Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Rampage's Ruckus Champion TC: Sept. 27th
Link on message: #5571810
Link on message: #5571810
Major_Rampage: This Friday from 15:00-18:00 PDT Laera and I will be running a
Champion Tank Company. Anyone who faces our team has a
chance to win gold. A win will earn you 600
Gold, a loss 300 Gold, and nothing for a
draw. You can watch our stream on: http://www.twitch.tv/worldoftanks
We had almost a 75% win rate last week, can anyone stop the roll we have been on?
If you are streaming on Twitch.tv while you face us, and send me a link to your stream (with the time stamp of when you faced us) you will earn double the winnings.
Please keep in mind you may need to turn back on Archieve your stream after the last twitch.tv update.
Please note that We will be playing on NA West.
We had almost a 75% win rate last week, can anyone stop the roll we have been on?
If you are streaming on Twitch.tv while you face us, and send me a link to your stream (with the time stamp of when you faced us) you will earn double the winnings.
Please keep in mind you may need to turn back on Archieve your stream after the last twitch.tv update.
Please note that We will be playing on NA West.
Subject: Daily Blitz 3 v 3 - General Discussion
Link on message: #5571783
Another_Red_Headed_Ninja, on Sep 25 2013 - 21:55, said: It's saying tier 3 limit today...... should be tier 6.
SatyrAngel, on Sep 25 2013 - 21:58, said: Yeah its tier 3, WTH!!!!
Link on message: #5571783
Another_Red_Headed_Ninja, on Sep 25 2013 - 21:55, said: It's saying tier 3 limit today...... should be tier 6.dance210: Looking into the problem, seeing if anything can be done now...
Only the first 2 battles are scheduled at Tier 3. All the other battles have the correct Tier limit. Sorry for the inconvenience and confusion :(
Only the first 2 battles are scheduled at Tier 3. All the other battles have the correct Tier limit. Sorry for the inconvenience and confusion :(
SatyrAngel, on Sep 25 2013 - 21:58, said: Yeah its tier 3, WTH!!!!dance210:
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5571377
Link on message: #5571377
Laera: MandoWarrior1 and Dreadnaught151, please take this discussion to
PMs. Thanks.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5571377
Link on message: #5571377
Laera: MandoWarrior1 and Dreadnaught151, please take this discussion to
PMs. Thanks.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5571377
Link on message: #5571377
Laera: MandoWarrior1 and Dreadnaught151, please take this discussion to
PMs. Thanks.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5571377
Link on message: #5571377
Laera: MandoWarrior1 and Dreadnaught151, please take this discussion to
PMs. Thanks.
Subject: Daily Blitz 3 v 3 - General Discussion
Link on message: #5571270
30K, on Sep 25 2013 - 20:50, said: haven't got the gold from last Friday
lets not forget it shall we
Link on message: #5571270
30K, on Sep 25 2013 - 20:50, said: haven't got the gold from last Fridaylets not forget it shall we
dance210: On the Friday 9/20L Blitz, your team tied in points for second
place with another team. The other team defeated you which,
according to the draw rules (posted below) resulted in you losing
the head-to-head match-up and not being eligible for the gold.
Sorry that I do not have better news for you.
Draws at the end of the round will be resolved based on the following criteria (and in the following order):Head to Head
Head to Head Against Group Leader
Opponent Strength - final rank of opponents that have defeated your team
Complete Draw - gold split
Draws at the end of the round will be resolved based on the following criteria (and in the following order):Head to Head
Head to Head Against Group Leader
Opponent Strength - final rank of opponents that have defeated your team
Complete Draw - gold split
Subject: Posting Policy in CR/D
Link on message: #5571260
B0B_Ross, on Sep 25 2013 - 19:50, said: Hyp are we getting the is6 or not? Is ru getting it
still? We wont be mad if they are, at this point we are
too resigned to really get upset about it.
Lert, on Sep 25 2013 - 19:45, said: Number of battles is irrelevant. Having played pub matches =/=
having done CW. Besides, it wouldn't keep eedyuts out anyways.
Worstplayer_NA, on Sep 25 2013 - 19:54, said: How about minimum w/r + battle count?
I'm pretty sure I can like afl and get 49%+
WhellerNG, on Sep 25 2013 - 19:56, said: I would vote for 0. ONLY because of a forum error which routinely
seems to be showing random user's battle count as 0, thus not
allowing them to post regardless of standing.
Link on message: #5571260
B0B_Ross, on Sep 25 2013 - 19:50, said: Hyp are we getting the is6 or not? Is ru getting it
still? We wont be mad if they are, at this point we are
too resigned to really get upset about it.Hypnotik: If you don't see it on the official portal, it's not happening.
IS-6 isn't mentioned in their articles, nor is it in ours.
Lert, on Sep 25 2013 - 19:45, said: Number of battles is irrelevant. Having played pub matches =/=
having done CW. Besides, it wouldn't keep eedyuts out anyways.Hypnotik: This is a very valid point. CW battles are a very different animal
than a pub battle, however the only number integrated into the
forum software is the overall battle count.
Worstplayer_NA, on Sep 25 2013 - 19:54, said: How about minimum w/r + battle count?I'm pretty sure I can like afl and get 49%+
Hypnotik: Win Rate is not available to us, and it's very unlikely that we'd
base posting privileges on it anyway.
WhellerNG, on Sep 25 2013 - 19:56, said: I would vote for 0. ONLY because of a forum error which routinely
seems to be showing random user's battle count as 0, thus not
allowing them to post regardless of standing.Hypnotik: It's my understanding that this was corrected. If you know of
someone who is still experiencing this, please have them contact
us.
Subject: To Le Mods -- it's time to make CRD exclusive
Link on message: #5571101
ArmoredCorps, on Sep 25 2013 - 19:24, said: Fix CRD -- here's how!
1) no clan tags -- you can't access CRD. As in, it's not even listed. And for good measure, you can't access CRD.
2) If your clan hasn't participated in clan wars in the last 10 days, you can't see CRD.
Participation can be as little as a single LZ / riot battle participation. Obviously holding lands means you can see it.
10 may seem like a small number, but if you're so inactive or have such difficulty fielding teams you can't be bothered to try and grab land in 10 days, you're not a clan wars clan and have no business here.
3) if your clan hasn't earned gold in the last 30 days (held just 1 province for 1 day), you can't see CRD.
This too may seem harsh. But why? There exists literally no rivalry between Alabama Crimson Tide and a Division II or Division III school. They're so far not in the same league they obviously don't play.
There can't be. What 'rivalry' can exist between teams where the final score would approach triple-digits for one team and none for the other?
If you can't even win an LZ in 30 days, there's just no relevant 'rivalry' or 'diplomacy' which is necessary.
What can these clans possibly contribute? Empty rhetoric, reportmandering, and trolling, and that's it.
4) community moderators. And I would say more, but you'll never do this.
5) limit thread creation to players of clans who have held at least 2 simultaneous provinces for 3 days in a 30 day span
6) limit posts to players in otherwise-eligible clans who have at least logged in in the last 30 days
7) your responses
8) there is only One Patton and M60_Jesus is his prophet
This should strip out, oh, HALF the garbage in this sub-forum.
PS -- I hear Russia's getting free IS-6 for Earning Your Steel Parts 1-3 completion, but NA & EU aren't causelol Russian Bias. Confirm/deny??
Link on message: #5571101
ArmoredCorps, on Sep 25 2013 - 19:24, said: Fix CRD -- here's how!1) no clan tags -- you can't access CRD. As in, it's not even listed. And for good measure, you can't access CRD.
2) If your clan hasn't participated in clan wars in the last 10 days, you can't see CRD.
Participation can be as little as a single LZ / riot battle participation. Obviously holding lands means you can see it.
10 may seem like a small number, but if you're so inactive or have such difficulty fielding teams you can't be bothered to try and grab land in 10 days, you're not a clan wars clan and have no business here.
3) if your clan hasn't earned gold in the last 30 days (held just 1 province for 1 day), you can't see CRD.
This too may seem harsh. But why? There exists literally no rivalry between Alabama Crimson Tide and a Division II or Division III school. They're so far not in the same league they obviously don't play.
There can't be. What 'rivalry' can exist between teams where the final score would approach triple-digits for one team and none for the other?
If you can't even win an LZ in 30 days, there's just no relevant 'rivalry' or 'diplomacy' which is necessary.
What can these clans possibly contribute? Empty rhetoric, reportmandering, and trolling, and that's it.
4) community moderators. And I would say more, but you'll never do this.
5) limit thread creation to players of clans who have held at least 2 simultaneous provinces for 3 days in a 30 day span
6) limit posts to players in otherwise-eligible clans who have at least logged in in the last 30 days
7) your responses
8) there is only One Patton and M60_Jesus is his prophet
This should strip out, oh, HALF the garbage in this sub-forum.
PS -- I hear Russia's getting free IS-6 for Earning Your Steel Parts 1-3 completion, but NA & EU aren't causelol Russian Bias. Confirm/deny??
Quemapueblos: Currently we can't restrict players from viewing or posting by
anything other than battle count. It might be helpful to raise the
minimum number of battles required, so we can start a poll to determine what players feel is a
good number for CRD.
I think its a good idea to at least allow players take a look through CRD if they want. This restriction would only be for posting as many people find it useful and interesting to read about clan drama but may not be eligible.
I know we have tried community moderation is the past but it wasn't the best solution for either party. We are currently transitioning to an improved moderation system and we expect the moderation to be more precise and effective, particularly in CRD.
Thanks for taking the time to provide us with some concise feedback and please feel free to continue to provide more as we go through these changes.
I think its a good idea to at least allow players take a look through CRD if they want. This restriction would only be for posting as many people find it useful and interesting to read about clan drama but may not be eligible.
I know we have tried community moderation is the past but it wasn't the best solution for either party. We are currently transitioning to an improved moderation system and we expect the moderation to be more precise and effective, particularly in CRD.
Thanks for taking the time to provide us with some concise feedback and please feel free to continue to provide more as we go through these changes.
Subject: Posting Policy in CR/D
Link on message: #5570971
Link on message: #5570971
Hypnotik: Hello all,
There's been a lot of discussion lately in here about how posting privileges in CR/D should be handled. Unfortunately, it isn't currently possible to base this on Clan membership - the only game-linked value to base this on is battles played. We have discussed increasing the minimum battle requirement, and would like to know how you all feel about this requirement.
We'll also leave this topic open for discussion, so please tell us why you think it should be the option you chose.
There's been a lot of discussion lately in here about how posting privileges in CR/D should be handled. Unfortunately, it isn't currently possible to base this on Clan membership - the only game-linked value to base this on is battles played. We have discussed increasing the minimum battle requirement, and would like to know how you all feel about this requirement.
We'll also leave this topic open for discussion, so please tell us why you think it should be the option you chose.
Subject: Open League Championship Series, Fall 2013 Qualifiers
Link on message: #5570379
thurty3, on Sep 25 2013 - 17:43, said: Hello all, BKA here. We are new to the leagues. We have had a blast
playing all of the teams we have played. We are still learning some
tactics with different vehicles.
My question, and it may be redundant, but we finished 3rd last night in our group. Does that mean we are in the open league? I am just a little confused on why we need to play a 3rd round if we are in due to our result in round 2. We will show up with bells and whistles on tonight anyway and give it what we got.
Good luck to all.
Link on message: #5570379
thurty3, on Sep 25 2013 - 17:43, said: Hello all, BKA here. We are new to the leagues. We have had a blast
playing all of the teams we have played. We are still learning some
tactics with different vehicles.My question, and it may be redundant, but we finished 3rd last night in our group. Does that mean we are in the open league? I am just a little confused on why we need to play a 3rd round if we are in due to our result in round 2. We will show up with bells and whistles on tonight anyway and give it what we got.
Good luck to all.
dance210: If you made it into the 3rd Qualifier Round, then your team has
qualified for the Open League. Tonight's round is to select the 4
teams that will battle Friday night for the 2 open Minor League
spots. Hope that helps clear up your confusion.
Subject: Put Me In Coach: T110E4
Link on message: #5569477
Link on message: #5569477
Quemapueblos: Bryant21 will be posting daily discussion on Reddit focusing on
Tier Xs and their usage in clan wars called "Put Me In Coach." The
goal for this is to give new players an idea of how frequently and
when tier Xs are using in clan wars, while also generating some
interesting discussion.
This series covers:Pros/Cons
Clan Wars Usage
Range
Role
Average Per Team
How this tank is good for Clan Wars
Why this tank is bad for Clan Wars
What about public battles Today's discussion is on the American Tank Destroyer: T110E4 (Wiki) (Tankopedia)

Check out the Reddit article and discussion here!
This series covers:Pros/Cons
Clan Wars Usage
Range
Role
Average Per Team
How this tank is good for Clan Wars
Why this tank is bad for Clan Wars
What about public battles Today's discussion is on the American Tank Destroyer: T110E4 (Wiki) (Tankopedia)

Check out the Reddit article and discussion here!
Subject: Put Me In Coach: T110E4
Link on message: #5569477
Link on message: #5569477
Quemapueblos: Bryant21 will be posting daily discussion on Reddit focusing on
Tier Xs and their usage in clan wars called "Put Me In Coach." The
goal for this is to give new players an idea of how frequently and
when tier Xs are using in clan wars, while also generating some
interesting discussion.
This series covers: Pros/Cons
Clan Wars Usage
Range
Role
Average Per Team
How this tank is good for Clan Wars
Why this tank is bad for Clan Wars
What about public battles Today's discussion is on the American Tank Destroyer: T110E4 (Wiki) (Tankopedia)

Check out the Reddit article and discussion here!
This series covers: Pros/Cons
Clan Wars Usage
Range
Role
Average Per Team
How this tank is good for Clan Wars
Why this tank is bad for Clan Wars
What about public battles Today's discussion is on the American Tank Destroyer: T110E4 (Wiki) (Tankopedia)

Check out the Reddit article and discussion here!
Subject: Put Me In Coach: T110E4
Link on message: #5569477
Link on message: #5569477
Quemapueblos: Bryant21 will be posting daily discussion on Reddit focusing on
Tier Xs and their usage in clan wars called "Put Me In Coach." The
goal for this is to give new players an idea of how frequently and
when tier Xs are using in clan wars, while also generating some
interesting discussion.
This series covers: Pros/Cons
Clan Wars Usage
Range
Role
Average Per Team
How this tank is good for Clan Wars
Why this tank is bad for Clan Wars
What about public battles Today's discussion is on the American Tank Destroyer: T110E4 (Wiki) (Tankopedia)

Check out the Reddit article and discussion here!
This series covers: Pros/Cons
Clan Wars Usage
Range
Role
Average Per Team
How this tank is good for Clan Wars
Why this tank is bad for Clan Wars
What about public battles Today's discussion is on the American Tank Destroyer: T110E4 (Wiki) (Tankopedia)

Check out the Reddit article and discussion here!
Subject: Can't buy gold.
Link on message: #5569250
Tonkar, on Sep 24 2013 - 15:36, said: Have already opened ticket, as have other people, and getting no
response, how else do we not pass go
Link on message: #5569250
Tonkar, on Sep 24 2013 - 15:36, said: Have already opened ticket, as have other people, and getting no
response, how else do we not pass goJewel_Thief: Your ticket was answered yesterday... Your issue actually lies with
PlaySpan (UltimatePay) -- please contact them directly.
Best of luck!
~JT
Best of luck!
~JT
Subject: Daily Blitz 3 v 3 - General Discussion
Link on message: #5565475
Endyo, on Sep 25 2013 - 03:06, said: How did I miss this registration? This sucks.
Link on message: #5565475
Endyo, on Sep 25 2013 - 03:06, said: How did I miss this registration? This sucks.dance210: Registration for tomorrow's Blitz is still open! You have until Wed
Sep 25, 10 am PT to submit a team for approval :)
They run Mon, Wed, Fri and Sun; registration opens the day before each Blitz.
They run Mon, Wed, Fri and Sun; registration opens the day before each Blitz.
Subject: Live: Wargaming CEO Speaks at D.I.C.E. Europe
Link on message: #5563926
B0B_Ross, on Sep 24 2013 - 23:40, said: I hope someone throws a shoe at serb
SdKfz252, on Sep 24 2013 - 23:41, said: "Channel Offline".....Lulz.
Link on message: #5563926
B0B_Ross, on Sep 24 2013 - 23:40, said: I hope someone throws a shoe at serbLaera: Let's be nice, we all know shoes are stinky. :(
SdKfz252, on Sep 24 2013 - 23:41, said: "Channel Offline".....Lulz.Laera: When: 02:15 PDT (05:15 EDT) to 03:00 PDT (06:00 EDT) on Wednesday,
September 25, 2013
Subject: Live: Wargaming CEO Speaks at D.I.C.E. Europe
Link on message: #5563926
B0B_Ross, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:40, said: I hope someone throws a shoe at serb
SdKfz252, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:41, said: "Channel Offline".....Lulz.
Link on message: #5563926
B0B_Ross, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:40, said: I hope someone throws a shoe at serbLaera:
Let's be nice, we all know shoes are stinky. :(
Let's be nice, we all know shoes are stinky. :(
SdKfz252, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:41, said: "Channel Offline".....Lulz.Laera:
When: 02:15 PDT (05:15 EDT) to 03:00 PDT (06:00 EDT) on Wednesday, September 25, 2013
When: 02:15 PDT (05:15 EDT) to 03:00 PDT (06:00 EDT) on Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Subject: Live: Wargaming CEO Speaks at D.I.C.E. Europe
Link on message: #5563926
B0B_Ross, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:40, said: I hope someone throws a shoe at serb
SdKfz252, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:41, said: "Channel Offline".....Lulz.
Link on message: #5563926
B0B_Ross, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:40, said: I hope someone throws a shoe at serbLaera:
Let's be nice, we all know shoes are stinky. :(
Let's be nice, we all know shoes are stinky. :(
SdKfz252, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:41, said: "Channel Offline".....Lulz.Laera:
When: 02:15 PDT (05:15 EDT) to 03:00 PDT (06:00 EDT) on Wednesday, September 25, 2013
When: 02:15 PDT (05:15 EDT) to 03:00 PDT (06:00 EDT) on Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Subject: Live: Wargaming CEO Speaks at D.I.C.E. Europe
Link on message: #5563926
B0B_Ross, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:40, said: I hope someone throws a shoe at serb
SdKfz252, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:41, said: "Channel Offline".....Lulz.
Link on message: #5563926
B0B_Ross, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:40, said: I hope someone throws a shoe at serbLaera:
Let's be nice, we all know shoes are stinky. :(
Let's be nice, we all know shoes are stinky. :(
SdKfz252, on Sep 24 2013 - 22:41, said: "Channel Offline".....Lulz.Laera:
When: 02:15 PDT (05:15 EDT) to 03:00 PDT (06:00 EDT) on Wednesday, September 25, 2013
When: 02:15 PDT (05:15 EDT) to 03:00 PDT (06:00 EDT) on Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Subject: Skirmish 38
Link on message: #5563919
Link on message: #5563919
Yoott: F.A.Q.
Skirmish Rules
Tournament Page Tier Limits
With a maximum of 9 players per battle, a team (maximum 12 players per team) must field a selection of tanks based on the below, maximum tier limits.9 vs 9
Tier Limits
Heavy: 7
Medium: 7
TD: 7
Light: 4
SPG: 554 points maximum
Map: Arctic Region Victory Conditions
The winner of each round will be determined as the first to 3 victories on a given map.
Each battle will last 10 minutes.
The Standard battle mode will be used for this tournament.
Schedule
Note that only 64 teams will be allowed to participate. Teams will be accepted on a first come, first serve basis, see Registration for details.
The full schedule will be provided at the close of registration, once the final team count has been determined. Rounds will begin at 19:30 PDT (22:30 EST, 02:30 UTC the following day) each scheduled day. Curious what time this is in your region? Use this handy Time Zone Converter to help you out!Round 1: Sep 30th
Round 2: Oct 1st
Round 3: Oct 2nd
Round 4: Oct 3rd
Round 5: Oct 4th
Round 6: Oct 5thThere will be a 2 minute break in between battles for each round.
Prizes
The following prizes will be provided to each member of the respective winning team, including reserves. First place: 5,000
Second place: 2,000
Third place: 1,000
Fourth place: 1,000 Maps
There will only be one map used during Skirmish 38. The map will be Arctic Region
Skirmish Rules
Tournament Page Tier Limits
With a maximum of 9 players per battle, a team (maximum 12 players per team) must field a selection of tanks based on the below, maximum tier limits.9 vs 9
Tier Limits
Heavy: 7
Medium: 7
TD: 7
Light: 4
SPG: 554 points maximum
Map: Arctic Region Victory Conditions
The winner of each round will be determined as the first to 3 victories on a given map.
Each battle will last 10 minutes.
The Standard battle mode will be used for this tournament.
Schedule
Note that only 64 teams will be allowed to participate. Teams will be accepted on a first come, first serve basis, see Registration for details.
The full schedule will be provided at the close of registration, once the final team count has been determined. Rounds will begin at 19:30 PDT (22:30 EST, 02:30 UTC the following day) each scheduled day. Curious what time this is in your region? Use this handy Time Zone Converter to help you out!Round 1: Sep 30th
Round 2: Oct 1st
Round 3: Oct 2nd
Round 4: Oct 3rd
Round 5: Oct 4th
Round 6: Oct 5thThere will be a 2 minute break in between battles for each round.
Prizes
The following prizes will be provided to each member of the respective winning team, including reserves. First place: 5,000
Second place: 2,000
Third place: 1,000
Fourth place: 1,000 Maps
There will only be one map used during Skirmish 38. The map will be Arctic Region
Subject: Skirmish 38
Link on message: #5563919
Link on message: #5563919
Yoott: F.A.Q.
Skirmish Rules
Tournament Page Tier Limits
With a maximum of 9 players per battle, a team (maximum 12 players per team) must field a selection of tanks based on the below, maximum tier limits. 9 vs 9
Tier Limits
Heavy: 7
Medium: 7
TD: 7
Light: 4
SPG: 5 54 points maximum
Map: Arctic Region Victory Conditions
The winner of each round will be determined as the first to 3 victories on a given map.
Each battle will last 10 minutes.
The Standard battle mode will be used for this tournament.
Schedule
Note that only 64 teams will be allowed to participate. Teams will be accepted on a first come, first serve basis, see Registration for details.
The full schedule will be provided at the close of registration, once the final team count has been determined. Rounds will begin at 19:30 PDT (22:30 EST, 02:30 UTC the following day) each scheduled day. Curious what time this is in your region? Use this handy Time Zone Converter to help you out! Round 1: Sep 30th
Round 2: Oct 1st
Round 3: Oct 2nd
Round 4: Oct 3rd
Round 5: Oct 4th
Round 6: Oct 5th There will be a 2 minute break in between battles for each round.
Prizes
The following prizes will be provided to each member of the respective winning team, including reserves. First place: 5,000
Second place: 2,000
Third place: 1,000
Fourth place: 1,000 Maps
There will only be one map used during Skirmish 38. The map will be Arctic Region
Skirmish Rules
Tournament Page Tier Limits
With a maximum of 9 players per battle, a team (maximum 12 players per team) must field a selection of tanks based on the below, maximum tier limits. 9 vs 9
Tier Limits
Heavy: 7
Medium: 7
TD: 7
Light: 4
SPG: 5 54 points maximum
Map: Arctic Region Victory Conditions
The winner of each round will be determined as the first to 3 victories on a given map.
Each battle will last 10 minutes.
The Standard battle mode will be used for this tournament.
Schedule
Note that only 64 teams will be allowed to participate. Teams will be accepted on a first come, first serve basis, see Registration for details.
The full schedule will be provided at the close of registration, once the final team count has been determined. Rounds will begin at 19:30 PDT (22:30 EST, 02:30 UTC the following day) each scheduled day. Curious what time this is in your region? Use this handy Time Zone Converter to help you out! Round 1: Sep 30th
Round 2: Oct 1st
Round 3: Oct 2nd
Round 4: Oct 3rd
Round 5: Oct 4th
Round 6: Oct 5th There will be a 2 minute break in between battles for each round.
Prizes
The following prizes will be provided to each member of the respective winning team, including reserves. First place: 5,000
Second place: 2,000
Third place: 1,000
Fourth place: 1,000 Maps
There will only be one map used during Skirmish 38. The map will be Arctic Region
Subject: Flers Courcelette Challenge
Link on message: #5562987
Link on message: #5562987
Captain_Judo: Congratulations, team T32 best tier 8
2013 
Beginning with the quarterfinals, T32 best tier 8 2013 faced consecutive group winners and top seeded teams: River of Blood, Peauxpsce Ahoy and finally Serb is the Word. Nice job
explosionman007
HeerKommander
masterpupil2
Prime_Sentinel
remove_TELIA_from_game
Valachio (Captain)
Winn
xRanger
Stay tuned in October for our Battle of Overloon challenge, where we raise certain tiers to VIII.
Beginning with the quarterfinals, T32 best tier 8 2013 faced consecutive group winners and top seeded teams: River of Blood, Peauxpsce Ahoy and finally Serb is the Word. Nice job
HeerKommander
masterpupil2
Prime_Sentinel
remove_TELIA_from_game
Valachio (Captain)
Winn
xRanger
Stay tuned in October for our Battle of Overloon challenge, where we raise certain tiers to VIII.
Subject: Flers Courcelette Challenge
Link on message: #5562987
Link on message: #5562987
Captain_Judo: Congratulations, team T32 best tier 8
2013 
Beginning with the quarterfinals, T32 best tier 8 2013 faced consecutive group winners and top seeded teams: River of Blood, Peauxpsce Ahoy and finally Serb is the Word. Nice job
explosionman007
HeerKommander
masterpupil2
Prime_Sentinel
remove_TELIA_from_game
Valachio (Captain)
Winn
xRanger
Stay tuned in October for our Battle of Overloon challenge, where we raise certain tiers to VIII.
Beginning with the quarterfinals, T32 best tier 8 2013 faced consecutive group winners and top seeded teams: River of Blood, Peauxpsce Ahoy and finally Serb is the Word. Nice job
HeerKommander
masterpupil2
Prime_Sentinel
remove_TELIA_from_game
Valachio (Captain)
Winn
xRanger
Stay tuned in October for our Battle of Overloon challenge, where we raise certain tiers to VIII.
Subject: Flers Courcelette Challenge
Link on message: #5562987
Link on message: #5562987
Captain_Judo: Congratulations, team T32 best tier 8
2013 
Beginning with the quarterfinals, T32 best tier 8 2013 faced consecutive group winners and top seeded teams: River of Blood, Peauxpsce Ahoy and finally Serb is the Word. Nice job
explosionman007
HeerKommander
masterpupil2
Prime_Sentinel
remove_TELIA_from_game
Valachio (Captain)
Winn
xRanger
Stay tuned in October for our Battle of Overloon challenge, where we raise certain tiers to VIII.
Beginning with the quarterfinals, T32 best tier 8 2013 faced consecutive group winners and top seeded teams: River of Blood, Peauxpsce Ahoy and finally Serb is the Word. Nice job
HeerKommander
masterpupil2
Prime_Sentinel
remove_TELIA_from_game
Valachio (Captain)
Winn
xRanger
Stay tuned in October for our Battle of Overloon challenge, where we raise certain tiers to VIII.
Subject: Clan Spotlight Survey Results
Link on message: #5562141
Link on message: #5562141
Hypnotik: Recently we asked you all for feedback about the Clan Spotlight
series, and we received a great response. Thank you to all those
who answered the questions, we appreciate it. Now we’d like to
share the results with you.
Overall, people are very happy with the length of the interviews, both portal and extended (forum) versions.
There were several great recommendations of questions for Clans in the Spotlight which we intend to ask in future interviews and livestreams.
Most people do not stream when they are trying to fight against the Spotlight Company, but this was an expected result. The reasons were pretty equally because either players prefer not to stream their gameplay or because their computer/connection can’t handle it. Some people were unaware that this is a way to double their winnings - all you have to do is stream your match on your own Twitch account, and send me a link to your stream after the fight in a forum PM.
The primary reasons that people like to watch the stream on Twitch.tv were to learn how other clans call battles and to see how other clans communicate with each other. This is one of the main objectives of this series, so we’re glad to hear they’re being used as such.
The most common types of questions people would like to see in the future are “Clan Wars strategies/experiences” and “history of the Clan”. These will both be focused on a little bit more in the future, especially during the Spotlights on the more experienced clans. There were also several great write-in responses to this question.
Many people also wrote about the types of Clans they’d like to see in the spotlight, and it was a very mixed response. Many like to see the more experienced and more influential Clans, while others want to see the smaller Clans get their 15 minutes. You’ll end up seeing both, but the way Clans are selected is a bit more complex than that. We choose a Clan to feature for a variety of reasons, usually a different reason each time.
Overall, people are very happy with the length of the interviews, both portal and extended (forum) versions.
There were several great recommendations of questions for Clans in the Spotlight which we intend to ask in future interviews and livestreams.
Most people do not stream when they are trying to fight against the Spotlight Company, but this was an expected result. The reasons were pretty equally because either players prefer not to stream their gameplay or because their computer/connection can’t handle it. Some people were unaware that this is a way to double their winnings - all you have to do is stream your match on your own Twitch account, and send me a link to your stream after the fight in a forum PM.
The primary reasons that people like to watch the stream on Twitch.tv were to learn how other clans call battles and to see how other clans communicate with each other. This is one of the main objectives of this series, so we’re glad to hear they’re being used as such.
The most common types of questions people would like to see in the future are “Clan Wars strategies/experiences” and “history of the Clan”. These will both be focused on a little bit more in the future, especially during the Spotlights on the more experienced clans. There were also several great write-in responses to this question.
Many people also wrote about the types of Clans they’d like to see in the spotlight, and it was a very mixed response. Many like to see the more experienced and more influential Clans, while others want to see the smaller Clans get their 15 minutes. You’ll end up seeing both, but the way Clans are selected is a bit more complex than that. We choose a Clan to feature for a variety of reasons, usually a different reason each time.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5562025
Tolos, on Sep 24 2013 - 20:03, said: So I'll ask again
To " clean up " the forums, will you be banning known trolls and racists ?
You have people like Garbad who was nothing, but honest ( a little to much at times ) perma banned, but the likes of Jsnazz who is a known troll are still allowed to post. If you ban one, you have to ban the other.
Link on message: #5562025
Tolos, on Sep 24 2013 - 20:03, said: So I'll ask againTo " clean up " the forums, will you be banning known trolls and racists ?
You have people like Garbad who was nothing, but honest ( a little to much at times ) perma banned, but the likes of Jsnazz who is a known troll are still allowed to post. If you ban one, you have to ban the other.
Laera: With the new system in place negative influences will get
themselves removed very quickly. Racist content is absolutely not
tolerated and if you see anything please report it immediately.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5562025
Tolos, on Sep 24 2013 - 19:03, said: So I'll ask again
To " clean up " the forums, will you be banning known trolls and racists ?
You have people like Garbad who was nothing, but honest ( a little to much at times ) perma banned, but the likes of Jsnazz who is a known troll are still allowed to post. If you ban one, you have to ban the other.
Link on message: #5562025
Tolos, on Sep 24 2013 - 19:03, said: So I'll ask againTo " clean up " the forums, will you be banning known trolls and racists ?
You have people like Garbad who was nothing, but honest ( a little to much at times ) perma banned, but the likes of Jsnazz who is a known troll are still allowed to post. If you ban one, you have to ban the other.
Laera: With the new system in place negative influences will get
themselves removed very quickly. Racist content is absolutely not
tolerated and if you see anything please report it immediately.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5562025
Tolos, on Sep 24 2013 - 19:03, said: So I'll ask again
To " clean up " the forums, will you be banning known trolls and racists ?
You have people like Garbad who was nothing, but honest ( a little to much at times ) perma banned, but the likes of Jsnazz who is a known troll are still allowed to post. If you ban one, you have to ban the other.
Link on message: #5562025
Tolos, on Sep 24 2013 - 19:03, said: So I'll ask againTo " clean up " the forums, will you be banning known trolls and racists ?
You have people like Garbad who was nothing, but honest ( a little to much at times ) perma banned, but the likes of Jsnazz who is a known troll are still allowed to post. If you ban one, you have to ban the other.
Laera: With the new system in place negative influences will get
themselves removed very quickly. Racist content is absolutely not
tolerated and if you see anything please report it immediately.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5562025
Tolos, on Sep 24 2013 - 19:03, said: So I'll ask again
To " clean up " the forums, will you be banning known trolls and racists ?
You have people like Garbad who was nothing, but honest ( a little to much at times ) perma banned, but the likes of Jsnazz who is a known troll are still allowed to post. If you ban one, you have to ban the other.
Link on message: #5562025
Tolos, on Sep 24 2013 - 19:03, said: So I'll ask againTo " clean up " the forums, will you be banning known trolls and racists ?
You have people like Garbad who was nothing, but honest ( a little to much at times ) perma banned, but the likes of Jsnazz who is a known troll are still allowed to post. If you ban one, you have to ban the other.
Laera: With the new system in place negative influences will get
themselves removed very quickly. Racist content is absolutely not
tolerated and if you see anything please report it immediately.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5561985
KampfKopf, on Sep 24 2013 - 13:01, said: Does the new forum guidelines apply to WoWP as well as WoT, or will
there be 2 separate sets of guidelines for the forums of games
coming from the same parent company? If they apply to
both, then where's the posting of that info, as well as the reset
of warning points, at forum WoWP?
I would advise WG in not having different standards for these two forums as it goes against your goal of a "Unified Account" at the very least.
As well as the minor issue that people like to be treated equally, not so?
#535
ElvenLord, on Sep 24 2013 - 18:02, said: Since you are doing feedback here Laera...
Petitioning for additions to the game is now a moderator-able offense?
EXAMPLE:
http://forum.worldof...ld-type-59/#top
Does this mean that suggestions will also be moderated as technically they can be seen as petitions?
Link on message: #5561985
KampfKopf, on Sep 24 2013 - 13:01, said: Does the new forum guidelines apply to WoWP as well as WoT, or will
there be 2 separate sets of guidelines for the forums of games
coming from the same parent company? If they apply to
both, then where's the posting of that info, as well as the reset
of warning points, at forum WoWP?I would advise WG in not having different standards for these two forums as it goes against your goal of a "Unified Account" at the very least.
As well as the minor issue that people like to be treated equally, not so?
#535
Laera: We're working to move this new Community Guidelines and new
moderation standards over to the WoWP and 360 forums very soon.
ElvenLord, on Sep 24 2013 - 18:02, said: Since you are doing feedback here Laera...Petitioning for additions to the game is now a moderator-able offense?
EXAMPLE:
http://forum.worldof...ld-type-59/#top
Does this mean that suggestions will also be moderated as technically they can be seen as petitions?
Laera: Since they thread started off with the title "Petition" rather than
as a "Suggestion", the moderation team saw it as a red flag. It
could have been an interesting discussion but the comments started
to derail the entire point of the poll. I'd advise them to create a
new thread as a suggestion rather than a petition. That way they
can gather feedback from the rest of the community and have a
healthy discussion.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5561985
KampfKopf, on Sep 24 2013 - 12:01, said: Does the new forum guidelines apply to WoWP as well as WoT, or will
there be 2 separate sets of guidelines for the forums of games
coming from the same parent company? If they apply to
both, then where's the posting of that info, as well as the reset
of warning points, at forum WoWP?
I would advise WG in not having different standards for these two forums as it goes against your goal of a "Unified Account" at the very least.
As well as the minor issue that people like to be treated equally, not so?
#535
ElvenLord, on Sep 24 2013 - 17:02, said: Since you are doing feedback here Laera...
Petitioning for additions to the game is now a moderator-able offense?
EXAMPLE:
http://forum.worldof...ld-type-59/#top
Does this mean that suggestions will also be moderated as technically they can be seen as petitions?
Link on message: #5561985
KampfKopf, on Sep 24 2013 - 12:01, said: Does the new forum guidelines apply to WoWP as well as WoT, or will
there be 2 separate sets of guidelines for the forums of games
coming from the same parent company? If they apply to
both, then where's the posting of that info, as well as the reset
of warning points, at forum WoWP?I would advise WG in not having different standards for these two forums as it goes against your goal of a "Unified Account" at the very least.
As well as the minor issue that people like to be treated equally, not so?
#535
Laera: We're working to move this new Community Guidelines and new
moderation standards over to the WoWP and 360 forums very soon.
ElvenLord, on Sep 24 2013 - 17:02, said: Since you are doing feedback here Laera...Petitioning for additions to the game is now a moderator-able offense?
EXAMPLE:
http://forum.worldof...ld-type-59/#top
Does this mean that suggestions will also be moderated as technically they can be seen as petitions?
Laera: Since they thread started off with the title "Petition" rather than
as a "Suggestion", the moderation team saw it as a red flag. It
could have been an interesting discussion but the comments started
to derail the entire point of the poll. I'd advise them to create a
new thread as a suggestion rather than a petition. That way they
can gather feedback from the rest of the community and have a
healthy discussion.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5561985
KampfKopf, on Sep 24 2013 - 12:01, said: Does the new forum guidelines apply to WoWP as well as WoT, or will
there be 2 separate sets of guidelines for the forums of games
coming from the same parent company? If they apply to
both, then where's the posting of that info, as well as the reset
of warning points, at forum WoWP?
I would advise WG in not having different standards for these two forums as it goes against your goal of a "Unified Account" at the very least.
As well as the minor issue that people like to be treated equally, not so?
#535
ElvenLord, on Sep 24 2013 - 17:02, said: Since you are doing feedback here Laera...
Petitioning for additions to the game is now a moderator-able offense?
EXAMPLE:
http://forum.worldof...ld-type-59/#top
Does this mean that suggestions will also be moderated as technically they can be seen as petitions?
Link on message: #5561985
KampfKopf, on Sep 24 2013 - 12:01, said: Does the new forum guidelines apply to WoWP as well as WoT, or will
there be 2 separate sets of guidelines for the forums of games
coming from the same parent company? If they apply to
both, then where's the posting of that info, as well as the reset
of warning points, at forum WoWP?I would advise WG in not having different standards for these two forums as it goes against your goal of a "Unified Account" at the very least.
As well as the minor issue that people like to be treated equally, not so?
#535
Laera: We're working to move this new Community Guidelines and new
moderation standards over to the WoWP and 360 forums very soon.
ElvenLord, on Sep 24 2013 - 17:02, said: Since you are doing feedback here Laera...Petitioning for additions to the game is now a moderator-able offense?
EXAMPLE:
http://forum.worldof...ld-type-59/#top
Does this mean that suggestions will also be moderated as technically they can be seen as petitions?
Laera: Since they thread started off with the title "Petition" rather than
as a "Suggestion", the moderation team saw it as a red flag. It
could have been an interesting discussion but the comments started
to derail the entire point of the poll. I'd advise them to create a
new thread as a suggestion rather than a petition. That way they
can gather feedback from the rest of the community and have a
healthy discussion.
Subject: Improving the Quality of Our Forums
Link on message: #5561985
KampfKopf, on Sep 24 2013 - 12:01, said: Does the new forum guidelines apply to WoWP as well as WoT, or will
there be 2 separate sets of guidelines for the forums of games
coming from the same parent company? If they apply to
both, then where's the posting of that info, as well as the reset
of warning points, at forum WoWP?
I would advise WG in not having different standards for these two forums as it goes against your goal of a "Unified Account" at the very least.
As well as the minor issue that people like to be treated equally, not so?
#535
ElvenLord, on Sep 24 2013 - 17:02, said: Since you are doing feedback here Laera...
Petitioning for additions to the game is now a moderator-able offense?
EXAMPLE:
http://forum.worldof...ld-type-59/#top
Does this mean that suggestions will also be moderated as technically they can be seen as petitions?
Link on message: #5561985
KampfKopf, on Sep 24 2013 - 12:01, said: Does the new forum guidelines apply to WoWP as well as WoT, or will
there be 2 separate sets of guidelines for the forums of games
coming from the same parent company? If they apply to
both, then where's the posting of that info, as well as the reset
of warning points, at forum WoWP?I would advise WG in not having different standards for these two forums as it goes against your goal of a "Unified Account" at the very least.
As well as the minor issue that people like to be treated equally, not so?
#535
Laera: We're working to move this new Community Guidelines and new
moderation standards over to the WoWP and 360 forums very soon.
ElvenLord, on Sep 24 2013 - 17:02, said: Since you are doing feedback here Laera...Petitioning for additions to the game is now a moderator-able offense?
EXAMPLE:
http://forum.worldof...ld-type-59/#top
Does this mean that suggestions will also be moderated as technically they can be seen as petitions?
Laera: Since they thread started off with the title "Petition" rather than
as a "Suggestion", the moderation team saw it as a red flag. It
could have been an interesting discussion but the comments started
to derail the entire point of the poll. I'd advise them to create a
new thread as a suggestion rather than a petition. That way they
can gather feedback from the rest of the community and have a
healthy discussion.
Subject: News and Announcements: Open League Championship Series, Fall 2013
Link on message: #5561421
Link on message: #5561421
dance210: REMINDER: The last day for all invited teams to register for the
Fall Season for the Open League is Thursday, September
26, 2013 by 4 pm PT.
Teams that have not been invited to the Open League are NOT allowed to register; all applications will be denied.
Teams that have not been invited to the Open League are NOT allowed to register; all applications will be denied.
Subject: News and Announcements: Minor League Championship Series, Fall 2013
Link on message: #5561412
Link on message: #5561412
dance210: REMINDER: The last day for all invited teams to register for the
Fall Season for the Minor League is Thursday, September
26, 2013 by 4 pm PT.
Teams that have not been invited to the Minor League are NOT allowed to register; all applications will be denied.
Teams that have not been invited to the Minor League are NOT allowed to register; all applications will be denied.
Subject: News and Announcements: Major League Championship Series, Fall 2013
Link on message: #5561401
Link on message: #5561401
dance210: REMINDER: The last day for all invited teams to register for the
Fall Season for the Major League is Thursday, September
26, 2013 by 4 pm PT.
Teams that have not been invited to the Major League are NOT allowed to register; all applications will be denied.
Teams that have not been invited to the Major League are NOT allowed to register; all applications will be denied.
Subject: Skirmish 37
Link on message: #5560779
creigo, on Sep 24 2013 - 16:52, said: the tournament page show's my team as having a by lastnight. now
its not showing us on the tournament page for todays
tournament can you tell me what is up with that???
Link on message: #5560779
creigo, on Sep 24 2013 - 16:52, said: the tournament page show's my team as having a by lastnight. now
its not showing us on the tournament page for todays
tournament can you tell me what is up with that???dance210: Bye's need to be dealt with manually. Have patience and we'll take
care of it :)
Реклама | Adv















