Here, let us show you the difference:
Premium tank prize:
EU server, "But that’s not all! Additionally the Top 3 from each of the 17 Top 100 Lists will receive:..."
NA Server, ""If you manage to make it into the "Top 3" in any of the tier groups, you'll be rewarded with..." (Note the NA announcment has 3 tier groups, not 17 tanks.)
Gold prize:
EU server, "As there are 17 tanks this means there will be 17 top 100 groups."
NA server, "place in the top 100 of XP earners in any of the following groups, and you'll be rewarded with gold" (Note the NA announcement has only the 3 tier groups."
GeneralDirection, I used to respect you. Today, I am thinking the real GeneralDirection sold his account to some brainless noob. Please, WG, I miss the old GeneralDirection. Please bring him back.
Link on message: #3503174
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:54, said: Here, let us show you the difference:Premium tank prize:
EU server, "But that’s not all! Additionally the Top 3 from each of the 17 Top 100 Lists will receive:..."
NA Server, ""If you manage to make it into the "Top 3" in any of the tier groups, you'll be rewarded with..." (Note the NA announcment has 3 tier groups, not 17 tanks.)
Gold prize:
EU server, "As there are 17 tanks this means there will be 17 top 100 groups."
NA server, "place in the top 100 of XP earners in any of the following groups, and you'll be rewarded with gold" (Note the NA announcement has only the 3 tier groups."
GeneralDirection, I used to respect you. Today, I am thinking the real GeneralDirection sold his account to some brainless noob. Please, WG, I miss the old GeneralDirection. Please bring him back.
GeneralDirection:
You should read beyond the first post before insulting me. I already confirm I requested changes to the article to make it more clear.
You should read beyond the first post before insulting me. I already confirm I requested changes to the article to make it more clear.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:56:13
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503174
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:54, said: Here, let us show you the difference:
Premium tank prize:
EU server, "But that’s not all! Additionally the Top 3 from each of the 17 Top 100 Lists will receive:..."
NA Server, ""If you manage to make it into the "Top 3" in any of the tier groups, you'll be rewarded with..." (Note the NA announcment has 3 tier groups, not 17 tanks.)
Gold prize:
EU server, "As there are 17 tanks this means there will be 17 top 100 groups."
NA server, "place in the top 100 of XP earners in any of the following groups, and you'll be rewarded with gold" (Note the NA announcement has only the 3 tier groups."
GeneralDirection, I used to respect you. Today, I am thinking the real GeneralDirection sold his account to some brainless noob. Please, WG, I miss the old GeneralDirection. Please bring him back.
Link on message: #3503174
3BAC, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:54, said: Here, let us show you the difference:Premium tank prize:
EU server, "But that’s not all! Additionally the Top 3 from each of the 17 Top 100 Lists will receive:..."
NA Server, ""If you manage to make it into the "Top 3" in any of the tier groups, you'll be rewarded with..." (Note the NA announcment has 3 tier groups, not 17 tanks.)
Gold prize:
EU server, "As there are 17 tanks this means there will be 17 top 100 groups."
NA server, "place in the top 100 of XP earners in any of the following groups, and you'll be rewarded with gold" (Note the NA announcement has only the 3 tier groups."
GeneralDirection, I used to respect you. Today, I am thinking the real GeneralDirection sold his account to some brainless noob. Please, WG, I miss the old GeneralDirection. Please bring him back.
GeneralDirection:
You should read beyond the first post before insulting me. I already confirm I requested changes to the article to make it more clear.
You should read beyond the first post before insulting me. I already confirm I requested changes to the article to make it more clear.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:48:21
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503111
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:45, said: Total XP... This does NOT reward skill, only XP grinding. Why come up with such a retarded contest?
Link on message: #3503111
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:45, said: Total XP... This does NOT reward skill, only XP grinding. Why come up with such a retarded contest?
GeneralDirection: It's not total xp. It's maximum xp.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:48:21
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503111
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:45, said: Total XP... This does NOT reward skill, only XP grinding. Why come
up with such a retarded contest?
Link on message: #3503111
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:45, said: Total XP... This does NOT reward skill, only XP grinding. Why come
up with such a retarded contest?GeneralDirection:
It's not total xp. It's maximum xp.
It's not total xp. It's maximum xp.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:48:21
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503111
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:45, said: Total XP... This does NOT reward skill, only XP grinding. Why come
up with such a retarded contest?
Link on message: #3503111
Verilogus, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:45, said: Total XP... This does NOT reward skill, only XP grinding. Why come
up with such a retarded contest?GeneralDirection:
It's not total xp. It's maximum xp.
It's not total xp. It's maximum xp.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:39:18
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503047
SaVaGee, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:38, said: It reads differently than the EU version.
Link on message: #3503047
SaVaGee, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:38, said: It reads differently than the EU version.
GeneralDirection: You're correct. I'm asking for changes right now.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:39:18
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503047
SaVaGee, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:38, said: It reads differently than the EU version.
Link on message: #3503047
SaVaGee, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:38, said: It reads differently than the EU version.GeneralDirection:
You're correct. I'm asking for changes right now.
You're correct. I'm asking for changes right now.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:39:18
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503047
SaVaGee, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:38, said: It reads differently than the EU version.
Link on message: #3503047
SaVaGee, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:38, said: It reads differently than the EU version.GeneralDirection:
You're correct. I'm asking for changes right now.
You're correct. I'm asking for changes right now.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:35:29
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503014
Striker_002, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:20, said: As much as i like contests for free stuff, it is a slap to the face when the EU server gets about 6 times the amount of prize winners as we do.
Ours is divided into 3 tier groups, they get 17, one for each tank.
here cometh the rage from many NA players.
Link on message: #3503014
Striker_002, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:20, said: As much as i like contests for free stuff, it is a slap to the face when the EU server gets about 6 times the amount of prize winners as we do.
Ours is divided into 3 tier groups, they get 17, one for each tank.
here cometh the rage from many NA players.
GeneralDirection: What? It's the exact same event.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:35:29
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503014
Striker_002, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:20, said: As much as i like contests for free stuff, it is a slap to the face
when the EU server gets about 6 times the amount of prize winners
as we do.
Ours is divided into 3 tier groups, they get 17, one for each tank.
here cometh the rage from many NA players.
Link on message: #3503014
Striker_002, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:20, said: As much as i like contests for free stuff, it is a slap to the face
when the EU server gets about 6 times the amount of prize winners
as we do.Ours is divided into 3 tier groups, they get 17, one for each tank.
here cometh the rage from many NA players.
GeneralDirection:
What? It's the exact same event.
What? It's the exact same event.
GeneralDirection
8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
16.01.2013 19:35:29
Subject: 8.3 Contest "The Art of War"
Link on message: #3503014
Striker_002, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:20, said: As much as i like contests for free stuff, it is a slap to the face
when the EU server gets about 6 times the amount of prize winners
as we do.
Ours is divided into 3 tier groups, they get 17, one for each tank.
here cometh the rage from many NA players.
Link on message: #3503014
Striker_002, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:20, said: As much as i like contests for free stuff, it is a slap to the face
when the EU server gets about 6 times the amount of prize winners
as we do.Ours is divided into 3 tier groups, they get 17, one for each tank.
here cometh the rage from many NA players.
GeneralDirection:
What? It's the exact same event.
What? It's the exact same event.
Yoott
About cheating
16.01.2013 18:22:46
Subject: About cheating
Link on message: #3502518
clownshoes2, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:21, said: So if the crew has a gold medpack, does the tank become "active"
again.
Link on message: #3502518
clownshoes2, on Jan 16 2013 - 18:21, said: So if the crew has a gold medpack, does the tank become "active"
again.Yoott: noone to apply the magic bandaid so no... you lose all crew the
tank is basically dead...... no way to restart it..
Yoott
About cheating
16.01.2013 18:17:25
Subject: About cheating
Link on message: #3502468
Link on message: #3502468
Yoott: Please post .. the other 100000000000000 posters never had any real
proof of them ... maybe you do.. lets see it...
GeneralDirection
Heavy Destruction Weekend
16.01.2013 16:49:17
Subject: Heavy Destruction Weekend
Link on message: #3501809
Moonrider, on Jan 16 2013 - 15:43, said: Major_Rampage, Minister_of_Propaganda - The early end
upset me a bit, but what really set me off was the transparent
attempt to deceive us that a mistake in setting up the event had
NOT been made, and a typo had been made in the date for every
announcement since mid December. Complete with going through and
editing the date in every single announcement that mentioned it.
The announcement that's up there NOW is what should have gone up
Sunday morning.
It was trying to lie to us that got everyone so angry, myself included.
Link on message: #3501809
Moonrider, on Jan 16 2013 - 15:43, said: Major_Rampage, Minister_of_Propaganda - The early end
upset me a bit, but what really set me off was the transparent
attempt to deceive us that a mistake in setting up the event had
NOT been made, and a typo had been made in the date for every
announcement since mid December. Complete with going through and
editing the date in every single announcement that mentioned it.
The announcement that's up there NOW is what should have gone up
Sunday morning.It was trying to lie to us that got everyone so angry, myself included.
GeneralDirection: Hi Moonrider,
If you can provide me with proof of someone claiming this as a typo I will look into it. However, I do not see any case of that right now.
If you can provide me with proof of someone claiming this as a typo I will look into it. However, I do not see any case of that right now.
GeneralDirection
Heavy Destruction Weekend
16.01.2013 16:49:17
Subject: Heavy Destruction Weekend
Link on message: #3501809
Moonrider, on Jan 16 2013 - 15:43, said: Major_Rampage, Minister_of_Propaganda - The early end
upset me a bit, but what really set me off was the transparent
attempt to deceive us that a mistake in setting up the event had
NOT been made, and a typo had been made in the date for every
announcement since mid December. Complete with going through and
editing the date in every single announcement that mentioned it.
The announcement that's up there NOW is what should have gone up
Sunday morning.
It was trying to lie to us that got everyone so angry, myself included.
Link on message: #3501809
Moonrider, on Jan 16 2013 - 15:43, said: Major_Rampage, Minister_of_Propaganda - The early end
upset me a bit, but what really set me off was the transparent
attempt to deceive us that a mistake in setting up the event had
NOT been made, and a typo had been made in the date for every
announcement since mid December. Complete with going through and
editing the date in every single announcement that mentioned it.
The announcement that's up there NOW is what should have gone up
Sunday morning.It was trying to lie to us that got everyone so angry, myself included.
GeneralDirection:
Hi Moonrider,
If you can provide me with proof of someone claiming this as a typo I will look into it. However, I do not see any case of that right now.
Hi Moonrider,
If you can provide me with proof of someone claiming this as a typo I will look into it. However, I do not see any case of that right now.
GeneralDirection
Heavy Destruction Weekend
16.01.2013 16:49:17
Subject: Heavy Destruction Weekend
Link on message: #3501809
Moonrider, on Jan 16 2013 - 15:43, said: Major_Rampage, Minister_of_Propaganda - The early end
upset me a bit, but what really set me off was the transparent
attempt to deceive us that a mistake in setting up the event had
NOT been made, and a typo had been made in the date for every
announcement since mid December. Complete with going through and
editing the date in every single announcement that mentioned it.
The announcement that's up there NOW is what should have gone up
Sunday morning.
It was trying to lie to us that got everyone so angry, myself included.
Link on message: #3501809
Moonrider, on Jan 16 2013 - 15:43, said: Major_Rampage, Minister_of_Propaganda - The early end
upset me a bit, but what really set me off was the transparent
attempt to deceive us that a mistake in setting up the event had
NOT been made, and a typo had been made in the date for every
announcement since mid December. Complete with going through and
editing the date in every single announcement that mentioned it.
The announcement that's up there NOW is what should have gone up
Sunday morning.It was trying to lie to us that got everyone so angry, myself included.
GeneralDirection:
Hi Moonrider,
If you can provide me with proof of someone claiming this as a typo I will look into it. However, I do not see any case of that right now.
Hi Moonrider,
If you can provide me with proof of someone claiming this as a typo I will look into it. However, I do not see any case of that right now.
Yoott
Fix matchmaker or I'm out for good (devs read!)
16.01.2013 16:37:33
Subject: Fix matchmaker or I'm out for good (devs read!)
Link on message: #3501713
Link on message: #3501713
Yoott: ... has anyone ever brought this argument up before? ... hmm
yep
oh and has anyone ever threatened to leave and stomp their feet like a child unless they get their way..... hmm yep
hello kitties magical isle adventure may be more your style...
oh and has anyone ever threatened to leave and stomp their feet like a child unless they get their way..... hmm yep
hello kitties magical isle adventure may be more your style...
Yoott
lemmings
16.01.2013 01:28:19
Реклама | Adv