Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Дата: 31.08.2012 21:34:32
Xlucine, on Aug 30 2012 - 21:03, said: Surely that should read "not even this year", or are you planning
to release one before 2013?Vallter: We hope to release one in 2012.
RedRaiders, on Aug 30 2012 - 21:18, said: WG,Are there plans to upgrade the game engine to support multi-core processors? Y
Vallter: Yes, there are such plans. Current issue was in Big World engine
and not the game. Since we've purchase Big World development of
this feature will go faster. Sorry, cannot give you ETA on this for
now.
Brann, on Aug 30 2012 - 21:28, said: It's not that I disagree with you, I'm primarily a German tank
driver, but our concerns are not falling on deaf ears, WG just
doesn't want to make an overpowered tank while trying to fix an
underpowered tank. It has been stated in this thread
that if the next wave of buffs does not fix (say the E100) than
penetration buffs will be brought into consideration. It
is important though when you bring complaints to the table though,
that you present them in an orderly, thought out, and calm manner
is not only polite but it will also get better results in the
end. When you use caps, bring up supposed bias, and in
effect make a post that insults the devs I wouldn't expect good
results from that. I'm not saying to kiss ass but raging
in a thread that is getting consistent developer attention is just
not the way to go.Edit: this is also not the place to argue this, so last reply on this matter for me.
Vallter: Well, though we will answer any question, we appreciate polite
manner and calm feedback. This allows us to answer exactly the
questions itself and skip emotions. Thus we spend more time on
writing the reply, then reading something that won't influence on
the reply.
Maus123, on Aug 30 2012 - 21:37, said: Have you ever considered adding the Object 279, it could be a good
tank with an armor nerf.Vallter: Npt in the nearest future, but I would not exclude such
possibility.
Death187, on Aug 30 2012 - 21:38, said: Vallter,I have a quick question.
Since the game went live there have been several gift tanks and preorder tanks. For the people who sold them, will we ever be able to buy them back if we had them in our garage? I do not mean open them up for sale in the gift shop. I mean allowing us to rebuy gift and preorder tanks that we sold from our own garages.
Vallter: There were thought about this. Unfortunately, if implemented, this
feature will probably work from the date of implementation. With
Beta Testers it's easier, we have their dates of registration.
Though I doubt that the data will be stored about pre-order
vehicles for such long period. All in all, we will try to implement
it in the best way, when it will be possible. And closer to the
date we will check, whether it will be possible to include
pre-order vehicles there.
But at the end, it's distant future perspective.
But at the end, it's distant future perspective.
M18HellCat, on Aug 30 2012 - 21:43, said: Oh, this was my first time lol. I thought he was answering recent
questions.Vallter: I answer questions one-by-one, starting from person, which has
waited for the longest term.
Eliminateur, on Aug 30 2012 - 21:49, said: Vallter,you mentioned something very interesting in response to a question about the preorder tanks: that they won't be allowed to be bought WHILST someone is still using them.
This got me really curious, i don't know if you're able to share this data with us(i hope so):
Can you tell us the approxiamte ammount of players(that have them in their accounts) still with one of the 3 preorder tanks(for us server or for any server), and if i might be bolder, the ammount of *active*(that have played them in the last 2/3 months) of the same tanks.
regards
Vallter: Unfortunately, we cannot disclose such statistics in the sake of
our business information. There are still many, this is the only
thing I can state. And I'm glad that players, who contributed the
game even in Beta, are still playing. This is indication of the
right direction.
_Goliard, on Aug 30 2012 - 22:29, said: The oldest MM chart I could find was from v0.6.3.8, and even back
then tier 3 TDs couldn't see any tank above tier 5.Vallter: I will check this on Monday, and, if so, revise my answer. All in
all, it could overperform with this MM and, for example, Marder II
was overperforming for rather long time. We just did not want to
touch it before all changes were ready.
Super_Salo7, on Aug 30 2012 - 22:43, said: when is ural steel finals?Vallter: 14-15, if I remember right.
slenderfungus, on Aug 30 2012 - 22:52, said: Give it a moderate butt and I might even buy it once I research it
then.Vallter: We need to see the influence of the planned one first to consider
other buffst to E-100 and whether they will be required.
hawkeyem4, on Aug 30 2012 - 23:54, said: Will there be night battles or weather comin' soon.Vallter: WE will work closely on that, once finish new renderring system.
Only after that we will have technical possibilities to implement
this features.
Tedster59, on Aug 31 2012 - 00:03, said: I was reading the EU forum, and reading their Q&A thread, and
saw this, which no dev had replied to:I was wondering if anybody here knew about this.
Vallter: We have tank experts from NA, Britain, Russian, Germany, France all
working on gathering date. We rarely mistaken with historical or
real-life data. But sometimes we have to change historical data to
balance the game more.
Montykoro, on Aug 31 2012 - 00:56, said: Thanks again Valter! Im very happy about this interaction, General
Direction did a good Job also! I feel a new and better PR in the NA
office and i like it!Vallter: You are welcomed. Though I am more Minsk HQ employee working with
NA office closely-)
Hirumaru, on Aug 31 2012 - 01:26, said: -skip-Vallter: will be answered later
Zamolxet, on Aug 31 2012 - 01:42, said: The wiki says that WG does not try keep the tier 9 and somehow the
tier 8 vehicles from the Maus line competitive,will the VK4502s
recive rebalance?The VK4502A is a `Meh` tank.
The VK4502B is really bad compared to the IS8,M103,ST1 and the E75.While it is performant when it is top dog,it can`t deal with tier 10s at all and the new MM makes it hard for it to compete.
They have bad win rates.
Vallter: Both vehicles won't receive any change in 8.0, because we think
their performance is OK. Yes, I do agree that VK4502A is rather
dificult to handle, but it's awesome once mastered. Due to it's
better speed, it's sometimes preferred to KT. VK4502B is more
defensive type of vehicle, thus can be seem not as good as E-75
with it's offensive stile. But both vehicles are balanced.
teamoldmill, on Aug 31 2012 - 02:46, said: Valter,Vallter: All answrered above
ARGENTVS, on Aug 31 2012 - 03:39, said: and why im playing the beta of War Thunder instead WoT of WoW, but
mostly Mass Effect 3, i cant tolerate the quantity of poeplo
destroying my matchs. I tell you, you will lose a lot of players if
you dont fix the issue of overpopulation of bad players, dont
divide em, just mix good and bad in equal proportions in each team.Vallter: What connection WoWP and WoT have aside of common feratures? They
are done by defferent Dev teams. All in all, it's your choice,
which game you play.
XenomorphZZ, on Aug 31 2012 - 04:05, said: Wait what, when did this happen? Why is this not explained more in
game? For all intents and purposes the WoT wiki lists the ammo
rack's saving throw chance at 27% and that no other factors are
involved.Vallter: It was here quite a while. I will try to find an up tp date article
and share it with you.
Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era