Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Domination et traque d'acier
Link on message: #11701853
Link on message: #11701853
Rhaya: Bonjour, Pour avoir essayé avec deux T8 et un T10, sans
faire une bataille incroyable mais en portant le drapeau une fois,
j'étais à +20K en victoire. Donc, c'est possible si on
sort pas que des T10 d'être positif sur ce mode.
Rhaya
Subject: Favourite streamer
Link on message: #11701789
Link on message: #11701789
Ectar: I lurk in a lot of different channels, usually I'm not logged in
when doing so or on my non work related account. Fosc0,
Sir_Foch or Circonflexes are who I normally watch. Orzanel too
Subject: Thank you Wargaming
Link on message: #11701707
Link on message: #11701707
Ectar: Patch day there was about 4-5 Action X in each team. Nice to
see people playing that tank, really enjoying it myself.
Subject: Project "Black Gold": The Scorpion’s Tail
Link on message: #11701687
knightM, on 20 November 2015 - 02:27 PM, said: So if you take 1 unoccupied province on map and then leave
map you keep 75% of 400 = 300 points? (just double-checking)
Link on message: #11701687
knightM, on 20 November 2015 - 02:27 PM, said: So if you take 1 unoccupied province on map and then leave
map you keep 75% of 400 = 300 points? (just double-checking)Decept1on: That's correct.
Subject: Weekend Fun cup
Link on message: #11701664
bionog, on 06 November 2015 - 08:23 AM, said: One day cups are really nice. I used to play on the NA server and
was taking part in daily blitz and weekday warfare tournaments
regularly. As they last only 1 day everyone can just sign up for a
tournament whenever they have the time for it. My guess is that
during weekdays there is more time for players to participate in
those, why else would the E-sports department of the NA server
choose to have them on weekdays?
Dr_Nibble, on 20 November 2015 - 12:34 PM, said: I think it's a good idea to play a tournament on a single day. This
makes it easier to organise a team, the shorter the tournament the
better.
Link on message: #11701664
bionog, on 06 November 2015 - 08:23 AM, said: One day cups are really nice. I used to play on the NA server and
was taking part in daily blitz and weekday warfare tournaments
regularly. As they last only 1 day everyone can just sign up for a
tournament whenever they have the time for it. My guess is that
during weekdays there is more time for players to participate in
those, why else would the E-sports department of the NA server
choose to have them on weekdays?Berbo:
Dr_Nibble, on 20 November 2015 - 12:34 PM, said: I think it's a good idea to play a tournament on a single day. This
makes it easier to organise a team, the shorter the tournament the
better. Berbo: Thank you for your feedback guys, We'll probably test
both weekends and week days in order to cater everyone. Also
shorter cups are definitely more interesting rather than playing
for a whole week which includes 3 days of games. Cheers
Subject: Project "Black Gold": The Scorpion’s Tail
Link on message: #11701657
Decept1on, on 20 November 2015 - 12:02 PM, said: Why 1137 ? Should be 1120 (70%).
Link on message: #11701657
Decept1on, on 20 November 2015 - 12:02 PM, said: Why 1137 ? Should be 1120 (70%).Decept1on: Nevermind this, it should be 1136 as you said, I used the
wrong value (old one).
Subject: Contre Les Mods
Link on message: #11701624
Link on message: #11701624
Rhaya: Bonjour, Sujet déplacé dans la section Logiciels
utiles, Mods et Add-ons Rhaya
Subject: Aktualizace 9.12: Řešení technických problémů
Link on message: #11701343
Klaster12, on 20 November 2015 - 12:45 PM, said: dobře, tak offline aktualizace, prostě jsem jí jednou stáhl,
tak ji vezmu na "flešce" dom a zaktualizuju.
Link on message: #11701343
Klaster12, on 20 November 2015 - 12:45 PM, said: dobře, tak offline aktualizace, prostě jsem jí jednou stáhl,
tak ji vezmu na "flešce" dom a zaktualizuju.Kayi4ek: Tuším, že to nejde. Zkus napsat na podporu, tam ti poradí.
Subject: Special: Version 9.12 Release
Link on message: #11701134
jovce_fighter, on 18 November 2015 - 08:47 PM, said: Uhhh... Why the Common Test get closed?
Awwww... Have to wait to 2016 Year then the CT to be
open... :arty:
Link on message: #11701134
jovce_fighter, on 18 November 2015 - 08:47 PM, said: Uhhh... Why the Common Test get closed? Ectar: the test servers are only active when there is contest to
test. As 9.12 is now live there is no requirement for the
test server until the next planned patch is ready to come.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Questions & Answers
Link on message: #11701002
Oneshotmiracle, on 20 November 2015 - 01:56 AM, said: I have one question regarding this. Even if we did not advance to
the next round and only 15 teams did , do we still technically get
16th spot and win 1500 gold? We were the only draw in
1/32 and we still score more points than other team so we should be
16th team on ladder right? Team : Team: baptist in
dirty water
Link on message: #11701002
Oneshotmiracle, on 20 November 2015 - 01:56 AM, said: I have one question regarding this. Even if we did not advance to
the next round and only 15 teams did , do we still technically get
16th spot and win 1500 gold? We were the only draw in
1/32 and we still score more points than other team so we should be
16th team on ladder right? Team : Team: baptist in
dirty waterKarlie: Hi, you need to win in 1/32 to receive that reward. But If I
am not mistaken, first stretch goal was reached so you should
get 500 gold.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11700965
jacek1127, on 19 November 2015 - 10:30 PM, said: RUSSIAN DISCO IN THE FOREST ! vs Snow White and 6 Dwarfs
First battle draw, RUSSIAN DISCO IN THE FOREST ! 7:9
for Snow White and 6 Dwarfs Second battle draw, RUSSIAN DISCO
IN THE FOREST! 0:0 Snow White and 6 Dwarfs, but RUSSIAN
DISCO IN THE FOREST! made more damage (304 : 217) for RUSSIAN
DISCO IN THE FOREST ! Third battle win, RUSSIAN DISCO IN THE
FOREST! win by cap and final score was 7:5 for RUSSIAN DISCO IN THE
FOREST! 1 Battle: http://imgur.com/eiWiGZc http://imgur.com/IaYhSD5 2 Battle:
http://imgur.com/huilRzz
http://imgur.com/xIWGS2t
3 Battle: http://imgur.com/AmgSPkD
http://imgur.com/Oy8iha7
Link on message: #11700965
jacek1127, on 19 November 2015 - 10:30 PM, said: RUSSIAN DISCO IN THE FOREST ! vs Snow White and 6 Dwarfs
First battle draw, RUSSIAN DISCO IN THE FOREST ! 7:9
for Snow White and 6 Dwarfs Second battle draw, RUSSIAN DISCO
IN THE FOREST! 0:0 Snow White and 6 Dwarfs, but RUSSIAN
DISCO IN THE FOREST! made more damage (304 : 217) for RUSSIAN
DISCO IN THE FOREST ! Third battle win, RUSSIAN DISCO IN THE
FOREST! win by cap and final score was 7:5 for RUSSIAN DISCO IN THE
FOREST! 1 Battle: http://imgur.com/eiWiGZc http://imgur.com/IaYhSD5 2 Battle:
http://imgur.com/huilRzz
http://imgur.com/xIWGS2t
3 Battle: http://imgur.com/AmgSPkD
http://imgur.com/Oy8iha7Karlie: 1st battle, you have only 2 points advantage (needed 3) 2nd
battle no tier advantage 3rd battle win Overall you needed 2 wins,
you have only 1. Sorry, both teams are out.
Subject: The Weekend Fun Cup - Information and Updates
Link on message: #11700874
Link on message: #11700874
Berbo: The registration will be closed today! Hurry and sign up,
you have until 20:00 CET this evening
HF!
Subject: El MGT-20 de Wargaming estará en el Fun & Serious de Bilbao
Link on message: #11700802
Link on message: #11700802
CurlyJohnny: ¡Qué ganas! ¿A quiénes os veremos por allí? 
Subject: Project "Black Gold": The Scorpion’s Tail
Link on message: #11700800
knightM, on 19 November 2015 - 07:04 PM, said: Seems clear enough, currently just 2 questions: 1. Do the
provinces need to be connected to HQ to get the points for holding
or not? 2. In point 2.2 it says that provinces can be captured
by "taking part in an auction" Does this mean that the auction with
bids will be open on all provinces? Doesn't look like it from the
context.
jemster, on 19 November 2015 - 07:42 PM, said: Question regarding 2.8: It says that if a province is unoccupied
and someone captures it a part of its generated FP goes into "Land
Value" (as of 2.4) and count as part of the value that can be
captured. I wonder if it is the same for capturing owned provinces?
For example: Place A is unoccupied for two days and has 800
points. Clan X captures A and gains all 800 and out of those 200 is
added to the land value to be potentially taken by the next guy.
Correct so far? If clan X then holds it for another two days before
losing it to clan Y the province has 1800 points to be divided
between X and Y according to 2.7. Correct? Place A is
occupied for two days by clan X and has 1600 points before clan Y
captures it, clan Y receives 1137 points. Is then 25% of that added
to to the land value of the province? Also, if you leave the
map, will you leave a fraction of the land value behind (like if
someone captured it) or will you leave all of it behind?
LilJumpa, on 20 November 2015 - 08:01 AM, said: Does every clan have a fixed number of influence for the campaign
in order to take part in the auctions, or can we use the influence
the clans have gathered up untill this point?
Silas001, on 20 November 2015 - 09:22 AM, said: Is Decept1on reading/answering here? - If not pls direct me to a
thread where he does. -----------------------------------
The Front will work the same as those during the Operation “Safari”
event. ----------------------------------- Does that mean
you can set new landings, while you are on the map (as it was
during the "Safari" )? Following question would be, can one bid on
auctions as well, while your clan is already on the map and is
there a limit to that?
Link on message: #11700800
knightM, on 19 November 2015 - 07:04 PM, said: Seems clear enough, currently just 2 questions: 1. Do the
provinces need to be connected to HQ to get the points for holding
or not? 2. In point 2.2 it says that provinces can be captured
by "taking part in an auction" Does this mean that the auction with
bids will be open on all provinces? Doesn't look like it from the
context.Decept1on: 1. No 2. Yes, there will be auctions, and landing.
Landing provinces will change their location after each Prime Time
pass.
jemster, on 19 November 2015 - 07:42 PM, said: Question regarding 2.8: It says that if a province is unoccupied
and someone captures it a part of its generated FP goes into "Land
Value" (as of 2.4) and count as part of the value that can be
captured. I wonder if it is the same for capturing owned provinces?
For example: Place A is unoccupied for two days and has 800
points. Clan X captures A and gains all 800 and out of those 200 is
added to the land value to be potentially taken by the next guy.
Correct so far? If clan X then holds it for another two days before
losing it to clan Y the province has 1800 points to be divided
between X and Y according to 2.7. Correct? Place A is
occupied for two days by clan X and has 1600 points before clan Y
captures it, clan Y receives 1137 points. Is then 25% of that added
to to the land value of the province? Also, if you leave the
map, will you leave a fraction of the land value behind (like if
someone captured it) or will you leave all of it behind?Decept1on: Yep, but remember that unoccupied province after capture
will give the clan "75%" of points. Like it was captured by clan
for 1 day. Correct. Why 1137 ? Should be 1120 (70%). If you
leave the map you leave all behind, only points when province
was captured will stay with clan.
LilJumpa, on 20 November 2015 - 08:01 AM, said: Does every clan have a fixed number of influence for the campaign
in order to take part in the auctions, or can we use the influence
the clans have gathered up untill this point?Decept1on: You use the influence you already have (or not) to play,
don't forget landings are free.
Silas001, on 20 November 2015 - 09:22 AM, said: Is Decept1on reading/answering here? - If not pls direct me to a
thread where he does. -----------------------------------
The Front will work the same as those during the Operation “Safari”
event. ----------------------------------- Does that mean
you can set new landings, while you are on the map (as it was
during the "Safari" )? Following question would be, can one bid on
auctions as well, while your clan is already on the map and is
there a limit to that?Decept1on: No, applying for landing/auction when you have province is
forbidden for 1st stage.
It will be enabled during second stage.
It will be enabled during second stage.
Subject: Potřebuji poradit.
Link on message: #11700670
tresnovec, on 19 November 2015 - 04:36 PM, said: Ahoj, mám problém s obrazem. Nevím jak to popsat......Připojení bez
problémů...Když jsem na hlavní stránce garáž , tak se část obrazu
slévá do jednoho bodu? Nikdy jsem neměl tento problém. Zkusil jsem
přeinstalovat Wo....., ale stejný problém. Díky za radu....J
Link on message: #11700670
tresnovec, on 19 November 2015 - 04:36 PM, said: Ahoj, mám problém s obrazem. Nevím jak to popsat......Připojení bez
problémů...Když jsem na hlavní stránce garáž , tak se část obrazu
slévá do jednoho bodu? Nikdy jsem neměl tento problém. Zkusil jsem
přeinstalovat Wo....., ale stejný problém. Díky za radu....JKayi4ek: Napiš na podporu prosím.
Subject: Platnost relace automatického přihlašení skončila
Link on message: #11700663
Link on message: #11700663
Kayi4ek: Napiš na podporu prosím.
Subject: Projet « Or noir » : la queue du scorpion
Link on message: #11700639
Link on message: #11700639
Azkolek: Effectivement, il s'agit des rangs I à VI, c'est maintenant
corrigé dans l'article, merci de l'avoir souligné 
Subject: Aktualizace 9.12: Řešení technických problémů
Link on message: #11700561
Mor_Fatal, on 20 November 2015 - 09:53 AM, said: Zdar, má někdo problém s instalací samotného patche? V průběhu
stahování (někdy až v průběhu instalace) se objeví hláška "kritická
chyba, nejdou zabalit soubory...nelze zapsat...zkontrolujte log",
atd. Problém je, že jsem zkusil stažené soubory z "Updates"
vymazat, celou hru komplet přeinstalovat a problém se stahováním a
instalací (SD) přetrvává. Log hlásí jen problém s otevřením
souboru, takže nic, co bych nevěděl:-( PC je po HW stránce v
pohodě, jedu na Win 7 64-bit a mody nepoužívám. Na NTB proběhla
instalace bez problému. Nevíte někdo, v čem může být problém? Díky
Klaster12, on 20 November 2015 - 11:00 AM, said: Je k dispozici offline patch ? Díky
Link on message: #11700561
Mor_Fatal, on 20 November 2015 - 09:53 AM, said: Zdar, má někdo problém s instalací samotného patche? V průběhu
stahování (někdy až v průběhu instalace) se objeví hláška "kritická
chyba, nejdou zabalit soubory...nelze zapsat...zkontrolujte log",
atd. Problém je, že jsem zkusil stažené soubory z "Updates"
vymazat, celou hru komplet přeinstalovat a problém se stahováním a
instalací (SD) přetrvává. Log hlásí jen problém s otevřením
souboru, takže nic, co bych nevěděl:-( PC je po HW stránce v
pohodě, jedu na Win 7 64-bit a mody nepoužívám. Na NTB proběhla
instalace bez problému. Nevíte někdo, v čem může být problém? DíkyKayi4ek: Napiš prosím na podporu.
Klaster12, on 20 November 2015 - 11:00 AM, said: Je k dispozici offline patch ? DíkyKayi4ek: Offline patch?
Subject: Nespravedlivý permaban
Link on message: #11700501
Bloodysnakee, on 20 November 2015 - 10:48 AM, said: No to klidně zveřejni, zajímá mě to
Link on message: #11700501
Bloodysnakee, on 20 November 2015 - 10:48 AM, said: No to klidně zveřejni, zajímá mě toKayi4ek: Powerleveling. Vice kdyžtak v PM.
Subject: Nespravedlivý permaban
Link on message: #11700478
Bloodysnakee, on 20 November 2015 - 01:16 AM, said: Zdravím, byl mi dvakrát ukraden účet, napodruhé byl zloděj
tak hodný, že jsem kvůli němu dostal permaban. Customer support
uznali že jde o krádež accountu, přesto mě poslali do prdele a na
to abych mohl pokračovat s hraním jim musím dovolit mi smazat vše
co na účtu je. Kompletní wipe. Netušíte někdo co by s tím šlo
dělat? Ano, opravdu uznali, že jde o krádež... Perma je za
porušení pravidla 4.08. Nicméně možná to nebude 2x po sobě to
vloupání, protože ban mi došel 1 den po změně hesla. Jinak
zabezpečení svých účtů beru celkem vážně, proto mi tvé označení
"mezi židlí a klávesnicí" přijde celkem urážlivé. Zároveň jsem do
té doby neměl nikdy žádné potíže s dodržováním pravidel (nedostal
jsem ani ban na 1h). Zkouším dál kontaktovat co jde, nicméně na
customer support už mě slušně poslali do háje "že prý je jim líto,
ale nemůžou s tím nic dělat"...
Bloodysnakee, on 20 November 2015 - 09:48 AM, said:
Link on message: #11700478
Bloodysnakee, on 20 November 2015 - 01:16 AM, said: Zdravím, byl mi dvakrát ukraden účet, napodruhé byl zloděj
tak hodný, že jsem kvůli němu dostal permaban. Customer support
uznali že jde o krádež accountu, přesto mě poslali do prdele a na
to abych mohl pokračovat s hraním jim musím dovolit mi smazat vše
co na účtu je. Kompletní wipe. Netušíte někdo co by s tím šlo
dělat? Ano, opravdu uznali, že jde o krádež... Perma je za
porušení pravidla 4.08. Nicméně možná to nebude 2x po sobě to
vloupání, protože ban mi došel 1 den po změně hesla. Jinak
zabezpečení svých účtů beru celkem vážně, proto mi tvé označení
"mezi židlí a klávesnicí" přijde celkem urážlivé. Zároveň jsem do
té doby neměl nikdy žádné potíže s dodržováním pravidel (nedostal
jsem ani ban na 1h). Zkouším dál kontaktovat co jde, nicméně na
customer support už mě slušně poslali do háje "že prý je jim líto,
ale nemůžou s tím nic dělat"...Kayi4ek: Vyřešeno. Ban máš zcela oprávněně. Prohřešky tohoto
typu jsou vždy řešeny permabanem s možností resetu účtu.
Předpokládám, že nechceš, abych zveřejňoval, za co jsi ban skutečně
dostal, že?
Bloodysnakee, on 20 November 2015 - 09:48 AM, said: Kayi4ek:
Subject: Clan Wars: 4th Campaign - Rules and Regulations
Link on message: #11700357
still_mojo, on 19 November 2015 - 12:32 AM, said: Hm, thats pretty hars specially since noone knew it will not be
reseted, at that time we all thought it will be just for campaign,
yet it transfered to cw map and in next campaign. Can you at least
propose devs to reset those penalty points between events, things
happen and punishments are rather harsh like this.
Link on message: #11700357
still_mojo, on 19 November 2015 - 12:32 AM, said: Hm, thats pretty hars specially since noone knew it will not be
reseted, at that time we all thought it will be just for campaign,
yet it transfered to cw map and in next campaign. Can you at least
propose devs to reset those penalty points between events, things
happen and punishments are rather harsh like this.Decept1on: They were not very "open" to such suggestion when I made it.
The reason is that once warned you are supposed to know that such
system exists and take it into account.
Subject: Clan Details Are In The Game Now!
Link on message: #11700345
Pesticide9000, on 19 November 2015 - 07:49 PM, said: All right. But it seems to me that the window where you
could compare weekly and total collected industrial resource
between all clan members is gone. Now you can only compare
between members attached to a given building.
Link on message: #11700345
Pesticide9000, on 19 November 2015 - 07:49 PM, said: All right. But it seems to me that the window where you
could compare weekly and total collected industrial resource
between all clan members is gone. Now you can only compare
between members attached to a given building.Decept1on: Yes, we are aware of that issue, we are checking for
solutions, a possibility could be a micropatch to fix this (and
other things).
Subject: Reakce na verzi 9.12 – Přepracování systému dohledu
Link on message: #11700231
Rypaque, on 19 November 2015 - 06:49 PM, said: Ano, ale proto jsem celou dobu psal o dohledu, nikoliv o
odhalování. Ale touhle aktualizací se vlastně degradoval určitý
dohled (bino a optika) z 1000 x 1000 metrů pouze na kruh o průměru
1000 metrů. Tedy 78,5 procenta toho, co bylo dřív. A
vzhledem k tomu, že někdo mi začíná dávat ve velkém mínusy, tak s
fórem končím, nechám si své názory a připomínky jen pro sebe
... Asi některým udělám radost. 
Link on message: #11700231
Rypaque, on 19 November 2015 - 06:49 PM, said: Ano, ale proto jsem celou dobu psal o dohledu, nikoliv o
odhalování. Ale touhle aktualizací se vlastně degradoval určitý
dohled (bino a optika) z 1000 x 1000 metrů pouze na kruh o průměru
1000 metrů. Tedy 78,5 procenta toho, co bylo dřív. A
vzhledem k tomu, že někdo mi začíná dávat ve velkém mínusy, tak s
fórem končím, nechám si své názory a připomínky jen pro sebe
... Asi některým udělám radost. Kayi4ek: Jak se degradoval dohled bina? Měnil se pouze render
distance. Dohled bina/optiky byl vždy max. kruh 500 metrů a ne těch
teoretických 707, na které se ti renderovaly tanky, v rozích render
distance čtverce.
Subject: Speciál: Vydání aktualizace 9.12
Link on message: #11700104
alda321, on 19 November 2015 - 08:11 PM, said: Místo vyšperkovanýho perfektního T18 mám v garáži hromadu šrotu,
která nabíjí 7 vteřin a doměřuje nehorázně dlouho. Moc díky. Tohle
dokáže nas*at....
Jaguarek, on 19 November 2015 - 08:23 PM, said: a co taky jsem nasra.. ze jsem si kdys dal gold camo na
hellkata a je znej srot kterej nehraju. taky uz to nikdy neudelam
nema cenu se k necemu vazat tady nejsou zadny pravidla
Link on message: #11700104
alda321, on 19 November 2015 - 08:11 PM, said: Místo vyšperkovanýho perfektního T18 mám v garáži hromadu šrotu,
která nabíjí 7 vteřin a doměřuje nehorázně dlouho. Moc díky. Tohle
dokáže nas*at....Kayi4ek:
Jaguarek, on 19 November 2015 - 08:23 PM, said: a co taky jsem nasra.. ze jsem si kdys dal gold camo na
hellkata a je znej srot kterej nehraju. taky uz to nikdy neudelam
nema cenu se k necemu vazat tady nejsou zadny pravidlaKayi4ek: Řeknu vám na to jedno slovo. Balanc. Ty tanky byly příšerně
OP, tak se musely upravit/nahradit. Jednoduché.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Questions & Answers
Link on message: #11698957
__Napoleon__, on 19 November 2015 - 10:19 PM, said: The teams that won obviously had better players and/or
tactic
Link on message: #11698957
__Napoleon__, on 19 November 2015 - 10:19 PM, said: The teams that won obviously had better players and/or
tactic Karlie: You answered yourself on that one for sure. Better players
usually win the tournaments and tactics make it happen without
ending on blind draws. you could for sure end up good
players against good players - in that case, better tactics and
reactions on opponents moves win. All you needed was to destroy one
more tank. Ryge was though correct writing that in those low tiers
tournaments this can be difficult and I totally agree - but its
doable.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Questions & Answers
Link on message: #11698834
__Napoleon__, on 19 November 2015 - 09:47 PM, said: No, actually it doesn't. Especially because it was the 3rd
round that was won, a tie-breaker game. There is odd number in
best-of for a reason...
__Napoleon__, on 19 November 2015 - 09:55 PM, said: Next time put a bigger map where you don't need to yolo suicide and
where equally good teams will be in pat position, and then will
talk. And if you even wanted to clear all that out, you could
simply ask for replays and you would see it. Admins are
above rules, always were and always will be, but you decide to not
let us go after winning a tie-breaker. Almost each cup you
have the same issue. It's always better to learn on your own
mistakes, rather than learning from others and implementing good
solutions. Thank you, no further replies are needed.
Link on message: #11698834
__Napoleon__, on 19 November 2015 - 09:47 PM, said: No, actually it doesn't. Especially because it was the 3rd
round that was won, a tie-breaker game. There is odd number in
best-of for a reason...Karlie: This is exactly where you are wrong. This tournament is not
set with tie breaker. Tie breaker works only in some tournaments -
like in WGL (big tournaments). Odd numbers you are referring to
have nothing to do with winning final battle. It is the number of
games per round = Bo3 - the odd number here is 3 = 3 games and as
you correctly linked you need to win the majority of those battles
= 2. I hope this helped you to be a bit better oriented in the
eSports terms. And I am sorry you didn't make it any further in
this tournament but you are claiming "issues" without reading the
rules. If you would read them, you would know you need to push a
bit more and you wouldn't be surprised after your reports wasn´t
accepted.
__Napoleon__, on 19 November 2015 - 09:55 PM, said: Next time put a bigger map where you don't need to yolo suicide and
where equally good teams will be in pat position, and then will
talk. And if you even wanted to clear all that out, you could
simply ask for replays and you would see it. Admins are
above rules, always were and always will be, but you decide to not
let us go after winning a tie-breaker. Almost each cup you
have the same issue. It's always better to learn on your own
mistakes, rather than learning from others and implementing good
solutions. Thank you, no further replies are needed.Karlie: Napoleon, I don´t know how better to explain to you that
there is NO tie-breaker in this tournament. The only issue here was
you not reading the rules. We didn't go above them, we followed
them. And for the maps...as you can see the tournament tree, many
teams managed - usually those who read the rules.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Questions & Answers
Link on message: #11698788
aggroblner, on 19 November 2015 - 09:13 PM, said: The 3rd one is a win... We know it's best of three, but we
had advantage in first 2 battles and won the 3rd one... Even
results say 1 - can't we proceed? I don't think it's in cups
interest to disqualify teams, and it's not like we camped or won
first and then went for draws other 2 rounds...
Link on message: #11698788
aggroblner, on 19 November 2015 - 09:13 PM, said: The 3rd one is a win... We know it's best of three, but we
had advantage in first 2 battles and won the 3rd one... Even
results say 1 - can't we proceed? I don't think it's in cups
interest to disqualify teams, and it's not like we camped or won
first and then went for draws other 2 rounds...Karlie: The advantage here is clearly set by the rule draw with tier
points. Unless you don't have the necessary advantage which is
specified, you don't have advantage. And Bo3 means winning at least
2 battles.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Questions & Answers
Link on message: #11698773
__Napoleon__, on 19 November 2015 - 09:47 PM, said: No, actually it doesn't. Especially because it was the 3rd
round that was won, a tie-breaker game. There is odd number in
best-of for a reason... Since it's so hard to open the link, here is a definition copy-pasted:
The rule you're implying to and avoidance of camp is so
strong argument, that even ESL realized they need to change their
own rules. But you still, after years of making cups, would rather
see other teams advance without play and allow less battles per
cup, than to allow as much battles as possible. Yes, it really
makes logic to not let one team go that in the end proved better,
but also to let another team a free-pass to next RO.
Link on message: #11698773
__Napoleon__, on 19 November 2015 - 09:47 PM, said: No, actually it doesn't. Especially because it was the 3rd
round that was won, a tie-breaker game. There is odd number in
best-of for a reason... Since it's so hard to open the link, here is a definition copy-pasted:
The rule you're implying to and avoidance of camp is so
strong argument, that even ESL realized they need to change their
own rules. But you still, after years of making cups, would rather
see other teams advance without play and allow less battles per
cup, than to allow as much battles as possible. Yes, it really
makes logic to not let one team go that in the end proved better,
but also to let another team a free-pass to next RO.Karlie: I am sorry but do you understand the meaning of word
"majority"? and "odd" numbers in this case is meant the bo3 or Bo5
or even Bo1? Before we continue this discussion, this is something
that needs to be cleared out.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11698750
__Napoleon__, on 19 November 2015 - 09:41 PM, said: And since when and where is that stated in rules? Since there is
nothing, I am referring to next best thing - official ESL one!
Oh, maybe because it's a general knowledge for some, so
AGAIN, READ AND EDUCATE YOURSELF: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/the-best-of-three-or-five-etc.
Link on message: #11698750
__Napoleon__, on 19 November 2015 - 09:41 PM, said: And since when and where is that stated in rules? Since there is
nothing, I am referring to next best thing - official ESL one!
Oh, maybe because it's a general knowledge for some, so
AGAIN, READ AND EDUCATE YOURSELF: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/the-best-of-three-or-five-etc.Karlie: Please let me inform you that this is not ESL game. ESL is
different platform with different rules. Feel free to read our
rules for tournament perhaps here or here. They linked from the main article.
edit: Its funny you copied that since that sentence is explaining
you that you need to win 2 out of 3 or 3 out of 5. 
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11698733
aggroblner, on 19 November 2015 - 09:13 PM, said: The 3rd one is a win... We know it's best of three, but we
had advantage in first 2 battles and won the 3rd one... Even
results say 1 - can't we proceed? I don't think it's in cups
interest to disqualify teams, and it's not like we camped or won
first and then went for draws other 2 rounds...
Dastan2010, on 19 November 2015 - 09:16 PM, said: so even though we won a game (and therefore overall) we do
not win? that doesn't make sense to me
Link on message: #11698733
aggroblner, on 19 November 2015 - 09:13 PM, said: The 3rd one is a win... We know it's best of three, but we
had advantage in first 2 battles and won the 3rd one... Even
results say 1 - can't we proceed? I don't think it's in cups
interest to disqualify teams, and it's not like we camped or won
first and then went for draws other 2 rounds...Karlie:
Dastan2010, on 19 November 2015 - 09:16 PM, said: so even though we won a game (and therefore overall) we do
not win? that doesn't make sense to me Karlie: Yes, we know about this option but towards what we see in
each tournament, we don´t think this will encourage players not to
camp. Meaning, you would have one win in Round 1 and for that you
could decide camp for Round 2 since your "win" is already
"secured". Hope it makes a bit more sense now.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11698593
aggroblner, on 19 November 2015 - 09:06 PM, said: G-AssBlasters vs. baptist in dirty water Round 1: Draw (2 points
more for us)
Round 2: Draw (1 points more for us)
Round 3: Win Screenshots: http://imgur.com/3KE0NBJ http://imgur.com/y6yvKe5 http://imgur.com/RFjIJbc http://imgur.com/NnTSNRD http://imgur.com/T6txO0q http://imgur.com/Ql6GjRZ
Link on message: #11698593
aggroblner, on 19 November 2015 - 09:06 PM, said: G-AssBlasters vs. baptist in dirty water Round 1: Draw (2 points
more for us)Round 2: Draw (1 points more for us)
Round 3: Win Screenshots: http://imgur.com/3KE0NBJ http://imgur.com/y6yvKe5 http://imgur.com/RFjIJbc http://imgur.com/NnTSNRD http://imgur.com/T6txO0q http://imgur.com/Ql6GjRZ
Karlie: Sorry, the report is not valid You dont have 3 points
advantage
Subject: Geschenk kommt nicht an
Link on message: #11698505
Derbysieger, on 19 November 2015 - 08:45 PM, said: Ich glaube da hat einer den TE hölliisch verar***t und lacht sich
jetzt kaputt....
Schrotti, on 19 November 2015 - 08:47 PM, said: Schaut fast so aus. Wer verschenkt denn einen IS-6 bei dem Preis
. Oder es wurde eben doch mit
Lastschrift gezahlt und dann dauert es. Außerdem muss man das
Geschenk auch annehmen (auf der Hauptseite).
Link on message: #11698505
Derbysieger, on 19 November 2015 - 08:45 PM, said: Ich glaube da hat einer den TE hölliisch verar***t und lacht sich
jetzt kaputt....Sehales: Exakt das ist der Fall. Ich möchte nochmal anmerken (falls der Herr
"Moderator" hier mitliest): Sich als Administrator, Moderator,
Entwickler oder in irgendeiner Weise offizieller Mitarbeiter von
Wargaming auszugeben ist nicht erlaubt und kann mit Sanktionen wie
Chatsperren oder Accountsperren geahndet werden.
Schrotti, on 19 November 2015 - 08:47 PM, said: Schaut fast so aus. Wer verschenkt denn einen IS-6 bei dem Preis
Sehales: Ich bezweifle stark, dass da jemals etwas kommen wird...
Thread geschlossen.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11698338
_ImPurple, on 19 November 2015 - 08:04 PM, said: Hy! BATTLE CASPERS vs. God's Unit - Nemesis 1:1 with
this draw. 3 points rule cant work now, what now? http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham Here
is it again.
Link on message: #11698338
_ImPurple, on 19 November 2015 - 08:04 PM, said: Hy! BATTLE CASPERS vs. God's Unit - Nemesis 1:1 with
this draw. 3 points rule cant work now, what now? http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham Here
is it again.Karlie: And you, again, dont have the tier points advantage, sorry.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11698293
_ImPurple, on 19 November 2015 - 08:00 PM, said: http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham Here
are the replays
Link on message: #11698293
_ImPurple, on 19 November 2015 - 08:00 PM, said: http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham http://wotreplays.co...e-t1_cunningham Here
are the replaysKarlie: Hi, you dont have tier points advantage and you didnt even
mention the name of the teams.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11698286
BolekPoland, on 19 November 2015 - 07:59 PM, said: He edit it, look again pls
Link on message: #11698286
BolekPoland, on 19 November 2015 - 07:59 PM, said: He edit it, look again plsKarlie: They are out of the tournament so nothing we can do here -
they can´t be disqualified. Use in-game reports for insults.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11698252
marcin1101, on 19 November 2015 - 07:52 PM, said: Vulgar behaviour of ZWACK clan, under name of Face Down [edited]Up
during Back to the roots fun cup The team "Face Down
[edited]up" broke the rules of engagement by extensive use of
vulgarisms and taunting Not mentioning the team's name in the first
place. Files attached
Link on message: #11698252
marcin1101, on 19 November 2015 - 07:52 PM, said: Vulgar behaviour of ZWACK clan, under name of Face Down [edited]Up
during Back to the roots fun cup The team "Face Down
[edited]up" broke the rules of engagement by extensive use of
vulgarisms and taunting Not mentioning the team's name in the first
place. Files attachedKarlie: Hi, no file is attached.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11698244
DestructoRek, on 19 November 2015 - 07:48 PM, said: Umyj Się! vs Foxtrot-Uniform-Charlie-Kilo
1xDraw http://wotreplays.co...k-t1_cunningham
2xDraw http://wotreplays.co...k-t1_cunningham
3xPoint's Rule 3xDraw http://wotreplays.co...k-t1_cunningham
Link on message: #11698244
DestructoRek, on 19 November 2015 - 07:48 PM, said: Umyj Się! vs Foxtrot-Uniform-Charlie-Kilo
1xDraw http://wotreplays.co...k-t1_cunningham
2xDraw http://wotreplays.co...k-t1_cunningham
3xPoint's Rule 3xDraw http://wotreplays.co...k-t1_cunningham
Karlie: Hi, sorry, you have 1:0 and you needed at least 2:0.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11698239
JanekZCzterechPancernych, on 19 November 2015 - 07:44 PM, said: R_D1 - god team VS DPA - Hieny Pola Bitwy 1- Draw 3
points for DPA - Hieny Pola Bitwy 2- Defeat 3- Draw
http://imgur.com/a/jb2XX
Link on message: #11698239
JanekZCzterechPancernych, on 19 November 2015 - 07:44 PM, said: R_D1 - god team VS DPA - Hieny Pola Bitwy 1- Draw 3
points for DPA - Hieny Pola Bitwy 2- Defeat 3- Draw
http://imgur.com/a/jb2XX Karlie: Hi, that gives you only 1:1 which is a final draw.
Subject: Back to the Roots - Rules Enforcement
Link on message: #11698232
AlkorQua, on 19 November 2015 - 07:43 PM, said: Face down [edited]up vs H00LS
First match we had a team of 8, one of us couldn't enter the game. We engaged them, they played totally passively.
Second match: both team played passively
Third match: we met in the little village, they played more agressively but we won.
If it's possible, we would like to play one more with an admin who is spectating the teams http://wotreplays.co...7d7a7448ab05b67
http://wotreplays.co...7d7a7448ab05b67
http://wotreplays.co...7d7a7448ab05b67
Link on message: #11698232
AlkorQua, on 19 November 2015 - 07:43 PM, said: Face down [edited]up vs H00LSFirst match we had a team of 8, one of us couldn't enter the game. We engaged them, they played totally passively.
Second match: both team played passively
Third match: we met in the little village, they played more agressively but we won.
If it's possible, we would like to play one more with an admin who is spectating the teams http://wotreplays.co...7d7a7448ab05b67
http://wotreplays.co...7d7a7448ab05b67
http://wotreplays.co...7d7a7448ab05b67
Karlie: WOW, I have never seen that before. 0 damage on both sides.
Sorry, nothing we can do, you basically "didn´t play".
Реклама | Adv















