Developers posts on forum

Subject: CAMO BS
Link on message: #15137997

Bond90, on 13 December 2017 - 07:37 PM, said: So wargaming, when are you going to compensate all the gold difference on vehicle camo paints? i dont give a damn about this clown fiesta, but why the hell camo on tier 10s cost 50 gold a piece? when previously it was 250 a piece? 600 gold just for one tank is kind of a huge difference you know? i have 10 tier 10s currently and quite a few prems + other tanks that i enjoyed fitted with permanent camo purchased by gold before patch, ok asuming that some camos may have been purchased while on discount, divide the numbers by 2. even then only for tier 10s you *edit owe me 3750 gold at least, even though very few camos were purchased while on discount, not to mention other tanks. + i think that emblems where 100 gold before as well, so i guess fak me then and lot of other player s as well. 

Subject: Actualización 9.21: Nueva personalización de mecánicas
Link on message: #15137978

josesalle, on 14 December 2017 - 12:18 PM, said: ¿? Lo que aparece en el mantelete de ese carro es la enseña nacional y creo que no aparece en ningún caso nada que pueda reflejar si ha luchado en el bando golpista del 36.

Al margen de que se pueda o no hacer no veo porqué habría que reportar. Y lo digo desde un punto de vista totalmente apolítico. Simplemente me ha llamado la atención.

Subject: Facepalms incoming: WGs last Q&A.
Link on message: #15137904

Hadent, on 14 December 2017 - 12:02 PM, said: Arent you contradicting yourself a bit? Earlier you said: "When I'm talking about the data, I'm not talking only about the "hard" data (WR etc.), together with that we are taking in consideration your feedback from the forums and social media. We also listen to our influencers and we are running our own surveys via the game client." 


Kayi4ek, on 14 December 2017 - 10:42 AM, said: I said taking in consideration. I didn't say how we prioritize these aspects. And actually I'm really thankful for your post for some reasons.

Subject: Guía de las operaciones festivas 2018
Link on message: #15137899

Subject: Facepalms incoming: WGs last Q&A.
Link on message: #15137831

Snowjaguar, on 14 December 2017 - 11:24 AM, said:   You're missing the point entirely and it's partly my fault for quoting you badly, I apologize for that. You asked "If you want I can discuss with you from my player's perspective. Do you want me to do so?". My reply would be no, I don't think many here are interested in what you think as a player since the forums are full of just that. You've opened up the can as WGs spokesman and you've been called out for it. People want an official version and a good explanation what a representative meant which is a completely reasonable thing to want after statements like that.   So again, what's the up with those numbers showing the difference between your statistical data and the publically available ones with regards to Type 5 and the Leopard? And also, if you have no data, as one player mentioned a few pages back if you could buff the Object 907, how can you claim that you have no data when it comes to putting it back as it was from the start?  You need to back your words with something factual instead of speculations and what's many here rightfully so considers to be lies, you really do need to come clean and show those hard facts that you're claiming to have.


Gkirmathal, on 14 December 2017 - 11:35 AM, said: So, if you would do us a favor: share WG's data on those things you have proclaimed here and in the Q&A as being "all fine and not op/broken/balanced/etc" Only then people will start to believe it and start to believe Wargaming, their developers and producers again.

Subject: Actualización 9.21: Nueva personalización de mecánicas
Link on message: #15137784

bilkom, on 14 December 2017 - 10:02 AM, said: se puede pintar  así o es muy difícil?

Subject: Un regalo por vuestra lealtad
Link on message: #15137770

tioemo, on 13 December 2017 - 06:45 PM, said: Realmente si se comento,pero...tanto trabajo costaría poner ciertas cosas 'in game'??

Subject: Ofertas de diciembre en la tienda premium
Link on message: #15137739

Arl_x_Valencia_Uribe, on 14 December 2017 - 09:35 AM, said:   He iniciar de 0?, si me dejan pasar mi cuenta al servidor Latam me lo pensaría pero asi ni por mas aburrido que estuviese  

Subject: Concurso: Repeticiones épicas
Link on message: #15137732

Subject: Graphical BS after the update
Link on message: #15137595

Subject: Premium rounds ruining this game?
Link on message: #15137583

Subject: Klan RESIS-fuzja
Link on message: #15137478

Subject: Facepalms incoming: WGs last Q&A.
Link on message: #15137425

Stevie_Ray_Vaughan, on 14 December 2017 - 10:50 AM, said:   Try playing some CW, literally every game you run into a wall of Type 5's. I wonder why teams don' t pick Leo's.

Subject: Facepalms incoming: WGs last Q&A.
Link on message: #15137369

Snowjaguar, on 14 December 2017 - 10:20 AM, said: Thank you for the offer about think hearing your opinion as a player though. We're 99.9% players here and we all have our own story to tell and argue about.


Cobra6, on 14 December 2017 - 10:23 AM, said:   I'd like you, as a developer, to try and explain how the Type5 is fine and the Leopard is a good medium while looking at these statistics/facts.   Cobra 6


commer, on 14 December 2017 - 10:29 AM, said:   So basically you are not balancing the game with the use of hard data but listen forum feedback and social media? YOU ARE THE DEVELOPERS NOT THE PLAYERS you should be more qualified to make such decisions. Imagine carmakers made engineering decisions based on random mail they get. Cars would be amazing. Ffs. I'm an ex engineer and I used to work on some fancy full suspension bikes and companies who designed bikes that customers THOUGHT they wanted got screwed because they had bad bikes. The guys who listened to hard facts and data had good bikes their customers like despite not listening to them in the design process.    Reading the last part basically invalidates your first part. If being a developer is hard then why the hell do you listen to the uninformed massess? Also we all know that's a lie since you claim Defender is balanced (against TVP) or that Type5 is not a problem despite there being a huge outcry towards them from the community. So please decide if it's hard and you know better or you listen to the community. You can't have both. 

Subject: Kody promocyjne 2.0
Link on message: #15137205

Subject: Facepalms incoming: WGs last Q&A.
Link on message: #15137191

Kayi4ek, on 13 December 2017 - 05:42 PM, said:   I'm sorry if I sound condescending, but I didn't mean to. We are going through huge rebalancing process right now and the "butterfly effect" is something we have to encounter. I would like to say the things you want to hear, but unfortunately I can't for now.    Game development and balance might seem easy (I thought the same before I joined dev team), but the complexity of the game is making it really hard. Our goal, as development team, is to continue with the process and provide fun for our players. But we have to take look at the game as a whole, which can be difficult to understand. As I said before, this was really huge change for me, because I had to throw away my subjective point of view. The thing is that we are making game for the players all around the world and feedback or requirements from the players might be different.   When I'm talking about the data, I'm not talking only about the "hard" data (WR etc.), together with that we are taking in consideration your feedback from the forums and social media. We also listen to our influencers and we are running our own surveys via the game client. 

Subject: Geschenktes Besatzungsmitglied
Link on message: #15137071

Subject: [Live] The Final Battle Begins!
Link on message: #15137037

Deadoks, on 14 December 2017 - 06:19 AM, said: 1. We don't know the player.
- On LoL we (learn to) know each player and their play, we sometime meet them on random 2. The game(play) team vs team is not like random, sono identification of the game we play against the game they play. - On LoL we play the same game, same champions on the same "map"... It's easier to identify your play versus their play and learn from them. 3. The commentators are "boring" as hell and have nothing to give us. We don"t know them, they lack of personality so nothing to make us want to listen and watch them. - On LoL we know Sjokz (ahhhh gril), Deficio, Phreak (tons of damage),... and much more. They make the show and they're interesting to listen too. THEY put the magic to make us want to see the stream and look the game, THEY give stories about the player and their lives and so..

Subject: Waiting for ticktes reply or resolving more then 24 hours...
Link on message: #15136981

Subject: Wg et son matchmaking
Link on message: #15136874

Subject: Daily Tournaments - Information & Updates
Link on message: #15134948

Subject: Terminal greed, or adieu camouflage
Link on message: #15134733

brumbarr, on 13 December 2017 - 04:52 PM, said:   No you dont,  do you even think? The separate parts are much cheaper than the old camo was. 
  The new options are all much cheaper, 75K credits is way cheaper than it used to be,  if you buy permanent camo just to get the bonus its also cheaper. The only more expensive options  are jsut cosmetic, which is fine and a good businesmodel instead of bringin out OP prems.
 


Homer_J, on 13 December 2017 - 05:56 PM, said:   It appears the new ones bought for gold can be moved from one tank to another which IMO is a great improvement.  I've gold camo'd a few keepers in the past and then decided I didn't want to keep them after all.

Subject: Torneo Navideño 2017
Link on message: #15134604

Subject: ¿Por que este "maltrato" a nuestro servidor? (ofertas, precios, promos)
Link on message: #15134487

DarkSkeletor, on 13 December 2017 - 05:54 PM, said: Pues mirando por el foro ruso me decidí a echarle un ojo a su tienda premium. https://ru.wargaming...p/wot/specials/   Me encuentro esto:     Y en la nuestra da risa. Es por que el juego es de Bielorrusia?

Subject: Actualización 9.21: Nueva personalización de mecánicas
Link on message: #15134461

makagoento, on 13 December 2017 - 04:52 PM, said:   De momento el rosa no lo encuentro, sólo color morado. Cuanta animadversión por el rosa...

Subject: Un regalo por vuestra lealtad
Link on message: #15134457

Molotock, on 13 December 2017 - 04:51 PM, said:      Vaya tela, he perdido la tripulante femenina. Esto se avisó? Últimamente las actualizaciones solo me traen disgustos.

Subject: Update 9.21 - General Feedback
Link on message: #15134455

none666, on 13 December 2017 - 05:50 PM, said: I cant find how can you get camo for credits too

Subject: Facepalms incoming: WGs last Q&A.
Link on message: #15134377

BicycleOfDeath, on 13 December 2017 - 03:38 PM, said:   My man, thank you for coming in here and answering questions first of all. But you are not coming off too well. I'm sure you are a nice dude but you sounds defensive and condescending.    For example you say you need enough data. But there are many many unbalanced vehicles that have been like that for years. Surely you can experiment and test without several years of data and make a decision? Why does it take such a long time? I guess we'll never get an answer to that, as I imagine it's just not a priority for Wargaming. Personally I would be happy to not have any minigames, other modes and so on in exchange for balance fixes. Take that minigame dev team and put them on real balance if that's possible. Good luck and thanks for listening. 

Subject: L’aggiornamento 9.21 è arrivato!
Link on message: #15134212

Subject: Update 9.21 - General Feedback
Link on message: #15133939

Deathincookie, on 13 December 2017 - 01:52 PM, said: Now camouflage is for gold? Seriously?!?! I always paint my tanks and put my countries flag on, and for game money it was fine..but now I have to by them for real money?!?! that's sucks, that's really sucks..I have 16 tanks and everytime they get lvl up I have to spent 2400+ gold?!?! Not worth it. I'm a premium client for a year now and considering not to be anymore..


Berto72, on 13 December 2017 - 01:59 PM, said: "Over the past couple of months, many of you have been affected by chat, friends list, and other issues that may have spoiled your enjoyment in World of Tanks. We now have those issues under control but will continue to monitor the situation closely, especially after the release of Update "


lolomantasss, on 13 December 2017 - 02:27 PM, said: camo system teling that "3% Bonus to concealment when applying the camouflage to a vehicles hull", so if i apply it on the gun barrel ill get total of 6%???


gdrulia, on 13 December 2017 - 03:40 PM, said: Still having sound issues! In the middle of the battle only the right side in the headphones is playing sound from the game and at something like half sound or less. Seen this reported previously, was expecting this to be fixed, alas.
No, there is no mods, vanilla client.
No headphones is not at fault, music playing in the mean time was still playing just fine on both sides.   Edit: Once it starts, it disappears when you come back to garage, but then reappears in every battle. Have to restarts client to solve the issue.

Subject: Problem z fps w World of tanks.
Link on message: #15133928

Subject: Games I have finished
Link on message: #15133909

Subject: Games I didn't finnish
Link on message: #15133890

Subject: Ou retrouver son équipage féminin du T28 HTC ?
Link on message: #15133848

Subject: Suggestion Matchamaking
Link on message: #15133811

Subject: Personal Mission/Chat issues Update and Compensation
Link on message: #15133668

Long_Range_Sniper, on 13 December 2017 - 02:23 PM, said:  

Subject: Retours concernant les bugs 9.21
Link on message: #15133609

Subject: Stream navideño WoT con DelhRoh & Invitados
Link on message: #15133493

Subject: Un regalo por vuestra lealtad
Link on message: #15133479

rocannrol, on 13 December 2017 - 01:19 PM, said:   Puede que tengas razón y se explica en el texto, pero el titulo dice regalo, "Un regalo por vuestra lealtad" Pero analicemos las dos palabras, veamos que dice la RAE Regalo: de regalar Dádiva que se hace voluntariamente o por costumbre. Compensar (o compensación): Igualar en opuesto sentido el efecto de una cosa con el de otra. Aquí en este caso deberíamos buscar también la palabra igualar. igualar: Hacer iguales a dos o más personas o cosas en cualidades o valor. Una vez aclarado que no es un regalo. Analicemos si es una compensación, se supone que se compensa al usuario por unas molestias, pero en este caso,  el usuario, (la mayoría) consideran que no es proporcional, es decir no se considera compensado (igualado) por lo tanto se produce una discrepancia entre el valor que WG da a la incidencia y la que le da el cliente que considera que ha salido perjudicado en ese intercambio. Yo os digo, no es para dar ni un tanque Premium, ni un elefante rosa, pero 1 día Premium? por Dios es ridículo¡¡ es lo mismo que dais por dejarnos unas horas sin servidor, cuando se produce una actualización, y no creo que estar un mes o más con incidencias del juego, sea lo mismo. Creo que lo que habéis dado en algún otro servidor,  creo que 7 días Premium habría estado más en concordancia. Y no digo por mi, yo pago siempre cuenta Premium, y no tengo problemas, simplemente defiendo algo que creo justo.
 

Subject: Actualización 9.21: Nueva personalización de mecánicas
Link on message: #15133474

BaltazarWoll, on 13 December 2017 - 12:47 PM, said: No tengo ni idea de como pintar el tanque de colores chillones. No lo voy a usar, pero sólo por probar, ¿alguien puede explicar cómo se hace?   EDIT: Vale, he visto que sólo para premiums de tier VIII y X