[Sandbox Results] Equipment 2.0: Taking Another Step Forward

grasho, on 21 July 2020 - 11:45 AM, said:
I’ll disagree. A better example is your (and WG’s) behaviour following the sandbox testing.  When told it was unwelcome, unfair and would alienate players you ignored us and WG carried on regardless.   Equip 2.0 includes equipment changes, tier changes, cost changes, conversion method, categorisations and more.   Equipment changes are being tinkered with, tier changes are carrying on despite us thinking they are destructive, cost is staying the same, our concerns about losing huge amounts of game investment is to insult us with 30 demount kits (and not addressing our concerns), and categorisations are still going ahead (in an obvious attempt to force us into a WG decided playstyle).   You haven’t listened; you’ve just pretended.   You have also shown you are pointless.  I asked you if WG were going to introduce Equip 2.0 regardless of our feedback and you suggested WG had still not decided to introduce Equip 2.0.  Then, within days, WG announces Equip 2.0 is going to be in the next release.   Given the time needed to package and test changes in a software release (even a sandbox) the decision to press ahead probably occurred before you suggested no decision had been made.
May I suggest that if you want to be useful, you need to ensure you get the truth before you say anything?