Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: SU-76i pulled from gift shop
Link on message: #8082679
Tracker40, on Nov 06 2014 - 14:14, said: If this thing is OP as WG stated on FTR then they really have 2
choices here.
Link on message: #8082679
Tracker40, on Nov 06 2014 - 14:14, said: If this thing is OP as WG stated on FTR then they really have 2
choices here.Lert: 3) Pull a 'Type 59' on us. Keep it in the game as is and
reward it for rare missions / events every now and then, but don't
sell it again. 4) Pull a 'Pz II J' on us. Keep it in the game as
is, but don't give out new ones anymore.
Subject: SU-76i pulled from gift shop
Link on message: #8082583
worldeaters, on Nov 06 2014 - 13:53, said: So I snapped it up
Link on message: #8082583
worldeaters, on Nov 06 2014 - 13:53, said: So I snapped it upLert: How does that work, with you having that sig you have?
Subject: Does it pay to come back?
Link on message: #8082544
Link on message: #8082544
Lert: Depends on why you stopped playing in the first place.
Subject: SU-76i pulled from gift shop
Link on message: #8082498
Link on message: #8082498
Lert: I was given one by a friendly and very generous clanmate. Haven't
even driven it yet. Part of me wouldn't mind if they never brought
it back - that way I have a rare tank. I just hope they're not
going to nerf the crap out of it when they do bring it back.
Subject: Some thoughts on Tier 1, and a 7v7 MM dump
Link on message: #8082378
Link on message: #8082378
Lert: Are you suggesting something like - 7v7 for tiers 1 - 2 9v9
for tiers 3 - 4 12v12 for tiers 5 - 6 15v15 for tiers 7 - 10
Based on your thread and musings, I could see something like this
being a good thing. As you said, it'll help newer players
acclimatize, but it'll also give them something to work towards.
Subject: CC #39 - Guias Visuais - Tanques Pesados
Link on message: #8082295
Drackor, on Nov 06 2014 - 03:00, said: Capitão a forma que eu fiz esta de acordo com as regras? Ou tenho
que especificar o que esta errado e certo?
Link on message: #8082295
Drackor, on Nov 06 2014 - 03:00, said: Capitão a forma que eu fiz esta de acordo com as regras? Ou tenho
que especificar o que esta errado e certo?Capitao_Desastre_: tem de ter um exemplo certo e um errado, e como tal, tem de
especificar. Mas tem tempo, o concurso corre até dia 17.
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8082197
Link on message: #8082197
The_Chieftain: Going back a couple of pages to the subject of old floaty things,
did anyone catch The Admiral: Roaring Currents yet?
Subject: Would you support a latin american server?
Link on message: #8082136
DracoArgentum, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:29, said: Unless you can get tens of thousands of new players its a
terrible idea. Even NA West is barely viable, at off peak hours the
playerbase is too small. I'm in Australia and I play on NA East
even though its and extra 30-50ms ping over West because the MM
does not work that well with only 3k users. 250ms ping is
fine btw.
Link on message: #8082136
DracoArgentum, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:29, said: Unless you can get tens of thousands of new players its a
terrible idea. Even NA West is barely viable, at off peak hours the
playerbase is too small. I'm in Australia and I play on NA East
even though its and extra 30-50ms ping over West because the MM
does not work that well with only 3k users. 250ms ping is
fine btw.GeneralDirection: For sure. The idea behind opening a new server would be to
grow the playerbase significantly. While fixing ping for existing
players is important, we can't do that without a certain threshold
on the server (otherwise queue times are awful). We're going to
approach it with a very aggressive growth strategy in mind if we
can make it happen. That's the main reason it has taken this
long for a solution, though: on one hand you have latency, on the
other hand you have gameplay experience. It's kind of like the
chicken or the egg... which comes first? Not an easy nut to crack,
but we're trying to figure it out.
Subject: Would you support a latin american server?
Link on message: #8082136
DracoArgentum, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:29, said: Unless you can get tens of thousands of new players its a
terrible idea. Even NA West is barely viable, at off peak hours the
playerbase is too small. I'm in Australia and I play on NA East
even though its and extra 30-50ms ping over West because the MM
does not work that well with only 3k users. 250ms ping is
fine btw.
Link on message: #8082136
DracoArgentum, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:29, said: Unless you can get tens of thousands of new players its a
terrible idea. Even NA West is barely viable, at off peak hours the
playerbase is too small. I'm in Australia and I play on NA East
even though its and extra 30-50ms ping over West because the MM
does not work that well with only 3k users. 250ms ping is
fine btw.GeneralDirection: For sure. The idea behind opening a new server would be to
grow the playerbase significantly. While fixing ping for existing
players is important, we can't do that without a certain threshold
on the server (otherwise queue times are awful). We're going to
approach it with a very aggressive growth strategy in mind if we
can make it happen. That's the main reason it has taken this
long for a solution, though: on one hand you have latency, on the
other hand you have gameplay experience. It's kind of like the
chicken or the egg... which comes first? Not an easy nut to crack,
but we're trying to figure it out.
Subject: Would you support a latin american server?
Link on message: #8082136
DracoArgentum, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:29, said: Unless you can get tens of thousands of new players its a
terrible idea. Even NA West is barely viable, at off peak hours the
playerbase is too small. I'm in Australia and I play on NA East
even though its and extra 30-50ms ping over West because the MM
does not work that well with only 3k users. 250ms ping is
fine btw.
Link on message: #8082136
DracoArgentum, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:29, said: Unless you can get tens of thousands of new players its a
terrible idea. Even NA West is barely viable, at off peak hours the
playerbase is too small. I'm in Australia and I play on NA East
even though its and extra 30-50ms ping over West because the MM
does not work that well with only 3k users. 250ms ping is
fine btw.GeneralDirection: For sure. The idea behind opening a new server would be to
grow the playerbase significantly. While fixing ping for existing
players is important, we can't do that without a certain threshold
on the server (otherwise queue times are awful). We're going to
approach it with a very aggressive growth strategy in mind if we
can make it happen. That's the main reason it has taken this
long for a solution, though: on one hand you have latency, on the
other hand you have gameplay experience. It's kind of like the
chicken or the egg... which comes first? Not an easy nut to crack,
but we're trying to figure it out.
Subject: Would you support a latin american server?
Link on message: #8082136
DracoArgentum, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:29, said: Unless you can get tens of thousands of new players its a
terrible idea. Even NA West is barely viable, at off peak hours the
playerbase is too small. I'm in Australia and I play on NA East
even though its and extra 30-50ms ping over West because the MM
does not work that well with only 3k users. 250ms ping is
fine btw.
Link on message: #8082136
DracoArgentum, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:29, said: Unless you can get tens of thousands of new players its a
terrible idea. Even NA West is barely viable, at off peak hours the
playerbase is too small. I'm in Australia and I play on NA East
even though its and extra 30-50ms ping over West because the MM
does not work that well with only 3k users. 250ms ping is
fine btw.GeneralDirection: For sure. The idea behind opening a new server would be to
grow the playerbase significantly. While fixing ping for existing
players is important, we can't do that without a certain threshold
on the server (otherwise queue times are awful). We're going to
approach it with a very aggressive growth strategy in mind if we
can make it happen. That's the main reason it has taken this
long for a solution, though: on one hand you have latency, on the
other hand you have gameplay experience. It's kind of like the
chicken or the egg... which comes first? Not an easy nut to crack,
but we're trying to figure it out.
Subject: Proof of Russian Bias
Link on message: #8082124
TK3600, on Nov 06 2014 - 00:55, said: I remember how you left and Major Rampage gets trolled by everyone
for taking your spot, hehe. Things are doing fine, my stats are
still steadily raising despite my busier schedule. So, we will soon
have Latin American server?
xXxPhoenix_WrightxXx, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:02, said: Good to See GD back.
Link on message: #8082124
TK3600, on Nov 06 2014 - 00:55, said: I remember how you left and Major Rampage gets trolled by everyone
for taking your spot, hehe. Things are doing fine, my stats are
still steadily raising despite my busier schedule. So, we will soon
have Latin American server?GeneralDirection: Well, I think Rampage is doing a great job personally. It's
hard to please everyone with all events and still retain some
semblance of balance. Good to hear on the improvements; I always
say more battles == more knowledge, even if you have a tough time
on a given day. Regarding a LA server; I can't say right
now. We definitely need to fix latency for the folks playing from
Latin America (it's really bad; trust me), but there are a lot
of challenges in opening a new server--particularly on the network
side of things.
xXxPhoenix_WrightxXx, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:02, said: Good to See GD back. GeneralDirection: Thanks! I never really left, just retreated to a "cave" to
get things in order. :)
You'll mostly see me involved in discussions about Latin America, but I might pop in from time to time in other threads to discuss my favorite tanks, maps, etc. I still play the game (albeit not as much as I'd have liked to recently), so my #1 priority there is to be active when I can.
Just don't look to me as the first source for game changes. ;)
You'll mostly see me involved in discussions about Latin America, but I might pop in from time to time in other threads to discuss my favorite tanks, maps, etc. I still play the game (albeit not as much as I'd have liked to recently), so my #1 priority there is to be active when I can.
Just don't look to me as the first source for game changes. ;)
Subject: Proof of Russian Bias
Link on message: #8082061
TK3600, on Nov 06 2014 - 00:41, said: Wow, even General Direction has joined the discussion! How have you
been? We missing you so much!!!
Link on message: #8082061
TK3600, on Nov 06 2014 - 00:41, said: Wow, even General Direction has joined the discussion! How have you
been? We missing you so much!!!GeneralDirection: I'm doing OK. Latin America is actually my responsibility
right now, hence feeling stupid. :) Currently working on
plans to expand our products into the region. How are things
going for you?
Subject: Would you support a latin american server?
Link on message: #8082056
Link on message: #8082056
GeneralDirection: We are looking into it. I don't have any further details, but
improving connection quality for our Latin American players is a
very high priority for Wargaming. I've personally done a lot
of research on the subject, and it's my primary focus right now.
Subject: Would you support a latin american server?
Link on message: #8082056
Link on message: #8082056
GeneralDirection: We are looking into it. I don't have any further details, but
improving connection quality for our Latin American players is a
very high priority for Wargaming. I've personally done a lot
of research on the subject, and it's my primary focus right now.
Subject: Would you support a latin american server?
Link on message: #8082056
Link on message: #8082056
GeneralDirection: We are looking into it. I don't have any further details, but
improving connection quality for our Latin American players is a
very high priority for Wargaming. I've personally done a lot
of research on the subject, and it's my primary focus right now.
Subject: Would you support a latin american server?
Link on message: #8082056
Link on message: #8082056
GeneralDirection: We are looking into it. I don't have any further details, but
improving connection quality for our Latin American players is a
very high priority for Wargaming. I've personally done a lot
of research on the subject, and it's my primary focus right now.
Subject: South American Server
Link on message: #8082053
Pirate_with_rum, on Oct 15 2014 - 18:17, said: Its actually being considered.
Link on message: #8082053
Pirate_with_rum, on Oct 15 2014 - 18:17, said: Its actually being considered. GeneralDirection: This. I have no information on when or what it means for
existing players yet, but we're looking into it. I
apologize for not responding earlier. This is very important
to us and it deserves a more timely response.
Subject: South American Server
Link on message: #8082053
Pirate_with_rum, on Oct 15 2014 - 18:17, said: Its actually being considered.
Link on message: #8082053
Pirate_with_rum, on Oct 15 2014 - 18:17, said: Its actually being considered. GeneralDirection: This. I have no information on when or what it means for
existing players yet, but we're looking into it. I
apologize for not responding earlier. This is very important
to us and it deserves a more timely response.
Subject: South American Server
Link on message: #8082053
Pirate_with_rum, on Oct 15 2014 - 18:17, said: Its actually being considered.
Link on message: #8082053
Pirate_with_rum, on Oct 15 2014 - 18:17, said: Its actually being considered. GeneralDirection: This. I have no information on when or what it means for
existing players yet, but we're looking into it. I
apologize for not responding earlier. This is very important
to us and it deserves a more timely response.
Subject: South American Server
Link on message: #8082053
Pirate_with_rum, on Oct 15 2014 - 18:17, said: Its actually being considered.
Link on message: #8082053
Pirate_with_rum, on Oct 15 2014 - 18:17, said: Its actually being considered. GeneralDirection: This. I have no information on when or what it means for
existing players yet, but we're looking into it. I
apologize for not responding earlier. This is very important
to us and it deserves a more timely response.
Subject: Proof of Russian Bias
Link on message: #8082021
Final_Spark, on Nov 06 2014 - 00:13, said:
http://ed101.bu.edu/StudentDoc/Archives/ED101sp09/amwoog/Continent.html
He speaks the truth.
Link on message: #8082021
Final_Spark, on Nov 06 2014 - 00:13, said:
http://ed101.bu.edu/StudentDoc/Archives/ED101sp09/amwoog/Continent.html
He speaks the truth.GeneralDirection: Right, Mexico is part of North America when you're talking
continents. I was referring more to cultural regions, and should
have said Latin America--not Central. It's kind of late, but
I feel stupid for the slipup and have no problem admitting that.
Subject: The All "New" AT-15A
Link on message: #8082005
Link on message: #8082005
GeneralDirection: Hmm, time to take this out for a spin! Thanks for the quick review
of its changes. :)
Subject: The All "New" AT-15A
Link on message: #8082005
Link on message: #8082005
GeneralDirection: Hmm, time to take this out for a spin! Thanks for the quick review
of its changes. :)
Subject: The All "New" AT-15A
Link on message: #8082005
Link on message: #8082005
GeneralDirection: Hmm, time to take this out for a spin! Thanks for the quick review
of its changes. :)
Subject: The All "New" AT-15A
Link on message: #8082005
Link on message: #8082005
GeneralDirection: Hmm, time to take this out for a spin! Thanks for the quick review
of its changes. :)
Subject: Stalingrad- your thoughts
Link on message: #8082001
Link on message: #8082001
GeneralDirection: Played on it once today in my T-54... Kept glancing at the minimap
and thinking "OK, time to cut to the base," and nope, it was still
a good ways away. I didn't get a chance to play it on test, so the
size definitely caught me by surprise.
Very big map, with lots of rubble in unsuspecting places. This is going to be an interesting map once client physics are in.
Very big map, with lots of rubble in unsuspecting places. This is going to be an interesting map once client physics are in.
Subject: Stalingrad- your thoughts
Link on message: #8082001
Link on message: #8082001
GeneralDirection: Played on it once today in my T-54... Kept glancing at the minimap
and thinking "OK, time to cut to the base," and nope, it was still
a good ways away. I didn't get a chance to play it on test, so the
size definitely caught me by surprise.
Very big map, with lots of rubble in unsuspecting places. This is going to be an interesting map once client physics are in.
Very big map, with lots of rubble in unsuspecting places. This is going to be an interesting map once client physics are in.
Subject: Stalingrad- your thoughts
Link on message: #8082001
Link on message: #8082001
GeneralDirection: Played on it once today in my T-54... Kept glancing at the minimap
and thinking "OK, time to cut to the base," and nope, it was still
a good ways away. I didn't get a chance to play it on test, so the
size definitely caught me by surprise.
Very big map, with lots of rubble in unsuspecting places. This is going to be an interesting map once client physics are in.
Very big map, with lots of rubble in unsuspecting places. This is going to be an interesting map once client physics are in.
Subject: Stalingrad- your thoughts
Link on message: #8082001
Link on message: #8082001
GeneralDirection: Played on it once today in my T-54... Kept glancing at the minimap
and thinking "OK, time to cut to the base," and nope, it was still
a good ways away. I didn't get a chance to play it on test, so the
size definitely caught me by surprise.
Very big map, with lots of rubble in unsuspecting places. This is going to be an interesting map once client physics are in.
Very big map, with lots of rubble in unsuspecting places. This is going to be an interesting map once client physics are in.
Subject: Proof of Russian Bias
Link on message: #8081995
FlorbFnarb, on Nov 05 2014 - 23:01, said: Mexico is North America, not Central America.
Link on message: #8081995
FlorbFnarb, on Nov 05 2014 - 23:01, said: Mexico is North America, not Central America.GeneralDirection: It depends entirely on how you define the geography. Both
are technically correct.
Subject: IOC_6 non troll recruitment thread
Link on message: #8081023
Link on message: #8081023
Lert: You know, that mission statement actually makes you sound like
decent folk. Have my blessing, for whatever that's worth.
Subject: Help me pick!
Link on message: #8080868
Link on message: #8080868
Lert: Welp, nevermind. I fell victim to
this. I'll keep this thread in mind though next time 1k
gold falls into my lap and I'll get the S35. That seems to be the
favored tonk of the masses.
Subject: another campaign for the big cheater clans
Link on message: #8080322
HOTA_CHATON, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:23, said: None of the upstart clans every get awarded
Link on message: #8080322
HOTA_CHATON, on Nov 06 2014 - 01:23, said: None of the upstart clans every get awardedLert: Just like mediocre runners in the olympics. Do you not
understand the concept of 'prizes'? They are usually won, by people
who are better than you at doing the thing the prize is for.
Subject: another campaign for the big cheater clans
Link on message: #8080109
Link on message: #8080109
Lert: Entertainment value?
Subject: La Versión 9.4 Está en Camino
Link on message: #8079761
CORTEXE, on Nov 05 2014 - 06:45, said: Corrige lo que escribes que 684 Gb ...... xddd
Link on message: #8079761
CORTEXE, on Nov 05 2014 - 06:45, said: Corrige lo que escribes que 684 Gb ...... xdddElPozoleOlmeca: díos mio.......mitad de TB
Subject: La Versión 9.4 Está en Camino
Link on message: #8079761
CORTEXE, on Nov 05 2014 - 06:45, said: Corrige lo que escribes que 684 Gb ...... xddd
Link on message: #8079761
CORTEXE, on Nov 05 2014 - 06:45, said: Corrige lo que escribes que 684 Gb ...... xdddPollotheDestroyer: díos mio.......mitad de TB
Subject: La Versión 9.4 Está en Camino
Link on message: #8079761
CORTEXE, on Nov 05 2014 - 06:45, said: Corrige lo que escribes que 684 Gb ...... xddd
Link on message: #8079761
CORTEXE, on Nov 05 2014 - 06:45, said: Corrige lo que escribes que 684 Gb ...... xdddApolloArtemis: díos mio.......mitad de TB
Subject: Overwolf esta dando 1000 de oro
Link on message: #8079758
Ruba_tanque, on Nov 05 2014 - 15:22, said: yo sabia malisima la promoción
http://ftr.wot-news....-1000-gold-eu/ aca las quejas y
de la 9.4 capaz que ahi hay problemas con los 1000 de oro tambien.
Link on message: #8079758
Ruba_tanque, on Nov 05 2014 - 15:22, said: yo sabia malisima la promoción ElPozoleOlmeca: 1000 oro de a gratis no me parece tan mala promoción.
Subject: Overwolf esta dando 1000 de oro
Link on message: #8079758
Ruba_tanque, on Nov 05 2014 - 15:22, said: yo sabia malisima la promoción
http://ftr.wot-news....-1000-gold-eu/
aca las quejas y de la 9.4 capaz que ahi hay problemas con los 1000
de oro tambien.
Link on message: #8079758
Ruba_tanque, on Nov 05 2014 - 15:22, said: yo sabia malisima la promoción PollotheDestroyer: 1000 oro de a gratis no me parece tan mala promoción.
Реклама | Adv















