Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: 15x Crew training on first win?
Link on message: #4184874
IndygoEEI, on Apr 12 2013 - 11:03, said: Not bad. Add in the Mentor perk and you'll rack in some
percentage
points or at least one on the 4th skill and above for the crew.
Link on message: #4184874
IndygoEEI, on Apr 12 2013 - 11:03, said: Not bad. Add in the Mentor perk and you'll rack in some
percentagepoints or at least one on the 4th skill and above for the crew.
GeneralDirection:
Hmm, who let you behind our closed doors? Have you been peeking at our whiteboard again?!
But to be clear, there's no 15x crew experience bonus for first victory this weekend.
Hmm, who let you behind our closed doors? Have you been peeking at our whiteboard again?!
But to be clear, there's no 15x crew experience bonus for first victory this weekend.
Subject: 15x Crew training on first win?
Link on message: #4184874
IndygoEEI, on Apr 12 2013 - 11:03, said: Not bad. Add in the Mentor perk and you'll rack in some
percentage
points or at least one on the 4th skill and above for the crew.
Link on message: #4184874
IndygoEEI, on Apr 12 2013 - 11:03, said: Not bad. Add in the Mentor perk and you'll rack in some
percentagepoints or at least one on the 4th skill and above for the crew.
GeneralDirection:
Hmm, who let you behind our closed doors? Have you been peeking at our whiteboard again?!
But to be clear, there's no 15x crew experience bonus for first victory this weekend.
Hmm, who let you behind our closed doors? Have you been peeking at our whiteboard again?!
But to be clear, there's no 15x crew experience bonus for first victory this weekend.
Subject: 15x Crew training on first win?
Link on message: #4184874
IndygoEEI, on Apr 12 2013 - 11:03, said: Not bad. Add in the Mentor perk and you'll rack in some
percentage
points or at least one on the 4th skill and above for the crew.
Link on message: #4184874
IndygoEEI, on Apr 12 2013 - 11:03, said: Not bad. Add in the Mentor perk and you'll rack in some
percentagepoints or at least one on the 4th skill and above for the crew.
GeneralDirection:
Hmm, who let you behind our closed doors? Have you been peeking at our whiteboard again?!
But to be clear, there's no 15x crew experience bonus for first victory this weekend.
Hmm, who let you behind our closed doors? Have you been peeking at our whiteboard again?!
But to be clear, there's no 15x crew experience bonus for first victory this weekend.
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4184701
Link on message: #4184701
GeneralDirection: Hey folks.
To explain the IS-6 removal, it was to fix the price back to the $41.09 that we originally announced. Changing it after announcing the price is bad. We learned that lesson already and did not want to repeat it.
To explain the IS-6 removal, it was to fix the price back to the $41.09 that we originally announced. Changing it after announcing the price is bad. We learned that lesson already and did not want to repeat it.
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4184701
Link on message: #4184701
GeneralDirection: Hey folks.
To explain the IS-6 removal, it was to fix the price back to the $41.09 that we originally announced. Changing it after announcing the price is bad. We learned that lesson already and did not want to repeat it.
To explain the IS-6 removal, it was to fix the price back to the $41.09 that we originally announced. Changing it after announcing the price is bad. We learned that lesson already and did not want to repeat it.
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4184701
Link on message: #4184701
GeneralDirection: Hey folks.
To explain the IS-6 removal, it was to fix the price back to the $41.09 that we originally announced. Changing it after announcing the price is bad. We learned that lesson already and did not want to repeat it.
To explain the IS-6 removal, it was to fix the price back to the $41.09 that we originally announced. Changing it after announcing the price is bad. We learned that lesson already and did not want to repeat it.
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4184701
Link on message: #4184701
GeneralDirection: Hey folks.
To explain the IS-6 removal, it was to fix the price back to the $41.09 that we originally announced. Changing it after announcing the price is bad. We learned that lesson already and did not want to repeat it.
To explain the IS-6 removal, it was to fix the price back to the $41.09 that we originally announced. Changing it after announcing the price is bad. We learned that lesson already and did not want to repeat it.
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4184259
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 08:07, said: Well i am not buying nothing they made me wait too long
Link on message: #4184259
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 08:07, said: Well i am not buying nothing they made me wait too long
Major_Rampage: I am sorry, that the gift shop open right when it said
it was going to...?
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4184259
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 07:07, said: Well i am not buying nothing they made me wait too long
Link on message: #4184259
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 07:07, said: Well i am not buying nothing they made me wait too longMajor_Rampage:
I am sorry, that the gift shop open right when it said it was going to...?
I am sorry, that the gift shop open right when it said it was going to...?
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4184259
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 07:07, said: Well i am not buying nothing they made me wait too long
Link on message: #4184259
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 07:07, said: Well i am not buying nothing they made me wait too longMajor_Rampage:
I am sorry, that the gift shop open right when it said it was going to...?
I am sorry, that the gift shop open right when it said it was going to...?
Subject: World of Tanks 2nd Anniversary Fracas - Tier 8
Link on message: #4184132
Canaduck, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:49, said: Is the tier 8 tournament having the mode changed to standard on day
1 as well, or is the rotation changed on both but standard is only
on tier 6?
Link on message: #4184132
Canaduck, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:49, said: Is the tier 8 tournament having the mode changed to standard on day
1 as well, or is the rotation changed on both but standard is only
on tier 6?lord_farquad: Just the map rotation. The only one with a mode issue was the tier
6.
Subject: World of Tanks 2nd Anniversary Fracas - Tier 8
Link on message: #4184132
Canaduck, on Apr 12 2013 - 05:49, said: Is the tier 8 tournament having the mode changed to standard on day
1 as well, or is the rotation changed on both but standard is only
on tier 6?
Link on message: #4184132
Canaduck, on Apr 12 2013 - 05:49, said: Is the tier 8 tournament having the mode changed to standard on day
1 as well, or is the rotation changed on both but standard is only
on tier 6?lord_farquad: Just the map rotation. The only one with a mode issue was the tier
6.
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4184113
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 07:26, said: Well my patience has run out they just lost a customer in future do as they say not make people wait.
Link on message: #4184113
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 07:26, said: Well my patience has run out they just lost a customer in future do as they say not make people wait.
Major_Rampage: Giftshop should be up in about 30 minutes according to the news
article.
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4184113
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:26, said: Well my patience has run out they just lost a customer in future do
as they say not make people wait.
Link on message: #4184113
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:26, said: Well my patience has run out they just lost a customer in future do
as they say not make people wait.Major_Rampage:
Giftshop should be up in about 30 minutes according to the news article.
Giftshop should be up in about 30 minutes according to the news article.
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4184113
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:26, said: Well my patience has run out they just lost a customer in future do
as they say not make people wait.
Link on message: #4184113
Imperial_Sturmtruppen, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:26, said: Well my patience has run out they just lost a customer in future do
as they say not make people wait.Major_Rampage:
Giftshop should be up in about 30 minutes according to the news article.
Giftshop should be up in about 30 minutes according to the news article.
Subject: World of Tanks 2nd Anniversary Fracas - Tier 8
Link on message: #4183810
Link on message: #4183810
lord_farquad: Please note that due to a technical issue, the map order has been
changed!
Subject: World of Tanks 2nd Anniversary Fracas - Tier 8
Link on message: #4183810
Link on message: #4183810
lord_farquad: Please note that due to a technical issue, the map order has been
changed!
Subject: Will the Type59 be available to purchase again?
Link on message: #4183795
apollokenney, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:10, said: Notice the KV5 and Type 62 on there. Go to the home page and click
on gift shop offers. Prepare to be amazed :P
Dregdon, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:11, said: Thats a great post except for the fact that they had "no plans" to
put the type 62 and KV-5 in the gift shop and made it an ASTOUNDING
one and a half months and there they are in the gift shop.
D_X_T, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:14, said: That list includes kv5 and the Type62 aswell,
Which ARE currently purchaseable, so I dont think T59 wont ever return back.
It WILL!
Some day, some day! Iknow u r coming back down! Tehehe.
Link on message: #4183795
apollokenney, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:10, said: Notice the KV5 and Type 62 on there. Go to the home page and click
on gift shop offers. Prepare to be amazed :Pdance210: Yep, and when it was written there were no plans. The KV-5 and Type
62 being available now means that while they may not have had any
plans AT THAT TIME, the tanks MAY still be in the gift shop. OP
asked if the Type 59 would be returned to the gift shop; the answer
is not at this point in time.
Dregdon, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:11, said: Thats a great post except for the fact that they had "no plans" to
put the type 62 and KV-5 in the gift shop and made it an ASTOUNDING
one and a half months and there they are in the gift shop.dance210:
D_X_T, on Apr 12 2013 - 06:14, said: That list includes kv5 and the Type62 aswell,Which ARE currently purchaseable, so I dont think T59 wont ever return back.
It WILL!
Some day, some day! Iknow u r coming back down! Tehehe.
dance210:
Subject: World of Tanks 2nd Anniversary Fracas - Tier 6
Link on message: #4183789
Link on message: #4183789
lord_farquad: Please note that due to a technical issue, the STANDARD battle mode
will now be used for the first stage of this tournament, and the
map order has been changed.
Subject: World of Tanks 2nd Anniversary Fracas - Tier 6
Link on message: #4183789
Link on message: #4183789
lord_farquad: Please note that due to a technical issue, the STANDARD battle mode
will now be used for the first stage of this tournament, and the
map order has been changed.
Subject: Will the Type59 be available to purchase again?
Link on message: #4183655
Link on message: #4183655
dance210: Try checking out this threadfor your answer
Subject: Party for Two: MVP Event
Link on message: #4182104
Praetor77, on Apr 12 2013 - 01:08, said: Weird rules.
XP calculation is not clear. Is it XP for both players for both matches? F ex. 1000+1000+1250+1250 =4500?
And is the entry valid for both players? Does it count as a sumbission for both players?
Link on message: #4182104
Praetor77, on Apr 12 2013 - 01:08, said: Weird rules.
XP calculation is not clear. Is it XP for both players for both matches? F ex. 1000+1000+1250+1250 =4500?
And is the entry valid for both players? Does it count as a sumbission for both players?
Major_Rampage: you indeed add the exp for both players in both
games.
One entry is indeed valid for both people.
One entry is indeed valid for both people.
Subject: Party for Two: MVP Event
Link on message: #4182104
Praetor77, on Apr 12 2013 - 00:08, said: Weird rules.
XP calculation is not clear. Is it XP for both players for both matches? F ex. 1000+1000+1250+1250 =4500?
And is the entry valid for both players? Does it count as a sumbission for both players?
Link on message: #4182104
Praetor77, on Apr 12 2013 - 00:08, said: Weird rules.XP calculation is not clear. Is it XP for both players for both matches? F ex. 1000+1000+1250+1250 =4500?
And is the entry valid for both players? Does it count as a sumbission for both players?
Major_Rampage:
you indeed add the exp for both players in both games.
One entry is indeed valid for both people.
you indeed add the exp for both players in both games.
One entry is indeed valid for both people.
Subject: Party for Two: MVP Event
Link on message: #4182104
Praetor77, on Apr 12 2013 - 00:08, said: Weird rules.
XP calculation is not clear. Is it XP for both players for both matches? F ex. 1000+1000+1250+1250 =4500?
And is the entry valid for both players? Does it count as a sumbission for both players?
Link on message: #4182104
Praetor77, on Apr 12 2013 - 00:08, said: Weird rules.XP calculation is not clear. Is it XP for both players for both matches? F ex. 1000+1000+1250+1250 =4500?
And is the entry valid for both players? Does it count as a sumbission for both players?
Major_Rampage:
you indeed add the exp for both players in both games.
One entry is indeed valid for both people.
you indeed add the exp for both players in both games.
One entry is indeed valid for both people.
CatStalker
Submit your replays for a chance to be included in a future official video!
12.04.2013 02:53:41
Subject: Submit your replays for a chance to be included in a future official video!
Link on message: #4181930
Link on message: #4181930
CatStalker: Tankers!
We're looking to gather some new replays to be used in an upcoming 'RNG' video!
You can find our previous videos here to get a taste of what we're looking for:
Requirements:Main point. All replays should obey to great RNG. In other words, the things passing on the screen should depend more on situation, and not on the skill of the replay submitter (random, silly actions of allies or enemies etc.)
When submitting a replay to this thread it's important to describe the situation you want us to add to the video. Pretend that you are a film director and tell us your vision!
All activities on screen should make a person laugh, and not create any frustration. That means no griefing!
It's really important to add the timing of the moment after description. For example, "funny jump over 2 vehicles at 11.40-11.20 of the battle timer"
No more than 2 replays from one player should be submitted for each video
Only replays selected by video engineers will enter the final composition
Please, follow the template below when submitting the replay. Otherwise post will be just deleted as off-topic. Only replay submissions should be added to this thread.
1. Link to the uploaded replay to http://mwreplays.com/
2. Description of the moment
3. Timing
Rewards:
1. Player, who sent a replay, which finished in the final video composition receives:
2. First sender is considered the owner of the replay
3. Nicknames of the players, who submitted the replay, will be listed in credits
Theme of the next video:
Flight of LT or MT, which ended without suspension break

FAQ:
Q: Do replays from previous versions of WoT count?
A: Please limit submitted replays to those recorded in the 8.4 client.
We're looking to gather some new replays to be used in an upcoming 'RNG' video!
You can find our previous videos here to get a taste of what we're looking for:
Requirements:Main point. All replays should obey to great RNG. In other words, the things passing on the screen should depend more on situation, and not on the skill of the replay submitter (random, silly actions of allies or enemies etc.)
When submitting a replay to this thread it's important to describe the situation you want us to add to the video. Pretend that you are a film director and tell us your vision!
All activities on screen should make a person laugh, and not create any frustration. That means no griefing!
It's really important to add the timing of the moment after description. For example, "funny jump over 2 vehicles at 11.40-11.20 of the battle timer"
No more than 2 replays from one player should be submitted for each video
Only replays selected by video engineers will enter the final composition
Please, follow the template below when submitting the replay. Otherwise post will be just deleted as off-topic. Only replay submissions should be added to this thread.
1. Link to the uploaded replay to http://mwreplays.com/
2. Description of the moment
3. Timing
Rewards:
1. Player, who sent a replay, which finished in the final video composition receives:
2. First sender is considered the owner of the replay
3. Nicknames of the players, who submitted the replay, will be listed in credits
Theme of the next video:
Flight of LT or MT, which ended without suspension break

FAQ:
Q: Do replays from previous versions of WoT count?
A: Please limit submitted replays to those recorded in the 8.4 client.
Subject: *CLEAN* Tank Limerick Contest Discussion Thread
Link on message: #4181606
Link on message: #4181606
Major_Rampage: The finalists have posted
The Major is ready to be roasted
As happens with all creative contests
Opinions always digress
I prefer my hamburger buns toasted.
(yeah I had no way to end that one)
Vote here: http://forum.worldof...test-finalists/
The Major is ready to be roasted
As happens with all creative contests
Opinions always digress
I prefer my hamburger buns toasted.
(yeah I had no way to end that one)
Vote here: http://forum.worldof...test-finalists/
Subject: *CLEAN* Tank Limerick Contest Discussion Thread
Link on message: #4181606
Link on message: #4181606
Major_Rampage: The finalists have posted
The Major is ready to be roasted
As happens with all creative contests
Opinions always digress
I prefer my hamburger buns toasted.
(yeah I had no way to end that one)
Vote here: http://forum.worldof...test-finalists/
The Major is ready to be roasted
As happens with all creative contests
Opinions always digress
I prefer my hamburger buns toasted.
(yeah I had no way to end that one)
Vote here: http://forum.worldof...test-finalists/
Subject: *CLEAN* Tank Limerick Contest Discussion Thread
Link on message: #4181606
Link on message: #4181606
Major_Rampage: The finalists have posted
The Major is ready to be roasted
As happens with all creative contests
Opinions always digress
I prefer my hamburger buns toasted.
(yeah I had no way to end that one)
Vote here: http://forum.worldof...test-finalists/
The Major is ready to be roasted
As happens with all creative contests
Opinions always digress
I prefer my hamburger buns toasted.
(yeah I had no way to end that one)
Vote here: http://forum.worldof...test-finalists/
Subject: *CLEAN* Tank Limerick Contest Discussion Thread
Link on message: #4181119
Link on message: #4181119
Major_Rampage: Rampage has just finished round one
One more pass is yet to be done
Many of the entries many were great
But to be finalists was not everyone fate
When winners are announced I will still be shunned.
One more pass is yet to be done
Many of the entries many were great
But to be finalists was not everyone fate
When winners are announced I will still be shunned.
Subject: *CLEAN* Tank Limerick Contest Discussion Thread
Link on message: #4181119
Link on message: #4181119
Major_Rampage: Rampage has just finished round one
One more pass is yet to be done
Many of the entries many were great
But to be finalists was not everyone fate
When winners are announced I will still be shunned.
One more pass is yet to be done
Many of the entries many were great
But to be finalists was not everyone fate
When winners are announced I will still be shunned.
Subject: *CLEAN* Tank Limerick Contest Discussion Thread
Link on message: #4181119
Link on message: #4181119
Major_Rampage: Rampage has just finished round one
One more pass is yet to be done
Many of the entries many were great
But to be finalists was not everyone fate
When winners are announced I will still be shunned.
One more pass is yet to be done
Many of the entries many were great
But to be finalists was not everyone fate
When winners are announced I will still be shunned.
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4180854
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 17:02, said: Super P bundle's price changed ? wtf ? 
1SLUGGO1, on Apr 11 2013 - 17:06, said: prices are always subject to change.
Unknown0ne, on Apr 11 2013 - 17:07, said: It didn't? It's the same as it was when I posted this, which was around a day ago.
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 17:09, said: i were happy that i can buy super p , but now i wont spend a 0.1$
on WOT ! GG
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 17:10, said: 24.99$
Link on message: #4180854
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 17:02, said: Super P bundle's price changed ? wtf ? Major_Rampage: That has been the price has been $28.99 since we put up the
article.
1SLUGGO1, on Apr 11 2013 - 17:06, said: prices are always subject to change.Major_Rampage:
Unknown0ne, on Apr 11 2013 - 17:07, said: It didn't? It's the same as it was when I posted this, which was around a day ago.Major_Rampage:
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 17:09, said: i were happy that i can buy super p , but now i wont spend a 0.1$
on WOT ! GGMajor_Rampage:
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 17:10, said: 24.99$Major_Rampage:
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4180854
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:02, said: Super P bundle's price changed ? wtf ? 
1SLUGGO1, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:06, said: prices are always subject to change.
Unknown0ne, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:07, said: It didn't? It's the same as it was when I posted this, which was around a day ago.
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:09, said: i were happy that i can buy super p , but now i wont spend a 0.1$
on WOT ! GG
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:10, said: 24.99$
Link on message: #4180854
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:02, said: Super P bundle's price changed ? wtf ? Major_Rampage:
That has been the price has been $28.99 since we put up the article.
That has been the price has been $28.99 since we put up the article.
1SLUGGO1, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:06, said: prices are always subject to change.Major_Rampage:
Unknown0ne, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:07, said: It didn't? It's the same as it was when I posted this, which was around a day ago.Major_Rampage:
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:09, said: i were happy that i can buy super p , but now i wont spend a 0.1$
on WOT ! GGMajor_Rampage:
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:10, said: 24.99$Major_Rampage:
Subject: 2nd Anniversary Gift Shop Bundles
Link on message: #4180854
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:02, said: Super P bundle's price changed ? wtf ? 
1SLUGGO1, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:06, said: prices are always subject to change.
Unknown0ne, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:07, said: It didn't? It's the same as it was when I posted this, which was around a day ago.
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:09, said: i were happy that i can buy super p , but now i wont spend a 0.1$
on WOT ! GG
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:10, said: 24.99$
Link on message: #4180854
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:02, said: Super P bundle's price changed ? wtf ? Major_Rampage:
That has been the price has been $28.99 since we put up the article.
That has been the price has been $28.99 since we put up the article.
1SLUGGO1, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:06, said: prices are always subject to change.Major_Rampage:
Unknown0ne, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:07, said: It didn't? It's the same as it was when I posted this, which was around a day ago.Major_Rampage:
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:09, said: i were happy that i can buy super p , but now i wont spend a 0.1$
on WOT ! GGMajor_Rampage:
EsiX, on Apr 11 2013 - 16:10, said: 24.99$Major_Rampage:
Subject: Party for Two: MVP Event
Link on message: #4180712
Allurai, on Apr 11 2013 - 22:44, said: That's my point though, its one entry per person, and all 4
screenshots in 1 entry.
Person C can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person B can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A can submit his entry, with Person X as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A was in 3 entries, but still only 1 entry per person has been submitted.
I don't see how the situation above, and the situation I posted in bold a few posts ago violates this rule from MR. I would like him to confirm one way or the other though.
Verilogus, on Apr 11 2013 - 23:01, said: Trust WG to come up with something convoluted, not explain it
adequately and provide a useless example.
What does this even mean?
You and your platoonmate will have 4 screenshots, which 2 to send, that nonsensical sentence implies your friend needs to send you his screenshot so you can include it in your email along with your first one and DISREGARD your second one? And what should that friend send in turn? The other 2 games?
Why can't WG ever give clear instructions rather than concepts delivered from an addled mind incapable of parsing its nonsense into concise English.
Link on message: #4180712
Allurai, on Apr 11 2013 - 22:44, said: That's my point though, its one entry per person, and all 4
screenshots in 1 entry.Person C can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person B can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A can submit his entry, with Person X as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A was in 3 entries, but still only 1 entry per person has been submitted.
I don't see how the situation above, and the situation I posted in bold a few posts ago violates this rule from MR. I would like him to confirm one way or the other though.
Major_Rampage: No one player can be entered more then once.
Verilogus, on Apr 11 2013 - 23:01, said: Trust WG to come up with something convoluted, not explain it
adequately and provide a useless example.What does this even mean?
You and your platoonmate will have 4 screenshots, which 2 to send, that nonsensical sentence implies your friend needs to send you his screenshot so you can include it in your email along with your first one and DISREGARD your second one? And what should that friend send in turn? The other 2 games?
Why can't WG ever give clear instructions rather than concepts delivered from an addled mind incapable of parsing its nonsense into concise English.
Major_Rampage: You need 4 screen shots.
Game#1
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Game#2
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Which each screen shot should look something like this:

Only one of the two players needs to submit all of the information.
See that was nice and easy.
Game#1
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Game#2
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Which each screen shot should look something like this:

Only one of the two players needs to submit all of the information.
See that was nice and easy.
Subject: Party for Two: MVP Event
Link on message: #4180712
Allurai, on Apr 11 2013 - 21:44, said: That's my point though, its one entry per person, and all 4
screenshots in 1 entry.
Person C can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person B can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A can submit his entry, with Person X as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A was in 3 entries, but still only 1 entry per person has been submitted.
I don't see how the situation above, and the situation I posted in bold a few posts ago violates this rule from MR. I would like him to confirm one way or the other though.
Verilogus, on Apr 11 2013 - 22:01, said: Trust WG to come up with something convoluted, not explain it
adequately and provide a useless example.
What does this even mean?
You and your platoonmate will have 4 screenshots, which 2 to send, that nonsensical sentence implies your friend needs to send you his screenshot so you can include it in your email along with your first one and DISREGARD your second one? And what should that friend send in turn? The other 2 games?
Why can't WG ever give clear instructions rather than concepts delivered from an addled mind incapable of parsing its nonsense into concise English.
Link on message: #4180712
Allurai, on Apr 11 2013 - 21:44, said: That's my point though, its one entry per person, and all 4
screenshots in 1 entry.Person C can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person B can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A can submit his entry, with Person X as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A was in 3 entries, but still only 1 entry per person has been submitted.
I don't see how the situation above, and the situation I posted in bold a few posts ago violates this rule from MR. I would like him to confirm one way or the other though.
Major_Rampage: No one player can be entered more then once.
Verilogus, on Apr 11 2013 - 22:01, said: Trust WG to come up with something convoluted, not explain it
adequately and provide a useless example.What does this even mean?
You and your platoonmate will have 4 screenshots, which 2 to send, that nonsensical sentence implies your friend needs to send you his screenshot so you can include it in your email along with your first one and DISREGARD your second one? And what should that friend send in turn? The other 2 games?
Why can't WG ever give clear instructions rather than concepts delivered from an addled mind incapable of parsing its nonsense into concise English.
Major_Rampage: You need 4 screen shots.
Game#1
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Game#2
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Which each screen shot should look something like this:

Only one of the two players needs to submit all of the information.
See that was nice and easy.
Game#1
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Game#2
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Which each screen shot should look something like this:

Only one of the two players needs to submit all of the information.
See that was nice and easy.
Subject: Party for Two: MVP Event
Link on message: #4180712
Allurai, on Apr 11 2013 - 21:44, said: That's my point though, its one entry per person, and all 4
screenshots in 1 entry.
Person C can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person B can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A can submit his entry, with Person X as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A was in 3 entries, but still only 1 entry per person has been submitted.
I don't see how the situation above, and the situation I posted in bold a few posts ago violates this rule from MR. I would like him to confirm one way or the other though.
Verilogus, on Apr 11 2013 - 22:01, said: Trust WG to come up with something convoluted, not explain it
adequately and provide a useless example.
What does this even mean?
You and your platoonmate will have 4 screenshots, which 2 to send, that nonsensical sentence implies your friend needs to send you his screenshot so you can include it in your email along with your first one and DISREGARD your second one? And what should that friend send in turn? The other 2 games?
Why can't WG ever give clear instructions rather than concepts delivered from an addled mind incapable of parsing its nonsense into concise English.
Link on message: #4180712
Allurai, on Apr 11 2013 - 21:44, said: That's my point though, its one entry per person, and all 4
screenshots in 1 entry.Person C can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person B can submit his entry, with Person A as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A can submit his entry, with Person X as the 2nd person in the platoon.
Person A was in 3 entries, but still only 1 entry per person has been submitted.
I don't see how the situation above, and the situation I posted in bold a few posts ago violates this rule from MR. I would like him to confirm one way or the other though.
Major_Rampage: No one player can be entered more then once.
Verilogus, on Apr 11 2013 - 22:01, said: Trust WG to come up with something convoluted, not explain it
adequately and provide a useless example.What does this even mean?
You and your platoonmate will have 4 screenshots, which 2 to send, that nonsensical sentence implies your friend needs to send you his screenshot so you can include it in your email along with your first one and DISREGARD your second one? And what should that friend send in turn? The other 2 games?
Why can't WG ever give clear instructions rather than concepts delivered from an addled mind incapable of parsing its nonsense into concise English.
Major_Rampage: You need 4 screen shots.
Game#1
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Game#2
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Which each screen shot should look something like this:

Only one of the two players needs to submit all of the information.
See that was nice and easy.
Game#1
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Game#2
Player #1 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Player #2 Personal Score (with the pop up display)
Which each screen shot should look something like this:

Only one of the two players needs to submit all of the information.
See that was nice and easy.
Реклама | Adv















