Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Mobile Bunker: the Chrysler K
Link on message: #16645274
Geno1isme, on 12 February 2019 - 02:55 PM, said: That's a funny statement. Back in 2014 when one could
actually earn gold in CW somewhat reliably most premium tanks were
actually available permanently for gold. Notable exceptions were
preorder tanks and Type 59 (there may have been a few more, but not
many). Apparently around that time you realized that you were
giving out too much gold "for free". As a result gold income was
reduced significantly across the board (CW 2.0, tournaments,
missions, ...) while at the same time premium tanks were removed
from the techtree. Also you started to release T8 premiums at a
massive rate, sold only in time-limited bundles in the cash shop.
Now over time you've been told (e.g. Cyprus meeting) that the
community strongly dislikes that practice, so in recent years
you've slightly reversed both trends, though we're still far away
from the original state. Btw, this whole
selling-tanks-in-bundles-for-cash agenda is also a source of many
issues for you. If you'd simplify it down to full "cash buys gold,
gold buys content" you wouldn't have all these issues with gold
compensation or discount multiplications and therefore wouldn't
need to make all those special cases to minimize such exploits. You
could save resources in support and probably have a lot more
satisified customers at the same time. But I guess that all
pales in comparison to a happy marketing department (due to
inventing fancy offers) and some quick cash influx.
Link on message: #16645274
Geno1isme, on 12 February 2019 - 02:55 PM, said: That's a funny statement. Back in 2014 when one could
actually earn gold in CW somewhat reliably most premium tanks were
actually available permanently for gold. Notable exceptions were
preorder tanks and Type 59 (there may have been a few more, but not
many). Apparently around that time you realized that you were
giving out too much gold "for free". As a result gold income was
reduced significantly across the board (CW 2.0, tournaments,
missions, ...) while at the same time premium tanks were removed
from the techtree. Also you started to release T8 premiums at a
massive rate, sold only in time-limited bundles in the cash shop.
Now over time you've been told (e.g. Cyprus meeting) that the
community strongly dislikes that practice, so in recent years
you've slightly reversed both trends, though we're still far away
from the original state. Btw, this whole
selling-tanks-in-bundles-for-cash agenda is also a source of many
issues for you. If you'd simplify it down to full "cash buys gold,
gold buys content" you wouldn't have all these issues with gold
compensation or discount multiplications and therefore wouldn't
need to make all those special cases to minimize such exploits. You
could save resources in support and probably have a lot more
satisified customers at the same time. But I guess that all
pales in comparison to a happy marketing department (due to
inventing fancy offers) and some quick cash influx.eekeeboo: This all comes down to the fact marketing and packaging of
products to make them more appealing isn't that simple. If you see
bundled offers being hugely popular and a best seller/performer vs
those items with just a tank then the incentive is reduced. There's
a stage when you can't argue with the numbers and people may not
like bundled content and we can give all the feedback from the
community there is on it, but if more people are buying it and it's
making money then there's nothing else to be done until the numbers
reflect the feedback. Same as the issue with premiums
in the tech tree, I remember this and how it was easy to buy tanks
with gold, but at the same time, I remember as a player the
statement made then that WG made less money because people hoarded
gold and would stockpile without spending money etc. The aim of any
company wanting to stay in business is to encourage and entice you
into separating with your money where possible and to make it as
attractive as possible. My personal feelings and opinions aside,
this is how it is, for right or wrong.
Subject: Frontline: Meet the Rental Tanks
Link on message: #16645260
Hammerhead20, on 12 February 2019 - 02:28 PM, said: It's sad that T-44-100 for 250,000 credits comes with 75% crew...
I've tried to use my T-34-85's crew but it gives nothing
else but penalty "bonus"...
Link on message: #16645260
Hammerhead20, on 12 February 2019 - 02:28 PM, said: It's sad that T-44-100 for 250,000 credits comes with 75% crew...
I've tried to use my T-34-85's crew but it gives nothing
else but penalty "bonus"...eekeeboo: As highlighted above, only premium tanks have this function,
this vehicle is intended to be more for those who have no tier 8
tech tree vehicle available.
Subject: Mobile Bunker: the Chrysler K
Link on message: #16645249
xXK4L1NXx, on 12 February 2019 - 01:52 PM, said: You do realise that most of that gold goes out to the 'privileged'
unicorns and the occasional aimbot mod user, right? A system where
people could earn a certain amount of gold based on a skill that
couldn't be reliably reproduced by any mod and also available to
no-clan players would seem fair, but this...this is just another
one of WG's schemes wrapped neatly in some freebie gift paper
CyberRage, on 12 February 2019 - 01:54 PM, said: Gullible people that need something for frontline and have
no idea how bad this thing is, although still not as bad as
premiums from the ingame shop for gold. Actual good /
borderline OP premium tanks like Type 59 and Defender are only sold
through gambling. 13:55 Added after 0 minutes Why should
paying customers be penalized because you are giving away masses of
gold for free to 0.1% of the player base?
Cobra6, on 12 February 2019 - 02:14 PM, said: Why should we as paying customers however pay for the
mistake Wargaming made (shooting themselves in the foot) by making
gold earn-able in CW's? Additionally, if people earn gold in
CW's and invest a ton of time, why should they not be able to spend
this gold on offers in the premium shop/premium tanks not available
in the ingame-shop? Cobra 6
Link on message: #16645249
xXK4L1NXx, on 12 February 2019 - 01:52 PM, said: You do realise that most of that gold goes out to the 'privileged'
unicorns and the occasional aimbot mod user, right? A system where
people could earn a certain amount of gold based on a skill that
couldn't be reliably reproduced by any mod and also available to
no-clan players would seem fair, but this...this is just another
one of WG's schemes wrapped neatly in some freebie gift papereekeeboo: There is a lot of gold to higher level players, but at the
same time, these people also tend to be the ones who spend an
absolutely monstrous amount of credits in every battle. But there's
also a fair bit of gold given out over time to other clans and
players.
CyberRage, on 12 February 2019 - 01:54 PM, said: Gullible people that need something for frontline and have
no idea how bad this thing is, although still not as bad as
premiums from the ingame shop for gold. Actual good /
borderline OP premium tanks like Type 59 and Defender are only sold
through gambling. 13:55 Added after 0 minutes Why should
paying customers be penalized because you are giving away masses of
gold for free to 0.1% of the player base?eekeeboo: Why should paying customers be penalized because you are
giving away masses of gold for free to 0.1% of the player base?
The people who play in Frontlines are also paying customers.
It is ill-advised to put your premium and items you sell for "real
money" into a store people can buy from by using in-game play time.
You need to ensure you keep content exclusive to the store or
people stop visiting or going to your store.
Cobra6, on 12 February 2019 - 02:14 PM, said: Why should we as paying customers however pay for the
mistake Wargaming made (shooting themselves in the foot) by making
gold earn-able in CW's? Additionally, if people earn gold in
CW's and invest a ton of time, why should they not be able to spend
this gold on offers in the premium shop/premium tanks not available
in the ingame-shop? Cobra 6eekeeboo: Gold isn't only available in CW, it's available throughout
in various amounts through events and contests and occasionally
codes. In the same way, people earn full premium tanks potentially
for free or at a discount. As highlighted above, there has to be a
stage in which you don't put everything you have into a store
people can buy from by not putting real money in, or people stop
going to the store for real money. Those people who earn the gold
in CW tend to spend it far more liberally on the systems currently
in the game.
Subject: All About Frontline 2019
Link on message: #16645237
Trevissz, on 12 February 2019 - 02:12 PM, said: 1 prestige ponint after 16 hour gamming. WTF?
Link on message: #16645237
Trevissz, on 12 February 2019 - 02:12 PM, said: 1 prestige ponint after 16 hour gamming. WTF? eekeeboo: It states in the frontline personal over-view screen: "Reach
tier 30 to increase your Prestige".
Subject: Soldiers of Fortune: An Update on Compensation
Link on message: #16645230
Zmago5000, on 12 February 2019 - 01:34 PM, said: eekeebo: When discount on premiums Tier 8 for gold? Not willing
spending gold for rent for FL,....rather buy.
Link on message: #16645230
Zmago5000, on 12 February 2019 - 01:34 PM, said: eekeebo: When discount on premiums Tier 8 for gold? Not willing
spending gold for rent for FL,....rather buy.eekeeboo: I can't give you those details unfortunately, when I/we can
announce these discounts, they will be made available on the
website.
Subject: Mobile Bunker: the Chrysler K
Link on message: #16645016
HeatBouncer, on 12 February 2019 - 01:28 PM, said: Technically 'buy' gold not earn.
Link on message: #16645016
HeatBouncer, on 12 February 2019 - 01:28 PM, said: Technically 'buy' gold not earn.eekeeboo: Clanwars is a particular reference for one instance.
Subject: WoT Community Contributor Program
Link on message: #16645008
Jam_in_a_Tank_TwitchTv, on 11 February 2019 - 09:33 PM, said: Hello sir, I was looking for further info according
to community contributors, mainly where to submit my
entry according to that ? Apart from this if there is anything more
to discuss or ask for further info who shall i contact ?
Thank you for your time, Jam_in_a_Tank
Link on message: #16645008
Jam_in_a_Tank_TwitchTv, on 11 February 2019 - 09:33 PM, said: Hello sir, I was looking for further info according
to community contributors, mainly where to submit my
entry according to that ? Apart from this if there is anything more
to discuss or ask for further info who shall i contact ?
Thank you for your time, Jam_in_a_Tank eekeeboo: Hello, the situation remains the same as last while the
Contributor program is evolved and streamlines the number of
openings is minimal for actual CC status whereas lower ranks can be
achieved as you generate higher numbers etc.
Subject: All About Frontline 2019
Link on message: #16644998
AngryBot365, on 12 February 2019 - 12:40 PM, said: To get the tier IX tank we will gonna need to play 90-120 hours per
week??? because it's written that you need prestige X+15... So We
will gonna need to finish the last week and make 6x30? o.O
Link on message: #16644998
AngryBot365, on 12 February 2019 - 12:40 PM, said: To get the tier IX tank we will gonna need to play 90-120 hours per
week??? because it's written that you need prestige X+15... So We
will gonna need to finish the last week and make 6x30? o.O eekeeboo: Don't forget that FL is available once a week a
month.
Subject: Best Vehicles for the Frontline Mode
Link on message: #16644996
Sapphire89, on 11 February 2019 - 10:16 PM, said: Why can’t I use the WZ-120-1G FT ??
Link on message: #16644996
Sapphire89, on 11 February 2019 - 10:16 PM, said: Why can’t I use the WZ-120-1G FT ??eekeeboo: Have you made sure the crew is fully trained on it? If not
can you please send a screenshot?
Subject: Premium Shop: Frontline Champions
Link on message: #16644993
Bynk_hero, on 12 February 2019 - 07:18 AM, said: Scorpion G its good, but after shoot im visible for everyone and
that suck, but if i shot with Rusian Scorp, nobody sees me after
shot, how to? :-)
Link on message: #16644993
Bynk_hero, on 12 February 2019 - 07:18 AM, said: Scorpion G its good, but after shoot im visible for everyone and
that suck, but if i shot with Rusian Scorp, nobody sees me after
shot, how to? :-) eekeeboo: Try to use the bush camo mechanic to fire without being
spotted and don't be in vision range of lights when you make a big
bang noise!
Subject: Soldiers of Fortune: An Update on Compensation
Link on message: #16644982
Psticide, on 11 February 2019 - 10:47 PM, said: not banning cheaters and not cleaning them from the rankings before
rewards are handed out will also lead to a loss of money 
____Green____, on 12 February 2019 - 08:59 AM, said: Huh
Here we go. If WG loses their money - problem will be
fixed in few hrs. If WG forget to fix safety bug on biggest clan
event in history of game - not a big deal. eeeeek
pls give us update - this issue will be fixed for next
cw season or campaign? I know you can! At least I hope You can

alion_hero, on 12 February 2019 - 10:33 AM, said: sometimes silence is an answer...no further comments PS: eek what
did I told you before campaign start...another broken
event 
Link on message: #16644982
Psticide, on 11 February 2019 - 10:47 PM, said: not banning cheaters and not cleaning them from the rankings before
rewards are handed out will also lead to a loss of money eekeeboo: How is this considering the items were provided for
free?
____Green____, on 12 February 2019 - 08:59 AM, said: Huh eekeeboo: It's common business practice. You fix the biggest, highest
priority and damaging things first. How can I give you an
update? The latest campaign has not been fully finalised and
finished yet before plans are made for the next. 13:23 Added
after 0 minutes
alion_hero, on 12 February 2019 - 10:33 AM, said: sometimes silence is an answer...no further comments PS: eek what
did I told you before campaign start...another broken
event eekeeboo: Silence how? I answer as many people in as many areas as
possible. But I am not a personal google for people in one thread
of the forums. You say it was a broken event, but with more people
taking part than ever before, I'm not sure where your evidence for
this basis is?
Subject: Referral Program 2.0: The Finishing Touches
Link on message: #16644974
Jumping_Turtle, on 11 February 2019 - 09:53 PM, said: And you really think that isnt happening ? Seen a few
already on the forum who are already done with the 3 stages. This
resetting the progress is just good for the alt acount people since
they will have no problem getting there in time, but in the
meantime it is punishing those who are new and can not play every
day.
KingPellefant, on 11 February 2019 - 10:22 PM, said:
L3gionaire, on 12 February 2019 - 11:18 AM, said: Wee need a statement from the moderators if the program has bugs
unresolved: The reward camouflage cannot be seen by the
players who finished the stages. This reward camouflage
cannot be found by players in the exterior section. Thank
you
Link on message: #16644974
Jumping_Turtle, on 11 February 2019 - 09:53 PM, said: And you really think that isnt happening ? Seen a few
already on the forum who are already done with the 3 stages. This
resetting the progress is just good for the alt acount people since
they will have no problem getting there in time, but in the
meantime it is punishing those who are new and can not play every
day.eekeeboo: I didn't say it wasn't happening, but in the context of what
I said, it's less likely to happen.
KingPellefant, on 11 February 2019 - 10:22 PM, said: eekeeboo: Do you mean ALL of the articles, blog posts and multiple
bumps of the program ending? There was as much notice given as
possible, months in fact, but no matter what you can't inform
everyone because even an email, someone would complain because of
junk filter and we should call you on the phone.
L3gionaire, on 12 February 2019 - 11:18 AM, said: Wee need a statement from the moderators if the program has bugs
unresolved: The reward camouflage cannot be seen by the
players who finished the stages. This reward camouflage
cannot be found by players in the exterior section. Thank
youeekeeboo: The moderators moderate the forums, bugs need to be reported
in the feedback thread or via support (more advised) with
screenshots and a breakdown.
Subject: Frontline: Meet the Rental Tanks
Link on message: #16644962
legendkiller16, on 11 February 2019 - 07:33 PM, said: I cant buy anything for the Frontilne mode... I cant access the
levels or anything, its stuck at loading content....
Link on message: #16644962
legendkiller16, on 11 February 2019 - 07:33 PM, said: I cant buy anything for the Frontilne mode... I cant access the
levels or anything, its stuck at loading content....eekeeboo: Can you try now that the servers aren't quite as full? Or
make sure you're running an unmodded client.
Subject: Matchmaker Tweaks: Next Steps
Link on message: #16644953
AFerence, on 12 February 2019 - 09:44 AM, said: Sorry but I think there is a difference between the reality
what is toled to us and that is the reason to this MM. The reason
presented to us is the short queue time, but I am convinced that
the real reason is the paying customers. WG rewards the paying
customer with better MM and better RNG. I know is hard to prove
this, but this does not block me to have this opinion. So if you
want to be a better player in WoT you just to have to spend more
money
. Is that simple this is a pay to win game. Being good
in a pay to win game does not only shows that you spent enough
money. Much bigger companies/publishers (Blizzard, EA Sports) work
in this way. For them killing a game by simply being greedy is not
a problem since they have other ones. Since the only real success
of WG is WoT, killing this game may also mean the end of WG as
well.
Link on message: #16644953
AFerence, on 12 February 2019 - 09:44 AM, said: Sorry but I think there is a difference between the reality
what is toled to us and that is the reason to this MM. The reason
presented to us is the short queue time, but I am convinced that
the real reason is the paying customers. WG rewards the paying
customer with better MM and better RNG. I know is hard to prove
this, but this does not block me to have this opinion. So if you
want to be a better player in WoT you just to have to spend more
money eekeeboo: You may be convinced, that doesn't mean it's fact. And no,
there is no different MM to paying vs non-paying customers, or
better RNG, this is tinfoil sales propaganda at its finest. I can't
stop you from trying to use the worlds supply of tinfoil on such
things, but I must point out it's not true.
Subject: Mobile Bunker: the Chrysler K
Link on message: #16644938
Cobra6, on 12 February 2019 - 01:01 PM, said: Yes and no though, for those of us that have been around for
a long time and unlocked most the tanks they want to unlock, the
only thing to spend gold on is premium accounts and crew
retraining/equipment demounting. I currently have 52K gold
due to the Christmas loot boxes and literally nothing to spend it
on as the only premium tanks I don't already have and want to have
are not available in the game. Therefore it would be
beneficial to WG to make sure that any offer they make for the
premium shop, they also make available for in game gold. Much like
Armored Warfare got instantly right, in that game you can choose,
even on the website, to pay for the offers either with money or in
game gold. Cobra 6
Link on message: #16644938
Cobra6, on 12 February 2019 - 01:01 PM, said: Yes and no though, for those of us that have been around for
a long time and unlocked most the tanks they want to unlock, the
only thing to spend gold on is premium accounts and crew
retraining/equipment demounting. I currently have 52K gold
due to the Christmas loot boxes and literally nothing to spend it
on as the only premium tanks I don't already have and want to have
are not available in the game. Therefore it would be
beneficial to WG to make sure that any offer they make for the
premium shop, they also make available for in game gold. Much like
Armored Warfare got instantly right, in that game you can choose,
even on the website, to pay for the offers either with money or in
game gold. Cobra 6eekeeboo: This has been suggested and tanks are rotated, but it's also
good to note that AW didn't have systems in place where people
could earn a lot of gold at the same time.
Subject: Microparche 1.4_1.2
Link on message: #16644674
Link on message: #16644674
Delhroh: Saludos, Mañana, 13 de febrero, habrá un microparche y los
servidores no estarán disponibles unos 25 minutos entre las 05:30
CET. El servidor 1 no estará disponible a las 06:00 CET y
el Servidor 2 no estará disponible a las 06:30 CET. Notas del
parche: Arreglo de varios problemas técnicos relacionados con
el programa de reclutamiento. ¡A rodar!
Subject: Problemas detectados en el modo "Línea del frente"
Link on message: #16644663
Link on message: #16644663
Delhroh: Saludos, coamandantes, Hemos encontrado dos problemas en el
modo Línea del Frente: Crashes pasados unos minutos después de
unirte a la batalla; Desaparición del tabulador de la munición
después del respawn en batalla. Algunos jugadores están tenido
problemas con varios mods. Habrá un microparche que reseteará la
carpeta de mods. Si tienes mods, actualizalos o descarga la última
versión. El microparche tuvo lugar hoy, 12 de Febrero, a las
04:00 y 04:45 de la mañana.
Subject: Mobile Bunker: the Chrysler K
Link on message: #16644600
_b_, on 12 February 2019 - 08:34 AM, said: Logs into game and opens notifications, then techtree ...and again
not able to buy anything for gold bought with money ..so again...
#walletclosed. Just what is the point of gold and stuff like
xmas lootboxes if we can't spend it? ...one or the other WG ... not
both! So until I've either spent my gold...or next xmas if
calendar again lets us get vehicles in-game with gold... I'll hold
on to my money and spend it elsewhere 
DSP37, on 12 February 2019 - 09:17 AM, said: Who would buy this? It will only fight T10 all the time and won't
be able to penetrate anything.
Cro006, on 12 February 2019 - 09:32 AM, said: Well, Skill made an video saying this tank has OP armor for
frontlines (and he did say that it's shlt in randoms) so there you
go. It's just as when QB wanted to gift Progetto to one player and
day after that Progetto got on sale. WG's employees watch their
streams and YT videos 
Link on message: #16644600
_b_, on 12 February 2019 - 08:34 AM, said: Logs into game and opens notifications, then techtree ...and again
not able to buy anything for gold bought with money ..so again...
#walletclosed. Just what is the point of gold and stuff like
xmas lootboxes if we can't spend it? ...one or the other WG ... not
both! So until I've either spent my gold...or next xmas if
calendar again lets us get vehicles in-game with gold... I'll hold
on to my money and spend it elsewhere eekeeboo: You have options to spend it throughout the game too,
including xp conversion and camo!
DSP37, on 12 February 2019 - 09:17 AM, said: Who would buy this? It will only fight T10 all the time and won't
be able to penetrate anything.eekeeboo: It fights other tiers too and is in time to highlight the
playing in Frontlines where you will see tier 8.
Cro006, on 12 February 2019 - 09:32 AM, said: Well, Skill made an video saying this tank has OP armor for
frontlines (and he did say that it's shlt in randoms) so there you
go. It's just as when QB wanted to gift Progetto to one player and
day after that Progetto got on sale. WG's employees watch their
streams and YT videos eekeeboo: I watch a lot of streams and videos and keep an eye on a lot
of areas, but these offers are made a long time in advance
Subject: Preguntas/Respuestas del Staff (Especiales, Tienda Premium...)
Link on message: #16644583
JaviTanke, on 08 February 2019 - 02:27 PM, said: A mi me ocurrió exactamente lo mismo y fue un visto y no
visto, es decir salio el pop-up o aviso o lo que fuera y después de
haberlo hecho ya no aparecía por ningún lado. 
fp97, on 10 February 2019 - 05:25 PM, said: Se prevé a corto plazo (1 año) perseguir y acabar, insisto en
acabar, con aquellas cuentas cargadas de chetos?.
Personalmente considero que WG como empresa, llegaría a mucha
más gente (y con ello pasta) si purgara de una vez los servidores,
pero me da que este juego seguirá como desde hace años, hasta
arriba de hez.
Link on message: #16644583
JaviTanke, on 08 February 2019 - 02:27 PM, said: A mi me ocurrió exactamente lo mismo y fue un visto y no
visto, es decir salio el pop-up o aviso o lo que fuera y después de
haberlo hecho ya no aparecía por ningún lado. Delhroh: Saludos, como he dicho anteriormente, te ruego envies un
ticket a soporte para que te solucionen el problema.
fp97, on 10 February 2019 - 05:25 PM, said: Se prevé a corto plazo (1 año) perseguir y acabar, insisto en
acabar, con aquellas cuentas cargadas de chetos?.
Personalmente considero que WG como empresa, llegaría a mucha
más gente (y con ello pasta) si purgara de una vez los servidores,
pero me da que este juego seguirá como desde hace años, hasta
arriba de hez. Delhroh: Sigue habiendo oleadas de sanciones cada cierto tiempo. Las
oleadas seguirán llegando y seguiremos sancionando cuentas. Ya van
varios miles de cuentas cerradas en el servidor europeo 
Subject: Frontlinie: Die Mietpanzer
Link on message: #16644322
Wolfshetze, on 11 February 2019 - 10:46 AM, said: Na dann hoffe mal, dass Deine Teamkollegen Dich nicht
vollflamen, wenn Du mit einem Stockpanzer ins Spiel kommst.
Link on message: #16644322
Wolfshetze, on 11 February 2019 - 10:46 AM, said: Na dann hoffe mal, dass Deine Teamkollegen Dich nicht
vollflamen, wenn Du mit einem Stockpanzer ins Spiel kommst.thePhilX: Gestern erfolgreich General mit meinem Tiger II geworden.
Frontline sollte Spaß für alle und Flame für keinen sein 
Subject: Chatbanned for..?
Link on message: #16642628
Link on message: #16642628
eekeeboo: Boop of Nope! Forum rules explain why!
Subject: Update 1.4 Personal Mission changes
Link on message: #16642505
SupremeMaster, on 08 February 2019 - 01:37 AM, said: WG needs to really change some of the highest tier missions after
this patch. Why you may ask ? Because with the wheeled vehicles you
just decreased the total hp pool in the game and these things are
really hard to hit if you are using something like a jageroo or any
big gun. I am not even adding the danger factor that these tanks
add with their mobility against slow non turreted TDs.
Link on message: #16642505
SupremeMaster, on 08 February 2019 - 01:37 AM, said: WG needs to really change some of the highest tier missions after
this patch. Why you may ask ? Because with the wheeled vehicles you
just decreased the total hp pool in the game and these things are
really hard to hit if you are using something like a jageroo or any
big gun. I am not even adding the danger factor that these tanks
add with their mobility against slow non turreted TDs.eekeeboo: Missions are constantly monitored and rebalanced based on
the level of completion by players.
Subject: Soldiers of Fortune: An Update on Compensation
Link on message: #16642493
____Green____, on 11 February 2019 - 10:58 AM, said: This is funny
We all know answer - curvehands.dll
AR was v.1.0.1 SoF was v.1.0.3 So turns out that
curvehands.dll starts on patch v1.0.2 Just
remember how fast wg reacted when on first wargames accidently
added 0.5M+ gold to accounts. Almost in 8 hrs all acc's was blocked
and rollbacks was committed. In this case not a big deal, WG create
event where rules is in conflict with the features available in the
game. Support cant answer, officials pretend there is no
technical issues. Tnx all for answers.
Link on message: #16642493
____Green____, on 11 February 2019 - 10:58 AM, said: This is funny eekeeboo: If the bug leads to a loss of money, any company fixes those
over a bug that is an inconvenience in only a select circumstance
in a very minor way.
Subject: Referral Program 2.0: The Finishing Touches
Link on message: #16642488
Jumping_Turtle, on 11 February 2019 - 01:41 PM, said: But that isnt very motivating for the new players we
recruit. And getting 1500 points for the tank isnt that easy for
the more casual newer player. So it is gonna be 'well sorry but you
didnt make the 1500 points so all progress is lost and you can kiss
you free tank goodbye' but we have good news, starting tomorrow you
can just make a new acount and try again ... How many
players do you think will stay when they get that message ?
Link on message: #16642488
Jumping_Turtle, on 11 February 2019 - 01:41 PM, said: But that isnt very motivating for the new players we
recruit. And getting 1500 points for the tank isnt that easy for
the more casual newer player. So it is gonna be 'well sorry but you
didnt make the 1500 points so all progress is lost and you can kiss
you free tank goodbye' but we have good news, starting tomorrow you
can just make a new acount and try again ... How many
players do you think will stay when they get that message ?eekeeboo: The points are earned faster than the requirements for the
last referral program with a lot more rewards. Without a goal and
deadline, people can happily just leave progression forever and
recruit alts. That's not the intention of this program, to instead
help people recruit friends who can be active and reward
them.
Subject: Matchmaker Tweaks: Next Steps
Link on message: #16642475
_Zenon, on 11 February 2019 - 02:12 PM, said: Firs part is wrong - in fact the game design must consider the
fun you achieve playing that game and when you are slaughter is no
fun or when you slaughter.
Second part is ok and with fun that we should get when we play the game i consider it will take us to that necessary skilled balanced MM.
I can give you a example- diablo 3 has died after hard core players ask blizz to shut down AH. They have listen those and they have been only 25% from all d3 players- now they remained with them because almost all players quit..
The same mistakes will be here too - WG will listen pro players that they dont want skilled ballance and they will remain with them because all occasional players all medium weak players will leave day by day and i dont think more than 30% players have more than 50% Wr.
I can give you another example - Poe - they earn money not like WG because players became frustrated and buy p2w items to get better but contrary they pay GG because they have done a great job with that game. In a perfect world with smart developers WOT should the POE road not D3 road, they should listen all those zillion thread where people ask them to ballance players regarding skill at the end of template.
Anyway i have seen many games buried by the fact that devs dont listen community and i meant the big part of comunity not hard core players, and it wont be the last one.
Someone has a point here -in 8 years they could not understand what is about with this mm why they will do it now , if they don't implement this now , later will be impossible since game bleed players and they will not have this big pool of players to try that,
My advice is to try to try a skilled balance - if they screwed up and i,m sure that they wont , - they can blame us because we ask that.They should implement that at list a month and see the feedback what they have to loose?
Link on message: #16642475
_Zenon, on 11 February 2019 - 02:12 PM, said: Firs part is wrong - in fact the game design must consider the
fun you achieve playing that game and when you are slaughter is no
fun or when you slaughter.Second part is ok and with fun that we should get when we play the game i consider it will take us to that necessary skilled balanced MM.
I can give you a example- diablo 3 has died after hard core players ask blizz to shut down AH. They have listen those and they have been only 25% from all d3 players- now they remained with them because almost all players quit..
The same mistakes will be here too - WG will listen pro players that they dont want skilled ballance and they will remain with them because all occasional players all medium weak players will leave day by day and i dont think more than 30% players have more than 50% Wr.
I can give you another example - Poe - they earn money not like WG because players became frustrated and buy p2w items to get better but contrary they pay GG because they have done a great job with that game. In a perfect world with smart developers WOT should the POE road not D3 road, they should listen all those zillion thread where people ask them to ballance players regarding skill at the end of template.
Anyway i have seen many games buried by the fact that devs dont listen community and i meant the big part of comunity not hard core players, and it wont be the last one.
Someone has a point here -in 8 years they could not understand what is about with this mm why they will do it now , if they don't implement this now , later will be impossible since game bleed players and they will not have this big pool of players to try that,
My advice is to try to try a skilled balance - if they screwed up and i,m sure that they wont , - they can blame us because we ask that.They should implement that at list a month and see the feedback what they have to loose?
eekeeboo: Exactly. Where's the fun in being in the queue?
It's not about not understanding what's wrong with MM,
understanding what's wrong and finding the solution, testing it and
deploying it are very different. Skilled balance is not the
solution many people think it is, this is as a player, not WG. I've
played A LOT of skill-based mm games and only in a few
circumstances has it worked, while introducing a whole new level of
issues.
Subject: Premium Shop: Frontline Champions
Link on message: #16642465
Gardar7, on 11 February 2019 - 06:49 AM, said: Caernarvon AX? Is it 24. December again?
Link on message: #16642465
Gardar7, on 11 February 2019 - 06:49 AM, said: Caernarvon AX? Is it 24. December again?eekeeboo: Yes, only in February and not the 24th... other than that,
exactly the same!
Subject: Wheeled Vehicles: Take Them for a Spin!
Link on message: #16642460
Saar_Lion, on 10 February 2019 - 07:44 AM, said: I can respect your opinion if you want Quake with
Tanks, so don't be shy about admitting it
Modelling "Reality" really doesn't have to be boring - it
can be a challenge. And being challenged is what makes for
immersion, and immersion is what stops a game being boring
For instance - in your opinion - would adding a reality like
limiting the PoV to a point equal to riding in your tanks cupola,
rather than being able to fly up a kite string and see round
mountains and buildings make the game less immersive, or more
immersive?
Link on message: #16642460
Saar_Lion, on 10 February 2019 - 07:44 AM, said: I can respect your opinion if you want Quake with
Tanks, so don't be shy about admitting it
Modelling "Reality" really doesn't have to be boring - it
can be a challenge. And being challenged is what makes for
immersion, and immersion is what stops a game being boring
For instance - in your opinion - would adding a reality like
limiting the PoV to a point equal to riding in your tanks cupola,
rather than being able to fly up a kite string and see round
mountains and buildings make the game less immersive, or more
immersive? eekeeboo: Immersion only works for a set style of game and
audience. When you introduce some of the things you propose, you
don't get immersion, you get simulation, simulation isn't always
immersion.
Subject: Frontline: Meet the Rental Tanks
Link on message: #16642454
Gremlin182, on 11 February 2019 - 05:23 PM, said: Finding out if tanks are any good is what test servers are for.
Unless you are unable to download and install another copy of the
game in a different folder in which case rental would be useful.
Wondering what tank line to follow np wait for a new test to
come along 20 k gold and 100 million xp and credits lets you buy
and try entire lines of tanks. You can also buy 2 maybe 3 premium
tanks. Wait till the test resets and you have another 20 k gold.
I admit its very difficult to get games at low tiers except
when a new tank line is introduced but tier 6 and up is usually
fine
Link on message: #16642454
Gremlin182, on 11 February 2019 - 05:23 PM, said: Finding out if tanks are any good is what test servers are for.
Unless you are unable to download and install another copy of the
game in a different folder in which case rental would be useful.
Wondering what tank line to follow np wait for a new test to
come along 20 k gold and 100 million xp and credits lets you buy
and try entire lines of tanks. You can also buy 2 maybe 3 premium
tanks. Wait till the test resets and you have another 20 k gold.
I admit its very difficult to get games at low tiers except
when a new tank line is introduced but tier 6 and up is usually
fineeekeeboo: Test servers are actually for testing the patch and update
Subject: The Fight of the Bulldogs
Link on message: #16642446
vasilinhorulezz, on 11 February 2019 - 05:35 PM, said: So, another premium tank that's profoundly better that it's
standard counterpart, where have I seen this before? Hmm...
Link on message: #16642446
vasilinhorulezz, on 11 February 2019 - 05:35 PM, said: So, another premium tank that's profoundly better that it's
standard counterpart, where have I seen this before? Hmm...eekeeboo: Any game that wants to keep making money after releasing
hundreds of tanks?
Subject: All About Frontline 2019
Link on message: #16642442
Link on message: #16642442
eekeeboo: I'm not sure of that particular error, some people are reporting
some problems, fixed by restarting their game client.
Subject: Referral Program FAQ
Link on message: #16642408
darko1601, on 11 February 2019 - 05:58 PM, said: yes what 
Link on message: #16642408
darko1601, on 11 February 2019 - 05:58 PM, said: yes what eekeeboo: Yes, you get a tank for each recruit. As was highlighted in
other threads asking this question.
Subject: Technical problems of the referral program interface 2.0
Link on message: #16642403
Link on message: #16642403
eekeeboo: I've just checked and it's working now. Closing topic.
Subject: Referral Program FAQ
Link on message: #16642331
Broster_1, on 08 February 2019 - 11:37 PM, said: hello im new to WoT,ive clicked ther account management option but
can not find the recriut option on the page? am i missing
something?
darko1601, on 09 February 2019 - 02:26 AM, said: do you get prem tank for each recruit or only one ?
Link on message: #16642331
Broster_1, on 08 February 2019 - 11:37 PM, said: hello im new to WoT,ive clicked ther account management option but
can not find the recriut option on the page? am i missing
something? eekeeboo: This is done by someone sending you their recruitment
link!
darko1601, on 09 February 2019 - 02:26 AM, said: do you get prem tank for each recruit or only one ?eekeeboo: So far yes!
Subject: Ön Cephe Kipi İçin En İyi Araçlar
Link on message: #16642309
Sharp1903, on 09 February 2019 - 12:23 PM, said: Holey be, Cent AX kullanabiliriz, tier 10 tank iyi oldu
valla

Link on message: #16642309
Sharp1903, on 09 February 2019 - 12:23 PM, said: Holey be, Cent AX kullanabiliriz, tier 10 tank iyi oldu
valla 
vuque: Sadece 99 kuruş farkla seçiminizi Tier 10'a yükseltmek ister
misiniz?
Subject: Godetevi l'Anno del Maiale con questo pacchetto
Link on message: #16642302
Link on message: #16642302
Sael_: Perchè World of Memes sta un po' su tutte le discussioni. 
Subject: Best Vehicles for the Frontline Mode
Link on message: #16642289
FidelisRaven, on 10 February 2019 - 03:57 PM, said: I just love how you forgot IS3A, Wargaming 
Igor_BL, on 10 February 2019 - 12:11 PM, said: I would like to see some forum CC try to defend this article... To
"prove" how good Ferdinand is... Best used to attack..... MY GOD!
ToodlePips, on 11 February 2019 - 02:36 PM, said: Yeah ... strange, isn't it. Could it be that it is utter
bullcrap? In fact, as far as I'm concerned there
is only one German tank that is really interesting for the
mode, and that is, of course, the Skorpion. The rest is either too
slow to be of much use on the large map (especially when attacking)
or all around garbage. Even the black dog has lost much of its
shine now that the LT-432 is in the game.
Thanks for your great tips, Wargaming. They will be duly ignored.
Link on message: #16642289
FidelisRaven, on 10 February 2019 - 03:57 PM, said: I just love how you forgot IS3A, Wargaming eekeeboo: We forgot nothing! Let's not throw big inflammable objects
into the article!
Igor_BL, on 10 February 2019 - 12:11 PM, said: I would like to see some forum CC try to defend this article... To
"prove" how good Ferdinand is... Best used to attack..... MY GOD!eekeeboo: The armour isn't all bad when up against tier 8's, at the
very least, while they shoot you, they're not shooting your
teammates!
ToodlePips, on 11 February 2019 - 02:36 PM, said: Yeah ... strange, isn't it. Could it be that it is utter
bullcrap? In fact, as far as I'm concerned there
is only one German tank that is really interesting for the
mode, and that is, of course, the Skorpion. The rest is either too
slow to be of much use on the large map (especially when attacking)
or all around garbage. Even the black dog has lost much of its
shine now that the LT-432 is in the game. Thanks for your great tips, Wargaming. They will be duly ignored.
eekeeboo: Generally the tips like these are more used by inexperienced
players and those who have not played FL before, I'm sure your 60k
battles is not the target audience.
Subject: M41D ile Yeşile Dönüşün
Link on message: #16642280
barzo_twitch, on 11 February 2019 - 06:21 PM, said: men alabilerem
Bagora, on 11 February 2019 - 06:22 PM, said: hacıdayıııııı ben denerim ama beğenmediğim yönlerini açık
açık yazarım sakın benden buraya tankı yalandan övmemi bekleme (ama
tankı kalıcı olarak verirsen burda bulunan herkesi bu tankın en iyi
tank olduguna ikna ederim)
Link on message: #16642280
barzo_twitch, on 11 February 2019 - 06:21 PM, said: men alabilerem vuque: Birazdan PM olarak göndereceğim forumdan, mesajlarınıza
bakın lütfen!
Bagora, on 11 February 2019 - 06:22 PM, said: hacıdayıııııı ben denerim ama beğenmediğim yönlerini açık
açık yazarım sakın benden buraya tankı yalandan övmemi bekleme (ama
tankı kalıcı olarak verirsen burda bulunan herkesi bu tankın en iyi
tank olduguna ikna ederim)vuque: Sana da gönderiyorum, istediğin gibi yaz yahu yalandan
övmene gerek yok! İyisini, kötüsünü yaz hiç sıkıntı değil!

Subject: Neden iletilerimizi editleyemiyoruz?
Link on message: #16642275
TeknikBirNuans, on 11 February 2019 - 06:23 PM, said: Sayın Vuque, konu yıllar önce kilitlenmiş olduğundan
editliyemiyoruz.
Link on message: #16642275
TeknikBirNuans, on 11 February 2019 - 06:23 PM, said: Sayın Vuque, konu yıllar önce kilitlenmiş olduğundan
editliyemiyoruz. vuque: O zaman ilgili mesajların sol alt tarafında yer alan
"Report" butonunu kullanarak kendi mesajlarınızı raporlarsanız ve
editlenmesini veya kaldırılmasını istediğinizi belirtirseniz
moderatörler gerekeni yapacaktır. 
Subject: Buldokların Savaşı
Link on message: #16642260
SupremeMaster, on 10 February 2019 - 01:47 AM, said: Vuque ayrılalı bi halt beceremiyor şu çeviri ekibiniz. General
rütbesinde de genel yazıyordu ön cephe haberinde.
Link on message: #16642260
SupremeMaster, on 10 February 2019 - 01:47 AM, said: Vuque ayrılalı bi halt beceremiyor şu çeviri ekibiniz. General
rütbesinde de genel yazıyordu ön cephe haberinde.vuque: Ayrılmadım, buradayım ama bir süredir bu makalelerin ön
kontrolü için zaman bulamadığım doğru. 
Реклама | Adv















