Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: ¡No dejéis que vuestras monedas del aniversario acumulen polvo!
Link on message: #17973168
Link on message: #17973168
Delhroh: ¡A gastar esas monedas! Yo ya he adquirido algunos estilos...
¿cuál es vuestro favorito?
Subject: La cima del árbol: FV4005 Stage II
Link on message: #17973159
Link on message: #17973159
Delhroh: ¡A disfrutar de la nueva cima del árbol! ¿Qué futuro vehículo
os gustaría que fuera el protagonista de este especial?
Subject: Mejor repetición de la semana: Episodio 109
Link on message: #17973156
Link on message: #17973156
Delhroh: Aquel que siga habitualmente nuestro canal de YT sabía de ello...
pero ahora más visibilidad, como se merece... ¡y para
vosotros! ¡A disfrutar!
Subject: Reservad ya: Libro del arte conceptual del 10.º aniversario de WoT
Link on message: #17973108
alepissaurio, on 22 July 2020 - 03:07 PM, said: Lo más gracioso del 10º aniversario, 99 leureles, como quien no
quiere la cosa. Que risa.
WEAPONIZER, on 22 July 2020 - 04:37 PM, said: Creo que no , no me convence por el precio y las cosas que ofrece ,
ya si me diesen un chieftain t95 , pagaba los 100€ aunque solo
fuese el tanque de regalo aparte del propio libro XD
Link on message: #17973108
alepissaurio, on 22 July 2020 - 03:07 PM, said: Lo más gracioso del 10º aniversario, 99 leureles, como quien no
quiere la cosa. Que risa.Delhroh: También hay una edición normal más barata, y tampoco es
limitada.
WEAPONIZER, on 22 July 2020 - 04:37 PM, said: Creo que no , no me convence por el precio y las cosas que ofrece ,
ya si me diesen un chieftain t95 , pagaba los 100€ aunque solo
fuese el tanque de regalo aparte del propio libro XDDelhroh: Entonces sería más caro...
Los mensajes creados para
generar malestar, flames, han sido ocultados y los usuarios
responsables serán sancionados acorde con las normas del
foro. Recordad que siempre se puede criticar la noticia,
siempre que no rompa la norma de los flames y similares. Un saludo
y buena caza.
Subject: Best Replays of the Week: Episode #109
Link on message: #17973106
Xaneleon, on 23 July 2020 - 01:42 PM, said:
How do you know?
Corrupted_Pling, on 23 July 2020 - 11:03 AM, said: If any "winners" are ebrs then this is dumb as hell
Asuschrist, on 23 July 2020 - 12:22 PM, said: Hi, hope someone can help. I was featured on BRW long time
ago and was awarded with BRW camo. Now, ever since WG introduced
styles and 3 part camos that camo piece I received is pretty much
obsolete as I'm able to paint one part of the tank only. Is
there any way it could be replaced with a style that would paint
entire tank? Feel free to check the screenshot for
reference. Regards, Asuschrist
Link on message: #17973106
Xaneleon, on 23 July 2020 - 01:42 PM, said: How do you know?
Dwigt: I can assure you that it won't be an EBR
Did you watch the video?
Corrupted_Pling, on 23 July 2020 - 11:03 AM, said: If any "winners" are ebrs then this is dumb as hellDwigt: You can vote and choose the winner
yourself.
Asuschrist, on 23 July 2020 - 12:22 PM, said: Hi, hope someone can help. I was featured on BRW long time
ago and was awarded with BRW camo. Now, ever since WG introduced
styles and 3 part camos that camo piece I received is pretty much
obsolete as I'm able to paint one part of the tank only. Is
there any way it could be replaced with a style that would paint
entire tank? Feel free to check the screenshot for
reference. Regards, Asuschrist
Dwigt: You can apply it on the modules but it doesn't show right?
Did you submit a ticket to our CS team?
Subject: Diskuze - Sstyxina informuje
Link on message: #17972941
Link on message: #17972941
Sstyx: Abych se vyjádřila k postu našeho moderátora, jak je již ve zvyku
některých lidí, vytrhává se vše jen z kontextu, aby vše zapadalo,
kam oni potřebují. Doporučuji ti nevěřit všemu, co kde slyšíš a sám
si to neověříš za fakta, ale spíše za jistou formu bulvárních
informací, tedy pokud to mohu přirovnat k něčemu z reálného
světa.Příspěvky několika hráčů byly v té debatě brané v nadsázce a
několik hráčů mělo obdobné sarkastické poznámky, co kdyby a jak
kdyby. Debata se nesla v celkem příjemné atmosféře, kde hráči
debatovali na různá témata a teoreticky polemizovali či vyjadřovali
svůj názor k akci. Jak jsem již několikrát nejen já
psala, důkazy předlož na support pokud je nechceš předat někomu
jinému. V pravidlech fóra je N+S zakázán a bohužel jsi nepředložil
nic, co by vypovídalo jinak, ovšem nadále pokračuješ v N+S hráčů i
klanů.Tímto ukončuji tuto debatu a poprosím o dodržování pravidel
fóra, děkuji.
Subject: Najlepsze powtórki tygodnia: Odcinek 109
Link on message: #17972915
Link on message: #17972915
parim1331: Co sądzicie o Serii Najlepszych Powtórek Tygodnia?
Subject: Best Replays of the Week: Episode #109
Link on message: #17972839
Link on message: #17972839
Sael_: Picking the winner is completely up to you!
You can do it with this forum poll.
Subject: Ranked discount on Kampfpanzer 50t
Link on message: #17972670
Corrupted_Pling, on 23 July 2020 - 07:46 AM, said: Should I be buying this at the end of season 1 or is the proposed
discounts going to increase through season 2 and 3 to the 60% off?
The way the article reads suggests to me that the max
discount you can get is 60% off but if I do all the missions in
season 1, which are titled "Final Discount" means I would only get
30% discount this season, however when you look at the aquilifer
skin you are pretty much getting 60% off this from the first season
alone? link to article ->> https://worldoftanks...0-announcement/
Hyina, on 23 July 2020 - 07:52 AM, said: I don't know how much the Kpz costs in bonds, is it also 10000 like
the Progetto skin? At the end of the day no matter how much
the "discounts" are you need to balance your sanity playing
hundreds of games in Leagues vs a few k off the bonds.
Link on message: #17972670
Corrupted_Pling, on 23 July 2020 - 07:46 AM, said: Should I be buying this at the end of season 1 or is the proposed
discounts going to increase through season 2 and 3 to the 60% off?
The way the article reads suggests to me that the max
discount you can get is 60% off but if I do all the missions in
season 1, which are titled "Final Discount" means I would only get
30% discount this season, however when you look at the aquilifer
skin you are pretty much getting 60% off this from the first season
alone? link to article ->> https://worldoftanks...0-announcement/ Dwigt: To answer both of your questions.
You can get that 60% on the Kpz 50t by participating in the next seasons as well. You will keep the discounts from that season and you will be able to get your tank for 8k bonds
Good luck!
You can get that 60% on the Kpz 50t by participating in the next seasons as well. You will keep the discounts from that season and you will be able to get your tank for 8k bonds
Hyina, on 23 July 2020 - 07:52 AM, said: I don't know how much the Kpz costs in bonds, is it also 10000 like
the Progetto skin? At the end of the day no matter how much
the "discounts" are you need to balance your sanity playing
hundreds of games in Leagues vs a few k off the bonds.Dwigt: The Kpz 50t costs 20k bonds and the Progetto 3D style costs 10k.
Subject: Neues vom Supertest - M24E2 Super Chaffee
Link on message: #17972648
Link on message: #17972648
thePhilX: Unser heutiger Neuzugang auf dem Supertest ist der M24E2 Super
Chaffee, ist ein US Amerikanischer leichter Panzer der Stufe
VI.
Das Fahrzeug verfügt über eine
75mm Kanone mit 115 Schaden pro Schuss. Die Durchschlagskraft der
Standard AP-Granate beträgt 120mm und die spezielle APCR-Granate
durchschlägt 155mm. Die Kanone hat eine gute Stabilisierung, die
Genauigkeit beträgt 0,44, die Einzielzeit 1,7s und die Zeit zum
Nachladen 4s. Die Basis-Sichtweite des Panzers ist 380m. Der
Panzer fährt bis zu 56km/h und hat ein Leistungsgewicht von 28,7
PS/t. Es verfügt über 670 Strukturpunkte.Gleichzeitig ähnelt die
Panzerung des Fahrzeugs anderen leichten Panzern der gleichen
Stufe, so dass man sich nicht unbedingt darauf verlassen
sollte. Was den М24Е2 Super Chaffee auszeichnet, sind die hohe
Feuergeschwindigkeit, die stabilisierte Kanone und die gute
Beweglichkeit. Er kann die Rolle eines leichten Panzers spielen und
den Verbündeten Unterstützung bieten. Erste Eindrücke




Alle Werte sind wie immer noch nicht final.
Subject: Otázky a odpovědi
Link on message: #17972551
Maxx01, on 23 July 2020 - 09:47 AM, said: Zdar.Může mi prosím někdo napsat kolik celkem narozeninových mincí
potřebuji na získání čtvrtého klíče v akci 10.výročí?Teda pokud jde
vůbec získatDík.
Link on message: #17972551
Maxx01, on 23 July 2020 - 09:47 AM, said: Zdar.Může mi prosím někdo napsat kolik celkem narozeninových mincí
potřebuji na získání čtvrtého klíče v akci 10.výročí?Teda pokud jde
vůbec získatDík.Sstyx: Ahoj, za mince se nepořizují klíče, ale obsah jako kamufláže a
obtisky. Klíče se získávají za plnění misí, které jsou
dostupné v oznámeném termínu každého aktu.
Subject: Canal personal de DelhRoh
Link on message: #17971878
Link on message: #17971878
Delhroh: ¡¡¡¡HOY RESPONDERÉ VUESTRAS PREGUNTAS EN DIRECTO!!! ¡OS ESPERO
DE 22:00 A 23:00 HORAS!
Mi canal: www.twitch.tv/delhroh
Subject: Aktualizace 1.9.1 - Hlášení chyb
Link on message: #17971490
cpt_Apricot, on 21 July 2020 - 05:21 PM, said: Ahoj, velmi děkuji za odpověď. Ale jsem zmaten. Bez urážky mě nazor
hráčů v tomto konkrétím případě nezajímá to nejsou zaměstanci
provozovatele služby. Zajímá mě názor provozovatele služby, protože
to je podle mě jediná fundovaná autorita a já očekávám její
vyjádření. Kdo z hráču se může k problematice vyjádřit tak jako ten
kdo to vymyšlel, naprogramoval, kdo má přístup ke kompletní
dokumentaci a kdo má přístup k debug nástrojům a následně to pak
hrači případně i opraví? Nehledě na to, že se zde k mému problému
může vyjádřit každý, nebo nikdo. A co, když nechci aby ostatní
viděli replay z nějakého důvodu (vyjadřovaní se o kvalitě hráče a
pod...)? Když si naistaluju nějaký software zdarma (antivir,
kancelařský balík, přehrávač medii...) a obratím se na podporu, tak
to ten člověk semnou řeší - od toho je placený. Tak, že já založím
ticket, ten je zamítnut, abych to samé popsal na foru, kde to se
mnou zaplať bůh někdo rěší... velmi efektivní způsob. To není útok
na tebe, ale výtka na system podpory hráčů. Tobě velmi děkuji za
ochotu se mému problému věnovat. čas 12:22. Link: http://wotreplays.eu...icot-cromwell_b
Link on message: #17971490
cpt_Apricot, on 21 July 2020 - 05:21 PM, said: Ahoj, velmi děkuji za odpověď. Ale jsem zmaten. Bez urážky mě nazor
hráčů v tomto konkrétím případě nezajímá to nejsou zaměstanci
provozovatele služby. Zajímá mě názor provozovatele služby, protože
to je podle mě jediná fundovaná autorita a já očekávám její
vyjádření. Kdo z hráču se může k problematice vyjádřit tak jako ten
kdo to vymyšlel, naprogramoval, kdo má přístup ke kompletní
dokumentaci a kdo má přístup k debug nástrojům a následně to pak
hrači případně i opraví? Nehledě na to, že se zde k mému problému
může vyjádřit každý, nebo nikdo. A co, když nechci aby ostatní
viděli replay z nějakého důvodu (vyjadřovaní se o kvalitě hráče a
pod...)? Když si naistaluju nějaký software zdarma (antivir,
kancelařský balík, přehrávač medii...) a obratím se na podporu, tak
to ten člověk semnou řeší - od toho je placený. Tak, že já založím
ticket, ten je zamítnut, abych to samé popsal na foru, kde to se
mnou zaplať bůh někdo rěší... velmi efektivní způsob. To není útok
na tebe, ale výtka na system podpory hráčů. Tobě velmi děkuji za
ochotu se mému problému věnovat. čas 12:22. Link: http://wotreplays.eu...icot-cromwell_b Sstyx: Zkušení hráči mohou přispět svými poznatky proč tomu tak je, pokud
se například jedná o méně zkušeného hráče nebo případně dovysvětlit
nějakou mechaniku.Jinak je možnost takové věci posílat i v PM přímo
tomu, komu chceš zde na foru, takže není nutné to dávat
veřejně. Jinak ohledně toho replaye, předám to technikům k
prozkoumání, dívala jsem se kam přesně tě trefil. Teoreticky je
toto totiž možné, pokud by část modulu byla ve věži, ovšem v herním
případě si nejsem jistá, jak je to u tohoto tanku provedené.
Jakmile budu mít rozbor, napíši ti.
Subject: Pre-Order Now: 10th Anniversary World of Tanks Art Book
Link on message: #17971336
Dutchreaper, on 22 July 2020 - 01:25 PM, said: The Standard Edition is a 300-page hardcover book with a
metallic foil-stamped cover. The book is in English measuring 29 x
23 cm (11.4 x 9 inches) and in addition to magnificent images,
includes the following in-game goodies:
WoT Premium Account: 7 Days
5 Personal Reserves: +100% XP for 2 hours
5 Missions: x5 XP per victory
1 2D Style: Sense of Direction, Mk. II So for €40
you wil not get the camo of the IS-7
Misago, on 22 July 2020 - 02:20 PM, said: Okay, I will admit, I was not expecting that. World of tanks
is not exactly a game of stunning visuals. THis isn't a
complaint, I like the visuals. But an art book?
Ville67, on 22 July 2020 - 02:23 PM, said: If the Collector's Edition has that cool IS-7 picture at the back,
what does the standard one have? A blank back?
Link on message: #17971336
Dutchreaper, on 22 July 2020 - 01:25 PM, said: The Standard Edition is a 300-page hardcover book with a
metallic foil-stamped cover. The book is in English measuring 29 x
23 cm (11.4 x 9 inches) and in addition to magnificent images,
includes the following in-game goodies: Dwigt: You get double the in game goodies, the IS-7 3D Style and some more
in game items.
Misago, on 22 July 2020 - 02:20 PM, said: Okay, I will admit, I was not expecting that. World of tanks
is not exactly a game of stunning visuals. THis isn't a
complaint, I like the visuals. But an art book?Dwigt: I haven't see it but I suppose the art book contains some tank
designs, maps and from where they were inspired from; maybe some
drafts and sketches.
Ville67, on 22 July 2020 - 02:23 PM, said: If the Collector's Edition has that cool IS-7 picture at the back,
what does the standard one have? A blank back?Dwigt: The IS-7 is on the front cover. I don't think you can see the back
of the book.
https://www.cookandbecker.com/en/artwork/2936/the-art-of-world-of-tanks-world-of-tanks-wargaming.html
https://www.cookandbecker.com/en/artwork/2936/the-art-of-world-of-tanks-world-of-tanks-wargaming.html
Subject: Wierzchołek drzewa: FV4005 Stage II
Link on message: #17971268
AdanTeam, on 21 July 2020 - 02:58 PM, said: Każda opinia bez danych pozostaje opinią. Zatem sięgając do
statystyk - w populacji graczy serwisu wn8lab Lodówka ma drugie
najniższe WN8 spośród wszystkich TD X tieru: 
Link on message: #17971268
AdanTeam, on 21 July 2020 - 02:58 PM, said: Każda opinia bez danych pozostaje opinią. Zatem sięgając do
statystyk - w populacji graczy serwisu wn8lab Lodówka ma drugie
najniższe WN8 spośród wszystkich TD X tieru: 
parim1331: Zgadzam się, pozostaje jeszcze interpretacja danych. Czy
niskie ogólne WN8 bierze się z tego, że czołg sam w sobie jest
stosunkowo słaby, czy dlatego, że czołg posiadany jest przez
większa liczbę gracz, czy przez to, że jest ciężki do ogrania, czy
rzeczywiście dlatego, że jest stosunkowo słaby.
Subject: [Výsledky Sandboxu] Vybavení 2.0: další krok vpřed
Link on message: #17971006
Link on message: #17971006
Sstyx: Tabulka se chystá, snažím se do toho vložit co nejvíce informací a
zároveň to udržet přehledné a jednoduché pro všechny variace, proto
se omlouvám za zdržení. Jakmile bude vše hotové, nasdílím!
Subject: Chrysler K: Not Just Another Brick in the Wall
Link on message: #17970964
Larry_78, on 22 July 2020 - 01:26 PM, said: another Blackmarket rare item on regular sale? that's bad
Link on message: #17970964
Larry_78, on 22 July 2020 - 01:26 PM, said: another Blackmarket rare item on regular sale? that's badvuque: Before it was a Blackmarket item, it was a Premium Shop item.
So I don't see this as a bad move tbh.
Subject: [Résultats de Sandbox] Équipement 2.0 : un autre pas en avant
Link on message: #17970679
Bezoard, on 22 July 2020 - 09:38 AM, said: Missions non encore implémentées alors ?
Link on message: #17970679
Bezoard, on 22 July 2020 - 09:38 AM, said: Missions non encore implémentées alors ? Actinid:
Pour le moment elles le sont mais sur le public test.
Pour le moment elles le sont mais sur le public test.
Subject: Une panthère française rôde
Link on message: #17970671
Link on message: #17970671
Actinid: Le vrai Bretagne Panther de Saumur : 

Subject: Clan Rivals: Rise of the Machines - Questions and Answers
Link on message: #17970597
abrams456, on 22 July 2020 - 09:17 AM, said: Hello, I would like to ask if it's possible/permitted to restream
the finals of this event (in Polish) on my YT and Twitch channels
(https://www.youtube.com/c/abrams456gamer)
(https://www.twitch.tv/abrams_456). If so, may I recive some materials like thumbnails, battles schedule, teams etc. last time I got an agreement and I restreamed Industrial Frontier so I have some "portfolio" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rjg2eqhZAJ8&) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEhwE3q0jh8&) My viewers' feedback was very positive
Thanks in advance
Link on message: #17970597
abrams456, on 22 July 2020 - 09:17 AM, said: Hello, I would like to ask if it's possible/permitted to restream
the finals of this event (in Polish) on my YT and Twitch channels
(https://www.youtube.com/c/abrams456gamer)(https://www.twitch.tv/abrams_456). If so, may I recive some materials like thumbnails, battles schedule, teams etc. last time I got an agreement and I restreamed Industrial Frontier so I have some "portfolio" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rjg2eqhZAJ8&) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEhwE3q0jh8&) My viewers' feedback was very positive
Thanks in advance
Berbo: Could you join world of tanks discord and message me
there? It shouldnt be a problem to give you the cleanfeed.
Subject: [Résultats de Sandbox] Équipement 2.0 : un autre pas en avant
Link on message: #17970523
Fozzy50, on 21 July 2020 - 06:10 PM, said: Merci Actinid pour la réponse. Même si elle ne clarifie rien du
tout... De quelles missions est-ce que vous parlez ?
Link on message: #17970523
Fozzy50, on 21 July 2020 - 06:10 PM, said: Merci Actinid pour la réponse. Même si elle ne clarifie rien du
tout... De quelles missions est-ce que vous parlez ?Actinid:
Des missions sont disponibles en jeu afin de gagner des kits de démantèlement :
Des missions sont disponibles en jeu afin de gagner des kits de démantèlement :

Subject: Nie pozwólcie, aby Wasze monety jubileuszowe pokryły się kurzem!
Link on message: #17970510
Kozietulski, on 20 July 2020 - 07:14 PM, said:
Parim a Ty na 40-stke chciałbyś dostać album z naklejkami polskiej ligi piłkarskiej, czy wolałbyś dobrą whiskey?
banan1983, on 20 July 2020 - 08:04 PM, said: Wy też nie pozwólcie aby Polskie medy były o kant tyłka rozbić i
nie pokryły się kurzem a zwłaszcza premka!!! Bo na to się
zapowiada
misanth, on 21 July 2020 - 05:44 AM, said: Nie wierzę, że sam o to zapytałeś. Musieli Ci kazać. Od
samego początku ten sklep jubileuszowy jest przedmiotem drwin,
wszyscy narzekają, że nie ma na co wydawać tych monetek a tu nagle
community manager, na sam koniec tych hucznych obchodów pyta, co
byście chcieli w sklepie? Serio?
wornock_, on 21 July 2020 - 07:37 AM, said: @up widzisz to juz osoby ktore nie sa powiazane z WG w zaden sposob
bardziej aktywnie sledza dyskutuja w tematach niz "Nasz czlowiek w
WG" . i jak dobrze wspopmniales on stosuje taka metode zaczepna -
bum cyk wrzuca jakis post wywoluje zainteresowanie - reakcje graczy
a pozniej cisza - 0 kontynuacji. Nawet jakby kontynuowal watek to
co on moze - raczej nie wiele - Tym sie nie zajmuje tego nie moze,
na to nie ma wplywu - na dobra sprawe wiekszosc informacji i
odpowiedzi sam potrafie znalezc - w skali od 1-10 - pozytek jak dla
mnie pomiedzy 2 a 3.
Link on message: #17970510
Kozietulski, on 20 July 2020 - 07:14 PM, said: Parim a Ty na 40-stke chciałbyś dostać album z naklejkami polskiej ligi piłkarskiej, czy wolałbyś dobrą whiskey?
parim1331: Każdą tego typu sprawę trzeba rozpatrywać osobiście. Jedyni
ucieszyliby się z albumu, a drudzy z whisky. Nie wymijając
pytania, wolałbym dobry Gin
banan1983, on 20 July 2020 - 08:04 PM, said: Wy też nie pozwólcie aby Polskie medy były o kant tyłka rozbić i
nie pokryły się kurzem a zwłaszcza premka!!! Bo na to się
zapowiadaparim1331: Cały czas zbieramy opinie na temat tych maszyn. Nasi
developerzy aktywnie się im aktualnie przyglądają jak również
analizują dane zebrane podczas Testu publicznego.
misanth, on 21 July 2020 - 05:44 AM, said: Nie wierzę, że sam o to zapytałeś. Musieli Ci kazać. Od
samego początku ten sklep jubileuszowy jest przedmiotem drwin,
wszyscy narzekają, że nie ma na co wydawać tych monetek a tu nagle
community manager, na sam koniec tych hucznych obchodów pyta, co
byście chcieli w sklepie? Serio?parim1331: Pytanie było czysto hipotetyczne. Chciałem dowiedzieć się co
Wy, jako gracze, chcielibyście zobaczyć w sklepie
Jubileuszowym, skoro aktualny asortyment, wyraźnie kilku osobom na
forum się nie podoba. Tak swoją drogą, to nie koniec obchodów
rocznicy.
wornock_, on 21 July 2020 - 07:37 AM, said: @up widzisz to juz osoby ktore nie sa powiazane z WG w zaden sposob
bardziej aktywnie sledza dyskutuja w tematach niz "Nasz czlowiek w
WG" . i jak dobrze wspopmniales on stosuje taka metode zaczepna -
bum cyk wrzuca jakis post wywoluje zainteresowanie - reakcje graczy
a pozniej cisza - 0 kontynuacji. Nawet jakby kontynuowal watek to
co on moze - raczej nie wiele - Tym sie nie zajmuje tego nie moze,
na to nie ma wplywu - na dobra sprawe wiekszosc informacji i
odpowiedzi sam potrafie znalezc - w skali od 1-10 - pozytek jak dla
mnie pomiedzy 2 a 3.parim1331: Zgadzam się z Tobą w tym, że zależy mi na wywołaniu
zainteresowania, a w szczególności na konstruktywnej dyskusji
pomiędzy graczami. Jak również wydaje mi się, że
potrzebuję rozjaśnić z lekka naturę swojej pracy, tak odnośnie "Tym
sie nie zajmuje tego nie moze". Jako pracownik zespołu ds.
społeczności nie jestem developerem gry, ani projektantem mechanik
czy też wydarzeń. Zarówno ja, jak i moi koledzy oraz koleżanki z
zespołu zajmujemy się w dużej części przekazywaniem Waszych opinii
właśnie tym, którzy jak to określiłeś mogą. Dlatego właśnie zależy
nam na ów konstruktywnych dyskusjach.
Subject: Le Chrysler K : Not Just Another Brick in the Wall
Link on message: #17970496
Psy0pus, on 22 July 2020 - 07:53 AM, said: Il me semble que celui que tu obtiens avec les obligations est la
version GF, donc avec un espèce de camo noir que tu ne peux pas
changer.
Alors que celui-ci est nu, tu peux y mettre le camo/style que tu veux.
Sinon, d'un point de vu statistique, ce sont exactement les mêmes.
Link on message: #17970496
Psy0pus, on 22 July 2020 - 07:53 AM, said: Il me semble que celui que tu obtiens avec les obligations est la
version GF, donc avec un espèce de camo noir que tu ne peux pas
changer.Alors que celui-ci est nu, tu peux y mettre le camo/style que tu veux.
Sinon, d'un point de vu statistique, ce sont exactement les mêmes.
Actinid:
Je confirme il n'y a que le camouflage qui change.
Je confirme il n'y a que le camouflage qui change.
Subject: Clan Rivals: Rise of the Machines - Questions and Answers
Link on message: #17970415
Link on message: #17970415
thePhilX: 1) everyone has to be in the same clan, this includes the
captain 2) yes, rewards are excluded for the group stage and
the play-offs only. So there is no tank limitations for the
qualifiers
Subject: First Community Q&A Answers. Get Ready for the Second One!
Link on message: #17969580
Link on message: #17969580
Dwigt: Hello Commanders, First I want to thank everyone for
participating in this first Q&A.It took a while for me to prepare
all the answers and try to make it presentable. Due to some forum
limitations I had to give short answers and cut some questions but
I linked them to the original questions.You will find
my answers in green below in the spoiler below. I
see that you have a lot to say and this is a great chance to
discuss it with us and I appreciate that! This why I am
continuing with this Q&A experiment.So feel free to drop your
questions for the next Q&A in the comments below! Some
questions were a bit long I had to cut parts of them to fit all of
them in a single post. You can still find the full questions
in the original post and in the next one please
consider summarizing your question. Thank you, enjoy your
day and I'm looking forward for the next round! Are any
more multinational tanks planned Not for now, but in one
of the previous dev talks, we previously said that we probably
have plans to add more multinational tanks.
Wow,you sure did get a lot of positive feedback on this. We
can see here how WoT is growing. My question is why you
guys dont start really listening to us players and
implementing the changes that we want before your servers look like
this thread? We’re doing it
That’s why we have a dedicated community team gathering
all the feedback from different sources and channels, sandbox
servers for our players to take part of the testing and sharing
their feedback. We want to involve the community in our
decision making but keep in mind that those changes need
time to be implemented as they concern our entire base. Those
changes cannot be made lightly and need time to gather
the data, feedback and take the appropriate decision.
Are there any plans to include a transparent set of
camouflages (as is done on World of Tanks Console) (Link)
Customization elements and camouflages received some changes
recently and we’re always adding styles and new sets of camouflage.
It’s always nice to add more customization abilities to the
players. Maybe paints will be reworked soon too, we never
know. We've seen a lot of 3D Styles being implemented,
mostly at Tier X Or on Premium tanks. Are there plans to try to
expand this to more tech tree vehicles below Tier X? (Link)
Are there any plans / could we please have more historical
(historically inspired) 3D skins for vehicles that saw actual
combat? (Link) Could this possibly be used to expand the
limited camouflages options for nations such as Italy, Japan,
Sweden, Poland and Czechoslovakia? Or perhaps simply add new
camouflages for these nations? (Link) We are constantly adding
more styles for all tiers and tanks. One of the most recent ones
was the KV2 Crimson style. The T30 Style from the 10 years
anniversary events. Are WG Aware that some tanks have
particularly dated textures, even since being updated to HD, such
as the T-55A, Obj. 260 Or the more recently available Obj. 777 II.
Are there any plans to potentially update the textures for such
tanks? As far as I know, all the tanks textures were updated by
now. The Obj 777 II has the HD updated texture with the tree branch
on its side. Yes, you are right, at first, when the transitioned to
HD with patch 1.0, the most played tanks were first restyled and
then every patch, other tanks were reworked and updated. 3D styles
are different that HD textures and I think I understand why you
would ask this question. On some tanks, the difference textures
will not be very noticeable and on others, specially new ones
because of the advanced technical and artistic capabilities you
will see the difference. Since you mentioned that Japanese
TDs won't be released in 2020, are they planned for next year
(2021)? We’re currently working on the Polish Medium line which is
now on the CT server. The Italian Heavy line should be next in line
but for now we don’t have any news on the Japanese TD line or any
dates. It's now been a year since the Type 5 Heavy (and
other Japanese super-heavy tanks alongside with it) was nerfed, how
does it perform now a year after? Are there plans to change the
armor layout of the Japanese super-heavies so that they are more
enjoyable to play and more enjoyable to play against? Your 2
questions can be answered at the same time. Some heavy tanks are
getting buffed in the upcoming 1.10 update, but the Type 5 is not
on that list so this maybe should mean that it’s performing well.
Now regarding the Japanese heavies design it’s something that we
cannot change easily. It already has around 280 frontal armor which
is not bad, but the box shaped design of the tanks is their weak
point. Rebalancing tanks depends on their performance, players
feedback and on different stats such as pick rate, win rate… and
apparently Japanese heavies are doing okay now. Should they be
buffed in the future, I guess we’ll have to wait and see.
Are there plans for a tier VIII Japanese premium heavy tank? I’m
not sure I completely understood your question. There are other
nations like China and Sweden that don’t have artillery branches
too. All I can say about adding Heavy Premium Tanks is that we’re
adding new tanks, new branches and maybe someday new nations.
Are there plans to introduce a vehicle branch with a
multi-turret mechanism (ex. French super-heavy tanks like FCM
F1)? We now have the double barrel tanks which is not very
different than the multi-turret mechanism. Gas turbine engines will
be introduced with the Polish Medium tanks so, like you said, we
are always trying to add new mechanics and maybe multi-turret tanks
will be one of them someday. How are you going to tackle
around the hugely growing toxidity in the in game chat? Toxicity in
games is something that we are always trying to limit in our games.
It’s a problem in online gaming and we should all face it together.
Best way to deal with a toxic player messaging you in private would
be muting and blocking them, then reporting them through our in
game system. In some very serious cases such as harassment and
bullying in game we recommend reaching out to our CS team with proofs (Screenshots, recordings,
videos…
so we can act against these players. Are there
any plans, any thoughts, about Italian TD line for the future.
Stuff like all the different Semoventi. We don’t have any plans for
now to add an Italian TD line. The heavy line was confirmed and is
being developed but who know’s what nation or tank or line
will come next! Is there any hope WG could look at how
bad/mediocre some of the tier X light tanks are and think about
some buffs? Tank rebalancing is an ongoing thing. You buff a
tank, another one becomes underpowered and vice versa. As we
already said in previous dev talks, we’re aiming to rework the
shell system, a general rebalancing for all tanks, and then we
would be able to rebalance all the vehicles case by case. Now in
that particular case of Light tanks, we are working on nerfing the
wheeled vehicles which will make some other light tanks more
reliable. Wheeled were overperforming in their class and tiers but
they never replaced other conventional light tanks simply because
wheeled tanks can not fit all roles. Why can't I sell
or hide crew books/blueprints for nations I refuse to use ? I want
to ask if WG will ever allow us to sell unwanted special
skins/camo's. I guess these 2 questions can be answered together.
We don’t have any plans for selling crew books, camos or
blueprints, at least for now. You never know when they can come in
handy! If you decide to try a new tank or start a new tech tree
line like the Polish Meds, it can save you a lot of xp, time and
credits! Are there any plans for a South Africa Tree? I have
looked and there is enough for a full line of lights and a
offspring Medium No plans for now! We’re working on
expanding some existing nation’s tree for now. We always have
different suggestions from the community to add different nations
but it takes a huge amount of research and work to find and use
accurate blueprints of the tanks to add them to the game. You
can start by suggesting these ideas on the forums and get other
players feedback and ideas and maybe who knows you’re a South
African Commander in the game! Are there plans for Chieftain
Mk 6 to come to the PC server? No current plans for now but we
will see what the future brings! Are there plans for nation
v nation random battles to come back? We have new and old events
coming soon. Some of part of the 10 years celebration, Steelhunter
and many others! Personally, nation v nation battles would be
unbalanced since not all nations have the same types and tiers of
tanks but it would fun and honestly no one will stand a chance
against the French
When will bond shop tanks be updated?
We updated the tank selection with the new ranked season. These tanks will be added to the current
selection and will not be the only addition to the bond shop.
Will you look at testing +1/-1 mm for all tiers? or perhaps
have it a trial week like which was done on WOT consol If you think
about it now the only tiers that have a -2/+2 MM are Tier 6 7 and
8. It’s a very long discussion that will lead into different topics
and other questions but for now I can tell you that we do not have
any plans to change the MM system.
Entering a battle in the bottom tier is not very amusing but tier isn’t the only factor that affects the outcome in a battle. During the dev talk with Andrey Biletskiy, Creative Director for World of Tanks and Circon, With this MM system, not every battle is the same, sometimes you get the high roll and get placed in top tier sometimes you have to manage how to survive in these situations where you placed in bottom tiers. Please can you think about bringing back preferential mm for some premiums such as M4 improved , A45/fv201 and others which are severely underpowered in +2 mm No, we are not planning to add new special MM tanks. Will you consider allowing us to block 3 maps instead of 2? Why not 4 ! Will you look at adding these British tanks: Churchil AVRE , FV4401 Contetious , Harry Hopkins, Tetrarch , FV303, Vickers MBT , Crusader AT , Comres 75 and British wheeled tanks I understand that some players have favorite nations, tanks even classes
We are always working on new
tanks. The last British tank that we added on our Supertest server
was the A46 light tank. We also announced other British
tanks that are still on ST last year. But keep in mind that
not all tanks or changes that are on the ST will make it to
the game When will you add a time next to the date on the
tankrewards.eu page? This is not a bad idea, maybe a countdown.
I’ll forward your suggestion to the team! Thank you! Will
there ever be new game modes for Random Battles? Will we ever get
multiple hangar options such as the ports in World of Warships?
There’s a lot of cool ideas that we can borrow from WoWs but for
the moment we do not plan on adding new permanent game modes or
multiple hangars, as cool as they may look. However, we have a lot
of in game events coming. Steel Hunter is right around the corner!
Are you ready? As for the garages, I believe there are mods that
will change it for you. You can find them on our mod
portal. Is there a possibility to add a "minimum
queue time" of 5 seconds or so, or add it as an option in the
settings somehow? It happens sometimes and it can be a bit
annoying, but I guess adding this delay will increase the overall
queue time and especially if you’re using some boosters. It’s not a
bad idea in my opinion and can be forwarded to our devs. In the
meantime remember to check your load-out before
queuing
Can someone please fix
intro-clip on Russian double barrels and Italian autoloaders ? I’m
afraid I didn’t get your question. Can you please be more specific?
Hello, can you consider reworking or add a new show/hide
elite vehicle filter? We are currently reworking the garage UI in
the upcoming Equipment 2.0 changes. Although I’m not sure there
will be a special filter for the Elite Vehicles, it can be a good
addition for the garage. Thank you! Regarding Grand Battle,
is it possible to do some digging and share with us the stats of
how many players (who can enable Grand Battle) actually do that,
and how many Grand Battle games are there out of all tier 10. Sadly
no, I can share this kind of stats. Regarding the map videos, it’s
a new concept that we tried with the Berlin map and I personally
would love to see it for other maps. It can help new and old
players. I believe there are 3 map guides on our Youtube
Channel but hopefully we’ll have more of them soon. And
don’t forget to check out our contributors channels. They always
have interesting map and tanks reviews. Reward tanks, so
essentially what I am proposing is, limit these reward tanks so
that they cannot play in any competitive gaming mode of WoT. I
think the same question was asked during the dev talk and the
answer was that these 2 or 3 reward tanks can be considered as
overpowered but how often do you get them in randoms? And in my
opinion randoms should be free for all. When it comes to ranked
battles, we’re trying to make it fair and based on skills for
everyone by limiting overperforming vehicles and removing reward
tanks. If there will be a new meta then at least everyone will be
able to play it. As for CW and other modes, we are not planning to
apply the same rules from ranked battles, but you never know what
can change. CW can be exclusive but it’s a mode that requires a lot
of team coordination and strategy and for that top clans should be
rewarded and be able to use these rewards somewhere. Let’s wait for
this Ranked Season’s feedback and see if this was a step in the
right direction! In-game toxicity We all had a taste of the
in game chat toxicity at some point. I, like you, believe in the
game support in general, not only for WoT. As far as I know we have
moderators checking on the general chat in game. We are always
looking to reduce in game toxicity and thankfully our CS team is
doing an awesome job against toxic players but because of our
policies and GDPR we do not inform the players that we banned that
other player they reported which sometimes let them think that we
don’t act against toxicity, but we do. And since we’re talking
about in game toxicity, I understand that loosing or having someone
on your team is not doing well can be frustrating, but you don’t
have to insult one another. Keep in mind that it’s a game to enjoy
and to have fun. Instead of flaming that person in the chat and
then sending him a PM full of “lovely words” try sending him some
advice maybe next time so he can improve his gameplay. And
finally, one last question which is non-game related. Dwigt is
so mysterious that most players know so little about since you have
started as CM for the EN community. Will you tell us more about
yourself like where you come from, and will we be seeing you on the
WoT EU stream anytime soon? I wouldn’t say mysterious but
with the confinement and working from home it was a bit weird,
especially when you’re starting a new job! We discussed going on a
stream with eekeeboo or other CMs and CCs but it’s still a bit
early but it will happen so be ready! Other than that, I’m French
Lebanese, worked in other gaming/PC components companies in
PR, marketing and community management. I’m interested in esports
and competitive gaming. I’m also interested in WWII history and
military stuff. (I almost applied to the French Navy). I’ll
keep the rest for the stream! Can we get a definitive
statement on nerfing overperforming premium vehicles? We do not
have definitive answers when it comes to upcoming changes and
balancing. As you can see on the forums there is a lot of different
opinions. Take the Progetto or EBR changes for example. We’re not
nerfing specific vehicles but we’re nerfing a certain
overperforming mechanic that according to our different source of
feedback and statistics was breaking the game. Changes are not
always welcomed (not only in games) but without changes stuff
become obsolete and boring. You just need to make sure the changes
are for the best and that is why we have test servers and why your
feedback counts! Why is the Paris office being closed and
all staff moved to Prague, and what are your feeling about that
move? Part of the WoT team is moving to Prague to join our WoWs
buddies who made the jump three years ago. Some of us are already
there, some are in the process of moving. Paris office is much more
than just the, relatively small, WoT team and it will stay open.
Personally, I'm still enjoying Paris but we live in an
umpredicatble world now, you never know were you're gonna end
up and I'm more of a wine guy!
Entering a battle in the bottom tier is not very amusing but tier isn’t the only factor that affects the outcome in a battle. During the dev talk with Andrey Biletskiy, Creative Director for World of Tanks and Circon, With this MM system, not every battle is the same, sometimes you get the high roll and get placed in top tier sometimes you have to manage how to survive in these situations where you placed in bottom tiers. Please can you think about bringing back preferential mm for some premiums such as M4 improved , A45/fv201 and others which are severely underpowered in +2 mm No, we are not planning to add new special MM tanks. Will you consider allowing us to block 3 maps instead of 2? Why not 4 ! Will you look at adding these British tanks: Churchil AVRE , FV4401 Contetious , Harry Hopkins, Tetrarch , FV303, Vickers MBT , Crusader AT , Comres 75 and British wheeled tanks I understand that some players have favorite nations, tanks even classes
Subject: Don't Let Your Anniversary Coins Collect Dust!
Link on message: #17969446
Misago, on 20 July 2020 - 03:27 PM, said: So far, I got that one premium style for the Superpershing.
Everything else is either boring or useless. And I could
really do without the "lol we are so in on the joke people are
making about our complete and utter failure to balance the game"
emblems. Showing you know how terrible the balance is vis a vis
artillery, OP premiums and wheeled lights does not make you cool,
Wargaming. You're the Luigi Cadorna of game development.
PlymArgyle1982, on 20 July 2020 - 03:33 PM, said: How many people out there actually care about emblems,
badges, patterns, decals etc.?
ZeroKelvin, on 20 July 2020 - 05:07 PM, said: For new players you got free camos For grinders you get free good
reserves For CW-Players you get free directives including the
desired ones
Cerberus91, on 20 July 2020 - 06:54 PM, said: "Hey people, you should spend your coins on that store till that
date" - why won't our players spend on our great anniversary store?
Surely the fault is with them. /s
I wonder is it avoidance or ignorance? I suspect avoidance.
Link on message: #17969446
Misago, on 20 July 2020 - 03:27 PM, said: So far, I got that one premium style for the Superpershing.
Everything else is either boring or useless. And I could
really do without the "lol we are so in on the joke people are
making about our complete and utter failure to balance the game"
emblems. Showing you know how terrible the balance is vis a vis
artillery, OP premiums and wheeled lights does not make you cool,
Wargaming. You're the Luigi Cadorna of game development.Sael_: If you think that the emblems are an admission of problems
within the game, I'm afraid you are looking at them under the wrong
light. They are actually meant to commemorate community memes.
Unpopular take, but player opinion is not the base criteria to
determine what is a problem for the game and what is not - aka, a
ton of people complaining that a certain tank is overpowered does
not make it true.
This doesn't quite look like a Caporetto to me.
This doesn't quite look like a Caporetto to me.
PlymArgyle1982, on 20 July 2020 - 03:33 PM, said: How many people out there actually care about emblems,
badges, patterns, decals etc.? Sael_: A lot, actually. Very many players have been sending us a lot
of positive feedback concerning customization items and the desire
for us to expand on them.
ZeroKelvin, on 20 July 2020 - 05:07 PM, said: For new players you got free camos For grinders you get free good
reserves For CW-Players you get free directives including the
desired onesSael_: It's not a bad idea to remind people that they can get all
these things.
Cerberus91, on 20 July 2020 - 06:54 PM, said: "Hey people, you should spend your coins on that store till that
date" - why won't our players spend on our great anniversary store?
Surely the fault is with them. /sI wonder is it avoidance or ignorance? I suspect avoidance.
Sael_: Could it not be just a reminder? As somebody else was
suspecting several posts ago, there's totally going to be someone
popping up just out of time limit asking how to spend their
coins... 
Subject: A French Panther on the Prowl
Link on message: #17969390
Duke_Harkonnen, on 21 July 2020 - 08:52 AM, said: I also found it in garage and I do not remember I playd a game in
it.
oBmg, on 21 July 2020 - 10:04 AM, said: Please can we get Bretagne Panther R or Pudel R? R-
stands for recaptured We need at least playable
German tier VI medium premium.
DeBarbellian, on 21 July 2020 - 02:40 PM, said: I got this one for free, I don't remember how nor when, but it's a
pretty fun tank IMHO.
I like it.
The tech tree version is better, but I don't have a spare German crew, si I'm playing this one instead.
It's historical, the camo is actually pretty and unique, it's not bad, it sometimes makes some credit, so overall I like it.
(I don't know if I would have paid it 15 euros though to be honest...)
Link on message: #17969390
Duke_Harkonnen, on 21 July 2020 - 08:52 AM, said: I also found it in garage and I do not remember I playd a game in
it.Sstyx: And when you find it in the garage, will you try to play with it
now?
oBmg, on 21 July 2020 - 10:04 AM, said: Please can we get Bretagne Panther R or Pudel R? R-
stands for recaptured We need at least playable
German tier VI medium premium.Sstyx: Maybe in the future. Do you think that this tank would be suitable
for more lines than just for the FR and DE lines?
DeBarbellian, on 21 July 2020 - 02:40 PM, said: I got this one for free, I don't remember how nor when, but it's a
pretty fun tank IMHO.I like it.
The tech tree version is better, but I don't have a spare German crew, si I'm playing this one instead.
It's historical, the camo is actually pretty and unique, it's not bad, it sometimes makes some credit, so overall I like it.
(I don't know if I would have paid it 15 euros though to be honest...)
Sstyx: You probably got it from Tank Reward at the beginning of the year.
It was there as one of the rewards if I remember correctly.
I really like this tank, I only played a few
battles with it (I think around 50?), but after the Ranked battle I
would like to try to mark it. Any advice on the crew, equipment,
etc.? I will be grateful for any advice which you give
me!
Subject: [Sandbox Results] Equipment 2.0: Taking Another Step Forward
Link on message: #17969382
grasho, on 21 July 2020 - 11:45 AM, said:
I’ll disagree. A better example is your (and WG’s) behaviour following the sandbox testing. When told it was unwelcome, unfair and would alienate players you ignored us and WG carried on regardless. Equip 2.0 includes equipment changes, tier changes, cost changes, conversion method, categorisations and more. Equipment changes are being tinkered with, tier changes are carrying on despite us thinking they are destructive, cost is staying the same, our concerns about losing huge amounts of game investment is to insult us with 30 demount kits (and not addressing our concerns), and categorisations are still going ahead (in an obvious attempt to force us into a WG decided playstyle). You haven’t listened; you’ve just pretended. You have also shown you are pointless. I asked you if WG were going to introduce Equip 2.0 regardless of our feedback and you suggested WG had still not decided to introduce Equip 2.0. Then, within days, WG announces Equip 2.0 is going to be in the next release. Given the time needed to package and test changes in a software release (even a sandbox) the decision to press ahead probably occurred before you suggested no decision had been made.
May I suggest that if you want to be useful, you need to ensure you get the truth before you say anything?
Link on message: #17969382
grasho, on 21 July 2020 - 11:45 AM, said: I’ll disagree. A better example is your (and WG’s) behaviour following the sandbox testing. When told it was unwelcome, unfair and would alienate players you ignored us and WG carried on regardless. Equip 2.0 includes equipment changes, tier changes, cost changes, conversion method, categorisations and more. Equipment changes are being tinkered with, tier changes are carrying on despite us thinking they are destructive, cost is staying the same, our concerns about losing huge amounts of game investment is to insult us with 30 demount kits (and not addressing our concerns), and categorisations are still going ahead (in an obvious attempt to force us into a WG decided playstyle). You haven’t listened; you’ve just pretended. You have also shown you are pointless. I asked you if WG were going to introduce Equip 2.0 regardless of our feedback and you suggested WG had still not decided to introduce Equip 2.0. Then, within days, WG announces Equip 2.0 is going to be in the next release. Given the time needed to package and test changes in a software release (even a sandbox) the decision to press ahead probably occurred before you suggested no decision had been made.
May I suggest that if you want to be useful, you need to ensure you get the truth before you say anything?
parim1331: There's a very simple answer to your concern. As you know,
feedback from our players is not only gathered from English forums
in EU, but also from other languages and region, and equally
important, from surveys and our own data gathering. Our game
designers and developers take all of those into account when making
decisions. Throwback to couple of months ago when we had
tested the concept of the ammunition rebalance and players didn't
like it, as you know the idea went back to be reworked.
Subject: A French Panther on the Prowl
Link on message: #17969365
wsatnutter, on 21 July 2020 - 06:41 AM, said: price aint bad but the tank is
Link on message: #17969365
wsatnutter, on 21 July 2020 - 06:41 AM, said: price aint bad but the tank isSael_: It doesn't have to be the best tank to be put out there, it's
enough that it does its own thing on the battlefield.
And it performs despite its cons.Plus it looks great
and is a nice memory from last year's Tankfest. <3
I just had to climb it!
I just had to climb it!
Subject: Diskuze - Sstyxina informuje
Link on message: #17969357
tettex, on 21 July 2020 - 03:03 PM, said: Vše se dělo se souhlasem vedení klanu. Proto je klan do aféry
namočen. Vše se dělo s vědomím zaměstnance WG . Proto je
zaměstnanec do aféry namočen. Výše máš zkratky dvou nicků. Jeden v
Daffy už není. Najdi si v seznamu klanu/hráčů a konej. PS: Zeptej
se zaměstnance WG kde a jak získal objekt 907 . (malá
nápověda CSA)
Link on message: #17969357
tettex, on 21 July 2020 - 03:03 PM, said: Vše se dělo se souhlasem vedení klanu. Proto je klan do aféry
namočen. Vše se dělo s vědomím zaměstnance WG . Proto je
zaměstnanec do aféry namočen. Výše máš zkratky dvou nicků. Jeden v
Daffy už není. Najdi si v seznamu klanu/hráčů a konej. PS: Zeptej
se zaměstnance WG kde a jak získal objekt 907 . (malá
nápověda CSA)Sstyx: Milý tettexi, svou 907 jsem si poctivě vyjela sama, stejně jako
sama hraji Rankedy, stejně jako sama plním mise (konečně na obj.
279r ) . To, že jsem jednou v tom klanu a v jednou v onom
neznamená, že na svůj účet někoho pustím. Můj účet je mi dražší než
nějaký pochybný zisk z podvodu a již několikrát jsem psala kdy,
proč a jak jsem kde byla.Naposledy, doporučuji si přečíst pravidla
fora, N+S je zde zakázaný. Klidně se pobavím o tvých důkazech,
které můžeš předložit via PM, můžeš přizvat i jiného hráče pro tvůj
klid, avšak pokračovat v tomto duchu ti nedoporučuji. Nedovolila
bych ti obvinovat takto bez důkazu ani jiného hráče.
Subject: Wierzchołek drzewa: FV4005 Stage II
Link on message: #17969281
ur70, on 20 July 2020 - 04:49 PM, said:
Po czym lodówka strzela i odczuwa się ogromny pokład współczucia dla gracza, bo albo nie trafił, albo nie przebił, albo zadał śmiesznie niskie uszkodzenia.
wornock_, on 21 July 2020 - 06:42 AM, said:
szkoda ze nie mam godzili, bo gdybym mial to lodowka poszla by do skupu na zyletki Godzila potrafi cos odbic wieza, podwoziem , - w lodowce to czysty papier nawet 8 tiery bez golda to przebijaja i swieci sie po strzale z kilometra
. a strzaly takie ze wysyla do garazu 1 strzalem
zdarzaja sie niezmiernie rzadko - najczesciej sa to dmge rzedu
800-1000 (co przy przeladowaniu 25-27 sek zalezy co kto uzywa)
skupianiu w nieskonczonosc celownikowi wielkosci slonia -nie jest
wartoscia jakas powalajaca..Ty strzelisz raz a kazdy med strzeli
cie w tym czasie 3 strzaly, a jak lepszy med typu stb to i
4
- dodatkowo objada cie - ty nie obrocisz lufy i
garaz
. a ciezkie czolgi zdaza cie 2 razy
strzelic- po 450+- skleja sie z toba i nie zaladujesz heka bo
dostaniesz swoj dmg ten magiczny jeden strzal to w pojazdy
typu tvp progeto wtf, grile (najczesciej) ale nie zawsze - decyduje
takze rng gdzie twoj pocisk poleci niby celownik na zielono a
poleci nizej i nie wejdzie za pelny dmg
Link on message: #17969281
ur70, on 20 July 2020 - 04:49 PM, said: Po czym lodówka strzela i odczuwa się ogromny pokład współczucia dla gracza, bo albo nie trafił, albo nie przebił, albo zadał śmiesznie niskie uszkodzenia.
parim1331: Jak każdy inny pojazd w grze może nie trafić, porównywalnie
to samo tyczy się Jgdpz E 100. Aczkolwiek jak już trafi z
przebiciem to nie ma co zbierać.
wornock_, on 21 July 2020 - 06:42 AM, said: szkoda ze nie mam godzili, bo gdybym mial to lodowka poszla by do skupu na zyletki Godzila potrafi cos odbic wieza, podwoziem , - w lodowce to czysty papier nawet 8 tiery bez golda to przebijaja i swieci sie po strzale z kilometra
parim1331: Lodówka sama w sobie nigdy nie miała posiadać pancerza, w
grze taki pojazd z dobrym opancerzeniem byłby zbyt mocny.
Subject: Grasująca francuska Pantera
Link on message: #17969271
Giw12, on 21 July 2020 - 08:51 AM, said: Nie zdziwię się jak w paczkach świątecznych
Link on message: #17969271
Giw12, on 21 July 2020 - 08:51 AM, said: Nie zdziwię się jak w paczkach świątecznychparim1331: Do świąt to my jeszcze trochę mamy.
Co do samej Pantery, co
sądzicie o czołgu jak i o jego historii?
Subject: Diskuze - Sstyxina informuje
Link on message: #17969202
tettex, on 21 July 2020 - 01:58 PM, said: O tom, co podáváš výše nebo ne nic nevím. Jak bych také mohl.
Znám nicky viníků a ti tanky stále mají. Stejně tak členové
Daffy stále hrají. Třeba A_W_P, nebo V_d.P_a (nicky jsou
zkráceny) Věděla jsi o všem a z toho se nevykecáš.
Link on message: #17969202
tettex, on 21 July 2020 - 01:58 PM, said: O tom, co podáváš výše nebo ne nic nevím. Jak bych také mohl.
Znám nicky viníků a ti tanky stále mají. Stejně tak členové
Daffy stále hrají. Třeba A_W_P, nebo V_d.P_a (nicky jsou
zkráceny) Věděla jsi o všem a z toho se nevykecáš.Sstyx: Tyto zkratky mi opravdu nic neříkají, bohužel na to tak důkladně
všechny členy klanu neznám
Dokonce jsem se podívala i na
lab-vole.cz na členy klanu, první opravdu na nikoho nesedí a druhý
- myslíš, že s jeho skilem a umem by něco takového riskoval? Tedy
pokud ty tvé zkratky přiřazuji správně.Jak píši, pokud máš důkaz,
že se účastnili tohoto co jsi napsal, není nic lehčího, než je
nareportovat. Pokud ne, pak bych raději měla důkaz o tomto, než
budu někoho z něčeho takového obviňovat veřejně. Ani já si
netroufnu veřejně zostuzovat jiné hráče nebo klany, pokud to nemohu
něčím podepřít. Jak sám píšeš, nevíš co předávám, proto bych
být tebou nepoužívala výrazy, které nemůžeš podepřít a obvinovat mě
z něčeho tak vážného. Jelikož ano, opravdu vše předávám. Já vím, je
to šok, ale je to jak to je.
Subject: Diskuze - Sstyxina informuje
Link on message: #17969134
tettex, on 21 July 2020 - 01:42 PM, said: Lžeš. Jako člen tohoto klanu jsi o tom věděla. Jedinou tvou reakcí
byl odchod z klanu. Není to trochu málo? Jistě jsi vše
jako loajální zaměstnanec firmy nahlásila sama.
Link on message: #17969134
tettex, on 21 July 2020 - 01:42 PM, said: Lžeš. Jako člen tohoto klanu jsi o tom věděla. Jedinou tvou reakcí
byl odchod z klanu. Není to trochu málo? Jistě jsi vše
jako loajální zaměstnanec firmy nahlásila sama. Sstyx: Máš nějak podložená svá tvrzení o tom, že lžu a nepředávám vše
výše? Případně že viníci nebyli potrestáni?
Subject: Ne laissez pas vos pièces d'Anniversaire prendre la poussière !
Link on message: #17969086
Link on message: #17969086
Actinid: Pour le moment j'ai remonté dans mes retours que : "Les offres
n'étaient pas assez intéressantes pour que le joueurs souhaitent
dépenser leur jetons". Merci pour vos retours. Je ne peux
cependant pas communiquer sur les prochaines ventes. En
espérant que vous puissiez quand même trouver votre bonheur ! =)
Subject: Diskuze - Sstyxina informuje
Link on message: #17969073
tettex, on 21 July 2020 - 12:30 PM, said: Ahoj. Chtěl bych veřejně Sstyx položit jednu otázku. Jak
jako zaměstnec WG zasáhlá proti nekalým praktikám v klanu
Daffy. Jde o vyjíždění odměnových tanků z kampaní. A to za
reálné peníze narychlo přijatým hráčům. Mohu doložit nicky těch co
vyjížděli i těch, kterým byly tanky vyježděny. Je to podraz na
poctivé hráče i majitele WG.
Link on message: #17969073
tettex, on 21 July 2020 - 12:30 PM, said: Ahoj. Chtěl bych veřejně Sstyx položit jednu otázku. Jak
jako zaměstnec WG zasáhlá proti nekalým praktikám v klanu
Daffy. Jde o vyjíždění odměnových tanků z kampaní. A to za
reálné peníze narychlo přijatým hráčům. Mohu doložit nicky těch co
vyjížděli i těch, kterým byly tanky vyježděny. Je to podraz na
poctivé hráče i majitele WG.Sstyx: Ahoj, pokud máš důkaz o vyjíždění v jakémkoli klanu, vždy to můžeš
zaslat na support, kde celou situaci prověří a viníky potrestají.
Pokud já něco takového mám, postupuji naprosto stejným způsobem,
abych podpořila férovost hry pro všechny.
Subject: report
Link on message: #17968879
Mogadisho, on 21 July 2020 - 11:25 AM, said: Jak tady píšeš o chatbanu, vyhodnocuje systém situace, kdy člověka
sice nereportuju, protože si report schovávám na něco závažnějšího,
ale dám si ho zablokovat pro danou bitvu? Dělám to poměrně často,
kdy yolo kašpar někde umře a zbytek bitvy na někoho kliká,
popřípadě někoho uráží. Tohle by samo osobě mohlo být celkem dobrý
na ty notorický klikače do mapy.
Link on message: #17968879
Mogadisho, on 21 July 2020 - 11:25 AM, said: Jak tady píšeš o chatbanu, vyhodnocuje systém situace, kdy člověka
sice nereportuju, protože si report schovávám na něco závažnějšího,
ale dám si ho zablokovat pro danou bitvu? Dělám to poměrně často,
kdy yolo kašpar někde umře a zbytek bitvy na někoho kliká,
popřípadě někoho uráží. Tohle by samo osobě mohlo být celkem dobrý
na ty notorický klikače do mapy.Sstyx: Dobrý dotaz, ovšem obávám se, že na něj momentálně nemám odpověď.
Zkusím zjistit!
Subject: [Sandbox Results] Equipment 2.0: Taking Another Step Forward
Link on message: #17968827
Erwin_Von_Braun, on 16 July 2020 - 06:06 PM, said: Kinda frustrating too that WG staff have chosen not to participate
in this debate - just another insult from folk that claim to care
about our feedback but, in reality, they couldn't care less.
Link on message: #17968827
Erwin_Von_Braun, on 16 July 2020 - 06:06 PM, said: Kinda frustrating too that WG staff have chosen not to participate
in this debate - just another insult from folk that claim to care
about our feedback but, in reality, they couldn't care less.parim1331: I can assure you that the feedback that you guys leave in the
forums threads is analyzed and later sent to people responsible for
certain feature, same goes with Equipment 2.0 and this
thread. I would also like to address what you wrote in your
post, namely "just another insult from folk that claim to care
about our feedback but, in reality, they couldn't care less."- This
cannot be further from the truth. We, as Community Team, always
relay the feedback that our players share with us. Furthermore, the
best example is the 1st and 2nd iteration of Sandbox testing, if
you carefully analyze both, meaning player's feedback left after
the 1st iteration, and then our article about the 2nd iteration,
you will quickly notice, that almost all of the concerns raised by
our players in regard to Equipment 2.0 were addressed. For
myself, I was unable to participate in the conversation, and the
forum life in general due to real life stuff. I reckon everyone can
understand that.
Subject: [Résultats de Sandbox] Équipement 2.0 : un autre pas en avant
Link on message: #17968798
Fozzy50, on 13 July 2020 - 07:23 PM, said: +1
C'est clair que ... c'est pas clair !
Je l'ai lu en anglais aussi, mais c'est pas plus clair... Pourquoi est-ce que WG ne dit pas clairement ce que vont devenir les équipements ?!?!? Pour les équipements classiques : Globalement, l'ancien équipement sera remplacé par un nouveau qui prendra en compte les particularités du système retravaillé. Par exemple, le Fouloir de canon moyen calibre pour les chars et les canons automoteurs deviendra le Fouloir de canon de classe 2, que vous pourrez équiper sur les véhicules de rangs V à VII et sur les chars de rangs VIII à X avec lesquels il était compatible précédemment. Pour les équipements améliorés : Lorsque le système d'équipement 2.0 sera déployé sur nos serveurs live, toute pièce d'Équipement améliorée équipée sur vos véhicules sera automatiquement envoyée au dépôt. Pour les équipements qui ne seront plus de la même classe: L'équipement dont la classe changera comparée à la classe actuelle du véhicule sera indiqué par une icône d'avertissement. Vous pouvez utiliser cette pièce d'équipement sur un char en particulier mais il sera impossible de la rééquiper une fois démontée. Cette pièce d'équipement sera envoyée au dépôt au lancement de la prochaine mise à jour. Si j'ai bien compris, les équipements actuellement possédés par les joueurs (ceux équipés sur les chars et ceux au dépôt) vont devenir des équipements d'une certaine classe, de sorte que leur valeur (d'achat/vente) reste la même, pour ne pas léser les joueurs. Ce qui donnerai ça : Ventilation Classe 1 améliorée (50 K) => Ventilation Classe 3 améliorée (50 K) Ventilation Classe 2 améliorée (150 K) => Ventilation Classe 2 améliorée (200 K) Ventilation Classe 3 améliorée (600 K) => Ventilation Classe 1 améliorée (600 K) Système de visée amélioré (500 K) => Système de visée amélioré Classe 1 (600 K) Filet de camouflage (100 K) => Filet de camouflage Classe 2 (100 K) Télescope binoculaire (500 K) => Télescope binoculaire Classe 1 (600 K) Optiques traitées (500 K) => Optiques traitées Classe 1 (600 K) etc Du coup, des équipements se retrouveront sur des chars alors qu'ils ne sont pas de la bonne classe (presque tous les petits rangs en l’occurrence). Si c'est bien ça, pourquoi est-ce que WG ne le dit pas clairement ????? Je ne suis pas sûr de comprendre ta question. Réfère toi à ma réponse ci-dessus ou n'hésites pas à la reformuler. Et pourquoi seulement les chars de rangs IV à VII ????? De quoi ? " Seuls les chars de rangs VIII à X équipés d'un Fouloir de canon gros calibre seront compatibles avec le Fouloir de canon de classe 1 à l'avenir. " Ça non plus c'est pas clair !! Je suis même à-peu-près sûr que ce n'est pas ça que WG voulait dire...
De plus, on pourra mettre un revêtement anti-éclats sur les chars légers de rang V à X, mais pas sur les médiums jusqu'au rang VII inclus ??? Pourquoi les légers et pas les médiums ???? Je ne trouve pas l'info sur le Système de visée amélioré : sera-t-il toujours indisponible pour les artilleries ? Si oui, pourquoi ?!? Ensuite, il est indiqué que les équipements auront des bonus améliorés quand ils seront équipés dans un emplacement de la même catégorie que l'équipement. Mais pour certains équipements (Filet de camouflage et Silencieux d'échappement), WG indique des valeurs bonus amélioré pour les différents types de chars, alors qu'en fait un seul type de char a un emplacement de cette catégorie (Reconnaissance) : les légers. J'ai mal compris ou c'est une erreur ? Je pense que l'Équipement radio amélioré devrait aussi augmenter la portée radio ; c'est logique. Surtout qu'en l'état ça n'apporte pas assez d'avantage par rapport aux autres équipements pour que les joueurs le choisissent... Enfin, 30 kits de démantèlement maxi, alors que WG pourrait tout démonter gratuitement d'office, ça a l'air juste minable !!! D'ailleurs, c'est hors sujet, mais j'aimerai bien savoir pourquoi je n'ai gagné qu'un seul kit de démantèlement en ~2000 batailles ?!?!? As-tu finis les missions ?
Link on message: #17968798
Fozzy50, on 13 July 2020 - 07:23 PM, said: +1C'est clair que ... c'est pas clair !
Je l'ai lu en anglais aussi, mais c'est pas plus clair... Pourquoi est-ce que WG ne dit pas clairement ce que vont devenir les équipements ?!?!? Pour les équipements classiques : Globalement, l'ancien équipement sera remplacé par un nouveau qui prendra en compte les particularités du système retravaillé. Par exemple, le Fouloir de canon moyen calibre pour les chars et les canons automoteurs deviendra le Fouloir de canon de classe 2, que vous pourrez équiper sur les véhicules de rangs V à VII et sur les chars de rangs VIII à X avec lesquels il était compatible précédemment. Pour les équipements améliorés : Lorsque le système d'équipement 2.0 sera déployé sur nos serveurs live, toute pièce d'Équipement améliorée équipée sur vos véhicules sera automatiquement envoyée au dépôt. Pour les équipements qui ne seront plus de la même classe: L'équipement dont la classe changera comparée à la classe actuelle du véhicule sera indiqué par une icône d'avertissement. Vous pouvez utiliser cette pièce d'équipement sur un char en particulier mais il sera impossible de la rééquiper une fois démontée. Cette pièce d'équipement sera envoyée au dépôt au lancement de la prochaine mise à jour. Si j'ai bien compris, les équipements actuellement possédés par les joueurs (ceux équipés sur les chars et ceux au dépôt) vont devenir des équipements d'une certaine classe, de sorte que leur valeur (d'achat/vente) reste la même, pour ne pas léser les joueurs. Ce qui donnerai ça : Ventilation Classe 1 améliorée (50 K) => Ventilation Classe 3 améliorée (50 K) Ventilation Classe 2 améliorée (150 K) => Ventilation Classe 2 améliorée (200 K) Ventilation Classe 3 améliorée (600 K) => Ventilation Classe 1 améliorée (600 K) Système de visée amélioré (500 K) => Système de visée amélioré Classe 1 (600 K) Filet de camouflage (100 K) => Filet de camouflage Classe 2 (100 K) Télescope binoculaire (500 K) => Télescope binoculaire Classe 1 (600 K) Optiques traitées (500 K) => Optiques traitées Classe 1 (600 K) etc Du coup, des équipements se retrouveront sur des chars alors qu'ils ne sont pas de la bonne classe (presque tous les petits rangs en l’occurrence). Si c'est bien ça, pourquoi est-ce que WG ne le dit pas clairement ????? Je ne suis pas sûr de comprendre ta question. Réfère toi à ma réponse ci-dessus ou n'hésites pas à la reformuler. Et pourquoi seulement les chars de rangs IV à VII ????? De quoi ? " Seuls les chars de rangs VIII à X équipés d'un Fouloir de canon gros calibre seront compatibles avec le Fouloir de canon de classe 1 à l'avenir. " Ça non plus c'est pas clair !! Je suis même à-peu-près sûr que ce n'est pas ça que WG voulait dire...
De plus, on pourra mettre un revêtement anti-éclats sur les chars légers de rang V à X, mais pas sur les médiums jusqu'au rang VII inclus ??? Pourquoi les légers et pas les médiums ???? Je ne trouve pas l'info sur le Système de visée amélioré : sera-t-il toujours indisponible pour les artilleries ? Si oui, pourquoi ?!? Ensuite, il est indiqué que les équipements auront des bonus améliorés quand ils seront équipés dans un emplacement de la même catégorie que l'équipement. Mais pour certains équipements (Filet de camouflage et Silencieux d'échappement), WG indique des valeurs bonus amélioré pour les différents types de chars, alors qu'en fait un seul type de char a un emplacement de cette catégorie (Reconnaissance) : les légers. J'ai mal compris ou c'est une erreur ? Je pense que l'Équipement radio amélioré devrait aussi augmenter la portée radio ; c'est logique. Surtout qu'en l'état ça n'apporte pas assez d'avantage par rapport aux autres équipements pour que les joueurs le choisissent... Enfin, 30 kits de démantèlement maxi, alors que WG pourrait tout démonter gratuitement d'office, ça a l'air juste minable !!! D'ailleurs, c'est hors sujet, mais j'aimerai bien savoir pourquoi je n'ai gagné qu'un seul kit de démantèlement en ~2000 batailles ?!?!? As-tu finis les missions ?
Actinid:
Subject: Speciální letní akce: Highway Rock!
Link on message: #17968775
kledek, on 20 July 2020 - 07:27 PM, said: Kdy konečně dostaneme odměny za 2. část?
Link on message: #17968775
kledek, on 20 July 2020 - 07:27 PM, said: Kdy konečně dostaneme odměny za 2. část?Sstyx: Tento týden se bude vše připisovat.
Реклама | Adv















