Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Major League Championship Series, Summer 2013
Link on message: #4824253
stagnate, on Jul 01 2013 - 21:10, said: What happens to teams 7-12?
Link on message: #4824253
stagnate, on Jul 01 2013 - 21:10, said: What happens to teams 7-12?dance210: No change in status; they stay in the Major League and try again
next season, if they so desire.
Subject: Skirmish 25
Link on message: #4824241
GenPanzer, on Jul 01 2013 - 20:49, said: Why do you continue to be ambiguous?
Don't tell me "We might extend the entrants." Then say "Well if you don't get in the top 64, you likely won't play."
I feel like a dog chasing his tail.
Link on message: #4824241
GenPanzer, on Jul 01 2013 - 20:49, said: Why do you continue to be ambiguous?Don't tell me "We might extend the entrants." Then say "Well if you don't get in the top 64, you likely won't play."
I feel like a dog chasing his tail.
dance210: At times, they have accepted 128 teams (two full brackets, 64 teams
/ bracket). I believe this is done only when enough teams apply and
can be accepted. So, Judo is being ambiguous because they WILL
occasionally accept more than 64 teams, but you can only assume
your team is accepted if you are one of the first 64 to apply as
there is not always enough teams to fill 128 spots. Hope that
clears up some of your confusion...
Subject: Skirmish 25
Link on message: #4823556
GenPanzer, on Jul 01 2013 - 20:40, said: That's what I figured you'd say. So,
A) Why not specify that in original announcement?
B) I'm assuming that process is done manually, so who makes that call?
C) How long does it take to decide that?
D) Why can't that all be done in a much more timely manner instead of 2 hours before the battles start?
E) Why not within 2 hours after the first 64 are picked?
F) And finally, will all the remaining teams be changed to Denied after that decision is made?
Link on message: #4823556
GenPanzer, on Jul 01 2013 - 20:40, said: That's what I figured you'd say. So,A) Why not specify that in original announcement?
B) I'm assuming that process is done manually, so who makes that call?
C) How long does it take to decide that?
D) Why can't that all be done in a much more timely manner instead of 2 hours before the battles start?
E) Why not within 2 hours after the first 64 are picked?
F) And finally, will all the remaining teams be changed to Denied after that decision is made?
Captain_Judo: Your best bet is being in the first 64. If you don't make the first
64, then you're unlikely to play.
Subject: Skirmish 25
Link on message: #4823556
GenPanzer, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:40, said: That's what I figured you'd say. So,
A) Why not specify that in original announcement?
B) I'm assuming that process is done manually, so who makes that call?
C) How long does it take to decide that?
D) Why can't that all be done in a much more timely manner instead of 2 hours before the battles start?
E) Why not within 2 hours after the first 64 are picked?
F) And finally, will all the remaining teams be changed to Denied after that decision is made?
Link on message: #4823556
GenPanzer, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:40, said: That's what I figured you'd say. So,A) Why not specify that in original announcement?
B) I'm assuming that process is done manually, so who makes that call?
C) How long does it take to decide that?
D) Why can't that all be done in a much more timely manner instead of 2 hours before the battles start?
E) Why not within 2 hours after the first 64 are picked?
F) And finally, will all the remaining teams be changed to Denied after that decision is made?
Captain_Judo:
Your best bet is being in the first 64. If you don't make the first 64, then you're unlikely to play.
Your best bet is being in the first 64. If you don't make the first 64, then you're unlikely to play.
Subject: Major League Championship Series, Summer 2013
Link on message: #4823542
RedPrince42, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:30, said: That would be the expectation, but can your tools handle it? The
grid doesn't have a slot for draws . . . just wins and losses.
Link on message: #4823542
RedPrince42, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:30, said: That would be the expectation, but can your tools handle it? The
grid doesn't have a slot for draws . . . just wins and losses.Captain_Judo: We'll make sure our team adds an updated table for this season.
Subject: Major League Championship Series, Summer 2013
Link on message: #4823542
RedPrince42, on Jul 01 2013 - 18:30, said: That would be the expectation, but can your tools handle it? The
grid doesn't have a slot for draws . . . just wins and losses.
Link on message: #4823542
RedPrince42, on Jul 01 2013 - 18:30, said: That would be the expectation, but can your tools handle it? The
grid doesn't have a slot for draws . . . just wins and losses.Captain_Judo:
We'll make sure our team adds an updated table for this season.
We'll make sure our team adds an updated table for this season.
Subject: Event?
Link on message: #4823506
murderswitch, on Jul 01 2013 - 20:25, said: how about you tell us what is going on with CW Yoott
Link on message: #4823506
murderswitch, on Jul 01 2013 - 20:25, said: how about you tell us what is going on with CW YoottYoott: No idea at this point as I'm not involved in it as I'm on the
eSports side but keep posted to this thread for more
info http://forum.worldof...l-info-and-faq/
on the CW stuff
Subject: Event?
Link on message: #4823506
murderswitch, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:25, said: how about you tell us what is going on with CW Yoott
Link on message: #4823506
murderswitch, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:25, said: how about you tell us what is going on with CW YoottYoott: No idea at this point as I'm not involved in it as I'm on the
eSports side but keep posted to this thread for more
info http://forum.worldof...l-info-and-faq/
on the CW stuff
Subject: New Missions System Revealed
Link on message: #4823403
Snoozer, on Jul 01 2013 - 20:18, said: Wow 100exp and 5000 credits? Don't give away the store...
i hope the next mission reward will be butterfly kisses and girly giggles.
Link on message: #4823403
Snoozer, on Jul 01 2013 - 20:18, said: Wow 100exp and 5000 credits? Don't give away the store...i hope the next mission reward will be butterfly kisses and girly giggles.
GeneralDirection: Yes, 100 experience and 5000 credits at tier I. That's 1000
experience and 50000 credits at tier X.
Subject: New Missions System Revealed
Link on message: #4823403
Snoozer, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:18, said: Wow 100exp and 5000 credits? Don't give away the store...
i hope the next mission reward will be butterfly kisses and girly giggles.
Link on message: #4823403
Snoozer, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:18, said: Wow 100exp and 5000 credits? Don't give away the store...i hope the next mission reward will be butterfly kisses and girly giggles.
GeneralDirection:
Yes, 100 experience and 5000 credits at tier I. That's 1000 experience and 50000 credits at tier X.
Yes, 100 experience and 5000 credits at tier I. That's 1000 experience and 50000 credits at tier X.
Subject: New Missions System Revealed
Link on message: #4823403
Snoozer, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:18, said: Wow 100exp and 5000 credits? Don't give away the store...
i hope the next mission reward will be butterfly kisses and girly giggles.
Link on message: #4823403
Snoozer, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:18, said: Wow 100exp and 5000 credits? Don't give away the store...i hope the next mission reward will be butterfly kisses and girly giggles.
GeneralDirection:
Yes, 100 experience and 5000 credits at tier I. That's 1000 experience and 50000 credits at tier X.
Yes, 100 experience and 5000 credits at tier I. That's 1000 experience and 50000 credits at tier X.
Subject: New Missions System Revealed
Link on message: #4823403
Snoozer, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:18, said: Wow 100exp and 5000 credits? Don't give away the store...
i hope the next mission reward will be butterfly kisses and girly giggles.
Link on message: #4823403
Snoozer, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:18, said: Wow 100exp and 5000 credits? Don't give away the store...i hope the next mission reward will be butterfly kisses and girly giggles.
GeneralDirection:
Yes, 100 experience and 5000 credits at tier I. That's 1000 experience and 50000 credits at tier X.
Yes, 100 experience and 5000 credits at tier I. That's 1000 experience and 50000 credits at tier X.
Subject: Event?
Link on message: #4823195
Knightmare93, on Jul 01 2013 - 20:02, said: Did you kill off 3 tanks? This would apply: http://worldoftanks....ystem-revealed/
Link on message: #4823195
Knightmare93, on Jul 01 2013 - 20:02, said: Did you kill off 3 tanks? This would apply: http://worldoftanks....ystem-revealed/Yoott: and http://worldoftanks....4202-july-1-15/
Subject: Event?
Link on message: #4823195
Knightmare93, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:02, said: Did you kill off 3 tanks? This would apply: http://worldoftanks....ystem-revealed/
Link on message: #4823195
Knightmare93, on Jul 01 2013 - 19:02, said: Did you kill off 3 tanks? This would apply: http://worldoftanks....ystem-revealed/Yoott: and http://worldoftanks....4202-july-1-15/
Subject: Skirmish 23
Link on message: #4822287
Link on message: #4822287
Captain_Judo: This should've been paid out quite some time ago. If it hasn't
reached your account, please PM me.
Subject: Skirmish 23
Link on message: #4822287
Link on message: #4822287
Captain_Judo: This should've been paid out quite some time ago. If it hasn't
reached your account, please PM me.
Subject: Skirmish 25
Link on message: #4822253
trickster, on Jul 01 2013 - 11:11, said: Yes but you keep the submission dates secret or the last modified
date is the submission. If the last modified date is the submission
date then there is your proof. If you keep the submission date a
secret or unviewable then we have no way of proving that the system
is wrong. Make the submission date viewable by all to keep
everything above board. Other wise let everyone know who can get in
or can not get so we don't need to waste time trying to get players
interested in these type of events. Thank you very much for your
time in responding to this.
GenPanzer, on Jul 01 2013 - 13:42, said: I have "checked" your system once and it seemed to be working fine
as far as picking teams that submitted first. But, with that said,
I'd say your system is still somewhat "broken" as it hasn't
automatically denied everyone else.What this does is leaves those
teams that are really denied, still guessing and preparing for
something that isn't going to happen. If the system can
automatically accept the maximum allowed teams, and can identify
those teams that are incomplete or over the maximum allowed, why
can't it automatically deny everyone else?
Link on message: #4822253
trickster, on Jul 01 2013 - 11:11, said: Yes but you keep the submission dates secret or the last modified
date is the submission. If the last modified date is the submission
date then there is your proof. If you keep the submission date a
secret or unviewable then we have no way of proving that the system
is wrong. Make the submission date viewable by all to keep
everything above board. Other wise let everyone know who can get in
or can not get so we don't need to waste time trying to get players
interested in these type of events. Thank you very much for your
time in responding to this.Captain_Judo: The submission date is not a secret. This is publicly accessible by
modifying the search criteria in the registration.
Next time, go to the registration page and
1) under the "filter by status" dropdown, select "pending approval"
2) under the "sort by" dropdown, select "status change"
The system will then sort all teams that are pending approval based on the time they submitted their team for approval.
This and other useful information is contained in our FAQ.
Next time, go to the registration page and
1) under the "filter by status" dropdown, select "pending approval"
2) under the "sort by" dropdown, select "status change"
The system will then sort all teams that are pending approval based on the time they submitted their team for approval.
This and other useful information is contained in our FAQ.
GenPanzer, on Jul 01 2013 - 13:42, said: I have "checked" your system once and it seemed to be working fine
as far as picking teams that submitted first. But, with that said,
I'd say your system is still somewhat "broken" as it hasn't
automatically denied everyone else.What this does is leaves those
teams that are really denied, still guessing and preparing for
something that isn't going to happen. If the system can
automatically accept the maximum allowed teams, and can identify
those teams that are incomplete or over the maximum allowed, why
can't it automatically deny everyone else?Captain_Judo: We leave it open to allow for he possibility of a second, 64 team
bracket. Follow the directions I posted above to see where your
team stands in the queue and determine if you're likely accepted or
not.
Subject: Skirmish 25
Link on message: #4822253
trickster, on Jul 01 2013 - 10:11, said: Yes but you keep the submission dates secret or the last modified
date is the submission. If the last modified date is the submission
date then there is your proof. If you keep the submission date a
secret or unviewable then we have no way of proving that the system
is wrong. Make the submission date viewable by all to keep
everything above board. Other wise let everyone know who can get in
or can not get so we don't need to waste time trying to get players
interested in these type of events. Thank you very much for your
time in responding to this.
GenPanzer, on Jul 01 2013 - 12:42, said: I have "checked" your system once and it seemed to be working fine
as far as picking teams that submitted first. But, with that said,
I'd say your system is still somewhat "broken" as it hasn't
automatically denied everyone else.What this does is leaves those
teams that are really denied, still guessing and preparing for
something that isn't going to happen. If the system can
automatically accept the maximum allowed teams, and can identify
those teams that are incomplete or over the maximum allowed, why
can't it automatically deny everyone else?
Link on message: #4822253
trickster, on Jul 01 2013 - 10:11, said: Yes but you keep the submission dates secret or the last modified
date is the submission. If the last modified date is the submission
date then there is your proof. If you keep the submission date a
secret or unviewable then we have no way of proving that the system
is wrong. Make the submission date viewable by all to keep
everything above board. Other wise let everyone know who can get in
or can not get so we don't need to waste time trying to get players
interested in these type of events. Thank you very much for your
time in responding to this.Captain_Judo:
The submission date is not a secret. This is publicly accessible by modifying the search criteria in the registration.
Next time, go to the registration page and
1) under the "filter by status" dropdown, select "pending approval"
2) under the "sort by" dropdown, select "status change"
The system will then sort all teams that are pending approval based on the time they submitted their team for approval.
This and other useful information is contained in our FAQ.
The submission date is not a secret. This is publicly accessible by modifying the search criteria in the registration.
Next time, go to the registration page and
1) under the "filter by status" dropdown, select "pending approval"
2) under the "sort by" dropdown, select "status change"
The system will then sort all teams that are pending approval based on the time they submitted their team for approval.
This and other useful information is contained in our FAQ.
GenPanzer, on Jul 01 2013 - 12:42, said: I have "checked" your system once and it seemed to be working fine
as far as picking teams that submitted first. But, with that said,
I'd say your system is still somewhat "broken" as it hasn't
automatically denied everyone else.What this does is leaves those
teams that are really denied, still guessing and preparing for
something that isn't going to happen. If the system can
automatically accept the maximum allowed teams, and can identify
those teams that are incomplete or over the maximum allowed, why
can't it automatically deny everyone else?Captain_Judo:
We leave it open to allow for he possibility of a second, 64 team bracket. Follow the directions I posted above to see where your team stands in the queue and determine if you're likely accepted or not.
We leave it open to allow for he possibility of a second, 64 team bracket. Follow the directions I posted above to see where your team stands in the queue and determine if you're likely accepted or not.
Subject: Major League Championship Series, Summer 2013
Link on message: #4822148
Link on message: #4822148
Captain_Judo: After the maximum number of battles have passed, then it's just an
old fashioned draw. One point added to your overall season tally.
Subject: Major League Championship Series, Summer 2013
Link on message: #4822148
Link on message: #4822148
Captain_Judo: After the maximum number of battles have passed, then it's just an
old fashioned draw. One point added to your overall season tally.
Subject: Skirmish 25
Link on message: #4819706
CGS_Jackal, on Jul 01 2013 - 04:41, said: Skirmishes says first come first approved, but I see a lot of teams
pending approval and they submitted on the 28th and 29th.but I see
none of those teams accepted, but I see a bunch of teams accepted
that was submitted on the 30th.what gives? Wargaming not gonna
follow their own rules for skirmishes??? Are they just randomly
picking teams on the 30th??Just wondering because my team was
submitted by me on the 28th. and my team still has not been
accepted.If Wargaming doesn't want to follow their own rules, then
what is the point of particapating?Seems they just can't get their
act together anymore.
Link on message: #4819706
CGS_Jackal, on Jul 01 2013 - 04:41, said: Skirmishes says first come first approved, but I see a lot of teams
pending approval and they submitted on the 28th and 29th.but I see
none of those teams accepted, but I see a bunch of teams accepted
that was submitted on the 30th.what gives? Wargaming not gonna
follow their own rules for skirmishes??? Are they just randomly
picking teams on the 30th??Just wondering because my team was
submitted by me on the 28th. and my team still has not been
accepted.If Wargaming doesn't want to follow their own rules, then
what is the point of particapating?Seems they just can't get their
act together anymore.Captain_Judo: First come, first serve. Unless you can definitively provide
evidence that our system does this wrong, we take the first 64
teams that submit for approval.
Subject: Skirmish 25
Link on message: #4819706
CGS_Jackal, on Jul 01 2013 - 03:41, said: Skirmishes says first come first approved, but I see a lot of teams
pending approval and they submitted on the 28th and 29th.but I see
none of those teams accepted, but I see a bunch of teams accepted
that was submitted on the 30th.what gives? Wargaming not gonna
follow their own rules for skirmishes??? Are they just randomly
picking teams on the 30th??Just wondering because my team was
submitted by me on the 28th. and my team still has not been
accepted.If Wargaming doesn't want to follow their own rules, then
what is the point of particapating?Seems they just can't get their
act together anymore.
Link on message: #4819706
CGS_Jackal, on Jul 01 2013 - 03:41, said: Skirmishes says first come first approved, but I see a lot of teams
pending approval and they submitted on the 28th and 29th.but I see
none of those teams accepted, but I see a bunch of teams accepted
that was submitted on the 30th.what gives? Wargaming not gonna
follow their own rules for skirmishes??? Are they just randomly
picking teams on the 30th??Just wondering because my team was
submitted by me on the 28th. and my team still has not been
accepted.If Wargaming doesn't want to follow their own rules, then
what is the point of particapating?Seems they just can't get their
act together anymore.Captain_Judo:
First come, first serve. Unless you can definitively provide evidence that our system does this wrong, we take the first 64 teams that submit for approval.
First come, first serve. Unless you can definitively provide evidence that our system does this wrong, we take the first 64 teams that submit for approval.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4817333
DashMcBaycon, on Jun 30 2013 - 22:58, said: No, they are not terrible, but their valuation does leave something to be deisred. The closer the bundles come to $1 = 250 gold, the closer I am to purchasing them. I am looking forward to seeing what hits the store on the 4th, fingers crossed, some good bundles with some rare/not often seen tanks.
Link on message: #4817333
DashMcBaycon, on Jun 30 2013 - 22:58, said: No, they are not terrible, but their valuation does leave something to be deisred. The closer the bundles come to $1 = 250 gold, the closer I am to purchasing them. I am looking forward to seeing what hits the store on the 4th, fingers crossed, some good bundles with some rare/not often seen tanks.
GeneralDirection: The it's not was answering his question of whether or not this is
our plan for July 4th.
Subject: Join Clan Error
Link on message: #4816612
zachschaefs, on Jun 30 2013 - 23:04, said: So...I left my previous clan over 24 hours ago and it still
says
"Clan actions are blocked till 01.07.2013 14:10."
Plz help or tell me who can help.
Link on message: #4816612
zachschaefs, on Jun 30 2013 - 23:04, said: So...I left my previous clan over 24 hours ago and it still
says"Clan actions are blocked till 01.07.2013 14:10."
Plz help or tell me who can help.
Hypnotik: There is a minimum 48 hour cooldown before you may join another
clan. This helps to prevent "clan hopping". You will be free to
join a new clan on July 1 (tomorrow) at 2:10 PM.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4815972
brokensoldier, on Jun 30 2013 - 22:43, said: This goes to July 4.
I hope this isn't your big July 4 deal.
Terrible, WG.
Terrible.
Link on message: #4815972
brokensoldier, on Jun 30 2013 - 22:43, said: This goes to July 4.I hope this isn't your big July 4 deal.
Terrible, WG.
Terrible.
GeneralDirection: It's not.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4815972
brokensoldier, on Jun 30 2013 - 21:43, said: This goes to July 4.
I hope this isn't your big July 4 deal.
Terrible, WG.
Terrible.
Link on message: #4815972
brokensoldier, on Jun 30 2013 - 21:43, said: This goes to July 4.I hope this isn't your big July 4 deal.
Terrible, WG.
Terrible.
GeneralDirection:
It's not.
It's not.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4815972
brokensoldier, on Jun 30 2013 - 21:43, said: This goes to July 4.
I hope this isn't your big July 4 deal.
Terrible, WG.
Terrible.
Link on message: #4815972
brokensoldier, on Jun 30 2013 - 21:43, said: This goes to July 4.I hope this isn't your big July 4 deal.
Terrible, WG.
Terrible.
GeneralDirection:
It's not.
It's not.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4815972
brokensoldier, on Jun 30 2013 - 21:43, said: This goes to July 4.
I hope this isn't your big July 4 deal.
Terrible, WG.
Terrible.
Link on message: #4815972
brokensoldier, on Jun 30 2013 - 21:43, said: This goes to July 4.I hope this isn't your big July 4 deal.
Terrible, WG.
Terrible.
GeneralDirection:
It's not.
It's not.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4815964
Strongarm8, on Jun 30 2013 - 22:12, said: I would quite like these but... THIS IS THE FREAKIN 4TH OF
JULY!!!
If you don't have some special gift shop stuff on the 4th besides this that's just horrible
Link on message: #4815964
Strongarm8, on Jun 30 2013 - 22:12, said: I would quite like these but... THIS IS THE FREAKIN 4TH OF
JULY!!!If you don't have some special gift shop stuff on the 4th besides this that's just horrible
Major_Rampage: This gift shop ends early on the 4th. We will have a new
gift shop starting on the 4th of July, with some Holiday
specials to keep your eye out for.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4815964
Strongarm8, on Jun 30 2013 - 21:12, said: I would quite like these but... THIS IS THE FREAKIN 4TH OF
JULY!!!
If you don't have some special gift shop stuff on the 4th besides this that's just horrible
Link on message: #4815964
Strongarm8, on Jun 30 2013 - 21:12, said: I would quite like these but... THIS IS THE FREAKIN 4TH OF
JULY!!!If you don't have some special gift shop stuff on the 4th besides this that's just horrible
Major_Rampage:
This gift shop ends early on the 4th. We will have a new gift shop starting on the 4th of July, with some Holiday specials to keep your eye out for.
This gift shop ends early on the 4th. We will have a new gift shop starting on the 4th of July, with some Holiday specials to keep your eye out for.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4815852
enjineer, on Jun 30 2013 - 20:40, said: The Month Long Starter Bundle is about the worst thing you guys
have ever put together. 850 gold @ $4.99 = 170 gold per
dollar. Just put the 1250 gold for $6.95 in the gift
shop for the month. Honestly, I don't understand why you
don't just put all the gold buying options in the gift
shop. I would be much more inclined to send a friend a
$14.95 package rather than one of these terrible $5 "deals".
Link on message: #4815852
enjineer, on Jun 30 2013 - 20:40, said: The Month Long Starter Bundle is about the worst thing you guys
have ever put together. 850 gold @ $4.99 = 170 gold per
dollar. Just put the 1250 gold for $6.95 in the gift
shop for the month. Honestly, I don't understand why you
don't just put all the gold buying options in the gift
shop. I would be much more inclined to send a friend a
$14.95 package rather than one of these terrible $5 "deals".GeneralDirection: The month-long starter bundle was a player suggestion to give
something to spend leftover UGC money on, since the card cannot be
used with other payment options.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4815852
enjineer, on Jun 30 2013 - 19:40, said: The Month Long Starter Bundle is about the worst thing you guys
have ever put together. 850 gold @ $4.99 = 170 gold per
dollar. Just put the 1250 gold for $6.95 in the gift
shop for the month. Honestly, I don't understand why you
don't just put all the gold buying options in the gift
shop. I would be much more inclined to send a friend a
$14.95 package rather than one of these terrible $5 "deals".
Link on message: #4815852
enjineer, on Jun 30 2013 - 19:40, said: The Month Long Starter Bundle is about the worst thing you guys
have ever put together. 850 gold @ $4.99 = 170 gold per
dollar. Just put the 1250 gold for $6.95 in the gift
shop for the month. Honestly, I don't understand why you
don't just put all the gold buying options in the gift
shop. I would be much more inclined to send a friend a
$14.95 package rather than one of these terrible $5 "deals".GeneralDirection:
The month-long starter bundle was a player suggestion to give something to spend leftover UGC money on, since the card cannot be used with other payment options.
The month-long starter bundle was a player suggestion to give something to spend leftover UGC money on, since the card cannot be used with other payment options.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4815852
enjineer, on Jun 30 2013 - 19:40, said: The Month Long Starter Bundle is about the worst thing you guys
have ever put together. 850 gold @ $4.99 = 170 gold per
dollar. Just put the 1250 gold for $6.95 in the gift
shop for the month. Honestly, I don't understand why you
don't just put all the gold buying options in the gift
shop. I would be much more inclined to send a friend a
$14.95 package rather than one of these terrible $5 "deals".
Link on message: #4815852
enjineer, on Jun 30 2013 - 19:40, said: The Month Long Starter Bundle is about the worst thing you guys
have ever put together. 850 gold @ $4.99 = 170 gold per
dollar. Just put the 1250 gold for $6.95 in the gift
shop for the month. Honestly, I don't understand why you
don't just put all the gold buying options in the gift
shop. I would be much more inclined to send a friend a
$14.95 package rather than one of these terrible $5 "deals".GeneralDirection:
The month-long starter bundle was a player suggestion to give something to spend leftover UGC money on, since the card cannot be used with other payment options.
The month-long starter bundle was a player suggestion to give something to spend leftover UGC money on, since the card cannot be used with other payment options.
Subject: Gift Shop Bundles, July 1 to 4
Link on message: #4815852
enjineer, on Jun 30 2013 - 19:40, said: The Month Long Starter Bundle is about the worst thing you guys
have ever put together. 850 gold @ $4.99 = 170 gold per
dollar. Just put the 1250 gold for $6.95 in the gift
shop for the month. Honestly, I don't understand why you
don't just put all the gold buying options in the gift
shop. I would be much more inclined to send a friend a
$14.95 package rather than one of these terrible $5 "deals".
Link on message: #4815852
enjineer, on Jun 30 2013 - 19:40, said: The Month Long Starter Bundle is about the worst thing you guys
have ever put together. 850 gold @ $4.99 = 170 gold per
dollar. Just put the 1250 gold for $6.95 in the gift
shop for the month. Honestly, I don't understand why you
don't just put all the gold buying options in the gift
shop. I would be much more inclined to send a friend a
$14.95 package rather than one of these terrible $5 "deals".GeneralDirection:
The month-long starter bundle was a player suggestion to give something to spend leftover UGC money on, since the card cannot be used with other payment options.
The month-long starter bundle was a player suggestion to give something to spend leftover UGC money on, since the card cannot be used with other payment options.
Subject: RIP carbonward
Link on message: #4815313
Link on message: #4815313
Jewel_Thief: If you have a complaint about an action taken on our forums, please
follow official procedure and send a ticket into Support. However,
we cannot discuss actions taken on another user's account, per our
Privacy Policy.
Thanks folks,
~JT
Thanks folks,
~JT
Subject: Gift Gold to Your Clan
Link on message: #4815020
husband, on Jun 28 2013 - 03:04, said: thanks Hypnotic,
can you ask WGNA to make the small packages a permanent feature so we can utilize them when we need them not just within a 4-5 day window with little advance notice please? Thank you
holakc, on Jun 30 2013 - 01:46, said: then me bad for doing wrong asumptions
sorry :P
Link on message: #4815020
husband, on Jun 28 2013 - 03:04, said: thanks Hypnotic,can you ask WGNA to make the small packages a permanent feature so we can utilize them when we need them not just within a 4-5 day window with little advance notice please? Thank you
Hypnotik: Not a problem holakc. You guys might want to check out the current
specials, there are several low-cost ones available right now,
including a repeat of the one I previously mentioned and separate
one that will be lasting the whole month of July.
http://worldoftanks....les-july012013/
If you have any ideas for others packages you want to see available, feel free to let us know.
http://worldoftanks....les-july012013/
If you have any ideas for others packages you want to see available, feel free to let us know.
holakc, on Jun 30 2013 - 01:46, said: then me bad for doing wrong asumptionssorry :P
Hypnotik:
Subject: Reinstalled WoT after 6 months, but my forum account is reset?
Link on message: #4814353
Link on message: #4814353
Jewel_Thief: ... Are you sure you are on the right server? Your
account here isn't 6 months old... Perhaps you are thinking of the
EU, SEA, or RU server?
~JT
~JT
Subject: I just logged back in.
Link on message: #4814253
Link on message: #4814253
Jewel_Thief: Hey folks,
Servers are back up!!! Thanks so much for your patience.
Happy tanking!
~JT
PS: Always check our News Portal for updates on this stuff.
Servers are back up!!! Thanks so much for your patience.
Happy tanking!
~JT
PS: Always check our News Portal for updates on this stuff.
Subject: Servers are back online!
Link on message: #4814251
Link on message: #4814251
Jewel_Thief: Hey folks,
Servers are back up!!! Thanks so much for your patience.
Happy tanking!
~JT
PS: Always check our News Portal for updates on this stuff.
Servers are back up!!! Thanks so much for your patience.
Happy tanking!
~JT
PS: Always check our News Portal for updates on this stuff.
Subject: WarGaming's Way of Addressing the Recent Server Problem
Link on message: #4814186
Tequila_Shooter, on Jun 30 2013 - 18:34, said: "currently in the process of addressing these problems"
. Key Word "process" . Translation: We know the server
is down and we will take care of it some time Monday when we go
back to work. 
Link on message: #4814186
Tequila_Shooter, on Jun 30 2013 - 18:34, said: "currently in the process of addressing these problems"
. Key Word "process" . Translation: We know the server
is down and we will take care of it some time Monday when we go
back to work. Jewel_Thief: Actually, we took care of it within 30 minutes of reporting the
issue.... ... ...
We
have folks working 24/7...
Thanks for your patience, everyone!!
Happy tanking!
~JT
Thanks for your patience, everyone!!
Happy tanking!
~JT
Реклама | Adv















